Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 07/04/2026 View Fri 07/03/2026 View Thu 07/02/2026 View Wed 07/01/2026 View Tue 06/30/2026 View Mon 06/29/2026 View Sun 06/28/2026
1
2026-07-04 China-Japan-Koreas
SCOTUS Birthplace Citizenship Decision Is John Roberts' Roe v. Wade
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-07-04 01:32|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1850 views ]  Top
 File under: Commies 

1 well over a million Chinese nationals have acquired American citizenship through this mechanism.

The question that must be asked is why is this happening? Why are massive numbers of infants from one sovereign nation becoming citizens (administratively only) of yet another sovereign nation ?

Why are we legally downloading millions of potential Trojan Horses ?

Posted by Besoeker 2026-07-04 01:39||   2026-07-04 01:39|| Front Page Top

2 The people that have that answer should be shot in the fucking head. There is your answer.
Posted by Chris 2026-07-04 02:00||   2026-07-04 02:00|| Front Page Top

3 Of course it's SCOTUS fault - not thee Trump's admin for anticipating SCOTUS decision.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-07-04 03:02||   2026-07-04 03:02|| Front Page Top

4 More and more of Mr. Roberts judicial positions lack logic.
Posted by NN2N1 2026-07-04 04:40||   2026-07-04 04:40|| Front Page Top

5 I'm wondering if Robert is showing sign of dementia?
Posted by Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2026-07-04 05:20||   2026-07-04 05:20|| Front Page Top

6 /\ I am uncertain Seeking. Classical dementia would show some signs of progression. I'm leaning toward 'learned behavior' as opposed to a congenital disorder or dementia. Either way, it's time for him to find new work.

'The Firm Roberts, Barrett, and Jackson' has a nice ring to it.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-07-04 05:58||   2026-07-04 05:58|| Front Page Top

7 I still believe that either (or both) the Obama or Clinton cartels have some dirt on Mr Roberts that they're holding.
Posted by Mullah Richard  2026-07-04 06:43||   2026-07-04 06:43|| Front Page Top

8 Then it's the (more easily confirmed) Obama or Clinton....congenital disorders in play. Unfortunately, accurate family tracking may be something of a challenge.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-07-04 06:52||   2026-07-04 06:52|| Front Page Top

9 Roberts is compromised as hell, thanks to his time at kiddy diddler ranch (we have photos). Barrett is either compromised too or as I think she is, terrified of ruling against the uniparty and will buckle and vote with them when pressed.

Both need impeached, along with Jackson.
Posted by DarthVader 2026-07-04 11:46||   2026-07-04 11:46|| Front Page Top

10 Why are we giving all those pregnant Chinese women visas? Oh, that's right. Democrats would find a sympathetic, Obama appointed judge and sue Trump if he denied any of those people a visa. The lawfare would tie his hands for months if not years.

Grom, you're getting just as bad as the Democrats. They blame Trump for everything when it's really their fault. They're the ones who left the borders wide open. They're the ones who tells us that everybody in the whole, wide would should be allowed to just walk right into our country, no questions asked.

You don't have a choice between Trump and DeSantis. You don't even get to vote in our election unless Newsom mails a ballot to you. We'll have a choice between Republicans and Democrats and you better hope that we choose a Republican.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2026-07-04 13:24||   2026-07-04 13:24|| Front Page Top

11 whole, wide wouldworld
Posted by Abu Uluque 2026-07-04 13:26||   2026-07-04 13:26|| Front Page Top

12 #10 Aristotelian thinking. Democrats bad, hence Republicans good.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-07-04 13:47||   2026-07-04 13:47|| Front Page Top

13 The Supreme Court decision would have been nice, but it doesn’t really matter when there are several simple workarounds, from executive orders to a bill passed by Congress to more court cases testing the theory from different angles until one finally sticks to the wall.

Why are we giving all those pregnant Chinese women visas?

We hand out tourist visas wholesale. Given that these women are coming just long enough to drop their babies and get the paperwork signed before heading back home, six month tourist visas are more than long enough. But the other article posted on the subject today talks about how President Obama signed off on a 45 day visa-free waiver for Chinese tourists visiting the Northern Mariana Islands near Guam. That’s the other loophole that desperately needs to be closed, even though the locals will fight losing the tourist income.
Posted by trailing wife 2026-07-04 14:20||   2026-07-04 14:20|| Front Page Top

14 Democrats bad, hence Republicans good.

No. Democrats bad. Republicans not as bad. We do the best with what we have.

What? Did you like Obama better? How about if we elect AOC in 2028. Will that suit you?

And yes, tw. I went on to read that article about Obama giving them 45 days in the Marianas without so much as a visa requirement. Then I speculated that Obama is in cahoots with the CCP.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2026-07-04 14:48||   2026-07-04 14:48|| Front Page Top

15 How about if we elect AOC in 2028

As long as it's not Vance.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-07-04 15:00||   2026-07-04 15:00|| Front Page Top

16 Roberts was never in doubt, but Barrett faced an epic opportunity to solve a huge problem, and failed miserably, perhaps on of the most damning failures in any life-to have failed to save the future of your nation, single-handedly!
Posted by NoMoreBS 2026-07-04 15:44||   2026-07-04 15:44|| Front Page Top

17 Democrats bad, hence Republicans good better. Chauvinist foreigners opining on things they don't understand and don't experience? Not good.
Posted by Frank G 2026-07-04 17:30||   2026-07-04 17:30|| Front Page Top

18 I find it quite disturbing that 4 judges of the Supreme Court fail to understand what "subject to the jurisdicion thereof" means.
Posted by European Conservative 2026-07-04 20:29||   2026-07-04 20:29|| Front Page Top

19 "What is a woman"?
I'm stoopid and DEI, so I don't know
Posted by Frank G 2026-07-04 20:33||   2026-07-04 20:33|| Front Page Top

20 non sequitur
Posted by European Conservative 2026-07-04 20:39||   2026-07-04 20:39|| Front Page Top

21 We already have a law that if someone with citizenship, but permanently living abroad, has a child while abroad, that child does not inherit citizenship. So it is not in the blood, but is a matter of connection.

We get to redefine things either by changing how we understand the words or by passing new words. We’ve done it with slaves, with Prohibition, with Jim Crow/separate but equal…

But we work through these things slowly, to make sure the change is not a whim.

European Conservative, when your daughter was born here, did you think your move was permanent, or was it just until you finished whatever you were here to do?
Posted by trailing wife 2026-07-04 20:59||   2026-07-04 20:59|| Front Page Top

23:57 Bobby
21:38 Lord Garth
21:34 Penguin of the Best Desert
20:59 trailing wife
20:39 European Conservative
20:33 Frank G
20:29 European Conservative
19:52 NoMoreBS
19:48 trailing wife
19:19 trailing wife
18:35 Knuckles Grundy
18:10 Difar Dave
17:30 Frank G
17:07 JohnQC
15:59 Skidmark
15:53 Skidmark
15:44 NoMoreBS
15:17 NoMoreBS
15:12 Procopius2k
15:07 Skidmark
15:00 Grom the Reflective
14:48 Abu Uluque
14:46 Skidmark
14:23 Abu Uluque
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com