Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Home Front: Politix
Dems tussle over adding ‘occupation’ to party platform
2016-06-12
Sharpening differences as the parties evolve to new configurations.
[IsraelTimes] As Clinton secures victory, Democratic National Committee debates how to describe Israel’s presence in West Bank

The Democratic Party’s platform drafting committee tussled over whether to use the word "occupation" in addressing the Israeli-Paleostinian issue, reflecting divisions between the Bernie Sanders
...The only openly Socialist member of the U.S. Senate. Sanders was Representative-for-Life from Vermont until moving to the Senate for the rest of his life in 2006, assuming the seat vacated by Jim Jeffords...
and Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as the Smartest Woman in the World and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Jeremiah S. Black ...
camps that could play out at the convention.

The Democratic National Committee held two days of open hearings this week in Washington, D.C., on the platform, inviting experts to testify. The hearings, which will also take place in other cities, got underway the same week that it became clear that Clinton had secured her position as the party’s presumptive presidential nominee.

Much of the back and forth Thursday afternoon, when the committee considered foreign policy, was about whether the committee should describe Israel’s presence in the West Bank as an "occupation."

The drafting committee’s platform will be presented to the full committee during the convention in late July in Philadelphia. Party officials are eager not to repeat the scene in 2012, when the full platform committee, under fire by pro-Israel groups for not including Jerusalem in the original draft, voted to add recognition of the city as Israel’s capital. The motion passed, but there was loud booing during the session.

Robert Wexler, a former Florida congressman who appeared before the committee as an expert witness representing Clinton’s views, in his interview after testifying said that while the platform could be tweaked, Clinton’s views ‐ which he said included not prejudging the outcome by referencing an "occupation" ‐ would prevail because she is the nominee.

"There was a winner of the Democratic primaries and her name is Hillary Clinton, and Hillary Clinton has a decades-long policy regarding Israel," he said.

Wexler in his testimony also said that the platform should reject bids to delegitimate Israel, including through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.
Link


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Abbas Says He'll Be Sensitive To 'Jewish Claims To Israel'
2012-09-27
[Jerusalem Post] Paleostinian Authority President the ineffectual Mahmoud Abbas
... a graduate of the prestigious unaccredited Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow with a doctorate in Holocaust Denial...
on Monday told Jewish leaders that his UN speech would address showing greater sensitivity to Jewish claims to Israel.
Whatever that means.
Meeting Monday evening with about 10 Jewish leaders, Abbas also endorsed Alan Dershowitz's formula for returning to talks with Israel, participants said.

The meeting was under the auspices of the Center for Middle East Peace. Top Jewish organizational leaders declined, reportedly at the request of the office of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who has discouraged Jewish meetings with Abbas until he gives up demanding a settlement freeze as a precondition for returning to talks.

Among those who did attend were Dershowitz, the Harvard legal scholar and a leading defender of Israel; Robert Wexler, the CMEP director and a top Jewish surrogate for President B.O.; and Peter Joseph, who heads the Israel Policy Forum.
Link


Fifth Column
Expose Of Obama Agents In Control Of Major Jewish Organizations
2011-07-05
Obama has taken an embarrassing uppercut from Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that has jolted him, and he is not one to forget. He is out not only for revenge but for victory. And that includes the demise of Israel. He has already set the stage for this. His hand-picked agents are in place in his corner. And they include the most powerful, influential individuals and groups.

AIPAC, the leading American pro-Israel lobby, is now run by Lee Rosenberg, a close Chicago buddy and top fundraiser for Obama.

The Anti-Defamation League, the largest Jewish-American defense organization, is headed by Abe Foxman, a loyal and lifelong Democrat who recently lauded Obama's speech in which he called for Israel to retreat to its 1948 borders, referred to by both former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier and Foreign Minister Abba Eban as "suicidal" and "Auschwitz" borders.

Billionaire George Soros, the former Jewish-Nazi, formed and funded J-Street, composed of Palestinian-supporting Jews to support Israel's enemies.

Obama also planted Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a committed J-Street leader, as head of the Democratic National Committee.

Former Congressman Robert Wexler, another J-Streeter who ran Obama's Florida campaign, now heads The Center For Middle East Peace, a well-funded, radical Jewish group that pushes Palestinian goals.

The all-powerful Jewish Reform Movement has just selected Rabbi Richard Jacobs as its head. He is an outspoken, rabid Obama and J-Street supporter.

Not to be outdone by other Jewish radical groups, The Jewish Council for Public Affairs is headed by Rabbi Steve Gutow, the founder of the National Jewish Democratic Council, which speaks for and to Democratic Jews.

Never heard of JCPA? It is the umbrella organization for groups including Hadassah, ADL, JWV, the JCCs, The American Jewish Committee and others. JCPA shares its officers with such radical Jewish groups as Americans For Peace Now and J-Street.

Obama and the radical element in the Jewish community have done their job of infiltrating and controlling the Jewish community. When Soros was outed by Glenn Beck as working for the Nazis during World War II in his native Hungary, his billions somehow convinced 400 rabbis to sign a letter condemning Beck in the Wall Street Journal for his accurate but embarrassing disclosures.

Sadly, rabbis in my own community in South Florida signed on to this ad. They are still delivering anesthetizing sermons to their worshipful, mindless congregations.

However, in Broward County, the Republican Party has just organized a Jewish outreach. Its formation has been careful and well-thought-out. The board has met and is preparing meetings to be held in the Century Villages, Wynmoor and other Democrat strongholds.

And they are finding an ally in the Zionist Organization in America, the most active and fearless Jewish pro-Israel/America group
Link


Home Front: Politix
FMR Congressman Wexler: Obama and Netanyahu actually agree
2011-05-22
rantburg exclusive
About noon today 5-20, former Congressman Robert Wexler (now Prez of the S. D. Abraham Middle East Center) gave a talk in Potomac praising Obama's 5-19 speech (and also saying nice things about Netanyahu.

Wexler said that Obama's phrase "the 1967 borders with mutually agreed swaps of land" is similar to the phrase Netanyahu used on 5-18 before the Knesset "we accept an independent Palentinian state in much of Judea and Samaria but not insofar as the Etzion and Ariel bloc".

Wexler also said that Obama's phrase "Israel as a Jewish State" is the same thing as saying "Palestianian refugees will be allowed in a future Palestinian state, not in Israel" (this latter phrase is in the 2004 letter from W to Sharon which was endorsed by both houses of Congress - Wexler takes partial credit for the endorsement).

The audience (Beth Sholom of Potomac) was somewhat skeptical but gave wexler a thank you.

Wexler's talking points are similar to those of other pro Israel Democrats - for example the op ed by Matthew Levitt in the NY Daily News which I have used as the 'source'.
Link


Home Front: Politix
In Florida, Wexler endorses Crist
2010-09-27
Former Democratic Rep. Robert Wexler (Fla.) on Saturday endorsed Independent Party candidate Charlie Crist in Florida's three-way contest for the Senate.

The office of Rep. Kendrick Meek (Fla.), the Democrat vying for the seat, was quick to downplay the news, with front man Adam Sharon telling the Orlando Sentinel that Wexler's decision was a "friendship endorsement, not a political endorsement."
Link


Home Front: WoT
Appeaser in Chief to balance support for Israel against other American interests
2010-04-15
It was just a phrase at the end of President Obama's news conference on Tuesday, but it was a stark reminder of a far-reaching shift in how the United States views the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and how aggressively it might push for a peace agreement.

When Mr. Obama declared that resolving the long-running Middle East dispute was a “vital national security interest of the United States,' he was highlighting a change that has resulted from a lengthy debate among his top officials over how best to balance support for Israel against other American interests.

This shift, described by administration officials who did not want to be quoted by name when discussing internal discussions, is driving the White House's urgency to help broker a Middle East peace deal. It increases the likelihood that Mr. Obama, frustrated by the inability of the Israelis and the Palestinians to come to terms, will offer his own proposed parameters for an eventual Palestinian state.

Mr. Obama said conflicts like the one in the Middle East ended up “costing us significantly in terms of both blood and treasure' — drawing an explicit link between the Israeli-Palestinian strife and the safety of American soldiers as they battle Islamic extremism and terrorism in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

Mr. Obama's words reverberated through diplomatic circles in large part because they echoed those of Gen. David H. Petraeus, the military commander overseeing America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In recent Congressional testimony, the general said that the lack of progress in the Middle East created a hostile environment for the United States. He has denied reports that he was suggesting that soldiers were being put in harm's way by American support for Israel.

But the impasse in negotiations “does create an environment,' he said Tuesday in a speech in Washington. “It does contribute, if you will, to the overall environment within which we operate.'
It's an excuse. Nothing else. To be replaced by another excuse shortly after the ink from any agreement were to dry.
The glimmers of daylight between United States and Israeli interests began during President George W. Bush's administration, when the United States became mired in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Three years ago, Condoleezza Rice, then secretary of state, declared during a speech in Jerusalem that a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians was a “strategic interest' of the United States. In comments that drew little notice at the time, she said, “The prolonged experience of deprivation and humiliation can radicalize even normal people.'

But President Bush shied away from challenging Israeli governments.

The Obama administration's new thinking, and the tougher policies toward Israel that could flow from it, has alarmed American Jewish leaders accustomed to the Bush administration's steadfast support. They are not used to seeing issues like Jewish housing in the West Bank or East Jerusalem linked, even by implication, to the security of American soldiers. Some fret that it raises questions about the centrality of the American alliance with Israel, which the administration flatly denies.

“In the past, the problem of who drinks out of whose well in Nablus has not been a strategic interest of the United States,' said Martin S. Indyk, a former United States ambassador to Israel and the vice president and the director of foreign policy at the Brookings Institution. He said there was an interest now because of the tens of thousands of troops fighting Islamist insurgencies abroad at the same time that the United States was trying to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions.

“Will resolving the Palestinian issue solve everything?' Mr. Indyk said. “No. But will it help us get there? Yes.'
Not.
The administration's immediate priority, officials said, is jump-starting indirect talks between Israelis and Palestinians. There is still a vigorous debate inside the administration about what to do if such talks were to go nowhere, which experts said is the likeliest result, given the history of such negotiations. Some officials, like Gen. James L. Jones, the national security adviser, advocate putting forward an American peace plan, while others, like the longtime Middle East peace negotiator Dennis B. Ross, who now works in the National Security Council, favor a more incremental approach.

Last week, National Security Council officials met with outside Middle East experts to discuss the Arab Israeli conflict. Two weeks before, General Jones and Mr. Obama met with several national security advisers from previous administrations and discussed putting forward an American proposal, even though it would put pressure on both Israel and the Palestinians.

Several officials point out that Mr. Obama has now seized control of Middle East policy himself, particularly since the controversy several weeks ago when Israeli authorities announced new Jewish housing units in Jerusalem during a visit to Israel by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Mr. Obama, incensed by that snub, has given Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a list of demands, and relations between the United States and Israel have fallen into a chilly standoff.

“The president is re-evaluating the tactics his administration is employing toward Israel and the entire Middle East,' said Robert Wexler, a former Democratic congressman who resigned in January to lead the Center for Middle East Peace, a Washington-based nonprofit institution that is working for a peace agreement.

“I don't think that anybody believes American lives are endangered or materially affected by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,' said Mr. Wexler, who has close ties to administration officials. “That's an oversimplification. However, you'd have to have blinders on not to recognize that there are issues in one arena that affect other arenas.'

For their part, administration officials insist that their support for Israel is unwavering. They point to intensive cooperation between the American and Israeli militaries, which they say has allowed Israel to retain a military edge over its neighbors.

The sense of urgency in Washington comes just as many Israelis have become disillusioned with the whole idea of resolving the conflict. Mr. Netanyahu's right-wing coalition government has long been skeptical about the benefits of a peace deal with the Palestinians. But skepticism has taken root in the Israeli public as well, particularly after Israel saw little benefit from its traumatic withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.

Among American Jewish groups, there is less skepticism than alarm about the administration's new direction. On Tuesday, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a powerful pro-Israel lobbying group, publicized letters to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, signed by 76 senators and 333 House members, that implored the administration to defuse tensions.

In an open letter to Mr. Obama from the World Jewish Congress, the organization's president, Ronald S. Lauder, asked, “Why does the thrust of this administration's Middle East rhetoric seem to blame Israel for the lack of movement on peace talks?'
Because the "Palestinians" are incorrigible? Because Bambi is planning on capitulating to Iran?
Mr. Lauder, who said the letter was scheduled to be published Thursday as an advertisement in The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, said he discussed the letter with Mr. Netanyahu and received his support before taking out the ad.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Only 155 Dem House Seats Are Safe
2010-01-23
Republican Scott Brown won 52%-47% in Massachusetts, which voted 62%-36% for Barack Obama in 2008. How did he do in each of Massachusetts's 10 congressional districts, all of which are represented by Democrats who have been reelected without much opposition this decade? Blogger Fred Bauer has attempted to calculate the results, omitting results in cities or towns which are split between congressional districts. Bauer shows Coakley winning 80%-20% in Michael Capuano's 8th district (which voted 84% for Obama), 54%-46% in Ed Markey's 7th district (65% Obama) and 51%-49% in John Olver's western Mass 1st district (64% Obama). He shows Coakley narrowly trailing in Barney Frank's 4th district (63% Obama), where I think the Fall River precincts he didn't count would have put Coakley narrowly ahead, and in Stephen Lynch's 9th district (60% Obama) he shows her well behind but doesn't include the Boston wards and precincts which may have put her ahead, although I rather doubt it.

Anyway, there's a pattern here: Coakley carries districts where Obama got 65% or more of the vote and runs essentially even in the district where he got 64%, and Scott Brown runs ahead in districts where Obama got less than 64% of the vote.

Let's extrapolate those numbers to the nation as a whole and assume that a district that voted 64% or more for Obama is safe for Democrats even under the most dire of circumstances. How many such districts are there? Answer, according to this source: 103. The other 332 districts voted 63% or less for Obama. Interestingly, there are more 64%+ Obama districts in the West (36) than in the East (27) and more in the South (21) than in the Midwest (19).

All but two of the 103 Obama 64%+ districts are represented by Democrats. The two exceptions are Louisiana 2, where Republican An Joseph Cao beat Democrat William “Cold Cash' Jefferson in a December 2008 runoff, and Florida 19, whose incumbent Robert Wexler resigned and a special election will be held in April. And, yes, it will be amazing if this heavily Jewish district in Palm Beach and Broward Counties elects a Republican; heavily Jewish Brookline and Newton voted heavily against Scott Brown in Massachusetts.

So that means that 101 of the 256 House Democrats represent 64%+ Obama districts and that 155 House Democrats represent districts which might, according to the Massachusetts metric, be vulnerable in some circumstances to Republican capture. No wonder so many House Democrats refused to vote for the Senate health care bill—enough to prompt Speaker Nancy Pelosi to say publicly that “unease would be a gentle word' to describe their attitude toward doing that.

Who represents the 103 Obama 64%+ districts? By my count, 36 are represented by members of the Congressional Black Caucus and 11 by members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus; three (CA 5, HI 2, LA 3) are represented by members of Asian descent) and 53 by members who are white. I have previously characterized 36 of these last 56 districts as “gentry liberal' districts and 12 as “working class/ethnic' districts.

Where are these 64%+ Obama districts? Here's a list by metro area:

EAST

New York (NY 6, NY 7, NY 8, NY 10, NY 11, NY 12, NY 14, NY 15, NY 16, NY 17, NJ 10, NJ 13)

Philadelphia (PA 1, PA 2, NJ 1)

Washington (MD 4, MD 5, MD 8, VA 8 [technically I count the last in the South)

Boston (MA 7, MA 8)

Baltimore (MD 7)

Pittsburgh (PA 14)

Buffalo (NY 28)

Hartford (CT 1)

Providence (RI 1)

Rural New England (MA 1, VT 1)

MIDWEST

Chicago (IL 1, IL 2, IL 3, IL 4, IL 5, IL 7, IL 9)

Detroit (MI 12, MI 13, MI 14, MI 15)

Cleveland (OH 11)

St. Louis (MO 1)

Minneapolis (MN 4, MN 5)

Milwaukee (WI 4)

Indianapolis (IN 7)

Flint (MI 5)

Madison (WI 2)

WEST

Los Angeles (CA 27, CA 28, CA 29, CA 30, CA 31, CA 32, CA 33, CA 34, CA 35, CA 36, CA 37, CA 38, CA 39, CA 43)

San Francisco (CA 6, CA 7, CA 8, CA 9, CA 10, CA 12, CA 13, CA 14, CA 15, CA 16)

California North and Central Coast (CA 1, CA 17, CA 23)

San Diego (CA 53)

Sacramento (CA 5)

Seattle (WA 7)

Portland (OR 3)

Denver (CO 1)

Phoenix (AZ 4)

Las Vegas (NV 1)

Honolulu (HI 1, HI 2)

SOUTH

Atlanta (GA 4, GA 5, GA 13)

Miami (FL 17, FL 19, FL 23)

Houston (TX 9, TX 18)

Dallas (TX 30)

San Antonio (TX 20)

El Paso (TX 16)

Tampa (FL 11)

Jacksonville (FL 3)

Birmingham (AL 7)

New Orleans (LA 2)

Jackson (MS 2)

Charlotte (NC 12)

Columbia (SC 6)

Memphis (TN 9)

Richmond (VA 3)
Link


Home Front: Politix
Wexler backs Deutch as successor
2009-10-26
Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) on Sunday backed state Sen. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) to replace him in the House of Representatives after he steps down in January.

Wexler resigned just over two weeks ago to head the Center for Middle East Peace and Economic Cooperation, a Washington think-tank.

"I want to especially thank Congressman Robert Wexler, who has done such an extraordinary job representing the people of the 19th Congressional District over the last thirteen years,' Deutch said in a release. "Every day in Congress, he fights for the seniors and families of Palm Beach and Broward Counties. His support and commitment to Israel is one that I will passionately continue. His commitment to the people is a model for how I want to serve in Congress."

Deutch also received the backing of Florida Democratic Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Alcee Hastings and Ron Klein, all of whom represent South Florida.

Gov. Charlie Crist (R-Fla.) has yet to set a date for the special election to replace Wexler. Former Broward County Commissioner Ben Graber is the only other Democratic candidate to officially announce. Businessman Ed Lynch (R) is the only Republican running in the heavily Democratic district.
Link


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
"I want to call their bluff" but you ante up - Rep. Wexler (D)
2009-07-02
One of President Barack Obama's earliest backers, US Representative Robert Wexler, was in Jerusalem this week trying to persuade Israelis that a settlement freeze would be a win-win proposition.

Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Florida). "I want to call their bluff," Wexler told The Jerusalem Post, referring to the Arab countries.

"I want to see, if Israel makes substantial movement toward a credible peace process, whether they are willing to do it. And if they are not, better that we should find out five or six months into the process, before Israel is actually asked to compromise any significant position."

Wexler added: "And if the Arab world fails to deliver, you can rightly say that all bets are off." Betting with someone elses lives. Some might call this meddling.

The Democrat from south Florida told the Post that the Obama administration was placing America's Arab allies under heavy pressure to take substantial steps toward normalizing relations with Israel, in return for a settlement freeze. He said they were being lobbied to establish trade offices, economic links, and cultural and educational exchanges; and to permit Israeli airliners to traverse Arab airspace.

Wexler added that the US was "open to suggestions from the Israeli side" for "different indicators of normalization that would… create credibility among the Israeli public."

IT IS notable that otherwise savvy Israeli and Western politicians have found themselves repeatedly out-maneuvered in attempting to "call the bluff" of their Arab interlocutors. The assumption is that if their ostensible demands are met, the Arabs will be painted into a corner and have no choice but to be accommodating.

Ehud Barak thought he had called Yasser Arafat's bluff at Camp David in 2000, offering roughly 90 percent of the West Bank, all of the Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem. Arafat said it wasn't enough - and launched the second intifada.

In 2005, Ariel Sharon unilaterally uprooted all Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and pulled the Israeli army out totally. He told the Palestinians: "To an outstretched hand, we shall respond with an olive branch." They replied with an onslaught of Kassam rockets against the Negev.

Rest of his useless, synchophatic drivel at the link.
Link


Home Front: Politix
McCain Ad: My Vice President can beat up your President!
2008-09-03
Personally, I think this is one of the big reasons McCain picked Palin, aside from the fact that she is d@mned good! After people make the connection that Palin is at least as equally qualifed as BO [because she actually votes something other than "Present" and has done more in her shorter time in office], they will then begin to recognize how much more qualified McCain is than both Palin and, resultingly, BO. Also, the only measure I am using to compare qualifications between BO and Palin is time, and I am not even considering the fact that BO is a socialist, which is exactly in the wrong direction. That will come out eventually too, I hope.

Mounting a ferocious defense of his embattled running mate, John McCain said he is buying a TV ad arguing that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has more experience than the Democratic presidential nominee, Barack Obama.

In an effort to rev up conservatives, a campaign statement issued a list of critical media mentions that it called “smears” of Palin, who speaks in primetime at the convention on Wednesday night.

The campaign announced: “The McCain campaign will launch a television ad directly comparing Gov. Palin’s executive experience as a governor who oversees 24,000 state employees, 14 statewide cabinet agencies and a $ 10 billion budget to Barack Obama’s experience as a one-term junior senator from Illinois.”

The ad is what the campaign calls “a forward-leaning effort to counter the shameless smears that have prevailed during Gov. Palin’s introduction to the American voter.”

Senior adviser Steve Schmidt gave Politico a statement saying the campaign will have no more comment about the vetting process, which was the subject of more critical coverage in Wednesday morning’s papers:

“Gov. Sarah Palin is an exceptional governor with a record of accomplishment that exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Sen. Obama. Her selection came after a six-month long rigorous vetting process where her extraordinary credentials and exceptionalism became clear. This vetting controversy is a faux media scandal designed to destroy the first female Republican nominee for vice president of the United States who has never been a part of the old boys' network that has come to dominate the news establishment in this country. Sen. McCain picked his governing partner after a long and thorough search. Gov. Palin looks forward to addressing the nation and laying out the fundamental choice this election represents for the American people.

"The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. It is time to begin the debate about how to win the two wars this country is engaged in,how to make this country energy independent and how to create jobs for American families that are hurting. The American people get to do the vetting now on Election Day — Nov. 4."

Here is a document the McCain campaign sent to reporters this morning:

MCCAIN ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR TODAY:

• Mayor Rudy Giuliani will be on all three network and cable television stations defending Gov. Palin’s family and her historic candidacy.

• The McCain campaign will launch a television ad directly comparing Gov. Palin’s executive experience as a governor who oversees 24,000 state employees, 14 statewide cabinet agencies and a $10 billion budget to Barack Obama’s experience as a one-term junior senator from Illinois.

• Former Democratic vice presidential nominee and current U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman and Congressman Eric Cantor will hold a press conference calling on Barack Obama to condemn and/or dismiss his official campaign spokesman who implied Gov. Sarah Palin supported Nazi sympathy because she wore a Pat Buchanan pin on one single occasion.

• McCain-Palin surrogates Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, Former HP CEO Carly Fiorina, U.S. Rep. Heather Wilson, former Ebay CEO Meg Whitman, McCain senior adviser Nicolle Wallace, McCain communications director Jill Hazelbaker and McCain senior adviser Nancy Pfotenhauer will do television and radio interviews to demand better treatment for Gov. Palin’s family.

REPORTED FALSEHOODS AND SMEARS AGAINST GOV. PALIN’S FAMILY AND HISTORIC CANDIDACY:

• Liberal Bloggers Questioned Whether Gov. Palin's Fifth Child Was Actually Bristol Palin's Child.

"'Where has Bristol Palin (far right, holding Trig, with a ring on her wedding finger) been for the past year? Has she been attending high school? Or was she absent because of infectious mononucleosis for between five and eight months, as is now being reported on the Internet? Why would a 43-year-old woman, on her fifth pregnancy, with a Down syndrome child, after her amniotic fluid has started to leak, not go to the nearest hospital immediately, even if she was in Texas for a speech? Why would she not only not go to the hospital in Texas, but take an eight-hour plane flight to Seattle and then Anchorage? Why would she choose to deliver the baby not in the nearest major facility in Anchorage but at a much smaller hospital near her home town? Why did the flight attendants on the trip home say she bore no signs of being pregnant?' It strikes me as likely that there are reasonable answers to these questions — more reasonable than the only one given so far" (Andrew Sullivan, "Things That Make You Go Hmmm," The Atlantic's "The Daily Dish" Blog, Posted 8/31/08)

• CNN's John Roberts Questioned Whether Governor Palin Would Be Able To Care For A Child With Down Syndrome As Vice President.

CNN's JOHN ROBERTS: "There's also this issue that on April 18, she gave birth to a baby with Down syndrome. The baby is just slightly more than 4 months old now. Children with Down Syndrome require an awful lot of attention. The role of vice president, it seems to me, would take up an awful lot of her time, and it raises the issue of, how much time will she have to dedicate to her newborn child?" BASH: "That's a very good question, and I guess my guess is that perhaps the line inside the McCain campaign would be, if it were a man being picked who also had a baby 4 months ago with Down syndrome, would you ask the same question? And that might be another way to kind of, you know, close the gender gap in trying to make the point that, yes, she not only has unfortunately a baby with Down syndrome, but she has five children, the oldest of whom is apparently in the Army and is apparently going to head off to Iraq in the fall." (CNN's "Newsroom," 8/29/08)

• The Washington Post's Sally Quinn Questioned Whether A Woman With Five Children And One Having Down Syndrome Would Be Able To Make Her Family A Priority If She Were Vice President.

SALLY QUINN: "And I do think, too, that you have to weigh the situation. It's one thing to have one or two or three children, especially if they are healthy children. And everyone knows that women and men are different and that moms and dads are different and that women — the burden of child care almost always falls on the woman. But I think, when you have five children, one a 4-month-old Down syndrome baby, and a daughter who is 17, who is also a child and who is going to need her mother very much in the next few months and years with her own baby coming, that I don't see how you cannot make your family your first priority. And I think if you are going to be president of the United States, which she may well be, I think that's going to be a real stretch for her." (CNN's "Newsroom," 9/2/08)

• On MSNBC, Headlines Beneath The Live Coverage Included "SOME WORKING MOTHERS WORRY THAT PALIN IS TAKING ON TOO MUCH" And "SOME VOTERS CONCERNED IF PALIN, A MOTHER OF FIVE, HAS TIME TO BE VP."

"Two recent headlines underneath the talking heads at MSNBC: 'SOME WORKING MOTHERS WORRY THAT PALIN IS TAKING ON TOO MUCH.' Moments later, it changed to, 'SOME VOTERS CONCERNED IF PALIN, A MOTHER OF FIVE HAS TIME TO BE VP.' So good of them to express the concern in headline form." ("MSNBC Worries About Sarah Palin's Time Management," National Review's "Campaign Spot" Blog, Posted 9/2/08)

• Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) Said That Gov. Palin Was A Supporter Of Pat Buchanan Who He Called A "Nazi Sympathizer."

"Here's Rep. Robert Wexler of Florida: John McCain's decision to select a vice presidential running mate that endorsed Pat Buchanan for president in 2000 is a direct affront to all Jewish Americans. Pat Buchanan is a Nazi sympathizer with a uniquely atrocious record on Israel, even going as far as to denounce bringing former Nazi soldiers to justice and praising Adolf Hilter for his 'great courage.'" (Ben Smith, "Palin On Israel," Politico, Posted 8/29/08)

• The Obama Campaign Linked Gov. Palin As A Supporter Of Pat Buchanan Who They Called A "Nazi Sympathizer."

"'Palin was a supporter of [MSNBC analyst] Pat Buchanan, a right-winger or as many Jews call him: a Nazi sympathizer,' Obama spokesman Mark Bubriski wrote in an e-mail." (Marc Caputo, "Obama Camp Connects The Dots For Jews: McCain ... Palin ... Buchanan ... Nazis," The Miami Herald's "Naked Politics" Blog, Posted 8/30/08)

• James Carville Claimed That Because Gove. Palin Was A Supporter Of Pat Buchanan She Would Not Be Attractive To Democrats.

CARVILLE: "Again, when they find out, when they find out — I man, when people find out that Sarah Palin supported Pat Buchanan, that she supports teaching creationism, they're not — she's not a person that's going to be very attractive to Democrats." (CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees," 8/29/08)

• James Carville Said That Gov. Palin Would Appeal To "Pat Buchanan Kind Of Republicans."

CARVILLE: "I think, among social conservatives, she's going to be fine. She endorsed Pat Buchanan for president in 2000. And he's a hero to social conservatives. She's for teaching creationism in the public schools in Alaska, something that is sort of No. 1 on the social conservative agenda. So, yes, I think, to the kind of Pat Buchanan kind of Republicans, she's going to have some appeal." (CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees," 8/29/08)

• In Toledo, Ohio, Sen. Joe Biden Said One Of The Differences Between Him And Gov. Palin Was "She's Good-Looking."

"In his introduction of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., just now on the rooftop of the Toldeo Public Library, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., commented on the pulchritude of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Sen. John McCain's newly-named running mate. … 'From our perspective the whole deal is how does the government help you get back up without getting in the way?' Biden asked. 'There's a gigantic — gigantic — difference between John McCain and Barack Obama, and between me and I suspect my vice presidential opponent. And that is that — ' The crowd laughed. 'Well there's obvious differences,' Biden said, beginning to ham it up. 'She's good-looking,' he said, laughing. 'You know there's obvious differences. But there's a whole lot — '" (Jake Tapper and Matt Jaffe, "Oh, That Joe! (Number 4 in a Series) — Biden on Difference Between Him And Palin: 'She's Good Looking'," ABC News' "Political Punch" Blog, Posted 8/31/08)

• CNN's James Carville Said That Gov. Palin Is "Almost Absent Qualifications For The Job."

JAMES CARVILLE: "I just would make the point, is my family — I had five sisters. They're all pro-life to the core. And they all would act in exactly the same way. That's not the question. The question is, why would she be running for vice president? I mean this woman is almost absent qualifications for the job. I mean this is — she is — I'm willing to concede to the whole world that she's a very committed pro-life person, that she's an honorable person, that she's a good mother. But that's not the issue before the American people right now." (CNN's "Larry King Live," 9/1/08)

• Liberal Radio Host Ed Schultz Said That Gov. Palin Was An "Empty Pantsuit" Who Had Started A "Bimbo Alert."

"Liberal radio host Ed Schultz was telling listeners Monday that Palin was an 'empty pantsuit' who had set off a 'bimbo alert.'" (Howard Kurtz, "A Blogger, A Baby, A Cry Of Concern," The Washington Post, 9/2/08)

• Sherrod Brown Criticized Gov. Palin For Being Mayor Of A Small Town.

"U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown urged the pro-Democratic crowd at the Cincinnati AFL-CIO Council’s annual Labor Day Picnic today not to be shy about promoting the Barack Obama-Joe Biden presidential ticket in their personal sphere of contacts. … 'She’s been mayor of a city half the size of Blue Ash and governor of a state with half the population of Hamilton County,' Brown said. 'John McCain failed in his first big decision as a potential president. He chose somebody with no experience to be a heartbeat away from being the U.S. president.'" (Steve Kemme, "At Picnic, Brown Slams Palin," Cincinnati Enquirer, 9/2/08)

• ABC's Jake Tapper Reported That Gov. Palin Was Once A Member Of The Alaskan Independence Party, Which Wanted To Secede From The United States.

"The campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., likes to herald the independence of its new running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which, since the 1970s, has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States." (Jake Tapper, "Members Of 'Fringe' Alaskan Independence Party Say Palin Was A Member In 90s," ABC's "Political Punch" Blog, Posted 9/1/08)

• The Washington Post's Richard Cohen Said That Gov. Palin Was A "Sitcom" Candidate And Would Be A "Disaster Movie" If She Became President.

"One of the great sights of American political life — a YouTube moment if ever there was one — was to see the doughboy face of Newt Gingrich as he extolled the virtues of Sarah Palin, a sitcom of a vice presidential choice and a disaster movie if she moves up to the presidency." (Richard Cohen, op-ed, "Republicans Rush In," The Washington Post, 9/2/08)

• Tom Daschle Attacked Palin As Having “Absolutely No Experience” And Being “Extreme Right Wing.”

Daschle: “Three questions: With absolutely no experience, are we ready, if necessary, to place our future in her hands as commander in chief and our premier negotiator with other world leaders? Are we comfortable in having a VP who represents the extreme right wing, including the advocacy of creationism and a denial of any human responsibility in climate change? What happens if Gov. Palin is found to have abused her office in the firing of a police officer?” (“Politico Arena — Palin Edition,” The Politico, 8/31/08)
Link


Home Front: Politix
Kucinich Gets His Day to Air Impeachment Article
2008-07-26
I represent the Lollipop Guild, the Lollipop Guild, the Lollipop Guild...
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Dennis Kucinich's quest to impeach President Bush is got an unofficial airing in the House Judiciary Committee on Friday. The Ohio congressman's single impeachment article is not expected to move forward, but critics of the Bush administration were taking the opportunity in a House Judiciary Committee hearing to push for removing the president from office.
Ah. A dog and pony show. Oh, well. They're good at that. That's about all they're good at...
Kucinich got a rock star welcome of whistles, hoots and clapping as he walked into the hearing room, holding hands with his wife, from hundreds of anti-war, anti-Bush people crammed into the room and lining the hallways outside. T-shirts reading "Arrest Bush" and "Veterans for Impeachment" illustrated the sentiments of many.
Hey, everybody! Look at meeeeeeeeeeeeee!
"The decision before us is whether to demand accountability for one of the gravest injustices imaginable," Kucinich testified, avoiding use of the "I" word.
Tape running on this?
Yes, sir, Mr Cheney.
Goooood. If it passes, I wanna be ready...

The committee reminded lawmakers and those testifying that House rules prohibit "personal abuse, innuendo or ridicule of the president." The House Rules and Manual points out that suggestions of mendacity, or accusations of hypocrisy, demagoguery or deception were out of order.
Man, I'll bet that pisses them off.
Didn't leave much to talk about, did it ...
"The rules of the House prevent me or any witness from utilizing familiar terms," Kucinich said. "But we can put two and two together in our minds."
Yeah, yeah, yeah...Bush equals Hitler. Could ya get on with it? It's Friday...
Later, former Los Angeles County Prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi, known for his prosecution of Charles Manson in 1970, acknowledged that "I am forbidden from accusing him of a crime, or even any dishonorable conduct" under House rules. But he could still encourage people to read his book, "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder."
When did Bugliosi become a nutjob?
Despite several mentions early of the "I" word elsewyer, committee chairman Rep. John Conyers explained to the audience it was not, technically, an impeachment hearing "to the regret of many."
Ah, another of the usual suspects.
He said the House would have to vote for an impeachment inquiry to begin, a test not met by the July 15 vote to send Kucinich's impeachment resolution to the Judiciary Committee.
Harrrumph harrumph harrrumph...
The hearing began shortly after 10 a.m. ET, and it didn't take long for the call to impeach Bush to bring an applause line, if not to wade through political statements on each side of the aisle. Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., said the administration has committed "serious abuses, that if proven, would certainly constitute high crimes." Therefore, "The most appropriate response to this unprecedented behavior is to hold hearings for impeachment."
And another usual suspect rears his head...
The line drew hoots of approval from some members of the audience, which drew a warning to the audience from Conyers, D-Mich.
Get the rope!
"Let's restrain ourselves, please," Conyers said.
Get the rope!
That's better.

Just after he spoke, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., made her thoughts known: "It is my judgment that President Bush is the worst president that our country has suffered."
And that makes me ever so sad. He's a big meanie! That's what he is!
The top-ranked Republican on the committee, Lamar Smith of Texas, dismissed the hearing as a waste of time. Likening the hearing to "an anger management class," Smith said, "Nothing is going to come out of this hearing with regard to impeachment. ... That's because there is no evidence to support impeachment."
Wait'll Barack takes over. They're making a list. You just made it...
He said the partisan tone of the hearing was probably one of the reasons congressional approval ratings are at historic lows, recently below 10 percent. "That makes President Bush's approval rating of 32 percent look pretty good," Smith said.
You might think they'd figure that out on their own, wouldn't ya?
Cracking a joke at his Democratic colleagues' expense, Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Calif., belittled the hearing, saying, "Maybe what we're here for is impeachment light' " -- a "never, never land" where Democrats lay out their accusations, but don't follow up on impeachment.
Now, now. Let's not make fun of Mr. Kucinich's district...
Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., tried to argue against the point of the hearing on a legal point."The framers (of the Constitution) did not intend impeachment as a political device," Pence said, adding that he believed the president has "consistently put the American people's need before his own."
You just made the list too, Buster!
It took the committee more than an hour to get to Kucinich, the first witness.
Would you like a booster seat, Mr. Kucinich?
But the fact that the hearing took place was almost as improbable as the intended outcome of Kucinich's wishes -- the ouster of the president. Under the Constitution, impeachment powers lie in the House. But despite deep divisions between the House Democratic Caucus and White House on a broad swath of issues -- the Iraq war, the economy, energy, climate change, to name a few -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has pointedly said impeachment is off the table.
But if I get a chance to make Bush look bad, ah, why not? Besides, it'll keep that creepy little bastard Kucinich away from me for awhile.
The hearing Friday, titled "Executive Power and Its Constitutional Limitations," followed the July 15 vote to send Kucinich's impeachment resolution to the panel.
Will the witness state his name, please.
Well, actually, I'm channeling the ghost of Saddam Hussein, so should I, like, give you his name or mine?

The witness panel that is loaded with people from the foundations of the anti-Bush movement. Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., for instance, earlier this month repeated his long-held belief that the administration invaded Iraq solely to secure oil and benefit oil companies. "That is why this administration let Usama bin Laden go because they wanted to justify attacking Iraq," Hinchey said, according to The (Kingston, N.Y.) Daily Freeman.
Damn! It was about the oiiiiil! How could I have missed that!
Another witness scheduled for Friday, Reagan administration lawyer turned Bush-basher Bruce Fein, met with reporters alongside antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan on Thursday, ahead of the hearing. According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Fein accused Bush of making a power-grab on the presidency, but also took on Democrats for letting him do it. "It doesn't matter if the country goes to hell in a hand basket as long as Democrats are steering the Titanic when it sinks," Fein said according to the paper.
Sounds like The Gang's All Here. Ward Churchill busy this week?
The list also included Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., an Iraq war critic; Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C.; former Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman, D-N.Y.; former Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., now the Libertarian Paty presidential candidate; Ross "Rocky" Anderson, founder of High Roads for Human Rights and former mayor of Salt Lake City. The other witnesses are: Stephen Presser, of the Northwestern University School of Law; Jeremy Rabkin, George Mason University School of Law; Elliot Adams, board president of Veterans for Peace; and Frederick A. O. Schwarz Jr., of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law.
Ooooooooh! Oooooooh! Me too! Me too! Pick me! Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeze!
Link


Home Front: Politix
Dean committed to seating Florida's delegates
2008-04-03
  • Howard Dean: Democrats will do everything in power to seat delegates
  • Rep. Robert Wexler says it's up to candidates to make a deal on Florida
  • Sen. Hillary Clinton promotes plan to keep jobs in U.S.
  • Sen. Barack Obama picks up endorsement from former Rep. Lee Hamilton
  • Link



    Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
    -12 More