[YouTube] Joey Oliver (@TheRWCoalition) returns to discuss his upcoming book about the rightward radicalization of himself and his generation. The video is over an hour long, so if interested please watch it on Benjamin A Boyce’s YouTube page.
A few notes:
Nick Fuentes is no Christian, conservative or otherwise. He is at best amoral, grasping, and opportunistic, while Andrew Tate is chasing the worst of the shallow, vain, and abusive frat bro ethos. I understand why they object to the 3rd and 4th wave feminists that have been abusing boys and men since the 1980s.
Split between America First and MAGA?
What on earth did Mr. Oliver expect President Trump to do about Charlie Kirk’s assassination that he did not do? The betrayal, it seems to me is not Trump’s but the Left and those formerly of the center now justifying viciousness in support of their emotional NeverTrumpness.
The Zionist occupation of the Trump administration?? President Trump’s philosemitism goes back to his childhood, so it's not like they should be surprised by it now.
Paternalistic State: Order is a higher value than freedom, the right not to be preyed upon by criminals claiming the right to misbehave — this makes more sense than the original value statement sounds, because in America the protected freedom value never included abuse and criminality. The contrary interpretation is a Progressive invention.
Race betrayal? The concept is narrow minded and ties back to the Progressive idea of people as merely the sum of their labels. It is a step back for those claiming to be of the right to adopt one of the stupider leftwing ideas. But it seems to me that being attracted to any particular visual type is not racist.
He seems a bright and thoughtful man, at 27 no longer a young man, but definitely in some ways still immature and bound by some of the very Progressive ideas that he thinks he objects to.
#2
'Radicalization' is now their term for people walking away from woke indoctrination and goals. Yet it's the Left that is radicalized and engages in violence. Far Right is relative to the Left that has gone extreme left.
#4
At 15:10 Oliver sites our country becoming "South Africa." A very thought-provoking observation by a man of 26. Perhaps we've heard a similar observation made a time or two right here on the Burg.
#5
A video for those that choose not to read.
From those that choose not to write.
Yet, still narcissistic.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a psychological condition that has profound effects on the dynamics of human relationships. Individuals with NPD typically exhibit a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, a constant need for admiration, and a marked lack of empathy. This combination of traits makes interpersonal interactions particularly challenging, not only for those with NPD but also for the people around them, such as partners, friends, and coworkers. This paper explores the nature of NPD, its impact on various types of relationships, and potential therapeutic interventions that can help mitigate its effects.
What happens when a generation raised on conformity, guilt, and the hollow promises of a declining consumer society begins to question everything?
In American History Z, Joey Oliver (aka "The Right Wing Coalition") unveils a gripping, no-holds-barred chronicle of the political awakening of Gen Z, tracing the young men of America's journey from apathy and disillusionment to rebellion, rediscovery, and the search for new leaders and visions.
Part memoir, part political and cultural reckoning, American History Z plunges into the defining flashpoints of the 21st century: from the racial upheavals stoked by Black Lives Matter and the gender manipulations of wokeism to the rise of Donald Trump; from the shocking absurdities of the Covid-19 regime to the 2020 election steal and political repressions; from the rise of dissident voices like Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson, and Andrew Tate to the media breakthroughs of Tucker Carlson, Darryl Cooper and Nick Fuentes.
Bold, controversial, and impossible to ignore, American History Z captures the raw energy of a generation breaking with the illusory narratives of the past, daring to retake the present, and determined to shape the future.
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] Scientists are warning that a chilling series of red flags continues to be overlooked when viruses escape from labs, as whistleblowers claim Covid's true origins were covered up for years.
A team led by Sandhya Dhawan from the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit in Thailand noted that there had been roughly 70 infamous lab leaks since the 1900s and expected there to be even more in the future, which threaten the globe.
In the study, they focused on seven of these deadly incidents from 1955 to 2019, discovering the leaks all shared the same warning signs, such as unexplained early spread without a clear animal source, delayed reporting and outbreaks emerging near laboratories handling dangerous viruses.
Together, these lab leaks caused more than 1,800 known laboratory exposures, over 1.1 million infection cases and more than 700,000 deaths.
'The question is not if a pathogen will escape, but rather which pathogen will and what measures are in place to contain an escape with serious consequences,' the team warned in the study.
The alarming findings come as fresh whistleblower allegations on Wednesday reignite the explosive debate over whether Covid originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.
Former CIA officer James Erdman told a Senate hearing that US intelligence officials were preparing to conclude the pandemic likely leaked from a Wuhan lab before Dr Anthony Fauci allegedly 'significantly influenced' agencies to back away from that assessment in 2021.
Although the researchers did not directly investigate Covid in their review, Dr Jessica Rose, a Canadian immunology researcher at Memorial University of Newfoundland who was not involved in the study, told the Daily Mail that she believes Covid displayed several of the same unusual warning signs outlined in the paper.
Rose pointed to what she described as three unusual features in Covid's genetic code: a mutation called the furin cleavage site that made the virus highly infectious, strange genetic 'cutting patterns' often associated with lab research and a short sequence she claimed matched material found in a 2016 Moderna patent involving the human gene MSH3.
She argued these characteristics were highly unusual compared to closely related coronaviruses found in nature.
'I think the alignment with the "unusual/rare/novel strain characteristics" indicators in the Dhawan et al. paper's framework is unmistakable,' Rose said.
Rose explained that the furin cleavage site is a genetic feature that made Covid-19 especially effective at infecting human cells, despite being absent from many of the virus's closest known relatives.
She also claimed the virus contained unusual restriction-site patterns, which are sequences scientists use to cut and assemble genetic material during laboratory research.
'Together these form a cluster of rare coincidences that legitimate scientists argue deserve closer scrutiny as possible lab-origin signals,' Rose added.
The claims remain heavily disputed within the scientific community, and the new study did not conclude that Covid was engineered or leaked from a laboratory.
However, the Thai researchers said outbreaks involving unusual pathogen behavior should be investigated rapidly and transparently before public health crises escalate.
The seven major outbreaks researchers believed displayed strong indicators were accidental laboratory origins, including cases involving SARS, smallpox and polio.
One of the most severe occurred in 1955 during the Cutter Laboratories polio vaccine incident in California, when improperly inactivated vaccines containing live poliovirus were distributed to children.
About 120,000 children received the faulty doses, leading to roughly 40,000 infections, more than 200 cases of paralysis and at least 10 deaths.
Another alarming case came in 1977, when a strain of H1N1 influenza known as the 'Russian flu' suddenly reemerged in China and the Soviet Union after seemingly disappearing for decades.
Scientists later suspected the virus may have accidentally escaped from a laboratory or vaccine trial, eventually spreading worldwide and infecting millions.
In 1979, anthrax spores accidentally leaked from a Soviet military bioweapons facility in Sverdlovsk, now Yekaterinburg, exposing nearby residents to the deadly bacteria.
Soviet officials initially blamed contaminated meat, but later investigations confirmed at least 66 people died in what became one of the most infamous biological accidents in history.
The team also highlighted the 1995 Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis outbreak in Venezuela and Colombia, which some researchers suspected may have originated from a laboratory strain used in vaccines or scientific research.
The mosquito-borne virus infected tens of thousands of people and killed an estimated 300.
Following the original SARS outbreak, several separate lab accidents between 2003 and 2004 infected researchers handling the virus in Singapore, Taiwan and China.
The incidents sparked global alarm about biosafety failures after one person died and multiple others were infected through accidental exposure inside research facilities.
In 2007, a leak of foot-and-mouth disease virus from a research and vaccine complex in Pirbright, England spread to nearby farms and forced officials to slaughter thousands of animals to contain the outbreak.
Although the disease rarely infects humans, the incident caused devastating economic losses and intensified fears about safety protocols at high-containment laboratories.
More recently, in 2019, a biopharmaceutical plant in Lanzhou, China, accidentally released airborne bacteria that cause brucellosis after workers reportedly used expired disinfectants during vaccine production.
More than 10,000 people later tested positive for the infection, which can trigger chronic fatigue, fever and severe joint pain.
The study warned that misinformation, secrecy and delayed responses repeatedly worsened the impact of these outbreaks and eroded trust in public health institutions.
'Media further contributed to misinformation and infodemics, which eroded public trust in vaccines. Vaccine rates significantly dropped across the world,' the researchers wrote.
Rose warned that many of the same warning signs identified in the study, including confusing public messaging and efforts to downplay emerging outbreaks, continue to appear during new health scares.
'No one has been held to account yet, so there's no reason for the powers that be not to do a repeat performance,' she said.
However, Rose added that she was surprised by Erdman's testimony to the Senate Homeland Security Committee, in which he declared: 'Dr Fauci's role in the cover-up was intentional.'
The lab leak theory states that Covid-19 escaped from the Wuhan lab rather than spreading naturally from animals, such as bats, to humans.
The claims remain heavily disputed within the scientific community, and the new study did not conclude that Covid was engineered or leaked from a laboratory.
However, the researchers said outbreaks involving unusual pathogen behavior should be investigated rapidly and transparently before public health crises escalate.
Despite allegedly having evidence of a lab leak in 2021, the CIA only backed the claim with 'low confidence' in January 2025 after years of refusing to take a position on the pandemic's origins following the alleged Fauci meeting.
Erdman also alleged at the hearing that the CIA 'illegally monitored' the phones and computers of federal analysts investigating the origins of the virus.
'The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of DIG [Director's Initiatives Group] personnel, their investigations, and contact with whistleblowers,' he claimed.
The CIA has not publicly confirmed Erdman's allegations.
The researchers concluded that unless governments improve biosafety standards, transparency and outbreak reporting, the same overlooked warning signs that appeared before past lab-related outbreaks could allow another global crisis to spread before the world realizes what is happening.
Rose argued that, at the moment, nothing has significantly changed since Covid, despite the Trump Administration cutting off funding to Gain-of-Function (GOF) research, which changes a virus or bacteria to make them stronger and more contagious.
'Until the people responsible for the horrible damages incurred during and after the Covid era are held accountable, mitigation of infectious disease and even GOF pathogens will not get better.'
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited by Daniil Pelymov
[REGNUM] On May 17, 1941, Rudolf Hess, former Deputy Führer of the Nazi Party and official "number three" in the Third Reich, was incarcerated in the Tower of London.
The event, extraordinary in itself, was one episode in a strange story that points to the dark side of the Second World War.
A week before his incarceration in a British prison, on May 10, Hess piloted a Messerschmitt Bf 110 fighter jet alone and parachuted over British territory, landing near the town of Kilmanrock in western Scotland.
In the world's capitals, and Moscow in particular, there was initially a clear lack of belief in the reality of what had happened. Thus, a TASS report published in the newspaper Pravda on May 11 stated the following: "On May 10, 1941, a plane crashed in Scotland. The pilot survived. He identified himself as Rudolf Hess."
But the British authorities presented to the world precisely Rudolf Walter Richard Hess, the Reich Minister of the German Empire.
It became clear what happened, but why and, most importantly, for what purpose, remained a mystery.
Decades later, the case remains one of the greatest and most closely guarded mysteries of the 20th century. The British Crown still keeps key documents related to the case classified.
An attempt to understand what this flight was—the madness of a lone wolf, a Hitler- sanctioned mission, or a British intelligence operation—reveals an inconvenient truth for the West about the behind-the-scenes games on the eve of the attack on the USSR.
To understand the logic of Hess's actions, it is necessary to reconstruct the geopolitical picture of May 1941.
Just over a month remained until the start of Operation Barbarossa. Germany de facto controlled continental Europe, but a protracted war of attrition with Great Britain tied Adolf Hitler's hands.
The prospect of a war on two fronts, which the German General Staff had feared, was becoming an inevitable reality.
Under these circumstances, Berlin desperately needed a compromise with London. The idea of an "Anglo-German alliance" and a division of the world (Germany the land, Britain the sea) never left the Reich's leadership.
Hess, as one of the "old party fighters" and leading ideologists of Nazism, considered it his sacred mission to realize this concept by taking Great Britain out of the war before German tanks moved to the East.
Historiography and fragments of documents declassified by the intelligence services offer three main versions of what happened.
VERSION ONE: THE ACTION OF A MADMAN ALONE
According to the official version, put forward both by Berlin immediately after the incident and by post-war London, Rudolf Hess acted in a state of mental disorder and at his own risk.
Such statements are supported by official statements from the Nazi leadership on May 12, 1941, where Hess was declared a victim of “hallucinations” and “mental disorder.”
However, this version falls apart upon detailed analysis of the technical aspects of the flight.
Hess, despite being an experienced World War I pilot, piloted a heavy twin-engine fighter through several air defense zones, executed a complex navigational maneuver without a navigator, and flew precisely to his target. Only a person with an absolutely clear mind and iron concentration could accomplish such a feat.
The allegations that the Führer's deputy in the party, the number three Nazi (after Hitler and Hermann Goering ), turned out to be mentally ill, did not have the best effect on the regime's reputation.
After all, on April 20th, Hess delivered his traditional speech on Reich Radio to mark Hitler's birthday. And on May 1st, at the Messerschmitt factory in Augsburg, he urged workers to increase productivity. How could such a mentally unstable adventurer be entrusted with such a task?
Besides insanity, the backup theory “for internal use” was that Hess had fallen victim to ambition and jealousy.
Realizing that his influence in the Reich leadership was declining ( Martin Bormann, who became both the Fuhrer's personal assistant in the party and the chief of the NSDAP chancery, had crossed Hess's path), Hitler's semi-official successor Hess allegedly decided to perform a miracle and regain the Fuhrer's favor by personally negotiating peace with the British aristocracy.
VERSION TWO: HITLER'S SECRET MISSION
The second hypothesis states that Hess's flight was sanctioned by Adolf Hitler. If successful, the Reich would gain peace in the West and a free hand in the East. If unsuccessful, Hess would be declared insane, which is precisely what was done.
The Führer could not enter into formal peace negotiations with Winston Churchill , as this would have demonstrated Germany's weakness in the face of an imminent war with the Soviet Union. Hess acted as an unofficial emissary.
This was supported by the fact that the Führer's deputy had landed somewhere. Near the town of Kilmanrock, where paratrooper Hess landed, is the estate of Dungavel House, the estate of the Duke of Hamilton, Douglas, a relative of the Windsor dynasty.
Farm worker David Maclean, who met Hess, reported that the German, in passable English, claimed to have arrived to meet Sir Douglas and asked to be taken to him. However, instead of the Duke, it was the Renfrewshire Civil Defence Force who arrived and arrested the "guest."
These circumstances gave rise to the theory that Hess was flying as Berlin's envoy for separate negotiations with the royal family (over the head of Prime Minister Churchill). In this case, the choice of the Duke of Hamilton as the conduit is perfectly understandable.
Hess's teacher was Dr. Karl Haushofer, a prominent geopolitician and major general of the General Staff in the Kaiser's army. He was not a Nazi and despised Hitler's party for trivializing the concept of "living space," borrowed from his books. But Haushofer, a professor at the University of Munich, never lost sight of his student Hess. Haushofer's sons were friends with Hamilton, whom they met at the 1936 Berlin Olympics.
And – according to an already unconfirmed version – Hess was exploring the possibility of meeting with a relative of the British monarchs in neutral Lisbon.
The question remains: did Hitler's deputy act entirely on his own initiative? The Soviet leadership believed no.
"In Moscow, Hess's flight was perceived as a very alarming signal. It was seen as an attempt by certain circles in the Nazi leadership to achieve reconciliation with England and thereby secure Germany's rear for the war against the USSR," according to the memoirs of Soviet translator Valentin Berezhkov, who worked at the highest diplomatic level.
Testimonies from Hitler's entourage, recorded by historians, demonstrate the Fuhrer's strange behavior on the day when Hess's farewell letter was delivered to him.
This version explains why Hess flew with specific, detailed points of the peace agreement, which completely coincided with Hitler’s strategic goals: the preservation of the British Empire in exchange for recognition of German hegemony in Europe and freedom of action in the “Eastern space”.
VERSION THREE: A TRAP SET BY MI6
The most convenient version for London is that Hess's flight was the result of a brilliant operational game by the British secret services.
MI6, through proxies (in particular, the Duke of Hamilton), convinced the Nazi leadership that there was a powerful "peace party" in Great Britain, ready to overthrow Winston Churchill and enter into an alliance with Germany.
London's goal was obvious: to stall for time, to provoke Hitler into an immediate attack on the USSR, and thereby save Great Britain itself from inevitable defeat.
By capturing Hess, the British acquired a valuable hostage and a source of strategic information. Supporters of this theory point out that Hess believed in the seriousness of his "negotiations" until the very end.
The defendant himself at the Nuremberg Trials finally destroyed the myth of his "madness," which both Berlin and London had insisted upon. On November 30, 1945, Rudolf Hess personally read a sensational statement before the tribunal, which was recorded in the transcript:
“In order to prevent the possible opinion that I am not able to participate in this trial, despite the fact that I want to participate in the further conduct of the trial and want to sit in the dock with my comrades, which I already stated at the time, I want to make the following statement to the court, which I originally wanted to make later.
"I want to say that from this moment on, my memory is completely at the court's disposal. The reasons for feigning memory loss were purely tactical…"
This step showed that the “conscience of the Nazi Party,” as the defendant was called by German propaganda before the adventure, had acted throughout in a calculating, cold-blooded manner and had been playing a political game, the rules of which were determined far beyond the confines of his cell.
WHY THE TOWER?
Hess's incarceration in the Tower of London on May 17, 1941, had not only practical but also profound symbolic significance. For centuries, the royal fortress had been used to house high-ranking state criminals and individuals posing an existential threat to the British Crown.
Britain deliberately created a vacuum around Hess. He was not recognized as a prisoner of war in the standard sense, the press was not allowed to see him, and his testimony was carefully filtered.
Churchill's fears were understandable: if the Soviet leadership had learned that behind Moscow's back, London was pursuing, or at least listening to, proposals for a separate peace from one of the leading figures of the NSDAP, the trust between the future allies of the anti-Hitler coalition would have been completely destroyed.
This is precisely why Stalin remained deeply suspicious of Hess's "English captivity" throughout the war, fearing that the British were keeping this contact as a backup airfield in case the situation changed.
STRANGE DEATH IN SPANDAU
At the Nuremberg Trials in 1946, Rudolf Hess cut a strange figure: he feigned amnesia and made incoherent statements, but at the very last moment, he abandoned his madman persona, declaring his complete allegiance to Nazi ideals. The court sentenced him to life imprisonment.
Hess spent the next 40 years in Berlin's Spandau Prison, the final decades of which he spent as the sole inmate of this vast fortress, guarded in turn by the four victorious powers, including the USSR. The Soviet Union consistently blocked any attempts by Western countries to pardon the aging Nazi on humanitarian grounds. For Moscow, Hess remained a living symbol of the Anglo-Nazi conspiracy that never happened.
Hess's death in August 1987 at the age of 93 raised new questions. The official version was suicide by hanging from an electrical cable in the prison's garden shed. However, his son, Wolf Rudiger Hess, and several independent experts have proven that the elderly prisoner, due to severe arthritis, was unable to even raise his arms above his head, let alone construct a noose.
Immediately after Hess's death, the Spandau prison building was completely destroyed, and the construction debris was ground into powder and dumped into the North Sea to prevent the creation of a memorial.
This incident became a classic example of cynical “realpolitik” (the term Realpolitik was, incidentally, coined by the Germans), when the fates of states and millions of people are determined behind the closed doors of diplomatic residences.
The Hess case effectively laid the foundation for the post-war rift and deep mistrust between the West and the USSR.
Britain's persistent reluctance to open its archives and the regular extension of the secrecy regime for documents on the Hess case clearly indicate that the true story of this flight contains facts capable of completely refuting the official Western version of the beginning of World War II.
The mission failed as a diplomatic move, but it clearly exposed the hidden forces of geopolitics that are still at work today.
[AT] In Latin America, in China, in the Middle East, the outline of Donald Trump's plan of action is becoming clear. It is of a scale to take the breath away.
It’s obvious to me that during the four-year hiatus from the White House occasioned by a stolen election, President Trump gave thoughtful consideration to what had to be cleaned up domestically and internationally. It’s equally clear that he mapped out how he planned to do that, and despite media, congressional, and judicial intransigence, he plowed ahead. We are at a point now where the blueprint is obvious. It’s a continuing, ascending trajectory.
Posted by: Frank G ||
05/18/2026 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[1764 views]
Top|| File under:
#2
Oy vey (Yiddish: אױ װײ) is a Yiddish phrase expressing dismay or exasperation. Also spelled oy vay, oy veh, or oi vey, and often abbreviated to oy, the expression may be translated as "oh, woe!" or "woe is me!" Its Hebrew equivalent is oy vavoy (אוֹי וַאֲבוֹי, óy va'avóy). Sometimes the phrase is elongated to oi yoi yoi (with the yoi being repeated as many times as desired).
[Jpost] It’s only natural to want to applaud the extension of a ceasefire.
After all, who doesn’t want a ceasefire: a halt, if only temporary, to rockets falling, drones buzzing, and bombs exploding?
The problem is that the US State Department’s Friday announcement — following another round of negotiations between Israel and Lebanon in Washington — extending the ceasefire between the two countries is something of a fiction.
Why? Because it is not the government of Lebanon that decided to wage war against Israel, first on October 8, 2023, and then again on March 2, 2026. It is Hezbollah, the terrorist organization that owns a commanding stake in the country, and whom the rest of the shareholders either cannot — or do not want, out of sympathy — to control.
And it is Hezbollah that is firing drones at Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon, there to prevent the terrorist organization from once again setting up a base of operations directly on Israel’s border, with the expressed intent of, at some point, launching an October 7-style invasion of the Upper Galilee.
Israel and Lebanon are formally in a state of war, and have been since 1948, so talks between the governments, through their ambassadors in Washington, are not insignificant. But a ceasefire with Lebanon doesn’t mean much, since their armies aren’t fighting one another. IMO, the problem with the current situation is that it doesn't give the rest of the vermin non Hezbollah Lebanese any motivation to control Hezbollah.
Posted by: Grom the Reflective ||
05/18/2026 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[1744 views]
Top|| File under: Hezbollah
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
