Home Front: Politix | |
Apple Trees on Mars and Peace in Ukraine: What Trump Spoke to Congress About for an Hour and a Half | |
2025-03-06 | |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Malek Dudakov [REGNUM] US President Donald Trump's first address to Congress since his re-election highlighted the deep divisions in American politics that have persisted since the recent election. ![]() For the US president, this is a traditional annual speech in which he reports on his successes in office and outlines priorities for the coming year. During Trump's first term, his addresses to the nation and Congress always caused fits of madness among Democrats. His speech in his second term was no exception. The main leitmotif of the address was the concept of the "American dream that cannot be stopped." Trump has only been in office for a month and a half, but he has already boasted of his first achievements, such as saving billions of dollars for the budget after cleaning up the state apparatus and cutting bureaucracy. But the president mostly focused on America's problems and what needs to be done in 2025, which clearly promises to be a difficult year. Trump gave one of the longest speeches in history, lasting more than an hour and a half; usually, presidents speak in Congress for an hour on average. He focused on the problem of illegal immigration and invited relatives of victims killed by illegal immigrants to the Capitol. Trump also promised to fight crime, destroy terrorists and revive the US Armed Forces, which have been stuck in a long-term crisis due to a decline in the number of people willing to serve and problems in the military-industrial complex. The speech mostly concerned domestic politics, which primarily concerns ordinary Americans. But there were also references to foreign policy topics. Trump reported progress in the negotiation process with Russia. It is not for nothing that even before the speech, insider information about the development of plans to ease sanctions against Russia began to appear in the American press. If the political will appears, then it is not difficult to do this - the president will not even need congressional approval to abandon the restrictions. The rare earths deal with Ukraine remains in limbo, with Trump vowing to prevent the war from continuing for another five years. The pressure on the current Kiev government has increased sharply after the recent spat with Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House. The US has completely curtailed programs for sending weapons under old contracts concluded during the Joe Biden era. The Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) have also started having problems receiving intelligence data - both from the US and from Britain. The aid freeze will affect contracts worth $30 billion at a time, primarily for Patriot and NASAMS air defense missiles, artillery ammunition, HIMARS missile systems, and anti-tank weapons. This is a very painful blow for Kyiv, because they will not be able to get the same missiles anywhere else. The Europeans are ready to supply a small number of shells, but they themselves have very serious problems with air defense. And without satellite reconnaissance, using high-precision weapons will become completely problematic. For Trump, closing the trenches is a lever of pressure on Zelensky's office. If the situation on the front line for the Ukrainian Armed Forces deteriorates sharply, then the situation inside Ukraine will also destabilize. Then the probability of a scenario of a change of power, Zelensky's resignation and elections increases sharply. Someone more capable of reaching an agreement than Zelensky may win the elections. If the Kyiv authorities back down in their standoff with Trump, they will likely be forced into an even more unfavorable rare earth deal. In the meantime, Zelensky is threatened not only with a halt in aid from the United States, but also with anti-corruption investigations, which have been announced by Trump's allies. The president also announced during his speech his desire to reach an agreement on the situation in Ukraine as quickly as possible and switch to other areas. Among them are the return of the Panama Canal to US control, the annexation of Greenland, and even the planting of the American flag on Mars when the colonization of the planet begins. The speech provoked an unusually emotional reaction among Democrats. Some of them boycotted the event, while others demonstratively walked out right during the speech. Democrats brought many signs with which they staged impromptu pickets and tried to interrupt Trump. The incidents of his first term, when Democrats also constantly went into hysterics during speeches, were repeated. In 2020, Nancy Pelosi, then Speaker of the House of Representatives, even at one point stood behind Trump and began to demonstratively tear up pages of his speech. Typically, the party that opposes the current government records an alternative address to the nation. The Democrats have now chosen Michigan Senator Elise Slotkin for this. She devoted most of her speech to criticizing not even Trump, but rather Elon Musk. She also made the usual cliches about Ronald Reagan “turning in his grave,” who would supposedly be shocked by Trump’s behavior in the context of the Ukrainian conflict.
Moreover, Reagan himself was often criticized by many neocons in Washington, for example, for his meetings with Mikhail Gorbachev, and accused of capitulating to the Soviet Union. Similar rhetoric is now being used by hawks against Trump in connection with the start of negotiations with Russia. Senator Slotkin's speech ended mid-sentence, and this became a good illustration of the current state of the Democratic Party. Hysteria and full-throated vilification of Trump and Musk is the maximum they are capable of now. But there are obvious problems with developing an alternative agenda. Democrats can only hope that Trump himself will make mistakes and that this will hurt his ratings. In the meantime, all they can do is pull off circus acts like what happened in Congress. In the run-up to the US President's speech, there were insider reports that he might make some kind of sensation. For example, announce his withdrawal from NATO. However, such radical statements were not made. However, the general course of the new policy, aimed at a serious shake-up of all US institutions and alliances with allies, does not change in any way. To do this, it is not at all necessary to leave the North Atlantic Alliance. It is possible to reduce cooperation within NATO to a minimum - and, say, completely abandon the organization of joint exercises and teamwork. This strategy, which has been dubbed in the United States as a transition to a “sleeping NATO,” has long been discussed among Republican foreign policy strategists. It could also become one of the points that Trump's team will offer to the Russian side during the negotiations. After all, the endless exercises near Russia's western borders and the build-up of military forces in Eastern European countries have only escalated the situation in recent years and eventually led to an open conflict. Such plans by Trump's team are causing hysteria among European hawks, but their opinion is of no interest to anyone in the White House. There they are betting on the further growth of isolationist sentiments in American society. Participation in the Ukrainian conflict and European affairs is already becoming unpopular in the US: 70-80% of Americans are in favor of negotiations with Moscow and de-escalation in Ukraine. Attitudes toward Russia have improved significantly among the Republican electorate, especially its younger part, who did not live through the Cold War. And Democrats' hopes that Trump will discredit himself with his conciliatory policies may ultimately prove futile. | |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
'Everything's in the trash.' Lavrov found reasons for the reincarnation of the Cold War |
2024-12-08 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. He ain't wrong... by Evgeniya Kondakova [REGNUM] On December 5–6, the OSCE Foreign Ministers' Council meeting was held in Malta. The event takes place every year, but this one was special for several reasons: this was the first visit of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to the EU in three years (since the OSCE meeting in Stockholm in 2021), and for the first time since the meeting, representatives of the Russian Federation and Ukraine were present at the OSCE venue. ![]() In 2022, Poland, as the country holding the presidency of the Organization, did not send an invitation to Russia, and in 2023, the Ukrainian delegation boycotted the meeting in North Macedonia due to Lavrov’s arrival. However, this time it was not without scandal. On the eve of the event, Malta "due to circumstances beyond its control" cancelled the visa of the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova, as it became known later, at the insistence of the Baltic countries. The situation is certainly outrageous, as Lavrov said during the meeting in Valletta, but Maria Vladimirovna did not waste time and instead of going to Malta, she went to a concert in the Kremlin Palace, and then went to Yekaterinburg for the opening ceremony of the monument to Emperor Alexander I, who defeated Napoleon and liberated Europe. It turned out very symbolic. "But she could have quietly sat on a chair in the OSCE Foreign Ministers' Council meeting room and sympathetically empathized with the comatose state of the Helsinki Final Act. But, as they say, you asked for it - let's recall today the glory of the heroes of the Patriotic War of 1812 and the beaten Napoleon," Zakharova wrote on her Telegram channel. The organizers seated the delegations in alphabetical order, but for some reason the USA and Germany were next to each other, allowing US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and German Minister Annalena Baerbock to while away the time by talking. The head of the State Department was separated from Lavrov by 14 seats, and from Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga by 2. According to journalists present in the room, he caught every gesture and glance of his American colleague, and pointedly did not look in the direction of the Russian minister, who was sitting 11 chairs away. Russian diplomats went to the event expecting to openly discuss the accumulated problems and ways to solve them on fundamentally new terms, respecting the interests of all participating states. However, as before, Western countries used this platform for their own interests, which, in fact, led to the current institutional crisis of the OSCE. As Maltese Foreign Minister Ian Borch was about to deliver his speech, there was a noise. It was just rain, the host reassured his colleagues, calling it a good omen. The same inclement weather had hit Malta on December 2–3, 1989, during the meeting between Mikhail Gorbachev and George H. W. Bush, which marked the end of the Cold War. Lavrov would later mention that historic event in his speech. "Times have changed significantly, but our relations are once again defined by geopolitical rivalries, and relations between OSCE members are facing serious tests in the area of peace and security. This is our third meeting since the beginning of Russia's war against Ukraine, which poses a systemic threat to European security," Borc said. Thus, he set the tone for further speeches. And so, the first of the OSCE member states to speak was Ukraine. In his speech, Sybiga asked the West for even more air defense systems and revealed Kiev's "peace plan": Russia should leave Ukraine, and then Ukraine would be accepted into NATO. However, these words of the head of the MFA clearly contradict what Volodymyr Zelensky said just a few days ago : Ukraine is ready to stop military actions along the front line, giving up claims to lost territories, in exchange for membership in the Alliance. There is a discrepancy. A dozen ministers who spoke after Sybiga used roughly the same rhetoric, focusing on the Ukrainian theme instead of touching on issues of global security and the institutional crisis of the OSCE. What can we talk about if Borch, a representative of the country chairing the OSCE, did exactly the same thing? Blinken, whose term ends in six weeks, was the most aggressive. The US secretary of state accused Russia of pursuing an “imperial project” based on the idea of “wiping Ukraine off the map” and of trying to destroy the founding principles of the OSCE, enshrined in the Helsinki Act of 1975. Lavrov, when it was his turn, parried these accusations of his American colleague. But first the Ukrainian delegation could not resist a prank: Sibiga, and after him the heads of the Polish and Czech Foreign Ministries, demonstratively left the hall as soon as the Russian minister began his speech. He noted that the Helsinki Act of 1975 put the principle of indivisibility of security at the forefront - no one strengthens their security at the expense of others, no country or organization claims dominance in Europe. However, there is a gulf between that Security Conference 49 years ago and today. Life has shown that for NATO and the EU, the Helsinki principles are "an empty piece of paper," the minister added. In 1999, the North Atlantic Alliance committed aggression against Yugoslavia, dismembering the state in the center of Europe, and now it has ignited the Ukrainian conflict to suppress Russia. "The US and its allies have thrown all this on the scrap heap. The question is: for what purpose? The answer is obvious to us: to please the desire to return NATO to the political forefront. After the Afghan disgrace, a new "unifying enemy" was needed. The result is a reincarnation of the Cold War, only now with a much greater risk of it going into a "hot" phase," Lavrov warned. Later, commenting on these words of the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic admitted that he was concerned about the further escalation of the conflict in Eastern Europe, and expressed hope that politicians would have enough common sense and wisdom to avoid this. Although some actors in Europe and the world are not ready for dialogue with each other to solve the accumulated problems. Lavrov had to return to this topic when responding to criticism from his German colleague. Addressing the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Baerbock said: "You can deceive yourself in some ways, but you cannot deceive us - 1.3 billion people in Europe." However, she made a gross mistake: the population of Europe is almost half as much - about 745 million people. In the quote from the minister, published on the social network X, the German Foreign Ministry corrected the error, indicating that it was not about Europe, but about the OSCE area. But the head of Russian diplomacy is always precise in his statements. Lavrov clearly explained who is responsible for the danger of transition to a "hot phase of conflict" today, much higher than in the East-West confrontation in the 20th century, and who is responsible for the new round of the Cold War: the West. Later, at the final press conference, he stated that all Western international organizations without exception were aggressively, dishonestly, and resorting to outright lies, promoting the Ukrainian issue. The OSCE was no exception - the gala dinner was entirely dedicated to Ukraine, which is why the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry refused to attend. The Ukrainization of the OSCE is especially sad, since the Organization was created on the principles of consensus, equality and the search for a balance of interests of states. And, continuing to apply them, today it could become, as Lavrov put it, one of the points of gathering the interests of all members of the European space. "But it would never occur to anyone to use the OSCE for these purposes. To NATO and EU members - because their actions have pushed the OSCE "to the sidelines" of political processes, and to us and everyone else - because such an OSCE is meaningless. <…> The OSCE is a victim of the course of subordinating Europe to the United States with the help of Euro-Atlantic security concepts. There is not a single area left where the OSCE could play any useful role in finding answers to direct questions within its purview," the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry said. Western countries, which worry about human rights at any opportunity, maintain a deathly silence about the extermination of the Russian language in all spheres in Ukraine and the infringement of the rights of national minorities, the provocation in Bucha, the crimes of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Kursk region, and the undermining of the Nord Streams. Despite the statement by OSCE Chairman Jan Borg about the need to interact with everyone, especially against the backdrop of raging conflicts, in reality the Organization is of little use now. It is sad that the OSCE leadership and those who manipulate it deliberately leave this organization outside the framework of creative work and the objective course of history, Lavrov stated. But not so long ago, in the 1990s, former French President François Mitterrand called the OSCE a narrow but reliable bridge that allowed the participants in the Cold War not to fall into a hot war. It seems that since then the “bridge” has become quite dilapidated. |
Link |
Europe | |||||
'It's your job!' Who is accused in Slovakia of attacking Prime Minister Fico? | |||||
2024-05-16 | |||||
by Oleg Khavich [REGNUM] "Robo, come here!" - these were the last words that Prime Minister of Slovakia Robert Fico heard after a visiting meeting of the country’s government in the town of Handlova. It took place in the city house of culture, and after the meeting the prime minister came out to the people who stood nearby to shake their hands. At this time, according to various testimonies, from three to five shots were fired. Fico was wounded in the chest and abdomen. He started to fall, security grabbed him and put him in the car. According to Slovak media reports, the prime minister was sent first to a local hospital, and then by ambulance helicopter to the Roosevelt Hospital in Banska Bystrica. The shooter was detained by security and police; he turned out to be a 71-year-old native of the Slovak city of Levice. The publication Denník N claims that the pistol from which the shots were fired was in legal possession.
According to the portal Pravda. sk, the attacker was walking near the cultural center, and when the prime minister came out, the man approached the crowd and suddenly shot Fico almost point-blank. According to the source of the Pluska portal. sk, Prime Minister Fico's condition is very serious. “He was wounded in the stomach and arm. But at present his life is not in danger. They are going to operate on him,” the source said. Reuters, citing a hospital representative, reported that the Slovak Prime Minister was conscious upon arrival at the hospital, he was treated and his condition was stabilized. Having announced the assassination attempt on Robert Fico, Deputy Speaker of Parliament Lubos Blaga, an ally of the prime minister in the Smer-SD party, closed the meeting for an indefinite period. After this, dissatisfied cries from the opposition were heard, to which Blaga meaningfully replied: “This is your job!” At the moment, possible developments in the event that Fico does not survive are not publicly discussed in Slovakia. The media are discussing who will become acting prime minister in the event that the head of government himself becomes incapacitated for a long time. By law, this must be one of the deputy prime ministers, whose appointment is decided by the prime minister. There are four deputy prime ministers in the Slovak government. One of them is Defense Secretary Robert Kaliniak. Since Kalinyak belongs to the same party as Fico, most likely he will be the acting head of government. Robert Fico's coalition partner, the elected President of Slovakia Peter Pellegrini (Hlas-SD party), said that the assassination attempt on the Prime Minister constituted a threat to everything that adorned Slovak democracy. “ I am shocked at what hatred of other political views can lead to. We don't have to agree with everything, but there are many ways to express our disagreement in a democratic and legal way,” he said. Pellegrini called the attack an unprecedented threat to Slovak democracy. “ If we express other political views with weapons in squares and not in polling stations, we will jeopardize everything that we have built together during 31 years of Slovak sovereignty,” said the politician, who is due to take office as President of Slovakia on June 15 and Now he is urgently returning from abroad. The leader of another political force included in the ruling coalition, Andrej Danko (Slovak National Party, SNS), said that what happened was the beginning of a “political war.” He said changes would inevitably follow in the attitude of the media and politicians of the former government. “I want to tell the opposition to shut up and respect the election results,” Danko said, adding that SNS supports Robert Fico. And his party colleague, Deputy Prime Minister Tomas Taraba, wrote on social networks that “ the entire opposition has blood on its hands.” In turn, all the leaders of the country's opposition parties condemned the assassination attempt and wished Robert Fico a speedy recovery. In particular, ex-presidential candidate of Slovakia from the pro-Western opposition, Ivan Korcok, called the attack on the prime minister an unacceptable act of violence and called for restraint until this act is investigated. The Representation of the European Commission in Slovakia also condemned the assassination attempt on Robert Fico. “Violence has no place in our society,” his statement said. It noted that " this horrific act represents an attack not only on individuals, but also on our democratic values and principles." Let us remember that Fico was previously subjected to sharp criticism from Brussels for his allegedly “pro-Russian” position. It consisted, in the opinion of European bureaucrats, of consistent support for a peaceful resolution of the conflict in Ukraine. The Slovak head of government negatively assessed the position of the European Union on this issue; in his opinion, the EU was unable to come up with a peace initiative. “ Peace must be at the top of the European agenda, because the EU was created as a peace project,” he noted in particular on May 2 at the conference “20 years of Slovakia’s membership in the EU - challenges and opportunities.” Other words of the politician in the context of what happened look like an ominous prophecy. Following the victory of his ally in the presidential election, who beat the pro-Western candidate in a bitter struggle, Robert Fico said that in the near future he expects Brussels to “revenge Korczok’s defeat.” At the same time, the head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, also condemned the “dastardly attack” on the Slovak prime minister. “ I strongly condemn the cowardly attack on Prime Minister Robert Fico. Such acts of violence have no place in our society and undermine democracy, our most valuable common asset. My thoughts are with Prime Minister Fico and his family,” she wrote on the X* platform. Leaders of other European countries and international organizations also condemned the attempt to assassinate the Prime Minister of Slovakia. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban was one of the first to react to the assassination attempt. “I am deeply shocked by the horrific attack on my friend, Prime Minister Robert Fico,” the Hungarian leader wrote in X*, stressing that he “prays for his health and a speedy recovery.” In retweets to this publication, Ukrainian users left characteristic comments: “You’re next!” A source from the Serbian publication Vecernje Novosti reported that Orban and Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic may visit the wounded Slovak prime minister in the “next two or three days. ” In an emergency address to the people, the current President of Slovakia Zuzana Čaputová repeated the formulation of the EC representation that “this is an attack on the individual, but also an attack on democrac,” and called on people not to make hasty conclusions and to stop the “ rhetoric of hatred.” She noted that the police had arrested the criminal and would report this soon, and wished the Prime Minister a speedy recovery. So far, the main version of what happened is that it was the result of a wave of hatred that the current opposition has been whipping up against Fico since the parliamentary campaign last year. He was accused of all the deadly sins - working for the Kremlin, connections with the mafia, involvement in the murder of journalist Jan Kuciak, corruption... Now these attacks have intensified again in connection with the elections to the European Parliament, scheduled for early June. “This is the culmination of those sentiments that are cultivated in society. This is a manifestation of hatred, an attack not only on a person, but also an attack on the prime minister, as well as an attack on the very essence of statehood,” said Slovakia’s Prosecutor General Maros Zilinka. Law enforcement agencies will respond to the assassination attempt uncompromisingly and will take all actions to ensure that the culprit is uncompromisingly and fairly punished, the Prosecutor General said on social media. A similar opinion is shared by security expert and former director of the Office for the Protection of Officials and Diplomatic Missions Juraj Zabojnik. “Society is polarized and there are people full of hatred,” he added. However, he said the attack could have had “several reasons,” but did not specify them. Official Moscow paused after the first reports of the assassination attempt. This is not surprising, given the unfounded accusations of the Slovak prime minister of being “pro-Russian” - the Kremlin does not want to create additional problems for one of the few adequate European politicians. Vladimir Putin sent a telegram to the President of Slovakia in which he asked to convey to Fico “words of the most sincere support, as well as wishes for a speedy and complete recovery.” The Russian expert community speaks out much less diplomatically. Philosopher Alexander Dugin wrote on his Telegram channel that “the assassination attempt on Fico is another blow from the West against those who dare to object to him.” According to a man whose family became a victim of terror, “not only the Kyiv Nazis, but also the modern globalist West itself is a terrorist organization that does not know any rules.” In this regard, Dugin believes that “ Russia should offer assistance to the Slovaks in investigating this disgusting crime, and perhaps in retribution. How can little Slovakia respond to globalist terror?! But we can." In turn, Russian publicist Sergei Mardan believes that the current assassination attempt is a real shot at Sarajevo. “ Anything can happen next, even nuclear escalation, ” he noted on Telegram. And although Juraj Cintula is nothing like Gavrilo Princip, and Robert Fico is nothing like Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the spiral of European history is often very unusual.
The video, obtained by the Guardian, showed a frantic crowd mobbing an individual moments after Prime Minister Robert Fico was struck with at least one slug to the stomach on Wednesday afternoon. Slovakia’s interior minister Matúš Šutaj-Eštok later in the day said the shooting was "politically motivated" after the country’s recent presidential election. Fico was shot five times, officials said. The attack left Fico in "extraordinarily serious" condition and "fighting for his life," Slovakian defense minister Robert Kaliňák said in a presser hours after the shooting, the Guardian reported. "We do not have good news at the moment and we put our hope in the hands of the medical specialists at the hospital," he said, adding the prime minister’s "health is serious, his situation is bad." Fico remained in surgery three and a half hours after first going under the knife, Kaliňák said. Fico’s official Facebook page called the shooting an liquidation attempt. The shooting happened in the town of Handlova, about 90 miles northeast of the capital Bratislava, where Fico was meeting with supporters. Video also showed guards carrying a seriously injured Fico, 59, into a black government car, which then sped off. "At this moment he is transported by helicopter to Banská Bystrica, because it would take too long to get to Bratislava due to the necessity of an acute procedure. The next few hours will decide," the Facebook post said. Photos from the scene showed a white middle-aged man and a bloodied head being detained by police. It was unclear what motivated the shooting. A staunch conservative, Fico was elected to his third term as prime minister in September after campaigning with a pro-Russian and anti-American stance. In Slovakia, the prime minister is the most powerful office. Numerous demonstrations have been staged in Bratislava in protest of Fico’s policies since his election. Despite the tensions, Fico’s opponents in government condemned the shooting, and even canceled a planned protest after the attack. "We absolutely and strongly condemn violence and today’s shooting of Premier Robert Fico," progressive Slovakia leader Michal Simecka said. "At the same time we call on all politicians to refrain from any expressions and steps which could contribute to further increasing the tension," he added.
Slovak Ministry of Internal Affairs head confirmed that Fico was attacked for political reasons [Regnum] The assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico was for political reasons. The head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the republic, Matush Shutai-Eshtok, told reporters about this on May 15. “This assassination attempt was politically motivated,” he said. According to the minister, the attacker could have planned the attack shortly after the country's presidential elections, the second round of which took place on April 6. Earlier, the Slovak TV channel TA3 showed footage of an elderly man declaring his disagreement with government policy. According to the channel, the video shows an assassination suspect who was detained by the police. As reported by IA Regnum, an attempt was made on Fico on May 15 in the city of Gandlov after a meeting of the Cabinet, when he came out to the public. The shots rang out shortly after someone shouted at the politician, “Robo, come here.” After this, Fico fell to the ground. The moment of the assassination was caught on video. The attacker was detained. He turned out to be a 71-year-old supporter of the liberal Progressive Slovakia party, writer Juraj Cintula. Previously, he openly expressed hatred towards Fico on social networks. The wounded prime minister was taken to a Bratislava hospital by helicopter. His condition is assessed as very serious. According to media reports, the politician suffered a hemorrhage in the abdominal cavity. It later became known that Fico’s operation was successful, his condition is stable and he is conscious. Fico has repeatedly condemned sanctions against Russia, noting that they harm the people of Slovakia. In one of his speeches, he expressed the opinion that Moscow is not interested in a third world war. According to the Prime Minister, the Ukrainian conflict could have been extinguished at the very beginning. The politician also stated that he would not support Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In April 2024, Fico noted that Slovakia is interested in friendly relations with Russia. More from regnum.ru The former head of the Kremlin protocol called the assassination attempt on Fico a failure of his security Politicians often ignore the advice of security guards, which could also be the reason why the assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico became possible. This was stated by the former head of the Kremlin’s presidential protocol, who worked under Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Shevchenko. “As for the work of security, politicians often treat its advice without due attention,” Gazeta.ru quoted the expert as saying. At the same time, Shevchenko noted that there are cases when security guards behave too brazenly, which negatively affects the politician’s image. But too gentle behavior can lead to an increase in the likelihood of an assassination attempt. It is difficult to find a balance, the expert noted. In any case, Shevchenko considers it a failure of the security that they could not prevent the attempt on Fico. As Regnum reported, Fico was shot several times on May 15 in the city of Gandlova during his communication with local residents. The prime minister was rushed to the hospital and underwent surgery. According to the latest data, the operation was successful and he is conscious. The current President of Slovakia, Zuzana Caputova, said that the shooter was detained, but did not name him. According to media reports, 71-year-old supporter of the liberal Progressive Slovakia party, writer Juraj Cintula, is accused of the assassination attempt. Fico has repeatedly opposed the supply of weapons to Kyiv, and also called for the normalization of relations with Russia. According to the director of the Institute of Systemic Political Research and Humanitarian Projects, Anatoly Gagarin, it was the political position that could have become the reason for the assassination attempt. He also noted that the direct executor could have been used in the dark. Even more from regnum.ru Slovak Prime Minister Fico successfully operated on after assassination attempt The operation of the Prime Minister of Slovakia Robert Fico, on whom the assassination attempt was made, was successful, his condition is stable, he is conscious. The Slovak TV channel TA3 reported this on May 15. “Fico successfully underwent surgery, his condition is stable and he is communicating,” the statement said. It is noted that the attacker wounded the Prime Minister in the stomach, pelvis and injured a finger. As Regnum reported, Fico was attacked on May 15 in the city of Gandlova, when he went out to talk with residents. He was shot several times by a man standing in the crowd. The victim was sent by helicopter to the hospital. According to Slovak media reports, the attacker was detained. Allegedly, the shooter was a 71-year-old supporter of the liberal Progressive Slovakia party, writer Juraj Cintula. The current President of Slovakia, Zuzana Caputova, confirmed the detention, but did not name him. Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed outrage over the assassination attempt on the Slovak prime minister. He noted Fico's courage and fortitude and wished him a speedy recovery. Fico advocated the restoration of friendly relations with Russia, for which he was called a pro-Russian politician in the European media. Director of the Institute of Systemic Political Research and Humanitarian Projects Anatoly Gagarin believes that they tried to kill the head of government because of his political views. | |||||
Link |
Europe |
Ex-Prosecutor General Skuratov doubts the objectivity of the Katyn investigation |
2024-04-30 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] The investigation into the Katyn tragedy of 1940, when thousands of Polish officers and soldiers were shot, was hardly objective. This opinion was expressed by the former Prosecutor General of Russia Yuri Skuratov, who held this post until 2000. “I don’t know what prompted the new investigation after I left. But I have great doubts that this investigation was objective. There was probably some kind of political decision,” Skuratov noted in an interview with the TASS analytical center. He added that during his tenure as prosecutor general (since October 1995), the “Katyn case” was not investigated. According to him, initially there were statements by the first and only president of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev, who gave the Poles copies of some political documents. Then in 1993 there was a statement by the first president of Russia, Boris Yeltsin. According to the former Prosecutor General, Polish law enforcement agencies turned to the Russian side with a request to participate in the investigation. Moscow agreed, but on the condition of a parallel investigation into the case of genocide in 1920, when 60 thousand Red Army soldiers who were captured on Polish territory died, and in fact were killed. However, Skuratov pointed out, after that the Polish side took a break and fell silent. As Regnum reported, in April–May 1940, 4,421 Polish officers deported to the territory of the Soviet Union were shot in the Katyn Forest, 18 km west of Smolensk. Their remains were buried here. Residents of Smolensk erected a memorial stone at the site of the tragedy. In 2000, Russia’s first international memorial complex-monument to the victims of the totalitarian repression “Katyn” was created there. Next to the burials of Poles in the memorial complex lie the ashes of almost 10 thousand repressed Soviet citizens. More from Boris Rozhin: Katyn case. Shot at Russia Text taken from a news article which appeared in zvezdaweekly.ru, written by Evgeniy Kirichenko. Commentary by Russian military journalist Boris Rozhin is in italics. The Zvezda TV channel raises the issue of falsification of the Katyn case. The truth makes its way. How a provocation developed in the Abwehr and implemented by Joseph Goebbels became a catalyst for the destruction of the USSR THE BOMB PLANTED BY GOEBBELS The Russian FSB published archival documents confirming that the mass execution of Polish officers in the Smolensk region was organized by the Hitlerite Gestapo, and not at all by the Stalinist NKVD, as was claimed in the years "perestroika". Among the declassified materials are certificates from military counterintelligence SMERSH, interrogation reports of Poles who served with the Germans, and testimony from former SS man Arnaud Duret, who participated in the burial of executed Poles. According to the latter, in September 1941 he was sent to a penal company to dig graves for mass burials in the Katyn Forest. SS units brought the bodies of the dead there and threw them into a ditch 15-20 meters deep. He estimates that they buried up to 20 thousand bodies there. Later, in 1943, when Arno came on vacation, he saw in the newspapers a photograph of a ditch, under which it was written that the Russians had done it. “I told my mother that it was not the Russians who did it, but the Germans, but my mother didn’t believe me,” Duret recalled. According to him, he did not tell anyone else about this because he signed a non-disclosure agreement. Another prisoner of war, Eduard Potkansky, admitted during interrogation that the Germans shot many Polish officers in the Katyn Forest for the purpose of provocation against the Soviet regime. In June 1943, the Nazis showed their work battalion the graves, next to which lay personal belongings, money and documents of the killed. However, they were in a form “in which they could not have been preserved in the ground since 1939,” when NKVD officers allegedly carried out executions. The FSB removed the secrecy label from these and other archival materials on the eve of the Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Katyn, which is celebrated in Poland annually on April 13, although the mass execution of captured Poles, as established by Nikolai Burdenko’s commission, occurred in the fall of 1941. However, for some reason Warsaw chose the same day as the memorial date when, in 1943, Berlin announced the “brutal crime of the Bolsheviks,” who allegedly shot 20 thousand Polish officers in the Katyn Forest. A few days after the newspapers of the anti-Hitler coalition published the stunning news, Joseph Goebbels wrote in his personal diary: “The Katyn affair is becoming a colossal political bomb, which under certain conditions will cause more than one blast wave.” The words of the main propagandist of Nazi Germany turned out to be prophetic. Half a century after the Nuremberg Tribunal, which condemned the Nazis for the execution of the Poles, a “blast wave” again covered Europe. And the head of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev, blamed Stalin and the NKVD for the crime. During Wojciech Jaruzelski's visit to Moscow on April 13, 1990, he gave him copies of the “execution lists” with the names of Polish officers allegedly executed in the Katyn Forest. Although in fact these were stage lists of captured Poles sent to NKVD camps. On the same day, the TASS agency, “expressing deep regret,” admitted Soviet responsibility for Katyn, thereby overthrowing the verdict of the International Military Tribunal. Based on this fact, the Prosecutor General's Office will initiate a criminal case, which will then be closed after the death of the perpetrators. However, Warsaw, at the instigation of Gorbachev, already believed that the execution of the Poles was the work of Stalin’s NKVD. This is where the collapse of the Warsaw Bloc countries, and then the entire socialist system, will begin. President Boris Yeltsin will go even further - he will hand over to the Polish side not copies, but genuine lists of “package No. 1” as evidence of Russia’s guilt in the Katyn massacre. The head of state will decide to take this step, despite the fact that the Constitutional Court, obedient to him, was never able to establish the authenticity of archival materials. But Yeltsin didn’t care much about this - he needed a tool with which to discredit the CPSU. The “Katyn Affair” was perfectly suited for this purpose. An aerial view of the exhumation site with rows of bodies of Polish officers lying on the ground near the mass graves (filmed by Nazi cameramen). It was these supposedly authentic documents that were presented in 2009 to the European Court of Human Rights as the main evidence of Russia’s guilt in the Katyn case. Relatives of the 12 executed Polish officers were counting on huge financial compensation. Poland was also going to file a claim for $100 billion. But the incredible happened: on June 18, 2012, the Strasbourg court decided that our country was not responsible for the execution of Poles in Katyn, and the “documents” presented as evidence of guilt were fake. True, by that time Russia had already rushed to apologize for what it had not done. So, what is the essence of the “Katyn Affair”? When and by whom was it fabricated? And most importantly - for what? EVIDENCE THAT CANNOT BE DESTROYED As you know, in 1939, after the Wehrmacht attacked Poland and the flight of its government to Romania, the USSR sent troops to take protection of the population of Western Belarus and Western Ukraine. At the same time, more than 150 thousand Polish soldiers, without offering resistance, surrendered. Of these, 42 thousand returned to the territory occupied by the Germans, and another 42 thousand were liberated in the territory occupied by the Red Army (Red Army). The rest were interned in three camps west of Smolensk. With the beginning of the war, the NKVD tried to organize the evacuation of captured Poles, but only 3 thousand were taken out; the rest expressed a desire to stay in the camps, waiting for the Germans and hoping that they would return them home. However, in order to secure the rear in the occupied territory, SS units executed all the Poles in the fall of 1941. Most of them were killed in the Goat Mountains, which would later be called Katyn. The execution was carried out without disguise as the “NKVD handwriting”, using German-made pistols. If the Germans had known that they would later need to shift the blame onto the Soviet security officers, they would probably have shot them with Russian revolvers and Mosin three-line guns. But no one set such a task. In the spring of 1943, after the Battle of Stalingrad, Western states began to realize that the days of the Third Reich were numbered, and began to prepare for the opening of a second front in Europe. The Nazis urgently needed to split the ranks of the anti-Hitler coalition, and then they remembered the mass grave near Smolensk. This is how the Abwehr came up with a plan for the Katyn provocation, in which not only the “dead”, but also the “living” Poles were supposed to participate. That is, those who had already been shot, and those to whom these remains needed to be demonstrated. The Polish government in exile, warmed by the British in London, was supposed to stir up an international scandal. In order to give a larger scale to the “crime of the Bolsheviks,” in Berlin they decided to increase the number of victims in the place where representatives of the Polish Red Cross were supposed to arrive. The Germans opened the graves in the Goat Mountains and brought remains there from other burial sites, carefully checking the bodies and confiscating documents with dates after April-May 1940. For greater persuasiveness, papers with the “needed” dates were placed on the corpses, but here the Gestapo made a mistake, since many of the owners of the documents later turned out to be alive: Remigiusz Bezhanek, Franciszek Biernacki and others. However, the Nazis did not have time to check all the remains - a commission of the Polish Red Cross had already arrived, and the bodies “unprepared” for inspection were transferred to a separate ditch, to which experts were not allowed. However, there was no need to guard him - the International Commission already worked under German control and did not even keep its own list of identified bodies. But even such an obedient commission could not ignore the shell casings with German markings discovered in the graves. To explain this, the Nazis said that the NKVD shot Poles with German pistols using cartridges supplied to the USSR back in the 1920s. The question arises: why would security officers use ammunition with a long-expired shelf life, which usually does not exceed five years? After all, the cartridges would inevitably misfire. In addition, the Nazis never provided documents confirming the supply of 7.65 mm Walter pistols to Russia. By the way, half a century later, during our own excavations in 1994-1995. In Kozye Gory, Polish experts discovered 79 steel cartridges with the date “41” stamped on them, which could not possibly have been used in April 1940. As for other evidence, it later disappeared. From the end of March to the beginning of June 1943, after the exhumation of the remains of 4,243 Polish officers, the names of 2,730 of them were established. The Germans transferred the documents and objects found on the corpses to the Institute of Forensic Medicine in Krakow, from where they were taken to Germany, where, according to rumors, they were soon burned during the bombing. It is no longer possible to establish who these documents belonged to. The ends are hidden. EXECUTION WITH GERMAN HANDWRITING Moscow resolutely rejected Berlin's accusations, and as soon as the Red Army liberated the Smolensk region, a commission of forensic experts headed by Nikolai Burdenko was sent to Katyn. After exhuming the remains, she carefully examined everything that could be collected from the site of the mass execution. Then, in the clothes of some of the bodies, receipts and receipts were found dating from June - August 1941, which did not fit into Goebbels’ scheme. Based on the data received, the commission was able to expose the Abwehr’s provocation and came to the conclusion that the mass execution in the Katyn Forest was carried out by the Nazis after the occupation of the Smolensk region. It is noteworthy that local residents, whose testimony was cited by the Germans to accuse the Soviet regime, recanted their testimony when they were questioned by the Burdenko commission. Some of the international experts whom the Germans brought to the burial site also renounced their testimony. In particular, pathologist Marko Markov did not sign the German protocol, because he believed that the remains presented for inspection had lain in the ground not for three years, but clearly less. By the way, Markov left detailed memories of this terrible story, in which he expressed doubt about the German version of events. It should be emphasized that the materials of the Burdenko commission were presented to the international tribunal in Nuremberg, which held the Hitler regime responsible for this atrocity. However, very few years will pass, former allies will become irreconcilable enemies, and the Cold War period will begin. Western countries will shake off the archival dust from the Katyn Affair, and the Nazi version will once again become the main ideological tool of anti-Soviet propaganda. The task of Russia's enemies was to destroy the Soviet Union, but first they needed to discredit the CPSU. And Goebbels’ plan turned out to be very useful. ARCHIVAL FAKES? The propaganda campaign in favor of the version of the USSR's guilt in the Katyn Affair, which unfolded in the early 1990s, was based on archival materials that were later found to be fake. The most important document allegedly confirming the fact of the execution of captured Poles by NKVD officers is considered to be a “note” from the Chairman of the KGB of the USSR Alexander Shelepin dated March 3, 1959, addressed to the First Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee Khrushchev. It reported that 21,857 officers, gendarmes “etc. persons of the former bourgeois Poland" were shot based on the decision of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee of March 5, 1940. However, it is worth noting that in 1940 the party had a different name - the VKP(b). It is strange that until now none of the historians have paid attention to this error, which sticks out like an awl from a bag. How did this archival document come about? It is assumed that having headed the KGB, Shelepin received access to the records of captured Poles and came to the conclusion that it would be advisable to “destroy documents on all persons executed in 1940 as part of the said operation.” Perhaps it was from here that the notorious “execution lists” of Polish officers in Katyn arose, which in 1990 were slipped to Mikhail Gorbachev as a “gesture of goodwill” towards Poland. Subsequently, the son of Lavrenty Beria would write: “During Jaruzelski’s official visit to Moscow, Gorbachev gave him only copies of the lists of prisoners of war and internees of the NKVD of the USSR found in the Soviet archives, which included the names of Polish citizens who were in the Kozelsky, Ostashkovsky and Starobelsky NKVD camps in 1939 - 1940. None of these documents speak of the participation of the NKVD in the execution of prisoners of war.” The execution of Poles was discussed in another document from “package No. 1” - a 4-page letter from Beria dated March 5, 1940, addressed to Stalin, where the People’s Commissar of Internal Affairs of the USSR proposed that the cases of Polish citizens held in NKVD camps be “considered in a special manner, with the application of capital punishment to them - execution." According to the famous historian Yuri Zhukov, when he turned to the archives of the President of the Russian Federation for this document in the early 1990s, he was provided with a photocopy of Beria’s note on one page. The resolution in the upper left corner, as the historian explained, was covered during copying. “I believe she rejected the People’s Commissar’s proposal to be shot,” Zhukov told the author. “Otherwise they wouldn’t have hidden her.” They needed to blame everyone and everything for our past. Therefore, all my attempts to obtain the original document were rejected - a state secret.” Today, a color scan of this note, known as “Beria’s letter No. 794/B dated March 5, 1940,” is circulating on the Internet, with all 4 pages of it printed on typewriters with different fonts. Historians note that this is the first sign of forgery when they try to add or change any phrases in the text. On the title page there are sweeping signatures of Stalin, Voroshilov, Molotov and Mikoyan, who supported Beria’s proposal to shoot captured Poles. Moreover, they were all made with the left hand and a pencil of the same color. This is the same resolution of the members of the Politburo of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, which was supposed to be proof of the guilt of the Stalinist regime in the Katyn tragedy. It was this “letter”, along with other archival materials from “package No. 1”, that Boris Yeltsin presented to the Constitutional Court of the RSFSR, where the “CPSU case” initiated by him was considered, but for some reason the accommodating Constitutional Court refused to recognize them as authentic documents. “YAKOVLEV GROUP” In 2010, State Duma deputy Viktor Ilyukhin and research experts Sergei Strygin and Vladislav Shved became aware of how the falsification of the aforementioned “Beria’s letter” was being prepared, which proposed shooting more than 25 thousand Polish prisoners of war. Ilyukhin, at a plenary session of parliament, released information that in the early 1990s, a group of specialists in forging archival documents was allegedly organized, headed by Alexander Yakovlev, a member of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee. “In 1943, Goebbels, trying to destroy the anti-Hitler coalition and quarrel between the USSR and the USA, spread a lie that Stalin and Beria ordered the execution of 10 thousand Polish officers,” said Ilyukhin. - This lie was supported by the Polish government in exile, which was most motivated by a sense of anger at the Soviet Union for the defeat of the Polish army in Western Belarus and Ukraine and the annexation of these territories to the USSR. The well-known Alexander Yakovlev actually advocated for such a compromise of the USSR that the whole world would turn away from our country. After this, the greatest fraud and falsification of archival documents of the CPSU Central Committee took place.” The “Yakovlev Group” worked in the structure of the security service of Russian President Boris Yeltsin, located in the village of Nagornoye, Moscow Region, until 1996, and then was relocated to another locality - Zarechye. From there, according to Ilyukhin, hundreds, if not thousands of false documents were thrown into the archives, and the same number were falsified by introducing distorted information into them and forging signatures. One of the members of this group gave Ilyukhin samples of forms, seals, stamps and postmarks of counterfeiters, which the deputy demonstrated by making a video message, but the official media ignored him. Viktor Ilyukhin initiated a parliamentary review of archival documents, but his death from a heart attack prevented him from completing the work begun, as always happens in such cases. It is noteworthy that in 2004, the Main Military Prosecutor's Office of Russia confirmed that the NKVD troika imposed death sentences on 14,542 Polish prisoners of war, but the death of only 1,803 people was reliably established. And where, in this case, did the rest go? Researchers admit that after the publication of new archival data in the early 1990s, complete clarity on the “Katyn case” did not emerge. Moreover, digital copies of documents from “package No. 1,” which, by order of the president, were previously posted on the website of the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History, have now become inaccessible. Is this due to the fact that their authenticity raises questions among lawyers? The forgery of documents has been recognized by the courts. The results of studies of signs of forgery of the “Katyn” documents from “package No. 1” have been published in many publications and are well known. To date, their falsity has been determined by decisions of at least three Russian courts. In addition to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which received documents as evidence of the alleged guilt of the CPSU (b) - CPSU in the execution of captured Poles, they were also considered by the Basmanny and Tverskoy district courts of Moscow on October 13, 2009 and September 21, 2010. And everyone, having verified the falsification of archival materials, refused to recognize as true the information that Stalin and members of the Politburo of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks had decided on capital punishment for the Poles. I would like to hope that the time will come when the impartial court of history will give an objective assessment not only of all the facts of this tragedy, but also of those individuals who tried to speculate on it, fabricating fakes to discredit the Soviet Union. Involuntarily, I recall the sincere confession of the main ideologist of the CPSU A. Yakovlev: “We had to partially lie, be hypocritical, dissemble - there was no other way. We had to break the totalitarian communist party." But they broke something completely different. As the former Soviet dissident and philosopher Alexander Zinoviev put it, “they aimed for communism, but ended up in Russia.” (c) Evgeniy Kirichenko And to the heap. Today, former Prosecutor General of Russia Skuratov spoke on the topic of Katyn. Former Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Skuratov doubts the objectivity of the investigation in Russia of the “Katyn case,” which led to the admission of guilt by the NKVD in the execution of Polish officers and soldiers in 1940. “There was probably some kind of political decision. After all, we were still full of desire to please the West, and a lot of different kinds of concessions on our part were thrown into this firebox, so to speak,” PS. My position on this matter has not changed since the 2000s - the Poles were shot by the Germans in 1941. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | ||
'Simple contract' and its consequences. Ukraine could have joined NATO in 1954 | ||
2024-04-12 | ||
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Andrey Zvorykin [REGNUM] In April, officials at the Brussels headquarters of the North Atlantic Alliance have many reasons for corporate events and mutual congratulations. One after another follows the anniversary of the founding of NATO's European Command and the return of France to the military structure of the bloc, the fifteenth anniversary of the fourth expansion to the east (with the admission of Croatia and Albania to the alliance). But the main, “semicircular” date in Brussels and NATO capitals from Washington to Skopje was celebrated at the beginning of the month. 75 years ago, the North Atlantic Treaty was signed in Washington, marking the beginning of what current NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg called “the strongest, most resilient and most successful” military bloc in history. The treaty for which the organization is named was signed on April 4, 1949, in the giant neoclassical hall of Washington's Departmental Auditorium on Constitution Avenue (now the building bears the name of billionaire Andrew Mellon ) in front of a large crowd of elite guests and in the presence of President Harry Truman. Conspiracy theorists like to point out the symbolic significance of the site of the Atlantic Pact. When the building was laid in 1932, the cornerstone was presented to then-President Herbert Hoover by the Masters of the Masonic Lodge. But in fact, if the 1949 treaty symbolized anything, it was another milestone in the unfolding Cold War. The pact of 12 Atlantic powers became a logical continuation of Winston Churchill’s Fulton speech about the Iron Curtain from the Baltic to the Adriatic, the refusal to include the USSR and Eastern Europe in the “Marshall Plan”, the thermonuclear and hydrogen race, plans for war with the USSR (the American “Totality” and the British “Unthinkable” plan "), the first Berlin crisis and the first proxy clash between the Western and Soviet blocs - the Greek Civil War. The document was signed by Secretary of State Dean Acheson (soon to be one of the “fathers” of the Korean War) and eleven of his colleagues - the foreign ministers of Canada and a dozen Western European states, from pacifist Iceland without an army to semi-fascist Portugal. The main allies of the United States in the recent anti-Hitler coalition were represented by politicians with a positive “background”: an opponent of the Munich agreement, a man from Churchill’s team, Ernest Bevin, and the chief of French diplomacy, Robert Schumann - who, however, managed to vote for the dictatorial powers of Marshal Philippe Petain, but miraculously avoided being sent to Dachau for connections with the Resistance. Truman, presenting the text of the treaty, poured out peace-loving rhetoric: “This treaty is a simple document. The nations that signed it undertake to comply with the peace-loving principles of the UN and maintain friendly relations.” But, as Joseph Stalin noted a little later (responding to the head of the British Foreign Office on the pages of Pravda ), if “the North Atlantic Pact is a defensive pact” and is directed against aggression, then “why didn’t the initiators of this pact invite the Soviet Union to take part in this pact?”
The “containment” of the Germans, we note, was expressed in the admission of West Germany to the alliance in 1955. This was already the second expansion to the East after the inclusion of Greece and Turkey bordering the USSR (in 1952). Moreover, a year after Stalin’s death, in March 1954, the Soviet government sent an unexpected note to the United States, Great Britain and France with a request... for the admission of the Soviet Union to NATO.
At the beginning of 1949, the head of the Soviet Foreign Ministry, Andrei Vyshinsky, through the leadership of the British Communist Party, sent a proposal to the cabinet of Labor member Clement Attlee to discuss Moscow’s participation in NATO’s predecessor, the Western European Union. London's expected refusal gave Stalin a reason to call the Atlantic blocs a “undermining of the UN.” It seems that the same Vyshinsky (or rather Nikita Khrushchev and Vyacheslav Molotov ) pursued the same goal in 1954. The USSR's gesture demonstrated to the whole world that behind the talk and construction of a security architecture, a military machine is actually being built, in which there is only room for supporters of redividing the world according to their vision. The point of no return was the inclusion of Germany in the alliance - which crossed out the provision of the Potsdam Treaty on a non-aligned post-war Germany. Already in response to this, the Warsaw Pact Organization was created, and the bipolar split of the world finally took shape. Formally, the first military action of the alliance was Operation Maritime Monitor in 1992 - the deployment of a NATO naval group led by the American aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt to the Adriatic to enforce the blockade of Yugoslavia. But in fact, the participation of the European allies and Canada in the Korean War (formally a military action of the UN), and the support that Britain, France, Germany and Italy provided to the United States during the Vietnam War - all this was due, among other things, to obligations under the alliance. What an attempt to bring the country out of strict subordination to the alliance (theoretically, this is possible thanks to Article 13 of the North Atlantic Treaty) may turn out to be can be clearly seen in France. Charles de Gaulle, who had long sought the same powers that the United States and Great Britain had, became disillusioned and in 1966 announced the withdrawal of the Fifth Republic from the military organization of the alliance, retaining membership only in the political structures of NATO. De Gaulle lost his post two years later - after ultra-left protests (ironically, many of the leaders of “Red May 1968” would later become systemic Atlanticist politicians and ideologists), and France began to drift back to the alliance. In 1995, Socialist President François Mitterrand returned the country to participation in the development of NATO military plans. In 1997, Gaullist Jacques Chirac made an attempt to bring France back into the military organization of the alliance - but could not agree with Bill Clinton on the division of powers on the southern flank of NATO. And in 1999, France already fully participated in the aggression against Yugoslavia unleashed by the same Clinton : NATO planes that attacked the defenseless European country took off from both the American aircraft carrier Enterprise and the French Foch. “Without any resolution of the UN Security Council, they directly began military operations, a war, in fact, in the center of Europe,” noted Russian President Vladimir Putin on the 25th anniversary of the NATO strike on Yugoslavia. Only in 2009, another Gaullist, Nicolas Sarkozy, de jure approved the return of France to NATO military structures. But to join the “action”, which claimed the lives of 2.5 thousand peaceful Serbs and Montenegrins, no formal decision was required. Just like Romania - which, without waiting for formal inclusion in the alliance, provided its territory for NATO attacks on Yugoslavia. Such a development would hardly have been possible if it had not been for the end of the Cold War on Western terms. Let us recall that in 1990, an agreement was concluded between representatives of the USSR, the USA and the Federal Republic of Germany (without the participation of representatives of the GDR) on the unification of Germany under the leadership of the Federal Republic of Germany - that is, in fact, on the annexation of the GDR by West Germany. Led by Mikhail Gorbachev, the USSR pledged to withdraw troops from East Germany in exchange for a verbal promise from NATO representatives not to expand the alliance’s borders further to the east. For a long time, the leadership of the alliance completely denied the fact of oral agreements with the head of the USSR. Only in 2018 were documents declassified that contained information that there was an agreement. “We deceived him,” as the theorist of Western geopolitics Zbigniew Brzezinski said about Gorbachev. As a result, first in 1990, the NATO border moved east to the Oder-Neisse line, the former border of the GDR. And then the alliance began to pick up the legacy of the Warsaw Pact dissolved in July 1991. To all Russia’s attempts (its applications to join NATO were rejected in 1993 and 2000) to come to an agreement on security issues, the alliance responds with hysterical cries about Russian aggression (exactly repeating NATO’s rhetoric towards the USSR). In 1999, after the required transition procedures, Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic joined NATO, and in 2004 seven more countries, including three former Soviet republics - Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. The Kaliningrad region became an enclave surrounded by NATO countries; the border of the alliance with Russia ran along the Narva River, 130 km from St. Petersburg. Throughout the 90s, zeros and tens, the alliance “digested” the Balkans. In 1995, NATO countries carried out the “Considerate Force” action - aerial bombing of the Bosnian Serbs (152 civilians were killed, 273 were injured). Four years later, the above-mentioned aggression against Yugoslavia followed - Operation Allied Force. Let us add that during this “action to protect Kosovo Albanians,” which had no military-strategic significance, NATO used prohibited weapons, including shells with depleted uranium. At the same time, the alliance absorbed the loyal republics of the former Yugoslavia - in 2004, the process of admitting Slovenia ended, in 2009, Croatia was included in NATO (along with Albania, a former neighbor and mortal enemy of Yugoslavia), in 2017, the “master” of Montenegro, Milo Djukanovic, for his accommodation were rewarded with the inclusion of the republic in the alliance. And finally, in 2020, North Macedonia was admitted to NATO. Now almost all fragments of dismembered Yugoslavia have the opportunity, as junior partners, to participate in actions to introduce democracy in third world countries. Three such actions can be distinguished since the beginning of the century. Firstly, this is the Afghan campaign. If we do not count the assistance of NATO countries to the “freedom fighters” - the Mujahideen during the war of 1979–1989 (thanks to which the military-political career of Osama bin Laden was successfully launched ), then October 2001 should be considered the starting point. During the American Operation Enduring Freedom (2001–2021) and the “work” of NATO members of the International Security Assistance Force, 46,300 civilians were killed. The production of methamphetamine in democratized Afghanistan increased 10-fold in 2017–2021 alone, and by 2018 the share of the Afghan “product” in the global heroin market was 92%. The ending of the American and NATO operation in Afghanistan is well known. The world will long remember people falling from great heights, trying to cling to taking off planes and service dogs, who were several positions higher on the American evacuation lists than even the British allies. If NATO entered Afghanistan under the guise of a UN Security Council resolution (adopted, however, only two months after the invasion), then the Americans and their alliance colleagues began the war in Iraq of 2003–2011 without any regard for international law. Iraq’s “punishment” for the mythical development of weapons of mass destruction (remember Secretary of State Colin Powell ’s test tube that became a meme ) turned into a humanitarian disaster. According to a report from the Iraqi Ministry of Health to WHO alone, up to 203 thousand civilians died during the first stage of “democratization” (2003–2006). According to the non-governmental project Iraq Body Count, by 2011, 1 million 620 thousand people were killed, died from wounds and diseases caused by the war, of which 72% were civilians. After the bombing, more than 750 hospitals, 3,970 clinics and 5,700 educational institutions were destroyed. If not all NATO partners took part in the aggression against Iraq (Britain, Turkey, Italy distinguished themselves, including the “newcomer” Poland), then the intervention in Libya of March - October 2011 was already a joint action of the majority of the alliance members. Except perhaps for Germany, which allowed itself to abstain. One of the main initiators of the aggression was Nicolas Sarkozy, who returned France to the NATO military structure. The Ministry of Health of the then-not-yet-destroyed Libyan Jamahiriya managed to report 700 civilians who died in March–May 2011 after attacks on Tripoli, Benghazi and other cities. If we believe the latest estimates from Iranian sources, up to 40 thousand Libyans became victims of the NATO intervention. The main thing is that NATO’s assistance to the Libyan “democratic opposition” in “liberation from the tyranny of Muammar Gaddafi ” led to the complete destruction of Libyan statehood and two civil wars (2011–2014 and 2014–2020), which also claimed the lives of tens of thousands of people, in particular 14, 2 thousand people during the last conflict. One of the most stable and socially prosperous countries of the former third world has turned into another “failed state” and a supplier of migrants to Europe. From February 2022 to the present day, the Kiev regime has been the next object of NATO’s special care. The alliance is close to the geopolitical goal identified at the end of the Cold War. With the admission of former “neutrals” - Finland and Sweden - to NATO, an anti-Russian sanitary cordon has practically been built from the Barents Sea to the Black Sea, the links of which are intended to be post-Soviet countries from Estonia to Moldova and Ukraine. The plans were disrupted first by the failure of the pro-Western “color revolution” in Belarus in 2020, and then by the beginning of the Northern Military District. Today, NATO continues its aggressive policy, sponsoring the Ukrainian regime with weapons that are used to attack peaceful Russian cities. Residents of Belgorod, as well as residents of Belgrade, are unlikely to agree with the compliment that Jens Stoltenberg gave on the 75th anniversary: “We are doing something right! We helped spread peace, democracy and prosperity throughout Europe." | ||
Link |
Europe |
'Bring back the gold': how many tons of precious metal were transferred to Romania by the leaders of the USSR |
2024-03-16 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Igor Ivanenko [REGNUM] The European Parliament resolution, adopted on March 14, demands that Russia return to Romania its gold reserves and cultural values exported to the Russian Empire during the First World War. The size of the claim is estimated at 91.5 tons of precious metal. It is worth immediately noting that such a request in itself absolutely does not take into account the financial relations of our countries over the last century. Romania transferred its gold reserves to Russia for storage in 1916–1917, when it was defeated by the troops of the Kaiser’s Germany and Austria-Hungary. In 1923–1924, the Soviet People's Commissariat of Finance carried out the first inventory of Romanian funds after the arrival of the “golden” trains and estimated their contents at 117.9 million gold rubles (the equivalent of more than 91 tons of gold). At the same time, only the official debt of Romania to Russia at the end of the First World War reached 1.72 billion gold rubles, which is equivalent to approximately 1330 tons of gold. In addition, Bucharest appropriated Russian property in Bessarabia, which it annexed in 1918. Despite all the somersaults of the Romanian Kingdom in World War II, it was obliged to pay reparations of 300 million US dollars, which corresponded to 335 tons of pure gold. The Soviet Union wrote off $220 million for humanitarian reasons, just to account for the “royal gold.” In addition, Soviet governments repeatedly demonstrated “gestures of goodwill”, trying to win over their neighbor by transferring gold and other valuables. The first of these followed in 1934. Then 12 tons of gold and archives of the Romanian government were sent to Bucharest. A truly royal gift was made by Joseph Stalin, who allocated 30 tons of gold to form the gold reserves of the Romanian People's Republic. Nikita Khrushchev handed over another 4 tons of gold and ordered the return of 39,320 pieces of art previously taken from Romanian museums. Leonid Brezhnev authorized the transfer of 8 tons of gold to Romania. The last “golden train” from the USSR left for Romania under Mikhail Gorbachev. In 1986, the Secretary General presented the obstinate ally in the socialist bloc with 10 tons of gold. Thus, Romania’s chances of obtaining these assets are illusory. Moreover, the Russian Federation recognized only the debts of the Russian Empire to public and private creditors. The issue of gold reserves and cultural values transferred by Romania for the protection of the Russian Empire has never been recognized in the Russian Federation. So what is official Bucharest guided by when raising the topic of gold reserves “appropriated” by Russia? The fact is that Romanian politicians of the first magnitude are today fighting for top positions in Euro-Atlantic structures. On February 7, Romanian President Klaus Iohannis stated directly in the European Parliament: “It would be unacceptable if not a single position was occupied by a person from the new member states, that is, from Eastern Europe.” At the same time, he is personally nominated for the posts of President of the European Council or the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs. The other day, the current head of Romania said that he would not object to his candidacy for the post of NATO Secretary General. Similar activities are being undertaken by the Social Democratic Party of Romania. She promotes her representative Mircea Geoana, the current Deputy Secretary General of NATO, to the post of European Commissioner for Defense. It is obvious that, having such great ambitions, Romanian politicians are simply obliged to contribute to anti-Russian rhetoric at the pan-European level. The topic of “gold stolen by Russia” may become an important part of the election programs of Romanian candidates for important positions. And besides, this is a potential argument for the motivational part of the long-discussed decision to confiscate Russian assets frozen in Europe. Discussions of this kind play an important role in fueling pro-European sentiments in Romanian society. Moreover, not everything is in order with his trust in EU institutions. According to a January survey by the major sociological agency Avangarde, a quarter of Romanians surveyed do not see a future for their country within the European Union. Another 9% said that they could not decide on this issue. Citizens of Romania are very cautious when it comes to providing support to Ukraine. The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) reported in a February poll that only 12% of Romanians favor maintaining aid at current levels (the European average is 20%). And 44% of respondents believe that aid to Kyiv will need to be reduced and peace negotiations with the Russian Federation stimulated if Trump does this after winning the election. According to the same survey, only Hungarians are the biggest pacifists in the EU. And this despite the fact that Euro-optimism, as well as pro-Ukrainian sentiments, today, in fact, constitute the official ideology of Bucharest and are continuously broadcast by government media. Such sentiments threaten unpleasant surprises for the ruling Social Democratic and Liberal parties in Romania in the upcoming European Parliament elections in June. The nationalist Alliance for the Unification of Romanians (AUR) is able to take second place in them, and the main Eurosceptics Diana Soshoaca and Gheorghe Simion share second place in the rating of Romanians' trust in politicians, second only to Prime Minister Marcel Ciolak. By the way, the trust rating of Vladimir Putin, the most famous foreign leader in Romania, is more than 11%. This is a very decent result in the conditions of total anti-Russian propaganda and a complex of historical grievances against Russia and the USSR being exaggerated in Romanian society. Obviously, the topic of “stolen gold” was precisely what was needed to strengthen the propaganda background, as well as to curb Eurosceptic sentiments among Romanians. Another thing is that the socio-economic contradictions between Romanian society and the European Commission today are too great to be obscured by such PR campaigns. |
Link |
-Obits- |
Russian Vladimir Nekrasov, 66, suddenly vacates Lukoil board chairmanship |
2023-10-25 |
Vladimir Nekrasov, 66, chairman of the Lukoil board of directors, died 'suddenly', with Russian state media reporting the 'preliminary' conclusion of doctors was that he suffered 'acute heart failure'. In the end, it's always heart failure His death follows that of Ravil Maganov, 67, at Central Clinical Hospital, also known as the Kremlin clinic, in September last year. Officially, Maganov had been in hospital for a long-standing heart problem and fell from a sixth-floor window, dying on the spot. On the same morning, Vladimir Putin - who had earlier decorated Maganov with a top honour - swept into the hospital to pay his final respects to Mikhail Gorbachev, the last Soviet leader, who had died the same week. Billionaire Alexander Subbotin, 43, also linked to energy giant Lukoil where he was a top manager, was found dead in May after 'taking advice from shamans'. One theory is that Subbotin - who also owned a shipping company - was poisoned by toad venom, triggering a heart attack. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: August 8th, 2023 |
2023-08-09 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. Worth noting, korrespondent.net has compiled its Invasion of Ukraine series into separate months, beginning May 9th, 2023. Linked in the title Worth noting, korrespondent.net has compiled its Invasion of Ukraine series into separate months, beginning May 9th, 2022. Linked in the title [Korrespondent] 23:04 Zelensky said in an evening video message that he held a meeting today on the policy of returning Ukrainians, in particular to Crimea: "It is obvious that after the liberation of Crimea from occupation, economic opportunities, personal security for people, and a sense of real freedom, which it hasn't been there since 14. But all this should not be just abstract - there should be specific content for every detail of the de-occupation of Crimea. How exactly normal life is returning, what exactly does this mean for Crimea and for all our people. everyone understands. Step by step, we are making the de-occupation of Crimea more and more achievable and thoughtful." ![]() 22:45 As a result of the Russian strike on Pokrovsk, Donetsk region, nine people were killed and 82 were injured. Among the wounded are two children, Zelensky said in an evening video message. 22:28 From August 11, Latvia introduces an enhanced border security regime with Belarus, the country's government has announced. 22:06 The German publication Handelsblatt found out that 50 Leopard 1 tanks were purchased for Ukraine from the Belgian company OIP Land Systems by the Rheinmetall concern. The German company plans to re-equip the tanks at the enterprises of the Dusseldorf Group and send them to Ukraine. 21:50 School history textbooks have been rewritten in Russia, adding fakes about the collapse of the Soviet Union and the war in Ukraine. Soon high school students in the Russian Federation will consider the era of stagnation "the heyday of the country", and Mikhail Gorbachev will be responsible for the collapse of the USSR. The book will also teach Russian children that Ukraine is an "ultra-nationalist state" where "any dissent" is persecuted. For more details, see How Russia Rewrote History . 21:18 The European Union as a bloc cannot give security guarantees to Ukraine - this is a discussion for NATO and individual countries, said the representative of the EU Foreign Service in Brussels, Peter Stano. According to him, the EU, in principle, cannot act as a guarantor of security, since, unlike NATO, it is not a defense organization. 19:56 Danilov said that Prigozhin's rebellion was a special operation agreed upon by Putin in order to identify disloyal generals. According to the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council, there is already an understanding of the number of generals suspended from their duties, some of them have been arrested. 19:07 The head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense, Kirill Budanov, visited Bulgaria, where he met with Defense Minister Todor Tagarev and Director of the Military Intelligence Service, General Venelin Venev, Radio Bulgaria reports. They discussed the state of regional and international security, prospects for the development of the situation and other topics. 18:52 Ukraine intends to become the world leader in the production of drones, said the head of the Ministry of Digital Development Mikhail Fedorov in an interview with Newsweek. According to him, after the end of the war, Ukraine has every chance of becoming the largest exporter of drones, since each model has been tested in real combat conditions. Now in Ukraine, within the framework of the Army of Drones program , 40 UAV models have been tested - a year ago there were seven of them. 17:39 In Pokrovsk, emergency rescue work has been completed in a five-story residential building damaged as a result of Russian shelling on August 7. According to preliminary information from the State Emergency Service, seven people were killed, including one rescuer, and another 82 people were injured. Eight people have been rescued. 17:04 The UK has imposed new sanctions against 22 individuals and entities outside of Russia that support the war against Ukraine, as well as three Russian companies that import electronics for the Russian army, the country's government said. In particular, two Turkish companies - Turkik Union and Azu International - were included in the sanctions list for their role in the export of microelectronics to the Russian Federation. And Dubai-based Aeromotus Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Trading LLC has been sanctioned for its role in supplying Russia with drones and drone components. Also, restrictions were imposed against a Slovak citizen for mediating the supply of weapons from the DPRK to Russia and a Swiss citizen who heads the Moscow office of DuLac Capital Ltd. The restrictions also included Iranian individuals and legal entities and Belarusian defense organizations. 16:17 An unnamed country bought a batch of Leopard 1 tanks for Ukraine, the Belgian edition of Business AM reports, citing sources. The tanks were in the warehouse of OIP Land Systems in the Belgian city of Tournai. Now they are undergoing a major overhaul, and some have already been sent to Ukraine. 15:59 The Russians fired at Kupyansk, Kharkiv region, a 14-year-old child was wounded, the head of the OVA, Oleg Sinegubov, said. According to him, the enemy intensified shelling of the city and surrounding settlements. 15:56 The European Commission has begun preparing a report on EU enlargement, which should be published in the second half of October. It is likely that it will contain recommendations for Ukraine and Moldova to start negotiations on EU accession, and for Georgia - on the status of a candidate, according to the Brussels correspondent of Radio Liberty Rikard Jozwiak. At the same time, he added that this requires a consensus of all 27 EU members in December. 15:18 Prime Minister of the Netherlands Mark Rutte said that he had a telephone conversation with Zelensky. "One of the ways we can help is to work with our partners to train Ukrainian pilots to fly F-16s," he wrote. Rutte also congratulated Zelensky on a "successful meeting in Saudi Arabia." 14:40 The death toll from yesterday's Russian strike by four guided bombs on the village of Kruglyakovka, Kupyansky district, Kharkiv region, has risen to three, nine people were injured, the regional prosecutor's office said. 14:23 The Polish Ministry of Defense has agreed to send an additional thousand troops to the border with Belarus at the request of the border service, PAP reports. Now 2,000 Polish soldiers are serving on the border, helping the border forces. The strengthening of the border began after the arrival of Wagner PMC mercenaries in Belarus. In early August, Poland deployed additional combat helicopters to the border after the Belarusian Mi-8 and Mi-24 violated its airspace. 13:37 Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has removed from storage more than 40% of old tanks and armored personnel carriers from the largest base of mothballed equipment Vagzhanovo in Buryatia, writes The Moscow Times. So, if five months before the start of the war, about 3840 units of armored vehicles were stored in Vagzhanovo, then already in May of this year - about 2270 units. 13:28 The first agreements on security guarantees for Ukraine on the way to NATO will be concluded before the end of the year, Yermak said. He recalled that negotiations with the United States have already begun to conclude a bilateral agreement on the provision of such guarantees. "We also agreed with all the countries that signed the declaration in Vilnius and joined it to start similar consultations. They will start within this or next month," the head of the President's Office said. According to him, "these security guarantees are like air defense against a future world war." 13:16 Since the beginning of the large-scale invasion of the Russian Federation, as a result of Russian shelling during the aftermath of missile strikes, 78 rescuers were killed and 280 were injured, said Alexander Khorunzhiy, spokesman for the State Emergency Service. He recalled that rescuers are protected by international conventions, since they do not conduct hostilities, but leave to save people and help. 12:44 The head of the Donetsk OVA, Pavel Kirilenko, explained why so many rescuers and policemen were injured during the strike on Pokrovsk. According to him, this is Russia's tactic: the first blow is inflicted on civilians, and the second - on the services that come to the place. So, the first blow to Pokrovsk was delivered at 19:15, the second - at 19:52. At the same time, Kirilenko noted that people were dispersed before the second strike: "If there had been a congestion of people and no additional measures had been taken literally in ten minutes, the consequences would have been much worse." 12:13 In the occupied part of the Kherson region, the Russians are organizing provocations to identify pro-Ukrainian citizens cooperating with the Defense Forces, said Anna Malyar. In particular, they spread fake news about the withdrawal of their troops and demonstratively moved military equipment, while enemy agents provoked people to freely express their thoughts and passed information about them to the occupying "law enforcement agencies." In addition, the occupiers deliberately disconnected subscribers from Russian mobile operators and wired Internet, and at that time cars equipped with special electronic equipment to detect the operation of information transmitters were cruising the streets. 12:04 Already 20,000 Ukrainian recruits have been trained as part of the Interflex multinational training operation in the UK, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reported. 11:25 The Russians fired on the Cossack Lopan of the Kharkiv region, two people were injured, the head of the OVA Oleg Sinegubov said. 11:22 As a result of two Russian strikes by Iskanders on residential buildings in the center of Pokrovsk on the evening of August 7, 81 people were injured, seven were killed, said the head of the Donetsk OVA Pavel Kirilenko. Among the wounded are 39 civilians, including two children, 31 police officers, seven employees of the State Emergency Service and four military personnel. Damage was recorded to 12 multi-storey buildings, hotel buildings, the prosecutor's office, a pension fund, a pharmacy, two shops, two cafes and two civilian cars. 11:08 Since the beginning of the year, Ukraine has quadrupled the production of Stugna-P anti-tank missile systems, and the positive dynamics continues, said Alexander Kamyshin, Minister for Strategic Industries. At the same time, he added that "no matter how much we produce now, it will not be enough." According to the minister, now civilian Ukrainian enterprises are actively reorienting to the production of defense products, so the entire military-industrial complex is actively growing. In his opinion, the state should own only 20% of the defense industry, since private companies are developing faster. 11:01 The Armed Forces of Ukraine are developing success after breaking through the first line of defense of the Russians in certain areas in the South, Natalya Gumenyuk said. At the same time, she added that this is a difficult job and only the first stage when the line of defense breaks through: "After that, you need to gain a foothold in those areas and provide security for the units that made the breakthrough. Therefore, here the news may be somewhat slowed down." According to her, the advance continues, but it is reported in a dosed manner in order to save the lives of the military. 10:49 Putin's decision to provide the National Guard with heavy weapons may indicate that he views this structure as one of the main security pillars of his regime, according to British intelligence. Analysts recall that the Russian Guard has about 200 thousand employees and has existed in its current form since 2016, it is headed by Putin's former bodyguard Viktor Zolotov. At the same time, as noted in intelligence, there is no evidence that the Russian Guard conducted any effective actions against the Wagner PMC during the rebellion, although this was precisely the internal threat for which this structure was created to respond. 10:16 Russia, after drone attacks on its ships, dispersed its ship grouping in the Black Sea, spokesman for the Southern Defense Forces Natalya Gumenyuk said: “There is a slight panic in the Black Sea after certain events. they considered it safe for themselves and their fleet. But now safety for them is maneuvers. " According to Gumenyuk, "now the situation is stable, but we do not remove the tension from the missile danger, so as not to lose vigilance." 09:48 The Chinese Foreign Ministry announced a telephone conversation between Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Lavrov. Wang Yi said after a meeting in Saudi Arabia on Ukraine that Beijing remains "impartial" and China and Russia are "trustworthy and reliable good friends and partners." "On the issue of the Ukrainian crisis, China will uphold an independent and impartial position, express an objective and rational voice, actively promote peace negotiations and strive to find a political solution to any international multilateral event," the Chinese Foreign Minister said. 09:13 The Russians have intensified shelling of the Zaporozhye region - over the past day, 105 strikes were recorded on 24 settlements, the head of the OVA, Yuriy Malashko, said. In Novodanilovka, the analysis of a house destroyed by an airstrike has been completed: the body of a dead man, who was considered missing, was pulled out from under the rubble. As a result of the night shelling of Preobrazhenka, one person was injured. 09:06 In the Kherson region over the past day, as a result of Russian shelling, one person died, 13 were injured. In total, the enemy fired 68 shells, fired 18 shells at the city of Kherson. The shells hit the residential areas of the settlements of the region, the building of the Invincibility Point in Kherson, the OVA reported. 08:59 As a result of yesterday's Russian strike by four guided air bombs on the village of Kruglyakovka, Kupyansky district, Kharkiv region, two people were killed and five were injured, Oleg Sinegubov, head of the OVA, said. In addition, two employees of the State Emergency Service and two police officers were injured. Six houses were damaged. Over the past day, Russians from artillery, mortars and other weapons fired at the settlements of Bogodukhovsky, Kharkov, Chuguevsky and Kupyansky districts. One person was wounded in Petropavlovka, Kupyansky district. 08:55 Japan called on Iran not to provide Russia with weapons for the war against Ukraine, the Japanese government said following a meeting between the foreign ministers of the two countries. 08:31 The General Staff announced the approximate losses of the Russian Federation as of the morning of August 8:
07:44 The death toll as a result of a Russian missile attack on Pokrovsk, Donetsk region, has risen to seven, 67 people were injured. Among the wounded were 29 police officers, seven rescuers and two children, Interior Minister Igor Klymenko said. The demolition of the rubble has now been resumed - it had to be suspended at night due to the high threat of repeated shelling. The head of the Donetsk OVA, Pavel Kirilenko, specified that among the seven dead there were five civilians, one worker of the State Emergency Service and one military man. Among the wounded are 29 civilians (including two children born in 2006 and 2012), 29 police officers, seven employees of the State Emergency Service and two military men. 07:35 Over the past day, 37 clashes took place at the front, the General Staff said in the morning summary . In particular, in the Kupyansky direction, the Defense Forces repelled enemy attacks in the Sinkovka districts, north of Ivanovka, Kharkiv region, and south of Novoselovsky, Lugansk region. In the Bakhmut direction, the enemy conducted unsuccessful offensive operations in the areas of Andreevka, Kurdyumovka and Druzhba of the Donetsk region. In the Avdiivka direction, Ukrainian defenders repulsed the attacks of Russian troops in the Avdiivka area, and in the Maryinsky direction they continue to hold back the enemy’s advance in the Maryinka area. In the Zaporozhye direction, the Russian army made unsuccessful attempts to restore the lost position in the Robotino area of the Zaporozhye region. Meanwhile, the Defense Forces continue their offensive operation in the Melitopol and Berdyansk directions. 06:40 New history textbooks have been published in Russia, in which chapters from the 1970s have been completely rewritten, and a new one has been added - about a "special military operation." In particular, in the new textbook schoolchildren will be told that Ukraine is an "ultra-nationalist state" where "any dissent is severely persecuted", "opposition is forbidden", and "everything Russian is declared hostile". The textbook also says that the United States is “determined to fight to the last Ukrainian,” and the West “stole” Russian assets worth more than $300 billion. High school students are also warned that the "global industry" for the production of fakes "works in a continuous conveyor", so they should not turn to alternative sources and find out information about the war on the Internet. The textbook for grades 10-11 will be used in schools from September 1. 05:52 On Tuesday, August 8, the US administration will announce the provision of a new $200 million military aid package to Ukraine, Reuters reports, citing sources. The package will include anti-tank missile systems, including TOW, AT4 and Javelin, mine-clearing equipment and ammunition for Patriot air defense systems, as well as other equipment and ammunition. This tranche will be the latest in a $25.5 billion aid package previously approved by Congress, under which the administration can transfer arms to Ukraine from US depots. In addition, according to the head of the US Army Procurement Division, Doug Bush, the White House is working on a request for additional funding for Ukraine. It may be ready for consideration in Congress this fall. "I think we will have a very strong case, and we hope to get the support of Congress for further funding - in particular, to increase the production of ammunition and purchases of ammunition to support Ukraine," Bush said. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Who is 'General Armageddon,' Russia's new Ukraine war commander? |
2022-10-14 |
[Jpost] When examining the track record of the new commander, nicknamed “The Butcher of Syria” for his part in Russian operations in Syria, the missile onslaught on Ukraine may not come as a surprise. Only two days after the appointment of a new commander of the Joint Group of Forces in Russia's invasion of Ukraine, General Sergei Surovikin, a wave of missile strikes swept across Ukraine, hitting countless civilian targets. “I am not surprised to see what happened this morning in Kyiv. Surovikin is absolutely ruthless, with little regard for human life,” a former defense ministry official, who has worked with Surovikin, told the Guardian. “I am afraid his hands will be completely covered in Ukrainian blood.” According to Ukrainian sources, Surovikin is trying to achieve "quick results" in order to appease Russian President Vladimir Putin, and according to Ukrainian intelligence, this is exactly his style. “This is his style, the style of the new butcher of the Russian army in Ukraine – to launch rockets at infrastructure, in particular civilian infrastructure facilities, he is trying to show that Putin's new personnel appointments in Russia have some meaning, to show some quick results," Ukrainian intelligence said. When examining the track record of the new commander, who earned the nickname “General Armageddon” in Syria for his tough and uncompromising approach, this missile onslaught may not come as such a surprise. "THE BUTCHER OF SYRIA" Surovikin led Russia's military campaign in Syria in March of 2017, initially, he was supposed to serve a mere three months in the region to gain some firsthand combat experience, but ended up commanding Russian forces in Syria until the end of the year. Surovikin’s “defending” of Moscow’s interests in Syria involved dozens of air and ground attacks on civilian objects and infrastructure, particularly in Aleppo, where the city was practically leveled. Russian forces under his command struck Syrian “homes, schools, healthcare facilities, and markets – the places where people live, work, and study,” according to a 2020 Human Rights Watch report. The report further stated that air and ground attacks on civilian sites, including homes, schools and hospitals, were a hallmark of Russia’s campaign in Idlib, which Surovikin participated in during his second tour in 2019. “He is being called the ‘Butcher of Syria,’ but every general that took that post was a butcher of Syria,” Kirill Mikhailov, a researcher with the Conflict Intelligence Team (CIT), which has been monitoring Russian military activities since 2014 told the Washington Post. “It’s a job you take because killing people and making their life miserable is what the Russian air force can do best.” The Russian Defense Ministry repeatedly credited Surovikin with achieving critical gains in Syria, saying that Russian and pro-Assad Syrian forces “liberated over 98 percent” of the country under him. From his time in Syria, Surovikin had developed a good working relationship with the Wagner private military company, Gleb Irisov, a former air force lieutenant who worked with Surovikin up to 2020 told the Guardian. THE EARLY BEGINNINGS OF "GENERAL ARMAGGEDON" The career of 55-year-old Surovikin developed rapidly and was filled with scandals at almost every stage. Surovikin first gained notoriety during the failed 1991 coup d’état attempt against Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, when he led a motorized rifle division through barricades erected by pro-democracy protesters. Three men were killed in the clash, including one who was crushed. “It is very symbolic that Sergei Surovikin, the only officer who ordered the shooting of protesters in August 1991 and killed three people, is now leading a desperate effort to restore the USSR ,” wrote Grigory Yudin, a Russian political scientist and sociologist. “These people knew what they were doing, and now they know too.” After the failed coup, Surovikin was jailed for several months but then was freed and never convicted of any crime as prosecutors in Moscow ruled that he was simply obeying an order, the Russian state newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta reported in 2011. In 1995, as a student of the Frunze Military Academy, the military court of the Moscow garrison found Surovikin guilty under three articles of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR then in force, accusing him of stealing, illegally holding and attempting to sell firearms. But the sentence turned out to be soft and completely humane: one year of imprisonment on probation. His ruthless reputation grew in 2004 when a report in the business daily Kommersant reported that a colonel serving under him had killed himself after he received a heated dressing-down from Surovikin. The report further stated that a lieutenant colonel from Surovikin’s division filed a complaint against Surovkin and other officers for beating him because of political differences. KREMLIN TRIES TO APPEASE HARDLINE CRITICS By appointing Surovikin, the Kremlin may be trying to satisfy its nationalists and top critics, who blame the Russian army leadership for the repeated failures in Ukraine and for not using tough enough measures to force Kyiv into submission. His appointment has indeed softened some of the public outrage among Russian hardline nationalists, who were growing increasingly impatient with the country’s military failures. Ramzan Kadyrov, the notorious head of the Chechen republic, and the Wagner head, Yevgeny Prigozhin welcomed Surovikin's new appointment as they both pushed for a much tougher stance on Ukraine. In the past month and a half, both the head of Chechnya and the creator of the Wagner PMC, against the background of heavy defeats of Russian troops at the front, openly, although without naming the names of Sergei Shoigu and Valery Gerasimov, criticize the leadership of the Russian Defense Ministry for insufficiently decisive actions and retreats. Kadyrov even went as far as to criticize Moscow for not using enough force in Ukraine, suggesting the use of low-yield nuclear weapons. “Now, I am 100% satisfied with the operation,” Kadyrov wrote on his Telegram channel on Monday morning, referring to the shelling of Kyiv, where at least 11 civilians were killed. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | |
Russian Oil Exec Critical of Ukraine Invasion Dies After ‘Falling from Hospital Window' | |
2022-09-02 | |
Maganov, an outspoken critic of Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s attack on Ukraine, was the fourth Russian energy tycoon to die under mysterious circumstances since the invasion began. Various sources in Russia provided conflicting accounts of Maganov’s death. Russia’s state-run Tass news agency quoted sources who claimed he committed suicide by leaping from the sixth floor of the Central Clinical Hospital in Moscow, a facility informally known as the “Kremlin Clinic” because it caters to the Russian elite. It is the same hospital where former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev died on Tuesday. According to Tass, Maganov was receiving treatment at the hospital after a heart attack and was taking antidepressant drugs. Lukoil, on the other hand, issued a press release that said its vice president “passed away following a severe illness.” The hospital refused to officially comment on the cause of death and Moscow police refused to comment on their investigation of the incident. Two people who claimed to know Maganov personally told Reuters they found it “highly unlikely” that he would commit suicide. Lukoil made an unusual break from the Putin regime in March, issuing a statement that called for the “soonest termination of the armed conflict” and expressing “sincere empathy for all victims.” “We strongly support a lasting ceasefire and a settlement of problems through serious negotiations and diplomacy,” the company said. In May, former Lukoil manager Alexander Subbotin was found dead in the basement of a house in suburban Moscow. The official cause of death was that a witch accidentally killed him with a poison toad. Two other Russian energy oligarchs, Sergei Protosenya and Vladislav Avayev, died under murky circumstances in April. Protesenya supposedly murdered his wife and 18-year-old daughter with an axe and then hanged himself in a luxury Spanish villa. As with Maganov, people who knew Protosenya doubted he would commit such a brutal murder-suicide. Avayev also allegedly killed his wife and teenage daughter in a murder-suicide at their posh Moscow apartment, using a gun. Several other Russian millionaires unconnected with the energy industry have died under enigmatic circumstances since the invasion of Ukraine began, and a high-level manager at Russia’s state Gazprom energy company, 60-year-old Leonid Schulman, reportedly committed suicide a month before Russian troops moved into Ukraine. A Russian banker named German Gorbuntsov said in a June documentary film called Secrets of the Oligarch Wives that these outbreaks of Sudden Oligarch Death Syndrome are just as sinister as they appear. He said even the slight variations in “suicide” methods are part of the design. | |
Link |
-Obits- |
Mikhail Gorbachev, Former Soviet Leader Who Ended Cold War Pegs Out At 91 |
2022-08-31 |
[PUBLISH.TWITTER]
|
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Gorbachev complains that Putin destroyed his life's work |
2022-07-25 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited Commentary by Russian military blogger Andrey Chervonets Mikhail Gorbachev believes that the special operation in Ukraine destroyed all his legacy. ![]() Alexei Venediktov, ex-editor-in-chief of Echo of Moscow, spoke about this in an interview with the Russian edition of Forbes. “I can tell you that he is disappointed and perfectly understands everything that is happening. It was his life's work. Freedom is Gorbachev's business," Venediktov said. Is it Mishka and the company that they call freedom, the surrender of interests and, in fact, the sovereignty of the country to the enemy? Freedom is called the fact that pans from America and England directly rule the Ukrainians? And is it also a legacy not to fix the obligation of the West not to expand NATO to the east on paper? Everything that is happening now is on Gorbachev's conscience. There has never been a greater traitor to his country and people in history, Gorbachev cannot even be compared with Judas, since Judas, after what he had done, realized the gravity of his act and hanged himself. It was thanks to the actions of Humpback that the Union collapsed, the nationalists raised their heads, and not only in Ukraine. Tens of millions of people on the territory of the former USSR are forced to disentangle this "legacy". Bandera and national strife are also Gorbachev's legacy. Russians began to survive from all the "national" republics. Although, it was the Russians who brought civilization to many of these "republics". They created industry, raised agriculture, built cities, dragged them from the Middle Ages to the present. Interestingly, Mishka himself did not want to live in his "freedom", dumped him in Germany. Does he really not understand what he's done? Is he really sure that everything he has done is good for people? How is he still living with it? |
Link |