Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 11/11/2023 View Fri 11/10/2023 View Thu 11/09/2023 View Wed 11/08/2023 View Tue 11/07/2023 View Mon 11/06/2023 View Sun 11/05/2023
1
2023-11-11 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Intellectual dishonesty caused the experts to misread the Gaza military situation
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2023-11-11 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [17 views ]  Top
 File under: Hamas 

#1 Ummm...Did they have 51 experts?
Posted by Skidmark 2023-11-11 00:29||   2023-11-11 00:29|| Front Page Top

#2 The experts aren't.
Posted by Procopius2k 2023-11-11 07:42||   2023-11-11 07:42|| Front Page Top

#3  a source known to lie


Like the Dem Party and Wokesters every where.
Posted by AlanC 2023-11-11 09:39||   2023-11-11 09:39|| Front Page Top

#4 Executive summary:
While good analysis of any major news story should not accept on face value any claims by the participants, it most certainly must not accept the claims of a source known to lie.
Posted by Elmaper McGurque1612 2023-11-11 10:20||   2023-11-11 10:20|| Front Page Top

#5 CIA right up there in the "too good to check" category.
Posted by M. Murcek 2023-11-11 10:22||   2023-11-11 10:22|| Front Page Top

#6 Source reliability
Rating Description
A Reliable - No doubt about the source's authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency. History of complete reliability.
B Usually reliable - Minor doubts. History of mostly valid information.
C Fairly reliable - Doubts. Provided valid information in the past.
D Not usually reliable - Significant doubts. Provided valid information in the past.
E Unreliable - Lacks authenticity, trustworthiness, and competency. History of invalid information.
F Reliability unknown - Insufficient information to evaluate reliability. May or may not be reliable.

Information credibility
Rating Description
1 Confirmed by independent Sources - Logical, consistent with other relevant information, confirmed by independent sources.
2 Probably true - Logical, consistent with other relevant information, not confirmed.
3 Possibly true - Reasonably logical, agrees with some relevant information, not confirmed.
4 Doubtfully True - Not logical but possible, no other information on the subject, not confirmed.
5 Improbable Not logical, contradicted by other relevant information.
6 Difficult to say - The validity of the information can not be determined.
Posted by Besoeker 2023-11-11 10:31||   2023-11-11 10:31|| Front Page Top

#7 Example: F6 = CNN, Karine Jean-Pierre, Fauci, Yellon or Antnie Blinken statements and reporting.
Posted by Besoeker 2023-11-11 10:39||   2023-11-11 10:39|| Front Page Top

#8 More often E5 my friend!
Posted by NoMoreBS 2023-11-11 19:10||   2023-11-11 19:10|| Front Page Top

22:10 swksvolFF
21:58 Anomalous Sources
21:54 Anomalous Sources
20:01 SteveS
19:59 trailing wife
19:30 Frank G
19:24 Jay_Dubya
19:19 NoMoreBS
19:10 NoMoreBS
18:49 Tom
18:46 Tom
18:43 Tom
18:34 Tom
18:23 Frank G
18:16 Procopius2k
18:10 M. Murcek
18:08 M. Murcek
18:08 M. Murcek
18:03 NN2N1
17:40 Grom the Reflective
17:30 Skidmark
17:14 Skidmark
16:58 Jerens Black9355
16:49 Jerens Black9355
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com