Article

2026-03-18 Home Front: Politix

John Roberts Calls for Restraint After Years of Judicial Overreach

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by DarthVader 2026-03-18 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1819 views ] Top

1

Based on what we have seen and read of Robert's rulings, bias political positions, vs the written law, the US Constitution and Bill Of Rights. Robert's needs to retire and move on.

Posted by NN2N1 2026-03-18 05:38|| 2026-03-18 05:38|| Front Page Top

2 Robert's needs to retire and move on.

But can he do it retroactively ?

Posted by Besoeker 2026-03-18 05:40|| 2026-03-18 05:40|| Front Page Top

3 Restraint is needed, yet we keep seeing the stupid liberal overreach.

Posted by Super Hose 2026-03-18 05:51|| 2026-03-18 05:51|| Front Page Top

4 Ask MA judge Brian Murphy, whose political decisions are repeatedly overturned. He wants to be an Executive and Super Legislature in a black robe. He should be removed and disbarred.

Posted by Frank G 2026-03-18 06:39|| 2026-03-18 06:39|| Front Page Top

5 Roberts may be conflating criticism of unconstitutional rulings as personal attacks as he watches open borders flood America with parasitic fraudsters as he worries about District judges feelings. Roberts should wear the female robe in the next session.

Posted by Airandee 2026-03-18 06:55|| 2026-03-18 06:55|| Front Page Top

6 You can not have a republic when one full branch is unaccountable to the people.

Posted by Procopius2k 2026-03-18 07:12|| 2026-03-18 07:12|| Front Page Top

7 ....one full branch is unaccountable to the people.

And all the others are hit and miss.

Posted by Besoeker 2026-03-18 08:20|| 2026-03-18 08:20|| Front Page Top

8 Y'all have seen restraint for too long!

Posted by chris 2026-03-18 08:42|| 2026-03-18 08:42|| Front Page Top

9 #5 Just a Brahmin defending his caste privileges.

Posted by Grom the Affective 2026-03-18 09:11|| 2026-03-18 09:11|| Front Page Top

10 #7 yes, but they don't sit for life.

Posted by Procopius2k 2026-03-18 09:52|| 2026-03-18 09:52|| Front Page Top

11 Procopius: they don't? Pelosi, Schumer, etc.

Our constitution says we will have no titles of royalty, but somehow certain titles have become lifelong, even hereditary. Maybe we need term limits.

Oh, no, that's "totally unreasonable".

Posted by Old Patriot 2026-03-18 17:40|| 2026-03-18 17:40|| Front Page Top

12 I like the idea of term limits, although it'll take a Constitutional Convention to get them, but that's going to give the staffers to Congress even more power than they have now.

Posted by Chantry 2026-03-18 18:38|| 2026-03-18 18:38|| Front Page Top

20:33 Lord Garth
20:28 ed in texas
19:00 Procopius2k
18:38 Chantry
18:36 Frank G
18:31 Grom the Affective
18:27 Chantry
18:26 Grom the Affective
18:23 Grom the Affective
18:22 Chantry
18:20 Grom the Affective
18:11 Frank G
17:43 Frank G
17:40 Old Patriot
17:12 Skidmark
16:22 Besoeker
16:13 Penguin_of_the_Best_Desert
16:10 European Conservative
16:01 Besoeker
15:58 Besoeker
15:50 Lord Garth
15:46 NoMoreBS
15:46 trailing wife
15:42 trailing wife
Merry-Go-Blog