Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Great White North
Unrepentant Canadian gets 10 years for UK bomb plot
2009-03-13
First conviction under Canada's anti-terrorism law

Momin Khawaja, the first person to be sentenced under Canada's anti-terrorism law, was a determined Islamic jihadist who has shown no remorse, Justice Douglas Rutherford said yesterday as he handed the convicted terrorist 10 1/2 years in prison.

Acknowledging the historic moment, Rutherford said he wanted to send a message that terrorism in Canada won't be tolerated, but at least one expert said the judge failed by not handing out at least one life sentence to the Ottawa software developer. The Ottawa-born Khawaja, 29, has already spent five years behind bars, and must serve five years before he is eligible for parole.

"Momin Khawaja was clearly aware and knowledgeable of some of the terrorist activities," the judge said, pointing to Khawaja's association with internationally known Islamic terrorists, his work on remote-control detonating devices, his eager involvement in a terrorist training camp in Pakistan and his role in directly and indirectly financing terrorism from 2002 to 2004. Khawaja was the first person to be charged under the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act, pushed through Parliament following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the United States.

Khawaja, a former contract federal government employee, was convicted in the fall of five counts of financing and facilitating terrorism for providing cash to a group of British extremists, offering them lodging and other assistance, and undergoing training at the remote camp in Pakistan. He was also found guilty of two criminal offences related to building a remote-control device, known as the Hi-Fi Digimonster, meant to detonate bombs. Five associates of Khawaja, including bomb-plot ringleader Omar Khyam, were sentenced to prison in 2007 after being convicted in London of a foiled plot to target a nightclub, a construction firm, and gas, water and power utilities.

Rutherford told the court that Khawaja's activities were "directed at assisting his terrorist associates in a way that could only result in serious injury, death and destruction." Not once during his 27-day trial did Khawaja indicate he was "repentant for his misdeeds or willing to make amends," Rutherford said.

Even so, the judge ruled out a sentence of life in prison, saying he didn't consider Khawaja in the same league as the London bomb plotters, who were sentenced to life in jail. Rutherford added the sentence would have been longer if not for the glimmer of hope that Khawaja could be rehabilitated. The judge also took into account the fact Khawaja has been held in custody since his arrest by RCMP on March 29, 2004, at his home in Orleans.

The defence and Crown each said they are considering appealing the sentence. "That is a very severe and potentially appealable sentence," said Khawaja's lawyer, Lawrence Greenspon, who had asked that the sentence be limited to time already served.

Prosecutor David McKercher said the sentence was "less than the Crown was asking for" and that his team would consider the decision carefully" before deciding whether to appeal. McKercher had been seeking two life sentences, with an additional 44 to 58 years in prison. Greenspon accused the Crown of "creating an unrealistic expectation" among the public by asking for such a harsh sentence.

Wesley Wark, a University of Toronto professor who specializes in anti-terrorism issues, said Rutherford seemed to contradict himself when he repeatedly reinforced the seriousness of what Khawaja did, and then handed him a relatively light sentence, including three-month sentences for two of the terror-related charges. "The terrorism act, I think, has passed its test as an act," Wark said. "It works (because) Mr. Khawaja was convicted, but I think the real question at issue today was how to reach appropriate sentences for those people convicted.

"From my perspective the surprising thing is that Mr. Khawaja comes away with a relatively light sentence ... and certainly my expectation was that he would face at least one life sentence," Wark said.
Link


Great White North
Canadian guilty in plot to behead prime minister
2008-09-26
A Canadian man accused of participating in military exercises and firearms training as part of a group authorities say plotted to storm Parliament and behead the prime minister was found guilty Thursday.

The man's attorney says the plot was a "jihadi fantasy" and that his client knew nothing about it. A judge ruled Thursday that evidence of a terrorist group was "overwhelming." The man is the first person to be found guilty of a terrorist offense in Canada since the country enacted anti-terrorism laws in 2001.

The arrests of the 18 group members, known as the "Toronto 18," made headlines around the world and heightened fears in Canada, where people believe they are relatively immune from terrorist strikes. Prosecutors said there were plans to truck-bomb nuclear power plants and a building housing Canada's spy service. Seven of those arrested have since had their charges either withdrawn, or stayed. The trials of 10 adults, including the alleged ringleaders, have yet to begin. The young man was the first to go on trial.

Superior Court Justice John Sproat found the man guilty of knowingly participating in a terrorist group. As the 94-page judgment was handed down, the defendant's mother wept quietly in the back of the court. The man has not been identified because he was 17, a legal minor, when he was arrested in 2006. He is now 20.

Prosecutors argued he attended a training camp where he participated in military exercises and firearms training and that he knowingly participated in a potentially deadly conspiracy. He had pleaded not guilty to terrorism-related charges. Sproat rejected the defense argument that the plot was a "jihadi fantasy" that the defendant knew nothing about. "He clearly understood the camp was for terrorist purposes," he said.

The defense had cast the plot as "musings and fantasies" with no possibility of being carried out. "It might well have been said prior to Sept. 11, 2001 that a plan to kill thousands and destroy landmark buildings in lower Manhattan and Washington had no possibility of implementation," Sproat said.

Sproat rejected defense arguments that two camps organized by the alleged ringleaders were simply a religious retreat or recreational in nature. "Apparently benign activities may be used to identify and indoctrinate recruits," he said.

Sproat called the young man an "acolyte" of the "charismatic" ringleader. Evidence was clear the youth listened carefully to his mentor, the plot's ringleader, and wanted to please him, and therefore understood what the camps were about, the judge said.

Defense lawyer Mitchell Chernovsky said it's hard to know what sentence will be imposed but said his client was involved peripherally and doesn't have a criminal record. He faces a maximum 10-year sentence.

Wesley Wark, a University of Toronto professor and national-security expert, said the guilty verdict is the first test of Canada's anti-terrorism legislation and that it shows its a tough law. "You can be convicted for terrorism even if nothing particular happens as a result of a plot, even if the plot looks amateurish, even if you didn't fully know the details of the conspiracy you were a part of," he said.

The prosecution's star witness, Mubin Shaikh, infiltrated and spied on the alleged terror cell members before their arrests. Shaikh is a former Canadian army cadet. Shaikh said outside court that the youth should not have been found guilty. Shaikh called the man a "naive Muslim kid who fell into the wrong circle of Muslim kids. I don't believe he's a terrorist."

Shaikh, however, was happy the judge found his testimony about the alleged ringleaders credible. Shaikh received about $300,000 for infiltrating the group.

Sproat noted that the defense did not make any suggestion that the payments influenced Shaikh's evidence. Sproat said he found Shaikh to be a truthful and reliable witness, a development that doesn't bode well for the adults in their trials. "I've been telling the truth since day 1," Shaikh said. "I'm very happy that the judge validated that and confirmed that. That will carry through to the remaining adult trials."
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-2 More