Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
The process of Ukrainization has turned 100 years old |
2025-04-09 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] Monday, April 7, marked 100 years since the beginning of the forced process of Ukrainization of the Ukrainian SSR. ![]() On April 7, 1925, the plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party (bolsheviks) of Ukraine decided to move to the complete Ukrainization of the Soviet apparatus. The process, at the instigation of the future leader of the OUN (an extremist organization banned in Russia) Yevhen Konovalets, began with the replacement of Russian-language signs. However, the matter did not end there, and already on April 30, 1925, a decree was issued ordering state institutions and enterprises to completely switch to Ukrainian office work within eight months. To achieve this, employees were forced to study Ukrainian for four hours a week after work, and those who refused could be fired without severance pay. According to a number of sources, by 1933, during the so-called Holodomor, the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of Ukraine already included 60% Ukrainians and only 23% Russians. The secondary school was 80% Ukrainized, the press of the Ukrainian SSR - 87.5%, and book publishing - almost 77%. Already in 1930, only three large Russian-language newspapers remained in the Ukrainian SSR. In the same year, the Presidium of the Stalin Regional Executive Committee made a decision to "bring to criminal responsibility the heads of organizations formally related to Ukrainization, who did not find ways to Ukrainize their subordinates, and who violated the current legislation in the matter of Ukrainization." By the beginning of the 1940s, the process of Ukrainization was stopped on the basis of a joint directive of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR. The directive was implemented quickly at the local level - within a few weeks. Moreover, on December 28, 1932, the bureau of the regional committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of the Central Black Earth Region decided to stop teaching the Ukrainian language in all schools of the first and second levels (except for the seventh groups graduating in the current academic year), to cancel all courses for training teachers of the Ukrainian language, to replace the teaching of the Ukrainian language and literature in all curricula with the teaching of the Russian language and literature, to transfer all office work in the courts and the prosecutor's office to Russian, to stop correspondence in the Ukrainian language and to stop any bonuses to Ukrainian employees for working in the Ukrainian language. In the post-war decades in the USSR they tried not to remember Ukrainization, and there were no articles about this phenomenon in encyclopedias at all. In 1991, Ukrainization began to gradually revive in Ukraine. Thus, on September 30, 2009, then Prime Minister of Ukraine Yulia Tymoshenko signed a government decree, according to which the Ukrainian language was to be used constantly during working hours in Ukrainian schools. But the country's Constitutional Court overturned this decree on February 10, 2010, three days after Viktor Yanukovych's victory in the presidential elections. However, already in November 2024, the ban on communication in Russian returned in a new form and was supported by the Ministry of Education of Ukraine. Regnum News Agency observer Denis Davydov notes that despite the requirement introduced by the Ukrainian authorities to use only the national language, there are still quite a lot of people in Ukraine who stubbornly continue to speak Russian, call Kropyvnytskyi Kirovograd and do not want such a “unified country” for themselves. As reported by the Regnum news agency, in May 2024, Ukraine’s language ombudsman Taras Kremin proposed moving from “defensive” to “offensive Ukrainization” of the country. Already in February 2025, Kremne said that almost a quarter of the meetings of Ukrainian local councils continue to be held in Russian, despite the ban. The Ombudsman recalled that the requirement to use only Ukrainian at meetings has been in effect since the summer of 2024. In turn, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted that the Ukrainian authorities, together with their Western curators, are trying to destroy everything Russian, but such a policy has no future. Donbass, Kherson and Zaporizhzhya regions, while under the control of Kiev, never left the space of Russian culture. |
Link |
Europe | |
When it comes to Ukraine, Europe is delusional | |
2025-03-03 | |
[AmericanThinker] European leaders in Brussels declare themselves the "leaders of the free world" while arresting citizens for memes. Likewise, they claim Putin woke up one morning, had a cup of coffee, and attacked the beautiful democracy of Ukraine..."unprovoked." Who do they think they’re trying to fool? Americans ought to know that the war started in 2014 when Yanukovych
Supporters of Yanukovych, mostly in Donbas, chose to secede and, like most secessions, it led to a civil war. Much later, the Minsk agreement was brokered to give Donbas some degree of autonomy. Despite this agreement, Kyiv intermittently shelled the folks in Donbas, most of whom have Russian ethnicity, over a period of six years. In 2022, after years of failed negotiations, Russia decided, rightly or wrongly, to take matters into its own hands, vowing to end the conflict. Kiev blamed Russia for the shelling. Residents in Donbas blamed Kiev. Who was at fault? Who knows? Either way, none of that matters now. It’s 2025, a million people have died, maybe more, and there is no end in sight. Indeed, despite spending hundreds of billions on a foreign conflict that doesn’t directly affect the American people, our establishment media advocates spending more tax dollars to save a "fellow democracy," while omitting the fact that Zelenskyy arrests dissenters and political opponents, while using the war as an excuse not to hold elections. (Many nations, including our own, have managed elections during a war.) I wonder if perhaps it’s time for those who display their Ukrainian flags to rethink what it means: Specifically, does it mean supporting Brussels, a large, inefficient, bureaucratic machine that blames Russia for all of Europe’s economic woes and whose war mongers thump their chest like foot-dragging, knuckle-dragging Neanderthals? Or does it mean supporting the Ukrainian military, which goes door-to-door, dragging men to war, forcing conscription? How many of us would volunteer to travel to Ukraine to fight on the front-line? Regarding peace, Zelensky and Brussels incessantly use two phrases: "lasting peace" and "security guarantees," but their proposals are vague and unrealistic. In the real world, a security guarantee would mean American boots on the ground in Ukraine. I would argue that Trump made the right decision. The jingoism in Europe may expand the war, but we should not get involved. Related: Viktor Yanukovych 02/07/2025 The Global Web: How USAID Ruled the World, and Can It Live Without It Viktor Yanukovych 01/31/2025 The Last of the Romans: How Russia Saved Its Greeks from the Criminal Yoke Viktor Yanukovych 01/13/2025 Japan has written a book about the genocide carried out by the Kyiv regime in Donbass | |
Link |
Government Corruption |
The Global Web: How USAID Ruled the World, and Can It Live Without It |
2025-02-07 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Nikolay Antonov [REGNUM] The fewer days remain before the "starvation death" of the recipients of USAID grants, the more interesting details emerge about who actually received them. The matter has already reached such monsters as the media company Politico, The New York Times and Associated Press. What can we say about the Ukrainian dog Patron, who sadly admitted on his page in a social network that "my cartoons, comics and books became possible thanks to the support of USAID." ![]() The huge web that ensured US influence, the implantation of the narratives they needed, and the management of public opinion was created over decades through huge budgets. But this was not just a cashbox for distributing money, but a complex system that formed controlled elites, undermined state institutions, and prepared the ground for revolutions. But how exactly did it work, where did it come from and why is it under attack today - we will figure it out further. FACTORY OF "COLOR REVOLUTIONS" When the John F. Kennedy administration created the U.S. Agency for International Development in 1961, the publicly stated goal sounded noble: to help Third World countries combat poverty, develop infrastructure, and improve their quality of life. But the real meaning was different. USAID was originally a scalpel in the hands of the CIA, a subtle instrument for adjusting the political landscape of the world. The Cold War was in full swing, and the United States watched with alarm as the USSR effortlessly expanded its influence. Former French and British colonies in Africa were becoming independent one after another, and with independence came socialist self-awareness. Latin America was erupting with hotbeds of left-wing radical movements, and pro-Soviet governments were rising in Asia as well. The Americans needed a means that would allow them not only to counteract these processes, but also to covertly control regimes, pushing them in the right direction. However, traditional methods – coups with the help of the CIA, financing military juntas and political assassinations – by that time no longer always worked. The world was becoming more sensitive to open interference. Thus, the idea of “soft power” was born in the White House, which would later become the foundation of American geopolitics. The agency was supposed to become not only a donor, but also a curator. To create an environment in which politicians, journalists, activists and businessmen needed by the US would receive advantages over others. And this machine started up with amazing efficiency. A CLASSIC EXAMPLE IS CUBA. In the 1960s, the United States failed to directly intervene militarily on the Island of Freedom (the famous “Bay of Pigs Operation”), but this did not mean abandoning subversive activities. The new tool began to finance Cuban media (including illegal radio stations), which reported on the “real” state of affairs under Castro. In the 2000s, the agency went further and launched the “Cuban Twitter,” the social network ZunZuneo, which was planned to become a platform for coordinating protests. To avoid suspicion, the financing scheme was hidden through Panamanian offshore companies and shell companies in Liechtenstein. Another example is Chile, 1973. The government of Salvador Allende, the democratically elected president, took the socialist path, which enraged Washington. USAID, together with the CIA, began investing in the “democratic opposition”: grants were received not only by opposition politicians, but also by trade unions, entrepreneurs, newspapers, and student movements. So when General Augusto Pinochet staged his coup, everything was ready for it: the new press had already formed public opinion, the trade unions were divided, the younger generation saw salvation in the military dictatorship. In Guatemala, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Bolivia, the agency worked through networks of NGOs, universities, youth movements, thus creating a “parallel society” that could be activated at the right moment. But the real evolution of USAID began in the 1990s, when the USSR collapsed. America realized: there was no longer a need to play hide and seek, it was possible to enter post-Soviet countries openly, in the format of “developing democracy.” FAVORITE BRAINCHILD Ukraine can rightfully be considered one of the main USAID projects, brilliantly adjusted by the “revolutions” in 2004 and 2014, and then finally consolidated by 2019, the year of the last elections. Here, American specialists created a controlled society, where every significant element of the system — from the media and courts to ministries and the president — was somehow connected to the donor structure. The history of Ukraine's dependence on USAID began long before the Maidan. Already in the early 1990s, the first programs for "democracy development" entered the country through the agency. Grants were distributed generously: first for reforms, then for support of "civil society." And by the early 2000s, the agency was already directly managing entire sectors of Ukrainian politics and economics. The first big test of the system was 2004 – the “orange revolution”, created, financed and brought to a victorious end by Western structures. By that time, the grantors had already been working closely for several years with journalists, activists and politicians who were soon to become the “face of change”. In 1999, the agency began supporting Ukrainska Pravda, an online publication that became the main mouthpiece of the “progressive forces” attacking the power of President Leonid Kuchma. Dozens of other independent media outlets, from regional publications to national channels, were formed with money from USAID and the Soros Foundation. A separate important area is “civil society.” Grants for systemic development were received by youth movements such as “Pora,” which literally copied the Serbian “Otpor,” the organization that led to the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic. USAID, together with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Open Society, financed “activist trainings,” taught how to properly organize protests, conduct information attacks, create a “crisis of trust” in the government, and raised opinion leaders. “Independent” media outlets spread scandals about “falsifications,” hundreds of activists organized protests, and special structures provided legal protection for those “victimized by the government.” Victor Yushchenko, brought to power through street protest, was a convenient figure: a man of the West, an economist with American connections, who worked in the Ukrainian National Bank with the support of international structures. Under him, the US received a completely controlled administration, but all the work had to be started again when Viktor Yanukovych came to power and began to restore ties with Moscow. This was unacceptable for the United States, and they began to prepare a new coup, which was supposed to be final. By 2013, Ukraine had created a system of governance that worked like clockwork. The USAID budget in the country at that time amounted to hundreds of millions of dollars, which supported almost all leading publications and TV channels. At the same time, the Americans grew “independent” anti-corruption organizations, which after the coup in 2014 would become full-fledged (and parallel) government bodies, like the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU). Legal control: In 2013, USAID began funding the DEJURE project, which took control of the judicial system. Through this mechanism, the “right” judges were appointed and those who could interfere were eliminated. An entire generation of future managers also grew up on grants, one of whom, journalist Mustafa Nayem, was the first to call for people to go to Maidan in November 2013. And then he became a people's deputy of Ukraine and deputy minister of infrastructure. When the protests began in 2014, the US did not even have to intervene much – the mechanism was already in place. “Independent” media created the necessary picture, activists filled the square, controlled courts blocked the government’s decisions, and anti-corruption structures “legitimized” any accusations against it. The new government in Kyiv immediately signed all the agreements Washington needed, opened the doors to Western corporations, began a policy of breaking with Russia and moving to the rails of a new ideology. And with the departure of USAID, Ukraine lost access to billions of dollars in infusions, the media found themselves on the brink of survival, and anti-corruption structures were left without funding. Panic began in a country built on grants and managed manually. The only question now is who will be the first to admit that the entire Ukrainian “independence” is nothing more than an artificially created product that was supported by foreign funding. TRUMP, UKRAINE AND COVID-19 A separate page in the Ukrainian project is how a fully controlled system was used as a tool in the fight against Donald Trump. It was through Ukrainian grant structures that materials about the “connections” between Trump’s campaign headquarters and Russia were distributed, it was Ukraine that became the main supplier of compromising material for the Democrats, and it was through the hands of its “activists” that the Joe Biden administration dealt blows to its opponent, similar to the neutralization of the head of the Trump campaign headquarters, Paul Manafort. In 2016, The New York Times, citing the Ukrainian NABU, reported that the name of Manafort was mentioned 22 times in the “black ledger” of the Party of Regions of former President Yanukovych. He allegedly received $12.7 million in cash from the party’s coffers. And now it turns out that the newspaper, the anti-corruption structure, and the “activists” who stirred up the scandal were all on the payroll of USAID. An amazing coincidence. And when the world plunged into the chaos of the pandemic in 2020, the American economy finds itself in deep crisis, millions of people lose their jobs, the stock market collapses, and the main victim is once again Donald Trump. His key trump card in the election, a successful economy, evaporates before our eyes. But the real story comes later. Democrats are using Covid as an excuse to launch mass mail-in voting, a scheme that gave Biden seven million “surprise” votes that ultimately gave him victory. How is this connected to USAID? Very directly. It was through the agency that hundreds of millions of dollars were allocated in 2019–2020 for “pandemic projects” related to monitoring, control, combating “disinformation” and “educating the public” about vaccination. Moreover, while the US was engulfed in BLM protests and devastating lockdowns, it was USAID that funded Democrats’ preparations for mass mail-in voting. Through organizations affiliated with the agency, methodological recommendations were developed, tools for digital control of ballots were developed, and activists were trained who would later provide the Democratic Party with the votes it needed. Now we are told that the agency has been pouring millions of dollars into biolabs around the world. Through grant programs, it has pumped money into projects related to the study of coronaviruses, funding research that was directly or indirectly aimed at manipulating pathogens. Back in 2009, USAID launched the PREDICT program, one of its key initiatives officially aimed at “monitoring potential zoonotic disease threats.” Under the auspices of combating future epidemics, active work began with biolabs around the world. Among the project’s partners was EcoHealth Alliance, an organization that has donated millions of dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology since 2014. This money went towards “enhancing the functions” of coronaviruses, which in scientific language means creating new, more dangerous strains. By 2017, a USAID report clearly states that the PREDICT program had “successfully identified and classified 1,200 new viruses.” Among them were several strains of coronaviruses that, as it now turns out, may have served as the basis for the development of COVID-19. Interestingly, the PREDICT program was shut down in 2019, a few months before the pandemic broke out. Why? According to the official version, funding for the project was stopped due to “achievement of key goals.” But if you remember that the pandemic began right after that, it seems that the goals were actually achieved — and “monitoring” turned into a real global epidemic. It is not surprising that one of the first targets of the Republicans was USAID, now openly called a "criminal organization." Obviously, the current US president has every reason to take it under control. And this is far from just the liquidation of one organization. We are talking about dismantling the system of shadow control over entire states, which has accumulated colossal experience in management. So the question naturally arises: will the countries that have lived under his hand for years really be able to gain independence? |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
The Last of the Romans: How Russia Saved Its Greeks from the Criminal Yoke |
2025-01-31 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Ilya Knorring [REGNUM] On January 27, the Russian Defense Ministry officially confirmed that fighters from the Vostok military group had liberated the village of Velyka Novosyolka, 75 kilometers southwest of Donetsk, near the borders of the DPR with the Zaporizhzhya and Dnipropetrovsk regions. That same day, reports emerged of fighting on the outskirts of a nearby village with the unexpected (at first glance) name of Constantinople. ![]() The military significance of the capture of the seemingly "small" village of Velyka Novosyolka is obvious. Earlier, the Regnum news agency recalled : this "inhabitant" in 2023-24 was an important hub of the enemy's defense on the line from Ugledar to Gulyaipole, in the summer of 2023, including from Novosyolka, the Ukrainian Armed Forces tried to launch a "counteroffensive" to the Sea of Azov. The current impressive offensive of our troops in this part of the southern Donbas is part of the "breakdown" of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' defense at the junction of two Russian regions, the DPR and Zaporozhye. But the liberation of Velyka Novosyolka and its environs also has a historical dimension. ROMANS AND URUMS If you look at the dates of the founding of the villages of Konstantinopol, Nizhnie Yaly, Komar and Velikaya Novosyolka (which until 1946 had a different name - Bolshaya Yanisol), you can notice a coincidence: all these villages and settlements appeared in 1779. And the original population was also similar - these were Greeks who moved with the gracious consent of Catherine the Great from the Crimean Khanate, where Russian troops had entered shortly before. During the "times of Ochakov and the conquest of Crimea" on the Tauride Peninsula lived two groups of Greeks, who traced themselves back to the settlers of Byzantine times. Both peoples to this day call themselves almost the same: "Rumei" and "Urums". This means the same thing - Romans or, more precisely, Romai (this is what the inhabitants of the Eastern Roman Empire - Byzantium - called themselves). In Russian usage, the Rumei were called Greco-Hellenes, since they retained a dialect derived from medieval, Byzantine Greek. The second group, the Urums, were called Greco-Tatars. They had long since switched to the Crimean Tatar dialect. For example, the names of the villages of Maloyanisol and Bolshaya Yanisol come from the Urum (and Tatar) "yeni sala" - new village. The hypothesis that the Urums are baptized Tatars can be rejected unequivocally: the baptism of Muslims in the Ottoman Empire and the Crimean Khanate was impossible and punishable by death. The Greeks who accepted Islam dissolved into the Tatar population, leaving traces only in the gene pool of their descendants. "Where is our homeland? In Greece? In Asia Minor? No! Our homeland is the mountains of Crimea... There are our holy temples and mountain monasteries, cave cities and impregnable fortresses," writes Urum local historian, professor of Donetsk University Stefan Kaloyorov. CORRUPTION AND BUREAUCRACY Catherine's decree on the resettlement of Crimean Christians (Greeks, Armenians and Vlachs) to the empty lands of Novorossiya seemed to bring only good: the empire took the Orthodox peoples under its protection and saved them from persecution by the "Mohammedans". Crimea had already been conquered in 1778-79, but had not yet become ours. The Khan still sat on the throne in Bakhchisarai. But, on the other hand, the annexation of Crimea to the empire was a matter of time. Catherine's nobles and military leaders asked a reasonable question: was it necessary to organize the resettlement of Christians at all? General Alexander Prozorovsky, whose troops were stationed in Crimea, wrote to the Governor-General of Azov and Novorossiysk, Prince Grigory Potemkin : "When Crimea is taken into subjection... they (the Greeks and other Christians - editor's note) will be the first inhabitants here, so it seems there is no need to remove them from here." But the empress made a decision. And so - about half of the Taurian Urums and Rumei, 18 thousand out of about 40 thousand who lived in Crimea, took one hundred thousand heads of cattle, left their native mountains and moved to the steppes of Northern Taurida. The resettlement was supervised by the most serene Prince Potemkin, Alexander Suvorov (then lieutenant general) and the Greek metropolitan of Kafa - Theodosius Ignatius. "Anabasis" - "a march into the interior of the country" turned out to be difficult. Khan's customs officers were stationed at Perekop. The Tatars took 5 thousand rubles from the emigrants for passage - an astronomical sum. It is known that Khan Shahin-Girey "in respect for the withdrawal of Christians" (that is, for his consent) received 50 thousand rubles from the Russian resident in Bakhchisarai Andrei Konstantinov. After the Crimean corruption, a new test awaited the settlers within the Russian Empire: domestic bureaucracy. The Greeks were sent to register in the Alexander Fortress (future Alexandrovsk, now Zaporozhye), after which they were supposed to determine the places of settlement - but the red tape continued until the spring of 1779. During the winter of 1778–1779, the settlers “lived in difficult conditions, without any special provision for their needs, in conditions of rampant diseases… in dugouts or in open-air tents,” writes historian Kaloyorov. A letter from Metropolitan Ignatius to the Russian resident Konstantinov has been preserved: "I suffered great anxiety on the way, and especially the poor Christians... Not having a place to live... some, having caught a cold, died of the cold. My spiritual son! What you spoke about and gave hope for, there is nothing yet." The difficult circumstances of the resettlement give modern Ukrainian publicists and even historians a reason to declare this event a "deportation" and almost genocide. For example, the publication UArgument wrote: "The tragedy of the Greek settlers remained a tragedy in the memory of the descendants of those settlers. But some opportunists from politics turn it into a farce, trying to present one of the actions of the expansionist policy of tsarist Russia as such a concern." But Kiev propagandists, as usual, show only part of the picture, distorting it. FACTORIES AND GARDENS One of the three people responsible for the resettlement, Alexander Suvorov, sounded the alarm and managed to squeeze 130 thousand rubles out of the imperial treasury, which were necessary for the settlement. On May 21 (June 3), 1779, Catherine signed a decree in Russian and Greek, which defined the status and privileges of the settlers. The settlers were granted a 10-year exemption from all taxes. The decree also stated: “You are allowed to build merchant seagoing vessels from your own capital, to establish necessary and useful factories, plants and orchards, from the cultivation of which you can sell all kinds of grape wines… in barrels.” The Urums and Rumei settled in the area of Mariupol, the "Greek capital" of the Russian Azov region. No less than two dozen settlements appeared here. Familiar names were transferred from Crimea: thus, Urzuf and Yalta (one of whose quarters is called Massandra), Stary Krym and Mangush - the "namesake" of an ancient village near Bakhchisarai - appeared in the Azov region. The village of Anadol reminds us of our ancestors from Anatolia - Asia Minor. The settlers developed the former Wild Steppe north of the sea, along the banks of the Sukhie Yaly, Mokrye Yaly and Kalmius rivers. Thus were founded Bolshaya Yanisol - Velikaya Novosyolka, Constantinople, the settlements of Novaya Karakuba (today's Krasnaya Polyana) and Beshevo (now called Starobeshevo), as well as the village of Bugas, near which the city of Volnovakha arose. Viticulture, “granted” to the Greeks by decree of Catherine, actually began to develop only at the beginning of our 21st century, but even in the century before last, agriculture and cattle breeding flourished, and orchards flourished. SCYLLA, CHARYBDIS AND COMRADE YEZHOV The Urums and Rumei, along with their neighbors, the Great Russians, Little Russians, Bulgarians, Moldovans, and other peoples who made up the motley population of Novorossiya, survived revolutions, repressions, and the Great Patriotic War. In the 1920s and 1930s, there were Urum schools and a department at the pedagogical institute, but after the implementation of Directive No. 50 215 signed by the head of the NKVD Nikolai Yezhov, which ordered the “liquidation of large espionage, sabotage, and nationalist counterrevolutionary organizations of the Greeks,” they ceased to exist due to the arrests of teaching staff. However, the Azov Greeks managed to pass between Scylla and Charybdis - although in 1944 the Greek population was deported from Crimea, this new disaster did not affect the Donetsk region. On the contrary, in the post-war decades the people even multiplied. The approximate number of representatives of the Greek-Azov subethnos is 250 thousand people. This is the third largest people of Donbass and the Azov region (the bulk of it is concentrated in the DPR) along with Russians and those who were counted as Ukrainians in the censuses. Local Greeks are the largest compactly living community in the Hellenic diaspora in the post-Soviet space. True, in the 2001 census, many indicated themselves as Ukrainians - if the census takers filled out the questionnaires, or Russians, if the respondents filled them out themselves. The Ukrainian ethno-nationalist project clearly did not imply cultural diversity. In 2014, the Greeks, like other residents of the former Donetsk region, mostly chose the DPR and a return to Russia - but the militia here, as in Mariupol, alas, did not have time to gain a foothold. TYRANNY OF KLEPTOCRATS Then, in the spring of 2014, Velyka Novosyolka found itself under double oppression: firstly, the SBU was operating in the frontline zone (in 2017, the security forces reported the arrest of the organizers of the "separatist" rallies three years ago). And secondly, the "eastern yoke" was established in the person of the Salama family, which local residents, according to them, fear more than the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the SBU. As residents of Velyka Novosyolka say, the Salama family (the surname is of Arabic origin, although the Salamas themselves consider themselves Ukrainians) lived in the neighboring village of Krasnaya Polyana and owned a hardware store there. The most media-famous representative of the family, Petro Salama, got involved with the Right Sector* during the ATO and joined the Donbass* volunteer battalion, which, along with Azov*, gained notoriety for kidnapping and torturing prisoners, which was even recorded by the OSCE mission. In December 2017, Donbass militant Petro Salama, also known by the call sign Vodila, was one of the defendants in the case of the murder of a couple of businessmen in Velyka Novosyolka, Vladimir and Larisa Degtyarenko and their son Valeriy. Ukrainian media reports constantly emphasized that the Degtyarenkos are close relatives of "Viktor Yanukovych's godfather." Larisa Degtyarenko's father, Valeriy Shira, is indeed the godfather of the former president of Ukraine. He is also the former head of the Velikonovoselkovsky District Council and the unofficial owner of the district. By the way, we will add that Shira also has a criminal trail - suspicion of ordering the murder of a rich farmer and former deputy Ivan Kharaman. In general, the regime that reigned on the lands of the Azov Greeks could well be called by the ancient word "kleptocracy" - the rule of thieves. Returning to the probable killer Petro Salama, we note that he, having spent about two years with his accomplices in the Mariupol pretrial detention center, was transferred to house arrest in April 2020. Then a "blackout" appears in his biography, and it appears again in the winter of 2022 - then the Salama brothers organize a territorial defense battalion in Krasnaya Polyana. In May 2022, the village was liberated by units of the Russian Armed Forces, and local residents reportedly looted a household goods store belonging to the Salam family, taking the pillows, blankets, and cleaning products sold there to homes. Salam's brothers, who had chosen the Ukrainian side back in 2014, fled to Velyka Novosyolka, where the Ukrainian Armed Forces had established themselves, and took charge of the local territorial defense. In Krasnaya Polyana, as local residents say, a sister, Natalya, remained, who reported in detail to the brothers across the front line about the looting of property. Enraged, the brothers ordered a strike from Novosyolka on Krasnaya Polyana with Grad launchers - but, ironically, the strike primarily damaged their own family home. Needless to say, after this they became even more fierce, residents of Krasnaya Polyana note. So the liberation of Bolshaya Yanisol - Velyka Novosyolka became liberation from the yoke of criminal authorities associated with the bandit national battalions. But the rampage of "brothers" controlled by no one is, of course, not the only trouble brought by the Kiev tyranny. The forced evacuation carried out by the Kyiv authorities has hit the entire local population hard, and not only the Urumians. Now the Azov Greeks and their neighbors will once again face "anabasis" - this time returning home to Velikaya Novosyolka, Constantinople and other villages of "Russian Greece". There is one consolation: this road should be easier than that of their ancestors - the first settlers. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Japan has written a book about the genocide carried out by the Kyiv regime in Donbass |
2025-01-13 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] Japanese historian Takeyuki Tanaka has published a book entitled “Alley of Angels,” which tells about the genocide carried out by the Kiev regime against civilians in Donbass from 2014 to 2022. ![]() One of the motives for creating the book was the Japanese government's ignorance of the true reasons for the start of Russia's special operation in Ukraine, Tanaka noted. "Despite the fact that Russia... launched a special military operation to protect the lives and rights of the residents of Donbass, the Japanese government ignored the reason and considered Russia to be an immoral country that unilaterally invaded Ukraine, and Japanese television, newspapers, magazines and scientists all criticized Russia and expressed support and solidarity with the neo-Nazi government of Ukraine," RIA Novosti quotes Tanaka as saying. As the historian noted, the Japanese authorities, taking the US and European countries as an example, used propaganda to “brainwash” the Japanese, which is why anti-Russian sentiments have increased in the country. According to Tanaka, such actions by Tokyo will only lead to the destruction of relations with Moscow. At the same time, the historian wanted to convey to readers that the culprit of the conflict in Ukraine is the Kiev regime, created by the US as a result of a violent coup d'etat in 2014. “To this end, I collected as many photographs as possible and addressed the truth about the eight years during which the neo-Nazi regime, a puppet of the United States that glorifies Banderaism, continued to brutally murder fellow Ukrainians,” Tanaka noted. Currently, according to the agency, the book ranks second in the Japanese segment of Amazon. As reported by the Regnum news agency, in September 2024, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted in an interview with the Mongolian newspaper Onodor that the main participants in the 2014 coup in Ukraine were neo-Nazi groups, after which they began to determine the entire course of the country. After the coup, hatred of everything Russian became the official ideology of Ukraine, which led to the subsequent genocide of civilians in Donbass, the Russian leader explained. At the same time, Putin emphasized that the main reason for the tragic events in Ukraine is the targeted anti-Russian policy of the West, led by the United States, Putin emphasized. For decades, they have been seeking complete control over Ukraine, financing nationalist and anti-Russian organizations, systematically implanting the concept that Russia is allegedly the eternal enemy of Ukraine, the main threat to its existence. In essence, Ukraine has become a bargaining chip in the implementation of the West's geopolitical ambitions, the Russian president continued. Ukraine would have remained within its 1991 borders if the settlement agreement between the opposition and then-President Viktor Yanukovych had not been disrupted in February 2014, said Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Ukraine, at the hands of those who came to power through a coup, destroyed its own territorial integrity, he added. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Two Analyses: Three options. What opportunities does the liberation of Ugledar give the Russian army? |
2024-10-04 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Sergey Adamov [REFGNUM] Russian troops are completing the cleanup of Ugledar, a city southwest of Donetsk. Fighters from the Vostok group raised the Russian flag over the city administration building. ![]() The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine stopped mentioning Ugledar in reports on the situation on the fronts on October 1 - a clear sign that the city was taken under control by the Russian army. The next day, the command of the Ukrainian group of forces "Khortitsa" reported that "as a result of the enemy's actions, there was a threat of encirclement of the city: the high command granted permission to carry out a maneuver to withdraw units from Ugledar in order to preserve personnel and military equipment, and to take up a position for further actions." The liberation of Ugledar seriously changes the frontline situation and threatens major problems for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. At the same time, in the near future, Russian troops will have to strengthen their new positions, the assault on which lasted more than two years. Until recently, Ugledar remained the last “fortress city” on the front line Artemovsk – Toretsk – Avdeevka – Krasnogorovka – Maryinka, along which the Ukrainian Armed Forces planned to hold back the advance of Russian troops in Donbass. In this strategy, the troops in Ugledar were given an important role: to hold a large area of territory from Maryinka to Velikaya Novosyolka. Since the city is located on a hill in the middle of a large plain, control over it provides a strategic advantage on this section of the front. The five-story buildings in the center of the village were strategically important for the Ukrainian troops; they were turned into observation posts for adjusting artillery fire. Realizing the importance of the settlement, the Ukrainian Armed Forces command always supported the city garrison in repelling attacks by the Russian army, sending reinforcements and artillery. But as the “fortress cities” fell one after another, the situation on the Ugledar section of the front began to critically deteriorate for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. "I HAD TO GO OUT ON FOOT" The final stage of the operation to liberate the city began on September 27, when Russian troops outflanked Ugledar and took it in a semi-ring, cutting off the main supply routes. The enemy garrison in the city found itself in operational encirclement. By September 30, Russian troops occupied the western outskirts of the city. According to a source of the Regnum news agency, who was in the Ugledar direction, by this time the formations of the 72nd brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces began to leave the city. At the same time, the withdrawal was accompanied by large losses in the ranks of the Ukrainian troops. "They retreated at night through the fields, along country roads, in groups. Since they started retreating late, the roads were already under surveillance, so we did not allow them to move freely. Individual groups were unable to leave, this is already a task for the cleanup groups," the source said. The retreat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from Ugledar became an important topic for Ukrainian and Western media. A number of observers directly condemned the Ukrainian command for weakening a strategically important section of the front. In turn, servicemen of the 72nd Brigade told journalists that they had to leave on foot, since the command did not organize a planned evacuation. In the ensuing chaos, the retreating troops suffered heavy losses from artillery fire and drones. At the same time, the Associated Press suggested that the loss of Ugledar was a consequence of the US refusal to allow Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory. "This is just a small part of the predicament Ukraine finds itself in, which reflects the US refusal to grant Kiev permission to strike targets deep inside Russian territory without degrading Moscow's capabilities," the agency wrote. In addition, Russian aviation continues to dominate the air, and Russian industry is developing and promoting increasingly powerful glide bombs, to which Ukraine has no effective response. Deliveries of Western fighters to the Ukrainian Armed Forces have failed to change the situation on the front, AP summarizes. DIRECTION - NORTH After the liberation of Ugledar, several directions open up for Russian troops to continue their offensive. The first is to the north, in the direction of Kurakhovo. Earlier, the forces of the "Center" group, advancing from Maryinka and Krasnogorovka, were able to approach the Kurakhovo reservoir to a distance of less than one and a half kilometers. The offensive is developing from several directions at once, but to completely encircle Kurakhovo, it will be necessary to cut off the Zaporizhzhya highway. According to the latest data, Russian troops are building on their success in this direction and continue to push back enemy forces, demoralized by the loss of Ugledar. "The fighting is taking place in the Bogoyavlenka area, where the Ukrainian Armed Forces have retreated from Ugledar. It is several kilometers to the north. But, most likely, they will not fortify there, because the village is in plain sight, and will retreat further - to Uspenovka. No one expects the front to fall apart tomorrow, but our prospects are good," adds the source of IA Regnum. Another direction that opens up with the capture of Ugledar is to the east, in the direction of Velyka Novosyolka, a local road junction and the center of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ defense on the border between the DPR and the Zaporizhia region. There is also the option of an offensive in the northwest direction, towards the administrative border of the DPR, where in a 30-40 kilometer area there is no longer a single large settlement under the control of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. PAYBACK FOR THE KURSK ADVENTURE Ukrainian sources directly criticize the country's military and political leadership for weakening a large section of the front and report that troops in Ugledar have not received reinforcements or been withdrawn for rotation. This information is confirmed by the Western press. Forbes magazine analyzed the situation at the front and came to the conclusion that Kiev decided to use reserves not in Donbass, but in the Kursk region. It was there, according to the publication, that Leopard 2A6 and Strv 122 tanks (the Swedish version of the German tank), as well as the SCV-90 infantry fighting vehicle, were spotted. Presumably, it was the start of the operation in the Kursk region that led to the collapse of the Donetsk front of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and Kyiv does not have enough forces either to develop an offensive in a new direction or to organize a defense in the Donbass. More from regnum.ru A large deposit, former "fortification". Why is the capture of Ugledar so important? by Denis Davydov The capture of Ugledar is given such close attention that settlements measuring one and a half by one and a half kilometers usually do not deserve. The nearest villages - Pavlovka and Nikolskoye - are much larger in area, but the peculiarity of this city is that there was no private sector there. Without knowing it, Soviet builders initially built the village of Yuzhny (as it was previously called) as a powerful fortified area - panel high-rise buildings in an open field, to which were added the elegant above-ground structures of the Yuzhnodonbasskaya No. 3 mine. Its white "skyscrapers" against the backdrop of the steppe have always been considered a favorable shot from the point of view of industrial design: the parallelepiped above the main trunk is beautiful and perfect in combination with the rest of the building complex. In the 1960s, powerful seams of good-quality gas coal were explored here - with low ash and low sulfur content, suitable for coking and with a relatively shallow occurrence. The deposit, located away from the "old Donbass", was recognized as super-promising, and according to various sources, 7-8 mines were planned to be established here. At the same time, housing was built - arriving miners were immediately given apartments. The first coal was brought to the surface in 1973, and the following year a railway line was built to transport it to Donetsk, to which the urban-type settlement was administratively subordinate. Since 1969, it has already become Ugledar. But the eight mines did not work out - the next one was opened only in the mid-80s, and both "Yuzhnodonbasskiye" became the main support points for the formation of the "coal - coke - metal" chain, which became the basis of the prosperity of the "Donetsk clan". And they worked quite successfully until the coup d'etat of 2014, when the clever guys of Viktor Yanukovych intended to put up for sale through the State Property Fund most of the state mines that were part of the state enterprise "Donetsk Coal Energy Company". And to lock everything in their hands. The new government did not think in terms of “chains,” so by about 2017, the trusted persons of the new Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko confidently brought the Ugledar mines to bankruptcy. They pumped money out of them through underpriced coal and overpriced equipment for modernization. At the same time, after the purchase, everything just lay in warehouses. As a result, production stopped completely in 2019. The New Ukraine project did not envisage any industrial development in principle. The country, whose goal was to endlessly create problems for Russia, confidently took a course towards complete deindustrialization. Industrial zones were initially considered solely from the point of view of being cut into metal, and then as objects suitable for military purposes. Accordingly, Ugledar was turned into a “fortress” dominating the area, without any pity – there were no plans for it anyway and there could not be any. The Russian Armed Forces units began storming it two years ago, and of course, with little success. The fortress in the middle of the steppe gave huge advantages to the defenders, who had everything in plain sight. The situation began to change after the Ukrainian Armed Forces' defense was pushed through northeast of Ugledar, in the area of Novomykhaylovka and then Konstantinovka. Later, Vodyanoye fell, and Prechistovka fell to the west of Ugledar. As a result, the flanks crumbled and the city fell - the garrison began to be withdrawn, fearing encirclement. Moreover, as some military personnel believe, the order to leave was given too late, so as not to spoil Zelensky’s trip to the United States, which led to major losses: the garrison had to fight in an operational encirclement and leave across the same bare steppe. From a military point of view, this point on the map provides several important advantages. Now, the Russian Armed Forces control the very same railway line to Donetsk, once built to facilitate the development of the deposit. Through it, the advanced units receive fast communication with the entire south of Donbass; the highway is part of a single network with Mariupol, Crimea, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions. In addition, this local success helps to form a "cauldron" southwest of Donetsk. In order to avoid falling into it, Ukrainian troops will be forced to roll back to the west, to the border of the Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions. From here it is a stone's throw to Polog and Orekhovo; in these vast spaces there are no longer any large settlements that could be turned into “fortresses”. At one time, the Germans, having lost the battle for Donbass in September 1943, quickly retreated behind the Molochnaya and Dnieper rivers, burning everything along the retreat route. The Wehrmacht commanders understood that the troops were doomed in the open field. The leaders of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, who will now cling to the last chances to hold back the advance of the Russian army, also understand this. The last key center of Ukrainian defense on the way to Kurakhovo will most likely be the village of Bogoyavlenka, which will determine the further course of events. However, the army is followed by the managers. And from the point of view of the future of these territories, the restoration of Ugledar and the development of huge coal reserves, the restoration of industry will be a much more significant victory. Russia does not rule its lands as a temporary worker, whose task is to rush and run away. So there are people who look at the coal miners' town in the middle of the steppe not only as a "fortified area with commanding heights." Perhaps those hundred and fifty residents who survived the assault in their destroyed homes stayed precisely for this reason. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Military commissars are against Soros. Mobilization reaches the icon of the Ukrainian media |
2024-05-29 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Anatoly Savenko [REGNUM] There is such a historical character - Pastor Martin Niemoller. The same one for whom there was no one to stand up when the Gestapo came for him. Today's Ukraine is just such a place where someone comes for someone all the time. And then comes the “Niemoeller moment” - when they come for those who professionally closed their eyes to what was happening. If anyone has forgotten, the phrase with which the pastor went down in history sounds something like this: “When the Nazis captured the communists, I was silent: I was not a communist. When they imprisoned the Social Democrats, I was silent: I was not a Social Democrat. When they grabbed the union members, I was silent: I was not a union member. When they came for me, there was no one to stand up for me.” So here it is. There is such a publication in Ukraine - “Ukrainian Truth” (UP). One of the first online media in Ukraine. Old-timers remember that it was created by journalist Georgy Gongadze, whose mysterious murder was used to attempt to overthrow President Leonid Kuchma. Since then, the UP has become the banner of “progressive forces” and the mouthpiece of foreign agents - grant eaters, Soros, their name is legion. Brave anti-Kuchmists and denouncers of Viktor Yanukovych’s golden toilets. Since its creation, it has been in a special account (and funding) with the US Embassy in Ukraine. In a word, a lump! The pillar and affirmation of Ukrainian truth. This electronic newspaper became not only the main collective agitator, but also a collective organizer during the first Maidan in 2004 and one of the key ones during the second in 2014. And of course, since 2014 they have been at the forefront of information in the war with Russia, to which Russia finally showed up in 2022. And then the news spread that the chief editor of the economic editorial office of Ukrainskaya Pravda, Dmitry Denkov, was caught by the military commissars. And they didn’t just catch him, but kept him for a whole day without contact somewhere in the Belgorod-Dnestrovsky district of the Odessa region. Apparently they were preparing for a counter-offensive. Gloating in such a situation is, of course, not good. Especially if the author himself systematically uses various simple ways to avoid meeting with the man-catchers from the TCC. But it’s impossible not to note that Niemöller’s moment happened here. At least in the Ukrainian version. None of the “investigative journalists” in the UP asked any uncomfortable questions when, in the spring of 2015, it somehow became very popular among prominent representatives of the Party of Regions to take their own lives. None of this liberal-Euro-Maidan-grant-eating fraternity remembered freedom of religion when the state persecuted the UOC in 2019. None of them remembered freedom of speech and corporate solidarity when in 2021 Zelensky closed television channels and imposed sanctions on Media and journalists list. And of course, “Ukrainian Pravda” was silent (silent at best!) when the SBU grabbed all the unreliable people, everyone they managed to catch. There is still no news about many who were taken in the spring of 2022. And now UP journalists have decided to raise their voice: it turns out that mobilization in Ukraine is being carried out with violations! It turns out that the phones of those being mobilized are confiscated by force (so that relatives cannot quickly contact lawyers, bring the necessary documents, certificates, etc.) Because it is still possible to gnaw out a person from the TCC, but from the Armed Forces of Ukraine it is almost impossible. Only if all of Ukraine has known about this at least since the beginning of 2023 (and in the last six months, Telegram channels have been flooded with videos of “voluntary” mobilization), then the UP has only now opened the door to this Narnia. Obviously, the point is that for some reason UP journalists are out of favor with Zelensky’s entourage. Let's say, the male part of the propaganda telethon has nothing to fear. Just like the editorial offices of the state news agencies UNIAN, Ukrinform, the editorial office of BBC-Ukraine, the representative office of Deutsche Welle* and a number of other media (mainly TV channels). The rest of the Ukrainian journalists can either remain silent or hope for publicity (read: that the US Embassy will read the news and give the Bank a command not to escalate the situation and to release the editor-in-chief). This is how the UP turned out to have a “Niemoeller moment.” But not entirely: by the evening, the editor-in-chief finally got in touch and said that he had found a common language with the TCC and would soon join “... the unit that he wanted to join even before this incident.” Having clarified that “... this is the best option for me.” At the same time, the journalist confirmed the “voluntary-forced” nature of the mobilization. However, I have a version about why they suddenly decided to shave the editor-in-chief of Ukrainska Pravda into the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And the location of capture is key here. The Odessa region, or rather, the Odessa-Reni highway, is widely known in narrow circles as a convenient place to escape from Ukraine - on the transit section of this route (8 km of the route passes through the territory of Moldova). It is enough to leave the car right on the side of the road and walk a couple of kilometers to the nearest Moldovan village. Naturally, the Ukrainian authorities are taking special measures to ensure that the entire male population liable for military service does not flow into this “hole in the fence.” To move along the transit section, special reasons are needed. But, as always in such cases in Ukraine, there is an opportunity to “agree.” Prices for such services are growing all the time and currently amount to plus or minus 10 thousand dollars, depending on the negotiability of border guards. If you believe the statement of the press service of the Odessa Regional TCC, the journalist “... was detained by representatives of the State Border Service of Ukraine in the Odessa region. The reasons indicated by the citizen for moving through a transit section with regime restrictions were not supported by documents...” Simply put, the editor-in-chief of the capital’s media could have exactly two reasons for being where he was caught: an editorial assignment or an intention to flee Ukraine. But in those parts they don’t like either independent draft dodgers or independent investigators. Less than a week ago, on the opposite outskirts of Bessarabia, in the Danube town of Reni, eight employees of the DSR (Department of Strategic Investigations) of the National Police of Ukraine, who came to collect information about the organization of the passage of draft dodgers across the border, were beaten at once. Moreover, the beating happened with the full connivance of the local police. They only escorted their beaten colleagues to the department and did not even think about detaining the attackers. Well, it seems they decided to deal with the journalist more gently: they handed him over to the local TTS officers for the plan. And they, in turn, could offer him a simple choice. Or go somewhere near Chasov Yar as a gunner, or end up somewhere quiet (headquarters, press service) - but only if he forgets to even think about investigating the escape routes of draft dodgers to Moldova. And most importantly, the alleged involvement of the local police and military commissars in this. Of course, this is just a guess. But both sides indirectly confirm it. Whether the outcome of this story should be considered a happy ending is left to the readers' judgment. But I ask you to testify that when they came for the Soros from Ukrainska Pravda, the author did not remain silent! |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Ministry of Internal Affairs put commander of the Ukrainian Ground Forces Alexander Pavlyuk on a wanted list |
2024-05-05 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Anymore, war can be considered lawyer busy work. [Regnum] The Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs has put the commander of the Ukrainian Army Ground Forces, Alexander Pavlyuk, on the wanted list. The corresponding data appeared in the department’s database on May 4. “Pavlyuk Alexander Alekseevich. Date of birth: 08/20/1970. Wanted under an article of the Criminal Code,” the wanted card says. It is not specified under what specific article the search is being conducted. Pavlyuk became commander of the Ukrainian Ground Forces in February 2024, after his predecessor in this post, Alexander Syrsky, was appointed commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army. Prior to this, Pavlyuk was Deputy Minister of Defense. As IA Regnum previously reported, on May 4, the Ministry of Internal Affairs put the head of the Kiev regime, Vladimir Zelensky, on the wanted list. The ministry noted that he was wanted under an article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, but did not specify which one. On May 2, the Ministry of Internal Affairs put several Ukrainian politicians on the wanted list, including the former Minister of Justice of Ukraine Pavel Petrenko and the ex-head of the SBU Valentin Nalyvaichenko (listed by Rosfinmonitoring as terrorists and extremists). More from regnum.ru Ministry of Internal Affairs has put the former President of Ukraine Poroshenko on the wanted list The Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs has put the former President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko on the wanted lis. The corresponding data appeared in the department’s database on May 4. “Pyotr Alekseevich Poroshenko, 09/26/1965. Wanted under an article of the Criminal Code,” the wanted card says. The database also contains information about the defendant’s place of birth - the city of Bolgrad in the Odessa region. The article under which Poroshenko is wanted was not indicated. Poroshenko became president of Ukraine after the coup in Kiev in 2014 and the overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych as head of state. In 2015, he made an odious statement that in Kyiv children would go to schools and kindergartens, but in Donbass they would “sit in basements.” Poroshenko served as President of Ukraine until 2019, when he lost the election to Vladimir Zelensky. As IA Regnum previously reported, on May 4, the Ministry of Internal Affairs put the head of the Kiev regime, Vladimir Zelensky, on the wanted list. The ministry noted that he was wanted under an article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, but did not specify which one. In addition, on May 2, several Ukrainian politicians were put on the wanted list, including the former Minister of Justice of Ukraine Pavel Petrenko and the ex-head of the SBU Valentin Nalyvaichenko (listed by Rosfinmonitoring as terrorists and extremists). Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Alexander Litvinenko, ex-Minister of Finance of Ukraine Alexander Shlapak and ex-head of the Ukrainian National Bank Stepan Kubiv were put on the wanted list on May 3. Even more from regnum.ru The Ministry of Internal Affairs has put the former acting chief on the wanted list. O. Head of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Mikhail Koval. The Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs has put the former acting commander on the wanted list. O. Head of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Mikhail Koval. The relevant data was published in the department’s database on May 4. The wanted card states that Koval was born in the city of Izyaslav in the Khmelnitsky region on February 26, 1956. The ministry announced that it was looking for him under an article of the Criminal Code. There are no other details in the database. Koval headed the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine from March 25 to July 3, 2014. He also served as Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine and First Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council. In military service, Koval rose to the rank of colonel general. As Regnum reported, on May 4, the Ministry of Internal Affairs put the head of the Kiev regime, Vladimir Zelensky, on the wanted list. Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on International Affairs Grigory Karasin suggested that the department made this decision because the Ukrainian leader heads the junta responsible for crimes against Russians and Ukrainians in the Donbass and new Russian territories. In addition, on May 4, the ministry put the ex-President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko and the commander of the Ground Forces of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Alexander Pavlyuk on the wanted list. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
From triumph to rat corner. Five years of Vladimir Zelensky |
2024-04-02 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Denis Davydov [REGNUM] Vladimir Zelensky is celebrating two important anniversaries one after another. March 31 marked the fifth anniversary of his shocking victory in the presidential elections in Ukraine. And on May 21, presidential powers turn into a pumpkin and right now they are preparing a “defense line”, with the help of which Bankova hopes to continue to maintain Zelensky’s sole power. The irony of fate is that he is not the first head of state who was looked upon with great hope at the beginning, but in the end began to be viewed with contempt and hatred. And Zelensky himself, which is also traditional for Ukrainian politics, desperately clings to power, shouting about his need. Although in 2020 he proved to foreign journalists: “I don’t cling to ratings or power. If I cannot end the war, then another person needs to come who is capable of ending this tragic story between our countries.” The “anti-system” party and promises to build “a country of other opportunities, where everyone is equal before the law, where there are fair and transparent rules of the game” allowed them to win the elections on March 31, 2019 with an indicator of 73.22%. The war party then shrank to 25%, even without the voters of Donbass and Crimea, Ukrainian society clearly expressed its desire for peace, and Zelensky firmly promised it to everyone. The people, fed up with the aggressive shamanism named after Petro Poroshenko, were ready to vote for anyone - just to breathe out and start living normally. However, certain force majeure circumstances pulled the cheerful colloquial artist into their millstones, along with his motley “mono-majority” recruited literally on the street. The result was smooth red-black coarse Bandera flour. Instead of “smiling Ukrainians” we see a totalitarian society with a tormented Fuhrer at the very top. Now Zelensky stands “for war to a victorious end,” regardless of any losses, and executes anyone who dares to contradict him. On the occasion of an important anniversary, it is worth remembering what these circumstances were and how the KVE officer from Krivoy Rog turned from a harmless “clown” into a bloody dictator with a crumpled face. "THE PEOPLE'S PRESIDENT" “Dear people, throughout my life I have tried to do everything to make Ukrainians smile. I felt this in my heart, it was not only my job - it was my mission. For the next five years, I will do everything, Ukrainians, so that you don’t cry,” - with this phrase the political path of Vladimir Zelensky as president began. None of the Ukrainian political scientists (including the author of these lines) believed in his victory, with the exception of a little-known expert who, even after the release of the TV series “Servant of the People,” declared: this is a successful bookmark for future elections. Then no one heard him. However, already a few months before the 2019 elections, some serious people from Europe began to seek contacts with the actor’s headquarters. We wanted to agree in advance on serious contracts and cooperation parameters. It looked very strange, but in the end it turned out that serious people knew something. It’s just that a false scheme was initially built, thanks to which many believed that Zelensky’s electorate was only young people. In fact, sociology showed that throughout the campaign the candidate moved into older niches and, accordingly, his core was formed closer to the elections at the expense of the older generation: 35 plus, 45 plus, etc. The TV series plot really worked; Ukrainian voters voted for the sincere “teacher Goloborodko”, who was going to deal with the old elite, bloated from constant theft. The campaign was carried out competently, unlike other candidates, Volodya was almost invisible, he existed as a conventional figure and was unobtrusive. Each voter endowed it with its own content, superimposing the image from the series on a living person and convincing himself that “there is justice, it is worth fighting for.” “Back then it was a classic protest vote. At that time, society was wildly tired of the “gray-haired Hetman,” who trumpeted on daily television about the Army, Faith and Mova. Like, it is necessary to fight to the bitter end, talk only in language and go to a single “politically correct” church, which he himself created. So the reaction of the Ukrainian people is absolutely not surprising,” Ukrainian political scientist Kirill Molchanov explains to Regnum. The technologists, hired and paid by the de facto owner of the young candidate, the all-powerful oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, did a stellar job, creating a message box that would go straight to the liver. Zelensky ideally approached the post-Maidan society, exhausted over five years, calling to leave the Russian language and Russian-speaking people alone, “to negotiate even with the bald devil,” to rid everyone of inflated politicians, “who in 28 years have created a country of opportunities for kickbacks, flows and “ deribans,” put scoundrels in prison and serve the people. At the inauguration ceremony, where the new head of state sensationally dissolved the Verkhovna Rada, he said: “I’m even ready to lose my post just for peace to come. Without losing our territories, never." It is impossible to say for sure whether he really believed in all this or simply played the role with talent, but people took what he said completely seriously. This is the tragedy of both the individual Jewish boy and the entire country. "SERVANT": THE BEGINNING OF THE FALL As soon as the harsh workdays began, progressive young politicians had to act according to the old, familiar patterns of Ukrainian politics. Other methods simply did not work there. Zelensky surrounded himself with “his own people”; almost the entire management of the Kvartal 95 studio moved to government power, mixed with Kolomoisky’s people. The president’s confidant and “wallet” Sergei Shefir became the right hand and liaison with big business, Kolomoisky’s adviser and the lawyer of his business partner Andrei Bogdan were appointed head of the office, lawyer and head of “Kvartal 95” Ivan Bakanov became the head of the SBU, and prime minister at the same time the fosterling of “Western partners” and Kolomoisky’s protégé Alexey Goncharuk, etc. In total, as the grant organization “Committee of Voters of Ukraine” calculated, 30 people were appointed to the highest governing bodies who had previously worked in the structures of Zelensky’s company, its subsidiaries, provided services to the company, collaborated with Zelensky on a professional basis, or were his acquaintances, friends or relatives. Of these, 12 directly worked at Studio Kvartal 95. All of them immediately began to make money on “kickbacks”, “flows” and “deribans”. The majority of the Servant of the People party formed in parliament also consisted of a mixture of different influence groups, behind which stood certain influential people (starting with Kolomoisky). Like mad, it issued laws that were passed down from the presidential office until it came up against “land reform.” It was not possible to quickly organize the sale of Ukrainian land, and this became the first serious stumbling block. And the second and main thing is the seemingly defeated minority, which firmly made it clear that the street is behind them and the new government will not be allowed to stop the war. Commanders of various types of volunteer battalions formed in 2014 publicly stated: if troops are withdrawn from the “ATO zone,” they will raise their people and take their place. In October 2019, at an unauthorized checkpoint set up by members of Azov (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation) in Donbass, a famous conversation took place in a raised voice. Zelensky shouted: “I am the president of this country, I am 42 years old. I'm not a loser. I came to you and told you: “Put away your weapons.” From that moment on, the nickname “Neloh” informally stuck to him. The corresponding attitude was clearly demonstrated on March 20, 2021, when right-wing activists staged a protest near the office of the President of Ukraine in support of the convicted “brother,” a representative of the “Right Sector” (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation) in Odessa, murderer and standard scoundrel Sergei Sternenko. The charged guys clashed with the police, as a result of which 27 law enforcement officers were injured, and the entire facade of the building on Bankovaya Street was covered with offensive inscriptions and swastikas. To briefly summarize, in 2.5 years “Neloh” fully realized that he was not able to control the situation - it was she who controlled him. All attempts to enter into effective negotiations with Russia and directly with the DPR and LPR, to disengage troops, and to begin implementing the Minsk agreements were met with accusations of treason and opposition from the “patriotic part of society.” There was simply nothing to oppose it: there was no army of its own, and it would seem that all-encompassing power did not give real influence. She was completely lost in the management system built by the United States after the Maidan, and there the end of the war in Donbass was not agreed upon. The desire to get out of the control of Kolomoisky, to whom the United States had complaints, led to control by the Americans and personally over Zelensky. He was received in Washington, he was promised support and money, personal security, and agreements on financing the defense industry were signed with the participation of the new President Joe Biden. 2021 dotted all the i's: changing the role became a matter of not only political, but also physical survival for Zelensky. Therefore, what he was trying to fight against now had to be led. The Fuhrer began to hatch from the Neloha larva. THE WAR STARTED IN KYIV At the beginning of 2021, the issue of “annexation of Crimea” by Russia and the topic of returning the peninsula to Ukraine, as well as the rejection of a political settlement of the armed conflict in Donbass, finally became the center of foreign policy efforts of the Ukrainian leadership. In essence, Zelensky has turned into a copy of Poroshenko, completely taking over the rhetoric of his opponents. In mid-March, he signed the “Strategy for de-occupation and reintegration of the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol” developed by the National Security and Defense Council, which states that Kiev will use measures of a “diplomatic, military, economic, informational, humanitarian and other nature” to return this territory. At the same time, the process of searching for participants in the preparation, signing and ratification of the Kharkov agreements of 2010, as well as those responsible for the loss of Crimea in 2014, began. “International partners” were called to the cause of sacred struggle, and they tried to unite them at the summit of the “Crimean Platform” - a new international negotiating platform. In the new “Military Security Strategy of Ukraine”, signed by Zelensky and published on March 25, 2021, the Russian Federation is declared a military adversary from which the main threats come. Accordingly, “the integration of Ukraine into the Euro-Atlantic space and the acquisition of NATO membership” were named among the main goals of the military security strategy. High-ranking Americans often visited Kiev, Biden was constantly on the phone, and in early May, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the famous “cookies on the Maidan” Victoria Nuland, Deputy Secretary of State for Political Affairs, visited Ukraine. Following the summit meeting in September, a joint statement was adopted on the strategic partnership between the United States and Ukraine. The parties agreed to intensify the work of the commission, which should develop a new Charter for Strategic Partnership. During the visit, agreements worth 2.5 billion were signed between Ukroboronprom and US military-industrial companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris Global Communications, Global Ordnance, Day & Zimmermann Lone Star LLC. That is, the main suppliers of weapons already in 2022. At the same time, a “witch hunt” began within the country. First, all opposition television channels were subjected to aggressive pressure and then closure (the latter were destroyed already in 2022) and a number of other publications. Personal sanctions were introduced by decisions of the National Security and Defense Council against the political opposition, which called for peace and normalization of relations with the Russian Federation. Looking back, we can state that preparations for war were in full swing. On February 19, 2022, at the Munich Security Conference, Zelensky announced that he would initiate consultations within the framework of the Budapest Memorandum. If the summit of the participating countries does not take place or does not provide Ukraine with security guarantees, then the document will be declared invalid by the Ukrainian side along with the clauses that were signed in 1994. That is, an application was made to own nuclear weapons. The long-awaited, in fact, and approaching war with Russia with all our might, has already made it possible, through the hands of “teacher Goloborodko”, to fully implement the “Poroshenko program” - and in fact, Western Ukrainian nationalism. War “to the bitter end”, the ban on the canonical Orthodox Church, the seizure of churches and the transfer of holidays to the Catholic calendar. Total Ukrainization of not only the official sphere, but also the social sphere, with the complete destruction of the Russian language. A complete ban on any dissent, total purges, unlimited power of repressive bodies and “activists” looking for “enemies of the people.” Moreover, he implemented it with such zeal and enthusiasm that the “gray-haired hetman” is desperately jealous: it turns out that it was possible. END OF THE PERFORMANCE Over the past two years, the former cheerful boy, joker and mischief-maker has turned into a pure inquisitor, a twitched neurasthenic, lashing out at his subordinates and destroying anyone who allowed him to say a word against him. First of all, members of his team - as happened with people’s deputy Alexander Dubinsky, who is unlikely to leave the walls of the pre-trial detention center. Zelensky can no longer get out of this role; the destruction of his psyche has gone too far. So he views the expiration of his term of office as an unfortunate misunderstanding that makes no sense to discuss. He categorically denies elections, and colossal efforts were spent to knock out his main competitor, ex-commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny (whom the Ukrainians also in absentia endowed with fantastic virtues), from the game. At the same time, one of the main motivators for the former president is fear. After everything he has done, he will not have peace in any country in the world, and without power, just anyone will crush him. While he is on duty, he is alive and can do something. Therefore, the office on Bankovaya is undergoing vigorous activity to strengthen its position. Just the other day, first assistant Shefir, four out of 11 advisers, as well as two commissioners were fired. The reasons are not given, but it is significant that all seven full-time and 18 non-staff advisers to the head of the office Andrei Ermak, 14 advisers to his deputies and 8 office advisers remain in place. “This part of the process is the evacuation of Zelensky’s personal friends before a period of vague legitimacy. Now it’s better for them to stay away from Ukraine. These personnel rotations had to be completed before March 31, while Ze’s legitimacy was absolute. At the same time, no one left Ermak’s apparatus, except for Elena Kovalskaya, who went for a promotion, becoming, in fact, the head of Bankova’s apparatus, instead of Alexey Dneprov, who had been sitting in this place since the time of Turchinov. Only personnel personally tied to Ermak remain in the office. Preparations are underway for the period of “Yermakovism,” sayspolitical strategist Mikhail Pavliv to Regnum news agency. Ermak, reliable as a rock, is going to be prime minister in order to personally hold all executive power in his hands. After Zaluzhny’s resignation, there were large-scale changes in the security bloc, and the new commander in chief, Alexander Syrsky, is personally loyal to Zelensky. Just like the head of the SBU, Vasily Malyuk, who poured out loyal statements in a recent interview. The circle that the Zelensky-Ermak tandem still trusts has narrowed to a number of people who can be counted on the fingers of one hand. But this is a classic mistake that once cost Viktor Yanukovych power. He also thought that if his people were stationed everywhere, “everything was seized, everything was paid for.” But in fact, just as the “Western partners” were tired of the too cunning and greedy Poroshenko, who managed to please both Washington and Moscow, they were also tired of Zelensky, who had lost his sense of proportion. In principle, anyone can do his job: the “New Ukraine” project is formatted and effectively managed by the right-wing radical elite and its junta. So the “people”, who successfully changed the role of the Krivoy Rog captain at the beginning of his term, will just as easily finish the production with a new role. Vladimir Aleksandrovich is unlikely to receive his beloved applause at the end of his career. And he will meet his inevitable end in a remote corner, snarling like a rat. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
I wash my hands. Why Victoria Nuland decided to resign |
2024-03-06 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Evgenia Kondakova [REGNUM] In the coming weeks, one of the most influential and experienced American diplomats, whose role in shaping the anti-Russian course in the world is difficult to overestimate, will retire. We are talking about US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. In breaking the news, her boss, State Department chief Antony Blinken, in a statement, highlighted Nuland's contributions to confronting Russia in Ukraine, building a global coalition to ensure the "strategic defeat " of Moscow and "helping Ukraine approach the day when it can stand on its own two feet." - in democratic, economic and military relations." “It is Victoria’s leadership in Ukraine that students and diplomats will study for many years to come,” emphasized the head of the American foreign policy department. And there really is something to study: during a diplomatic career spanning more than 35 years, Nuland dealt with strategically important issues and had a direct impact on the entire system of international relations. It so happened that Nuland’s life from a young age was closely connected with the Soviet direction, and subsequently with the Russian and Ukrainian ones. In the early 1980s, she worked for a couple of months as a counselor at the Young Guard pioneer camp in Odessa, where she came as an exchange student, and later as a translator on a Soviet fishing boat, and during those 8 months she not only learned the Russian language, but also learned to drink vodka. Either this is just a coincidence, or the call of blood did its job: the diplomat’s grandfather came from the territory of modern Ukraine (Chernivtsi region), and his grandmother came from Belarus (Grodno region). Nuland also had a small Asian chapter in her political career: 3 years after graduating from the Faculty of Public Policy at Brown University, in 1988, she went to Mongolia, but there she also dealt with issues of relations with the USSR. And then the USSR disappeared. In the turning point of 1991, she was awaiting assignment to the American Embassy in Moscow, where Victoria was to establish ties with the government of the first President of the Russian Federation, Boris Yeltsin. Probably, the connections were established so successfully that just two years later Nuland was expected to be promoted. She was transferred to the central office of the State Department. As Deputy US Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, she oversaw the Russian direction, nuclear disarmament of Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Then, from 1997–1999, she served as deputy director for former USSR affairs at the State Department. With the advent of the new century, Nuland’s activities were not so closely connected with Russia: from 2003 to 2005, she was the US permanent representative to NATO, and in 2011 she became the press secretary of the State Department. But still, the most striking episode of her career is connected with Ukraine. In 2013, when she was appointed Deputy Secretary of State for Political Affairs, protests began in Kyiv. Activists demanding the resignation of President Viktor Yanukovych were not only supported by employees of the American embassy, Nuland regularly flew in from Washington, walked along the Maidan and handed out either cookies or pies there, which turned into a meme. At the same time, the diplomat would later argue in an interview with CNN that the United States “definitely did not spend money to support the Maidan, it was a spontaneous movement,” although she admitted that since 1991, to support “the aspirations of the Ukrainian people, who want to have a strong, democratic government, which represents his interests,” sent about $5 billion. True, the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, in an interview with CNN on February 1, 2015, openly stated that it was the United States that “mediated the transition of power in Ukraine.” No matter how Nuland tried to disavow the involvement of the American authorities in inciting the coup in Ukraine, she was directly involved in the formation of the post-Maidan leadership of this post-Soviet republic, for which there is concrete evidence. At the beginning of 2014, a recording of a conversation appeared on the Internet, which apparently took place after the 3rd round of negotiations between President Yanukovych and the opposition (January 24), in which Nuland discusses with the US Ambassador to Ukraine Jeffrey Pyatt who should join the new government : she lobbied for the candidacy of Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who later became prime minister, and proposed to “leave Vitali Klitschko and Oleg Tyagnibok outside.” It was Nuland who was entrusted in 2016 to conduct a dialogue on the Ukrainian issue with Vladislav Surkov, who was then an assistant to the President of Russia, but the past 4 rounds of negotiations did not produce results. With Donald Trump coming to power in the United States, there was, of course, no place for Nuland in his Republican administration. Nevertheless, she continued to work on Ukrainian topics “on a voluntary basis.” And the political resurrection was not long in coming - Democrat Joe Biden, who assumed the presidency in January 2021, offered her the post of Deputy Secretary of State for Political Affairs. A little more than a year later, on February 24, 2022, Russia launched a special military operation, and the United States had to become more active in the Ukrainian direction. Nuland’s experience was clearly indispensable here. Why did Victoria decide to leave now, when Kyiv found itself in a very difficult situation, when it needed the support of the West and Washington more than ever? “They won’t tell you the reason. But it is simple: the failure of the anti-Russian course of the Biden administration. Russophobia, proposed by Victoria Nuland as the main foreign policy concept of the United States, is dragging the Democrats to the bottom like a stone. What is there, it doesn’t let me tear myself away from him,” explained Russian Foreign Ministry official representative Maria Zakharova in her Telegram channel. Indeed, Ukraine, no matter how trivial it may sound, has become a suitcase without a handle for the White House: they cannot say “sorry, we’ll move on on our own.” Moreover, Biden and many members of his team with their own hands turned Ukraine into anti-Russia. The United States can no longer support it “as long as it takes,” since Congress has not agreed on further funding for Kyiv for several months, and the share of those in society who believe that too much money is being spent on Ukraine is already growing. And all this on the eve of the presidential elections, in which the Democrats’ position is, to put it mildly, shaky. That’s why the United States is gradually reducing its presence in Ukraine, shifting the entire burden of responsibility onto European countries, and Nuland decided to wash her hands of it and leave Biden to clean up what they did together in their time. Zakharova: Nuland decided to resign due to the failure of the anti-Russian course Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] US Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland has decided to resign due to the failure of the anti-Russian course of the Joe Biden administration, official representative of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Maria Zakharova said on March 5 in the Telegram channel. “They won’t tell you the reason. But it is simple - the failure of the anti-Russian course of the Baidan administration,” the diplomat noted. Zakharova noted that Russophobia, proposed by Nuland as the main foreign policy concept of the United States, is dragging the Democrats to the bottom like a stone. The Russian diplomat also posted a photo of the US Deputy Secretary of State praying and lighting candles in an Orthodox church. In this regard, Zakharova wrote that if Nuland suddenly wants to go to a monastery to atone for her sins, they will “put in a good word” for her. As Regnum reported, earlier, on March 5, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced that Deputy Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland would leave her post in the coming weeks. He added that the diplomat herself notified him about this. Blinken did not give a specific date for her departure from post. Nuland was the main American curator of Ukraine's anti-Russian course. Western media noted that Nuland’s appointment to the post of US Deputy Secretary of State could mean that Biden had chosen a course towards worsening relations with Russia. She also worked on policy issues regarding post-Soviet states under former US President Barack Obama and was Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
The main lesson of the Kyiv Maidan: a coup never brings improvement |
2024-02-23 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Vladimir Kornilov [RIA] So ten years have passed. Ten years after the victory of the coup d'etat in Ukraine, nicknamed there "Euromaidan" and even the "revolution of dignity." Everything that Ukrainians are experiencing now is a direct consequence of this coup, carried out under the auspices of the United States and its European satellites. Like all classic coups, Maidan began with beautiful slogans and completely empty promises, not backed up by anything. It started with the promise of “tea, coffee and good mood” and ended in bloodshed. Let us remember how the leaders of the “revolution” shouted from the rostrum: “So that every person in this country saves his life! So that our country is preserved as a single power! So that our children do not cry for their fathers! So that our fathers do not cry for their children!” Now all Western media articles about the situation in Ukraine are accompanied by photographs of countless graves in military cemeteries. In fact, an entire generation of young people in this country has been lost. When The Times correspondent, who recently traveled through Ukraine to communicate with the youth there, decided to ask two 18-year-old teenagers about their plans for the future, they answered briefly: “There is no future. <…> With this corrupt government. <…>.” But remember, the fight against corruption was the main theme of the Maidan ten years ago! On all the leaflets distributed there, this point was number one. First, Petro Poroshenko knocked off the “corrupt” Viktor Yanukovych, then Vladimir Zelensky knocked off the “corrupt” Petro Poroshenko. Now even senior employees of Zelensky’s office admit in private conversations with Western correspondents : “People steal as if tomorrow does not exist.” This is it - achieving a revolution! A lot was said on Maidan about the heavenly life that Ukrainians would live in immediately after the victory of the “revolution of dignity.” The lion's share of the agitation came down to "calculations of benefits" from the upcoming association with the European Union. The organizers of the coup included a sharp decline in prices for the population, a significant increase in Ukrainian exports and an increase in industrial production as “guaranteed consequences”. Here it will be useful to remember that before the Maidan, this country’s exports reached $70 billion, and at the end of last year it earned exactly half as much. Former Prime Minister of Ukraine Mykola Azarov, summing up the results of this decade, recalled that the country once produced 54 million tons of steel per year, and now - six million. And no matter what sector of the economy you take, the indicators will be similar. It’s all the more fun to hear Zelensky’s tales about plans to establish his own production of anything. The promises of Maidan ten years ago were particularly primitivistic. For example, one of the DJs at the rallies, TV presenter Natalya Sokolenko, joyfully promised from the podium: “Ukrainian men will live much longer. Women will also live longer. But men - much longer!” Now the main task for Ukrainian men is to hide, to escape from the military registration and enlistment offices, that is, to survive! And another Maidan DJ, Sergei Leshchenko, who was standing next to Sokolenko on the podium at that moment, is now calling on Europe to deport the Ukrainian men who managed to escape back in order to use them as cannon fodder at the front. So much for “visa-free”! In such cases, it is customary in Ukraine to ask: “Did the Maidan really stand for this?” But in fact, this is what Maidan stood for! This, of course, was not understood by many naive people who joyfully jumped in the cold with wild cries of “Whoever doesn’t jump is a Muscovite!” But these are the inevitable laws of any coups, riots, putschs and revolutions! Lenin once wrote that the driving force of any successful revolution must be “the lower classes who do not want to live in the old way.” But honestly, we must admit: a prerequisite for any successful revolution must be the deception of these “lower classes”, the promise of an unrealizable heavenly life. However, immediately after the coup, the opposite inevitably occurs: blood, dirt, darkness, devastation, a sharp deterioration in life, victims. Thus, Ukraine, having chosen the path outlined by it in the US State Department, was simply doomed to further degradation. It is clear that in Ukraine it is now customary to blame Russia for everything : if it weren’t for the “occupation,” we would now live like in Europe! This is usually said by those who, at best, “did not notice” how Ukrainian Nazis burned oppositionists in Odessa and bombed the cities of Donbass, and at worst, ardently supported these actions. For a long time, Russia tried to resolve the issue peacefully, admonished various Kyiv regimes, and called on the West to implement the Minsk agreements. But the West did not stage a coup in Kiev so that peace and prosperity would come. The original goal was to weaken Russia. Let it be at the cost of the lives and future of the Ukrainians themselves. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, summing up the decade of Maidan, said : “There is no doubt that the West has declared war against us. They do not hide it. <…> In war, the main thing is strategy, and it is not in Kiev, but far". And this strategy comes down to sacrificing Ukraine. So, having gone to the Maidan for a “good mood” and “lace panties,” the people of Kiev buried their country. Because the main result of the Maidan was a complete renunciation of sovereignty. Now it is not in Kyiv that decides how many more Ukrainians must die in order to realize the unrealizable dream of the West: “to defeat Russia on the battlefield.” What will remain of Ukraine and whether anything will remain, the true organizers of the Kyiv putsch, who still run the State Department, do not care at all! From their point of view, the end justifies the means. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Only Russia will help Maidan: exactly 10 years of 'dictatorial laws' |
2024-01-19 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Denis Davydov [REGNUM] “Dictatorial laws” appeared only in the third month of the “revolution of dignity.” Yanukovych’s authorities were thinking about ways to calm down the people on the Maidan, since they had clearly lost all sense of proportion, and in those distant times they were afraid and did not want to kill them, relying on the force of law out of old habit. And then on January 16, 2014, a terrible thing happened in the Verkhovna Rada. Having broken the resistance of the opposition when voting for the budget, Deputy Speaker of Parliament Igor Kaletnik took another package of laws “from the table.” The opposition knew its contents, so they began to take away the voting cards of the deputies. Kaletnik decided to vote with his hands. 235 deputies seemed to vote “yes,” and the next day, January 17, President Viktor Yanukovych signed a package of changes to the current legislation, which stirred up the progressive public. The new rules were assessed as a terrible attack on freedom and democracy, as they “intended to criminalize the opposition and civil society.” In addition, the way the law was passed in itself looked blatantly “un-European.” The current government, of course, was accused of copying draconian rules from Russian ones. From now on, it was forbidden to travel in convoys of more than five cars without the consent of the police (since the “AutoMaidan”, hung with flags, was circling through cities and towns). Punishments have been introduced for media outlets operating without registration, and the status of a foreign agent has been introduced for public organizations working with money from foreign funds. The protesters were threatened with long sentences for rioting, the installation of tents and the use of masks and helmets were prohibited, and holding rallies and demonstrations in violation of the rules was to be punishable by arrest for up to 10 days. Contempt of court was not ignored, since the “brothers” regularly organized pogroms there, repelling their detained like-minded people. For threatening a policeman - seven years. For collecting information about law enforcement officers and judges - up to three years. The state announced its right to restrict access to Internet resources that violate the law “based on expert opinion.” This was absolutely outrageous and unheard of! Deny Internet access! Or this: the law introduced new articles on extremist activities and slander (which are also distributed via the Internet) and introduced punishment for this. Either a huge fine or jail for up to three years. By the way, materials with calls for a violent change of the constitutional system and obstruction of the activities of government bodies and officials were considered extremist. In addition, there were ideological laws on liability for the desecration of monuments, denial or justification of the crimes of fascism. As is known, he was not in Ukraine, just like Bandera’s followers. Maidan thought and came to the conclusion that this was an attack specifically on the “Ukrainian division “Galicia”, which, by pure chance, was formed as part of the SS troops. In general, the progressive public unanimously called such legislation “manipulative and repressive”; “legally, historically and politically illiterate”; it allows for “arbitrary interpretation of almost all of its main provisions”; the definition of “supporters of fascism” can actually also include Western Ukrainian freedom fighters (many exclamation points). Then the future mayor of Kiev, Vitaliy Klitschko, immediately called for an all-Ukrainian strike. The leader of the far-right Svoboda party, Oleg Tyagnibok, called the events in parliament a “coup d’etat.” Former socialist and son of a communist Yuriy Lutsenko expressed the strong opinion that “the adopted laws are a maximum security prison for everyone who feels like a free person,” and that now has come “the time when the words of the anthem “Let us lay down our soul and body” have come to be tested in practice for our freedom,” and that this is “the moment of truth.” It is necessary to create a Popular Front, a resistance movement that unites millions. Yulia Tymoshenko squeaked something from prison, influential journalists condemned, the main media union adopted a statement regarding censorship and the attack on basic human rights. The mayor of Lvov, Andrei Sadovoy, said that in his city the decisions of the central legislative body will not be implemented. From the Maidan stage they called for violence, because everyone standing there had a grille shining on them, and that was not what they wanted. In general, the authorities got scared, and on January 28 everything was canceled. Ukraine failed to turn “into an analogue of the Russian Federation,” a terrible place from which it was necessary to flee to the holy, prayed-for European Union. But ten years have passed. And somehow, completely unnoticed by the entire progressive public and the heroes of the Maidan, Ukraine turned into a much more terrible place. Access to the Internet is prohibited there without any examination - an entire segment is simply blocked, and people are not told to go there; appearing on prohibited social networks can backfire. No one is surprised anymore by arrests and imprisonments for extremist statements, since they are imprisoned even for talking with relatives, as recently happened to a local deputy in Cherkassy. And in Lvov, one guy was imprisoned for selling a Soviet flag on the Internet. Becoming an agent and being accused of treason is a matter of a couple of minutes. Failure to comply with the demands of law enforcement officers is no longer punishable by a fine; they simply grab you and take you away. Some forever. And going to court in search of the truth makes everyone laugh: look, what a fool. But people are calmly tried in absentia, something that Yanukovych’s “gangster power” could not cope with. The same thing with “violation of regulations and the constitution”: it has long been possible to pass any law at all and violate all basic human rights. It would be strange if it was the other way around. The collection of personal information does not scare anyone; on the contrary, publishing the data of “enemies of the people” is considered a good deed, as is persecuting them or even punishing them without trial. Censorship has become universal; having your own opinion is prohibited in this country, which is monitored by a huge team of voluntary morality police. We won’t even say whether there is at least some political opposition or public organizations left that act against the interests of the regime. Any protests are prohibited, “you can’t rock the boat.” But you can’t shake it, because there’s a war with Russia. And it began then, in 2014, it was announced unilaterally precisely so that Yanukovych would cry in his Rostov with envy. Why do you spit on laws, trample on the constitution, steal and lie? Yes, because there is war. And whoever is dissatisfied is an agent of the Kremlin. And for a post criticizing the authorities, you are handcuffed. We fought with Russia not to become like Russia, but we became worse than Russia because of Russia. On the occasion of the anniversary, I even conducted a small experiment, copied and sent to the author a post ten years ago, where he explained that “ people came out against a corrupt, usurped, unjust system, where everyone does not feel safe, because no one believes in the objectivity of law enforcement officers, justice courts and the fact that his taxes are not stolen, but go to roads, schools, hospitals.” He promised to go to the Maidan again if the same or worse ones come to replace the authorities. Because we need to build a state “in which you want to live.” I don’t want to disappoint you with a banal answer, but that’s exactly what he can’t handle on the Maidan: now there are more important threats. You can't rock the boat, it makes the rats sick. Thus, ultimately, the only way to help the Maidan achieve its goals is to implement Russian legislation and management methods. As years and practice have shown, it is more progressive, flexible, and the system of power, in general, is aimed at creating. The “analogue of Russia” in 2014 would have been much more European and democratic. So the problem of the “revolution of dignity” is for the first time considered precisely from the perspective of competition between two legal systems - Russian before 2014 and modern Russian. Despite years of European integration efforts, it is Russia that remains the center around which the Ukrainian universe revolves. After years of experimentation, we can state with satisfaction: Russia ultimately won against itself. In principle, it is impossible to come up with anything better for Ukraine. Thus, the transformation into an “analogue of Russia” of the 2014 model, that the transition to Russian laws in their current state for the unfortunate Ukraine, mired in the inability to “stop stealing and start building,” becomes a natural blessing. And the sooner this happens, the better for everyone. It turns out that this is exactly what Maidan stood for. |
Link |