Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/07/2026 View Wed 05/06/2026 View Tue 05/05/2026 View Mon 05/04/2026 View Sun 05/03/2026 View Sat 05/02/2026 View Fri 05/01/2026
1
2026-05-07 Home Front: Politix
Jackson Accuses SCOTUS Of ‘Partiality' She And Her Fellow Liberal Justices Are Guilty Of
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-05-07 05:50|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1814 views ]  Top

1 ......it is her and her liberal colleagues who have made "partiality" and politics central to how they operate on the high court.

Let us not forget Judge Roberts, who smiles and rubber stamps each decision under the cloak of fairness and impartiality.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-05-07 05:57||   2026-05-07 05:57|| Front Page Top

2 I completely agree with Besoeker.

Also, NO, one does not. She is not worthy of her position on the SCOTUS.

"One really has to admire the hutzpah of Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson."
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2026-05-07 07:26||   2026-05-07 07:26|| Front Page Top

3 

Fast tracked by both Obama and Biden in the Federal Court system as needed for political Hay and Votes.

Need any more be said?
Posted by NN2N1 2026-05-07 08:36||   2026-05-07 08:36|| Front Page Top

4 She is a typical liberal DEI hire. Incompetent, arrogant and spiteful. Obumble's perfect little liberal, racist, asshole soldier.
Posted by DarthVader 2026-05-07 08:49||   2026-05-07 08:49|| Front Page Top

5 ^Thug - never a soldier!
Posted by Grom the Affective 2026-05-07 09:02||   2026-05-07 09:02|| Front Page Top

6 ^ same thing for the useful idiots.
Posted by DarthVader 2026-05-07 09:22||   2026-05-07 09:22|| Front Page Top

7 A "fundamentally non-serious" selection.
Posted by Crusader 2026-05-07 10:49||   2026-05-07 10:49|| Front Page Top

8 Comment on X: "Jackson is different from all the others in that she doesn't think of herself as a justice, but as the black female representative justice. She is there because of her identity. There is no way she would not have pulled out all the stops to support the retention of majority-minority Congressional districts and their continued existence through the midterm elections, even though the majority had ruled them unconstitutional. That was her job, as she perceived it. She was put on the Supreme Court not to decide cases, but to protect the Bennie Thompsons and Hank Johnsons of the world. They, not the nation, are her primary concern."
Posted by Matt 2026-05-07 11:35||   2026-05-07 11:35|| Front Page Top

9 ^ "My dissent says: this hurts my feels"
Posted by Frank G 2026-05-07 13:03||   2026-05-07 13:03|| Front Page Top

10 ^ It would be fun to watch Kamala arguing a case to Ketanji in a language only they understand. Sad, but funny.
Posted by Matt 2026-05-07 15:13||   2026-05-07 15:13|| Front Page Top

11 ^ Melanin Esperanto Salad?
Posted by Frank G 2026-05-07 19:13||   2026-05-07 19:13|| Front Page Top

12 If you don't know what you're saying, do it with 'flair'.
Posted by Mullah Richard OTR 2026-05-07 20:42||   2026-05-07 20:42|| Front Page Top

13 ^^ AKA 'If it don't run, chrome it.'
Posted by Mullah Richard OTR 2026-05-07 20:42||   2026-05-07 20:42|| Front Page Top

23:38 Skidmark
23:32 Skidmark
23:29 Skidmark
22:59 SteveS
22:58 The Walking Unvaxed
22:44 trailing wife
22:34 trailing wife
21:54 Woodrow
21:29 Difar Dave
21:08 Frank G
21:04 Fred
20:42 Mullah Richard OTR
20:42 Mullah Richard OTR
19:47 SteveS
19:15 Frank G
19:13 Frank G
18:54 Difar Dave
18:47 DarthVader
17:44 Crusader
17:26 NoMoreBS
16:16 Chantry
15:39 Skidmark
15:33 Skidmark
15:24 Skidmark
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com