Home Front: Culture Wars |
CNN Psychoanalyzes Talk Radio Listeners, Cites Liberal Study on Format |
2009-10-20 |
![]() The correspondent's report, which aired just before the bottom of the 7 am Eastern hour, was the first installment in a "special series on talk radio," according to anchor John Roberts. Costello zeroed in on the listeners and why the format "can capture people for such long periods of time." A graphic on the screen during her report heralded "anger on the air: what listeners don't know about talk radio." [MP3 audio available here] Towards the end of her report, the CNN correspondent played a sound bite from radical left-wing host Randi Rhodes, who speculated that "the reason they don't passionately listen to liberal talk radio is access" (Costello outrageously downplayed Rhodes's political leanings by describing her as someone whom "many consider a liberal talker"). The "liberal talker" noted that apparently, "ninety-one percent of talk radio is conservative." Costello continued that "according to Talkers magazine, liberal talkers fill just nine percent of the nation's news talk radio on the commercial dial. Change that, Rhodes says, and liberal listeners would listen just as much." The 91 percent figure actually came from a 2007 report titled "The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio," written by two liberal organizations- Center for American Progress and Free Press. However, the report, which was co-authored by current FCC "chief diversity officer" Mark Lloyd, "suffers from a number of structural flaws," as a 2008 special report by MRC's Culture and Media Institute pointed out. The CMI report continued that "the CAP report's greatest flaw is ignoring noncommercial talk radio," such as NPR's many public radio affiliates. |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- | |
Fire raging at Universal Studios | |
2008-06-01 | |
A large fire is burning at the world-famous Universal Studios in Los Angeles, California.
Helicopters have been dropping water on to the burning structures, and television pictures showed flames leaping into the air as a thick cloud of smoke covered the site. James Barnes of the LA County Fire Department said the fire had virtually destroyed at least one building, and firefighters were battling to stop the flames from spreading to adjoining structures. He said the fire could now be affecting a King Kong ride at the studios. "There's some Hollywood history going up in smoke today and we're doing our best to minimalise the damage," he told the BBC. Reports suggest the blaze has damaged Universal's New York street scene. There are indications that the sound stage had recently been used for filming, says the BBC's Rajesh Mirchandani in Los Angeles. It is likely that there would have been a good deal of flammable material and props, as well as fuel supplies, on the site, our correspondent adds. Behind-the-scenes tours of the studios are a long-established tradition still popular with visitors today. | |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Democrat Fratricide: "hatred of women" is accepted in the Democratic party! |
2008-05-13 |
Marie Cocco, Real Clear Politics WASHINGTON -- As the Democratic nomination contest slouches toward a close, it's time to take stock of what I will not miss. I will not miss seeing advertisements for T-shirts that bear the slogan "Bros before Hos." The shirts depict Barack Obama (the Bro) and Hillary Clinton (the Ho) and they are widely sold on the Internet. I will not miss walking past airport concessions selling the Hillary Nutcracker, a device in which a pantsuit-clad Clinton doll opens her legs to reveal stainless steel thighs that, well, bust nuts. . . . I won't miss episodes like the one in which the liberal radio personality Randi Rhodes called Clinton a "big f---in' whore" and said the same about former vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro. Rhodes was appearing at an event sponsored by a San Francisco radio station, before an audience of appreciative Obama supporters -- one of whom had promoted the evening on the presumptive Democratic nominee's official campaign Web site. . . . I won't miss political commentators (including National Public Radio political editor Ken Rudin and Andrew Sullivan, the columnist and blogger) who compare Clinton to the Glenn Close character in the movie "Fatal Attraction." In the iconic 1987 film, Close played an independent New York woman who has an affair with a married man played by Michael Douglas. When the liaison ends, the jilted woman becomes I won't miss reading another treatise by a man or woman, of the left or right, who says that sexism has had not even a teeny-weeny bit of influence on the course of the Democratic campaign. To hint that sexism might possibly have had a minimal role is to play that risible "gender card." As we all know, Democrats are just the most tolerant, compassionate, high-minded people ever! They'd never say something bad about someone's skin color, or culture, or religion, or sexual orientation, and anyone who did say something like that would be drummed out of the party post-haste like Kirk Douglas in the opening credits of Branded. Isn't that right? /sarcasam Most of all, I will not miss the silence. I will not miss the deafening, depressing silence of Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean or other leading Democrats, who to my knowledge (with the exception of Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland) haven't uttered a word of public outrage at the unrelenting, sex-based hate that has been hurled at a former first lady and two-term senator from New York. Among those holding their tongues are hundreds of Democrats for whom Clinton has campaigned and raised millions of dollars. Don Imus endured more public ire from the political class when he insulted the Rutgers University women's basketball team. Would the silence prevail if Obama's likeness were put on a tap-dancing doll that was sold at airports? Would the media figures who dole out precious face time to these politicians be such pals if they'd compared Obama with a character in a blaxploitation film? And how would crude references to Obama's sex organs play? Ask Obama Girl. There are many reasons why Clinton is losing the nomination contest, some having to do with her strategic mistakes, others with the groundswell for "change." But for all Clinton's political blemishes, the darker stain that has been exposed is the hatred of women that is accepted as a part of our culture. |
Link |
Home Front: Culture Wars |
Rhodes Out At Air America |
2008-04-10 |
According to John Scott, PD of Clear Channel talk KKGN/San Francisco, suspended talker Randi Rhodes and Air ![]() Rhodes was suspended indefinitely last week by Air America following remarks she made at an appearance for KKGN where she called both Hillary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro "f---cking bitches." An official announcement is expected from Air America about Rhodes' departure on Thursday (April 10). |
Link |
Fifth Column | |
Moonbat Fratricide: Randi Rhodes to sue Air America? | |
2008-04-05 | |
Jeff Norman, Huffasnuffaluffagus Post In a textbook example of "progressives" undermining their own agenda, Air America has suspended its star host Randi Rhodes for telling jokes that generated absolutely no controversy until the network -- two weeks after the now suddenly objectionable comments were made in a stand-up comedy performance -- decided to remove her, at least temporarily, from its airwaves. At an appearance in San Francisco sponsored by Air America's local affiliate, Rhodes referred to Hillary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro as "fucking whores." It's widely understood that this epithet, delivered in the context of a well-received comedic rant, is what prompted the suspension. But Air America's terse statement on the matter offers no explanation beyond declaring it "does not condone such abusive, ad hominem language by our Hosts." ". . . unless it's directed at the Jew-loving drunken fratboy neo-Nazi mouth-breathing extra-chromosome Christer scum in the White House. Then it's cool." It's not detectable at this point if Air America honchos believe Rhodes was somehow supposed to have known what she said is punishable. It's like Michael told Fredo after the meeting with Moe Greene: "don't ever take sides with anyone against the Family again. Ever." Also unknown is the duration of her suspension. According to New York Daily News reporter David Hinckley, the network is remaining silent for now "to gauge public reaction." How principled. Ferraro has wasted no time calling for Rhodes to be fired. The former VP candidate told Fox News earlier today, "What did they do with Don Imus when he went after the young black team who was playing basketball with kind of the same language? Treat them both the same...She's coming at me and Hillary in a ... sexist way... To incite people with language like this young woman just did on radio is very, very dangerous because ... some people take this stuff so seriously that it can affect your security." Understandably, Rhodes is stunned and angry. About her employers she told me: "They are in breach of my contract and have damaged my hard won excellent reputation in the broadcast industry..."
At a critical moment in its evolution, the network has put itself in an untenable position. Ultimately, does Air America, or does it not, stand for free speech? At this moment, it clearly does not. "Suprise meter reading off-scale low, Cap'n." "Thank you, Mister Data." That's not very progressive. | |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Democrat Fratricide: "these people are clearly nasty to anyone who disagrees with them" |
2008-04-04 |
Jim Geraghty, National Review Randi Rhodes called Hillary a [bad word]ing whore. In and of itself, its shocking, but its otherworldly when we think about what Hillary Clinton has meant to liberals for most of the past sixteen years. Maybe Bill Richardson owes James Carville money, because that would help explain the bitter jihad the former Clinton strategist seems to be on, so relentlessly decrying the New Mexico Governor as Judas that Richardson stopped doing media appearances. It didnt take much for Obama-backing General McPeak to declare Bill Clinton the equivalent of Joe McCarthy. And if youve read any Hillary vs. Obama thread on a liberal blog lately, you know that there have been friendlier back-and-forth exchanges in snakepits. Theres something vaguely reassuring about all this, from the view of sitting on the right. It reveals to conservatives that the nastiness exhibited in our earlier disagreements with these folks was never personal; these people are clearly nasty to anyone who disagrees with them. As someone famously said, the Left is more interested in burning heretics than in winning converts. Geraldine Ferraros long service to the Democratic party not to mention her historic status as the first woman VP nominee means nothing to many Obama backers; shes a racist, David Duke in drag, as Rhodes put it. Im sure Senator Patrick Leahy thought his decades of work on the left side of the aisle including his work on Clinton's impeachment defense had bought him some street cred from feminists, but no, he was called sexist when he called on Hillary to leave the race. Hillary gets called a "monster" by Obama's surrogates; Hillary's surrogates wonder out loud if Obama ever sold drugs. Today Clinton surrogate Ed Rendell speculates that Americans know only half the story of Barack Obama. Day in, day out, in this race it continues. Is there nastiness on the right? Sure. But its hard to imagine somebody being the equivalent hero to the right the way Hillary was a hero to the left, so suddenly and severely pitched overboard no, thats not it, denounced and demonized when somebody else came along. . . . To get a full appreciation for just how nasty things are, look at MoveOn.org: it was originally formed to save Bill Clinton's bacon in Monicagate, and now it is one of the Clintons' worst enemies. |
Link |
Fifth Column |
Moonbat Fratricide: "Air America is now the Jesus W Bush network!" |
2008-04-04 |
![]() Shame on you Charlie Kireker! You have clearly violated Ms Rhodes Constitutional right to Free Speech. Even though you may have been one of the sponsors for her appearance, a simple statement that you do not condone her public language should have sufficed. Instead, you have silenced one of the only voices on the radio that actually has the nerve to speak the TRUTH about what is going on in the world! How is it that Vice President Dick Cheney can tell Senator Pat Leahy to Go F Himself on the floor of the U.S. Senate, with anger and venom and not in jest, and never even be held accountable for his total disrespect of this distinguished person? But, you, Mr. Kireker suspend Randi for doing a comedy act not even aired by your station! What a despicable and cowardly act on your part! Randi has become so many of our voices. It's a damn shame that her knowledge, outstanding research capability and her willingness to educate in the most unique fashion is being trumped by a politically incorrect stand-up comedy routine!!! For God's sake, you corporate gurus at Air America are single handedly willing to take this away from us... for what? Political correctness? Bowing to the Clintons? (don't tell me they had no hand in this... their political claws are OUT!!) This is shameful! Randi is a breath of fresh air, whether you agree with her or not, ONLY because she's willing to cut the crap. As a wife, mother of 2 teenagers, registered nurse and an independent thinker... who lives in the midwest and has, along with millions of Americans, been completely traumatized from the multitude of crimes committed by this horrendous Bush Administration..... I demand that Randi be re-instated immediately, be completely vindicated, and allowed to resume her show UNALTERED by political correctness. I'm completely discouraged that voices are being suppressed and the "dumbing down" of Americans continues. I, for one, will cancel my Premium Membership if that's what it takes, and only listen to Mike Malloy on Nova M Radio, or The Young Turks (who recently left Air America voluntarily....wonder why?) You corporate thugs only listen to one God.... Money. Sincerely pissed off, Kelly Shepherd This last one heer is a real classic (emphasis added): I agree with everything Ms Rhodes said. Air America is now the Jesus W Bush network. It's time for another bankruptcy to go with your ethical bankruptcy. |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
Air America suspends Randi Rhodes for offensive language (I am not making this up!) |
2008-04-03 |
Air America host Randi Rhodes called both Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton "whores" in a recent appearance, seen below. Rhodes, who hosts a weekday radio show on Air America, said to the cheering crowd, "What a whore Geraldine Ferraro is! She's such a fucking whore!" She then proceeded to say, "Hillary is a big fucking whore, too" to a mixed audience reaction. "You know why she's a big fucking whore? Because her deal is always, 'Read the fine print, asshole!'" Video here. Update: Rhodes has been now been suspended from the network. Air America released the following statement: Air America has suspended on-air host Randi Rhodes for making inappropriate statements about prominent figures, including Senator Hillary Clinton, at a recent public appearance on behalf of Air America in San Francisco which was sponsored by an Air America affiliate station. Well, thank goodness! I'm glad Air America won't stand for abusive, ad hominem language from its on-air personalities. So, then, if, say, for example, if Jeanne Garofolo or Al Franken were to utter something abusive and ad hominem about George W. Bush or the Pope or John McCain, they'd be out the door in a New York minute. Right? Hey! why is everyone laughing at me? Do i have toilet paper stuck to my shoe or something? . . . |
Link |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Air America errs: Randi Rhodes not mugged |
2007-10-17 |
"Captain Ed" Morissey An update on yesterday's Rantburg article. ![]() The only fly in the ointment? Rhodes never got mugged at all: Air America radio host Randi Rhodes is temporarily off the air, but claims she was brutally attacked near her Manhattan apartment are bogus, her lawyer and a police source said today. So what are we to make of this? 1. Air America lies, even when stories involve their own personnel. No one thought to give Randi a call to see how she was doing before Elliot decided to air his report? And no one thought to do so afterwards? The police ended up calling to see why no one reported the incident to them. That's just marvelous journalistic ethics. 2. Anyone who thinks that bigotry has no place in the liberal mindset has -- once again -- just received a material lesson to the contrary. Even without knowing anything about the attacker, several bloggers just decided that it had to be a politically motivated assault by a conservative. That's not leaping to conclusions, that's flying at jet speed to Paranoialand. . . . What an embarrassment, especially for Air America. They have once again demonstrated why no one listens to them, and it has nothing to do with the Fairness Doctrine. It has everything to do with credibility. They can't even do fact-checking with their colleagues, let alone anywhere else. Addendum: I'm sorry to hear that Rhodes injured herself in a fall, and hope she feels better soon. I'm glad that she apparently still has all her teeth, too. Michelle Malkin has more: The nutroots are sorely disappointed. But the truth isnt likely to stop them from believing that its the Reich-wings fault. Get the T-shirt here. |
Link |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Air America shock jock files "fake but inaccurate" mugging report |
2007-10-16 |
James Taranto, "Best of the Web" The left-wing Talking Radio blog claims that an Air America hostess has been a victim of crime in New York: Randi Rhodes was mugged on Sunday night on 39th Street and Park Ave, nearby her Manhattan apartment, while she was walking her dog Simon. Not only was there no evidence the mugging was politically motivated, but New York's Daily News says it was all a hoax: "Claims she was brutally attacked near her Manhattan apartment are bogus, her lawyer and a police source said today." Over at DU and Kos, they're probably asking themselves, "How did he do it? How did KKKarl Rove get to Randi Rhodes?" Oh well, just remember, there was a time, 15 or 20 or 30 years ago, when getting mugged in New York was not even unusual. Thank you, Rudy Giuliani. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | |
Air America Files for Bankruptcy Protection | |
2006-10-14 | |
![]() The network had denied rumors just a month ago that it would file for bankruptcy protection. On Friday, Air America spokeswoman Jaime Horn told the AP that the filing became necessary only recently after negotiations with a creditor from the privately held company's early days broke down. Ms. Horn declined to name the creditor with which talks had reached a logjam. The company will operate in the interim with funding from its current investor group, Ms. Horn said.
According to documents filed with U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Air America owes Franken $360,750 and $9.8 million to RealNetworks Inc. CEO Robert Glaser, who owns 36.7 percent of the company and had previously served as its chairman. Tracy Klestadt of Klestadt & Winters LLP, an attorney for Air America's parent company, Piquant LLC, said Rob Glaser had resigned as a director as of Friday morning. GMr. laser, along with two others, is providing new financing through Piquant investor group Democracy Allies LLC. | |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
A new low in Bush-hatred |
2006-09-10 |
SIX YEARS into the Bush administration, are there any new lows to which the Bush-haters can sink? George W. Bush has been smeared by the left with every insult imaginable. He has been called a segregationist who yearns to revive Jim Crow and compared ad nauseam to Adolf Hitler. His detractors have accused him of being financially entwined with Osama bin Laden. Of presiding over an American gulag. Of being a latter-day Mussolini. Howard Dean has proffered the ``interesting theory" that the Saudis tipped off Bush in advance about 9/11. One US senator (Ted Kennedy) has called the war in Iraq a ``fraud" that Bush ``cooked up in Texas" for political gain; another ( Vermont independent James Jeffords) has charged him with planning a war in Iran as a strategy to put his brother in the White House. Cindy Sheehan has called him a ``lying bastard," a ``filth spewer," an ``evil maniac," a ``fuehrer," and a ``terrorist" guilty of ``blatant genocide" -- and been rewarded for her invective with oceans of media attention. What else can they say about Bush? That they want him killed? They already say it. On Air America, talk show host Randi Rhodes recommended doing to Bush what Michael Corleone, in ``The Godfather, Part II," does to his brother. ``Like Fredo," she said, ``somebody ought to take him out fishing and phuw!" -- then imitated the sound of a gunshot. In the Guardian, a leading British daily, columnist Charlie Brooker issued a plea: ``John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr. -- where are you now that we need you?" For the more literary Bush-hater, there is ``Checkpoint," a novel by Nicholson Baker in which two characters discuss the wisdom of shooting the president. ``I'm going to kill that bastard," one character fumes. Some Bush-hatred masquerades as art: At Chicago's Columbia College, a curated exhibit included a sheet of mock postage stamps bearing the words ``Patriot Act" and depicting President Bush with a gun to his head. There are even Bush-assassination fashion statements, such as the ``KILL BUSH" T-shirts that were on offer last year at CafePress, an online retailer. Lurid political libels have a long history in American life. The lies told about John Adams in the campaign of 1800 were vile enough, his wife Abigail lamented, ``to ruin and corrupt the minds and morals of the best people in the world." But has there ever been a president so hated by his enemies that they lusted openly for his death? Or tried to gratify that lust with such political pornography? As with other kinds of porn, even the most graphic expressions of Bush-hatred tend to jade those who gorge on it, so that they crave ever more explicit material to achieve the same effect. Which brings us to ``Death of a President," a new movie about the assassination of George W. Bush. Written and directed by British filmmaker Gabriel Range, the movie premieres today at the Toronto Film Festival and will air next month on Britain's Channel 4. Shot in the style of a documentary, the movie opens with what looks like actual footage of Bush being gunned down by a sniper as he leaves a Chicago hotel in October 2007. Through the use of digital special effects, the film superimposes the president's face onto the body of the actor playing him, so that the mortally wounded man collapsing on the screen will seem, all too vividly, to be Bush himself. This is Bush-hatred as a snuff film. The fantasies it feeds are grotesque and obscene; to pander to such fantasies is to rip at boundary-markers that are indispensable to civilized society. That such a movie could not only be made but lionized at an international film festival is a mark not of sophistication, but of a sickness in modern life that should alarm conservatives and liberals alike. Naturally that's not how the film's promoters see it. Noah Cowan, one of the Toronto festival's codirectors, high-mindedly describes ``Death of a President" as ``a classic cautionary tale." Well, yes, Bush's assassination is ``harrowing," he says, but what the film is really about is ``how the Patriot Act, especially, and how Bush's divisive partisanship and race-baiting has forever altered America." I can't help wondering, though, whether some of those who see this film will take away rather a different message. John Hinckley, in his derangement, had the idea that shooting the president was the way to impress a movie star. After seeing ``Death of a President," the next Hinckley may get a more grandiose idea: Shooting the president is the way to become a movie star. |
Link |