Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Judiciary sets out in search of jail rape proof
2009-08-16
[Iran Press TV Latest] Amid a persistent volley of opposition allegations that protestors had been raped in Iranian prisons, Iran's Judiciary tasks a committee to obtain evidence on the claims.

Leading opposition figure Mehdi Karroubi broached the subject of "jail rape" in a letter to Head of the Assembly of Experts Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani on July 29.

In his letter, Karroubi claimed that a number of detainees had informed him that several women and men, arrested over the course of post-vote demonstrations, were 'sexually assaulted' by their jailers.

"A number of detainees have said that some female detainees have been raped savagely... teenagers held in detention have also been savagely raped," Karroubi said, adding that they were suffering from depression and serious physical injuries after the alleged assaults.

The much-criticized allegations put forward in Karroubi's letter provoked mixed reactions inside and outside the country.

Iran's former judiciary chief Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi is said to be among the many who reacted to the claims of jail rape by saying that "in detention centers under the supervision of the Judiciary, no such treatment has been carried out."

He, however, went on to urge an inquiry into the matter.

The call for investigations comes as the allegations of rape provoked strong criticism in the country.

In a sermon at Tehran University on Friday, Principlist cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami called Karroubi's claims of prison rape a "total slander against the Islamic establishment."

He went as far to call for the opposition figure's prosecution, arguing that "If someone libels the system by saying that rape takes place in prisons, then he must either prove it or, if he cannot, then the system must press charges and the public prosecutor must act."

Meanwhile, Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said earlier in the week that a special Majlis (Parliament) committee tasked with probing the situation in Iranian prisons "should also look into whether 'jail rape' allegations are true or false."

He then moved to defuse the controversy by saying "the issue of detainees being sexually abused is a lie."

"On the basis of thorough and comprehensive investigations conducted about the detainees at Kahrizak and Evin prisons, no cases of rape and sexual abuse were found," Larijani said one day after he called for a probe.

The Majlis speaker also encouraged the defeated presidential candidate to come forward with evidence proving his claims of "jail rape".

Esmail Gerami Moqaddam, a spokesman for Karroubi's National Confidence Party (Etemad-e-Melli), said the former presidential candidate's would definitely provide evidence to validate his claims of jail rape.

According to Fardanews, Ayatollah Shahroudi has called on the country's prosecutor general Qorbanali Dorri-Najafabadi to dispatch a committee to Karroubi's office to exchange views about the matter and obtain the cited evidence.

Amid the already tense political situation in Iran over claims of prison rape, Karroubi has shown no sign of letting up on the issue as he went further on Saturday making fresh claims about "prisoner abuse."
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Larijani to succeed Shahroudi as Judiciary chief
2009-08-13
After ten years in the job, Iran's Judiciary Chief Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi will be officially replaced by Mohammad Sadeq Larijani in four days' time.

Senior officials, including parliamentarians, will attend a ceremony on August 15 at the Judiciary's main reception hall to mark Shahroudi's departure and the introduction of his successor Larijani, Mehr news agency reported.

This is while earlier reports, citing several lawmakers, had said the handing-over ceremony would be held on the August 16.

Hujjatolislam Mohammad Sadeq Larijani, 48, is currently a politician cleric and a member of the Guardian Council - a 12-member supervisory body tasked with overseeing parliamentary legislations and supervision of elections.

He is also one of the five brothers of Iran's current Speaker of the Majlis (Iran's parliament) Ali Larijani. Another Larijani brother - Mohammad Javad - heads the Judiciary's human rights department.

Mohammad Sadeq Larijani also has a two-time membership of Assembly of Experts of the Leadership, an elected body that picks the leader of the Islamic Revolution, oversees his activities and has the power to remove him.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran aiming to perfect judicial system
2008-11-21
Iranian top judge, Ayatollah Seyyed Mahmoud Shahroudi, says judicial security is a precondition for a sound legal system in the country.

Iran's judiciary chief said on Thursday that popular participation, promotion of culture, and creating the superstructure of a modern judicial system are all vital in helping to attain an improved judicial system.

The three major legal systems of the world consist of civil law, common law and religious law. However, each country often develops variations on each system or incorporates many other features into the system. The pivot of Iran's judicial system is Islamic law he said.

Shahroudi also called on 'all organizations' to work together to provide security for the society and put a damper on criminal activities. "People should be informed about their civil and economic rights by the mass media and the judicial system," underscored the judiciary chief.

In a comment in June, Shahroudi said that many countries are 'envious' of Iran's progress in the judicial arena, especially the attention it pays to finding justice. He said certain characteristics of the Islamic Republic's judicial system make Iran's judicial policies 'exemplary' throughout the world.

Addressing a group of judicial officials in Tehran, Shahroudi added that the Islamic Republic's judicial system is so comprehensive that some nations have sought Iran's assistance in establishing a judicial system of their own along similar lines.
Link


Iraq
U.S. and Iraqi forces vs. Mehdi Army in eastern Baghdad
2007-08-08
Forty people have been killed in a military raid and street fighting across Baghdad's Sadr City, the capital's volatile Shiite slum, Iraqi and U.S. officials said Wednesday.
And the survivors ran away!
Iraqi and coalition troops overnight killed 32 militants in Sadr City -- most of them in an airstrike -- in an operation targeting a cell with alleged links to Iran, the U.S. military said. Twelve others were detained in the raid.
Oh my, have they lost their minds by posting body counts? Who in their civilized mind would even care to know? (Besides those of us here at RB, of course.)
Separately, fighting broke out early Wednesday between U.S.-led coalition forces and Mehdi Army militiamen in Sadr City, leaving at least eight people dead and 10 wounded, according to Iraq's Interior Ministry.
And the survivors ran away!
The U.S. military denied that civilians were among the casualties in the raid.
Nobody had time to drop their guns or claim them as relatives for the blood money?
"There were women and children in the area when we conducted the operation but none were killed in the airstrike," Army Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said, according to Reuters.

The raid and the fighting in the densely populated neighborhood were announced as Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki traveled Wednesday to meet top officials in Iran to discuss bilateral relations and security in Iraq. Some critics of al-Maliki, from the Shiite Dawa party, say he has been reluctant to take on other Shiite militants. Al-Maliki says the Iraqi military is targeting all insurgents, no matter what sect they hail from.

There is a lot of support for Iran in Sadr City. And the targeted terrorist cell is suspected of bringing weapons and the bombs called an "explosively formed penetrators" from Iran to Iraq and of "bringing militants from Iraq into Iran for terrorist training," the U.S. military said.
Well, there's at least 50 more bodies who won't be helping!
The military said the raid was built on "a series of coordinated operations" that commenced with a raid in the southern Iraqi city of Amara in June. Amara is in Maysan province in the Shiite heartland and it borders Iran. "Coalition forces continue to attack the supply chain of illicit materials being shipped from Iran," the military said.
One heck of a supply chain, isn't it?
The military was targeting an individual who "acts as a proxy between Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force and an "the Iraqi EFP network."
Great. Gotta give that intel away now, don't we? I can smell a putzer prize coming for that reporter!
"Reports also indicate that he assists with the facilitation of weapons and EFP shipments into Iraq as well as the transfer of militant extremists to Iran for training."

As troops headed to the location, "they observed two armed men in tactical fighting positions assessed to be early warning operatives for the individual targeted in the operation." Troops engaged the two and killed them, and then detained 12 militants in raids on buildings.

"During the course of the operation, the assault force and the overhead aerial support observed a vehicle and large group of armed men on foot attempting an assault on the ground forces. Responding appropriately to the threat of the organized terrorist force, close air support was called and engaged the terrorist vehicle and organized terrorist force, killing an estimated 30 terrorists," the military said.

The street fighting between the Mehdi army and the troops lasted about three hours and was fought in various locations. It was not immediately known if those killed and wounded were civilians or members of the Mehdi Army -- the militia of populist anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who enjoys widespread support among Shiites in the eastern section of the capital.
I'm sure they'll all turn out to be civilians one way or another.
The fighting came as Iraq's government moved up a vehicle ban for Baghdad from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. Wednesday. The official said the ban, which was imposed 15 hours earlier than expected, surprised residents who were headed to work and told by Iraqi security forces to return home.
Hee hee! Gotta be inconvenient as heck for the bad guys!
The ban is part of an effort, the official said, to curtail potential bomb attacks targeting the thousands of Shiite pilgrims who are trekking to a major religious shrine in the northwestern Baghdad neighborhood of Kadhimiya for an annual religious commemoration Thursday.

The insurgent activity of Shiite militias in Iraq has been a great concern to the United States, which says the Iran has provided weaponry and training for fighters in Iraq. And frequently, the U.S. military announces raids against "rogue" Shiite elements of the Mehdi Army.
Whatever is the difference between a rogue and conforming Shiite element of the Mehdi Army? Are conforming elements those who haven't been caught yet?
At the same time, there has been a diplomatic thaw between the United States and Iran Riiight. The countries have engaged in talks about security in Iraq and have formed a committee with Iraq to deal with the issue. The latest pointless meeting between the United States and Iran came on Monday.

Al-Maliki arrived with a delegation to Tehran on Wednesday after a visit to Turkey. He will meet with the top leaders of the country, including Not-So Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, President Mahmoud "Nutjob" Ahmadinejad, Judiciary Head Ayatollah "GirlsAreIcky" Mahmoud Shahroudi, Majlis Speaker "TurbanTooTight" Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, according to Iran's Government Controlled Islamic Republic News Agency.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Why Ahmadinejad Wants a New Labor Law for Iran
2007-04-28
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad appears determined to confront Iran’s increasingly restive labor movement.
Soaring unemployment, depressed wages, main street merchants aren't making money, and whatever isn't nailed down is being boosted by the Mad Mullahs -- yup, that would cause some unrest.
The showdown, begun last year, could reach a peak next week with government plans to crush International Labor Day demonstrations on May 1 by illegal trade unions. The Islamic republic has always associated May 1 with leftist ideologies and has tried to promote an alternative “Islamic Labor Day” on May 2.

This year, however, a number of illegal trade unions have announced they would hold May 1 demonstrations in Tehran and 20 provincial capitals. The newly created Workers’ Organizations and Activists Coordination Council (WOACC), a grouping of over 80 illegal trade unions claiming a total membership of over a million in 22 cities, is leading the move.

The WOACC emerged in the wake of strikes by Tehran transport workers that brought the capital to a standstill last year. The authorities succeeded to end the strike with a mixture of mass arrests and wage concessions. However, the example set in Tehran spread to other cities and industries.

The rising labor movement started with local grievances linked to wages and working conditions. In the past few months, however, it has developed a broader consciousness by highlighting issues that concern most workers. One issue that has brought the hitherto scattered illegal unions together is their opposition to President Ahmadinejad’s proposed new Islamic Labor Code. The text proposed by Ahmadinejad cancels virtually all the rights that working people have won throughout the world over centuries of social struggle and political reform. It abolishes the legal minimum wage in favor of rates fixed through agreement by employers and employees.

It also allows for the generalization of verbal employment contracts, gives employers the right to hire and fire as they please, and makes legal holidays, sick leave, and pension schemes conditional to agreements on a case-by-case basis. At the same time, it imposes a ban on independent trade unions. Instead, it proposes the creation of Islamic Guidance Councils to promote “Islamic values and sensibilities” among workers.
All of which makes clear that the Mad Mullahs, whatever their religious piety, understand the economic principles of fascism and national socialsim. The private employers are permitted to stay open on pain of doing exactly as they're told, including handing over the keys when demanded. The workers are permitted to live as long as they behave.

Now, you'd think the international progressive Left would be up in arms about this given their solidarity with the working masses. You'd be wrong.
In a detailed critique of the proposed text, the WOACC shows that the new code violates the Islamic republic’s constitution, Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and accords Iran has signed with the ILO over decades. “The proposed text is a charter for slavery disguised as an Islamic code,” a WOACC spokesman in Tehran said over the telephone last week.
Slavery is too strong a word, as is serfdom. It's fascism -- to label it correctly is to understand how it will have to be brought down.

Slavery was brought down mostly by moral and political suasion -- only in America did it require a major war. Likewise serfdom collapsed as a result of economic and political pressure -- it wasn't feasible anymore so it went away.

But fascism has always required a war to be removed.
That view is shared by some members of the Islamic Consultative Majlis who criticize Ahmadinejad for refusing to submit his text to normal parliamentary procedures. Instead, the Ministry of Labor is trying to railroad the draft law through a Majlis committee controlled by pro-Ahmadinejad parliamentarians.
Fascist dictators don't usually use a restive parliament to get things done ...
Ahmadinejad’s confrontational style in dealing with the labor movement has also been criticized by some top mullahs within the regime.

Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi, the Islamic chief justice, has warned that the government’s repressive approach could destabilize the regime. Former President Hashemi-Rafsanjani, a mullah-cum-businessman who heads the powerful Expediency Council, has called for “sensitivity” in dealing with what may be the most serious challenge the regime has faced in years.
Both of them understand how they came to power in the first place -- the tipping point against the Shah was when the small city/small town merchants were repressed to the point that they couldn't do business any more. When they went over to Khomineni, it was the end for the Shah.
Why is Ahmadinejad so determined to defy a grass-root workers’ movement by imposing an unpopular law? Part of the answer may lie in the massive privatization scheme that Ahmadinejad is expected to unveil this year. According to government sources, 44 state-owned conglomerates will be put on sale at a total price of $18 billion. These businesses employ an estimated 3.5 million people across the country. A majority of likely buyers will be mullahs and their associates, operating through supposedly religious and charitable foundations, along with officers of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
So the thugs in charge enrich themselves while making sure that the now-private businesses are controlled by the government authorities. Gullible Y'urp-peons will loan these 'private' businesses money which will further enrich the mullahs.
Although potential gold mines, most of the businesses concerned have been losing money for years, because of inefficient management and corruption. They also suffer from the fact that they have had to employ far too many people, often because of nepotism and favor distribution by powerful figures of the regime.
Which will continue because the same people will be in charge.
Under the existing Labor Code, it would be difficult for the new owners to downsize the labor force or close loss-making units. The new Labor Code would give future owners carte blanche to reorganize the businesses. According to unofficial estimates, a million people could lose their jobs under privatization. “Ahmadinejad is laying the banquet table for a big feast of plunder,” says the WOACC spokesman.
Not just plunder but control -- do as we say or the factory in your town closes. And then you'll depend on alms.
The situation is further complicated by UN-imposed sanctions that are starting to bite. Dozens of small businesses have already closed down or reduced their activities for want of credit facilities, imported parts and raw material, and fears of being shut out of foreign markets. The thousands of workers who have lost their jobs as a result plan to be in the vanguard of the May 1 demonstrations.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
New “judicial police” launched in Iran capital
2006-09-01
Tehran, Iran, Aug. 31 – Hundreds of new “judicial police” have begun to roam the streets of Tehran starting from earlier this week, even before Iran’s Majlis (Parliament) approved the dubious judicial-security body that they represent. The new organ, officially called “Judicial Services Police” (JSP), began monitoring people in the streets of the Iranian capital on Tuesday, arresting those who the judiciary suspected of “illegal activities”.

The JSP was set up by the judiciary in coordination with the State Security Forces (SSF), Iran’s paramilitary police. However, in late 2005 Majlis refused to approve a law granting it authority to carry out its work.

Among senior judicial officials who attended its inauguration at the Imam Khomeini Judicial Centre in the Iranian capital was Tehran’s chief prosecutor Saeed Mortazavi who gained infamy after it was discovered that he may have been personally responsible for the murder of Canadian-Iranian photo-journalist Zahra Kazemi in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison in 2003. “These people will be based in JSP units in police precincts and are tasked with carrying out the orders issued by judiciary officials”, Mortazavi said.
Something like a mutawa combined with a Gestapo.
The JSP is already believed to have some 800 cadre in its command, and security officials claim that the organ will soon widen its sphere of operation to cover the entire nation.

The JSP was originally set up in the early days of the 1979 Islamic Revolution but it was dismantled 10 years later and its forces distributed among the judiciary and the SSF, with officials citing an overlap of its activities and that of Iran’s other security agencies as the reason for its closure.

In recent years, the judiciary under the control of Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi had been pushing hard for it to resurface as a fully-functioning force capable of arresting those on its watch-list and placing them straight into its designated prison cells. It argued that this method would by far lead to the fastest prosecutions and sentences for offenders.
Quickest way to disappear the dissidents.
Some analysts say that it is only a matter of time before Shahroudi is replaced as Iran’s Judiciary Chief.

The deployment of the new judicial paramilitary force will likely add to the already repressive atmosphere in the streets of Tehran and may bring about a backlash of social dissent.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran: Macho Talk and Reality
2006-02-04
Amir Taheri
Until just a week ago estate agents in Tehran were marketing a housing project due to be launched at the end of the year by an Irano-Finnish company. Now, however, agents contacted over the telephone say the project has been “indefinitely postponed”. The reason? “Well, you know where the country is headed,” says one Tehran real estate dealer.

Where the country is headed, of course, is toward a possible clash with the United Nations over its alleged plans to build nuclear weapons. The clash could lead to economic and other sanctions or, if the worst comes to worst, military conflict.

The Tehran leadership under President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, however, appears confident that it can take on the UN and win.
• It has completed “emergency plans to face aggression” and is busy building a network of logistical support facilities in the western and southern provinces.

• Some $3 billion has been added to the regular defense budget in the form of a “supplement for emergency exigencies” under the direct control of the “Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei.

• The “Supreme Guide” has also created a “High Council of Military Planning” under former Defense Minister Adm. Ali Shamkhani.

• A list of “high priority” sites that might be attacked has been established and their protection against air strikes or ground sabotage operations beefed up.

• Import of “sensitive goods” has been increased to build up stocks to face sanctions.

• The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) has transferred some $8 billion of its assets from the European Union to Asia to forestall the possibility of its accounts being frozen by the EU.

• The international network of radical organizations created and supported by Iran has been put on full alert.
“The time when Muslim leaders kowtowed to powerful infidel rulers is over,” Ahmadinejad said during a meting with visiting Indonesian Parliament Speaker Agung Laksono in Tehran Tuesday. “We will pursue out goals regardless of (any) threats.”

Apart from the defensive measures already taken, Tehran has also issued a number of threats, some vague, some not. One vague threat has come from Defense Minister Mostafa Muhammad-Najjar who told a press conference in Tehran last week that Iran would “retaliate with double force” against the US and its allies in the region, presumably with missiles. Vague threats have also been made about unleashing terrorist groups against the US and its allies in the Middle East and Europe.

Tehran, however, had made two specific threats. One was to persuade the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to cut production so as to raise prices and “create economic pressure on potential aggressors.” That has not happened. In its ministerial meeting in Vienna last week OPEC decided to maintain the present production levels and work to bring prices down to $28 a barrel (as opposed to the current average of $50). This was a signal that OPEC did not wish to encourage Iran.

The second specific threat made by Tehran was the launching of a new “expanded intifada” led by Hamas and Islamic Jihad against Israel. But with Hamas now trying to form the Palestinian government it is unlikely that it would wish to become involved in an Iranian strategy. As for Islamic Jihad, the Palestinian group closest to Tehran, it is not strong enough to take both Israel and Hamas, simply to please the Iranians.

The truth is that things are not going as well for the Islamic Republic as President Ahmadinejad claims. Here are some facts that he might want to consider:
• Over the past six months an estimated $300 billion, mostly belonging to small or medium investors, has been transferred from Iran to foreign banks, especially in the Gulf states. (The chief justice of the Islamic Republic Mahmoud Shahroudi puts the figure at $700 billion).

• Over 10000 Iranian companies have moved their headquarters from Iran to Dubai, Turkey, Cyprus and even Pakistan.

• At least 10 oil companies, among them British Petroleum (UK), Baker-Hughes (US), Halliburton(US), and Conoco-Phillips(US) have either withdrawn from Iran or are winding down operations, even in the Qeshm and Kish “free zones.”

• Several major Western companies have also started their withdrawal from Iran. These include Baker-Hughes (US), Siemens(Germany), General Electric (US) and Phillips (Holland).

• Some international banks are also winding down their activities in Iran. These include Standard-Charter (UK), ABN-Amro(Holland), Credit Suisse (Switzerland), UBS (Switzerland), and the insurance brokers AON Corps.

• The US Treasury Department has revived the long forgotten Iran-Libya Sanctions Act (ILSA) and is investigating 73 European, American, Canadian and Japanese firms that do business in Iran in violation of its provisions. Many of those firms are likely to withdraw from Iran rather than face being shut out of the US market.

• Iran imports nearly 40 percent of the refined petroleum products it needs from other OPEC members, including Iraq and Kuwait. The imports could stop if the United Nations’ Security Council imposes sanctions on Iran. That would lead to a severe rationing of petrol for private and commercial use at a time that the military’s demand would be on the increase.
The perception in Tehran is that the new administration is deliberately provoking an unnecessary conflict for ideological reasons by restarting a program to process uranium at a plant in Isfahan. Iran does not have any nuclear power station, and thus does not need any enriched uranium for at least another two years.

There could be even more bad news for President Ahmadinejad even if the UN does not impose any sanctions immediately. The economic slowdown provoked by a flight of capital and the postponement of many projects has already destroyed thousands of jobs and job opportunities. It has also undermined the national currency that has lost 17 percent of its value against a basket of hard currencies since September. The Ahmadinejad administration has tried to cope by increased spending, including a depletion of the “Reserves Fund” set up by the previous government. The result is a new boost to inflationary tendencies that have been the bane of Iran’s economy since the 1970s. And that would hurt the masses of the poor most, the constituency that helped Ahmadinejad win the presidency.

Somewhere along the road, the very nuclear program over which the crisis is brewing could be in jeopardy. Iran’s imports of raw uranium, mostly from Gabon and Niger, through France, could be stopped by the UN. Iran’s own uranium deposits, believed to be among the largest in the world, would not be brought to production level anytime soon without the help of Western companies.

Iran’s nuclear program could also face difficulties from another direction. Even without specific UN sanctions, the seven-nation group of exporters of nuclear technology and equipment could decide to stop Iran from buying what it needs from them. And that could slow down the Iranian program, whether civilian or military, for years if not decades.

President Ahmadinejad’s macho talk may well sound good for propaganda purposes. But he sure needs a fallback position that he does not seem to have. The way he is going now may give the last laugh to the persons he defeated in last June’s election.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Mad mullahs already starting summer crackdown
2004-06-15
A country where lashing, amputations, eye-gouging, and stoning to death are not considered torture.
In recent years, summer in Iran has been marked by uprisings, strikes, public protests and the government’s harsh crackdown against them. There are signs this summer will be no different. As the anniversary of the anti-government uprising of July 1999 approaches, widespread arrests of dissident students and women are taking place. Some students are nabbed from their dormitories by plainclothes Revolutionary Guard agents, while many others are served arrest warrants. The US International Bureau of Broadcasting’s Radio Farda reported on May 29 that, "the persistent summoning and detention of students all over the country has caused fear and insecurity in universities."

Teheran’s Prosecutor Saeed Mortazavi has ordered a crackdown on "social corruption," saying that "a serious fight has started to tackle the spread of social corruption in society, especially the improper dress code." Youths, particularly women, are the main targets of such campaigns. These repressive actions are in line with a series of preventive measures taken by the Iranian regime to neutralize Iran’s democracy movement and to subdue an increasingly restive population.
The state-controlled daily Ressalat expressed concern over the spread of popular uprisings, stating: "Certainly, the psychological atmosphere of June and July requires the vigilance of the Hizbullah as never before."
Gonna be a long hot summer

Similar repressive measures last year gave rise to number of arrests and executions. The recent country report on human rights practices published by the US State Department says, "The [Iranian] government’s poor human rights record worsened in 2003... Continuing serious abuses included: summary executions; disappearances; torture and other degrading treatment, severe punishments such as beheading and flogging; poor prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention." According to an appalling report by the Human Rights Watch, Iran’s rulers "through the systematic use of indefinite solitary confinement of political prisoners, physical torture of student activists and denial of basic due process rights" work to silence the dissidents.
LAST MONTH, perhaps in light of the increasing concerns about Iran’s rampant human rights violations – particularly the torture death of the Iranian-born Canadian photojournalist Zahra Kazemi last summer – Iranian judiciary chief Mahmoud Shahroudi ordered a ban on the use of torture. But in Iran, torture is very much a question of definition.
Although torture had already been banned in Iran’s 1979 constitution, it remained the mullahs’ weapon of choice in dealing with dissidents. In fact, Shahroudi’s decree was an explicit admission that widespread torture continues.
Most of the practices that fall under "religious punishment" in Iran’s penal code, such as lashing, amputations, eye-gouging, and stoning to death, are banned by the Convention Against Torture. In the perverted lexicon of the mullahs, these punishments are not considered torture.
Just practicing the Religion Of Peace

Just this past weekend, the state-run daily Kayhan reported that four prisoners had been sentenced to death for "waging war on God" and "corrupting the Earth," a charge that is usually saved for political dissidents. The daily added that the right hand and left leg of two other prisoners will be amputated.
Inside prisons a religious judge can arbitrary issue an order for tazir – a religious term for physical punishment of the detainee that ranges from lashing the victim to solitary confinement and electric shock. The ban on torture, of course, does not apply to tazir. The memoir of Grand Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri, an 82-year-old senior Iranian cleric and former designated successor to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, documents many of the atrocities committed by the clerical regime.
Among the damning revelations is the text of a 1986 private letter to Khomeini. Complaining about the ill treatment of prisoners, Montazeri wrote in part: "Do you know that crimes are being committed in the prisons of the Islamic Republic in the name of Islam the like of which was never seen in the Shah’s evil regime? Do you know that a large number of prisoners have been killed under torture by their interrogators? Do you know that in [the city of] Mashad prison, some 25 girls had to have their ovaries or uterus removed as a result of what had been done to them ? Do you know that in some prisons of the Islamic Republic young girls are being raped by force?"
Despite such repression, Iran’s pro-democracy activists will be out again this summer. They will be planning the next march, rally or public protest. For them, this is more than a summer activity. It is a campaign for freedom that, by now, carries the memory of thousands who were tortured, imprisoned and killed while working for this cause. America and Europe regularly condemn Iran’s human-rights record. This summer, perhaps, they will find time to bolster Iran’s democracy movement which seeks to unseat Iran’s ruling tyrants.
Link


Axis of Evil
Iranian Majlis rep for Jews kisses Khamenei's hand...
2002-08-26
The Majlis deputy representing the Iranian Jewish population, Mauris Mo'tamed, here on Sunday expressed his appreciation of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, for his efforts to promote the rights of the Iranian Jewish minority, adding that he hoped that similar measures would be adopted in the future for cases such as "qesas" (law of retaliation), legal testimony, and inheritance laws. Speaking during the Majlis pre-debate speeches, Mo'tamed thanked the Leader for seeing to it that Iran's law was changed so that now an equal amount of blood money must be paid for the death of Jews and Muslims.
Wasn't that big-hearted of them?
He also praised Judiciary Chief Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi for his efforts to remove the problems and obstacles hindering the development of the law. The deputy also thanked the administration of President Mohammad Khatami for expediting the procedures in drawing up the relevant bill and quickly sending it to the Majlis, where the bill was passed. Mo'tamed also asked the Leader to pardon the Jewish prisoners in the southern city of Shiraz on the eve of the upcoming Jewish holiday.
And to stop coming by every Saturday evening and beating him, no doubt. Is it just me, or is there something revolting about having a system of laws that don't apply the same to everyone?
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-9 More