Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 08/26/2026 View Tue 08/25/2026 View Mon 08/24/2026 View Sun 08/23/2026 View Sat 08/22/2026 View Fri 08/21/2026 View Thu 08/20/2026
1
2026-08-26 Home Front: Politix
Fed Judge Indira Talwani ignores SCOTUS
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Frank G 2026-08-26 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [312 views ]  Top
 File under: Lawfare 

1 
Time to remind a lot of judges we still have US CONSTITUTION and its their duty and obligation to follow it.
Posted by NN2N1  2026-08-26 04:07||   2026-08-26 04:07|| Front Page Top

2 The lust for power overrides the thought, if she doesn't have to pay attention to SCOTUS' ruling why should any of us have to pay attention to her rulings?
Posted by Procopius2k 2026-08-26 07:35||   2026-08-26 07:35|| Front Page Top

3 Excellent point P2K. If SCOTUS doesn't deal with this black robed tyrant, they will regret it.
Posted by Warthog 2026-08-26 07:53||   2026-08-26 07:53|| Front Page Top

4 

Any bets if the Liberal Islamic Democrat Socialist Party takes POTUS office again, that she'll be on the list for a SCOTUS seat?
Posted by NN2N1 2026-08-26 09:11||   2026-08-26 09:11|| Front Page Top

5 So how much actual power the SCOTUS have over lower-tier Federal Courts? Not sure they have any real hammer to use. Doesn't the Constitution put that in Congress's hands?
Posted by Mercutio 2026-08-26 09:47||   2026-08-26 09:47|| Front Page Top

6 Everything below the Supreme Court exists at Congresses pleasure. The only Constitutional court is the Supreme Court, all others were created by congress and can be deleted by congress.
Posted by Silentbrick 2026-08-26 17:37||   2026-08-26 17:37|| Front Page Top

7 Fatal Flaw appears to revealed by this direct disobedience. Options are pretty limited given a bifurcated Congress any sympathetic other Jurists:

"AI Overview
A federal judge who openly or systematically defies a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court can face administrative penalties through the federal judiciary, or ultimate removal from office by Congress.Because Article III of the U.S. Constitution grants federal judges life tenure during "good behavior," punishing or removing them involves specific, limited channels.Appellate Reversal and Mandamuses.

Overturning the decision: The primary and immediate remedy for a lower court decision that contradicts Supreme Court precedent is reversal by a higher appellate court or the Supreme Court itself.Writ of Mandamus: A superior court can issue a writ of mandamus—an order commanding a lower court judge to properly apply binding law or dismiss improper actions.

Judicial Conduct and Disability Proceedings Under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act (28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364), complaints against a lower federal judge can be filed and reviewed by the circuit's judicial council.Sanctions: A judicial council can issue private or public censures or reprimands.Case Reassignment: The council can temporarily suspend the judge from receiving new case assignments or disqualify them from specific cases.Limits: The statute explicitly protects judicial independence regarding standard legal decisions; a mere disagreement over a ruling is typically handled through appeals rather than misconduct complaints. However, willful, bad-faith defiance of a superior court's explicit mandate crosses into conduct prejudicial to the administration of the courts.Congressional Impeachment and RemovalImpeachment by the House: If a judge's defiance is viewed as a corrupt abuse of power or a breach of the "good behavior" clause, the House of Representatives can vote to pass articles of impeachment.Conviction by the Senate: Following impeachment, the Senate holds a trial. A two-thirds supermajority vote is required to convict the judge and remove them from office permanently. This method is historically rare and reserved for extreme malfeasance."

Posted by NoMoreBS 2026-08-26 18:27||   2026-08-26 18:27|| Front Page Top

23:46 49 Pan
22:36 NoMoreBS
21:34 trailing wife
20:06 SteveS
19:41 Dopey Photch2701
19:34 Frank G
19:18 trailing wife
19:15 Lord Garth
19:11 Lord Garth
18:27 NoMoreBS
18:12 Lord Garth
18:09 Lord Garth
17:38 Silentbrick
17:38 Procopius2k
17:37 Silentbrick
17:35 Silentbrick
17:34 Silentbrick
17:27 swksvolFF
17:26 Skidmark
17:25 ed in texas
17:22 Skidmark
16:41 Abu Uluque
16:28 Remoteman
15:22 Oregon Dave
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com