Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Iran Trying To Start A Fight, With Iraq? |
2009-12-18 |
![]() Nadhmi said that Iranian forces had taken control of the well, dug a trench around it, deployed armoured vehicles, and raised the Iranian flag over the well. The officer's claims could not immediately be independently verified. When, in June 2009, Iraq opened bidding on the rights to develop its oil fields to foreign companies, the government said it would create a state-run oil company to boost production from "neglected" Maysan province. The largely marshy region, some 450 kilometres south of Baghdad, currently produces between 100,000 and 110,000 barrels of oil per day (bpd), the government said in June, with the aim to boost production from the province to more than 300,000 bpd in five years. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | ||||||
Obama bagman to jail over $3.5m payment by British tycoon | ||||||
2008-02-01 | ||||||
![]()
The Times has, however, discovered state documents in Illinois recording that Fintrade Services, a Panamanian company, lent money to Mr Obamas fundraiser in May 2005. Fintrades directors include Ibtisam Auchi, the name of Mr Auchis wife. Mr Auchis spokespeople declined to respond to a question about whether he was linked to this business. Mr Rezko, to be tried for corruption this month, had his bail revoked on Monday after he disobeyed a courts instructions to keep it informed of changes to his finances. Prosecutors feared that he could try to flee abroad. The property developer has been condemned by Hillary Clinton as a slum landlord.
Mr Auchi has attracted attention at Westminster because of his closeness to politicians and the Establishment. He says that his brother was executed by Saddam Husseins regime. His business partners in Britain have included Lord Steel of Aikwood, the former Liberal leader, and Keith Vaz, the Labour MP and Home Affairs Committee chairman. On the 20th anniversary of his business in 1999, Mr Auchi received a greeting card signed by 130 politicians, including Tony Blair, William Hague and Charles Kennedy, who were then leaders of their respective parties. Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat MP, went on to table parliamentary questions asking why the Blair Government appeared slow to respond to a French extradition request. Mr Lamb said last night: Its a matter of public interest to understand why the payments were made. This deserves thorough investigation. Mr Auchi founded GMH in 1979, a year before he left Iraq. He says that he did business with his native country when it was considered a friend of the West but ceased to trade with Saddams regime once sanctions were imposed after the invasion of Kuwait. US prosecution documents recall Mr Auchis suspended jail sentence and 2 million fine for corruption in France five years ago. Defence lawyers said that Mr Auchi lent the $3.5 million for legal and family expenses. Most of the money had gone directly to law firms and there had been no attempt to flee. While the Government attempts to besmirch Mr Auchis character, they said, he is one of Britains wealthiest men, has been a guest at the White House and met with two of the last three presidents, was Co-Chair of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, is President of the Anglo-Arab Organisation, and has received numerous awards and honorary positions from heads of state, including Queen Elizabeth II, Pope John Paul II, and King Abdullah II of Jordan.
| ||||||
Link |
Iraq |
Saddam's Swords of "Victory" Surrender to Wrecking Ball |
2007-02-21 |
![]() The Iraqi government has yet to issue an official statement about the dismantling of the swords, but the effort is clearly already underway. Khadimi says Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki made the decision to bring down the monument last week in coordination with a governmental body named the Committee for Removing Symbols of the Saddam Era. The idea of erasing the symbols of the former regime completely undercuts the mission of organizations like the Iraq Memory Foundation, which had planned to build a huge museum on the site. Representatives from the organization have sent letters of protest to the Iraqi government as well as UNESCO. "We need to use these two swords as proof to further generations to show what happened to Iraqi people," says Khadimi. Saddam constructed the monument to symbolize what he saw as a definitive victory in the brutal war with Iran during the 1980s. The pair of crossed swords was officially unveiled in 1989, but Saddam started construction on the monument well before the war with Iran was even finished. He pulled out all the stops. The swords cross approximately 130 feet in the air and are reportedly built from melted-down tanks and other hardware used by the Iraqi military. The hands gripping the swords, approximately 20 feet high, are bronze replicas of Saddam's own fists. The Butcher of Baghdad added a gruesome final touch: thousands of helmets from Iranian soldiers allegedly killed in the war dangle from nets attached to the fists. Other helmets are embedded in concrete at the base of the monument, intended as speed bumps. These days, the monument sits in the heart of the Green Zone. Since the fall of the regime, visitors have left their mark with graffiti. One scrawl in black pen on a green Iranian helmet reads, "I [heart] Iraq." Taking a photo beneath the crossed swords is a must-do for visitors of all stripes. And Tuesday was no exception. Humvees and SUVs pulled up for a photo op at sunset as word spread that the monument was being taken down. Some posed beneath the swords, others pulled out digital cameras to preserve the moment. A handful of souvenir hunters were stopped by Green Zone police as they tried to haul off a half dozen helmets. Like Saddam's bungled execution, a hasty decision to dismantle the monument could inflame sectarian tensions. Many Sunnis, whether they supported Saddam or not, will likely interpret the move as a direct snub by a Shiite-led government. Not exactly the kind of message the government should send while enforcing a new security plan. "The timing doesn't serve anything," says Wamidh Nadhmi, a political science professor at Baghdad University. "This would be a defeat for the whole idea of reconciliation." |
Link |
Iraq | ||
In Iraq, US influence wanes as full-scale civil war looms | ||
2006-03-20 | ||
![]() One factor they are considering is the changing American role. Despite the continued presence of 130,000 American troops, and arm-twisting efforts by US diplomats to forge a unity government, Iraq's democratic political process is, by definition, giving the US even less leverage to shape this broken nation's future. "The majority of Iraqis are now against this occupation, whether they are Sunni, Shiite or Kurd," says Wamidh Omar Nadhmi, a political scientist who heads a Sunni-led group called the Foundation Conference. "But those in government positions are trying to unleash a campaign of suppression, to take advantage [of the violence], to dominate. Remind me why the Kurds would be upset that Shiia and Sunni are killing each other, now they get what they've wanted all along, their own country. "Now we are told: '[The Americans] are not going to take sides,' " says Mr. Nadhmi, referring to remarks by US officials last week that Iraqi forces must handle sectarian strife on their own. "But if it comes to civil war, and the US does not try to keep order, as the controlling power, then why do they stay in Iraq?" Tens of thousands of Iraqis have died in a maelstrom of insurgent violence. Many hundreds more are dying in sectarian killings that flared a month ago, after the destruction of the gold-domed Shiite shrine at Samarra. The grim reality today - and the perception among so many Iraqis that the US is responsible - could not be in sharper contrast from the faith Iraqis once held, that the all-powerful Americans would solve their problems. "It is unfortunate that we are in civil war," Iyad Allawi, Iraq's former prime minister, told BBC news Sunday. "We are losing each day an average of 50 to 60 people throughout the country, if not more. If this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war is." Comments? Any Civil war naysayers? That view is hotly disputed by US officials and commanders, but is on the lips of many Iraqis here. "Maybe we have not reached a point of no return yet, but we are moving towards this point," said Mr. Allawi. But escaping that vortex will not be easy, analysts say. "The new government is incapable of ruling the street without the American presence," says Ahmad al-Rikabi, head of the popular Radio Dijla in Baghdad. "If [US forces] left Iraq, the future of the country would be in the hands of the militias. This is the case already, but we still have some hope [the US] will keep some balance." The stakes could not be higher, for Iraq or for the region, President Bush said last week. "The battle lines in Iraq are clearly drawn for the world to see, and there is no middle ground," he said. "The enemy will emerge from Iraq one of two ways: Emboldened or defeated." US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad has been pushing Iraqi leaders to form a unity government, that would mend rifts inside the main Shiite bloc, and ensure a significant role for the minority Sunni Arabs. At the formal opening of parliament last Thursday, he had a place in the handshaking line alongside Iraqi political leaders. But diplomats close to the talks say not all Iraqi leaders welcome the forceful US intervention. Both Washington and Tehran have signaled that they could commence talks to solve the crisis, in what would be the first publicly acknowledged contact since Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution. "Saddam Hussein is still ruling Iraq - he may be behind bars, but he created the mentality we have today," says Mr. Rikabi. "Saddam has to be executed. It's not revenge, and won't be satisfying for his victims. But it will be good for Shiite and Kurds, and even Sunnis, to help them focus on their leaders." "The symbols of the past are still in front of our eyes; we're still living in the past, and must get rid of the past," says Rikabi. Sectarian violence grows But getting rid of the past means getting rid of business as usual, and that means coming to terms with the increasingly pervasive Shiite militia influence in Iraq's security forces, which are accused of abuse, torture, and operating death squads that target Sunni Arabs. They also reportedly let other Shiite militias, like the Mahdi Army of anti-US cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, operate with impunity.n"The first thing is to change the minister," says a Shiite police colonel who asked not to be named, referring to Bayan Jabr, the minister of interior and a former Badr militia leader. "We need an independent one." Ambassador Khalilzad has pushed for such a change. Shiites are targeted almost exclusively by the Sunni Arab extremist insurgents. But Sunni Arabs say they see little change on the ground. "Nobody obliged the minister of interior to resign - he should be arrested," says Mr. Wamidh. "There have been no actual steps in favor of the Sunnis, but accumulated attacks against them." The daily toll was again evident Sunday, as hundreds of thousands of Shiite pilgrims made their way by foot to the sacred city of Karbala, south of Baghdad, to mark Monday the death of Hussein, the grandson of the prophet Muhammad. Pilgrims have been subject to drive-by shootings and bombings by Sunni Arab extremists that have killed four. A mortar landed near the shrine of Imam Hussein but caused no harm. An extra 700 American troops were deployed from Kuwait, to boost security during the religious event. In Baghdad four bodies killed execution-style were found Sunday; 22 were found, by one count, the day before. Whatever the result of the political wrangling, many Iraqis say it will not be enough to correct three years of US mistakes - from disbanding Saddam Hussein's 400,000-strong army with the stroke of a pen, to a vigorous de-Baathification plan that swept capable bureaucrats from government - that helped fuel insurgency.
Relying on such politicians also risks the endgame for the US, which wants a unity government to take control - and control Iraqi security forces - so American forces can begin withdrawing. "I can see their dilemma," says Nadhmi. "[President George] Bush is triumphant about democracy in Iraq, but if he tries to intervene and put in a prime minister of his own, it would be a contradiction." Still, options are limited for the US - both military and political - which last week accused Iran of "meddling" in Iraqi affairs, and claimed that Iran had helped insurgents improve their explosive techniques. The US military's "kinetic or muscular approach has failed to produce sustained success," says a report last month from the International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS), noting that insurgent attacks at a tempo of 75 per day against coalition forces show "no signs of diminishing." It notes that several key non-Al Qaeda insurgent groups secretly agreed to a 21-point "principles for dialogue" with US forces last December. Such talks have not taken place in part, the IISS says, because "the very logic of elections, bringing to power an indigenous government with a mandate, has directly reduced US influence over Iraqi politics." This has been clear for months to many in Iraq, who look back with nostalgia on Saddam Hussein, in the way that older Russians often crave the order once instilled upon the Soviet Union by Josef Stalin. "People were executed in Saddam's days, but it is the same today," says Rikabi, of Radio Dijla. "Then it was behind high walls, now it is by this or that militia. "Before, people respected the traffic police, there was an organization, a state; today we have the smell, the shadow of a government," says Rikabi. "Before, people would go to restaurants until 2 a.m.; today their lives are full of fear.
"Then, we had one Saddam Hussein," concludes Rikabi. "Today, we have many Saddam Husseins." | ||
Link |
Iraq |
Allawi gathers allies to fight Iraq election |
2005-10-19 |
![]() "Allawi is trying to put everybody together to face the government," said political analyst Wamidh Nadhmi. "People are already annoyed with the government because of its sectarian structure and because it failed to provide electricity, water and unemployment. Its problems are many." In the strongest indication yet that Allawi will run in December elections, he hosted a gathering on Monday of 850 politicians from across Iraq's sectarian, ethnic and political divides for what he called a "reconciliation conference." |
Link |
Iraq |
Iraqi Billionaire Has Stake in Bank That Holds Oil-for-Food Funds |
2003-04-30 |
EFL - NYTimes, reg req, yada, yada One of the largest private shareholders in BNP Paribas, the French bank that holds more than $13 billion in Iraqi oil funds administered through the United Nation's oil-for-food program, is an Iraqi-born businessman who once helped to arm Iraq in the 1980's and brokered business deals with Saddam Hussein's government, according to public records and interviews. Tap, tap, surprise meter still not working The involvement of the businessman, the British billionaire Nadhmi Auchi, raises questions about how carefully the United Nations has vetted the bank in its continuing role as repository of oil-for-food funds. Although the United Nations pressed Iraq to allow banks other than BNP Paribas to be the primary repository for billions of dollars in oil revenue, Iraq successfully insisted that BNP Paribas remain the sole caretaker of the program's escrow account. Gee, I wonder why? There is no evidence that Mr. Auchi, or BNP Paribas itself, engaged in any irregularities in the handling of the Iraqi funds. Not yet, anyway A United Nations spokesman said it was now impossible to determine why Iraq insisted on BNP Paribas, other than that the Iraqis had "confidence and trust" in the bank. Now there's a red flag "It's moved on with the winds of history," said the spokesman, Ian Steele. He said the United Nations had no knowledge of Mr. Auchi or his investment in BNP Paribas. "Who?" The United Nations gained nominal control of Iraqi oil profits through the oil-for-food program. But critics in the United States government and elsewhere say the United Nations has not policed the program effectively, and that some funds were diverted by Iraqi officials. The United Nations has defended its stewardship of the program. Mr. Auchi first became involved with Paribas, the predecessor to BNP Paribas, in the 1970's. He also played a central role in the 2000 merger of Paribas and BNP, helping to steer Paribas away from a merger with a rival concern. In 1996, according to European news accounts, Belgium's ambassador to Luxembourg charged that Banque Continentale du Luxembourg, a bank that Mr. Auchi and Paribas jointly controlled until 1994, had handled personal accounts for Mr. Hussein. Should still be records, if they were legit. Earlier this month, Mr. Auchi was arrested and released on bail in London pending a court hearing next week on fraud charges involving the French oil giant TotalFinaElf. French prosecutors have accused Mr. Auchi of helping channel bribes to Total's executives, a charge Mr. Corker denies. Mr. Auchi was born in Iraq in 1937 and lived there until 1981, his lawyer said. He became a British citizen in 1981. Mr. Auchi sold Italian naval vessels to Mr. Hussein's government in the early 1980's. In 1993, an Italian banker told Italian investigators that in 1987, Mr. Auchi had helped an engineering concern secure a contract for an oil pipeline from Iraq to Saudi Arabia by bribing members of the Hussein government, according to a transcript of a police interrogation. I'd say this guy may have some idea where all that cash Sammy had stuffed in his sock drawer came from. |
Link |
Middle East |
Iraqi Tribes pose wild card if U.S. fights Saddam |
2003-01-05 |
Right off the bat, can we stop using the "if" stuff? Its insulting. By Neil MacFarquhar The New York Times MOSUL, Iraq â Sheik Talal Salim al-Khalidi, the portly chieftain of the Bani Khalid tribe, stomped through a farming hamlet in his fief on the broad, flat Mosul plains, gloating that the mud oozing underfoot heralded an auspicious sign in the face of a possible U.S. attack. "God is fair. Whenever we face some kind of oppression, he compensates us with something else," proclaimed the sheik, wearing a headdress, a gray suit and a ground-length flowing gray wool cloak edged in gold. Three men armed with Kalashnikovs and one with a machine gun dogged his every footstep. When I first read this, I started humming the theme to "The Beverly Hillbillys" (and up from the ground comes a bubblin crude....... "The same thing happened in December 1998, when the Americans were bombing us; we had heavy rains that year," he said, recalling a bountiful harvest. Well dang buddy, we should come by more often then! Hows your palm pilot look for say around next month or so? Intensely devout, armed and nationalistic, the storied tribes of Iraq have played a pivotal role in controlling the country under the Ottomans, the British, the monarchy and especially Saddam Hussein. They have remained the ultimate swing voters in the brutal politics of the Middle East. Iraq's tribes are under increased scrutiny as the Bush administration casts about for some credible force that can help it oust Saddam. The country is home to about 150 major tribes, which break down into about 2,000 smaller clans. The largest number more than 1 million people, the smallest a few thousand. Of the larger groups, roughly 30 to 35 are believed to have a significant role in controlling Iraq. The tribal formula worked for the United States in Afghanistan last year. Cash payments persuaded chieftains to abandon the Taliban. There has been talk of similar payments in Iraq, but few expect it to be quite so simple here. Iraqi opposition figures interviewed in London say the United States is working hard to forge some sort of tribal link, meeting with chieftains in neighboring countries to see if they can influence their Iraqi cousins. All major tribes in Iraq have related branches in Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the other Gulf states and Turkey, although under Quranic prescriptions, loyalty to the national tribal leader trumps relations across borders, no matter how extensive. "We can talk about the father of the father of the father and all their fathers back 1,600 years," Talal said. But ask us what the difference is between AC and DC electricity, and we'll look at you like the RCA victor dog. The question hanging over the tribes now is how deep their professed loyalty runs. They could become a nightmare for any U.S. force penetrating Iraq, a patriotic guerrilla army spread throughout the country. Talal, echoing other tribal chiefs, said he had placed a request with the local Baath Party leader in Mosul for heavier arms, like rocket-propelled grenades, anti-aircraft guns and anti-tank weapons to help fight the Americans, but he has yet to receive a response. Saddam has worked diligently in recent years to woo the tribes, dispensing cash, cars, arms, schools and other bounty to assure their loyalty. At the same time, those who failed to kowtow, or worse, plotted rebellions, have been brutally suppressed, their chiefs killed, replaced or driven into exile, their houses destroyed, their crops burned. Opposition figures in London report that Saddam summoned the chiefs of the southern tribes to Baghdad three months ago and demanded that they vow not to repeat the 1991 uprisings against him that followed the Persian Gulf War. Now, think about that for a second. Since when does a supreme dictator demand a "vow"? The tribes could also be waiting for the right moment to rise up against the Baghdad government, though if they are, they are understandably not advertising it. Hello My name is Mr. Solo from the CIA. My friends in the northern alliance said you might be looking to increase your holdings and position here in Boogerglop Iraq. If you like you are more than welcome to call them and check my references, Im sure they will give a glowing account of how we were able to work together during the recent unpleasantness. "You cannot ignore them because they are an important element of the government," said one Western envoy in Baghdad. "But you cannot expect the tribes alone to change the regime in Iraq." The tribes slice across the society along a different axis than the traditional Iraqi divisions between Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds, with some tribes including Sunni, Shiite and even Christian members. Pride of place naturally goes to Saddam Hussein's tribe, the Tikritis, whose members fill many senior government positions, as well as important posts in security organizations and the presidential guard. Tikritis = Taliban. First up against the wall when the revolution comes. The Baath Party, which came to power in 1968 with Saddam as a vice president, painted the tribes as outdated, with loyalty owed to the state and the president rather than to the tribe and the chief. Even the use of tribal names was banned. (Another explanation for the policy was that it was to disguise the predominance of Saddam's tribe in the government.) Things began changing in the 1980s, when the government needed soldiers for the fight against Iran, and the tribes obliged. But it was after Baghdad lost control of large swaths of the country in the years after the Gulf War that Saddam truly resurrected the role of the tribes. He reached out to the leaders, allocating them specific sectors of the country to supervise in exchange for more autonomy over tribal affairs. Talal, who says his tribe has about 100,000 armed men all over Iraq, is proud of the tribe's various roles in the 1990s. It was assigned a 72-mile section of highway to protect at night in southern Iraq, for example. "It became a duty to prove our loyalty to the president," said the sheik, who has been a member of the rubber-stamp Iraqi parliament for the past three years. Of course by way of compensation for his efforts Talal can also now use the same highway to smuggle guns drugs and satellite TV units for sale on the bagdhad black market. "The tribal leaders were very happy that their old role was to be returned," said Wamidh Nadhmi, a political science professor at Baghdad University. "They were good at protecting roads, delivering water and sorting out the problems the government can't. I don't think they have the strength they did in the early days of Iraq, though, when they outgunned and outnumbered the Iraqi army." Insert boilerplate answer Here: On a visit to Naharat Nimrud, a tribal hamlet, Talal listed the benefits accrued from the president. Right off the main road sits the Saddam Mosque, then a new school and an infirmary, all paid for by Saddam. When crops of wheat and barley fail, the president regularly forgives all government loans for seeds and fertilizer. Various sheiks scoff at the idea that U.S. money might persuade crucial tribes to switch sides. Sheik Ahmed Mohiedin Zangana, the leader of a small Kurdish tribe opposed to his U.S.-allied brethren in the north, noted that he had already assigned members of his tribe positions to take up around the city of Mosul and elsewhere in the event of an attack, although he, too, awaits heavier weapons. "I have my specific plans to distribute members of the tribe if paratroopers land," he said. "Each sniper knows his special assignment." To provide a moving target for the 101st airborne, most likely. /SPAN> Talal described the likely resistance in religious terms. "We protect the nation's land, and we would consider killing Americans a jihad in the service of God if they come here as aggressors," he said. "The Quran says an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, so when anybody kills us, we will kill them." The British experience during World War I is a cautionary history cited often in Iraq these days. Expecting a warm tribal welcome when they marched into Iraq to toss out the Ottomans, the British instead were met with hostile tribes united to fiercely fight them. "The graveyards of the British are still in Iraq," Talal said. Yes, because unlike you yabbos, they managed to get out of town now and then.... |
Link |