Government Corruption |
Here We Go. Obama Under Investigation for Corruption Scandal |
2025-07-16 |
FBI Director Kash Patel has launched a "Grand Criminal Conspiracy" investigation into the decade-long weaponization of the federal government — a probe that specifically circumvents the statute of limitations, allowing Sherlocks to finally pursue justice for long-buried crimes. According to a report by JustTheNews, Barack Obama I am the change that you seek... , John Brennan ...director of the CIA under the Obama administration. One of the deeper dwelling denizens of the Deep State, probably the guy who lit the match that launched the Russiagate coup attempt... , James Clapper, James The spine of the FBI is the rule of lawComey ![]() , and other high-level Obama-era operatives have been named in the investigation, which shows a coordinated criminal conspiracy to target political enemies, shield Democrat allies, and manipulate multiple presidential elections — from 2016 through 2024. But it gets better: The probe may now shift jurisdiction to Florida — thanks to none other than Special Counsel Jack Smith’s own raid on Mar-a-Lago. The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Solomon teased that within the next 10 days, bombshell revelations would be made public — possibly exposing how weaponized federal agencies colluded to rig the political landscape against Trump and deceive the American people. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | |
Trump Calls 'Epstein List' Democrats' Fabrication Against Him | |
2025-07-14 | |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
![]() "For years, Epstein, over and over again. Why release documents written by [former US President Barack ] Obama, corrupt [former Secretary of State] Hillary [ Clinton ]... They created the Epstein dossier, like they created the Hillary Clinton fake and the [former British intelligence officer] Christopher Steele dossier that they used against me," he wrote on the social network Truth Social. The head of the White House clarified that the Democrats invented the Epstein dossier together with the former heads of the CIA and FBI and representatives of the administration of former President Joe Biden. According to him, if there was anything in the documents, they would have been published. As reported by the Regnum news agency, the US Justice Department and the FBI had previously concluded that there was no evidence that Epstein, who was convicted of sexual crimes against minors, blackmailed influential people and kept a so-called client list. On July 8, the White House denied the existence of Epstein's "compromising list." However, American entrepreneur Elon Musk expressed doubt and said that Americans would not be able to trust the US president if he refused to publish documents on the case. | |
Link |
Olde Tyme Religion |
US Muslim inmate who won beard case claims retaliatory transfer by Arkansas officials |
2025-07-13 |
[IsraelTimes] Gregory Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad, was supported by Orthodox Jewish and other groups in 2015 Supreme Court case that upheld his right to maintain half-inch beard A Moslem inmate who won a US Supreme Court case upholding his right to grow a beard for religious reasons said in a lawsuit that Arkansas officials transferred him to a federal prison in West Virginia in retaliation for several other lawsuits he has filed. The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas filed the lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Gregory Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad, claiming the transfer violated his constitutional rights. In 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Holt could maintain a half-inch beard because Arkansas prison officials could not substantiate claims that the beard posed a security risk. The lawsuit filed Thursday argues his transfer was an effort to disrupt his advocacy on behalf of himself and other inmates. "Mr. Muhammad’s history of meritorious litigation showcases the ability of the legal system to provide justice to all, including prisoners," the lawsuit said. "The Court should not tolerate the (state’s) retaliatory transfer aimed at suppressing Mr. Muhammad’s meritorious litigation and legal work." But it would be legitimate if they were all frivolous, nonmeritorious suits, right? A spokesperson for the Arkansas Department of Corrections declined to comment on the lawsuit. Jeff LeMaster, a spokesperson for Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin, said Griffin’s office was reviewing the lawsuit and would "vigorously" defend the state.Holt has six active lawsuits against the Arkansas Department of Corrections, according to the complaint. Six sounds like he’s spending too much time reading law books in the prison library in search of hooks to hang litigation on. The lawsuit accuses the head of the division of correction of unilaterally pursuing Holt’s transfer to a federal facility after the idea was raised in a mediation session in one of his lawsuits.Since being moved to the West Virginia facility, the ACLU said, Holt has been denied access to basic hygiene, religious services and contact with his lawyers. The lawsuit said he also has lost access to ongoing casework and legal documents that support his cases. The lawsuit said that since Holt is still a state inmate, Arkansas has the power to order his return to a state facility. "This ordeal has made Mr. Muhammad loathe to ever trust the mediation process or participate in a mediation with the ADC (or any other government actor) again," the lawsuit said. In his US Supreme Court case, Holt claimed that he has a right to grow a beard under a federal law aimed at protecting prisoners’ religious rights. He had the support of then-US President Barack Obama They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them... ’s administration, …of course he did… religious groups and atheists alike.Among Holt’s supporters was a coalition of Orthodox Jewish groups including the Orthodox Union. Holt is serving a life sentence for a brutal assault on his girlfriend and was being held at a maximum-security prison 43 kilometers (26 miles) southeast of Little Rock. His case first came to the US Supreme Court’s attention when he filed a handwritten plea to the court asking it to block enforcement of Arkansas’ no-beard rule. |
Link |
Government Corruption |
John Brennan's Checkered Past Comes Back to Haunt Him Amid DOJ Investigation |
2025-07-12 |
They are very angry about this, but let’s just review why there might be some culpability. Take John Brennan. He was a big proponent of waterboarding and enhanced interrogation under President George W. Bush’s administration and the things that went on in Guantanamo. I’m not gonna comment on whether they were right or wrong. But he flipped to condition himself to go into the Obama administration, and then he attacked the very president that he had served, George Bush. Then he began sounding off about Islam—"Religion of Peace"; "Jihadism is not a violent act"—to condition himself further to be appointed by President Barack Obama, which he was, eventually, a CIA director. But then he started lying. I mean, he always probably lied, but I mean, flagrantly so. He said before Congress and the media there wasn’t one civilian killed by Obama’s targeted assassination program via Predators on the Afghan or Pakistan border. Actually, there were 50 or 75 innocent people we killed. He was caught in that lie. Three years later, he went before the Congress and there was information that he had been tapping, his CIA, the staffers for the Senate to get into their computers. He not only lied about it, he did so emphatically—"Oh, we would never do that. That’s horrible." Then he was forced to say, "Yes, I lied." In both cases, there were no perjury charges, nothing. The pièce de résistance for John Brennan was in October 2020, on the eve of the second and critical presidential debate, Joe Biden was in trouble. People were furious about this laptop. There was pornography on it. There was drug use. There were references to Joe Biden as "Mr. Big Guy." Ten percent that he’d been giving money. He was crooked. People wanted to hear, he had no excuse. So, what happened? Antony Blinken, his future secretary of state, campaign aid, called Michael Morell, interim CIA director at one point, said, "Round them up." So, 51 "intelligence authorities" swore the laptop had all the hallmarks of Russian information. Notice the words: All the hallmarks, escape clause, of Russian information. Not disinformation, but that’s what they meant. So, what happened in the debate? Donald Trump went right after Biden and said, "That laptop is real. It shows that you’re a crook. It shows your son is a miscreant." And Joe Biden’s, "How dare you? Fifty-one Intelligence authorities swear that it’s a product of Russian espionage. Only you and Rudy Giuliani believe that." And it was effective. |
Link |
Israel-Palestine-Jordan | |||||||
The Most Explosive Story You Haven't Heard: Netanyahu, Trump, and the Fight Behind the Front Lines | |||||||
2025-07-13 | |||||||
[IsraelUnwired] While most eyes are fixed on the war in Gaza, few realize that the real battle for Israel’s future is being fought by Netanyahu and Trump in the shadows, and this may be the most explosive story you haven’t heard. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s latest trip to Washington, his third this year and second meeting with former President Donald Trump on this trip itself, sparked intense speculation: Was it about Gaza? Iran? A future regional deal? Yes, all that—but ultimately, something deeper is unfolding. These meetings aren’t just about military coordination or diplomatic pressure. It reflects a shared understanding: no external victory is possible without also confronting internal dysfunction.
Let’s zoom out. From the very start of the war, a coordinated bloc of senior legal officials, top IDF officers, and mainstream media figures — Israel’s unelected elite — has worked systematically to hijack the war narrative, destabilize Netanyahu’s government, and prevent a decisive victory in Gaza.
Netanyahu, understanding this dynamic, pursued a war strategy that included limited, tactical ceasefires — not as surrender but as a way to save lives while undercutting the protest movement that had co-opted the hostage issue. The results are clear: what once paralyzed the country has become a fringe cause, as the public increasingly sees through the exploitation of genuine pain for political gain.
Just listen to Brigadier General (res.) Erez Wiener, former head of planning in the IDF Southern Command, who revealed: "We should have started by evacuating Gaza City. But we didn’t. Because the Military Advocate General said: ’You can’t force civilians to evacuate — and you must keep supplying them with aid.’ Then we’re told: go in and fight, but under those conditions. The result? More fallen soldiers."
This isn’t a political opinion. It’s operational reality from someone who helped run the war effort. And the same unelected legal elites who have paralyzed our war effort have been waging a crusade against IDF soldiers, including the ones who served at the Sde Teiman prison. The legal establishment accused them of abuse, relying on testimony they told a Hamas terrorist to say, and a video—exposed to have been doctored with no proof whatsoever of any wrongdoing. Yet, the blood libel was launched into the world. This same legal elite have ignored the far more troubling misconduct inside their own ranks. There has been no investigation into the legal insiders allegedly involved in doctoring and leaking that video of prisoner treatment—a manipulated video that was leaked to the media on a silver platter. That clip reached billions of viewers worldwide, fueling a modern-day blood libel, and just days ago, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese cited it as "proof" that Israeli soldiers systematically sexually harasses Hamas terrorists in custody. The video’s leak didn’t just smear Israel’s name, it endangered our global legitimacy, demoralized our soldiers, and handed Hamas a diplomatic victory. Yet while soldiers face public crucifixion, those within the legal system who enabled this international scandal remain untouched, protected by the very legal institutions now claiming to defend "ethics" and "rule of law." What kind of justice system holds soldiers to impossible standards in combat in a just war but shields those sabotaging the war effort from within? Israeli attorney Efraim Dimri recently said in an interview that he has proof that ties the Biden administration directly to the legal persecution of the IDF soldiers in Sde Teiman prison.
And it’s not just about the military. The U.S. Department of Justice recently issued a second official notice to the far-left Israeli NGO Blue and White demanding documentation about tens of millions of dollars it received from the Biden administration.
And now, even the ideological architects of Israel’s activist legal system are admitting the stakes. Former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak, who reshaped Israel’s judiciary in the 1990s, recently said last week: "If Netanyahu leaves political life, there would be no justification for continuing the trial... If he retires from politics, I think it’s not a bad idea that the trial should also come to an end." That’s a stunning statement. If the charges against Netanyahu are real, they should proceed, regardless of politics. And if they’re not, they should be dropped now. Instead, we’re told that if Netanyahu walks away, the system will quietly let the charges go. That’s not the rule of law—it’s political leverage. This is why the Netanyahu—Trump alignment matters. Not because of personalities or partisan politics—but because both leaders now face the same challenge: unelected deep state institutions that have drifted from their mandates, acting as power centers unto themselves. This isn’t about Left or Right—it’s about democratic accountability. When unelected legal officials override government decisions on life-and-death military policy, that’s a crisis. When US-funded NGOs run political pressure campaigns to topple our government, especially during wartime, that’s a threat. When top military brass ignore binding cabinet decisions, that’s not "independence"—it’s insubordination. We’ve seen this before. In 1982, during the First Lebanon War, internal pressure campaigns and foreign condemnation — fueled by the Sabra and Shatila massacre by Lebanese Christians — led to Israel’s premature ending of the war. Then too, rising casualties and media pressure were weaponized to halt a war mid-fight. Netanyahu remembers that moment well. He’s determined not to let history repeat itself. He has already delivered major blows to Iran’s proxy network, damaged Iran’s nuclear and ballistic weapons programs, weakened Hamas’s military infrastructure, and resisted global pressure for a premature ceasefire. But to finish the job, he must also take back control at home. That means restoring civilian authority over military and legal bodies. It means confronting insubordination directly. And it means telling the public a hard truth: We are not struggling slowly in Gaza because of Hamas’s strength, but because of deep state senior positions who weaken our resolve, handcuff our army, and try to divide our people in wartime. This is not just a war against terrorists in tunnels. It’s a war against fear, dysfunction, and the deep-state machinery—in both Jerusalem and Washington—that has worked to erode the authority of Israel’s elected governments and sabotage their ability to act. Now, Netanyahu and Trump are doing more than comparing notes, they are forging a joint strategy to confront and dismantle the unelected power centers that have hijacked policy in both countries. The parallel power structures that allowed U.S. State Department—funded NGOs to operate freely in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, without oversight or accountability, are finally being brought to an end. This isn’t about defending one leader or another. It’s about defending democracy itself—the right of free nations to be governed by those the people choose, not those the system protects. No more legal vetoes on war policy. No more foreign-funded interference. No more unelected elites dragging nations into paralysis and defeat. What began as meetings in Washington DC may well be remembered as the start of a coordinated effort to reclaim democratic control, to stop the sabotage, protect sovereignty, and chart a path forward based on strength—not submission. The world is watching. And this time, the people, not the unelected deep state bureaucrats, must win. | |||||||
Link |
Government Corruption |
Gregg Jarrett Explains How Brennan And Comey ‘Tried To Entrap Trump' And Then ‘Hobbled' His Presidency |
2025-07-12 |
![]() Comey and Brennan are under criminal investigation for potential misconduct related to the Steele dossier, which fueled the FBI’s probe into alleged Russian collusion during Trump’s 2016 campaign. During an appearance on "Kudlow," Jarrett explained how Comey used the phony dossier to secure a FISA warrant, misleading judges by calling the document credible while withholding critical details. "They used the dossier to try to entrap Trump in the infamous Trump Tower meeting just days before he was sworn into office. That didn’t work. So then Comey purloins FBI documents and leaks them to the media for the sole purpose of triggering the special counsel, which is his longtime friend and mentor, Bob Mueller, who’s a thundercloud over Donald Trump for more than two years of his presidency. And it really hobbled his ability to get things done," Jarrett said. Related: John Brennan 07/09/2025 Former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey are under criminal investigation John Brennan 07/09/2025 Fired State Dept bureaucrats reportedly using their regime change skills to sabotage Trump John Brennan 07/08/2025 CIA review suggests Brennan misled Congress on Steele Dossier and 2016 intel, lawmakers want probe Related: James Comey 07/09/2025 Former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey are under criminal investigation James Comey 07/03/2025 New: CIA Assessment Reveals How Far Obama Administration Went to Frame Trump, Implicates Officials James Comey 05/26/2025 Confused, Starving Reporters Now Desperate for Food After Killing American Journalism |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | |
Inside longtime Biden aide's marathon closed-door grilling in House GOP cover-up probe | |
2025-07-12 | |
[FoxNews] Ashley Williams said she could not recall things 'an untold number of times,' a source said Ashley Williams, a longtime ally of former President Joe Biden, met with House investigators behind closed doors for nearly six hours Friday as Republicans probe allegations the Democrat's top aides hid his mental decline. A source familiar with the transcribed interview told Fox News Digital Williams said she did not "recall" various things "an untold number of times." "Examples include she could not recall if she spoke with President Biden in the last week, if teleprompters were used for Cabinet meetings, if there were discussions about President Biden using a wheelchair, if there were discussions about a cognitive test, if she discussed a mental or physical decline of President Biden, if she ever had to wake President Biden up and how she got involved with his 2020 campaign," the source said. Williams told House investigators Biden is fit to be president today, the source said.
Any allegations of wrongdoing so far have been denied by the ex-president's allies. But Republican investigators have pointed to Biden's disastrous June 2024 debate and subsequent revelations in the media that there were more concerns from Biden's inner circle about his fitness for office than previously known. Williams, however, argued he was in command of himself during that debate, the source said. The former White House aide said nothing to reporters when entering or leaving the committee meeting room for her voluntary interview. Fox News Digital reached out to Williams' lawyers for their account of events inside the room. It was a staff-led meeting, but Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, briefly stopped in for just under 30 minutes to show "solidarity" with the witness, the progressive told reporters afterward. "I do think that it is important that I show up because if they are going to make allegations about the former commander in chief, egregious allegations they continue to wage, I want to make sure that I'm in the room to correct the record because a lot of times they like to mischaracterize things," she said. When asked by Fox News Digital if the interview was still ongoing as she exited, Crockett answered, "It's still going. I'm leaving early. I've got to get to another thing." The source who spoke with Fox News Digital said Crockett had come in during the GOP's questioning session and did not ask any questions herself. Fox News Digital reached out to her office for a response. Williams is a longtime Biden ally whose time with the Democrat goes back to assisting second lady Jill Biden during the Obama administration, according to a 2019 profile of Biden staffers. Williams later worked for Biden’s 2020 campaign and presidential transition team. She served as his trip director before being hired by the White House as deputy director of Oval Office operations and a special assistant to the president. Related: Ashley Williams 05/26/2025 Confused, Starving Reporters Now Desperate for Food After Killing American Journalism Ashley Williams 05/23/2025 The Walls Are Closing in on Biden's Inner Circle Ashley Williams 04/30/2012 Sudan arrests foreigners in disputed Heglig | |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
NYC hopeful Mamdani’s vow to arrest Netanyahu likely oversteps what US mayors can do |
2025-07-11 |
[IsraelTimes] US federal law largely handcuffs local authorities when it comes to cooperating with the ICC. ‘It would be akin to a publicity stunt,’ says expert If Zohran Mamdani …Shiite, “Democratic Socialist of America”, red diaper nepo-baby, naturalized Indian-American who couldn’t get into Columbia because he falsely and stupidly claimed to be African-American on his freshman application despite his father being a tenured professor there… has his way, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will find himself under arrest by New York City’s finest the next time he steps foot in the city.Mamdani, the Democratic party nominee and presumed frontrunner in the city’s mayoral race, has repeatedly said he would arrest the Israeli premier should Netanyahu visit while he is running city hall, citing an International Criminal Court warrant on war crimes charges. "As mayor, New York City would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu. This is a city that — our values are in line with international law. It’s time that our actions are also," Mamdani said in a December interview with the Zeteo outlet. But as with some of Mamdani’s other campaign promises, the candidate may be overreaching on what powers he will have as mayor — even one running the largest city in the United States. "The short answer is that this would almost certainly not happen," said Prof. David Bosco of Indiana University, Bloomington, a scholar of international law who wrote a 2014 book about the ICC. The Hague-based court, formed in 2002 to prosecute crimes against humanity, war crimes and charges of genocide, issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and then-defense minister Yoav Gallant last year on charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes in a bombshell accusation against Israel’s leadership. More than 120 countries are members of the court, curtailing travel for Netanyahu and Gallant to countries that have promised not to honor the warrants or are not signatories to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, such as Israel or the US, where Netanyahu visited this week. The court does not have the power to enforce arrests itself and relies on member states to carry out arrests so defendants can stand trial in the Hague. Mamdani has acknowledged that the US is not a party to the ICC, without explaining how he would still carry out an arrest. Addressing the ICC’s lack of jurisdiction in the US during a panel at a synagogue last month, Mamdani said, "I believe our city should be in compliance with international law." Rebecca Hamilton, a professor of international law at American University and a former lawyer with the ICC, said that, in theory, countries that are not party to the court could still carry out arrests based on ICC warrants. "The court can ask any non-state party for help with an arrest warrant, and that state can decide whether or not to do so," Hamilton said. "It is just that only states that have joined the Rome Statute are under a legal obligation to execute an ICC warrant." It is up to individual countries to decide if local officials have the authority to execute an international warrant, Hamilton added. ) US federal law prohibits municipal governments from cooperating with the court, though. The American Service-Members’ Protection Act, passed in 2002, bars local authorities from cooperating with the court or providing the ICC support. "No agency or entity of any State or local government, including any court, may cooperate with the International Criminal Court," the law says. A separate federal law prohibits imprisonment, intimidation, harassment, threats and obstruction against foreign officials, including heads of state. Imprisonment of a foreign official can result in a fine and up to three years in prison. The Trump administration is also no fan of the ICC and sanctioned the court in February to penalize it for the arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant. Netanyahu is a frequent visitor to New York City, traveling there nearly every September to attend the United Nations ...the Oyster Bay money pit... General Assembly at the UN Headquarters in Manhattan. Even though Netanyahu will be in the city, matters like international warrants remain the purview of the federal government. "Diplomatic immunity and the conduct of foreign relations are federal matters and the federal government is given wide discretion by the courts to manage foreign policy and international legal relations," Bosco said, adding that the Trump administration and Congress have both opposed the ICC warrants. Even if Mamdani wanted to put Netanyahu in cuffs for jaywalking, US law and international custom grant diplomatic immunity to members of foreign diplomatic missions, including visiting dignitaries, preventing them from being arrested or prosecuted for ordinary crimes like traffic violations. Exceptions are only made in extreme cases, such as threats to public safety or "Even if New York authorities were somehow to attempt an arrest, it would be akin to a publicity stunt that would be immediately opposed and reversed," with backing from federal courts, Bosco said. A New York City mayor does not have the executive power to make arrests, but does rely on the NYPD. If Mamdani ordered Netanyahu arrested, the order would go to the NYPD’s deputy commissioner for legal matters, said Mitch Silber, the former NYPD director of intelligence analysis and the head of the Community Security Initiative, a Jewish community security group. The deputy commissioner would review the order’s legality and advise the police commissioner on whether the arrest could be carried out. If the arrest was not deemed legal, the NYPD wouldn’t take action, said Silber, who added that he is not familiar with the relevant federal laws and could not weigh in on the ICC’s jurisdiction in New York. "The NYPD can’t take illegal acts, even if the mayor wants them to," Silber said. "If it’s an act that they’re prohibited from doing by federal law, then they’re not going to do it because it’s going to get overturned immediately." Netanyahu would also need to be extradited to the Hague to stand trial, which would require the involvement of federal authorities, like the Department of Justice or the US Marshals, Silber said. The Department of Justice declined to comment on Mamdani’s vow to arrest Netanyahu. Mamdani’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment. While countries are technically obligated by the Rome Statute, the ICC has no enforceable way to compel states not to simply ignore its arrest warrants. In April, Hungary chose not to arrest Netanyahu when he visited, despite Hungary being a member of the court at the time. Hungary later withdrew from the ICC. During his visit to Washington, DC, this week, Netanyahu said he still plans to visit New York and that he was "not concerned" about Mamdani’s pledge to arrest him if elected. "There’s enough craziness in the world, but I guess it never ends," Netanyahu said. "It’s silly in many ways because it’s just not serious." "I’ll get him out," US President Donald Trump ...His ancestors didn't own any slaves... said as Netanyahu was speaking. Trump has been vocally opposed to Mamdani, calling him a "Communist lunatic" and threatening to arrest Mamdani if he opposes federal immigration enforcement in New York City. Mamdani, a harsh critic of Israel who has identified as anti-Zionist, is the heavy favorite to win November’s general election for mayor. He swept to victory in the Democratic primary last month with a campaign centered on addressing affordability in the city, promising to raise taxes on the wealthy to fund cheaper housing and groceries while making buses and kindergartens free. Critics say he lacks the authority to see many of his ideas to fruition on his own without the support of the New York State legislature and Governor Kathy Hochul. A poll released last month found that Mamdani’s pledge to arrest Netanyahu was not popular with New Yorkers. According to the survey, 45% of New Yorkers oppose acting on the ICC warrant, while 36% support it. The remainder were undecided or did not have an opinion. On the other hand, local or federal authorities in New York could potentially take action against the ICC’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, though sanctions currently prevent him from entering the country. Khan allegedly sexually abused one of his subordinates repeatedly, including in a Manhattan hotel in 2023, according to a May report in the Wall Street Journal. Khan canceled an investigative trip to Israel and Gazoo ...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppressionand disproportionate response... and rushed out the warrants shortly after the allegations surfaced, the report said. The report suggested Khan issued the warrants to build support for himself with anti-Israel ICC member states, and forestall his accuser, who strongly supported the warrants. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office did not respond to requests for comment on whether Khan was being investigated. Khan has denied the accusations. Related: Zohran Mamdani 07/08/2025 Democrats call for violence to counter Trump agenda and tell lawmakers to prepare to 'get shot' Zohran Mamdani 07/07/2025 Explosive report: Obama was the sleeper cell, Mamdani is the detonator to collapse America Zohran Mamdani 07/05/2025 Nearly 1/3 of New York voters support Mamdani’s statements on BDS, intifada — poll |
Link |
Europe |
The European Union: No Friend of the United States, Democracy, or Free Speech |
2025-07-11 |
[AmericanThinker] The United States and the European Union (EU) are often portrayed as natural allies, bound by shared values, history, and mutual economic interests. Yet behind this facade lies the reality that the EU repeatedly acts to undermine American power, prosperity, and principles. Far from being a loyal friend, the EU is a strategic competitor, an economic rival, and a political bloc hostile to democracy and free speech. Moreover, U.S. leaders like Clinton, Obama, and Biden often aligned themselves closely with the EU and its globalist ideology, and, at least as seen from the British view, do so at the expense of our and American sovereignty, national interests, and constitutional freedoms. In doing so, these leaders facilitated not only the EU’s rise—nobody in Britain will forget Obama’s threat just before we voted to leave the rotten, corrupt EU—but also undermined the democratic foundations and free speech traditions valued by our conservative American friends. The EU is a supranational political entity with ambitions that run counter to American interests and the principles of self-governance. It is an organization that stifles democratic expression, disregards the will of the people in the member nations, and suppresses dissent. It has long used its regulatory clout to pursue policies that harm American industries, the most glaring example being the Airbus-Boeing dispute in which the EU provided illegal subsidies to Airbus, enabling it to undercut Boeing on the global stage. Despite WTO rulings condemning these subsidies, the EU has consistently prioritized protecting its own industries (mostly French and German) over fair competition. In the technology sector, the EU has waged regulatory warfare against American tech giants. Under the guise of privacy protection and consumer rights, it has implemented sweeping rules such as the General Data Protection Regulation and issued multi-billion-euro fines against U.S. companies, including Google, Amazon, and Apple. While concerns over data privacy are legitimate, the EU’s hypocritical regulatory approach is motivated by protectionism and a desire to weaken U.S. technological dominance. Beyond economics, the EU repeatedly seeks to position itself as a counterbalance to U.S. global leadership. During the 2003 Iraq War, key EU members like France and Germany led international opposition to the U.S.-led coalition, undermining American diplomatic efforts and fueling global anti-American sentiment. ...Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the EU’s trajectory is its hostility toward democracy and free speech, principles supposedly enshrined in Western political culture. While the EU lectures the world on human rights and democratic values, it has repeatedly shown disdain for democracy by ignoring or overturning referendum results and trying to change national election results. ...President Obama took Clinton’s globalist orientation to new heights. His presidency represented the most ideologically aligned American leadership the EU had ever encountered. Obama’s enthusiastic endorsement of the Paris Climate Accord, a framework largely shaped by EU priorities, exemplified his readiness to subordinate U.S. economic interests to globalist objectives by imposing burdensome environmental restrictions on American industry while giving major polluters like China and India a free pass. ...So, beneath the public declarations of partnership, the European Union has emerged as a strategic rival to the United States, a political entity hostile to democracy and free speech, and a promoter of globalist policies that erode national sovereignty. Friendship is measured not by shared platitudes but by respect for sovereignty, democracy, and liberty. By that measure, the EU is no friend of the United States, and neither were Clinton and Obama. |
Link |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
As many as six U.S. Secret Service agents have been suspended for conduct during the assassination attempt on President Trump. |
2025-07-10 |
[Breitbart] As many as six U.S. Secret Service agents have been suspended for conduct during the assassination attempt on President Trump. A U.S. Secret Service official confirmed the suspensions to ABC News, noting that they came just four days shy of the one-year anniversary on July 13. On that fateful day, the bullet fired by 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks grazed the president’s ear. Firefighter Corey Comperatore was killed in the attack, while others were injured. Following the shooting, an independent review by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determined that the U.S. Secret Service made mistakes that left the president vulnerable to assassination, per ABC News: There were many mistakes made on the day of the July assassination attempt of former President Donald Trump by the Secret Service, but an independent review by the Department of Homeland Security revealed systemic issues within the organization and found that without reforms to the agency, “another Butler can and will happen again.” Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle resigned 10 days after the shooting. A source close to the agency told ABC News that those suspended this week ranged from the supervisory level to line agent level. Related: U.S. Secret Service: 2025-06-29 Incoming Riots Or Just July 4 Prep? White House, Treasury Lined By Anti-Scale Fence U.S. Secret Service: 2025-06-19 Trump admin deploys 2K more troops to blue city for anti-ICE riots U.S. Secret Service: 2025-05-28 Secret Service Fracas Outside Obama Residence Related: Thomas Matthew Crooks 02/10/2025 Trump directs Secret Service to give him ‘every bit of information' about his attempted assassins: report Thomas Matthew Crooks 11/19/2024 ‘Antifa' Secret Service Agent threatens journalists with lawfare & censorship Thomas Matthew Crooks 11/14/2024 Secret Service agent fired for taking ex girlfriend to the Obamas' Hawaii beach house to 'have sex in Michelle's bathroom like a mile-high club' |
Link |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Trump Was Right... High-Ranking Member of Tren de Aragua Gang and Illegal Immigrant Charged in Kidnapping, Execution-Style Murders of Two Women in Chicago |
2025-07-10 |
[THEGATEWAYPUNDIT] In March, in a coordinated effort by the U.S. Marshal Service (USMS) Southeast Regional Task Force (SERFTF), USMS Great Lakes Regional Fugitive Task Force, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the reliably Democrat Chicago, aka The Windy City or Mobtown ...home of Al Capone, the Chicago Black Sox, a succession of Daleys, Barak Obama, and Rahm Emmanuel... Police Department, Venezuela ![]() ...a country in Central America that sits on an enormous pool of oil. Formerly the most prospereous country in the region, it became infested with Commies sniffing almost unlimited wealth. It turned out the wealth wasn't unlimited, the economy collapsed under the clownish Hugo Chavez, the murder rate exceeded places like Honduras and El Salvador. A significant proportion of the populace refugeed to Colombia and points south... n illegal migrant and Tren de Arugua member Ricardo Gonzales Leon, age 32, was arrested at a residence in Cobb County, Georgia. According to the US Marshals, Ricardo Gonzales chose to enter the country illegally. Gonzales and Gabriel Edison Romero are accused of kidnapping and killing two women and attempting to murder a third woman in execution-style murders in Chicago, Illinois in January. In January, Gonzalez is accused of kidnapping three female victims and taking them to an alley in Chicago, IL, where they were all shot in the head. Two victims were pronounced deceased on the scene and the surviving victim was able to escape and call 911. Gonzalez is known to be a high-ranking member of the Venezuelan street gang ''Tren De Aragua.'' Gonzales then fled to Georgia where he was later arrested in March 2025. ABC 7 carried the story. According to CWB Chicago — Gabriel Edison Romero, 29, is facing two counts of first-degree murder, one count of attempted first-degree murder, three counts of aggravated armed kidnapping, and three counts of aggravated unlawful restraint. Another man, 31-year-old Ricardo Gonzalez Leon—also a Venezuelan migrant—was charged in May with kidnapping and unlawful restraint for his alleged role in the crime. Related: Cobb County: 2025-07-09 Distressing moment whimpering toddler siblings are rescued from roasting 117f car by hero deputies Cobb County: 2025-03-22 Cobb County mother of five that was strangled and left in a bush was murdered by an ILLEGAL ALIEN from Honduras Cobb County: 2025-03-10 Trump withdraws slew of Biden-era lawsuits tied to abortion, racial discrimination, financial regs and more |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
By Halting The Federal Judiciary's Left Turn, Trump Has Saved America |
2025-07-10 |
[AMERICANTHINKER] What Donald Trump ...The Hero of Butler, Pennsylvania... has achieved in the first six months of his non-sequential second term borders on the unprecedented. The most lasting and impactful accomplishment will be Trump's ongoing victories in permanently reining in a rogue and increasingly radicalized federal judiciary. His electoral victory in 2024 and uncompromising battles with the judiciary have rescued the United States from an irreversible decline and fall. Over the past 70 years, the federal judiciary has increasingly assumed the extra-constitutional role of arbitrarily setting the boundaries of congressional and presidential authority. This has been an evolutionary process that reflected the American left's long-term strategy of appointing collectivist judges to the federal judiciary. All Marxist-inspired despots of the twentieth century understood that party or state control over the judiciary is a key factor in successfully transforming a nation into a one-party socialist or communist state. This process was dramatically accelerated in the United States after Barack Obama I am the change that you seek... became president. During his two terms in office, he and the Democrat party, per the Marxist blueprint, were singularly focused on radicalizing the federal judiciary. This single-minded determination culminated in Obama and his minion, Joe The Big GuyBiden ...46th president of the U.S. Sleazy Dem machine politician, paterfamilias of the Biden Crime Family... , appointing vast numbers of radical left-wing judges during their combined twelve years in office. The unabashed and unconstitutional lawfare directed at Donald Trump and the January 6th protestors was a manifestation of their success. Since the beginning of Trump's second term, dozens of Obama-Biden district court judges have unconstitutionally interjected themselves in Trump's lawful exercise of executive power, issuing an unheard 45-plus national injunctions in less than six months. From the Constitution's ratification until the dawn of the Twentieth Century, courts did not issue any nationwide injunctions. Beginning in 1900 and spanning 21 presidencies, courts issued 170 nationwide injunctions. Of those, 112—or 65% of all national injunctions over 249 years—came during the four years of Trump's first term and six months of his second. By comparison, per the Harvard Law Review, the last Republican president, George W. Bush, experienced just six nationwide injunctions over eight years. It is not a coincidence that this avalanche of injunctions began after the Obama presidency, during which he appointed hundreds of radical district judges. There are currently 631 serving District Court judges in 94 districts, and Obama and Biden appointed over 60% of them. This makes it easy to find a judge sympathetic to the Marxist-inspired Democrat party and willing to issue unconstitutional nationwide injunctions or conduct rigged trials against political adversaries. After experiencing a record 64 nationwide injunctions during his first term, surviving the egregious travesty that was unconstitutional lawfare directed at him, and observing the appalling and blatant political persecution of the January 6th protestors, Trump came into office in 2025 single-mindedly determined to take on this Marxist monolith. Trump knew that the Democrats ![]() white people, white supremacy, whiteanything but paint, you're listening to a Democrat. Ask him/her/it to reimagine something for you; they do that a lot, though not well. They can hear a dog whistle a mile or two away. They invented the spoils system and Tammany Hall, and inspired the addition of the word (Thomas) Nastyto the English language. They want to stop continental drift and repeal the law of unintended side effects... ' strategy was to derail his agenda. During the four years of his second term, they intended to file lawsuits continuously with their dependable sycophants in the judiciary. These judges would then issue an unending avalanche of judgments, restraining orders, and national injunctions that would freeze the Trump agenda. They theorized that Trump would either openly defy lower court orders, thus alienating the Supreme Court and becoming susceptible to accusations that he was a fascist ...anybody you disagree with, damn them... -inspired dictator, or he would not be able to aggressively marshal the legal team and strategy to fight continuous battles in innumerable district courts, the circuit courts, and ultimately the Supreme Court. Trump, however, knew what was coming. Before his inauguration, he assembled an experienced and loyal legal team that was later installed in the Justice Department and the White House Counsel's office, expressly to contest the anticipated lawsuits. Upon assuming office on January 20, 2025, Trump turned the tables on his feckless and fatuous adversaries by immediately issuing a massive number of executive orders. The Democrat party strategy was immediately exposed to the public as they and their fellow travelers predictably filed 328 lawsuits in the first 100 days of his presidency, stretching their credibility and resources to the limit. Most importantly, Trump wisely allowed the processes to play out and did not traffic in unhinged accusations or hyperbole when reacting to the inane (and insane) lower court rulings and injunctions. However, some men learn by reading. A few learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves... he made clear he would never back off in contesting every judgment, restraining order, and injunction. Lastly, he never threatened to ignore any court order, regardless of its merits or constitutionality. These overall tactics caught the Democrat machine by surprise as they assumed Trump was incapable of restraint. Trump's willingness to respect the separation of powers was not lost on the Supreme Court Justices, who would be the final arbiters of the validity of many rulings, especially the constitutionality of nationwide injunctions. As a result, Trump has amassed an unexpected winning streak, not only before the Supreme Court but in many lower courts, too. This streak included the monumental win in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which saw the Supreme Court permanently and dramatically limit district courts' power to issue nationwide injunctions. This effectively eliminates a major tool Democrats use to thwart their political opposition and abet their transforming America. |
Link |