Article

2026-02-17 Home Front: Politix

Minnesota lawmaker expresses concern after reviewing voter rolls, finding 3,000 people missing information

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Skidmark 2026-02-17 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1842 views ] Top

1 Voter rolls are supposed to be public records.

Posted by Super Hose 2026-02-17 05:58|| 2026-02-17 05:58|| Front Page Top

2
Doubtful it is only 3,000 and would bet it is more like ##,000 in number.

Posted by NN2N1 2026-02-17 08:57|| 2026-02-17 08:57|| Front Page Top

3 However, according to Alpha News, 1900 was used as a placeholder birth year for voters who registered before 1983 since they were not required to provide their date of birth.

Which means that some of them might have been born even before 1900.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2026-02-17 11:51|| 2026-02-17 11:51|| Front Page Top

4 Exactly NN. 3,000 is a joke. it has to be higher.

Posted by Woodrow 2026-02-17 19:13|| 2026-02-17 19:13|| Front Page Top

22:21 trailing wife
19:50 Frank G
19:46 Frank G
19:41 Frank G
19:39 Frank G
19:32 Woodrow
19:29 Knuckles Grundy1702
19:26 Knuckles Grundy1702
19:18 Frank G
19:16 Woodrow
19:14 Jefe101
19:14 Woodrow
19:13 Woodrow
19:10 Woodrow
19:08 Jairong+Scourge+of+the+Gepids2435
19:08 Woodrow
19:04 Woodrow
19:01 Woodrow
18:56 Woodrow
18:46 Jairong+Scourge+of+the+Gepids2435
18:36 Glenmore
18:36 Jairong+Scourge+of+the+Gepids2435
17:53 Mercutio
17:52 Mercutio
Merry-Go-Blog