Home Front: Politix | |
'All it does is just complicate everything,' Trump complained. 'FEMA has not done their job for the last four years.' | |
2025-01-23 | |
Trump spent portions of the interview expressing dismay over Biden's decision to issue preemptive pardons to some of the Democrat's family members and some of the Republican president's political enemies. As their time came to a close, the Fox News host told Trump 'let me get to the economy' and 'I'm running out of time.' 'I don't care,' the new president responded. He then turned back to bashing Biden's decision-making skills, including the ex-president's decision not to pardon himself. 'This is more important because right now the economy is going to do great. I'm here, so the economy - but you have to understand, he had bad advisers on almost everything,' Trump said of Biden. Hannity interjected saying he was being yelled at for time - but Trump kept going. 'It's like in the old days when the secretary of State said he never made a correct decision on foreign policy,' Trump said, meaning to quote a former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. Over the course of Hannity's hour-long program, Trump also hinted at another government agency he wanted to scrap and revealed the latest on the JFK assassination files. But the issue of pardons was front-and-center. In a clip shared earlier Wednesday by Fox, Trump is heard giving a cryptic warning about Biden making a mistake in not pardoning himself. Trump repeated that point several times during the full interview with Hannity. 'The precedent that he set on pardons is amazing. That's a much bigger story but people don't like talking about it. He pardoned everybody,' Trump said. 'But he didn't pardon himself.' 'Remember this, those people that he pardoned are now mandated, because they got a pardon, to testify and they can't take the Fifth,' Trump claimed. Hannity asked Trump if he would like to see Congress investigate Biden's pardons. House Speaker Mike Johnson already expressed openness to that. 'I think we'll let Congress decide,' Trump said. When talking about disaster relief, Trump suggested that he'd be open to killing FEMA - the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 'All it does is just complicate everything,' he complained. 'FEMA has not done their job for the last four years.' 'Unless you have certain types of leadership, it gets in the way. And FEMA is going to be a whole big discussion very shortly because I'd rather see the states take care of their own problems,' Trump said. He then spoke glowingly of Oklahoma's 'very competent' disaster response - and how the state voted for him in the last election. | |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Liveblog: Four New Trump Cabinet Nominees Face Off Against Senators at Confirmation Hearings |
2025-01-16 |
[PJMedia] Today we have Scott Turner (HUD), Scott Bessent (Treasury), Lee Zeldin (EPA), and Doug "Eyebrows" Burgum (Interior). The hearings started at 10:00 a.m. ET. Townhall is liveblogging here. 10 minutes ago Matt Vespa This is the end of the Bessent hearing. an hour ago Mia Cathell And that's a wrap on Zeldin's confirmation hearing. Some standout moments: Related: Confirmation hearings: 2017-01-11 Chuck Schumer trolls Mitch McConnell with copy of his own letter Confirmation hearings: 2006-11-09 Robert Gates and the "New Approach" Confirmation hearings: 2006-05-06 General Hayden eyed to succeed Goss as CIA director Related: Scott Turner 11/24/2024 Politics round-up: President-elect Trump and Congressional Republicans flooding the zone Scott Turner 11/23/2024 Trump names hedge fund manager Scott Bessent as his nominee to head US Treasury, and 8 more proposals Related: Scott Bessent 12/18/2024 Hollywood LGBTQ Elites Panicking over Second Trump Administration, Some Planning to Flee Scott Bessent 12/07/2024 How Democrats ''debanked'' political opponents in shocking attack on American freedoms Scott Bessent 11/25/2024 Janet Yellen exiting office, leaving mess behind for Trump team Related: Lee Zeldin 11/28/2024 Trump cabinet nominee says pipe bomb with ‘pro-Palestinian themed message’ left at his home Lee Zeldin 11/20/2024 US House Speaker Johnson Praises Trump's Cabinet Picks as 'Disruptors' to Shake Up Washington Lee Zeldin 11/17/2024 ‘YOU’RE HIRED’: Follow Along For Live Updates As Trump Builds His White House as of 11/16/2024 Related: Doug Burgum 11/22/2024 Trump Appointments Signal Aim To Boost US Energy Investment And Production Doug Burgum 11/17/2024 ‘YOU’RE HIRED’: Follow Along For Live Updates As Trump Builds His White House as of 11/16/2024 Doug Burgum 11/16/2024 Trump's transition team aims to kill Biden EV tax credit |
Link |
Government Corruption | |||
The Silent Insurrection: General Milley's Hand On January 6 | |||
2024-09-22 | |||
These Democrats grew anxious as over 140 House Republicans planned to contest the election results during the electoral college certification that day. Milley was then deeply engaged with a circle of confidants including
At a House Oversight Committee hearing in April addressing the 3-hour and 19-minute delay in mobilizing the D.C. National Guard on January 6, Colonel Earl Matthews, one of four Department of Defense witnesses, testified about an “irrational” fear among a “clique” of senior military officers concerning the potential misuse of the National Guard by the president. He indicated that these concerns were influenced behind the scenes by Milley, who often made disparaging remarks about the president and regularly referred to his fear of a so-called potential “Reichstag moment.” Meanwhile, Milley has insisted he maintained a posture of strict neutrality, vocally distancing his leadership of the military from the political turmoil surrounding the 2020 presidential election. "My job is to stay clean by ensuring that the uniformed military remains out of domestic politics," Milley stated during his testimony before the January 6 Select Committee. "The United States military has no role in domestic politics, period, full stop." Nevertheless, accounts of Milley’s approach to the unfolding situation during the late days of the Trump administration, as detailed in Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker's I Alone Can Fix It and Susan Glasser and Peter Baker’s August 2022 report in The New Yorker, present a picture of Milley that is much different from the disinterested persona he has disingenuously cultivated. Some excerpts follow: MILLEY’S COHORT OF CONFIDANTS I Alone Can Fix It highlights how Milley, as the joint session approached and more than 140 House Republicans were pledged to contest the election results, shared his anxiety with “senior leaders” in Congress who sought his “comfort” amid fears of “attempted coups.” The New Yorker’s August 2022 report further reveals Milley’s communications with key Democrats, specifically Pelosi and Schumer. Additionally, the New Yorker report describes Milley’s continued outreach to "Democrats close to Biden," which included “regular” interactions with Susan Rice, former Obama national security advisor. Known for her role in helping to orchestrate the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, Rice’s expertise in activities aimed at undermining the former president raises this question: What was it about her that made Milley want to seek her guidance in the days leading up to January 6? The report also references Robert Gates, former Secretary of Defense during both the Obama and Bush administrations, as another key figure in Milley’s circle of confidants. Gates reportedly advised Milley to remain in the Pentagon as long as possible, citing President Trump’s “increasingly erratic and dangerous behavior.” I Alone Can Fix It also depicts Gates as a mentor to Milley, urging him not to resign during the final months of the Trump administration. He’s quoted advising Milley, “Don’t quit. Steel your back. It’s not going to be easy, but you’re the right guy in the right place and at the right time.” LIZ CHENEY AND MILLEY’S “NIGHTMARE SCENARIOS” During Trump’s final months in office, the New Yorker report notes that Milley had two “nightmare scenarios” running through his mind: One was that Trump might spark an external crisis, such as a war with Iran, to divert attention or to create a pretext for a power grab at home, and the other was that Trump would manufacture a domestic crisis to justify ordering the military into the streets to prevent the transfer of power. On December 26, 2020, the two “nightmare scenarios” then preoccupying Milley transitioned from his personal concerns to the public domain in a column by Washington Post reporter David Ignatius—a journalist with close ties to both (you guessed it) the Obama and Bush administrations. Related: Mark Milley 09/11/2024 War at full strategic depth Mark Milley 08/27/2024 House GOP lets military off the hook for Afghanistan debacle Mark Milley 07/11/2024 The Three Phases of the Ukrainian War | |||
Link |
Government Corruption |
Network of current, former intel officials boosts leftist agendas, says ex-CIA agent |
2023-12-19 |
John Gentry, a veteran of both executive branch and congressional intelligence agencies and now an adjunct professor at Georgetown University, also warns that the politicization of the intelligence community, particularly the CIA, created a problem that threatens American security to this day. Created to be a strictly neutral service for both Republican and Democratic administrations, the politicization within the CIA first became an issue during the 1990s when CIA analyst Robert Gates ordered analysts to skew reports in favor of political narratives of elected officials, Mr. Gentry states in his book, "Neutering the CIA: Why U.S. Intelligence Versus Trump Has Long-Term Consequences." But what happened since 2016 has been far more serious and damaging to the agency’s role and mission, writes Mr. Gentry, a 12-year employee of the agency, including two years as a senior analyst on the staff of the National Intelligence Officer for Warning, who now teaches Missouri State University’s School of Defense and Strategic Studies. The author is also a retired Army Reserve officer who spent time with special operations and intelligence units. "A new, dramatically stronger and damaging form of politicization — partisan, political activism willing to damage or destroy politically a sitting American president — had taken root in parts of the U.S. intelligence community," Mr. Gentry writes. "It dwarfs the politicization episodes of the past in magnitude and importance, and it promises to have lasting, negative consequences." Mr. Gentry said his expose is not meant as a defense of Mr. Trump, who criticized intelligence agencies as a candidate and as president. The point of the book is to highlight how ideological opposition to Mr. Trump damaged the spy agencies themselves. A CIA spokesman declined to comment on the book and referred to remarks last summer by CIA Director William Burns. |
Link |
Government Corruption |
USA failed to cope with the role of a superpower |
2023-10-03 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Victoria Nikiforova [RIA] You always expect insights from former Western ministers. Immediately after resignation, their eyes open, they gladly throw off the shackles of political correctness and begin to cut the truth. Combined with professional insights, the result is an interesting read. Foreign Affairs magazine published an article by former US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, “The Dysfunctional Superpower.” This is quite panicky text. Despite all the author’s efforts, he shows how unstable the situation inside the United States is now and how high for them the price of any mistake in the foreign policy field is. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Is Democrats' Mr. Perfectly Fine a reelection disaster? |
2023-06-28 |
[THEHILL] When Democrats settled on Joe The Big GuyBiden ![]() as their candidate in 2020, they seemed to think he would be perfectly fine. He wasn’t completely crazy, he seemed moderate, he was happy enough to hide away in his basement to make the campaign all about President Trump, and he had enough experience in Washington to go along the established order that the nabobs of the capital city prefer. But like Taylor Swift pointed out in her 2008 hit song, sometimes Mr. Perfectly Fine turns out to be a disaster. Or as one friend of mine likes to put it, everything is fine until it is not fine. Biden has had some bad breaks in his life, and we should acknowledge the tragedy that he has had to endure up front. But when it comes to politics, Biden has been far luckier than good. He is prone to wide exaggerations about his own life experiences and has a penchant for at times stealing the words of another. He often says things that have no possibility of being true. Because voters seemingly grade on a curve, Biden’s gift for gab and Irish charm has carried him to a position of power that just about nobody saw in his future. That includes his former boss, President Obama, who talked him out of running in 2016 and who made clear to anybody who would listen that he didn’t think Biden was up to the job. Biden has a habit of making exactly the wrong decisions. On international issues, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said of Biden, "he has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades." From his vaccine mandates to his mask mandates, from his reckless spending plans that helped to spur inflation to his embrace of the defund the police crowd, from his doubling down on the climate change hysteria to his confusing rhetoric on Ukraine before the conflict started, Biden has consistently made bad situations immeasurably worse. Three things are now confronting Biden as he seeks reelection, outside his less than stellar performance. First, his age. Second, very real questions about how he got elected in the first place. Third, his corrupt business deals with his son, Hunter. Biden’s geriatric bearing has long concerned voters, and it frequently is one of most cited reasons why voters voice discomfort with his reelection. He was old when he ran for vice president. He will be the oldest president by close to a decade should he win reelection and serve out his second term. And despite the aviator sunglasses and cool sports car, Biden is not a young old man. The voters notice and they don’t like it. The latest revelations that people inside the intelligence community put their hands on the scale to tip the election in Biden’s favor makes his election appear to be illegitimate in the eyes of many voters. Did the CIA and FBI pressure Big Tech to suppress stories that would have hurt Biden in the closing stretch of the 2020 campaign? Should we take the allegations of whistleblowers seriously when they say that the Bidens are not playing by the same sort of rules as everybody else? And at what point can we just ignore how Joe Biden got so wealthy mostly on a government salary? How come so many of the roads to Hunter Biden’s wealth lead to hotspots like China and Ukraine? The Democrats can pretend all they want that Mr. Perfectly Fine is going to walk into the nomination and easily dispatch either Trump or Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. But just remember: Everything is fine until it’s not fine. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Delusional Joe Biden takes victory lapse |
2023-02-26 |
[NY Post] To mark the anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, President Biden made a surprising visit to Kyiv, where he promised continued American aid and international support. There, and in a second stop in Poland, his speeches sounded like declarations of victory. "President Putin is confronted with something today that he didn’t think was possible a year ago," Biden said in Warsaw. "The democracies of the world have grown stronger, not weaker. But the autocrats of the world have grown weaker, not stronger." Even allowing for Ukraine’s remarkable tenacity, the assertion of large geopolitical gains for the West is premature at best. The war in Ukraine is far from won, and claiming victory at halftime is a fool’s errand. In fact, the second year is already shaping up as far more complicated than the first. Iran is expanding its drone supply to Russia and China aims to play a bigger role, with President Xi Jinping planning to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. More alarming, China might supply Russia with arms, creating a new axis of evil that could spark a world war. Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin is preparing to launch a new, larger offensive within weeks. Despite these developments, Washington acts as if nothing has changed. It continues to drag its feet in helping Ukraine match Putin’s weaponry even as most of NATO has pulled its usual disappearing act. Although the US has committed a staggering $113 billion to the war without serious auditing of where the non-military aid goes, it is still slow-walking military equipment Ukraine says it needs. The pattern is that first, the administration says no to a request, then weeks or months later says yes, and weeks or months after that, makes a delivery. TWO-YEAR WAIT The habit is reaching new levels of absurdity over Zelensky’s push for Abrams tanks. The White House agreed to the request on Jan. 25, according to The Wall Street Journal editorial page, but now says it might take up to two years for the 31 tanks to make it to the front lines. In wartime, two years means never. Zelensky’s push for fighter jets is still in the "no" stage, so presumably, he will get those sometime after he gets the tanks. The possibility that China will compound Russia’s offensive power should be a wake-up call to Washington. Instead, officials comfort themselves by repeating wishful talking points. The always-unimpressive Jake Sullivan, Biden’s National Security Adviser, declared on CNN last week that "Russia has already lost the war" and sneered at a larger China role by insisting, without evidence, that many Chinese officials already find it "difficult to deal with" Russia’s assault on Ukrainian civilians. "They’re just trying to get through," he said of the Chinese officials, "they’re trying to find a way in a very awkward space to not oppose Russia but to not fully support them either." Samantha Power, head of the US Agency for International Development, echoed Sullivan’s view of a reluctant China, saying: "What Russia is doing is bringing them into circumstances that I think fundamentally are not in their economic interests, not in their — the interests of, again, expanding their standing" in the world. Both hailed the impact of sanctions on Russia’s economy until anchor Fareed Zakaria reminded them of estimates "that the Russian economy is actually going to do better this year than the British economy or the German economy." The Biden team’s happy talk strikes me as a dated, self-serving view of Chinese motives and goals. It’s as if the officials are talking about the China of 25 years ago when it was emerging as a modern power. But what if they are totally misreading the communist regime’s agenda now? What if China is using the war and America’s involvement to make a move toward its goal of global dominance? Count historian Niall Ferguson among those who believe the US is missing the big picture. Speaking on Dan Senor’s podcast, "Call Me Back," Ferguson expressed fears that Chinese leaders "are on a path to war and we don’t yet realize that. We still think this is just about speeches at Davos and sending Secretary of State Blinken to Beijing." BALLOON BOY He cited the spy balloon that crisscrossed America as a "classic Cold War strategy," and worries Chinese President Xi Jinping has concluded a military showdown with the US is "inevitable." Ferguson also fears our massive military aid to Ukraine has reduced our ability to help defend Taiwan if China moves against the island. "The military industrial complex has withered away," he said. "It’s startling to realize how much capacity we’ve expended in Ukraine and how long it will take to replace it." Recall that the Pentagon early on bragged that America aimed to wear down Russia’s military capability by constantly resupplying Ukraine. Ferguson calls this a "strategic error" because Washington "failed to realize that China is the bigger beneficiary" of the policy. "We’re not ready for prime time and all the tough talk about defending Taiwan is from an alternate reality," he said. Given developments, that sobering perspective makes far more sense than the nonsense coming from the White House. Biden’s notorious history of being "wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades," as former Defense Secretary Robert Gates famously put it, does not inspire trust. Moreover, there remains a possibility — no, make it a probability —that the Biden family’s corrupt deals with China tie the president’s hands. His response to the spy balloon suggests he was pulling his punches. He tried to keep the balloon secret from the public so Blinken could go to Beijing to try to reset relations. After civilians spotted the balloon, Biden let it meander across America for four more days until it was shot down. It was an extraordinarily brazen act by China, and officials there followed the shoot-down by demanding that America apologize! Thankfully, Biden didn’t, but days later, shrugged off the incident as "not a major breach." Of course, he also said the fatal withdrawal from Afghanistan was a success and he had stopped inflation. And that Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation, that he never talked to his son about his foreign business and on and on. The big guy says a lot of things that aren’t true. Why trust his assurances now about China? |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Dozens Of WikiLeaks Cables Show US Knew NATO Expansion Was Russia's Bright Red Line |
2023-01-20 |
Commentators have rushed to declare the long-criticized policy of NATO expansion as irrelevant to the war’s outbreak, or as a mere fig leaf used by Russian President Vladimir Putin to mask what Condoleezza Rice and Robert Gates recently called “his messianic mission” to “reestablish the Russian Empire.” Fiona Hill, a presidential advisor to two Republican administrations, has deemed these views merely the product of a “Russian information war and psychological operation,” resulting in “masses of the US public … blaming NATO, or blaming the US for this outcome.” Yet a review of the public record and many dozens of diplomatic cables made publicly available via WikiLeaks shows that US officials were aware, or were directly told over the span of years, that expanding NATO was viewed by Russian officials well beyond Putin as a major threat and provocation, that expanding it to Ukraine was a particularly bright red line for Moscow, that it would inflame and empower hawkish, nationalist parts of the Russian political spectrum, and that it could ultimately lead to war. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Joe Biden's loose lips could sink ships |
2022-05-29 |
![]() That’s the question careening around the world after the president said last week that the United States would respond militarily if China invades Taiwan. The shocking remark in Tokyo came just two months after Biden, on a visit to Poland, insisted Vladimir Putin “cannot remain in power” because of Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine. Both bombshells sent the White House into DEFCON damage control as aides rushed out “clarifications” to insist there was no change in longstanding policies. They said the United States is still only committed to selling Taiwan military equipment to defend itself and claimed Biden was definitely not talking about “regime change” in Russia. In both cases, their attempts amounted to denials the president said what he clearly said. That set off a round of accusations that the unelected staff was subverting the commander in chief and added fresh impetus to questions of whether Biden is really running the White House. Given the many walk-backs, cleanups and clarifications during the brief Biden era, these two incidents would be fairly routine — and almost comical — except for the serious subject matters and the president’s own additional statements. For example, the Tokyo remarks were the third time since he took office that Biden essentially said the same thing about militarily defending Taiwan. Either he means it, or he’s lost it. ... The growing global tensions and doubts about the president’s ability to manage them recall Robert Gates’ infamous assertion that Biden “has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national-security issue over the past four decades.” Gates made the stinging comment in a 2014 memoir, and last year cited Biden’s botched, chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan as current evidence. That history, coupled with the rampant domestic disasters defining Biden’s term, means we are witnessing him at a later stage of life in a bigger job making bigger, more dangerous mistakes. Finally, it is fair but not very comforting to recall Barack Obama’s warning about his former vice president: “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f- -k things up.” |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- | |
Gates seems to double down on claim that Biden's been wrong on top foreign policy issues for decades | |
2021-10-18 | |
[FoxNews] Robert Gates, the former defense secretary under President Obama, seemed to reiterate in an interview that aired Sunday night that he believes President Biden has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades. Gates, who spent about three decades in the CIA, was introspective during an interview with CBS’ "60 Minutes," and was asked by Anderson Cooper, the correspondent, about his 2014 memoir titled, "Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War." Cooper pointed out a part in the book where Gates called Biden a man of integrity but wrote that he believes he’s "been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades." "I think he’s gotten a lot wrong," Gates responded, before pointing out Biden’s opposition to "every one of Ronald Reagan’s military programs to contest the Soviet Union," the first Gulf War, and even pointed to their differences regarding Afghanistan during the Obama administration. He said he believes Biden made a mistake in Afghanistan in the way he handled the withdrawal. Biden has defended his administration and essentially said there was no easy way out of the country after two decades. "When I hear we could have, should have continued the so-called low-grade effort in Afghanistan, at low risk to our service members, at low cost," Biden said. "I don’t think enough people understand how much we’ve asked of the 1 percent of this country who put that uniform on."
"You have to be pretty naïve not to assume things were going to go downhill once that withdrawal was complete," he said. Related: Robert Gates: 2021-08-23 Biden should 'step down in shame' for leaving Americans behind in Afghanistan: Lisa Boothe Robert Gates: 2020-11-25 From Sir With Love - Lord Black of Crossharbour touts ‘important and successful president’ Joe Biden. Robert Gates: 2020-04-11 Biden Claims People Refer to Him as a 'Foreign Policy Expert' | |
Link |
Afghanistan |
Biden should 'step down in shame' for leaving Americans behind in Afghanistan: Lisa Boothe |
2021-08-23 |
LISA BOOTHE: We do not know how many Americans are left in Afghanistan and if we don't know, how do we know we've gotten them all out? How do we know when [the] mission is complete if we don't know how many Americans are in Afghanistan? This just goes to show you... why former defense secretary Robert Gates said Joe Biden has been wrong about every major foreign-policy issue for the past four decades, witnessing what has unfolded over the past few days and he sits there and lies to all of us by trying to tell us this was ’unavoidable?’ Joe Biden owns the disaster in Afghanistan from start to finish. Not only did he vote to authorize the war and go to Afghanistan in the first place but he presides over the biggest foreign-policy blunder in our lifetimes leaving Americans behind and such incompetence not even knowing how many Americans are there...also leaving behind military assets. |
Link |
Britain |
From Sir With Love - Lord Black of Crossharbour touts ‘important and successful president’ Joe Biden. |
2020-11-25 |
![]() In recent months, Joe Biden has proclaimed his dedication to "truth over facts" and claimed that he was running for the U.S. Senate. Unsure of his location at any given time, Biden tells African Americans they "ain’t black" if they fail to support him. He claimed he went to Delaware State but didn’t, and so forth. Joe Biden is less accurate than a broken clock, but consider the appraisal by Conrad Black. "In his most impressive remark in the presidential debates, Biden said that in policy terms, ’I am the party.’" Other impressive debate remarks go missing, but Black recalls that Biden "has been on all sides of almost every issue." No word of Robert Gates’ observation that Biden has been on the "wrong" side of almost every foreign policy issue for the past four decades. According to Lord Black, Biden "is not a true believer in the radical leftist program," which has "absolutely no chance" of being adopted by Congress. And since there is "no practical likelihood" of a second term, Biden will have to work with Congress. Joe Biden "may rank as the least charismatic figure" elected to the White House "but he has his strengths" and is "generally well liked by all those who worked with him in the Senate and the Obama administration and he certainly knows better than any president since Lyndon Johnson how to work out bipartisan legislative compromises." Back in October, Lord Black took a somewhat different view in "Joe Biden is No Franklin Roosevelt." That piece dealt with Biden’s plan to expand the Supreme Court, about which Biden said the people had "no right to know." FDR tried to expand the court and Lord Black is one of President Roosevelt’s biggest fans. |
Link |