Home Front Economy | ||
Mexican truck stampede to hit U.S.! | ||
2007-04-12 | ||
And the GOP wonders why it lost last November Despite congressional opposition, the Bush administration is fully committed to beginning within weeks a pilot test that will allow Mexican trucks to operate freely across the U.S. A spokesman for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Ian Grossman, told WND the agency plans to grant the first authority for a Mexican trucking company to operate its long-haul rigs throughout the U.S. as early as the end of this month. WND previously reported an amendment introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., into the Fiscal Year 2007 Supplemental Appropriations Bill is designed to block the Department of Transportation's pilot test until the Mexican government authorizes U.S. trucking companies to operate in Mexico.
The Mexican trucking company can begin operating trucks in the U.S. immediately, once the FMCSA grants the authority, Grossman told WND. Grossman explained granting authority to the 100 Mexican trucking companies specified under the DOT pilot test may take between four to six months to complete. "The department is committed to moving forward with this program," he said, "and will continue to work with members of Congress to address their concerns." Reaction from the Teamsters Union was immediate and sharp. "The Department of Transportation can't enforce truck safety in the United States, let alone at the southern border," spokeswoman Leslie Miller told WND. "The Bush administration continues to show a reckless disregard for the will of Congress and the American people who oppose this illegal pilot project." Rod Nofzinger, spokesman for the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, was equally critical. "Unfortunately, the administration is bound and determined to move forward with their Mexican trucking program despite the serious concerns that have been raised by the American public, Mexico-domiciled trucking companies and lawmakers on Capital Hill, both Republicans and Democrats alike," Nofzinger told WND. "I have little doubt that they want to beat Congress to the finish line on this," Nofzinger continued. "They know that once the toothpaste is out of the tube, it's awfully hard to get it back in. Once Mexican trucks start rolling throughout the U.S., it will be very difficult for Congress and the American people to turn them back, regardless of the safety and security risks that they'll be carrying with them."
Responding to the congressional concerns, Grossman said Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta had certified in 2002 that DOT met each of the 22 safety requirements Congress in the Fiscal Year 2002 DOT Appropriations Bill demanded be met before allowing trucks from Mexico to drive beyond U.S. commercial zones along the border. Kasper disagreed, insisting Mineta's certification was not enough. "We need public disclosure of the safety requirements and public debate, including a DOT filing in the Federal Register before we approve this test," Kasper told WND. "While the NAFTA Trucking Safety Act restates the safety conditions included in the FY2002 appropriations measure," Kasper continued, "the legislation goes further by requiring the implementation of English proficiency standards and data base accessibility for law enforcement officials to verify a driver's identification and criminal history." Hunter's NAFTA Trucking Safety Act has been referred to several House committees, including House Transportation and Infrastructure; Homeland Security; Judiciary; and Ways and Means. According to Kasper, the NAFTA Trucking Safety Act has collected 18 co-sponsors. Asked to comment on the Feinstein amendment or Hunter's NAFTA Trucking Safety Act, Grossman told WND the FMCSA "was engaging in no speculation on the course of possible congressional legislation" regarding the Mexican truck pilot test. Looks like at least a few libs are starting to get it as well. They have to choose between the union vote and the illegal alien/razista solidarity vote. Hmmm, decisions, decisions. Not the first time I'm glad I'm not a lib. "What's good fer bidness is good fer 'Merka." We have to get away from this idea that "free-market fundamentalism" is synonymous with "conservative" and that profits for business supercede every other consideration. Mexican trucks turn our highways into slaughterhouses and drive our owner-opeators into bankruptcy? Hey, good for business. Cheap illegal labor destroys our working class and feeds crime. Hey, good for business. Yahoo rats out dissidents to the Red Chinese? Hey, good for business. Dubya and Condi soft-soap the Saudi Arabian terror cult? Hey, good for business. If this keeps up we won't have a country. Is that good for business? | ||
Link |
Europe |
EU pressures members to renege on U.S. air service deals |
2005-03-16 |
Days ahead of talks in Washington, the European Union head office pressured its members Wednesday to renege on their air service agreements with the United States and let the Commission negotiate on behalf of all 25 states. The European Commission said it sent legal warnings to 11 members that have independent "open skies" accords with Washington. That brought the nations against which the EU head office has started proceedings to 20 overall, including all the major markets. EU Transport Commissioner Jacques Barrot will hold talks with U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta starting Monday to try to open the U.S. domestic market more for European carriers and foster more competition. Renege on agreements. What next, treaties? |
Link |
Home Front |
Terror strikes on US |
2001-09-11 |
CNN September 11, 2001 Posted: 5:14 p.m. EDT In an apparently coordinated terrorist attack against the United States, four commercial passenger jets crashed on Tuesday, three of them into significant landmarks. |
Link |