Government Corruption |
Jack Smith Will Annoy the Supreme Court |
2024-02-23 |
"I agree," replies the senator from New York. "To help us accomplish our end, I will now vote to disband the Secret Service." After the senators commit criminal conspiracy live on C-SPAN -- that’s agreeing to a crime and taking one act to accomplish it -- nothing happens. Neither get so much as much as a ticket. That’s because the senators are absolutely immune from criminal prosecution under the Constitution. The Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause provides that a congressman may not be put on trial for any "legislative act." Hence Senator Mike Gravel of Alaska could commit a grave felony in 1971 when he disclosed the top-secret Pentagon Papers. He did so at a hearing of the Senate’s Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Grounds, so no prosecutor could touch him. Had he released the papers in the hallway outside the hearing room, he’d have been in handcuffs. A president has it harder, according to Special Counsel Jack Smith. In the Justice Department’s prosecution of President Trump for contesting the 2020 election results, Smith argues that he may put Trump on trial for official presidential acts. All that’s required to arrest Trump, says Smith, is that just over half of a biased Washington, D.C., grand jury conclude that his words or deeds fall within the vague wording of a rarely charged criminal statute. In Smith’s telling, he may put a president on trial for standing in the Speaker’s Lobby off the House floor to urge congressmen to vote against certifying an election -- but because voting is a legislative act, not the congressmen who stand three feet away and actually cast the votes as urged. Smith admits that a president must be protected by at least a qualified immunity from criminal prosecution -- but he refuses to spell out exactly what that immunity is. Smith could propose an immunity covering only acts that double as political speech or petition or permitting prosecution only for clear crimes. Smith instead just swings his bat at a baseball he cannot see and declares a home run: whatever immunity a president has, he asserts, it cannot cover President Trump. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Bernie Bros warn of ‘massive exodus’ if they can't have their way |
2020-03-15 |
[NYPOST] As the presidential campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders ...The continues to crash and burn, the socialist’s most hard-core supporters are vowing they will never vote for Joe Foreign Policy Whiz KidBiden ![]() at the ballot box ‐ even if that means handing Trump a second term. "We will never ‐ NEVER boost or support Joe Biden or defend his abysmal record and terrible policy positions," Henry Williams, executive director of The Gravel Institute, told The Post. "We will tell people, as we always have, to vote their conscience and to make decisions based on the interests of all the world’s oppressed people ... I do expect a massive exodus from the Democratic Party." Williams, along with David Oks and Henry Magowan, are the driving forces behind the brief presidential campaign of Mike Gravel, an 89-year-old former Alaska senator who left the race in August. The trio then became enthusiastic Bernie Bros. "I don’t know if I could vote for Biden," said a high-profile local Democratic Socialist. "Biden is just an old white guy who inspires nobody. I sincerely think he will lose the electoral and popular vote and I know I won’t be voting for him in New York." The grumbling from Sanders die-hards is no idle threat. A whopping 12% of them voted for Trump in 2016, according to an analysis by Cooperative Congressional Election Study. That added up to roughly 216,000 voters in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, exit polls showed. Trump’s combined margin of victory in those states was 77,744. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
De Blasio makes DNC debate despite lackluster donations |
2019-06-14 |
[NYPOST] Mayor Bill de Blasio secured a coveted spot for the first Democratic presidential primary debate later this month ‐ despite his failure to get at least 65,000 donors. The Democratic National Committee released the list of the 20 candidates who will partake in the back-to-back debates on June 26 and 27 in Miami. The four contenders who did not make the cut are Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton, retired Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel and Miramar, Fla., Mayor Wayne Messam. NBC is expected to announce the lineup for each night on Friday morning. NBC will randomly select 10 candidates to go on each night. Candidates polling above 2% will be evenly split between the two events to assure there is no "undercard debate" or kids’ table. De Blasio was just one of six candidates who did not meet the donor threshold. He still qualified ‐ along with Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet, former Maryland Rep. John Delaney, former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan and Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party, Rep. Eric Swalwell ‐ by gaining at least 1% in national polls. His fund-raising failure came despite getting a little extra credit from his pals at the powerful United Federation of Teachers union, whose president sent out an 11th-hour fund-raising appeal on de Blasio’s behalf Monday morning, The Post has learned. "We want to ensure that our collective voice shapes the debate and that we hear from as many candidates as possible," UFT President Michael Mulgrew wrote in the email, a copy of which was obtained by The Post. |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
Ex-Rep. Kilpatrick 'waiting to hear' evidence of space aliens |
2013-05-01 |
![]() "Meb! Run, Beldar! They are on to us!" The bankrupt, increasingly impoverished, reliably Democrat, Detroit ...a small town in France... Democrat and mother of former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick signed up with five other former members of Congress to listen to testimony aimed at proving alien contact with Earth and a government effort to cover it up. "When my people come to colonize this planet, you will be on the protected rolls, and no harm will come to you. "You are wise, Beldar. But there is a sadness to your wisdom." "I've been interested for a while," Kilpatrick said before the kickoff of the hearings, known as the Citizen Hearing on Disclosure sponsored by the Paradigm Research Group, a private ET lobbying organization. "Take my car, its re-enforced alloy superstructure is far superior to that of your broken down, rusted out shit box." The hearing lasts through Friday at the National Press Club and will be the basis for a documentary on UFOs. For her service -- listening to about 30 hours of congressional-style testimony -- the private group will pay her $20,000 plus expenses. "When the High Master hears of this he will surely cut off my plargh and hand it to me. " Kilpatrick said she'll await the evidence before drawing conclusions on whether there's a government effort to hide existence of flying saucers. "What choice do I have? It is as if you have grabbed me by the base of my snarglies!" "I'm waiting to hear," Kilpatrick told The Detroit News as she settled on the panel before the hearings kicked off. "I'm not making any of those kinds of statements. "I have learned much from watching the Garthok battle. It has weaknesses. I believe I can take it." "Uh-huh. And let me know when Elvis gets here." "It's good to be here. We're excited. I've been reading and watching and so I'm looking forward to the week's activities." "My plubar has broken,....the birth spasm has begun!" Joining Kilpatrick on the bipartisan panel are ex-Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska (Democrat and more recently Libertarian), as well as former Reps. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., Darlene Hooley, D-Ore., Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md., and Merrill Cook, R-Utah. "Excuse me sir, but should they be in fact, creatures from another planet, isn't that the Air Force's responsibility?" "If they're just visiting, sure... but the minute they try to work here, they're mine!" Bartlett said in opening remarks Congress has failed to do its job by holding investigative ET hearings and he's pleased this private panel can do the work. If I did not fear incarceration from human authority figures, I would terminate your life functions by applying sufficient pressure to your blunt skull so as to force its collapse! |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Truthers: 'Evidence proves 9/11 story is a lie' |
2010-09-11 |
![]() A day before the ninth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth say evidence regarding the destruction of the World Trade Center towers has emerged that show pre-set explosives were used in the demolition of the buildings. Gregg Roberts, who is a member of the non-profit organization disputing the results of official investigations into the September 11 attacks, says the "official story is a lie, it is a fraud." According to experts, the Twin Towers suffered total destruction within 10-14 seconds in near free fall accelerations which can only occur as a result of pre-set demolition explosives. "There had to be explosives, there is no other way for the building to come symmetrically straight down... like a tree if you cut into the tree it falls to the side, that you cut," said Steven Dusterwald, another member of the truth seeking organization. The group also asserts that molten metal was found after the 9/11 inquiry. "Jet fuel and office fires cannot melt iron or steel. They don't even get half as hot as that and so something else was there, very energetic material that had to be placed throughout the buildings," Roberts said. "Once we take the blinders off, we can see. There are very few people in America who have taken the blinders off. So we are assisting people by showing them the evidence," said founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Richard Gage. "The 600 architects I represent are most concerned about the freefall collapse of [World Trade Center] Building 7, the third skyscraper [that was] not hit by an airplane to fall on the afternoon of 9/11...the whole building is destroyed in 6.5 seconds," the American Free Press quoted Gage as saying. World Trade Center 7 reportedly collapsed about eight hours after the main World Trade Center towers fell. The new evidence makes void the official story line that 19 al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four commercial airliners and crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth group is calling on US Attorney General Eric Holder to request a federal grand jury investigation into this alleged cover-up, which Gage calls the "largest crime of the century." "If there is a responsible party," former US Senator Mike Gravel told Press TV, "it ends with [former US President George W.] Bush and it comes down to [Former Vice President Dick] Cheney and then it comes down to the military and the various bureaucracies. No question that this kind of activity goes to the very top." |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Gravel goes insane, urges crowd to stalk federal prosecutor |
2008-08-06 |
Seems he thinks Sammy got a raw deal... Former Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel was caught on tape last week telling a crowd in Washington, D.C., that they should harass a federal prosecutor who helped bring criminal contempt charges against a Palestinian activist. Geez, we won't have a chance to vote for this guy? What a shame... In the tape, Gravel can be heard telling people to pressure Gordon Kromberg, an assistant U.S. attorney in the eastern district of Virginia, to drop the charges against Sami Al-Arian. Sure. Sammy's pure as the driven snow... Find out where he lives, find out where his kids go to school, find out where his office is, picket him all the time, Gravel said, in an audio tape obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism and provided to FOX News.Call him a racist in signs if you see him. Call him an injustice. Call him whatever you want to call him, but in his face all the time. Good move, Mike. Antagonize the Justice Department. They certainly couldn't find a way to hang you out to dry. Ask your buddy, Ted Stevens... Al-Arian is a former Florida professor who in 2006 pleaded guilty to providing goods and services to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Prosecutors had tried him on more serious charges, but that ended in a hung jury, so Al-Arian took a plea. He later was charged with contempt for refusing to testify before a grand jury in Virginia. Gravel told FOX News that he doesnt want people to break the law and that he personally wouldnt do the things hes recommended but that it could be an effective way to change the behavior of U.S. officials. Big mouth...small balls. How do you deal with this kind of an injustice? I wouldnt protest. I dont believe in protesting. I think it demonstrates the failure of representative government. My answer to that problem is, I want to empower you as a lawmaker. Dont rely on your elected officials, the former senator said. Some terror analysts dont buy that explanation. The question is whether he crossed the line in saying find out where his kids go to school, said counter-terrorism expert Steve Emerson. That to my mind and to government officials including those in the FBI crosses the line into a direct veiled threat. He said the evidence at the Al-Arian trial overwhelming showed and incontrovertibly demonstrated that he was head of the Islamic Jihad network in the United States. Krombergs boss, U.S. Attorney Chuck Rosenberg, wouldnt comment on Gravels statement, but he lauded Krombergs record in a statement.Gordon Kromberg is a dedicated, talented and scrupulously fair prosecutor. Further, when we decide to prosecute an individual, that decision is based strictly on the facts and the law, and in the pursuit of justice, period, he said. Al-Arian is still sitting in a Virginia jail. Hes also been ordered deported, but the United States still is searching for a country that will take him. Popular guy, that Sammy... |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Mike Gravel for President campaign reaches its peak |
2008-05-27 |
After two failed attempts to capture a presidential nomination, Mike Gravel says he is dropping out of politics. The former U.S. senator for Alaska made his decision after the Libertarian Party denied him its nomination Sunday. Gravel also ran in the Democratic primaries but left the party after claiming that Democrats no longer represent his values. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | |
Democrat Campaigns = Blazing Saddles? | |
2008-04-12 | |
Fred, I know we don't normally post comments from someone else's blog, but I beg your indulgence. This is eerily perceptive - and funny as hell. :-D
It's amazing how many lines from that movie work for this campaign. The first question Obama got in Iowa What's a dazzling urbanite like you doing in a rustic setting like this? Explaining the Iowa caucus to newcomers Now, I suppose you're all wondering just what in the heck you're doing out here in the middle of a prairie in the middle of nowhere in the middle of the night. Crowd: You bet your ass. Despite setbacks, Mike Gravel stays in the race No sidewindin bushwackin, hornswaglin, cracker croaker is gonna rouin me bishen cutter. Obama's campaign theme He conquered fear and he conquered hate He turned dark night into day Hillary rounds up her operatives I want rustlers, cut throats, murderers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers and Methodists. Ezra Klein hears a speech God darnit...you use your tongue prettier than a twenty dollar whore. Obama after every press appearance Ooh, baby, you are so talented! And they are so DUMB! Obama explaining his post-racial appeal Well, to tell the family secret, my grandmother was Dutch. But Hispanics are skeptical of Obama and his supporters Hast du gesehen in deine Leben? They're darker than us! The party's new reaction to Hillary Shut up, you Teutonic tw*t! The anguish of the superdelegates We've gotta protect our phoney baloney jobs, gentlemen! And of course for the current situation [Obamaramadingdong "dissing" small-town Americans] You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know... morons. Frighteningly true.... God, I miss Cleavon Little. | |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
For those of you wondering what happened to Mike Gravel... (all 3 of you) |
2008-03-26 |
Jim Geraghty, National Review Mike Gravel, once an actual senator from Alaska, last seen accusing the other Democratic candidates of being sellouts and wanting to nuke Iran, has switched to the Libertarian Party. Tough break for the Libertarian Party. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Clinton/Obama demonstrate how imitation is the sincerest form of flattery |
2008-02-01 |
I kinda liked it when they were dissing and ripping each others' eyes out, but this is much better. I guess they saw Romney and McCain going at it the other night and thought they needed to improve their act. Besides, they may need to run on the same ticket someday soon. I'd like to see a few questions on leadership styles and their philosophies about anger, conflict resolution, etc. Maybe even a question about what they think their opponenent has done right for a change. It might take a few weeks to get past the loaded answers, though. Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama spent their last debate before next week's Super Tuesday contests pointing out differences on Iraq, health care and the economy but without all of the finger-pointing that's marked their campaigns. The exchange was in sharp contrast to previous debates because of the absence of political sniping, yet was one of the most substantive policy discussions yet in the race for the nomination. On Iraq, Obama said he'd be more able to end the war because he opposed it from the beginning. He said Clinton's vote to authorize the use of force there would undermine her efforts to bring it to an end. "I think it is much easier for us to have the argument when we have a nominee who says, 'I always thought this was a bad idea this was a bad strategy,' " he said. Clinton defended her vote, saying she was told by the White House that it would be used initially to return weapons inspectors to see whether Saddam Hussein had an active weapons program. See where they stand on Iraq "I believe strongly that we needed to put inspectors in," the New York senator said. "That was the underlying reason why I at least voted to give President Bush the authority, put those inspectors in, let them do their work, figure out what is there and what isn't." Both Obama and Clinton said they support ending the war. On health care, Obama defended a plan he says would make insurance affordable to everyone who wants it, but not require everyone to buy it. The Illinois senator said his proposal would require that all children be covered and allow young people to remain on their parents' health insurance up to age 25 but would not require adults to purchase care. "Every expert who looks at it says there won't be anybody out there who wants health care who will not be able to get it," he said. Clinton, who as first lady spearheaded her husband's ultimately failed health care reform effort in the early '90s, argued that any health plan should offer universal coverage. "It is so important that as Democrats, we carry the banner of universal health care," she said. Clinton noted her experience pushing her husband's plan, saying she's best suited to hammer out the details of a new plan and create "a coalition that can withstand the insurance and the prescription drug companies." The pair praised former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, who dropped out of the Democratic race this week. Both are vying for his supporters. The Democratic race remains close going into Super Tuesday, when more than 20 states including California and New York will vote. Obama won the season-opening Iowa caucuses, then finished second to Clinton in every contest until last week's South Carolina primary which he won with a commanding 55 percent of the vote in a three-way race. Clinton scored victories in the New Hampshire primary and Nevada caucuses. She also was the top vote-getter in Florida and Michigan, although no Democrats campaigned in those states and their delegates to the nominating convention will not count because of a squabble between state and national party leaders over the timing of the primaries. Thursday's debate differed from the last time the two took to a stage together at a contentious January 21 debate in South Carolina in which the front-runners peppered each other with sharp attacks. In contrast, on Thursday the two smiled, laughed at each other's jokes and repeatedly complimented the other when they agreed. Obama got laughs when asked about how he might counter Republican charges against "tax-and-spend liberal Democrats." "Well, first of all, I don't think the Republicans are going to be in a real strong position to argue fiscal responsibility, when they have added $4 trillion or $5 trillion worth of national debt. I am happy to have that argument," he said. Clinton drew cheers when she responded to a question about how a Clinton could promote change after decades of a Clinton or Bush in power. "It did take a Clinton to clean up after the first Bush, and I think it might take another one to clean up after the second Bush," she said. The longest and loudest applause line of the night came when CNN's Wolf Blitzer noted that many Democrats have said they'd like to see a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton ticket in November. Neither ruled out the possibility of selecting the other as a running mate. "The debate was a rallying debate for Democrats," said CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider. "Democrats like both of them, they continue to like both of them, and they want to vote for both of them." Schneider said the cordial tone probably helped both candidates. Obama continued momentum from his victory in the South Carolina primary and high-profile endorsements, including Sen. Ted Kennedy and Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. Clinton probably maintained her perceived status as the front-runner. "I'm not sure that he turned the election around," Schneider said. "He is the challenger here he's got to persuade people they don't want to vote for her." The debate, sponsored by CNN, the Los Angeles Times and Politico.com, was held at Los Angeles' Kodak Theatre, where the Academy Awards are handed out. Hundreds, if not thousands, of Clinton and Obama supporters thronged outside the venue cheering and waving signs. The numerous actors, directors and musicians in the audience included Stevie Wonder, Pierce Brosnan, Rob Reiner, Jason Alexander, Isaiah Washington, Diane Keaton, Leonardo DiCaprio, Quentin Tarantino and Christina Applegate. Mike Gravel, the other Democratic presidential candidate still in the race, was not invited to participate in the debate because he did not meet certain criteria, including support in national polls. In a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll conducted January 14-17, Gravel received less than 1 percent. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
4 Democrats skipping Michigan presidential primary |
2007-10-10 |
![]() Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina -- the two top rivals to front-runner Sen. Hillary Clinton -- informed state officials they would not take part in the primary, said Kelly Chesney, a spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware also informed the state they would not participate, she said. Four other candidates -- Clinton, Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel -- had left their names on the ballot, although all the Democrats have pledged not to campaign in states that hold nominating contests early in violation of party rules. Michigan and Florida have run afoul of the Democratic National Committee by moving their nomination contests to earlier dates that conflict with the party's calendar. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Edwards: Move Past 'War on Terror' |
2007-05-23 |
Democrat John Edwards Wednesday repudiated the notion that there is a "global war on terror," calling it an ideological doctrine advanced by the Bush administration that has strained American military resources and emboldened terrorists. In a defense policy speech he planned to deliver at the Council on Foreign Relations, Edwards called the war on terror a "bumper sticker" slogan Bush had used to justify everything from abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison to the invasion of Iraq. "We need a post-Bush, post-9/11, post-Iraq military that is mission focused on protecting Americans from 21st century threats, not misused for discredited ideological purposes," Edwards said in remarks prepared for delivery. "By framing this as a war, we have walked right into the trap the terrorists have setthat we are engaged in some kind of clash of civilizations and a war on Islam." In the first presidential debate last month in South Carolina, Edwards was one of four Democratsincluding Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich and former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravelwho said they did not believe there was a global war on terror. Front-runners Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama indicated that they did. Edwards, a former North Carolina senator, voted in 2002 to authorize the invasion of Iraq but has since become a harsh critic of the conflict. In his speech, he reiterated his call to remove American combat troops from Iraq within a year and vowed to "restore the contract we have with those who proudly wear the uniform to defend our country and make the world a safe and better place." Edwards outlined several steps he said he would pursue as president to strengthen the military, including using force only to pursue essential national security missions, improve civilian-military relations, and root out mismanagement at the Pentagon. He said he would created a "national security budget" to include the activities of several agencies, including the Pentagon, Energy Department, and Homeland Security. He also said he would boost the budget for military recruiting. But Edwards saved his toughest words for the Bush administration, whom he accused of engaging in wrongheaded military adventures while abandoning U.S. "moral leadership" in the world. Because of the administration's poor stewardship, Edwards said troops were exhausted, overworked, and potentially ill-prepared for future threats. "Leading the military out of the wreckage left by the poor civilian leadership of this administration will be the single most important duty of the next commander in chief," Edwards said. The Democratic Party simply does not want to accept reality: that we are at war against a fanatical, totalitarian ideology that is absolutely determined to force us to bow down to their hateful deity. They simply refuse to accept it. May God have mercy upon us if we're stupid enough to elect one of these idiots; because the Muslims sure won't. |
Link |