Iraq |
Are Sadr and al-Qaeda Teaming Up in Iraq? |
2008-04-29 |
April 28, 2008 - by Omar Fadhil A few days ago, there were two suspiciously coordinated statements emerging from Iraq. Muqtada al-Sadr made open-war threats followed immediately by a similar threat from al-Qaeda. As they say, there is usually no smoke without fire. Respected Iraqi writer and lawyer Suleiman Hakim (a prominent writer regularly published on the leading Iraqi politics and culture website Kitabat ) reported on April 11 more than a week before Sadr and Abu Ayyub made their threats about serious negotiations taking place between Sadrs movement and a leader of the Islamic army group. The meetings, Hakim believes, are taking place in Syria and Lebanon and are sponsored by a special Syrian security apparatus specialized in Iraqi affairs. Sheik Zergani [Sadrs representative in Lebanon] and Sadrs representative in Syria met in the Lebanese capital last March with Mr. Khalil Jumeily [a leader of the Islamic army] and after preliminary discussions in which they exchanged their views about the situation in Iraq and their plans for overthrowing the existing order and reviewing the positions of domestic and regional allies, they decided to resume the discussions in Damascus so that once they reach specific agreements, one certain Syrian security apparatus in charge of Iraqi issues would witness and sponsor those agreements the relationships between Sadr movement and the Islamic army are not outside the frame of the Iran-Syria alliance. And so these relationships are being restored after being severed in the aftermath of the holy shrines bombings in 2006 and the massacres committed by Mahdi army indiscriminately against Sunni Iraqis. The main requirement of the new agreement is that the Islamic army launch wide operations against American and government targets and to take control of cities and towns near the armys strongholds, in addition to the provision of assistance and backup to the Mahdi army once Muqtada unfreezes the army and gives the green light for starting the battle against the authority of the Shia coalition. [The objective is] to create a new situation on the ground that forces the American forces to negotiate a new formula for power and authority in Iraq The fact that this story was written almost days before both al-Qaeda leaders sent in a wave of audio recordings and Muqtada threatened open war gives them increased credibility. True, the idea of the Islamic army cooperating with Mahdi army sounds as peculiar as it always has. Not because of the sectarian difference, because the two groups did cooperate and sent reinforcements to each other back in 2004 during the battles of Fallujah and Najaf. Its because by considering a new joint venture with Sadr the Islamic army is making two huge mistakes. Its true that the leaders of the group are likely not politically savvy and driven by emotion, but it still should be easy for them to understand that this would be a blunder. Why? First, by siding with Sadr theyd be obviously choosing a losing partner in the long run, and the bet on quick gains through a nationwide shock offensive is too much of a longshot stretch, with highly unpredictable outcome. Second, and most important, is that former Sunni insurgent groups (the Islamic army being one of the most prominent), by turning against al-Qaeda, have already created for themselves better bargaining positions when it comes to negotiating the future distribution of power in the country with the government or the U.S. It is close to impossible to truly gauge what the leaders of these groups are thinking because we still dont have enough knowledge about the subtleties that underlie the relationships between the different factions within the Sunni insurgency in general, and the Islamic army in particular. But we Iraqis need to stay alert, for something nasty might be brewing for us in Damascus. Omar Fadhil is PJM Baghdad editor. His own blog is Iraq The Model. |
Link |
Iraq |
Al-Qaeda in Iraq: Determined but Desperate |
2008-04-22 |
by Omar Fadhil The latest three messages from al-Qaeda addressing the Sunni community uncover the depth of the crisis that al-Qaeda is facing in its former host community. The threatening tone of the missives from the alleged Abu Omar Baghdadi and Aby Ayyub, and the insulting tone of the second by Zawahiri, reflect mistrust, anxiety and a dire need to retrieve what was lost. Death threats do not represent a serious call for cooperation on an achievable objective. This work-for-me-or-I-kill-you tone is completely different from the usual recruiting slogans that have focused on the ideology of fighting for absolute truth against absolute evil. Those slogans have failed, which is why they have been discarded and replaced by threats and an effort to seek out third parties to render verdicts on disagreements, which is what Baghdadi alluded to when he proposed that some (not all!) Sunni clerics come forward to mediate between al-Qaeda and the public. This call for mediation indicates first, that al-Qaeda has lost direct contact with the public and second, that there are still some clerics involved with al-Qaeda. This is the main reason why people have abandoned the Association of Muslim scholars and its also the reason that moderate Sunni clerics declare war on the organization. This is also a reason for the conflict between some tribes with some members of the Islamic party. One suspects that a group of the partys members are essentially stuck with al-Qaeda: they cant walk away because of the incriminating evidence al-Qaeda has against them and could threaten to expose. Of course the threatening messages had to be backed with action in order to be taken seriously; the bombings in Mosul, Anbar and Diyala served as the actual bloody part of the message. Here we can note, however, that the act didnt match the threat. Instead of killing security forces and awakening fighters only (whom al-Qaeda calls collaborators) the murderous crimes reached civilians who had nothing to do with the whole conflict. Although one attack targeted a funeral of two awakening members, the actual victims were noncombatant mourners. These crimes demonstrate that the principles and values that al-Qaeda touted are false and that the old ways have failed. Otherwise al-Qaeda wouldnt have switched to terrorizing fellow Sunnis instead of promising mansions in heaven and dozens of virgins. More at the link... |
Link |
Iraq |
Signs that the terrorists are losing in Iraq |
2007-10-08 |
Omar Fadhil, Wall Street Journal BAGHDAD--The latest chapter in al Qaeda's war manual in their war against the Iraqi people and the Coalition is this: raiding remote peaceful villages, burning down homes and slaughtering both man and beast. It's a campaign of self destruction. For about a year al Qaeda has been trying to build a so called Islamic State in Iraq. On several occasions al Qaeda has even declared parts of Baghdad or other places in other provinces the capital of this Islamic State. But now that they are losing one base after another, their objective seems to have changed from adding more towns and villages to the "state" to destroying the very same towns and villages. Obviously, it's all about making headlines regardless of the means to do that. This change in plans began to take shape with the battle between al Qaeda and the joint forces on Sept. 6 and 7 in Hor Rijab and then the massacre that followed in the same spot a week later and finally the attacks on other villages north, south and east of Baghdad in the last week or so. Actually first I'd like to recommend reading a good post by Jules Crittenden about the flawed timing of this "Little Tet. Anyway, our interest today is more about the field situation and strategy than about timing since the latter seems to be not so friendly to al Qaeda. Well, actually timing is very important here too but at a rather different level. In my opinion al Qaeda found itself forced to start this villages war. It wasn't a choice as much as a last resort because villages are among the few fighting spaces that al Qaeda can still utilize as large cities become increasingly difficult for them to operate in. They know that without engaging the enemy--that's us by the way--their existence and influence would end and I'm almost positive that they feel bitter about having to fight this way. . . . Mr. Fadhil and his brother Mohammed write a blog, Iraq the Model, from Baghdad. |
Link |
Iraq |
Abu Omar al-Baghdadi Deceased? |
2007-05-03 |
Seems promising, but not yet confirmed. I think Fox News just confirmed it, but I was only listening with one ear... ![]() Al-Iraqiya says Interior Ministry spokesman Brigadier general Abdul Kareem Khalaf confirmed that the ministrys forces have retrieved al-Baghdadis body. Unlike the alleged killing of Abu Ayyub al-Masri earlier this week, today theres an official statement from a high Iraqi official and the incident took place inside the Iraqi capital, not in a remote area where information is more difficult to collect and rumors abound. Still, the news is yet to be confirmed by more sources including US officials. |
Link |
Iraq |
FLASH: In Progress, Iraqi Tribes Battle al-Qaeda. 39 Terrorists Killed |
2007-03-20 |
ht/ ITMBy Omar Fadhil, PJM editor, Baghdad The Al-bu Issa tribes in Amiriyat al-Fallujah, backed by local police and the MNF, clashed today with members of the al-Qaeda linked Islamic State in Iraq terror organization, according to al-Hurra TV. The tribe involved in the clashes has opposed al-Qaeda for months now and is part of the Awakening Council. sic Sunni Tribes fighting al-Qaeda in Iraq. The battles that are still ongoing have so far left 39 terrorists killed including the ministers of oil and war of the terror organization. Six policemen and 11 tribal fighters were also killed during the fighting. w00t The report adds that US troops found and securely detonated a tanker filled with chlorine gas the terrorists were planning to use in chemical attacks on the area. together we stand, spread the woid Meanwhile, a police force of 500, conducting raids in northern and central parts of Ramadi, captured weapons and bomb-making material, and arrested dozens of suspects. Tracking . UPDATE: More on the tribes involved These tribes have been sending thousands of young men to join the government security forces or their paramilitary units to cooperate with US and Iraqi commanders to fight insurgents. (AFP) |
Link |