[TennesseeFirearms] SB1958 / HB1971 — A Nefarious Attempt To Place Legislative Power Beyond Constitutional Accountability
Every generation of Tennesseans, indeed every generation of Americans, inherits the same fragile system of government: a constitutional republic built on limited governmental authority, divided powers, enforceable rights, and the rule of law. That system does not sustain itself automatically. It survives only so long as each branch of government and each individual government official respects the concrete boundaries that the People imposed by the Constitution on government. It survives only so long as citizens retain meaningful access to the courts when those boundaries are crossed.
Certain Tennessee Republican Legislators have proposed SB1958 / HB1971 which must be evaluated within that framework. Despite being marketed by its sponsors (Senator John Stevens and Representative Andrew Farmer), as a mere procedural refinement, in truth the legislation represents something far more consequential: an attempt to weaken, restrict, and cloud the mechanisms by which citizens may ask the judiciary to determine whether the Tennessee Legislature itself has violated constitutional limits on its power and authority.
This is not routine legislative housekeeping. It is a direct challenge to the structural safeguards that protect the people from governmental overreach. It is a direct attack by each supporting Legislator on the constitutional framework that defines the powers of the Legislature and the mechanism that the people established for enforcing that limited legislative authority.
At its core, the Sponsors and supporting Legislators are seeking in this bill to repeal an existing statutory cause of action (Tenn. Code Ann. 1-3-121) that Tennesseans have relied upon when seeking declaratory or injunctive relief against unconstitutional governmental action. These legislators are seeking to replace it with new statutory language that expressly excludes challenges to the constitutionality of Legislative action by enacting or preserving state statutes.
That distinction is not subtle. It is surgical. Under the change proposed by the bill’s legislative supporters, citizens would be allowed to have pathways and “standing” to challenge local governments, yet the citizens face newly constructed barriers should they seek to question whether enactments of the General Assembly violate the Tennessee or United States Constitutions. The unavoidable implication is that the Legislature is attempting to redraw the accountability map in a way that places its own acts on more protected ground. The Legislature is boldly telling the citizens, whether it passes this law or not, that it does not care what the constitutions say about the limits on legislative authority – they are willing to ignore the limits imposed by the citizens through the constitution and at the same time deny to the citizens the ability to ask the courts to serve as the “check and the balance” on constitutional abuses by legislators.
This maneuver strikes at one of the oldest and most settled principles in American constitutional law. More than two centuries ago, the United States Supreme Court declared in Marbury v. Madison (1803) that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”
[PJ] Susan Rice has a message for corporate America, and it sounds a lot like a threat.
Obama’s scandal-plagued former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations sat down with former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara on his podcast Stay Tuned and laid out what Democrats have in store for businesses, law firms, universities, and media companies that have sought to accommodate the Trump administration.
It was a disturbing promise of government retribution.
Rice wasted no time getting to the point. "It's not gonna end well for them," she promised. "For those that decided that it was, you know, that they would act in their perceived very narrow self-interest, which I would underscore is very short-term self-interest, and, you know, take a knee to Trump."
I intend to go and vote against the Democrats in November, dear Reader. Doing my bit to prevent enjoying their retribution forever and aye, amen.
She claimed that those same institutions are already starting to feel the political winds shift — and are beginning to regret their choices. President Donald Trump's agenda, she said, is growing unpopular, and a Democratic resurgence is coming. When it does, revenge is on the menu. And it sounds like it’s going to be served hot.
"If these corporations think that the Democrats, when they come back in power, are gonna, you know, play by the old rules, and say, 'Oh, never mind, we'll forgive you for all the people you've fired, all the policies and principles you've violated, all, you know, the laws you've skirted,' I think they've got another thing coming," Rice said.
She invoked redistricting as an example of Democrats being too soft in the past — and made clear that era is over. "Just like when Trump thought, 'Okay, I'll redistrict, and the Democrats won't have the guts to play hardball,' they're gonna be surprised. Democrats have had a belly full, and we're not gonna play by, you know, the old set of rules, when these guys are playing by a very different set of rules."
#1
Rice made the same threat that once back in power Dems would return to trying to ruin the country. We already know that. It’s like an alcoholic threatening us that once they get booze again, they’re going to get blasted until they vomit and take a dump in their pants. That’s not brilliant prognosticators. We have Biden, Spanbugger and Mandani as recent examples of the heinous policy they have planned at all levels if given executive power of any sort.
Posted by: Super Hose ||
02/21/2026 7:01 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Hey, this was always their plan. How is it different from the Biden group?
Posted by: ed in texas ||
02/21/2026 8:11 Comments ||
Top||
#6
This has always been the plan since Obubmle. Just the last election they painted themselves into a corner with their two picks for pres because they were trying to keep some veneer of legitimacy. They won't make that same mistake the next time and will go full Lenin and Stalin.
#9
She is talking war. Be careful little girl, there are some very bad people out here that will do evil things to keep this from happening. We are a republic, not a monarchy...
Posted by: 49 Pan ||
02/21/2026 14:31 Comments ||
Top||
#10
Obama’s League of Warrior Women. They’ll never, ever stop.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
