Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg
Zakaria Zbeida Zakaria Zbeida al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades Terror Networks 20040709 Link

Israel-Palestine-Jordan
To Paleos, third intifada as unlikely as peace
2010-08-31
They claim otherwise, but I keep thinking, 'hudna' ...
RAMALLAH, West Bank - While the prospect of peace between Israel and the Palestinians appears remote, so too does the chance of open conflict -- for now at least.

A repeat of the Palestinian Intifada, or uprising, that erupted in 2000 when U.S. President Bill Clinton's peace diplomacy failed, is ruled out in the near-term by many Palestinians, including those who fought in the last one. Weak and divided, the Palestinians appear neither willing nor able to wage another sustained, organised uprising against Israeli occupation in the foreseeable future.

Over 500 Israeli civilians died in 140 Palestinian suicide bomb attacks from 2000 to 2007. More than 4,500 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces in the same period. Many Palestinians question what the bloodshed achieved.
It achieved financial separation -- which sent Palestinian living standards crashing down toward pre-June '67 levels -- the building of the security wall, and a uniting of Israeli opinion from left to right that the Palestinians are not trustworthy negotiating partners.
The most critical say the tactics used in the uprising set back their cause in the court of world public opinion.
How perceptive of them.
The Western-backed Palestinian so called government in the West Bank -- which would be the main theatre in any future Intifada -- is categorically opposed to any repeat. Their retrained security forces have taken action against those who act or think differently.
"We don't want no Operation Cast Lead here!"
That has been reflected in a West Bank security situation which Jewish settlers say has never been better. Half a million of them live in the West Bank and Israeli-occupied land around Jerusalem -- land the Palestinians seek for a state.
And which they aren't likely to get. Hence the Jewish neighborhoods.
In another sign of calm, Israel this month took down protective blast walls put up in 2002 in Gilo, an urban settlement on the outskirts of Jerusalem that came under fire from the West Bank during the Intifada.

Relative, if fragile, stability has even reached the Gaza Strip. Run by the Hamas movement, it remains an "enemy entity" to Israel.
Which is another way of saying that Hamas considers itself an enemy of Israel.
But the Iranian-backed Islamists are enforcing a de facto ceasefire that has somewhat reduced curbed rocket fire into Israel.

Hamas's critics argue that the group's current policy differs little from that of Abbas's Palestinian Authority: it is seeking to halt attacks that will draw Israeli reprisals. That's a comparison Hamas rejects. Part of an alliance including Syria and Hezbollah, Hamas is still committed to fighting Israel but argues that Gaza is in need of calm to recover from a devastating Israeli offensive 20 months ago.
"It's a hudna, dammit, not a de facto surrender!"
Hamas activists are regularly detained by West Bank security forces trained with U.S. support. The territory would be the main front in a future Intifada because there are no Israeli settlers or soldiers in Gaza. Israel withdrew them in 2005.

"The Palestinian Authority has taken many steps to destroy the roots of any new Intifada," said Zakaria al-Qaq, a political analyst. "Not just by targeting the Islamists, but also any party that might think of doing anything."

Political commentator Samih Shabib added that there is little appetite among Palestinians for another uprising. "There is no popular conviction that an Intifada is the right thing and there is no party in the field to launch it," he said.

"The Intifada had deep lessons for the Palestinians: that the use of weapons will lead to Israeli incursions, killing, destruction, economic, political, social siege and without any benefit," he said.
This doesn't mean that the Paleos have learned their lesson; just that they'll be more crafty next time ...
The uprising erupted when Clinton failed to forge a deal between the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Ehud Barak, then Israel's prime minister.
Mr. Arafat literally ran away, rather than agree to an offer that was 90% of what he'd demanded. I don't think this is President Clinton's failure.
Palestinian leaders at the time declared the Intifada as the route to liberation. Unlike the first Intifada, which began in 1987 and was defined by confrontations between stone-throwing Palestinian youths and Israeli soldiers, the Palestinians resorted to guns and explosives in the second uprising. Suicide bombers struck inside Israel itself.

Zakaria Zbeida, a prominent figure in the uprising, said another Intifada was inevitable unless the Palestinians could secure an acceptable peace agreement -- something he believes unlikely. But it would need time to break out.

"Maybe in four, five or seven years. But in the near future, no," said Zbeida, who was spokesman for the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade in the West Bank. "Resistance needs a political umbrella. That is not present now," he said.
Link


Terror Networks
Arafat’s fighters condemn corruption
2004-07-09
JERUSALEM -- The armed wing of Yasser Arafat’s Fatah political movement has called for a comprehensive campaign against corruption in the Palestinian Authority, recommending that Arafat relinquish some of his powers and that militant groups -- including Islamic organizations -- be granted a formal governing voice, according to a report obtained by the Washington Post. The proposal presented to senior Palestinian officials by the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades is the first formal attempt by an armed resistance group to seek a political role in the Palestinian Authority since the current uprising against Israel began nearly four years ago.

The document calls for the expulsion and prosecution of government officials involved in corruption, a wholesale purge of relatives and cronies of senior officials from government payrolls and a halt to the practice of government officials monopolizing sectors of the Palestinian economy to line ’’their private pockets."

The paper lashes out at ’’wives and sons and daughters of officials who are registered as employees and receive high salaries from the Palestinian Authority and are either at home or abroad." It attacks bureaucrats who ’’hold official titles and government jobs . . . when in fact they have no role other than the salary and position." It demands ’’eradication of the corruption in most of the PLO embassies and representatives" overseas.

Some Palestinian officials described the appeal as a major shift in the strategy of militant fighters and one of the most blistering internal criticisms yet of corruption in the Palestinian government. ’’The impact of this initiative is that for the first time, something is coming from the ground up. It has credibility," said Ahmad Ghunaim, a member of Fatah’s most influential governing councils and a representative of the movement’s wing of young reformers.

Zakaria Zbeida, who heads the al-Aqsa group in the northern West Bank city of Jenin, said al-Aqsa leaders in the West Bank and Gaza Strip crafted the proposal partially in response to Israel’s announced plan to withdraw soldiers and Jewish settlers from Gaza. ’’We want to take part in this stage and not have the political process bypass us," Zbeida said at a hideout in the Jenin refugee camp. ’’We come with this initiative to prove we are not just a group of fighters throwing bullets here and there. . . . We are ready to sit and talk."

The al-Aqsa document urges the separation of powers between the Palestinian Authority and the umbrella Palestine Liberation Organization, saying ’’it is inconceivable" that both organizations be headed by the same person. Arafat is chairman of the PLO executive committee and president of the Palestinian Authority.

’’There’s no doubt what it’s calling for is significant," said Khalil Shikaki, a Palestinian pollster and political analyst. ’’This is a way of saying to Arafat that ’It’s time for you to step down as head of the Palestinian Authority.’ . . . It’s a clear indictment of the whole old guard." Some Palestinian officials said the entrenched Palestinian leadership was unlikely to accept al-Aqsa’s demands, which are far more detailed and wider in scope than reforms of the Palestinian Authority currently being sought by the United States, Israel, and other outside governments and institutions.

Spokesmen for Arafat and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel dismissed the document. Arafat’s spokesman, Nabil Abu Rudeineh, said it did not sound ’’serious." Raanan Gissin, a spokesman for Sharon, said the proposal represented a power struggle between Arafat loyalists and younger Palestinian leaders. Al-Aqsa, Gissin added, ’’will replace one regime of intimidation with another. . . . Those who are with them will benefit, and those who are against them will be shot in the street."
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-2 More