Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 03/29/2026 View Sat 03/28/2026 View Fri 03/27/2026 View Thu 03/26/2026 View Wed 03/25/2026 View Tue 03/24/2026 View Mon 03/23/2026
1
2026-03-29 Europe
German city wary as Volkswagen weighs shifting car plant to Iron Dome production
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by trailing wife 2026-03-29 2026-03-29 04:53|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1830 views ]  Top

1 Detection and tracking is the same I suppose.

I wonder why industry isn't going whole hog after battle laser missile defense?
Posted by Skidmark 2026-03-29 06:52||   2026-03-29 06:52|| Front Page Top

2 [AI]
Why Industry No Pursuing Battle Lasers

Industry is actively pursuing battle lasers, with the US Department of Defense spending **$1 billion annually** on directed energy weapons and major programs like the UK's **DragonFire** (expected in service by 2027) and the US Navy's **HELCAP** and **HELSI** initiatives moving from prototype to deployment. However, widespread adoption faces significant hurdles including **atmospheric interference** (fog, dust, rain), **thermal management** challenges, and the **high cost** of power generation and cooling systems which currently limits their effectiveness against large threats like anti-ship cruise missiles.

While lasers offer **low cost-per-shot** and speed-of-light engagement for counter-drone and short-range defense, they often fail to replace conventional missiles for long-range or all-weather missile defense due to **insufficient power** and the need for prolonged **dwell time** on targets. Many promising systems have historically fallen into the **"valley of death"** between R&D and acquisition because of **engineering integration issues**, **beam coherence** problems, and a lack of consistent transition planning between research programs and operational needs.

* **Power and Size**: High-power lasers require bulky machinery and massive energy storage, making them difficult to integrate into mobile platforms without compromising mobility.
* **Environmental Sensitivity**: Laser beams can be scattered or absorbed by weather conditions, rendering them unreliable in rain, fog, or dusty environments compared to kinetic weapons.
* **Economic Viability**: Current laser systems are often more expensive per unit than existing interceptors for low-volume threats, only becoming cost-effective against high-volume drone swarms.


Well, there we have it.
Posted by Skidmark 2026-03-29 06:54||   2026-03-29 06:54|| Front Page Top

3 The US Army is already ditching its most powerful laser weapon yet
Posted by Skidmark 2026-03-29 06:55||   2026-03-29 06:55|| Front Page Top

4 I checked labor statistics to see whether Germany had a lot of Arab in the work force. 70% of their immigrants are employed. That surprised me.
Posted by Super Hose 2026-03-29 12:10||   2026-03-29 12:10|| Front Page Top

22:49 DarthVader
22:49 Woodrow
22:32 DooDahMan
22:04 trailing wife
20:45 Shinter Whaitle1745
20:20 Lord Garth
19:26 DarthVader
19:10 Frank G
19:03 Shinter Whaitle1745
18:44 Remoteman
18:36 Abu Uluque
18:27 Shinter Whaitle1745
18:26 Lord Garth
17:37 Knuckles Grundy
17:31 Grom the Affective
17:30 Grom the Affective
17:28 Knuckles Grundy
17:23 Mullah Richard
17:06 MegaByses
16:58 Grom the Affective
16:55 Abu Uluque
16:51 Abu Uluque
16:09 Chantry
16:00 Besoeker
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com