Abdul Rakib Hasan | Abdul Rakid Hasan | al-Qaeda | Down Under | 20050816 | ||||
Abdul Rakib Hasan | Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah | Down Under | 20051115 | Link | ||||
Abdul Rakib Hasan | al-Qaeda | Down Under | 20050730 |
Down Under |
Five Sydney terrorists jailed |
2010-02-15 |
![]() Justice Anthony Whealy, who presided over a trial that began in November 2008, said in the Supreme Court at Parramatta that the offence of conspiring to commit an act in preparation for a terrorist act or acts was higher on the scale of criminality. He said today that he was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that each of the offenders had intended that the end result of their actions would be serious damage to property, carrying with it the risk of death or injury to the public. The men are not allowed to be named for legal reasons. The first man, 44, regarded as the principal organiser of the conspiracy, was sentenced to a maximum term of 28 years in prison, commencing on November 8, 2005, when he was arrested, with a non-parole period of 21 years. The second man 36, was sentenced to 27 years in prison from the time of his arrest in 2005, with a non-parole period of 20 years and three months. The third man, 40, was sentenced to 20 years in prison from the time of his arrest in 2005, with a non-parole period of 19 years and six months. The fourth man, 34, was also sentenced to 26 years in prison from the time of his arrest in 2005, with a non-parole period also of 19 years and six months. The fifth man, 25, who entered the conspiracy later than the others and was not arrested until September 21, 2006, received a term of 23 years, backdated to the time of his arrest with a non-parole period of 17 years and three months. The five men were among nine people arrested in a huge police and ASIO crackdown in 2005 and 2006. Of those, four have pleaded guilty to lesser offences and have been dealt with. The five who elected to go on trial pleaded not guilty and were convicted on October 16 last year. Justice Whealy said in his remarks on sentencing today that the jury had apparently been satisfied that each of the five had intended that acts be carried in Australia involving the detonation of explosives. He said the jury must have been satisfied that this was for the purpose of carrying out violent jihad so as to coerce the Australian government to change its policies regarding the invasion of Muslim countries. Justice Whealy said that what was particularly appalling was the videos and other extremist materials that had been found in possession of the accused. He said that some of the videos involving executions were so horrific that they had not been shown to the jury. Instead, only a written summary had been provided. Each of the offenders, Justice Whealy said, had been driven by a religious zeal, and the fact that it was a conspiracy meant that it took on a life of its own and was more menacing than the individual acts of the participants. He said that chemicals for bomb making and ammunition had been accumulated in preparation for a terrorist act or acts and he noted that there was "a wide range" of material that had never been recovered and might be available to terrorists in future conspiracies. The five accused wore traditional clothing and four of them wore prayer caps. During the judge's summing up, some of them smiled and, during breaks in his address, some of them exchanged pleasantries with each other. After the sentences were pronounced and the judge left the bench, all five broke into smiles. Two men shouted from the back of the court in Arabic: "Be patient. Allah is with you." |
Link |
Down Under |
Trial begins for five accused in terror plot in Australia |
2008-11-11 |
Five men accused of plotting a terrorist attack went on trial Tuesday with prosecutors alleging that the men were Islamic extremists who stockpiled weapons and explosive chemicals in a plan to wage violent jihad against non-Muslims. After eight months of pretrial arguments and closed-door hearings, federal prosecutors began laying out their case against the five men, aged 24 to 43, before the New South Wales Supreme Court in western Sydney amid strict security. Khaled Cheikho, Moustafa Cheikho, Mohamed Ali Elomar, Abdul Rakib Hasan and Mohammed Omar Jamal were arrested in November 2005 and charged with conspiring to commit acts in preparation for a terrorist act, or acts. They have pleaded not guilty. Prosecutor Richard Maidment told the jury that the men were Islamic radicals who had obtained or sought to obtain large quantities of household and industrial chemicals that could be used to make explosives, and had also stockpiled guns and ammunition in preparation for the alleged attack, which was intended partly as retaliation for Australias support of the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Police raids on the mens homes had also uncovered a substantial cache of extremist material, Mr. Maidment said, including bombmaking instructions, graphic videos of ritual beheadings and images of the hijacked planes smashing into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. The men possessed large quantities of literature which supported indiscriminate killing, mass murder and martyrdom in pursuit of violent jihad, and which apparently sought to provide religious justification for conduct of that nature, Mr. Maidment said, according to local media at the court. The men, who face possible life sentences if convicted, are accused of launching the conspiracy between July 2004 and their arrests in November 2005. Specific details of the alleged plot or potential targets have not been released. Details of the case have been shrouded in secrecy. In the months leading up to Tuesdays opening, presiding Justice Anthony Whealy issued some 65 written judgments, all but two of which - one on the location of the trial and the other on the configuration of the courtroom - were suppressed. In his instructions to the jury, the judge said that although the five men were being tried together, jurors would have to weigh the circumstantial case presented by the prosecution to reach individual verdicts for each defendant. He also warned the jurors not to prejudge the defendants because of their religion or appearance. You must take prejudice and bias out of this trial altogether, the judge said. Its an obvious truism for me to tell you that the Muslim religion is not on trial here. |
Link |
Down Under |
Australian court told six sought "violent jihad" |
2008-10-27 |
Six alleged Sydney jihadists obtained, or sought to acquire, a stockpile of chemical weapons capable of causing "substantial damage and loss of life", potential jurors have been told. Counsel for the prosecution Richard Maidment SC said they were driven to wage violent jihad against the Australian public by fervent Islamic beliefs in martyrdom. Mr Maidment on Monday addressed the first 220 potential jurors at the trial of Bradley Umar Sariff Baladjam, 31, Khaled Cheikho, 35, Moustafa Cheikho, 31, Mohamed Ali Elomar, 43, Abdul Rakib Hasan, 39, and 24-year-old Mohammed Omar Jamal. The six have pleaded not guilty to conspiring to commit acts in preparation for a terrorist act, and are standing trial in the NSW Supreme Court. Offering a "thumbnail sketch" of his case, Mr Maidment said the accused were among a group of at least nine western and south-western Sydney men allegedly planning one or more terror-related acts. Literature, images and video were found in their possession which advocated the activities of "notorious persons such as Osama bin Laden" and the pursuit of martyrdom through jihad. "Each of these men were apparently strong adherents to the Islamic faith and were each motivated by a particular religious, political or ideological cause, that being the pursuit of violent jihad," Mr Maidment said. "In essence that meant that the accused were motivated to carry out violent activities against members of the Australian community as a whole, in pursuit of their ideals." Mr Maidment said the men obtained large quantities of firearms and ammunition between July 2004 and November 2005, as well as significant amounts of chemicals such as acetone and hydrogen peroxide. They also had detailed written instructions on how to manufacture explosives "capable of causing substantial damage and loss of life", he said. Justice Whealy said the trial was expected to run for up to a year, with up to 700 witnesses, with brief breaks over Christmas and Easter. Five thousand potential jurors have been summonsed, and the selection process is expected to take the rest of the week. The two-week crown opening is expected to begin next Wednesday, November 5. |
Link |
Down Under | |||||
Australian Terror suspect denied visit to dying Mother | |||||
2008-05-30 | |||||
A man facing terrorism charges has been refused permission for further visits to the hospital bedside of his dying mother, the NSW Department of Corrective Services says.
| |||||
Link |
Down Under | ||
Terrorism accused refuse to stand | ||
2007-06-01 | ||
Nine men accused of preparing a terrorist act on Australian soil have ignited another debate, refusing to stand before the NSW Supreme Court and enter their not guilty pleas. The men, who were allegedly inspired by the September 11 attacks to plan terrorist attacks here, were brought amid tight security to the Supreme Court yesterday. They were formally arraigned, charged with conspiring to prepare a terrorist act, or acts, between July 8, 2004 and November 8, 2005. Before Justice Anthony Whealy read out the indictment to the men - many dressed in traditional Islamic robes - he asked them to stand and enter their pleas. A lawyer for some of the men, Adam Houda, said there was a problem. "The accused have a problem with standing up not to be disrespectful but it's a religious observance," Mr Houda said. Justice Whealy said he would not insist. "Judges are made of more robust material but a jury might take a different view." However, the men's stance concerned some Muslims. "[Standing up] is not out of respect for the judge, but for the institution of the court regardless of whether its Sharia or any other court," said a lawyer, Irfan Yusuf. "I can't see why these boys would have any problems. I am not aware of any mainstream religious scholars or jurists saying the accused should not stand."
The logistical problems of the trial emerged yesterday, with the realisation that jury members may need to devote much of 2008 to hear the cases against the men. Justice Whealy, who presided over the trial of Faheem Khalid Lodhi last year, set the trial down for February, saying he did not want it to spill over into 2009. | ||
Link |
Down Under |
9 face trial in Australia terror plot |
2007-05-01 |
Nine men accused of stockpiling bomb-making chemicals and vowing to avenge perceived injustices against Muslims have been ordered to stand trial for Australia's largest alleged terrorist conspiracy, a court official said Tuesday. Magistrate Michael Price ruled that the evidence was strong enough to be heard by a Supreme Court jury and referred the case to the higher court on June 1, said an official at Penrith Local Court, who spoke on condition of anonymity in line with policy. The nine men each are charged with conspiring between June 2004 and November 2005 to carry out a terrorist act. None of the suspects, who face a maximum penalty of life in prison if convicted, entered a plea, but their lawyers have said they maintain they are innocent. Prosecutors said at the pretrial hearing that the nine suspects bought unrestricted chemicals that can be used in making explosives, and downloaded instructions from the Internet that included how to mix the cocktail of agents used to make the bombs used in the deadly 2005 London subway attacks. Prosecutors allege the nine were devotees of a radical Muslim cleric sympathetic to Osama bin Laden, and struck a pact to launch a terrorist attack because they felt their religion was under attack. No planned target has been revealed, but police alleged the suspects had Australia's only nuclear reactor a small facility used to make radioactive medical supplies under surveillance. They were arrested in a series of 2005 raids in Sydney and the southern city of Melbourne, where cleric Abdul Nacer Benbrika and other followers also were detained and now face separate charges of belonging to a terrorist group. Authorities said police found transcripts of bin Laden speeches and other al-Qaida material, as well as videos of people being beheaded, in some of the suspects' homes. The nine suspects are Mohammed Ali Elomar, Mazen Touma, Abdul Rakib Hasan, Khaled Cheikho, Moustafa Cheikho, Khaled Sharrouf, Mirsad Mulahalilovic, Omar Baladjam and Mohammed Jamal. |
Link |
Down Under |
Chemicals stockpiled for 'jihad on Sydney' |
2007-03-09 |
NINE suspected terrorists allegedly stockpiled a cache of deadly chemicals as they plotted a "violent jihad" on Sydney. In what is being described as the biggest terror trial in Australia's history, Penrith Local Court yesterday heard for the first time detailed allegations against the nine alleged Muslim extremists. The men stand accused of plotting a massive terrorist attack on Sydney - with Lucas Heights nuclear plant the possible target. In her opening address, prosecutor Wendy Abraham QC claimed preparations for an attack involved chemical stockpiling, the collation of "extremist" documents and specialised terrorist training. The court heard documents written in Arabic showed step-by-step instructions on how to make deadly explosives such as TATP and HMTD. The materials were allegedly found during searches of their homes and vehicles, with one found hidden in a children's book called Choice Islamic Stories. Bradley Umar Sariff Baladjam, Khaled Cheikho, Moustafa Cheikho, Mohamed Ali Elomar, Abdul Rakib Hasan, Mohammed Omar Jamal, Mirsad Mulahalilovic, Khaled Sharrouf and Mazen Touma faced court together for the first time since their arrest during ASIO raids in November 2005. The court heard Touma had told his mother he was about to enter paradise and that "Allah's satisfaction is more important than yours". "He (Touma) spoke of Allah giving him a paradise for martyrdom," Ms Abraham said. "It is alleged he said his mother should be patient because tomorrow her children would be in paradise." The Crown alleges the defendants each played a role in conspiring to prepare for a terrorist attack by equipping themselves with the "knowledge, ability and means to prepare and plan for a terrorist attack". "They believed Islam was under attack and and in defence of Islam and other Muslims ... the primary tool was violent jihad," Ms Abraham said. The defendants allegedly obtained or attempted to obtain chemicals and necessary items that could be used in the construction of explosives. These include 50 litres of hydrochloric acid, 200 litres of sulphuric acid and more than 60 litres of hydroperoxide. It is also alleged the group had large amounts of "extremist" and instructional material as well as firearms and ammunition used in SKS and AK47 semi-automatic weapons. The court heard how the men shopped at chemists, hardware stores and discount shops in Sydney and Melbourne for chemicals and items such as PVC piping. The committal hearing, expected to run for at least two months, continues today. |
Link |
Down Under |
Heavy security as Aussie terror plot hearings begin |
2007-03-05 |
![]() A hearing to determine whether there is enough evidence to go to trial began Monday at the Penrith District Court amid tight security. Armed police stood guard at the courthouse and patrolled nearby streets, while lawyers, journalists and members of the public underwent rigorous security checks before being allowed to enter the building. But James Renwick, a lawyer for the national spy agency, the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, told Magistrate Michael Price that he would request that the hearing be closed to the public for national security reasons. Price did not immediately rule on the request. The nine accused -Mohammed Ali Elomar, Mazen Touma, Abdul Rakib Hasan, Khaled Cheikho, Moustafa Cheikho, Khaled Sharrouf, Mirsad Mulahalilovic, Omar Baladjam and Mohammed Jamal -did not appear in court Monday, but were likely to attend Tuesday when lawyers present the evidence against them. A police report handed to the court at the time of the arrests claimed the men had attended "jihad" training courses in the Australian Outback and were assembling chemicals, detonators, digital timers and batteries to carry out a major bomb attack. The Lucas Height nuclear reactor, a facility used to make radioactive medical supplies on the southern edge of Sydney, Australia's most populous city, was listed as a possible target. The report also alleged several members of the group took "jihad training" trips to the Outback town of Bourke, about 650 kilometers (400 miles) northwest of Sydney, in mid-2005. The hearing is expected to last up to three months. |
Link |
Down Under |
Analysis of the thwarted Australian plot |
2005-12-04 |
Since September 11, 2001, Australians have been warned that an attack on Australian soil by al-Qaeda or its allies is probable, if not inevitable. In October, ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organization) released its 2004/05 annual report, which warned of the risk of âhome grownâ terrorists. Despite evidence of networks, training and preliminary planning for terrorist attacks in Australia before and after 9/11, several raids and waves of anti-terrorist legislation, only one personâJack Rocheâhas been convicted of terrorist offences in Australia to date. This has led some in the country to speculate that the domestic terrorist threat was exaggerated. But the thwarting of a terrorist plot in its late planning stages in early November shows that the threat is very real. Early on November 9, State and Federal police raided dozens of properties in Melbourne and Sydney, arresting 17 men and seizing large quantities of alleged precursor chemicals, laboratory equipment, instruction manuals on the production of the explosive triacetone triperoxide (TATP), and maps and photographs of potential targets. One suspect, Omar Baladjam, was shot in the neck after firing at police outside a Sydney mosque. An eighteenth suspect, Melbournian Izzydeen Atik was arrested in Sydney on November 11, apparently on a liaison visit. Police and political leaders in both States declared that the operation had foiled an imminent attack of enormous magnitude. The group was under close surveillance by ASIO and Federal and State police for at least 16 months, with hundreds of hours of conversations recorded. Several of the Melbourne suspects were targeted in raids in June 2005. It is alleged that those arrested in both States constituted an unnamed terrorist organization led by a 45 year-old from Melbourne, Abdul Nacer Benbrika (aka Abu Bakr). Benbrika had previously called Osama bin Laden a âgreat manâ and claims to support the aims of Algeriaâs Salafist Group for Call and Combat (GSPC) [1]. Benbrika came to Australia from his native Algeria on a temporary visa in May 1989. He eventually obtained Australian citizenship, claiming that he faced persecution if he returned to Algeria. Respected Sheikh Fehmi Naji al-Imam provided him with a reference letter, but now says he regrets doing so. In Australia, Benbrika followed a trajectory of increasing radicalism. He fell into the orbit of radical Melbourne Sheikh Mohamed Omran, and was apparently inspired by Abu Qatada, whom Omran brought to Australia on a speaking tour in 1994. Benbrika determined to become an Islamic scholar, but instead of studying jurisprudence at a recognized Islamic University, he taught himself, largely cut off from the wider community. He began preaching at Omranâs Brunswick mosque, attracting a small following. A number of those arrested in Melbourne in the recent raids are known to have attended the Brunswick mosque. Several years ago, Benbrika broke away from Omran, taking the most violent, radical elements of the congregation with him. Later, he was able to extend his influence into New South Wales, creating a second cell. Benbrikaâs Sydney cell achieved an advanced stage of planning much more quickly than his Melbourne cell, and was much more diverse, even though Benbrika had been recruiting for longer in Melbourne. This suggests a broader, more experienced and well-connected network already existed in Sydney. It is therefore worthwhile to analyze the two cells separately. At least seven of the Melbourne suspects are the children of Lebanese immigrants, and some began practicing Islam only 18 months ago (see addendum at end of this article). Most are tradesmen and laborers. Some have previous police records for minor crimes, and two of the suspectsâHany Taha and Izzydeen Atikâallegedly operated a âcar rebirthingâ operation to raise funds for the group. The Melbourne suspects allegedly used a Kinglake property and various commercial hunting properties for paramilitary training. Only convert Shane Gregory Kent (aka Yasin) is thought to have trained abroad. In mid-2001, he allegedly trained at a Jaish-e-Mohamed camp in Pakistan before proceeding to al-Qaedaâs al-Faruq camp. He was accompanied by another Australian convert, âAbu Jihad,â who is believed to have been the main informant against the Benbrika group. It has been alleged that Melbourne suspects were filming the Australian Stock Exchange and Flinders Street Station, Melbourneâs landmark central train exchange. During the November raids, officers reportedly found maps of Casselden Place, the Melbourne headquarters of the Departments of Foreign Affairs and Trade and Immigration. In addition, the prosecution claims that Abdulla Merhi was recorded asking Benbrika for permission to become a suicide bomber. The men arrested in Melbourne have been charged with membership of a terrorist organization, except Benbrika who has been charged with leading a terrorist organization. In addition, a number of minor property crime charges have been laid. Although the evidence suggests an intention to conduct terrorist attacks against major landmarks, the Melbourne group made little progress. However, they maintained close contact with the Sydney suspects by telephone and through regular visits. In conversations recorded before the raids, the Melbourne cell members reportedly complained that the Sydney cell was ahead of them in planning an attack. An increase in the frequency of these inter-state communications was apparently the trigger for the raids in Melbourne and Sydney [2]. The Sydney raids turned up hundreds of liters of chemicals, laboratory equipment, 165 detonators, 132 digital timers, batteries, firearms and ammunition. The suspectsâ homes also contained al-Qaeda literature and bomb-making manuals [3]. Chemical suppliers have told the media that they tipped off the authorities about several attempts to purchase large quantities of hydrogen peroxide, acetone, hydrochloric and/or sulphuric acid and hexamine, which can be used in explosives [4]. It appears the suspects were turning the Sydney house into a bomb-making factory. Almost all the Sydney suspects have been charged with conspiring to manufacture explosives in preparation for a terrorist attack [5], a charge that did not exist until four days before the raids. The Federal Government passed an emergency amendment to the Crimes Act after being briefed by ASIO and the Federal Police about the possibly imminent attacks. The amendment triggered accusations that the government was using the terrorist issue as a smokescreen for its contentious industrial relations laws, despite the fact that the opposition leader and relevant State Premiers were briefed and supported the change. It was felt the amendment was necessary because the Act, as it stood, could be read as requiring the prosecution to prove the specific detailsâsuch as the intended date and targetâif the alleged attack. This is not to say that authorities had no idea what targets the suspects might have been considering. In December 2004, three of the Sydney suspects (Mazen Touma, Mohamed Elomar and Abdul Rakib Hasan) were apprehended by police within the 1.6km exclusion zone around Sydneyâs Lucas Heights nuclear reactor. A padlock on a gate leading to the reactorâs reservoir had been cut. Laskar-e-Taiba agent Willie Brigitte, deported in October 2003, had also considered an attack on the reactor. Although Lucas Heights is a small, medical research reactor that poses negligible risk, the suspectsâ presence at the site raises disturbing questions about the groupâs intentions. While the Melbourne suspects give the impression of being a group of hot-heads who in some cases joined the plot because their friends and relatives did, the Sydney suspects are generally older and more experienced. Several were trained by Laskar-e-Taiba or have been connected with suspected terrorist operatives in the past. Khaled Sharroufâs family was close to Willie Brigitte and the Australian he married. Sharroufâs brother-in-law, Mohamed Ndaw, was extradited to his native Senegal in 2004 on security grounds. Abdul Rakib Hasan allegedly set up three safe houses for Brigitte in Sydney. In July 2005 he was charged with two counts of lying to ASIO about his close contact with Brigitte. Hasan was also named as a key player in a series of alleged terrorist training camps in the Blue Mountains. These were run by Malaysian man Asman Hashim, who also set up training camps for Jemaah Islamiyah in the Southern Philippines [6]. Another alleged terrorist training camp was discovered in the NSW Southern Tablelands in 2000, after neighboring farmers reported explosions and automatic gunfire. Three of the four owners of the property are brothers of another of the men arrested in the Sydney raids, Mohamed Ali Elomar. The brothers told police that the property was used by Sydneyâs hardline Islamic Youth Movement, but only for hunting trips [7]. The arrests and resulting evidence from the November 8 raids support the view that a terrorist attack on Australian soil is a real possibility. They also demonstrate that Australian security agencies have learned important lessons since 2000, when ASIO failed to return calls from would-be terrorist Jack Roche. The enhanced effectiveness of Australian security agencies considerably reduces the likelihood of success for any future terrorist plot in Australia. The presence of a largely home-grown terrorist organization in Australia may be seen as part of an international trend towards the self-recruitment of terrorists. However, the uneven development of plots in Sydney and Melbourne demonstrates that training, experience and international connections continue to be important factors in determining whether, and how quickly, a terrorist organization can make the transition from intention to capability. |
Link |
Down Under | |||||
Man 'lied to ASIO over Brigitte' | |||||
2005-11-16 | |||||
![]()
| |||||
Link |
Down Under |
Butcher charged with lying to ASIO |
2005-07-30 |
![]() At least two of the Melbourne men are understood to have been detained by ASIO for up to 24 hours. ASIO lawyers can question witnesses for a maximum of three eight-hour blocks. The use of the secret hearing powers can be revealed because the 28-day life of the questioning warrants has now expired. However, no details about what was discussed at the hearings can be publicly disclosed for the next two years. Anyone found guilty of breaching the ban faces five years in jail. The ASIO raids in both cities followed an eight-month inquiry into a group of men whom police suspect may have been plotting attacks against two Melbourne train stations and the Australian Stock Exchange building. Police suspect some members of the group also scoped harbourside targets in Sydney in the weeks leading up to New Year's Eve 2003. They believe one former member of the group was Saleh Jamal, who has been arrested in Lebanon on terror charges after allegedly fleeing Sydney while on bail early last year using another man's passport. The alleged plot is not linked to Brigitte, who is now detained in Paris under French anti-terror laws. Brigitte has been accused of being a senior al-Qa'ida member with strong links to the terror group's outlawed Kashmiri affiliate, Lashkar-e-Taiba. Mr Hasan faces two counts of making a false or misleading statement under an ASIO questioning warrant on November 8, 2003. Each charge carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison. He is now the second man facing charges in relation to Brigitte's alleged plot to launch a terror attack in Australia after his arrival in May 2003. The other faces a Supreme Court trial in February on a charge of committing an act in preparation for a terror attack. Brigitte has told French anti-terror judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere that he met Mr Hasan in Sydney. He has reportedly identified Mr Hasan from a photo shown to him in Paris in December 2003. Mr Hasan, who works at a Halal butchery in Sydney's Islamic heartland, was bailed to appear again on August 16. He was ordered to surrender his passport and report each Monday to Campsie police station in the city's southwest. |
Link |