Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Home Front: Politix
North Carolina launches in-person early voting with mountain areas still recovering from Helene
2024-10-17
[FoxNews] NC election officials says 76 polling locations in the 25 counties affected by Hurricane Helene will be open for early voting

Early in-person voting kicks off Thursday in North Carolina, one of seven hotly contested battleground states in the 2024 presidential election.

Some North Carolina communities are making last-minute adjustments to their 2024 election schedules in the fallout from Hurricane Helene this month.

In Buncombe County, one of the counties hit hardest by the storm, the board of elections approved new times and locations for early voting. Early in-person voting kicks off Thursday morning, with polls remaining open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. through Nov. 1.

"We’ve got a new early voting plan," Buncombe Board of Elections Chair Jake Quinn said in a statement. "Please everybody, spread the word."

Buncombe is also having to adjust polling locations, as some are no longer fit to serve as polling places or are more difficult to access. The county published a list of locations that are now operating for early voting.

Buncombe County voted decisively for President Biden in the 2020 election, according to state records. Biden received 96,515 votes, compared to former President Trump's 62,412, totaling a 60%-40% split.

Nearby Watauga County also released its own revised early voting schedule this month. The county's board of elections says none of its polling places has changed, but they will now expand their timing to be open on weekends during early voting. Residents will be able to access polling places from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday-Saturday and 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on Sunday.

"We are grateful to all the people that worked so hard to build our county’s infrastructure back so quickly. It is truly amazing to see people from all over the country pitching in to help strangers in need. That’s what America is all about. This helped minimize any disruptions to voters so that every voice can be heard. We also want to thank all the election officials who offered to work the new weekend shifts. We literally can’t do it without them," the board said in a statement.

Biden also took Watauga County in the 2020 election, receiving 53% of the vote to Trump's 44%.

State election officials are scheduled to hold a press conference Thursday on other measures they are taking to ensure the election goes smoothly.

They say roughly 25 counties were heavily impacted by Helene, and those contain 80 polling locations. Officials say 76 of those locations will be operational for early voting. Karen Brinson Bell, executive director of the NC State Board of Elections and Corinne Duncan, the Buncombe County elections director will lead the press conference.

The majority of North Carolina voters in the 25 counties impacted by Helene are Republican, according to state voter registration records. Officials say 482,930 registered Republicans live in the area, compared to 294,106 Democrats. There are also 492,546 unaffiliated voters.

North Carolina is one of the most competitive states this cycle
North Carolina last voted for a Democrat president in 2008, when then-Sen. Barack Obama won the state by 0.3 points, or 14,177 votes.

Trump pulled out a convincing 3.7 point win in 2016, but that margin shrank to 1.3 points against Biden in 2020.

Late last month, the Fox News Poll had the two 2024 presidential candidates just a point apart from each other, with Democrat nominee Vice President Harris at 49% and GOP nominee former President Trump at 50%. North Carolina is ranked a Toss Up on the Fox News Power Rankings.

The state has become more competitive as its population has grown. Over the last full decade, North Carolina added roughly 1.1 million people, the fourth-largest gain among all states.

Much of that growth has been in urban and suburban areas like those in solidly blue Mecklenburg and Wake counties.

The pandemic brought more wealthy, urban Americans from surrounding states, and there are pockets of college voters as well.

Rural areas have experienced some population decline, but they remain a powerful part of the state’s overall vote, and they vote overwhelmingly Republican.

HOW TO VOTE IN NORTH CAROLINA
This is a guide to registration and early voting. For comprehensive and up-to-date information on voter eligibility, processes and deadlines, please go to Vote.gov and the election website for North Carolina.
Related:
North Carolina: 2024-10-16 Good Morning
North Carolina: 2024-10-16 Biden's Deputies Spend $750 Million to Settle Migrants in North Carolina
North Carolina: 2024-10-15 Family that lost 11 in Hurricane Helene mudslides says community sacrificed 'life and limb' to save each other
Link


Home Front: Politix
North Carolina removes 747,000 from voter rolls
2024-09-28
[FoxNews] Among the most common reasons for removal was a change of address without notification or moving out of the state entirely

North Carolina has removed over 700,000 individuals from its registered voter list, officials say. The State Board of Elections announced Thursday that 747,000 people have been removed from voter rolls in the last 20 months due to ineligibility.

"The county boards follow careful policies to ensure that only ineligible records are removed, not those of eligible voters," the Board of Elections said in a press release.

"Meanwhile, newly eligible voters are constantly being added to the registration rolls in our growing state," the board added. "Currently, North Carolina has nearly 7.7 million registered voters."

A common reason for removal from voter rolls was moving residences — either within the state without notifying election officials or to another state altogether. Other removed individuals failed to vote in the last two federal elections and did not respond to follow-up notifications from the government seeking to confirm their registration. Death, felony conviction, requests to be removed, and lack of U.S. citizenship were also listed as reasons for dropping individuals from voter rolls.
It’s a start. Next look at imaginary residences and multiple registrations of the same individuals.
The Marist Poll released Thursday finds that Harris and Trump are tied at 49% among likely voters in North Carolina who were asked which candidate they were leaning toward. Of those polled who have made up their minds, 91% said they strongly support their choice.

North Carolina last voted for a Democratic president in 2008, when then-Sen. Barack Obama won the state by 0.3 points, or 14,177 votes.

Trump pulled out a convincing 3.7 point win in 2016, but that margin shrank to 1.3 points against President Biden in 2020.

North Carolina began absentee voting for registered voters on Tuesday, having begun sending absentee ballots to military and overseas voters on Friday. Applicants do not need to provide an excuse to receive a ballot.

The state must receive a ballot application by Oct. 29, and that ballot must be delivered to county officials by Nov. 5.
Related:
North Carolina: 2024-09-26 Scientists Discover New Species of Invasive Worms in the US
North Carolina: 2024-09-26 Fact check: Walz makes false claims about Vance, Trump and Project 2025
North Carolina: 2024-09-25 Ryan Wesley Routh faces new charge of attempted assassination of Trump after initial gun rap; son arrested for possessing child pr0n
Related:
Voter rolls 09/23/2024 Voter Fraud Vigilantes
Voter rolls 09/21/2024 Turkish 'special interest' migrant tells Texas troopers he paid $12K to cross into US illegally
Voter rolls 09/20/2024 Biden DOJ Hassles Tennessee for Verifying Citizenship to Vote, OK removed 450,000 names from voter rolls, fed judge in SC rules voter rolls are public records subject to public inspection

Link


-Short Attention Span Theater-
Soetoro Photo That Never Saw The Light of Day
2018-01-26
[TPM] A journalist announced last week that he will publish a photograph of then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama (D) and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan that he took in 2005 at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting, but did not make public because he believed it would have "made a difference" to Obama’s political future.

The photographer, Askia Muhammad, told the Trice Edney News Wire that he "gave the picture up at the time and basically swore secrecy."

"But after the nomination was secured and all the way up until the inauguration; then for eight years after he was President, it was kept under cover," Muhammad said.

Asked whether he thought the photo’s release would have affected Obama’s presidential campaign, Muhammad said, "I insist. It absolutely would have made a difference."
Link


Home Front: Politix
Joe the Plumber: Be Patient, 'Lot of Things to Unscrew' from Obamacare
2017-03-06
[PJ] NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. ‐ Joe Wurzelbacher, best known as "Joe the Plumber" after questioning then-Sen. Barack Obama on camera during a 2008 campaign stop, said he will view President Trump’s presidency as a win if he follows through on his promises in three main areas.
"Since 2008, I’ve really focused on state’s rights and Second Amendment issues, and so I go on Fox and go on a lot of different places, but I talk mostly about those things because that’s really where the power is supposed to be ‐ with the states. The federal government has essentially three jobs and I think President Trump is going to be able to do that ‐ one, create a good environment for business, two, secure American borders and three, make our military strong," Wurzelbacher told PJM during an interview at the Conservative Political Action Conference last weekend.

"As long as he does those three things, I’ll see it as a win. All those social issues and everything else gets pushed back to the state level because there’s no reason a centralized federal government should be passing laws for the rest of the land; that’s where the states comes in," he added.
Wurzelbacher said he is most concerned about the effect of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules and regulations on small businesses.
Link


Home Front: Politix
EMAILS: Clinton Allies ‘Believe The Obama Forces' Committed Voter Fraud In '08
2016-10-17
[Daily Caller] Two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign "flooded" the caucuses with "ineligible voters," according to leaked emails.

Emails hacked from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta cites two attorneys and "old friends of the Clintons," James Lyons and Michael Driver, tasked with "caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $" for the 2016 Colorado caucus.

Apparently, Lyons and Driver didn’t want a repeat of 2008 when, they believe, the Obama campaign "flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters," according to the email chain released by WikiLeaks. It’s unclear if they are only talking about the Colorado caucus or those in other states.

"High importance," Podesta wrote to campaign staffers in a May 2015 email.
Link


Home Front: Politix
LA Times Wants Rumored ‘Apprentice' Tape, Won't Release Obama-Khalidi Video
2016-10-14
[TammyBruce] As reported by Breitbart and other Conservative news outlets, the LA Times is in possession of a 2003 video of Obama at the farewell party of radical Palestinian, Jew-hating Rashid Khalidi, and reportedly features vicious anti-Israel rhetoric. The LA Times, however, will not release the video.

But they sure are eager to get their paws hands on a rumored video of Donald Trump that might embarrass him.

Via Breitbart. The Los Angeles Times is in a state of high dudgeon over rumored video tapes from The Apprentice that might embarrass Republican nominee Donald Trump, but which cannot be released.

Since 2008, the Times has refused to release the video of then-State Sen. Barack Obama attending a retirement party for radical Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi in 2003, which featured anti-Israel rhetoric. Now, however, the Times is devoting considerable attention to Trump videos that may not exist.

Yet no amount of persuasion or pressure -- not appeals to journalistic ethics, not the promise of a $100,000 reward -- could move the Times, for more than eight years, to release a video that revealed Obama's deep ties to anti-Israel activism, and that could have revealed whether he shared the anti-Israel hostility of those whose friendship and favor he cultivated in Chicago.
The L.A. Times Suppresses Obama’s Khalidi Bash Tape
Link


Government
A plague of senators
2013-09-22
[NYPOST] ... If the sight of senators in their own chamber was enough to drive Chaplain Hale to the Almighty, what would he make of a White House where senators run the show? From the presidency (ex- Sen. Barack Obama) and the vice presidency (ex- Sen. Joe Biden) to the offices of secretary of state (ex-Sen. John Kerry) and secretary of defense (ex-Sen. Chuck Hagel), this administration is dominated by escapees from the upper house of Congress.

You have to go back to the 1850s and the unhappy administration of Franklin Pierce for the last time America saw a like array of senators in these same jobs. It provokes an impertinent question: Might the surfeit of senators help explain why the president's foreign policy is in flames all across the world?

By the nature of the job, a senator shines most when he opposes a president, where his real constitutional powers -- obstruction and delay -- are best deployed. These negative powers are a strength of our system. But the Senate's innate emphasis on the deliberative and the collaborative also shields senators from the real-world consequences of their votes.

In other words, there's a reason the caricature of a senator is an old windbag.
Link


-Election 2012
Letting Joe just be ... Joe
2012-10-20
Champ's Joe, not Rantburg's Joe, though our Joe is both more entertaining and better spoken...
Down-home and laid-back, Joe Biden has been traveling the country saying what few politicians could about their opponents, for better or worse. Mitt Romney is "etch-a-sketchy," the vice president said this week.

Last month, he told a Hispanic audience: "Romney wants you to show your papers, but he won't show us his."
Funny, Joe. Did you boss ever show his papers?
Biden has a long history of edgy verbal blurts -- in 2007, he described then-Sen. Barack Obama as "articulate" and "clean," a comment he later said he regretted. But in the week since his blustery debate with GOP vice-presidential nominee Ryan, Biden seems to have found a slightly different niche -- a more deliberate delivery of his sometimes-outrageous utterances. He offers these with a smile, relishing the stage, often punctuated by a "Whoa!"
After 30 years in D.C., he should be well trained in theatrics.
Campaign officials have decided to let Joe be Joe. "He has an ability to connect and communicate in a clear and effective way," Obama campaign manager Jim Messina said in recent interview. "He, like the president, embodies an American success story."
Yes, middle-class guy goes to law school, enters politics and rises to high office. What's more American than that?
Republicans say Biden has repeatedly crossed the line of decorum, and political analysts wonder whether he's gone so far as to become unpresidential.

"Today's over-the-top rhetoric by Vice President Biden is disappointing, but not all that surprising," Ryan spokesman Brendan Buck said after Biden's "bullets" remark this week. "In the absence of a vision or plan to move the country forward, the vice president is left only with ugly political attacks beneath the dignity of the office he occupies."

William A. Galston, an aide to President Bill Clinton who is now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said he's "never seen a less presidential demeanor from a national candidate." Biden has twice run for president and has not ruled out a third attempt in 2016.
When O could be his Veep.
Polls show both sides of the coin. More than three in four Democrats view Biden favorably, but among all registered voters, the vice president is much less popular than he was as a running mate in 2008. In a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey early this month, Biden was viewed favorably by 39 percent of voters and unfavorably by 51 percent. In fall 2008, more than half of voters had favorable views of him.
That'd be those who voted for the Lightbringer and his Archangel.
"Joe Biden is Joe Biden, and he was elected to the Senate before the age of 30 and has been absolutely the same from the beginning of his political career to the end, if this election is the end," Galston said.
Link


-Election 2012
An open letter to Obama voters
2012-10-20
Matt Barber praises Americans willing to correct their mistake of 2008.

Did you vote for Barack Obama in 2008? A lot of people did -- obviously.

What a time. There's still room for improvement, but what a testimony to just how far we as a nation have come in terms of racial harmony, tolerance and diversity.

Only decades earlier a man like Barack Obama -- a black man -- couldn't even drink from the same water fountain as a white man, let alone become president of the United States. A hundred years prior to that, and he may well have been counted another man's property.

On Nov. 4, 2008, millions gathered at the ballot box to prove, once and for all, that, in large measure, we as a nation have healed from our disgraceful, self-inflicted wounds of racial abuse, bias and division.

That we could elect an African-American to lead the free world is indeed a very good thing.

We just happened to elect the wrong African-American.

In life, we sometimes find that the idea of a thing is far better than the thing itself. As a boy, I once ordered, from a comic book, a pair of X-ray glasses that promised to allow me to see the bones beneath my hand (my motives were a bit more ignoble). The two weeks it took for the glasses to arrive seemed like an eternity.

Once they did arrive, I ripped into the package and put them on, darting my head to-and-fro. It's difficult to express my level of disappointment. As I quickly discovered, the glasses merely formed a halo effect around objects, creating the illusion of transparency. I felt embarrassed. I got took.

Barack Obama's presidency has been a halo effect. Like I did so many years ago, in 2008 America fell victim to false advertising. As the past four years have demonstrated beyond any serious debate, the idea of President Obama was far better than the reality of President Obama. We were promised the world. We were promised transparency; but we were sold an illusion. We got took.

Indeed, during the 2008 campaign, a then-Sen. Barack Obama promised us that, if elected, we would look back upon the moment he took office and "tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth."

That was the idea of President Obama. That was what many good, well-meaning people voted for. That was the hope offered and the change promised.

That was not what we got.

Though it's certainly not a comprehensive analysis, during the second presidential debate, Mitt Romney, in response to Mr. Obama's attempts to gloss over his mounting leadership failures, summarized a few of the big ones. While addressing an audience member who, perhaps like you, voted for Obama in 2008, Romney observed, in part, the following:

I think you know better. I think you know that these last four years haven't been so good as the president just described and that you don't feel like you're confident that the next four years are going to be much better either. ...

He said that, by now, we'd have unemployment at 5.4 percent. The difference between where it is and 5.4 percent is 9 million Americans without work. ...

He said he would have, by now, put forward a plan to reform Medicare and Social Security, because he pointed out they're on the road to bankruptcy. He would reform them. He'd get that done. He hasn't even made a proposal on either one.

He said in his first year he'd put out an immigration plan that would deal with our immigration challenges. Didn't even file it.

This is a president who has not been able to do what he said he'd do. He said that he'd cut in half the deficit. He hasn't done that either. In fact, he doubled it.

He said that by now middle-income families would have a reduction in their health insurance premiums by $2,500 a year. It's gone up by $2,500 a year. And if Obamacare is ... implemented fully, it'll be another $2,500. ...

The middle class is getting crushed under the policies of a president who has not understood what it takes to get the economy working again. ... [T]he number of people who are still looking for work is still 23 million Americans.

There are more people in poverty, one out of six people in poverty.

How about food stamps? When he took office, 32 million people were on food stamps. Today, 47 million people are on food stamps. How about the growth of the economy? It's growing more slowly this year than last year -- and more slowly last year than the year before. ...

The president has tried, but his policies haven't worked.

Recently, my wife and I attended an outdoor festival in central Virginia. Although the event was not political, there were people from both the Obama and Romney camps handing out campaign stickers and other items. I suspect that if a poll were taken, liberals out-numbered conservatives by about two-to-one.

That's why I was so taken aback. Although we saw dozens of people wearing Romney stickers, we only saw one man wearing an Obama sticker.

We walked up to a fellow with a gray pony tail, John Lennon glasses and Birkenstocks. He was wearing a Romney sticker.

"Mind if I ask why you're voting for Mitt Romney?" I asked. "I assume you are."

His reply -- and these were his words, not mine -- was short and to the point:
"Because I refuse to be that stupid twice."

Changing one's mind doesn't always reveal a tendency toward indecision. Sometimes, changing one's mind reveals a tendency toward wisdom.

Matt Barber is an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He serves as vice president of Liberty Counsel Action.
Link


Home Front: Politix
How Obama's Opinions Changed Since the Election
2011-06-26
On Capitol Hill this year, one of President Obama's most troublesome critics has been Senator Obama.

President Obama, for instance, wants Congress to raise the national debt limit. But his opponents have brought up a statement that then-Sen. Barack Obama made in 2006: The first-term Democrat representing Illinois said that merely debating a debt-limit increase was "a sign of leadership failure."

"Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that the buck stops here," Obama said then. "Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. . . . I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit."
But it was politically expedient, then.
In April, Obama told ABC's George Stephanopoulos that his vote against raising the debt ceiling had been a mistake. He appealed to the current Congress to vote yes, saying that Sen. Obama was a bad example to follow.

President Obama now insists that he had the right to dispatch U.S. forces to the conflict in Libya without authorization from Congress.

"The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," Obama said four years ago.

"Senator Barack Obama would be among the Obama administration's fiercest critics," said Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Speaker Boehner. "In 2007, he urged Congress to stand up to the White House, but now . . . he's hiding behind the claim that there's nothing hostile about bombs, missile strikes and Predator drones."
Didn't we used to have an Irony Meter here? In the shop again?
Asked about the apparent contradictions last week, a White House spokesman said that "the president has already explained his position on each of these issues, and we will let those responses speak for themselves."
We already answered that question. Next!
Link


Home Front: Politix
Kondracke: Low Road Attacks Shouldn't Hinder Kirk in Illinois
2010-06-04
I confess upfront that I'm not neutral in this year's Illinois Senate race. For numerous reasons I'll stipulate, I'm rooting for GOP Rep. Mark Steven Kirk over Democratic State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias.

That said, the flap over Kirk's misstatements about his military service is reaching ridiculous proportions -- exaggerated into a mini-scandal by Democrats and both local and national media.

And now, the left is peddling sleazy allegations that Kirk is gay as payback for his vote -- cast for defensible reasons -- against repeal of the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

I've known Kirk for nearly 10 years, since his first term in Congress, and in 42 years in Washington, I've rarely encountered a Member with a greater range of expertise or better judgment.

He's the leader of the moderate Republican Tuesday Group and has formed in-depth bipartisan back-bench study groups on Iran and China that don't just study, but actually affect, U.S. policy.

Kirk persuaded the Bush administration to install the most advanced U.S. anti-missile radars in Israel to provide a (temporary) cushion against Israel's need to launch a military strike against Iran's growing missile arsenal.

He's also the original author of a bill -- passed overwhelmingly in both chambers -- to convince Iran to halt its nuclear weapons program by cutting off its gasoline imports.

He has developed relationships with top-level Chinese officials who have made him at times better informed about turns in Chinese policy than Bush and Obama cabinet officers.

And, as a one-time employee of the World Bank, Kirk has deepened his expertise in global finance, enabling him to worry knowledgeably about the dangers of America's debt burden.

Moreover, if Kirk got elected to the Senate, he'd bolster a "big tent" GOP center that's deeply challenged by right-wing "purifiers."

He'd join serious players such as Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker of Tennessee, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine in developing nonideologically-driven alternatives to Democratic policy.

At the same time, he enjoys the esteem of serious conservatives such as Rep. Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin.

As a House Member, Kirk bucked his party to support embryonic stem cell research and expanded children's health care. He also opposed -- wrongly, in my view -- oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Beyond national impact, Illinois would benefit from having a revived two-party system. Corrupt Republicans disgraced their party into impotence, and now Democrats -- led by impeached former Illinois Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich -- are reaping the consequences of having near-absolute power.

I do not know Giannoulias, 34, but his record suggests that he deserves to be trailing Kirk, 50, in a heavily Democratic state -- by 5 to 8 points, depending on the poll.

A basketball buddy of then-state Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), Giannoulias got elected state treasurer with Obama's backing on the strength of his background as chief loan officer of his family's apparently successful Broadway Bank.

But now the bank has collapsed because of shaky mortgage investments -- and, the Chicago Tribune has documented, $20 million in loans to two convicted organized crime figures.

And, as state treasurer, Giannoulias presided over the loss of $160 million in citizen funds invested in the state's college savings program.

There's evidence that the Obama White House wanted Giannoulias to withdraw from the race in favor of a more-electable candidate, but Kirk thinks Obama's inability to oust Rep. Joe Sestak (D) from the Pennsylvania Senate race has weakened his persuasiveness.

So, in what looks like a desperate effort to gain footing, Giannoulias and the Democratic National Committee are making a mountain -- with media help -- out of what Kirk admits were misstatements of his military record.

The substance is that Kirk has said -- more than once -- that he was named the Navy's Intelligence Officer of the Year in 1999 for his role during the air war against Serbian forces in Kosovo.

In fact, his unit received the Vice Admiral Rufus L. Taylor Award from the National Military Intelligence Association after being officially nominated by the Navy.

This misstatement is being likened to Democratic Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal's implication that he served "in" the Vietnam War when he actually served "during" it -- in the United States.

Democrats are also charging that Kirk has claimed he was "the only Member of Congress to serve in Operation Iraqi Freedom," which would be closer, but Kirk actually has made it clear that he served "stateside" during the Iraq War.

However, Kirk, a Navy Reserve commander, actually has flown in hostile environments in Iraq (during pre-war no-fly-zone operations) and Kosovo and has devoted time during Congressional recesses to serve twice in Afghanistan and often in the Pentagon.

Giannoulias has never served in the military.

Politico's Mike Allen sneered that "under the logic" of Kirk's unit award, "since I once worked at the Washington Post, I could say I won the Pulitzer Prize!"

Except, that Kirk actually was "the team leader" of the group that won the intelligence award, his commanding officer wrote at the time, and Kirk exhibited "unmatched managerial and planning skills" and "unmatched knowledge of foreign capabilities."

One superior wrote in a fitness report that Kirk was "head and shoulders above any other intelligence officer I have ever met."

In a statement issued in response to the flap, retired Capt. Clay Fearnow said Wednesday that, "when I nominated Mark for the Rufus Taylor Award, I thought it was more specific to Mark and not the team. In reality, there would have been no team without Mark Kirk's leadership and certainly there would have been no award."

On top of the military charges -- or rather, out from under a rock -- Michael Rogers, a professional "outer" of gay politicians, mainly Republican, is claiming that Kirk is gay. His blog post is gaining circulation.

It shouldn't make any difference if Kirk were gay -- married for 10 years, but divorced last year, Kirk has flatly denied it -- but Rogers' claims clearly have malicious intent and, if ever proven, could lead to Kirk's ouster from the military.

Rogers acted, he said, because Kirk voted against repeal of the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the House last week.

Kirk said he did so because the chiefs of staff of the Army, Navy and Air Force and the commandant of the Marine Corps all said that any policy change should await the outcome of a Pentagon study of allowing openly gay people to serve in the armed forces.

Even Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who supports the change, has said he wishes the House had waited to pass the bill until the study was complete.

Kirk told me he's waiting for the study to determine his position on gays in the military. That's entirely defensible.

On the merits, I think there's no question who ought to get elected in Illinois -- on talent, experience and judgment. But Illinois often plays by rules that have nothing to do with merit. I hope this year is different.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Wall Street cashes out investment in Chris Dodd
2010-04-20
If Chris Dodd hadn't been so cozy with the financial industry, he wouldn't have been hounded out of the Senate.

But if he weren't retiring, he wouldn't have a free hand to write the legislation to change the way the financial industry is regulated.

The financial industry built Dodd's career, so why shouldn't it profit from the demise of it? It's like a political credit-default swap. It's a perfect fit for the Goldman Sachs era on Wall Street: No matter who loses, they win.

Dodd had been on political auto pilot for decades, but he tried to liven things up with a run for the presidency in 2008.

The biggest investor in his presidential campaign was Connecticut-based hedge fund SAC Capital ($248,200). But the management teams at all of the big financial houses came across for Dodd's bid. Employees of Citigroup, Bear Stearns, Goldman and American International Group were all high on his donor list.

Despite moving his family to Iowa, he finished last in the state's Democratic caucuses -- behind Joe Biden and "uncommitted."

Worse for Dodd, his vanity candidacy tipped off Connecticut voters that something was amiss with their senior senator.

Dodd was elected to the House in 1974, just four years after his father had been driven from the Senate by a campaign finance scandal. In 1980, Dodd moved up to the Senate and mostly allowed his state to forget about him.

Dodd's legislative pursuits were deadly dull to voters but of great interest to the insurance and finance industries that dominate Connecticut. That Dodd, unknown in the rest of the country, could raise and spend $18 million on his absurd presidential candidacy is good evidence of how lucrative it is to focus on financial regulation in Washington.

Connecticut voters might have forgotten about his goofy Iowa campaign by now if it hadn't been for the bursting of the mortgage bubble.

In June 2008 Dodd proposed an aid package for subprime lenders, including Countrywide Financial. As Dodd was pushing the bailout, reporter Daniel Golden of Portfolio magazine discovered that the banking committee chairman had saved about $75,000 on two loans because of preferential treatment he received from Countrywide's then-chief executive officer, Angelo Mozilo.

As the mortgage market continued to melt down, Dodd was scrambling to protect his biggest political benefactors -- mortgage backers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Dodd had for years pushed rules to allow Fannie and Freddie to operate like private companies when it came to profits and like public companies when it came to losses. It made him very popular in Washington.

Fannie and Freddie provided safe harbors for politicians between gigs -- like the $320,000 Rahm Emanuel pocketed for a no-show seat on Freddie's board. But more importantly, the firms funded campaigns.

Dodd was the top recipient of Fannie and Freddie funds ($165,400 through 2008), but the two government-sponsored entities, as they are benignly called, shrewdly spread the wealth around, including $120,349 in donations to the church plate of then-Sen. Barack Obama.

Dodd pleaded for the Fannie and Freddie bailout that has so far cost $126 billion. When Dodd argued in support of the cash dump, he called the lenders "fundamentally strong."

Dodd was later caught in a shady deal on an Irish vacation cottage with a former Bear Stearns executive whom the senator had helped to get a pardon for insider trading from outgoing President Clinton.

But the electoral catastrophe for Dodd came in March 2009 when it was revealed that he inserted language in the Obama stimulus that allowed bailed-out insurance firm AIG to pay out $165 million in bonuses.

When he announced his retirement in January 2010, Dodd was losing in head-to-head polls to all Republican comers in a heavily Democratic state.

Since his political future caved in, Dodd has been working with great fervor to complete the financial legislation sought by Obama. Though the president wants Dodd to drop a $50 billion fund to cover the cost of future bailouts, he and Dodd agree that the idea of institutions being "too big to fail" should be codified in law.

If Dodd were running for re-election he would be under pressure to get tough on Wall Street. The Left wants the government to break up the big banks, and the Right wants to end bailouts permanently. But because he is on his way out, Dodd is free to ignore their demands.

Because an inappropriate relationship with the financial sector cost a senator his career, that senator is in a unique position to change the regulation of the financial sector without fear of political consequences.

It is an only-in-Washington story.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More