Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 09/25/2026 View Thu 09/24/2026 View Wed 09/23/2026 View Tue 09/22/2026 View Mon 09/21/2026 View Sun 09/20/2026 View Sat 09/19/2026
2026-09-25 Home Front: Politix
'Unlawfully fired' Mar-a-Lago FBI agents fear 'possible punitive consequences' unless Judge Cannon clears up her order
[Law Crime]
Current and former FBI agents are asking the judge who barred former special counsel Jack Smith from speaking about his Mar-a-Lago report on President Donald Trump to clarify whether they can safely testify as part of the DOJ's "grand conspiracy" probe in Florida.

The motion to intervene, first reported by Politico, said that federal agents and analysts "participated in the investigation and prosecution of" Trump and the 2022 search of Mar-a-Lago, which led to his indictment in the classified documents and conspiracy case.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon famously tossed out the indictment by finding that Smith was unlawfully appointed as special counsel, deeming him little more than a "private citizen."

The Trump-appointed jurist went on to bury Volume II of Smith's report as a consequence of the dismissal, criticizing Smith for his "brazen" move to create the document in the first place.

After Cannon permanently blocked the DOJ and then-Attorney General Pam Bondi "or her successor(s)" from "releasing, sharing, or transmitting Volume II of the Final Report or any drafts of Volume II outside the Department of Justice" or "otherwise releasing, distributing, conveying, or sharing with anyone outside the Department of Justice any information or conclusions in Volume II or in drafts thereof," Smith was severely restricted in what he could say publicly about the classified documents case.

The intervenors, not wanting to be on the receiving end of a Cannon scolding for violating her injunction, asked for clarification on how the order applies to them in a grand jury subpoena context.

"Absent clarification, Clients cannot testify before the grand jury without risking violating terms of the Order. DOJ has reportedly taken the position that any disclosure of nonpublic information that may be contained in Volume Two would violate the Order, even if such disclosure was made in response to congressional inquiry, in response to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act, or during privileged communications with counsel," the filing said. # id) ?>
Posted by NN2N1 2026-09-25 06:42|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| ||Comments [68 views ]  Top

1 You fuckers are lucky you weren't hanged for sedition.
Posted by DarthVader 2026-09-25 08:47||   2026-09-25 08:47|| Front Page || Comments   Top

2 

How can "....Cannon permanently blocked the DOJ " when we have a SCOTUS?
NO

Yes an appeal been filed?

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit will hear it Jan. 18th, 2027.

11th Circuit Political Breakdown
Republican Appointees: 7 judges
Democratic Appointees: 5 judges

Posted by NN2N1 2026-09-25 09:54||   2026-09-25 09:54|| Front Page || Comments   Top

14:46 NN2N1
14:13 Rambler
14:09 trailing wife
13:26 Mercutio
12:59 Skidmark
12:39 Skidmark
12:34 mossomo
12:30 mossomo
12:15 MikeKozlowski
11:56 Procopius2k
11:48 Procopius2k
11:15 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
10:40 Skidmark
10:33 Skidmark
10:24 Rambler
10:19 Procopius2k
10:19 Skidmark
10:12 Skidmark
10:10 Grom the Reflective
09:59 Skidmark
09:54 NN2N1
09:47 Skidmark
09:42 NN2N1
09:35 Frank G
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com