Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Europe
Sex, Lies and a Terrorist Trial
2005-12-27
Three women dressed in what was close to a burqa were giggling and chatting as prosecutor Koos Plooy addressed the court. “What a nasty man,” I heard one of the women say. The women were among the public present at the Hofstadgroup Trial in Amsterdam where fourteen Muslim extremists from the Netherlands are currently on trial (most of them are Dutch Moroccans).

The women arrived at the court house to show their solidarity with Hofstadgroup member Mohammed Fahmi Boughaba and another woman named Soumaya Sahla. Soumaya, just 17 years old, was not on trial this time (she had been convicted in a previous court case); she was now on the witness stand and therefore under oath. She was one of the girlfriends of 23-year old Nouredine el Fatmi (“Fouad”), a small and bearded fanatic occasionally displaying a sarcastic smile and born in Midar, Morocco. He is one of the most prominent members of the Hofstadgroup on trial in Amsterdam.
If he was born in Morocco, I'd say that makes him a Moroccan Moroccan, not a Dutch Moroccan...
Nouredine and Soumaya were arrested in the metro station of Amsterdam-Lelylaan on June 22, 2005. Nouredine was carrying a machine gun – an Achram 2000 – in his bag. His weapon was fully loaded and ready for use. El Fatmi, who does not have a residence permit in the Netherlands, liked to seduce young Dutch Moroccan women and then force them into an “Islamic marriage.”
I think that means he gets to bang 'em and then move on when he's tired of them...
Soumaya was already legally married to a Dutch Moroccan man in The Hague, but that did not deter El Fatmi who seeks new recruits all the time for his extremist “Takfiri” version of Islam. His previous girlfriend was 16-year old Malika Shabi. Called to testify in court, Malika did not dare to speak after she had received death threats from somebody inside or close to the Hofstadgroup. She was so terrified that she avoided looking at him.
If you let that suff go on, there's not even a semblence of justice. But that's the sort of thing brownshirts, do, right?
Somewhere in April or May 2005, El Fatmi met Lahbib Bachar and Hanan Sarok, a young and happy Dutch Moroccan couple living in The Hague – they were not fanatics but moderate Muslims. Initially, El Fatmi was friendly, later he evolved into a real intruder, demanding that they no longer watch “Satanic” television programs and listen to the radio. He even forced them to sell their furniture to a relative.
'Nother words, they let him be in charge of their lives because he was an arrogant prick and they were too scared of him to tell him to piss off...
There was no doubt that El Fatmi was interested in seducing the pretty and slim Hanan, but her loyalty to her husband proved stronger than anything else. El Fatmi then started to intimidate the happy young couple. He and Soumaya took Lahbib and Hanan to a forest in Amsterdam, opened his bag and suddenly produced his Achram 2000 machine gun. He aimed at a tree, pulled the trigger and fired twice. He then gave the automatic weapon to Soumaya who also pulled the trigger. El Fatmi turned to Lahbib and told him to do the same. Lahbib noticed that Fatmi was serious about it. He took the machine gun, and, aiming at another tree, he fired, too. He then gave the weapon back to El Fatmi who asked Hanan to try the weapon. She was terrified and refused. So far, she had never touched a weapon of any kind. But El Fatmi and Lahbib insisted. “I was afraid that he would shoot me dead, if I didn’t do it,” Hanan later testified in court, sobbing repeatedly. Lahbib also felt completely intimidated.
"Lookit me! I'm a tough guy!"
Both Hanan and Lahbib were quite relieved when their dangerous young Moroccan friend Nouredine expressed the wish to go to Brussels to find an apartment for himself. Having no residence permit himself he forced Hanan and Lahbib to sign the contract and rent the apartment for him. Hoping El Fatmi would stay in Brussels and leave them alone, they obliged. But he did not stay there all the time. He forced them to accompany him on his trips to Holland and back to Brussels, during which he was often accompanied by Soumaya.
Who paid for all those trips? Who bought the machine gun?
In court, El Fatmi challenged Hanan asking: “Why are you afraid of me?”
Because you're an intimidating asshole?
Sobbing again, Hanan said: “Because of your extremist ideology.” She then told the court: “On one occasion, he really threatened me in Belgium. I was in the hallway of the apartment in Brussels when he pointed a gun at me.” As Hanan was saying this, the judge noticed that El Fatmi was smiling.
Ah, sweet memories...
“Why are you smiling?” the judge asked.
“She is a liar,” he said.
“But why did you smile?” the judge asked once more.
“I have the right to remain silent,’” El Fatmi said.
Why do you think he was smiling, judge?
Lahbib Bachar told the court in Amsterdam he had also been threatened by El Fatmi. He was told once: “If you refuse to do what I want, your hands will be tied and you’ll have a bullet in your head.” Lahbib had seen at least three weapons in the Brussels apartment: a machine gun and a silencer, a baby uzi and a pistol as well as boxes filled with ammunition. “I have the right to remain silent,” El Fatmi’s girlfriend Soumaya Sahla said when prosecutor Plooy questioned her about the shooting exercises in the Amsterdam forest.
"Yez got nuttin' on me, coppers! Nuttin'!"
But in private telephone conversations with relatives, she used to be much more talkative. In June 2005, the Dutch Security and Intelligence Service (AIVD) tapped a telephone conversation between Soumaya and her brother. “I am walking with a 9 mm Achram 2000 machine gun,” she said. “Believe me, everything will be reversed now,” she told her brother.
"I mean, Fatty's got him some manhood now!"
Both in her own court case and later in the Hofstadgroup Trial as a witness (and consequently under oath), she claimed that when she talked to her brother about weapons, she was just making fun. She had seen the weapon on a website when she looked over El Fatmi’s shoulder in an Internet cafe in Amsterdam. She further claimed she never saw El Fatmi carrying a gun or weapon.
"No, no! Certainly not!"
Nobody in the courtroom accused her of committing perjury. And in interrogations with the police she said: “He is not the kind of man to carry a gun.”
Then her lips fell off...
In Holland, this kind of lying on the stand is not exceptional. Lying, moreover, is an integral part of the extremists’ ideology and jihadist strategy.
It's a way of life...
As a Muslim, you are not obliged to tell the truth once an infidel is challenging you. Courts in Western countries are seen as Taghut, or unholy institutions. The extremists abide by their own laws only – the so-called sharia law which is applied by special sharia courts. In some Western countries there are shadow sharia courts and sharia judges (they usually are extremist Muslim clerics). In Britain, for example, there is “The Sharia Court of the UK,” and I happen to know one of its “judges.” Yet, there is some inconsistancy in the behavior of these extremists. They always seem to find the best lawyers for themselves.
Lawyers need to be paid. Who's paying?
After the arrest of other leading members of the Hofstadgroup, El Fatmi began to see himself as the new “emir” -- or the leader. He had already written a martyr’s testament in 2003. And he met another condition for becoming a martyr: he married Soumaya only two months ago (Suicide terrorists usually marry shortly before they carry out their hideous plans). In court, El Fatmi repeatedly invoked his right to remain silent. By arresting him, plans for a terrorist attack in the Netherlands were frustrated. Apart from finding a machine gun in his bag, the police discovered that he was carrying two additional items in the same bag: a photo of Osama bin Laden and a so-called mediaplayer with a disk full of speeches of bin Laden and horror films on beheadings by men crying “Allahu Akhbar!”
Link


Terror Networks & Islam
No one else demolished so many Taghuts in such a short time!
2005-07-29
From Jihad Unspun, an article titled "Islam and Revolution," written by "The Street Mimbar." This is the third of a three-part series. The first two parts were summarized here.
.... And every time the revolutionary determination went into a higher gear, the anti-Islamic forces stepped up their dual stick and carrot approach. One of the carrots some Islamists are nibbling on today is a formula for sharing power. This is not new! What is new is the departure from the Prophet’s policy. ....

Some present day Muslims would celebrate for such an opportunity. Their argument would go as follows: Islam is intrinsically superior to the other ideologies and systems. The people are in dire need of Islam and they know it not. Some people are even Muslims and the only thing lacking in their lives is the implementation of the Islamic penal code and law. If we are given the opportunity to present people with the excellent qualities of Islam, then we should do so, because once they have tasted Islam, they will not settle for anything less.

This abridged argument contains at least a couple of fallacies. First of all, it accepts the good faith of Taghut, and it assumes that Taghut is going to honour its word. So there is an element of reliance upon Taghut to establish Islam. The other false assumption is that Islam is capable of winning over adherents who will en masse make a difference simply by granting Islam a stage appearance. ....

Muhammad’s lifelong struggle to destroy Taghut in the sphere of reality has to be resuscitated. Absolutely no-one in the history of mankind demolished in so short a period of time as many Taghuts as did this unique revolutionary. When we review twenty-three years of liberation and revolution led by Muhammed, we cannot but submit to the fact that this revolutionary was inspired by revelation. Virtually alone, and unsupported by any secular power, he managed to cause a radical change in the spiritual, social, economic, military, political and cultural activities of man. He was a revolutionary against the contorted concepts ....

Today there are heated debates in certain Islamic circles pertaining to the Islamic legality of revolutionary change in the regimes and dictatorships that have come into existence in Muslim lands. Menacingly, these establishmentarian-sponsored Islamists don’t favour a rupture with the Taghuti system. But, as a matter of Prophetic revolutionary discipline, we do not have a choice but to take issue with the established Taghuts, especially those that are mattressed by the affluence of petro-riches while their brothers and sisters in Islam and humanity are subjected to a general condition of oppression and injustice throughout Asia, Africa and the World at large. ....

And, there are other hadiths from the Prophet (alaih salaam), that demand and suggest rebellion against the established Taghuts travelling in our Muslim lands. Today, there is no excuse, nor alibi for the Muslims to ignore or neglect this effort that belongs to the Muslim Ummah, and the mustadafin (oppressed peoples) of Allah’s creation. Striving to achieve an Islamic Revolution is an embodiment of the revolutionary impulse of Muhammed (alaih salaam).

It has become obvious, even to non-Muslims, that the super and regional powers, (the US, the SU, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the Zionist occupiers of Palestine, Egypt, and virtually all the Taghuts in the world,) are involved directly more than indirectly against the revolutionary stance of certain Muslims, but let not the sons of the Islamic Movement take the side of the kuffaar as some moderates would like us to see.

Throughout this khutbah, I tried to demonstrate the affinity between Islam and revolution. It should be clear by now, that the two are synonymous and inseparable. Whoever the implementers of the Prophets revolutionary concepts are, be they the Ulema, the combatants, and the oppressed and committed sons of the Islamic Revolution, they are on the side of Allah’s Messengers .... if the leaders of Islamic associations, parties, organisations and local movements want to take the side of this historic procession, then the only step they have to take is the revolutionary march into the future as is outlined in the Qur’an, implemented by the Prophet and preserved by the Mujahideen.
Link


Terror Networks & Islam
The Revolutionary Language of the Qur'an Is Unmistakable
2005-07-24
From Jihad Unspun, an aritcle titled "Islam and Revolution" written by "The Street Mimbar"
Whoever rejects Taghut, i.e. A totalitarian government that is intoxicated with the excessive concentration of excessive power and believes in Allah is on firm grounds ... It was this determination to abolish the material manifestation of Taghut in its political, economic, military, cultural, social, psychological etc. forms that highlights the discourses and instructions of the Qur’an and Sunnah. .... This uncompromising, revolutionary and daring spirit motivated and oriented all the prophets. It was this divine revolutionary drive that forced them into execution chambers, exile, political refuge, poverty, excommunication, banishment, alienation, prison, ridicule, assassination attempts, a crucifixion bid, etc.

There can be no doubt that among the first political decisions taken by the Prophet was to organise his followers into what is today called a party. This massing of members was never a political leverage which the Prophet used to gain power, popularity or privilege. The rejection of the establishment was an all-out, hardcore and confident one, which did not break down into negotiations or accommodations half way through the struggle. On the contrary, the more the leadership of Muhammed’s revolutionary purity persisted in its opposition and relentless struggle to seize the power and legitimacy from the forces of shirk and Taghut, the more these kaafir leaders tried to persuade the Islamic leadership to negotiate, compromise and accommodate. Their desire is that you should accommodate and compromise so they would accommodate and compromise ....

The war initiated by the Prophet was a revolt against the value system and its legal system simultaneously. The revolutionary spirit did not spare the royalty and the majesty of Quraish. This revolutionary commitment denigrated Quraish’s futuristic vision, it vilified their lords and repudiated their cheap life. The revolutionary language of the Qur’an is unmistakable. ....

Then the revolutionary spirit in the Qur’an goes on to fiercely assail usury which was the oppressive money generating mechanism of the Quraishi power structure .... The revolutionary justice in the following ayaat threatens those mercantile elements ..... The consequence of these divine revolutionary guidelines was an increase in the persecution of Muslims. The revolutionary students and companions of Muhammad were tortured, but they did not leave their torture chambers convinced that the only way to power is by joining the Quraishi power structure and changing it from within. .... Instead, they graduated from their torture chambers with a fervent revolutionary conviction that Allah will deliver them either to worldly power or heavenly peace ....

Quraish instigated policies of boycotts and embargoes, it activated its mouth-pieces and media against the revolutionary impulse of the emissary and his deen but Muhammed (sallalahu alaihi wa sallam) continued to criticise them and he continued his struggle to undermine the prevailing Meccan order. ....

[The article continues on another page.]
..... And finally, the Qur’an’s revolutionary force conquers death itself. A Muslim does not fear dying. This is not to imply that a Muslim is obsessed with killing and being killed. Rather, a Muslim welcomes death when it becomes an act of worship and devotion. The quiescent attitude of government-sponsored Islam dreads death.

It can only be a revolutionary mood in the dear book that erodes all elements and factors of fear. Thus the stage is set for the military assault against the forces of shirk and kufr. Only after being equipped with this revolutionary fervour can Muslims be ready for the military campaigns awaiting them.

Those who compromise their revolutionary and military momentum during combat are warned and threatened. This is their ultimatum

O you who are committed to Allah, when you meet the kaafirs in battle positions, never turn your backs to them. If any of you turns your back on this enemy, and it is not as part of a strategy of war or a retreat to join another battalion of your own, then you draw on yourself the wrath of Allah and your abode is hell an evil refuge indeed (Surah Al-Anfal verse 15-16)

These ayahs and many more in the Qur’an are enough to shatter the static, dormant. inactive, dull figure image that today’s moderates want to make Muhammed (sallalahu alaihi wa sallam). This revolutionary example for all Muslims participated in 27 military battles and expeditions. .... The serious and assertive Prophetic mentality ordered the execution of 400 counter-revolutionaries belonging to Bani Quraida. Revolutionary integrity in the beloved heart of our leader made it possible for him to personally eliminate a kaafir by the name of Ubaiy Bin Khalaf. The Prophet’s policy to his commanders on the conquest of Mecca was that they should not kill anyone unless the others were intent on killing the Muslims. But there were several who the Prophet wanted to execute even if they were found within the sanctuary of the Kaa’ba. Among them were Abdulla bin Saad, Abdulla bin Khattal and two of his women singers who often sang songs of rhythmic diatribe against the Prophet. The Prophet ordered them killed in addition to others. His words still ring in the justice seeking and struggling revolutionaries .....

All of the above policies and actions taken by the beloved are subject to the outcry of international organisations, human rights associations etc. Even the conventional minds of ritualistic Islam would question the revolutionary portrait of the Prophet ..... And that is precisely the issue. The revolutionary figure of the Prophet has faded away. His revolutionary and combatant nature does not exist in the minds and hearts of the bulk of those who purport to follow him. Here lies the task of rehabilitating the revolutionary character of our supreme guide and teacher.
Link


Arabia
A Message From One Of The Mujahideen On Saudi Arabia’s New Most Wanted List
2005-07-02
By Fahd Ibn Farraj Al-Joair Al-Farraj
Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the Worlds. And no aggression except on those who transgress all bounds. Peace and prayer be on the most honored of mankind, his family, and his companions.

At the time I saw my people running into the apostate rulers pledging their support and loyalty, I felt it was my duty to renew my dissociation from those apostates and show my enmity and hatred towards them as Allah, the Most High, has made clear to us that one’s state of Islam is not complete unless he dissociate himself from the enemies of Allah.

When man meditates on the words of his Lord and the practice of the messenger (PBUH), he would have no doubt that the servant of Allah does not become Muslim without satisfying these two conditions: Rejecting Taghut and believing in Allah alone. Believing in Allah must also be based on helping and defending people of Iman (faith), and rejecting and showing enmity and hatred towards the unbelievers and all misguided people.

But anyone who runs into the apostates to renew his loyalty to them, is one from whom and his action we dissociate for his action is characteristic of Hypocrites.

This is Allah’s verdict on anyone who takes for friends Unbelievers rather than Believers. He is one of them and will have the same fate.

Honor can only be sought from Allah by faithfully worshiping Him and Him alone and by joining the community of the believing servants of Allah.

My dissociation from those who renewed their loyalty to the Tyrants, stems from Allah’s words.

Therefore, my dissociation from the Tyrants and all of apostates obligated me to seek friendship and protection with those in whose behalf Allah says:
{Your (real) friends are (no less than) Allah, his messenger, and the Believers,-those who establish regular prayers and pat Zakat and they bow down humbly (in worship). As to those who turn (for friendship) to Allah, His messenger, and the Believers,-it is the party of Allah that must certainly triumph.} 5:55-56
O Muslim brothers! This aya (verse) clearly shows that your friendship and loyalty should not be with The Jews or the Christians or the apostates but it must be with Allah, His messenger, and the Believers. Therefore, he who chose Allah and His messenger as friends will prosper in this life and in the hereafter.

O my people’s youth! Allah...Allah- I rouse you and invite you to come to the aid of your religion and to protect your Aqeedah, and support and join the Mujahideen, especially in the Arabian Peninsula for you Aqeedah compels you to do so.

O Muslim brothers! Beware of Satan and do not let him through fear into your hearts. Your life is in the Hands of Allah. What ever happened to you was not going to miss you and whatever missed you was not going to hit you.

O Muslim brothers! It is your duty to extend a helping hand to the Mujahideen and support them with your goods, persons, hands, and tongues.

Our dissociation from the current rulers is based on the following:
• Backing up the unbelievers as clearly seen by their stance towards the cross worshippers.

• Backing up the pagans as seen by their protection of the “Rafidhah” (the Shiah) in Madinah.

• Governing by man-made laws instead of the Shariah of Allah.

• Their war against Islam and people of Islam. There you see how they changed school curricula, manipulated media, and made mockery of your religion. Elevating sectarian advocates and wicked individuals to influential positions is the best evidence against them.

•Fighting Mujahideen, amongst them, are your sons and relatives. They have spilled so much blood,- such as, Hamoud Al-Jouair, Sultan Ibn Saad Al-Abeed, Ibrahim Ibn Abdul Aziz Al-Shayea, Abdul Rahman Ibn Dakheel Al-Faleh, may Allah accepts them as martyrs. Do we let the blood of those be spilled unanswered? Their only crime (in the eyes of the apostate rulers) was that they wanted to worship Allah alone.

• Prisons and jails are now full of righteous scholars and Mujahideen.
You must get up and stand as one man to defend this religion (Islam) and you must not get distracted by minor issues. Your religion is being dishonored, your wealth is being embezzled, and your blood is being spilled. What is left that is worth keeping? I swear by Allah that the inside (under the surface) of the earth is better for you than the surface.

As to the deployment of security forces into your towns, they only came to fight Islam and true Muslims as well as chasing Mujahideen. So wake up and shake off the dust that is covering you because you will not be excused before Allah on the Day of Judgment. Waste no time to dissociate yourself from those apostates and be first to help and protect your religion.

Allah knows best. Peace and prayer be on our prophet, Muhammad, his family, and his companions.

Fahd Ibn Farraj Al-Joair Al-Farraj
One of Saudi Arabia’s Most Wanted Mujahideen
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-4 More