[GEO.TV] Jeffrey Want Some Candy, Little Girl? Epstein ...A high class pimp financier who was alleged to maintain a stable of underage whoressex slaves who were paid big bucks to entertain the rich and/or famous. He was really surprised when he commited suiciede in jail... is said to have admitted Andrew's infamous photo with sexual abuse victim is real. But also that the affair wasn't? The dear departed sex financier, who trafficked Virginia Giuffre to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, is spotted confirming in one of the emails to a news hound that the picture on record of the two is real. If you believe one statement do you have to believe the other?
In an email from Epstein to a news hound in July 2011, he wrote: ''Now that strauss kan [sic] girl will be shown to be a total liar. So which part is true, and why?
''Maybe your paper should jump on and show that (redacted)'s allegations re andrew [sic] are the same, she also accused numerous people of having sex with her, dersh, ehud, etc. Dershowitz and Ehud Barak also accused of celebrity humpage?
''Not one paper had the balls to question her credibility.'' Y'gotta believe the woman™, right?
Further in the email, Epstein adds: ''The girl has fled the country with an outstanding arrest warrant. Referring to Virginia Giuffre?
''The da [sic[ after she accused others, said in writing that she has no credibility, she was never 15 years old working for me, her story made it seem like she first worked for trump [sic] at that age and was met by ghislaine maxwell [sic]. Throwing blame on Trump, who had banned him from Mar-a-Lago, and Ghislaine??
''Total horses***, the daily mail [sic] paid her money, they admitted it, with the statement that it took money to coax out the truth. Assuming she provided actual truth...
''Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew, as many of my employees have,'' he noted. Andrew had a reputation for being a horny fellow. I'm sure he was in his younger days. They used to call him Randy Andy. He also served as a Sea King helicopter co-pilot with the Royal Navy during the 1982 Falklands War. He participated in missions like anti-submarine warfare, search and rescue, and casualty evacuation, famously acting as a decoy for Argentine missiles. I respect him for that.
Posted by: Fred ||
11/13/2025 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[1765 views]
Top|| File under:
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited by Alexander Melnik
[REGNUM] The situation in Africa's most populous country, Nigeria, is rapidly deteriorating. The country is descending into chaos: the conflict between the country's largest terrorist groups, Boko Haram and the Islamic State in West Africa (ISIS-WA), has intensified.
Attacks on the country's Christian population continue, which, in turn, is causing discontent in Washington and threats of military intervention.
ALL AGAINST ALL
The Lake Chad region, where the borders of Nigeria, Cameroon, Niger and Chad meet, has become the epicenter of a fierce confrontation between two jihadist groups, Boko Haram and ISIS-WAP.
This conflict, which began in 2015 with an ideological split, has evolved into a brutal war for territory, resources and influence.
Ten years ago, the then-leader of Boko Haram, Abubakar Shekau, pledged allegiance to the head of the Islamic State, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and joined the group. However, in 2016, he was removed from leadership, and Abu Musab al-Barnawi, the son of Boko Haram founder Mohammed Yusuf, was appointed as the new leader.
Shekau refused to recognize the change of power, returned the organization to its former name, Boko Haram, and left ISIS-WA.
The reasons for the split lie in ideological differences between the groups, primarily regarding their attitudes toward the Muslim population. For example, Boko Haram leaders adhere to an extremely radical takfiri ideology, considering all Muslims who do not join the jihad to be apostates, which justifies their killings.
In turn, ISIS-ZA promises not to attack mosques and markets in northern Nigeria in order to increase the loyalty of the local population.
An important difference.
The active phase of the conflict between the groups began in December 2022, when ISIS fighters attacked enemy camps, killing about 56 Islamists.
Over the next two years, terrorists fought each other in the Lake Chad region, until Boko Haram pushed its opponents south into Nigeria in 2024. Already that year, the group, having gained strength, began carrying out punitive operations against civilians suspected of sympathizing with its rivals.
In May, approximately 100 people were killed in the villages of Mallam Karamti and Kwatatandashi. And in late October and early November, Boko Haram militants successfully attacked ISIS positions on Tumbun Gini Island in the Lake Chad region, killing 50 ISIS supporters and seizing a large quantity of small arms and explosives.
Boko Haram militants are thus intensifying their attacks on rival jihadists to gain control of strategically important fishing grounds, particularly the islands of Lake Chad, and trade routes that provide access to weapons and supplies.
GENOCIDE OF CHRISTIANS
According to various Christian organizations and human rights groups, at least 7,087 Christians were killed in Nigeria between January and August 2025—an average of 32 per day. Another 7,899 Christians were abducted during the same period.
Meanwhile, according to Amnesty International, at least 6,896 people, including a significant number of Christians, were killed in Benue State as a result of conflict between January 2024 and May 2025. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) reports that more than 500,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) live in the state.
The most high-profile case of Christian killings in Nigeria this year was the Sankere massacre, when gunmen killed more than 72 people in villages in Guma County, Benue State, most of whom were members of Christian communities.
One of the bloodiest massacres occurred in the village of Elewata in the Duma district of the same state on June 13–14. According to the Catholic diocese, between 100 and 280 people were killed, mostly internally displaced persons who had found refuge at the local Catholic mission.
If we look at the statistics since 2009, about 125 thousand Christians have died at the hands of Islamists, 19 thousand churches have been destroyed, and 1,100 Christian communities have been forced to leave their land.
The second main source of violence is the conflict between Muslim Fulani herders and Christian farming communities in central Nigeria. However, in this case, the primary motive for the persecution of Christians is not religion, but rather the struggle for access to water and pasture.
Why not both, for the greater pleasure of the attackers?
ANOTHER SMALL VICTORIOUS WAR
In early November, US President Donald Trump accused Nigeria's leadership of failing to protect its Christian population from mass killings. He said that if the African government continued to allow the killing of Christians, Washington would immediately deploy its national armed forces to eliminate the Islamists. Because he can't do that here?
The president's impulse was immediately supported by Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth: "Either the Nigerian government will protect Christians, or we will destroy the Islamic terrorists responsible for these atrocities."
The plight of Christians in Nigeria has been a major issue for American conservatives for years, with some of Trump's close allies, including Senator Ted Cruz, advocating for intervention.
But what goals does the American president really have in threatening Nigeria with military intervention?
The first goal is to consolidate the electoral base.
Evangelical Christians make up approximately 25% of the American electorate and are the primary source of votes for the conservative wing of the Republican Party. They are extremely concerned about the persecution of believers in other countries and see Trump as a defender of their fellow believers.
By taking a tough stance on Nigeria, Trump is directly appealing to this group, strengthening their loyalty ahead of the 2028 elections.
The second goal is to strengthen US influence in Africa.
Nigeria is one of the continent's largest economic centers. The country is rich in natural resources, including oil, gas, and critical minerals needed by Washington to develop green technologies.
Trump is trying to regain his lost influence on African politics, weakened in recent years by the actions of Russia, China and the UAE.
The third goal is distraction.
The threat of military intervention in Nigeria serves as an excellent distraction from the domestic problems of the United States: the economic crisis, political polarization, and other challenges facing the administration.
WAR SCENARIOS
Following Trump's statements, US military command began developing plans for possible military action. According to US media, three levels of potential intervention have been developed.
The most radical involves sending an aircraft carrier group to the Gulf of Guinea off the coast of Nigeria and using aircraft to strike targets in the north of the country.
A more cautious scenario involves using MQ-9 Reaper and MQ-1 Predator attack UAVs for precision strikes against militant camps, supply convoys, and individual targets in northern Nigeria.
Finally, the most acceptable option for the Nigerian government is to increase intelligence sharing, logistical support, and joint operations between the US and Nigerian forces against both terrorist groups.
That last is a waste of time, it seems to me. It’s been done before, to no long term effect whatsoever.
However, senior Pentagon officials acknowledge that targeted American operations in Nigeria will not be able to reduce violence or undermine the terrorists' combat capabilities. Achieving these goals will require a large-scale campaign, similar to those in Iraq and Afghanistan. The White House is currently not considering such a scenario.
This presents a dire situation for Nigeria's leadership: the military and law enforcement agencies are unable to independently combat the Islamists who are carrying out punitive operations against the country's Christian population. Meanwhile, the Donald Trump administration is exploiting the tragedy of the Nigerian people to gain additional political points.
#5
Perhaps you like your food flavored with BBC? British War Asylum Seekers systematically eliminating the European Colonizer Language from Central Africa?
[Breitbart] The futuristic city of NEOM was supposed to be the crown jewel of Saudi Arabia’s turn toward a more advanced and diverse economy, but eight years into the project, the Financial Times revealed, cost overruns and engineering failures are piling up.
The Financial Times (FT) all but pronounced last rites over NEOM, calling it a “dream unraveled” in a lengthy article last week that made it clear almost everything has gone wrong – from the rude discovery that hanging a 30-story building from a titanic arch was a lot harder than concept designers thought it would be, to the biggest rookie mistake of architects since time immemorial: forgetting that poop flows downhill. The executive director of the project decided to build a network of hundreds of shuttle cars to handle the pungent fruit of NEOM’s thousands of toilets.
The chandelier building was the brainchild of a designer named Olivier Pron, who also did design work on a few Marvel superhero films. He was reportedly brought onto the project because Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), the godfather of NEOM, liked those movies.
The signature element of NEOM – the building that appeared in mind-blowing concept art that captured the world’s imagination eight years ago – is a “linear city” known simply as The Line. It resembled a glass skyscraper tipped on its side, a high-tech version of the Great Wall of China rendered with mirrored glass, a hundred miles long and almost a quarter-mile high.
The Line was designed to be so huge that it would contain an indoor marina big enough to handle massive cruise ships, so enormous that a stadium big enough to handle the 2034 World Cup would overlook the sheltered harbor.
Eight years after all of this was visualized, cost overruns have eaten up $50 billion and produced little more than a forlorn construction site. International investors no longer seem to believe the city of the future will truly be built and top Saudi officials now speak of NEOM as a “multi-generation development.” Some of the project’s insiders told FT that management is looking for a way to “gently” tell MBS that his prized geography-defying science-fiction metropolis will never be completed.
There will be no easy way to tell the de facto chief executive of Saudi Arabia that the naysayers were right all along. The whole point of NEOM, in MBS’ telling, was to show the world that Saudi Arabia could invest its oil wealth into cutting-edge technology and build something that seemed impossible. MBS took what seemed like an impressive plan for a new city and turned it into an arcology, a self-contained metropolis of incredible dimensions, twice as long and twice as high as his engineers and architects recommended.
There were supposed to be people living in NEOM by 2025, and the first phase, which would have been among the largest construction projects in the world on its own, would be completed five years later. The entire structure was projected to cost $1.5 trillion in 2021.
The cost estimate has tripled since then, and exciting big dreams have crashed into various uncomfortable realities. The world might not be able to produce enough steel and cement to complete the original design; one former NEOM employee told FT that the annual cement production of France would be barely enough to build the 20 “modules” that were due by 2030, and there was no way to ship the cement to NEOM quickly enough.
The first phase of the project was dramatically scaled back, to three “modules” instead of 20 – at which point investors lost interest in the entire project because the revised first phase could not accommodate enough people to make the city viable.
One former employee described the scaled-down project as “uninvestable” and a lot of the money already committed to construction has been spent in ways that cannot be audited. Most of the project managers are still afraid to admit failure, even as it grows difficult to pretend that anything close to MBS’ original vision will ever be constructed.
The sad current state of affairs is that massive foundations have been laid for stupendous structures that will probably never be built, a tribal village in the area appears to have been razed for nothing, some of the tribesman are in prison for protesting against construction that will never be completed, and even the airport project stalled out because a mountain is blocking one of its proposed runways.
The Times of London on November 1 quoted a Saudi official who said, “We spent too much. We rushed at 100 miles an hour. We are now running deficits. We need to reprioritize.”
The official was talking about NEOM and all of Saudi Arabia’s other flashy “gigaprojects,” including a mountain ski resort that was to be located near NEOM, a lavish new downtown district for Riyadh, and a Red Sea island resort and superyacht marina called Sindalah.
Part of the problem is that MBS wrote his “Saudi Vision 2030” plan for transforming the Kingdom to a post-oil economy with the assumption that oil would hover around $100 per barrel, but it fell below that threshold in 2022 and might not see triple digits again for years. With only about 60 percent of the funds anticipated by Saudi Vision 2030, the government is shifting its priorities to technology investments like AI and smaller projects with firm short-term completion dates.
“We had a weakness – hype and glitz. I call it the Dubai disease. We picked it up from Dubai. Everything became a glitzy video,” a Saudi business leader grumbled to the Times.
Posted by: Skidmark ||
11/13/2025 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[1775 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Saudi Arabia
#1
Still standing today: Roads and Aqueducts built by the Romans ~2000 years ago.
[RAIRfoundation] In the span of one election, CAIR’s decades-long blueprint for political domination has come to life — forty-two Muslim candidates, backed by a Hamas-linked network, have seized key offices across America, proving that the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan to infiltrate from mosque to city hall is no longer a warning, but a reality.
They told us the plan. Now we’re watching it unfold — in real time.
This week, terror-linked Islamic organizations are celebrating a stunning milestone: a record forty-two Muslim candidates elected to public office across the United States, the most significant wave of Muslim political victories in American history.
According to the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) own data, the newly elected officials span at least nine states — New York, Virginia, Michigan, New Jersey, Maryland, Washington, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. The list includes five mayors, four state legislators, two judges, and dozens of city council, county, and school board members.
While establishment media frame this as “representation,” the organizations behind it are anything but benign. CAIR — named by the U.S. Department of Justice as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism-financing trial in American history — is openly boasting that their decades-long political strategy is succeeding.
CAIR’S FOUNDER PUBLICLY REVEALED THE PLAN
Just weeks ago, RAIR Foundation USA exposed CAIR founder Nihad Awad preaching from a California mosque, where he unveiled a decades-long blueprint to embed Islamic influence inside America’s core institutions.
“We have 4,000 mosques in the country… If each mosque funds five students in journalism, filmmaking, political science, and law… by 2050, we will have 100,000 of each — and we will run for office at all levels of government.”
That was not a sermon. That was a mobilization order. Awad instructed American Muslims to stop donating to overseas relief and instead fund political power inside the United States.
He declared that “political engagement must become the norm” and named CAIR as the vehicle to carry out the strategy.
THE POLITICAL MACHINE: CAIR’S NEW SUPER PAC
To turn Awad’s vision into political reality, CAIR quietly launched its own federal Super PAC, the Unity & Justice Fund, giving the Islamic network a powerful financial engine to capture U.S. elections.
Within months of its creation, the PAC was already funneling six-figure sums into key races — including the New York City mayoral election that propelled Zohran K. Mamdani to victory, making him the city’s first Muslim mayor.
Awad and CAIR leaders have openly taught congregants how to use mosques as political launchpads — leveraging tax-exempt religious institutions and CAIR’s 501(c)(4) network to build campaign infrastructure. The result is a political machine operating from the pulpit to the ballot box, financed through the same Islamic centers that claim to be apolitical houses of worship.
FROM THE PULPIT TO POWER: WHO THEY JUST ELECTED
The 2025 elections shattered every record for Muslim representation in American politics — marking a historic leap from mosque activism to municipal and state power.
Among the most prominent victories:
Zohran K. Mamdani (New York City, NY) — the first Muslim mayor of New York City, a self-described socialist who campaigned on housing reform, police defunding, and immigrant rights.
Ghazala Hashmi (Virginia) — the first Muslim lieutenant governor in U.S. history and the first Muslim woman ever elected statewide.
Abdullah Hammoud (Dearborn, MI) and Mo Baydoun (Dearborn Heights, MI) — mayors of Michigan’s two largest Muslim-majority cities.
Faizul Kabir (College Park, MD) — software engineer turned activist, now mayor.
Ted Green (East Orange, NJ) — reelected with CAIR Action backing.
Adam Alharbi (Hamtramck, MI) — officially certified November 9, 2025, winning the state’s closest race and ensuring Hamtramck remains under Muslim leadership.
Ajmeri Hoque (Franklin County, OH) and Soma S. Syed (New York) — newly elected judges.
Yusef Salaam (New York City Council, District 9) — one of the “Exonerated Five,” now a major progressive voice in city politics.
CAIR celebrated these victories as the culmination of a decade-long campaign to embed Muslim activists across the civic and political mainstream. In 2010, fewer than twenty Muslims held elected office nationwide; by 2020, that number had tripled. In 2025, it has more than doubled again — a transformation powered by relentless organizing and strategic messaging.
NUMBERS BEHIND THE MILESTONE
According to CAIR’s updated report, 76 Muslim candidates ran for office nationwide and 43 have been declared winners, with three races still pending recounts or certification.
HOW THEY’RE DOING IT
CAIR’s “civil rights” facade conceals a coordinated infrastructure:
Mosques as political hubs: Awad’s speeches in Texas and California instruct imams to train and fund political candidates under the mosque’s 501(c)(3) umbrella, a direct violation of tax-exempt rules.
CAIR Action and the Unity & Justice Fund: Twin advocacy arms designed to fund campaigns, produce media, and conduct voter mobilization.
Media arms: Muslim Network TV, Islamic Relief, and Yaqeen Institute amplify the narrative of “Muslim empowerment,” providing free airtime and press coverage for endorsed candidates.
University networks: Muslim Student Associations (MSAs) and aligned campus groups groom the next wave of activists who will “run for office at all levels of government.”
This is not spontaneous civic engagement — it’s an orchestrated movement.
THE RESULTS: AN ISLAMIC BLOC IN AMERICAN POLITICS
The forty-two Muslim officials elected in 2025 now occupy positions in some of the most influential jurisdictions in the country — from the New York mayor’s office to Virginia’s executive branch, from Michigan’s heartland to local school boards.
Each of these victories represents a node of influence in a growing political network that transcends state lines. CAIR and its affiliates are already preparing a 2025–2026 Directory of Elected Muslim Officials and expanding civic-education programs to mobilize even more candidates before the 2026 midterms.
What the media calls a “historic first,” CAIR calls “phase one.”
[American Liberty] The term "color revolution" refers to a strategy used abroad to depose governments under the banner of democracy and anti-corruption. It has a familiar rhythm: mobilized NGOs, pliant media, bureaucratic resistance, and international coordination dressed in moral language. Data analyst Jenica Pounds, known on 𝕏 as DataRepublican, has now exposed evidence suggesting that this playbook was imported home. According to recordings she surfaced, a network of State Department and USAID insiders, aided by foreign partners and billionaire-funded NGOs, began coordinating before Trump’s January 20, 2025, inauguration. Their aim was to protect themselves from the incoming administration and preserve a parallel architecture of governance capable of outlasting any elected populist.
#2
That is why there is silence from the government on the pipe bomber. If they deny the truth, they will be found out. If they confirm the truth, the avalanche begins.
Posted by: Super Hose ||
11/13/2025 5:29 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Their aim was to protect themselves from the incoming administration and preserve a parallel architecture of governance capable of outlasting any elected populist.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
...A 
