International-UN-NGOs | |
Head in the sand, OPEC sees no shale oil threat | |
2012-06-14 | |
OPEC oil producers are not worried about the shale revolution. They might need to re-run their numbers.
But thanks to new technologies like hydraulic fracturing now sucking away on North American soil, the continent is already self sufficient in natural gas, and is eyeing an even bigger landmark -- OPEC-free oil supplies. The U.S. was the fastest-growing non-OPEC oil producer in 2011 for the third year in succession, the annual BP statistical review released on Wednesday said. U.S. oil production is up 1 million bpd since 2006 to 7.84 million bpd, consumption is down 1.85 million to 18.84 million. "In 1990, North American reserves and production were falling but thanks to unconventional, proved reserves have risen 68 percent since then," ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance told an audience of OPEC ministers on Wednesday. "North America could become self sufficient in oil as well (as gas) by 2025," he said at a conference before OPEC's policy-setting meeting in Vienna. State oil company Saudi Aramco, the world number-one oil producer, has acknowledged the North American boom in shale, tar sands and other so-called unconventional production, but its prediction in November was far less explosive, at 6.6 million barrels a day - still well short of U.S. needs, and not until 2035. And OPEC ministers gathering to decide output policy caps took a very relaxed view of the threat that shale oil might pose. "Oil from the Middle East will always find a home," said Kuwaiti Oil Minister Hani Hussein. "And we have to wait to see more research to get a better idea about the impact of shale oil development." "No, I'm not worried at all, they are only projections," agreed Rafael Ramirez, his Venezuelan counterpart. He scoffed at the idea that "shale oil will come to the rescue of consumers, allowing them to shake off the yoke of OPEC." But the U.S. government's Energy Information Administration has repeatedly torn up its forecasts as shale and oil sands change the game at pace. So should OPEC fret a little more? "In some ways they should. Not because North America may become self sufficient, but for the reasons why," said Paul Stevens, a senior research fellow at the Chatham House Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. "Given the changes in technology involved, if that is applied elsewhere then the assumption that all future increase in global demand will be filled by OPEC is called into question." Stevens makes an important point. Unconventional oil reserves are spread in a different pattern from traditional ones. Even resource starved world number-one oil importer China has some, and non-OPEC Russia appears to have the biggest of them all. "If I was an OPEC minister I would be concerned," he said. "This could be significant." | |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | |||||
Putin ratchets up tension with Georgia | |||||
2009-08-13 | |||||
The plans enraged Georgia, just a day after the Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, irked the leadership of another post-Soviet foe, Ukraine. Kiev responded angrily when Medvedev wrote a letter to President Viktor Yushchenko accusing his country of distorting history, discriminating against Russian speakers and "obstructing" Russia's Black Sea fleet. The Kremlin had already mooted plans for military expansion into Abkhazia but Putin confirmed the scale of the budget for the first time today. "We will allot a very large amount of money -- 15 to 16bn roubles (£300m) -- for the development of our military base and strengthening of Abkhazia's state border next year," he told reporters, prior to visiting the republic. "This is an additional and serious guarantee of the security of Abkhazia and South Ossetia," he added. Tension between Russia and Georgia has been high since they marked the first anniversary of their five-day war in South Ossetia last week. In an interview with the Guardian, Georgia's deputy foreign minister, Alexander Nalbandov, said Russia's military expansion into Abkhazia violated the peace agreement brokered by the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy. "This is an illegal initiative on occupied territory and we call on the international community to condemn it," he said. Nato is increasingly nervous at Russia extending its power beyond its borders and expressed "concern" earlier this year over reports that Russia planned to increase its military footprint in Abkhazia. Only Russia and Nicaragua have recognised Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent and under international law the construction of bases on what is officially Georgian territory will be illegal.
"The common thread here is ultimately power projection," he said. "The most important part of Russian foreign policy is to be a regional leader, to have a kind of lordship over the neighbourhood. It wants to play a controlling influence in all of the former Soviet states." Moscow had expected less explicit US support for Ukraine and Georgia under President Barack Obama, and was now letting its displeasure be known, said Nixey. "We're seeing an incremental ratcheting up of the tension, which is how we got to where we were back in the Bush administration." Ariel Cohen, a Russia expert at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, said Russia's "trajectory towards annexation of Abkhazia" reflected its "increasingly assertive stance" and belief that the former Soviet region and eastern Europe are its "privileged sphere of interests". "In the context of pushing the reset button in relations, this is a poke in the eye for the US and the Europeans," he said. | |||||
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Indias Terror Stance Vexes Obama Amid Voter Ire at Pakistan |
2009-02-24 |
Indias 670 million voters may be about to set back President Barack Obamas campaign against Islamic militancy in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Indias ruling Congress Party, which heeded U.S. calls to avoid threatening its neighbor after Novembers Mumbai terrorist attack, is heading for elections that might push it from office. The opposition Bharatiya Janata Party, which accuses Congress of a soft approach toward terrorism, says India should consider blockading Pakistans main port and severing ties unless the government extradites 20 suspected militants. A less cooperative India would hamper Obamas effort to keep Pakistans army focused on fighting the Taliban and other guerrillas along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. The BJP is more hard-line now than when it was in power, says Gareth Price, head of the Asia program at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. Theres no question they would increase the pressure on Pakistan, and that would complicate matters for the Obama administration. The likeliest outcome, he says, may be a weak coalition government led by one of the two large parties and including some of Indias burgeoning small parties. This month, Pakistan ceded effective control of the Swat Valley, 250 kilometers (155 miles) northwest of Islamabad, in a truce with local Taliban. The Talibans gains threaten to further destabilize Afghan President Hamid Karzai and diminish pressure on al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, whos believed to be hiding in the region. The U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, visited all three countries last week to, in his words, listen and learn. Holbrooke said last week on PBSs NewsHour program that the administration was troubled and confused by the truce in Swat. Meanwhile, U.S. officials have criticized Karzais government, which Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said last month is plagued by limited capacity and widespread corruption. Obama on Feb. 18 ordered 17,000 more U.S. troops into Afghanistan as a first step in a new strategy likely to be unveiled late next month. By then, Indias election will be in full swing: Voting in the worlds most populous democracy is to take place in several phases and must be completed by May. Congress enters the campaign without history on its side: No ruling party has won re-election after serving a full term since Indira Gandhi led Congress to victory in 1971. Since the start of 2007, the party had lost ground in nine of 11 state elections, before winning three out of six late last year. It isnt even clear wholl lead the party. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, 76, was hospitalized last month for cardiac bypass surgery and had to reduce his workload. If he isnt able to carry the party banner, the succession is murky. Party leader Sonia Gandhi, the Italian-born widow of assassinated Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, has declined to assume a direct role in government. Congress hasnt said whether it will name her 34-year-old son, Rahul, to lead the party their family has dominated since India won its independence six decades ago. Rahul Gandhi is not ready, political scientist and commentator Harish Khare wrote in the Hindu, a national newspaper, on Jan. 30. Congress, he said, should avoid pitchforking the young man into the race. The campaign comes at a time when the global recession has crippled Indian exports, cutting growth in Asias third-largest economy to its slowest pace since 2003. India has lost 1 million jobs, the government said Jan. 29, and companies such as Bangalore-based Gokaldas Exports Ltd., the countrys largest clothing exporter, predict more firings. Meanwhile, an accounting scandal at Satyam Computer Services Ltd. has undermined Indias appeal to foreign investors. Indias benchmark Sensex stock index tumbled 50 percent in the past year, led by declines in Tata Motors Ltd. and property developer DLF Ltd. The rupee fell 24 percent against the dollar in the same period. The economy is the key to a very tough fight for Congress, says Mahesh Rangarajan, a political analyst at Delhi University. A nationwide poll last week by Indias CNN-IBN television network found 32 percent of respondents named the economy as the main election issue, compared with 21 percent who cited security and terrorism. No margin of error was given. India, with a population of 1.1 billion, will elect its lower house of parliament for a five-year term. Thirty-seven parties sit in the current chamber; since the early 1990s, governments have been coalitions headed by Congress or its main rival, the BJP, with smaller parties playing an increasing role. The BJP, which draws support from groups seeking to make India a more overtly Hindu state, criticized Congresss patience with Pakistan following the Mumbai attacks, which killed 164 people. It suggested a naval blockade of Karachi, Pakistans largest city, and on Feb. 8 urged Congress to consider breaking off all trade, transport, tourism and cultural ties. No improvement in India-Pakistan ties is likely during a three-month election season because of political pressures, says Lisa Curtis, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a research institute in Washington. It will probably be more difficult if the BJP wins to get back to an Indo-Pakistan dialogue, but I dont think its impossible, Curtis says. Still, the BJP, headed by L.K. Advani, 81, might not bring a radical departure from Congresss foreign policy. While the BJP-led government of then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee mobilized Indian troops against Pakistan after a 2001 guerrilla attack on Indias parliament, it later opened a process of detente with Pakistans then-ruler, General Pervez Musharraf. Under a BJP government, theres no question the rhetoric and language will be much tougher and aggressive, but it will just be rhetoric, says Olivier Louis, head of the India and South Asia program at IFRI, the French Institute for International Affairs in Paris. The election probably will sustain the growth of smaller parties rooted in the ethnic and linguistic groups that dominate many of Indias 28 states, says Walter Andersen, a retired State Department India specialist who heads the South Asia Studies Program at the School of Advanced International Studies in Washington. Rangarajan says the unknown quantity is the socialist- leaning Bahujan Samaj Party, which aims to mobilize minority and lower-caste groups. It swept aside Congress and other parties in Uttar Pradesh, Indias most populous state, in 2007. With all parties seeking votes by showing their readiness to get tough on terrorism, the biggest challenge to the Obama administrations calls for moderation would be another attack similar to Mumbai, says Vikram Sood, a former chief of Indias main intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing. In such a case, India would have to make at least a symbolic strike on Pakistani targets, Sood said in an interview. In such a case, Clinton should go to Islamabad and tell them to quietly take whats coming. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Russia And Georgia 'At War', Over 1000 Dead |
2008-08-08 |
Russian armored vehicles have entered the northern edges of the capital of the breakaway Georgian region of South Ossetia, the separatists' press service reported on its website on Friday. "Russian armored vehicles have entered the northern suburbs of Tskhinvali," the website cominf.org reported, adding that Georgian troops had started to retreat. Moscow said its troops were responding to a Georgian assault to re-take the breakaway region, and Georgia's pro-Western President Mikheil Saakashvili said the two countries were at war. Russia would cut air links with Georgia from midnight on Friday, the Russian Transport Ministry said. Saakashvili told BBC World television Russia had been massing troops on the northern border of Georgia for months. " They have been calling it training exercises, but they have not been concealing the fact that they are training these troops for use inside Georgia," he said. "The way the escalation went was we came first under extensive artillery barrage from the separatists ... but in the end I was told that Russian armored vehicles started to cross the Georgian border. And that was exactly the moment when I had to take this decision to fire back." The United States on Friday asserted its support for Georgia's territorial integrity and urged an immediate ceasefire. NATO and the European Union have joined calls for a halt to fighting. State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos also said the United States was sending an envoy to the region "to engage with the parties in the conflict." U.S. President George W. Bush discussed the situation with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in Beijing, where world leaders were attending the opening of the Olympic Games, the White House said, giving no further information. A South Ossetia minister said more than a thousand people had died in overnight shelling by Georgian forces of their capital Tskhinvali, Russia's RIA news agency reported. "According to our information, as a result of the night-time shelling of Tskhinvali ... the number of fatalities is more than a thousand," Nationalities Minister Teimuraz Kasaev told the news agency by telephone. A senior Georgian security official said Russian planes had bombed the Vaziani military outside the Georgian capital Tbilisi. The Interior Ministry said later three Georgian soldiers were killed. Political analysts saw Georgia's bid to re-take its rebel region of South Ossetia by force as a gamble by its leader that he could still count on Western support in a clash with Russia. "He is in big danger of losing the cachet he built up for himself in being pro-Western and the restraint he has often shown in the face of provocation by Russia," said James Nixey, analyst at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London,. "If he is going to start a war, he is going to lose the support of a lot of friends in the West." Saakashvili, who wants to take his small Caucasus nation into NATO, has made it a priority to win back control of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, another rebel region on the Black Sea. The issue has bedeviled Georgia's relations with Russia, angered by Tbilisi's moves towards the Western fold and its pursuit of NATO membership. As fighting raged, the roar of warplanes and the explosion of heavy shells resounded more than three km (two miles) from Tskhinvali. Many houses were ablaze. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the Georgians of driving people from their homes. "We are receiving reports that a policy of ethnic cleansing was being conducted in villages in South Ossetia, the number of refugees is climbing, the panic is growing, people are trying to save their lives," he said in televised remarks from the ministry. The crisis, the first to confront Russian President Dmitry Medvedev since he took office in May, has flared in a region emerging as a key energy transit route, and where Russia and the West are vying for influence. It dented sentiment on Russia's benchmark equity index, which fell more than 4 percent to a 14-month low while the rouble lost more than 1 percent against a basket of currencies. Medvedev vowed to defend Russian "compatriots" in South Ossetia, where most people have been given Russian passports. "We will not allow their deaths to go unpunished," Interfax quoted him as saying. The majority of the roughly 70,000 people living in South Ossetia are ethnically distinct from Georgians. They say they were forcibly absorbed into Georgia under Soviet rule and now want to exercise their right to self-determination. |
Link |
India-Pakistan | |
Mysterious crowd suddenly stopped Bhutto's car, officer says | |
2008-01-14 | |
Two new reports on the assassination last month of Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto suggest that the killing may have been an ambitious plot rather than an isolated act of violence and that the government of President Pervez Musharraf knows far more than it's admitted about the murder. Pay attention, they're about to float another trial balloon! A police officer who witnessed the assassination said that a mysterious crowd stopped Bhutto's car that day, moving her to emerge through the sunroof. And a document has surfaced in the Pakistani news media that contradicts the government's version of her death and contains details on the pistol and the suicide bomb used in the murder. The witness was Ishtiaq Hussain Shah of the Rawalpindi police. As Bhutto's car headed onto Rawalpindi's Liaquat Road after an election rally Dec. 27 , a crowd appeared from nowhere and stopped the motorcade, shouting slogans of her Pakistan Peoples Party and waving party banners, according to his account. Popped up out of the manhole covers they did!
A perfectly natural reaction to someone under threat of assasination! If you're a Pakistani. It was Shah's job to clear the way for the motorcade. But 10 feet from where he was standing, a man in the crowd wearing a jacket and sunglasses raised his arm and shot at the former prime minister. "I jumped to overpower him," the deputy police superintendent said later. "A mighty explosion took place soon afterwards." Shah suffered multiple injuries and is recuperating in a Rawalpindi military hospital, guarded by agents of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence directorate. Who organized the crowd is only one of the mysteries two weeks after the assassination. "I don't know who they were or from where they came," the Rawalpindi officer told Dawn newspaper. "They just appeared on the road." Yep. Big mystery. Don't ever get crowds in Pakistan. The second report emerged in the Pakistani daily newspaper The News, with detailed information about the pistol and bomb. It rejects the government's conclusion that Bhutto died when the force of the suicide blast threw her head against the sunroof lever of her car. Such an impact couldn't have fractured her skull, it said. The government refused to confirm the report's authenticity, but a security official verified it to McClatchy . He spoke only on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject. According to the document, which the paper described as a "top agency" preliminary report, a pistol made by Norinco, a Chinese brand, was recovered from the scene, with the lot number 311-90. An MUV-2 triggering mechanism for the bomb also was found, as had been used in 15 previous suicide bombings in Pakistan , with the same lot number and factory code. "It is a clear indicator that the Another mystery of the case is why so valuable a report has been buried. Among its other conclusions: Bhutto's assassin, after shooting her, detonated his own suicide belt. No ambulance was called, and it took 25 minutes to get her to the hospital, only two miles from the scene. Bhutto, and her security adviser Rehman Malik , had complained repeatedly that she was given inadequate official security, including mobile phone jammers that didn't work and less than the four-vehicle escort that she thought was needed to protect the four corners of her car. In an e-mail to her U.S. lobbyist, Mark Siegel , in late October, Bhutto wrote that if anything happened to her "I would hold Musharraf responsible," in addition to four individuals she named as plotting to kill her in a letter sent to Musharraf on Oct. 16 . There was no security cordon around Bhutto who'd escaped a suicide bombing attack Oct. 18 , the day she returned to Pakistan from self-imposed exile abroad as she left the park in Rawalpindi. The crime scene was cleared immediately and hosed down, destroying vital evidence. Doctors at the hospital where she was taken, who announced the night it happened that she'd died of bullet wounds to the head and neck, changed their story the next day. There was no autopsy. Musharraf's government has stuck to its explanation that Bhutto died when she hit her head on the sunroof's lever after the bomb went off, despite the emergence of several videos that show the gunman firing, then Bhutto disappearing into her vehicle before the blast. Officials also turned up what they said was a transcript of a telephone conversation between the supposed masterminds militant Islamists allied with the Taliban congratulating each other, the next day. Scotland Yard detectives, whom Musharraf called in under pressure from home and abroad, have been told that they're to investigate only the cause of death, not the killer's identity. "Providing clarity regarding 'The precise cause of Ms. Bhutto's death' is said to be the principal purpose of the deployment," said Aidan Liddle , a spokesman for the British High Commission in Islamabad . To many in Pakistan , it all raises questions about whether the government was complicit in the assassination. To others, it points at the very least to a concerted attempt to hide the massive extent of a security failure. Bhutto's own private-security arrangements seemed poor, chaotic and amateurish. Armored cars are not fitted with sunroofs. Hers was modified in Karachi against all safety advice, according to a security company that operates in that city but spoke only on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject. After Bhutto's death, her husband made the startling revelation that she'd been guarded by men he'd met in prison. "Both the state and the internal security of the Pakistan Peoples Party failed miserably," said Masood Sharif Khattak , who was the head of the Intelligence Bureau , Pakistan's top civilian intelligence agency, while Bhutto was prime minister and now is retired. "But state responsibility (for her security) stands first and foremost." "The fact that there are so many suicide bombings taking place in the country, and the security and intelligence apparatus is unable to prevent them, only leads to one conclusion: The jihadists have enablers within the system that allow them to do their stuff," said Kamran Bokhari of Strategic Forecasting, a consultancy based in Austin, Texas . "We're not talking high-level officials, just people at midlevel, but mostly junior, who could provide them with logistics to operate." Musharraf has denied that government agencies are involved at any level. OK, now we know for sure he's lying. One of the most widely suspected forces behind Bhutto's assassination, al Qaida, hasn't claimed responsibility. The Pakistani militant whom the government has blamed, Baitullah Mehsud, has denied it. Mehsud is a 34-year-old tribal leader in the lawless Waziristan region, in the northwest, who's emerged as the leader of Pakistan's version of the Taliban. Dr. Farzana Shaikh , associate fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London , said: "If they (al Qaida) are intent on weakening Musharraf and his regime, they could do no better than this. For them to simply leave room open for speculation, much of which has centered on government complicity, would be a very clever move." Of course, this theory would only have legs if Musharraf were foolish enough to play along! /sarc "That people are willing to believe this is a very telling reflection of the declining credibility of the Musharraf regime." If they held off the election until after W retired perhaps they could put him on the ballot for PM. | |
Link |
Africa North | |
Mass Trial of Islamists Accused of Terror Plot Begins in Morocco | |
2007-03-22 | |
![]() Morocco's security services said at the time of their arrest last August that the suspects were planning an even bigger attack than the bombings that killed 45 people in Casablanca in May 2003. More than 3,000 people have been arrested since then and hundreds convicted of terrorism charges. The round-up reportedly followed tip-offs from the British and German intelligence services. Terrorism is back on the agenda after a suicide bomber blew himself up in a cybercafe in the Sidi Moumen slum neighbourhood of Casablanca this month and a new wave of arrests last week. On Monday magistrates charged a man with leading the military wing of the Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group and taking part in both the Casablanca attacks and the Madrid train bombings of 2004. The mass trial, in Rabat, will be closely watched for evidence of the true scale of the threat to the kingdom of 30 million, and for signs that the secular-minded government can balance its fight against terrorism with respect for human rights and political Islam - especially in an election year. The Ansar al-Mehdi group, led by Hassan el-Khattab, known as Abu Osama, is said to have recruited members of the police and the armed forces, ringing alarm bells in a country with a long history of military coups. The group has been compared to the Algerian-based GSPC, which recently declared allegiance to al-Qaida, and there are suggestions the two may have plans to link up for regional activity. Alleged targets of planned suicide attacks included a military airfield, the US embassy in Rabat, and tourist destinations. Police seized explosives of a type similar to those used in the Casablanca attacks and detonators similar to those used in the Madrid bombings. Human rights groups and lawyers claim the defendants have been mistreated and evidence obtained under duress. But foreign observers say the trial seems to have been carefully prepared. If convicted, the accused face up to 30 years in prison. One consequence of the arrests was the cancellation of Morocco's system of compulsory military service to deprive jihadists of the experience of weapons training at the expense of the state. Another has been to focus attention on the role of social deprivation in a country with a fast-growing, liberalising economy but a huge gap between the elite and the poor. "This is about impoverishment, ignorance and discontent linking up to a wider cause," said Claire Spencer, a Maghreb expert at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. | |
Link |
Terror Networks |
Ayman keeps al-Qaeda in his grip |
2006-04-16 |
In January 2003, one of the two most wanted men in the world couldn't contain his frustration. From a hiding place probably somewhere in South Asia, he tapped out two lengthy e-mails to a fellow Egyptian who'd been criticizing him in public. "I beg you, don't stop the Muslim souls who trust your opinions from joining the jihad against the Americans," wrote Ayman al-Zawahiri, deputy leader of al-Qaeda. He fired off the message even though it risked exposing him. "Let's put it this way: Tensions had been building up between us for a long time," explained the e-mail's recipient, Montasser el-Zayat, a Cairo lawyer who shared a prison cell with Zawahiri in the 1980s and provided this account. "He always thinks he is right, even if he is alone." Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Zawahiri has broadcast his views to the world relentlessly. Despite a $25 million price on his head, he has published memoirs, given interviews and recorded a dozen speeches that find their way to the Internet and television. Video of a speech was posted Thursday on a Web site. Zawahiri's visibility, eclipsing Osama bin Laden's, reminds al-Qaeda's enemies that the network is capable of more attacks. But a closer look at his speeches and writings, and interviews with several longtime associates in radical Islamic circles, suggest another motive: fear of losing his ideological grip over a revolutionary movement he has nurtured for 40 years. The success of the Sept. 11 hijackings temporarily united al-Qaeda's feuding factions under the leadership of bin Laden and Zawahiri. But now long-standing ideological and tactical disputes have resurfaced, according to analysts and former Zawahiri associates. The schisms are reflected in Zawahiri's many speeches, in which he has attempted to assert influence over a host of seemingly unrelated issues: the war in Iraq, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, elections in Egypt, oil production in Saudi Arabia and obscure questions of Muslim theology. He is risking his credibility among Islamic radicals by speaking out on so many subjects, according to Osama Rushdi, an Egyptian who spent three years in a Cairo prison with Zawahiri in the 1980s and now lives in exile in Britain. "He's trying to stay in control and give the impression that he's behind everything in the Middle East and everywhere else, fighting against the Americans in Iraq and against Britain in Europe," Rushdi said in an interview. "He is trying to take responsibility as a leader for what is going on in Iraq. But he knows, and everyone knows, that that is not true, that he has nothing to do with anything in Iraq." Al-Qaeda was founded as a decentralized coalition of Islamic extremists. That structure has complicated efforts by intelligence services to penetrate the network. But the lack of clear chains of command also can make it difficult for leaders to maintain control. Terrorism analysts said that with the Sept. 11 attacks, al-Qaeda unleashed events that are now largely outside of its control. With Zawahiri and bin Laden in hiding, most likely in Pakistan, new leaders such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in Iraq have emerged as potential rivals who follow their own script. Others have launched attacks in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East, sometimes in the name of al-Qaeda but usually as independent operators with their own agendas. "What they've started has taken on a momentum of its own," said Maha Azzam, an associate fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. "Obviously, this is a global movement. And it has global support, and it can't be controlled centrally as much as perhaps they'd like it to be. It's almost as if Zawahiri doesn't want to be left behind. They don't want the events on the ground to supersede them." On March 4, President Bush was wrapping up a visit to Pakistan, where two months earlier a CIA drone had staged a missile strike in a failed attempt to kill Zawahiri. Shortly before the president's departure, Zawahiri provided another taunting reminder of his elusiveness. In a videotape aired by the al-Jazeera satellite television network, the 54-year-old Egyptian surgeon once again blasted the U.S. military and political presence in the Middle East. But the bulk of his lecture was aimed at another radical Islamic movement: Hamas, which swept to victory in the Jan. 25 elections in the Palestinian territories. Zawahiri congratulated Hamas on its political success, but he also offered a stern warning: Avoid the temptation to work with "secular" Palestinian legislators, and never compromise on efforts to establish strict Islamic law, or sharia. "Power is not an end in itself. Real power is application of sharia on earth," he said. "Entering the same parliament as the lay people, recognizing their legitimacy and the accords they have signed is contrary to Islam." The lecture echoed comments made by Zawahiri on Jan. 6, when he ripped the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood for taking part in last year's elections in his native Egypt, where the al-Qaeda figure got his start in radical Islamic politics as a teenager and medical student. The Brotherhood, he said, was "duped, provoked and used" by the United States. Zawahiri and other radicals have argued that taking part in Western-style elections is incompatible with Islam -- democracy, he has said, is an assault on God's right to rule. With groundbreaking elections taking place in Iraq, Egypt, the Palestinian territories and even Saudi Arabia, Zawahiri and his ideological allies fear that popular sentiment in the Middle East could be turning against their goal of establishing a united caliphate to rule over the world's entire Muslim population, many al-Qaeda experts contend. Kamal Habib is a former leader of the radical Egyptian Islamic Jihad, the network that Zawahiri joined as a young doctor. After serving a decade in prison for attempting to overthrow the Egyptian government, Habib has embraced nonviolence and is considered an authority on militant Islam. In an interview in Cairo, he noted that Zawahiri's video messages have recently delved into the subjects of freedom and democracy. "The Arab world has witnessed change over the last year or two that is almost equivalent to the amount of change that occurred over the previous two decades," Habib said in an interview in Cairo. "He can't remain isolated from these changes. He has to respond to them." Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical militant Islamic groups that Zawahiri has criticized generally have been reluctant to respond in public. But Hany el-Sibaai, another Egyptian exile in Britain who has known Zawahiri for years, predicts a change if the United States leaves Iraq. "After America withdraws its troops, I think the debate will break into the open, said Sibaai, who leads the al-Maqreze Center for Historical Studies in London. "It will be, 'Why did you do this? Why did you go that way?' " Some of the sharpest tactical differences within al-Qaeda have come to a head in Iraq. According to intelligence officials in the Middle East and Europe, a growing rivalry has developed between Zawahiri and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian who leads the al-Qaeda faction in Iraq. Although Zawahiri has been reduced to launching rhetorical attacks from hideouts, Zarqawi has gained notoriety and respect among jihadists as an aggressive commander who continues to defy the U.S. military. Zarqawi pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda two years ago, but analysts and officials suspect that their alliance is a marriage of convenience. Before the invasion of Iraq, Zarqawi kept his distance from the group, operating his own training camps. He has also held different strategic objectives: the overthrow of the monarchy in his native Jordan and war against Israel, neither of which have been priorities for al-Qaeda. "There's nothing in common between these two guys," said Diaa Rashwan, a researcher at the al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies in Cairo. "They were two different people from different places with a different history. I have my doubts about whether the two guys are really with the same organization." In October, U.S. intelligence officials released a letter they said was written by Zawahiri to his "gracious brother" Zarqawi. Some independent analysts have questioned its authenticity and have charged the U.S. government with inflating al-Qaeda's role in Iraq for political reasons. Several former Zawahiri associates interviewed for this article said they believe the letter is genuine and accurately reflects some of al-Qaeda's internal conflicts. In the letter dated July 9, 2005, Zawahiri warned Zarqawi that gory tactics that had made him famous in Iraq -- the videotaped beheadings of hostages and bombings of Shiite holy sites -- risked alienating ordinary Muslims. Although the Egyptian said he agreed such acts were religiously justified, sustaining public support was more important. His advice: Kill hostages by gunshot instead, and concentrate attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces. "You shouldn't be deceived by the praise of some of the zealous young men and their description of you as the sheikh of the slaughterers," wrote Zawahiri, who like Zarqawi is a Sunni Muslim. "We are in a battle, and more than half of this battle is taking place in the battlefield of the media. And this media battle is a race for the hearts and minds of our people." If subsequent events are any indication, Zarqawi's response to the advice has been mixed. The number of decapitations has declined, and there is evidence that Zarqawi has taken a lower profile to give Iraqi insurgents a more visible leadership role. At the same time, attacks on Shiite mosques have increased. In November, his organization asserted responsibility for coordinated suicide bombings that killed 60 people at two hotels in Amman, Jordan, half of them members of a wedding party. Public reaction was as Zawahiri predicted: More than 100,000 Jordanians took to the streets, the largest mass protests in the Muslim world against an al-Qaeda-sponsored terrorist attack. About the same time, Zawahiri produced another videotape, although it did not surface publicly until this week, posted on a radical Islamic Web site. Perhaps mindful of reports of internal dissension, Zawahiri defended the Jordanian insurgent as "my beloved brother" and urged Muslims to rally behind him. "I have lived with him up close and seen nothing but good from him," Zawahiri said. "The Islamic nation must support the heroic holy warriors in Iraq, who are fighting on the very front line for the dignity of Islam." Zawahiri's sensitivity to public opinion can be traced to his days as chief of Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Its target since the 1960s was what it calls "the near enemy," the Egyptian government, which they consider corrupt and un-Islamic. In 1993, group members trying to assassinate an Egyptian official accidentally killed an 11-year-old girl. An angry public response, combined with a renewed government crackdown on radicals, severely weakened the network. This and other setbacks helped drive Zawahiri into exile in Afghanistan. "His organization inside Egypt was almost completely eliminated," said Kamal Habib, the former Islamic Jihad leader, who abandoned the group after he was sentenced to 10 years in prison. In 1998, Zawahiri sought to rescue Islamic Jihad by creating a formal alliance with bin Laden's nascent al-Qaeda network called the International Islamic Front Against Crusaders and Jews. The new target would be "the far enemy," the United States and other Western powers seen as protectors of secular Arab governments. The decision sparked a rebellion in the ranks of Islamic Jihad. Zawahiri had failed to consult with other senior members of the group before ordering a drastic shift in its core mission. "Many people said, 'Why would I want to fight the White House and Tony Blair?' " said Yasser al-Sirri, another Egyptian exile in London who has known Zawahiri for more than a decade. "But it was his only choice then, to be allied with bin Laden. He hadn't been successful in Egypt because he had made mistakes and surrounded himself with the wrong people. They were always fighting and arguing among themselves." The internal feuding continued even as the new al-Qaeda under Zawahiri and bin Laden gained prominence for sponsoring the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa and the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen two years later. E-mails recovered from an al-Qaeda computer in Kabul after the invasion of Afghanistan show a steady stream of bitter message traffic between Zawahiri and his followers during this period, with running arguments over money, ideology and authority. The Sept. 11 plot's success brought the squabbling to a temporary halt. But Zawahiri seems to have realized that the feuding would eventually resume and challenge his ideological authority, said el-Zayat, the lawyer who reported receiving in 2003 the admonishing e-mails from the al-Qaeda theoretician. Intelligence analysts said they believe the e-mails are genuine but that it is impossible to confirm with certainty that Zawahiri was the author. "I'm sure he has the vision to bring the network back together, but I don't think he will be able to do that," Zayat said. "He hasn't changed. It's as if I'm listening to him in a prison cell in 1981. Except for some white hair, he is the same." |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran | |||
Tough Year for Assad So Far | |||
2005-09-27 | |||
![]()
With few friends left to turn to, Assad flew to Egypt on Sunday to enlist the help of Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak, a longtime U.S. ally, according to two officials familiar with their talks. Mubarak advised Assad to fully cooperate with the probe and surrender any Syrians U.N. investigators name as accomplices in the killing. The Egyptian leader also counseled Assad to order a halt to harshly anti-U.S. comments by Syrian officials and in the state-run media. But Mubarak's plea for cooperation is potentially difficult for Assad because the U.N. search for conspirators could lead them to senior Syrian security officials, members of Assad's inner circle or even relatives.
Syria's media, a mirror for government thinking, all but ignored Mehlis last week when he visited Syria to question officials in connection with Hariri's killing. Neither he nor Syria disclosed the names of those questioned, but Lebanese media said they included Syria's last intelligence chief in Lebanon, Brig. Gen. Rustum Ghazale, two aides and Syrian Interior Minister Ghazi Kenaan, who was intelligence chief in Lebanon until five years ago. The Syrian media's treatment of Mehlis' visit, says dissident Michel Kilo, showed the absence of a cohesive government strategy to deal with a potentially dangerous issue. "There has been confusion in the way we dealt with all major issues in the past two years," said Kilo, reached in Damascus by telephone. "If half of what we hear is true, then we are faced with a very dangerous situation and have reason to be very concerned." Syria has denied involvement in the Hariri killing. On the issue of Iraq, it says it is doing everything it can to stop militants from using its territory to join insurgents there. It also says it has no intelligence operatives left in Lebanon after it completed a troop pullout under pressure last April. However, a series of bombings in Lebanon targeting anti-Syrian figures has raised questions about how much influence Syria retains there. Political talk show host May Chidiac was the latest victim. She had just started her car Sunday when a bomb exploded, ripping off an arm and a leg. Chidiac worked for the private Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation, which opposes a Syrian role in Lebanon. ![]()
| |||
Link |
Arabia |
Shaking The Timbers Of The House Of Saud |
2004-05-13 |
The U.S. Embassy security officer didnât mince words. "You should get the f--- out of here," he told representatives of American companies at a May 4 meeting in Riyadh. After gunmen killed five employees of engineering firm ABB Lummus Global at a refinery part-owned by Exxon Mobil Corp. at Yanbu on May 1, expats in the kingdom are listening. ABB has evacuated about 90 employees, and other companies are reducing head counts. It is dawning on everyone who does business with the kingdom that the Saudi government is locked in a long, vicious struggle with Islamic militants that threatens to send wave after wave of jitters through the oil markets and shake the timbers of the House of Saud. Oil prices hit 13- year highs of almost $39 per barrel on May 4 as traders panicked about the possibility of disruptions of shipments from the worldâs largest exporter. With only 2 million to 3 million barrels per day of spare capacity in the world, any disruption of Saudi crude flows would send prices into the stratosphere. A mass exodus of Western oil technicians could also have a long-term impact on the Saudisâ ability to manage their industry. Saudi oil officials say the worries about supply outages are exaggerated and that their facilities can function in the toughest environments. "Itâs going to take a lot more than people running around shooting AK-47s to disrupt our operations," says Sadad Husseini, who recently retired as executive vice-president for exploration and production at Saudi Aramco. But traders arenât listening. "If something happens in Saudi Arabia, the futures markets are going to react swiftly and upward," says Adam Sieminski, an oil analyst at Deutsche Bank in London. The betting is that the markets wonât relax about Saudi Arabia soon. While the Saudis have woken up to the dangers posed by Islamic fanaticism, diplomats in the kingdom are skeptical that they have the skills to deal with committed militants. Moreover, the reforms that many Saudis think are needed to assuage growing discontent seem to be losing momentum. "If you donât have genuine, comprehensive reforms, more young men will throw themselves in the arms of the jihadis," says Mai Yamani, research fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. Now thereâs a BGO (Blinding Glimpse of the Obvious). Under Crown Prince Abdullah, the kingdom has whipped its often shaky finances into shape, thanks in part to booming oil revenues. But hoped-for political changes such as elections for the Consultative Council have been slow to materialize. The Crown Prince promised elections for municipal councils this fall, but preparations are lagging. Another shocking lack of progress by the House of Saud. Particularly discouraging were the arrests in late March of a dozen moderate reformists on the eve of a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell. Apparently hard-liners in the royal family were alarmed at calls for a constitutional monarchy and wanted to send a message to the U.S. to back off on its push for democracy. "All we have heard is promises; we havenât seen a single sign of practical reform," says Mohsen Al-Awajy, a leading critic of the government. Events in Iraq such as the siege of Fallujah have energized the Saudi jihadists. "Join the brothers in Fallujah," shouted the killers in Yanbu as they displayed a dragged corpse to students at a school. In such an atmosphere, the royals are likely to hunker down and take few risks. And this represents a major strategy shift in exactly what way? Man, like the tortoise, makes no progress unless he sticks his neck out. - ANCIENT GREEK SAYING - A lack of any risk-taking is merely turning turtle right now. Someone needs to spell this out to the Saudis in no uncertain terms. |
Link |
Iraq-Jordan |
Iraq Coalition Aims to `Destroyâ Rebel Mahdi Army |
2004-04-07 |
The U.S.-led coalition in Iraq aims to ``destroyââ the Mahdi army of Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr after clashes that left more than 100 Iraqis and 30 U.S. soldiers and Marines dead, U.S. Army Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt said. Coalition forces and followers of al-Sadr have fought the past four days in Baghdad, Najaf, Nassiriyah and other Iraqi cities. Al-Sadr, whose Mahdi army numbers about 3,000, according to the U.S. military, has called for coalition troops to withdraw from the country. U.S. forces, Iraqi police and other coalition soldiers ``are conducting operations to destroy the Mahdi army,ââ Kimmitt said at a Baghdad press conference carried live by Cable News Network. ``These militias that take to violence will become targets.ââ The uprising in the south of Iraq by supporters of al-Sadr, 31, has led to clashes with U.S., British, Italian and other coalition troops. Al-Sadr could put an end to the violence by turning himself in to Iraqi police, Kimmitt said. Al-Sadr is the subject of an arrest warrant in connection with the killing of cleric Abdul Majid al-Khoei last April. The coalition last week closed down a newspaper run by al-Sadr supporters, and arrested one of his aides, Mustafa Yacoubi, also in connection with al-Khoeiâs murder. Coalition forces are also fighting militias in areas that are predominantly Sunni Muslim. An Iraqi armed force killed 12 U.S. soldiers west of Baghdad as the U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said coalition forces isolated the city of Fallujah. White House spokesman Scott McClellan confirmed the soldiers were killed in an attack late yesterday. The attack took place near Ramadi, 48 kilometers to the west of Fallujah, when U.S. units were fired on by as many as 70 Iraqis armed with rocket-propelled grenades. At least 30 Iraqis were killed in clashes with U.S. forces in Fallujah. Fallujah and Ramadi are in the so-called Sunni Triangle north and west of Baghdad where most of resistance to the occupation has taken place. Recent attacks have ``put a lot of strain on the resources of the coalition,ââ Adnan Pachachi, an Iraqi Governing Council member, said today on British Broadcasting Corp. radio. A pull out of U.S.-led forces would be a ``disasterââ because ``there would be absolutely no force that can control the situation.ââ Followers of al-Sadr may have entered the Sunni Muslim region to carry out the attack in Ramadi, AFP cited an unidentified U.S. defense official as saying. ``Moqtada al-Sadr and his movement do not represent the views of the entire Shia population,ââ interim Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari yesterday told reporters at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. ``They are a small minority.ââ Other clerics, including Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, spiritual leader of Iraqâs Shiites, ``are keeping their distance from this movement.ââ Iraqâs Shiites, who make up 60 percent of the countryâs 25 million people, were prevented from holding power under Saddam Husseinâs Sunni Muslim regime that was ousted in April last year. British troops on Monday negotiated an end to the occupation of the governorâs office in the U.K.-controlled southern city of Basra by Iraqis loyal to al-Sadr. Sistani yesterday called for calm and the restoration of law and order, AFP said, citing Sheikh Abdel Mahdi al-Karbalai, a representative of Sistani. ``We hope to settle this problem peacefully,ââ al-Karbalai said. ``Sadr is an immediate problem that has to be dealt with,ââ U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said in a radio interview yesterday, according to a State Department transcript. ``His army, the Mahdi, has to be dealt with.ââ The U.S. began its operation at Fallujah to search for people involved in last weekâs killing of four U.S. civilian guards as their convoy passed through the city. Their bodies were mutilated, dragged and hanged from a bridge by an Iraqi mob. Rumsfeld said yesterday in Norfolk, Virginia that U.S. forces are conducting raids in Fallujah against ``high-value targetsââ and had captured some anti-coalition fighters. U.S. President George W. Bush discussed the Fallujah operation with advisers including Rumsfeld, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, McClellan said late yesterday in a conference call with reporters. McClellan described Bushâs call as ``an update on military operations,ââ and declined to say whether the subject of increasing U.S. forces in Iraq was raised. Rumsfeld said at his briefing he would be open to proposals by commanders in Iraq for more soldiers or equipment, though no plan had yet been sent to Washington. ``At the present time they have not requested a change in their plan,ââ Rumsfeld said at a news conference with North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer. ``They will decide what they need and they will get what they need.ââ |
Link |
Axis of Evil |
U.S. expected to attack Iraq within weeks |
2003-01-29 |
A U.S.-led military force is likely to strike Iraq within three weeks, and will aim to secure victory by the end of March, military analysts predicted yesterday. Following Monday's critical report by United Nations weapons inspectors, military experts said their best guess now is that an attack will begin shortly after Feb. 14, the date of the inspectors' next report. As far as I can tell, that's about when most all the forces enroute will be in place. Many experts believe a large ground force would have to sweep through Iraq before the beginning of April, when the oppressive summer weather sets in. They also see the intense diplomatic manoeuvring and the U.S. military buildup in the Persian Gulf area as pointing strongly toward an imminent war. Pentagon planners are mindful that Feb. 15 marks the end of the Muslim holiday Eid al-Adha. Attacking during this important festival would further offend Iraq's neighbours and supporters in the Muslim world. I had forgotten about Eid al-Adha. That's the journey to Mecca all muslims are supposed to make at least once. It makes some sense to wait until that's over. Rosemary Hollis of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London sees war coming shortly after that, and believes the conflict will quickly expand beyond Iraq, with a devastating Israeli attack against the Palestinian Hamas group and on Lebanon-based Hezbollah. We can only hope. In the meantime, the U.S. administration is still trying to line up its diplomatic blocks. Part of that process will entail some serious arm-twisting at the Security Council, where Washington still hopes to push through a new resolution authorizing the use of force. Yesterday, Russia appeared to move closer to the U.S. stand, with Russian President Vladimir Putin warning that Moscow "may change its position" if Iraq is hampering inspectors. Moscow may not vote "Yes", but I don't think they'll veto. Next week, in a final effort to portray Iraq as an imminent threat, Washington is expected to disclose long-promised evidence of Baghdad's hidden weapons of mass destruction. It is also expected to apply yet more pressure on Turkey and Saudi Arabia to secure tacit but full co-operation in an attack. Washington has been shipping troops and military hardware to the region for weeks, and roughly 100,000 U.S. and British troops are either in place or on their way. The Pentagon clearly wants more: Its stated goal is to have about 150,000 soldiers ready for battle by mid-February. A prime consideration will preclude Washington from sitting on its heels much beyond the end of February: the weather. Ahhhhh! The Dreaded Iraqi Summer! It comes right after that brutal Afghan Winter. What will we do? U.S. officials have sought to play down that factor as the Pentagon draws up plans to attack and occupy one of the hottest countries in the world. "Many battles have been fought in the heat of summer," Secretary of State Colin Powell said recently. Nonetheless, any assault would be greatly complicated if left too late. From December until about mid-March, temperatures in Iraq usually range between 7 and 24 degrees. But as April approaches, the heat begins building, often reaching the low 40s by June, along with raging, machinery-clogging dust storms. Even in a conventional war, that would be a daunting environment. The U.S. assumption is that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein still has chemical weapons, and would deploy them. That means that many of the invaders will be kitted out in sealed chemical-warfare suits that are all but impossible to use in fierce heat. "What's driving the timetable for war is not diplomacy but military readiness," energy-sector consultant Roger Diwan told Reuters News Agency. "If the U.S. needs more time to get the military in place, it will use that time to seek diplomatic backing, but whether it gets that backing or not, we still expect war to start some time between the middle of February and early March." I think it's always been driven by military needs. Key dates in the runup to war on Saddam Hussein's Iraq. -* Jan. 29: The United Nations Security Council convenes to discuss the newest assessment of its weapons-inspection team. -* Jan. 31: U.S. President George W. Bush meets British Prime Minister Tony Blair in what has been dubbed a council of war. -* Feb. 5: Colin Powell presents evidence on Iraq to the United Nations Security Council. -* Feb. 14: Chief weapon inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei deliver their next inspections report. -* Feb. 15: The Eid al-Adha Muslim festival ends. -* March: Mideast winter ends. Temperature averages 22C with only about four days of rain, making good conditions for ground forces. -* April: Summer begins. Temperatures continue to rise with near-ideal conditions for troops. By mid-June, temperatures often surpass 40C. No rain expected. My prediction: The 5 Feb presentation by Colin Powell will be the key to the UN's survival. We're going to attack, with or without them. Attack looks likely any time after Feb 15th. February 16th is the full moon, if those people who say we would want no moon to optimise stealth are right, the next new moon is 3 March. |
Link |