Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 06/21/2025 View Fri 06/20/2025 View Thu 06/19/2025 View Wed 06/18/2025 View Tue 06/17/2025 View Mon 06/16/2025 View Sun 06/15/2025
1
2025-06-21 Home Front: Politix
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson blasts 'narrow-minded' judging on Supreme Court: ANALYSIS
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2025-06-21 06:13|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [223 views ]  Top

#1 I be right! All you'all be wrong.
Posted by Besoeker 2025-06-21 06:23||   2025-06-21 06:23|| Front Page Top

#2 'Narrow Minded' actually adhering to the Constitution designed by the Founders in limiting federal power and reach.
Posted by Procopius2k 2025-06-21 06:52||   2025-06-21 06:52|| Front Page Top

#3 It's not "textualism" just because she says it is, although I give her credit for using a big word. The case of the 14th Amendment (at the Supreme Court) will be interesting. The discussions will be primarily about the authors' intent rather than modern interpretation.
Posted by The Walking Unvaxed 2025-06-21 07:58||   2025-06-21 07:58|| Front Page Top

#4 /\ The discussions will be primarily about the authors' intent rather than modern interpretation.

No truer words ever spoken.
Posted by Besoeker 2025-06-21 08:02||   2025-06-21 08:02|| Front Page Top

#5 In Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Jackson dissented:

“I worry that the fuel industry’s gain comes at a reputational cost for this Court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests,” she wrote. Link
Posted by Bobby 2025-06-21 08:43||   2025-06-21 08:43|| Front Page Top

#6 She really did just say forget law and proceedings, do what I say.

Here's yet another Black Woman In Charge, bringing down all Black People, shrieking about how reading is racist.
Posted by swksvolFF 2025-06-21 09:50||   2025-06-21 09:50|| Front Page Top

#7 You are supposed to rule on existing laws from the bench, not make law from the bench.

Disbar her and run her out of town on a rail.
Posted by DarthVader 2025-06-21 11:25||   2025-06-21 11:25|| Front Page Top

#8 "I check more boxes than you do!"
Posted by Matt 2025-06-21 11:54||   2025-06-21 11:54|| Front Page Top

#9 
Posted by swksvolFF 2025-06-21 14:45||   2025-06-21 14:45|| Front Page Top

#10 "Fundamentally non-serious" choice.
Posted by Crusader 2025-06-21 15:12||   2025-06-21 15:12|| Front Page Top

23:06 trailing wife
23:01 Ebbainter Jaique5484
22:49 DarthVader
22:47 ACA JOE
22:45 Fairbanks
22:34 SteveS
22:16 Fairbanks
21:21 Woodrow
20:50 swksvolFF
20:48 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:44 swksvolFF
20:41 Ebbuger Whuque4103
20:29 3dc
20:22 3dc
18:43 49 Pan
18:42 49 Pan
17:20 Cesare
16:43 Crusader
15:53 Grom the Affective
15:52 Grom the Affective
15:47 trailing wife
15:46 trailing wife
15:34 A joe
15:14 Crusader
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com