Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 11/14/2026 View Fri 11/13/2026 View Thu 11/12/2026 View Wed 11/11/2026 View Tue 11/10/2026 View Mon 11/09/2026 View Sun 11/08/2026
2026-11-14 Britain
Britain's £3.5billion warship HMS Prince of Wales is held up from sailing to Norway… because it's foggy
[DM] Britain's biggest and most expensive warship has been held up on its latest mission – by fog.

The captain of HMS Prince of Wales, a state-of-the-art £3.5billion aircraft carrier, refused to sail the 65,000-ton giant into a narrow fjord in Norway because he said it was too risky.

The 920ft warship, which has been beset with problems since it was brought into service nine years ago, was on its way to a major security conference in the capital, Oslo, set to be attended by naval top brass this week.

The decision to avoid sailing in the heavy fog delayed the carrier's arrival by about 24 hours over the weekend, with the Norwegian armed forces' operational HQ in Bodø confirming: 'The captain thought there was too much fog.'

A defence source told the Daily Mail the setback was an example of 'good seamanship' and that there was no 'operational imperative' to risk the British flagship.

However, naval observers mocked the move, with one saying: 'We will go anywhere, except if it is a little misty.' Another added: 'Bloody Russians with their fog machines.'

The warship, built specifically to carry the new F-35B stealth jet, was taking time out of her deployment to the Arctic and High North to attend the security event.

She was escorted into the port city by HMS Dauntless, a £1billion missile defence destroyer, and Norwegian coastguards and police.

# id) ?>
Posted by Skidmark 2026-11-14 08:18|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| ||Comments [105 views ]  Top

1 The decision to avoid sailing in the heavy fog delayed the carrier's arrival by about 24 hours over the weekend, with the Norwegian armed forces' operational HQ in Bodø confirming: 'The captain thought there was too much fog.'

Hat tip to the Captain Power (on the right).

Posted by Besoeker 2026-11-14 10:27||   2026-11-14 10:27|| Front Page || Comments   Top

2 It's stupid to risk a $3.5 billion warship without good reason and what was essentially a port visit isn't a good reason
Posted by Chantry 2026-11-14 10:47||   2026-11-14 10:47|| Front Page || Comments   Top

3 Isn’t this because they refused to buy an Israeli radar system that could see through fog, because Israeli is so icky?
Posted by trailing wife 2026-11-14 11:43||   2026-11-14 11:43|| Front Page || Comments   Top

4 @3 more likely the fog would prevent visual identification of shoals and other things soon enough to prevent avoiding them. There may even been sunken ships from WWII in some of those fjords.
Posted by Chantry 2026-11-14 12:42||   2026-11-14 12:42|| Front Page || Comments   Top

5 #3 No. Zat's the Irish.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-11-14 13:12||   2026-11-14 13:12|| Front Page || Comments   Top

6 If they had proceeded as scheduled, and then run aground or collided with something, everybody would be blaming the captain for being reckless.
Posted by Rambler 2026-11-14 13:17||   2026-11-14 13:17|| Front Page || Comments   Top

7 ^^^^ Yes, there is only one man responsible when something goes wrong at sea.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-11-14 14:57||   2026-11-14 14:57|| Front Page || Comments   Top

15:08 Remoteman
15:00 Frank G
14:57 Besoeker
14:46 DooDahMan
14:28 Abu Uluque
14:18 Abu Uluque
13:26 Abu Uluque
13:21 Frank G
13:17 Rambler
13:15 Abu Uluque
13:12 Grom the Reflective
13:01 Abu Uluque
13:01 trailing wife
12:48 Frank G
12:42 Chantry
12:40 Abu Uluque
11:44 Grom the Reflective
11:43 trailing wife
11:36 trailing wife
11:14 Procopius2k
11:12 Grom the Reflective
11:05 Grom the Reflective
10:59 mossomo
10:57 Chantry
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com