Down Under |
Australia's US ambassador Kevin Rudd faces calls to resign over disparaging anti-Trump comments |
2024-11-12 |
[NY Post] "Oops! Taken out of context!" Australia’s US Ambassador Kevin Rudd is facing calls to resign after his slew of disparaging comments against President-elect Donald Trump resurfaced — causing concerns over whether he’ll be able to work with the incoming president. Rudd called Trump "the most destructive president in history" and "a traitor to the West" in past tweets, as well as "a village idiot" and "incompetent" in a 2021 video interview uncovered by Sky News. "The most destructive president in history. He drags America and democracy through the mud. He thrives on fomenting, not healing, division," Rudd wrote on X in June 2020. "He abuses Christianity, church and the Bible to justify violence." Rudd hastily deleted his past tweets insulting Trump soon after it appeared likely that the Republican would cinch the election against Vice President Kamala Harris last week. But Australian officials, who are particularly concerned over Trump’s 10% tariff proposal, worry that the damage is already done — Rudd’s insults could hurt Australia’s relationship with the US under a Trump presidency. "Loose-lipped Rudd is so arrogant he actually thinks he can walk back every insult ever delivered about Trump and get away with it," The Nightly editor-in-chief Christopher Dore wrote in a Sunday opinion piece. "It is ludicrous to even contemplate keeping Kevin Rudd in Washington as our ambassador to the US," Dore argued. Michael Kroger, the former president of Australia’s Victorian Liberal Party and a frequent conservative commentator, said Rudd should do what’s best for the country and step down. "Kevin Rudd knows Australia’s best interests are not served by a ferocious critic of Donald Trump as our Ambassador in Washington," he told the Herald Sun. "For Australia’s national interests, Mr Rudd needs to hand in his commission to the Prime Minister who should then appoint a more diplomatic ambassador." Former Foreign Minister Alexander Downer told the publication that Rudd has made his own job incredibly difficult by his criticism of the US president-elect. "Kevin Rudd may find this hard to believe but he might find that Donald Trump has more on his mind than the future of Kevin Rudd," said Downer, who also served as Australia’s ambassador to the UK. Related: Kevin Rudd 11/17/2022 Trump not first politician to be ditched by Rupert Murdoch Kevin Rudd 05/05/2022 A word from the Australian Government Kevin Rudd 09/29/2021 The Collapse of Biden's World |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Trump not first politician to be ditched by Rupert Murdoch |
2022-11-17 |
[BBC] The bashing of Donald Trump by Rupert Murdoch's US newspapers looks like a familiar pattern of the Australian-born media baron turning on political leaders who are no longer useful to him. This was the confidential instruction for a political hit job issued by Rupert Murdoch in the mid-1970s to his editors, according to an American diplomat's telegram sent to the US Department of State. The target was Australia's Prime Minister Gough Whitlam. The Labour leader had been a guest at the Murdoch sheep farm outside Canberra, drawing admiring coverage in his left-leaning broadsheet The Australian. But after winning election in 1972, Whitlam stopped speaking to Murdoch, as Michael Wolff recounts in his absorbing biography The Man Who Owns the News. From that point the relationship only grew worse. Among other things, the Whitlam government dragged its feet on granting licences for Murdoch's venture into bauxite mining, before devaluing the Australian dollar, costing the media magnate in his foreign exchange dealings. In response, The Australian began assailing the prime minister's administration with suggestions of financial and sexual scandal. Murdoch himself penned articles savaging Whitlam, writes Wolff, and stared down a revolt from newsroom staff outraged by the paper's dramatic shift to the right. Ten months after that "Kill Whitlam" directive, the prime minister was dismissed by the governor general of Australia amid a budget crisis. Since Murdoch inherited Adelaide's The News 70 years ago, conjuring from these unlikely beginnings a multi-billion dollar global business empire, 18 Australian prime ministers have come and gone. Through his media megaphone, Murdoch is said to have helped overthrow a few of them, including more recently Malcolm Turnbull and Kevin Rudd. Thirteen British prime ministers and 10 American presidents, meanwhile, have taken office since Murdoch's raucous style of journalism began shaping voter opinion in the UK and US. But the Sun King, as he has been dubbed, reigns on. Former Fox News executive and chief Murdoch lobbyist Preston Padden watched his boss at close quarters as he exercised the art of political power. "The Rupert Murdoch I knew was gentlemanly, courtly," says Padden, who scheduled the media baron's meetings on Capitol Hill as he built up his television holdings in the mid-1990s. "I never heard him raise his voice. "He also gives generously. I mean, when [Senate Republican minority leader] Mitch McConnell calls Rupert and says, 'I need a million dollars for this Pac [political action committee] or that Pac', mostly Rupert complies. "Particularly the Republicans were always eager to see him. Because he's a rock star, right? I mean, the world figure." Despite Murdoch's genial manner, a sneering contempt for elected office-holders was said to lurk behind that craggy-faced smile. In 2011, Kelvin MacKenzie, editor of Murdoch's Sun during the British tabloid's heyday, told the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics following a phone-hacking scandal at Murdoch's News of the World: "Rupert told me there is nothing more gut-wrenching than a room full of politicians. "They queued up like the bloody seven dwarves to kiss his rear end." There is perhaps no greater demonstration of the awesome power wielded by the Sun than when a collapse in pound sterling forced Britain into a humiliating withdrawal from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992, as detailed in Peter Chippindale and Chris Horrie's riveting history of the newspaper, Stick It Up Your Punter! When Prime Minister John Major telephoned MacKenzie to ask how he planned to cover the story, the editor replied: "Prime Minister, I have on my desk in front of me a very large bucket of [expletive], which I am just about to pour all over you." The next-day headline, a riff on the economic turmoil and Tory sleaze, screamed: "Now we've ALL been screwed by the Cabinet." Though Murdoch says he has never asked a prime minister for anything, Sir John told a different story. He claimed the News Corp titan had badgered him at a dinner in February 1997 to rethink his direction on Europe. "It is not very often someone sits in front of a prime minister and says, 'I would like you to change your policy and if you don't change your policy my organisation cannot support you'," he told the Leveson Inquiry. Sir John said he refused. The Sun switched its backing a month later to Sir John's Labour rival, Tony Blair, who went on to win a landslide victory that spring. Blair had already flown out in 1995 to Hayman Island in Queensland, Australia, to secure Murdoch's endorsement. Australian PM Paul Keating offered some advice to Blair before that meeting. According to the diaries of former Blair spin doctor Alastair Campbell, Keating told the British Labour leader of Murdoch: "He's a big bad [expletive], and the only way you can deal with him is to make sure he thinks you can be a big bad [expletive] too." Lance Price, who was an adviser to Prime Minister Blair, says Murdoch was a de facto member of the cabinet, especially when it came to big decisions. "Tony Blair would take into account how Rupert Murdoch and his titles might respond to any policy decision that he was thinking about," Price tells the BBC. "He'd be more concerned about Murdoch, and at his reaction, than he was to the transport secretary or he would be at the secretary of state for the environment. "So in that sense, I felt that he [Murdoch] had a place in the cabinet table." Which brings us to Trump. Despite their professed friendship, Murdoch's reported contempt for his fellow New York billionaire is laid bare in Michael Wolff's fly-on-the-wall books about the Trump presidency. According to Fire and Fury, Murdoch once ended a phone call with the-then commander-in-chief by hanging up and referring to him as an idiot, adding an obscenity. The chilly shift in tone among the media baron's formerly Trump-friendly outlets has been noticeable since Republicans fizzled out in last week's midterm elections. On Tuesday night, Fox News cut away during Trump's announcement of his new White House campaign. The Wall Street Journal editorial board called Trump a "loser" and predicted certain defeat for him. The New York Post covered Trump's declaration with a bottom-of-front-page footer irreverently headlined, "Florida Man Makes Announcement". Whether the Trump equivalent of a "Kill Whitlam" directive has gone out to Murdoch's editors is not yet clear. The hostile tone is all the more remarkable bearing in mind that Trump is the first US president with whom Murdoch has been able to cultivate a friendship. But as Trump is no doubt aware, the media baron's idea of a personal connection is just as transactional as his own is often said to be. Or as one witness, in evidence to the Leveson Inquiry, said witheringly of the Murdoch media's treacherous dealings: "It's just business." |
Link |
Down Under |
A word from the Australian Government |
2022-05-05 |
|
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
The Collapse of Biden's World |
2021-09-29 |
[PJMedia] Despite his vow to "build back better," China is forcing all of Joe Biden’s moves. The Asian giant’s decision to pursue its own climate policy, consisting largely of more industrialization with green trimmings, effectively kills the Paris accords, so long a part of the progressive platform. How could it not? Beijing produces more emissions than the EU and U.S. combined. "In 2019, China’s emissions not only eclipsed that of the US — the world’s second-largest emitter at 11% of the global total — but also, for the first time, surpassed the emissions of all developed countries combined ... When added together, GHG emissions from all members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), as well as all 27 EU member states, reached 14,057 MMt CO2e in 2019, about 36 MMt CO2e short of China’s total." Not only is climate change DOA, but the post-WW2 alliance structure is in the ICU. China’s naval expansion pushed Washington to undercut the planned Australian purchase of French conventional submarines in favor of U.K.-U.S. nuclear designs. "For Mr. Macron, the [AUKUS] submarine debacle demonstrates that the NATO alliance is debilitated to the point of dysfunction through lack of trust. The glue has gone. Without transparency — and in the submarine deal there was none — alliance, in the French view, becomes an empty word." The "glue" that held NATO together was fear of the Soviet bear. But that once formidable bruin is mangy and supplanted by the much more formidable CCP dragon. The decline of European alliances reflects the strategic primacy of Asia. The irony was that up until Kevin Rudd became PM, Australia actually wanted to become part of Asia. But Chinese expansionism changed all that and stirred in the Aussie breast the old but not wholly forgotten memories of alliances with the English-speaking world. But the ultimate blow to Biden’s Global World has been to its economic underpinnings. China had been going broke gradually, then all of a sudden. "The roots of the crisis date to [Chinese] tax reforms in 1994 which bolstered central government coffers but left local governments reliant on land financing for revenue." By China’s own reckoning, the country’s vaunted economic growth rested on three huge bubbles that, once exploded, could threaten the Party’s own legitimacy. "This year, Xi has set out to reform the ’three huge mountains’ of housing, education and healthcare to rein in soaring costs for city dwellers as a way to shore up legitimacy as the ’people’s leader’, analysts said." The Communist Party encouraged the bubbles in order to tax them. But now, with the stream of new business finally exhausted and the entire edifice threatening to collapse like a house of cards, Chairman Xi has suddenly rediscovered Maoism. For a long time, analysts chalked Chinese President Xi Jinping’s homages to Mao Zedong to "political stagecraft," but a Wall Street Journal examination of Xi’s recent writings and speeches suggests they should be taking him much more seriously. It now appears Xi is "forcefully" trying to get China back to Mao’s socialist vision, the Journal writes.... "Xi does think he’s moving to a new kind of system that doesn’t exist anywhere in the world," Barry Naughton, a China economy expert at the University of California, San Diego, told the Journal. "I call it a government-steered economy." Like Indiana Jones, Xi is pursued by three giant rocks and hopes to reach the socialist bunker leaving Western markets to take the brunt of the impact. As Jason Zweig observed, it was too much to hope that Wall Street should have known better. |
Link |
China-Japan-Koreas |
Xi's desperate roll of the dice |
2021-09-28 |
American Thinker Time for some (cautious) optimism? Wall Street and the big international corporations have suddenly awakened to the threat China poses. And no, it has nothing to do with the danger China poses to American national security, the massive theft of U.S. intellectual property, the release of the Wuhan virus on the world, or even its use of Uighur Muslims in forced labor. Rather, it has to do with the threat to Wall Street profits. This is what had George Soros criticizing BlackRock's recent investments in China and the Wall Street Journal clutching its pearls. Here's the backdrop to the story. As the WSJ put it, Xi is trying to forcibly get the country back to the vision of Mao Zedong, who saw capitalism as mere transition phase on the road to socialism. Accordingly, Xi's plans call for more government intervention in the economy. Since he has consolidated power, the Chinese president is putting the entire state apparatus behind making private companies serve the state. Also, private business and the wealthy are now being "encouraged" to donate more of their wealth and profits toward Xi's "common prosperity" goals. Alibaba alone has pledged the equivalent of $15.5 billion. And Western investments in China are not being ignored by Xi.
...According to Kevin Rudd, former prime minister of Australia, Xi feels compelled to act at this time by three forces: ideology, demographics, and decoupling. As for the first, Xi is much more ideologically driven than previous Chinese leaders, except for Chairman Mao, whom Xi wishes to imitate. Xi has told party members that China's hybrid model of capitalism mixed with socialism (communism) has passed its use-by date. It's time to go full socialist (fascist). Xi is a true believer. Rudd says demographics figure large in Xi's thinking. The May 2021 census revealed that birth rates have fallen sharply, to 1.3, which is even lower than Japan's. Worse yet, China's demographic profile is upside-down — it has fewer and fewer young people with a rapidly aging population. Xi sees this as a major impediment to China's goal of becoming a major world power by the centenary of the founding of the People's Republic in 2049. Rudd goes on the say Xi wants China to selectively decouple from the West and formally present itself as a strategic rival to America on the world stage. The Chinese president talks about this being a protracted struggle lasting to the mid-century. In his mind, Xi sees all this leading to a "dual circulation economy," where reliance on exports is diminished while Chinese consumer domestic demand becomes the main driver of economic growth. Good. IMO, PLA is a lot less dangerous than destruction of Western industry by a a flood of cheap (because Chinese gov subsidized) goods. |
Link |
Down Under |
Australia's first Muslim frontbencher taunted for taking oath on Koran |
2015-01-10 |
![]() The Prime Minister's new parliamentary secretary, Ed Husic, has been subjected to online abuse for being sworn in with a Koran. Husic, the son of Bosnian immigrants,became Australia's first Muslim frontbencher on Monday when he was appointed to Kevin Rudd's ministry as Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and Parliamentary Secretary for Broadband. During the swearing-in ceremony Governor-General Quentin Bryce told Husic, "This is a wonderful day for multiculturalism, and everything it stands for in our country." However, after receiving many messages of congratulations on his Facebook page, the comments quickly turned to disgust and outrage that he chose to be sworn in on the Muslim holy book. Some called it un-Australian and unconstitutional. Ross Peace posted, "Our allegiance should have been to Queen and Country first Ed. That means saying the oath on the holy bible not the Koran.... Shame, Shame, Shame. I am so disappointed in this government that they don't have the spine to stand up for the Australian way of life." Another user, Therese Pearce, said she was "disgusted and embarrassed" for the Australian people, posting, "Hell i might just have to use snow white and the 7 dwarfs next time i take the oath for Australia." Husic has previously said that he is a moderate Muslim is not heavily involved with Muslim religious customs. In 2010 he said, "If someone asks me, 'Are you Muslim?' I say yes. And then if someone says, 'Well do you pray and go to a mosque and do all the other things that are associated with the faith?' I say no. "I often get told that I describe myself as non-practising when in actual fact I don't go round saying that. Like I just say 'I'm Muslim'." |
Link |
Down Under |
Australia election: Tony Abbott defeats Kevin Rudd |
2013-09-08 |
![]() The coalition won 88 seats to Labor's 57 in the 150-seat parliament. Liberal leader Tony Abbott, who will be prime minister, promised a competent and trustworthy government. Outgoing PM Kevin Rudd earlier admitted defeat and said he would not stand again for the Labor leadership. The main election issues were how to tackle an expected economic slowdown, whether to keep a tax on carbon emissions, and how to reduce the number of asylum seekers arriving by boat. Mr Rudd called the election after defeating Julia Gillard in a leadership challenge in June, amid dismal polling figures that showed Labor on course for a wipe-out. Under Mr Rudd, Labor initially saw its figures improve. But Mr Abbott, who enjoyed the strident support of Rupert Murdoch's newspapers, then widened the gap again. "From today I declare Australia is under new management and Australia is now open for business", Mr Abbott told a cheering crowd as he delivered a victory speech. He said that he would put the budget back into surplus, and stop boats bringing migrants from Asia. |
Link |
Down Under |
Australia to send asylum-seekers to PNG |
2013-07-20 |
Asylum-seekers arriving by boat will no longer be resettled in Australia but will go to Papua New Guinea, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has announced. Australia has seen a sharp rise in the number of asylum-seekers arriving by boat in recent months. Following the news, rioting reportedly broke out at an asylum centre in Nauru. It was unclear if there was a link. The cause of the disturbance, involving 150 detainees, had not been established, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) added. Mr Rudd had said the "hard-line decision" was taken to ensure border security. It was also aimed at dissuading people from making the dangerous journey to Australia by boat. "Our country has had enough of people-smugglers exploiting asylum-seekers and seeing them drown on the high seas," he said. The deal - called the Regional Settlement Arrangement - was signed by the Australian and PNG leaders on Friday. Mr Rudd, who ousted Julia Gillard as Labor Party leader amid dismal polling figures last month, made the announcement in Brisbane flanked by PNG Prime Minister Peter O'Neill. "From now on, any asylum-seeker who arrives in Australia by boat will have no chance of being settled in Australia as a refugee," Mr Rudd said. Under the agreement, new arrivals will be sent to PNG - which is a signatory to the United Nations Refugees Convention - for assessment and settled there if found to be a refugee. To accommodate the new arrivals, an offshore processing centre in PNG's Manus island will be significantly expanded to hold up to 3,000 people. No cap has been placed on the number of people Australia can send to PNG, Mr Rudd said. "The new arrangements will allow Australia to help more people who are genuinely in need and help prevent people smugglers from abusing our system." The rules would apply to all those arriving in Australia by boat from today, Immigration Minister Tony Burke said. In return, Australia is to channel aid to PNG, including to a major regional hospital and the university sector, The Australian reported. No costs were disclosed in connection with the deal. Boat arrivals have soared in the past 18 months, with most asylum seekers coming from Iraq, Iran, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. They make their way to Indonesia and from there head to Christmas Island, the closest part of Australian territory to Java. They travel in boats that are often over-crowded and poorly-maintained. Several have sunk in recent months, killing passengers. Last year, the Australian government reintroduced a controversial policy under which people arriving by boat in Australia are sent to camps in Nauru and Papua New Guinea for processing. |
Link |
Down Under |
Australia foreign minister quits |
2012-02-23 |
CANBERRA: Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd resigned on Wednesday, saying he could no longer work with Prime Minister Julia Gillard, stoking speculation he will challenge her for the leadership and plunging the government into a new crisis. Gillards minority government has sunk in popularity as Gillard and Rudd, whom she ousted in 2010, have waged a personal feud that has split their Labour Party and alienated voters. They differ little on policy, but the battle described by Rudd as a soap opera threatens to trigger an early election and a defeat for Labors economic reform agenda, including major mining and climate change legislation. Senior ministers had in the past week urged Gillard to sack Rudd due to the leadership speculation and increasing animosity between the two camps. The simple truth is I cannot continue to serve as foreign minister if I do not have Prime Minister Gillards support, Rudd told a news conference in Washington. The only honorable course of action is for me to resign. Rudds supporters believe only he can stem hemorrhaging voter support to opposition leader Tony Abbott and his conservative coalition, which holds a strong lead in opinion polls. But a move back to Rudd risks losing the backing of independents who give the minority Labor government a one-seat majority. |
Link |
Down Under |
Australia to follow EU lead on Iran sanctions |
2012-01-25 |
LONDON: Australia will follow the European Union's lead in banning oil imports and imposing a range of other sanctions on Iran, Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd said on Tuesday. Rudd said later that Australian imports of Iranian oil were already "negligible." "On the question of Iran, let me be absolutely clear (regarding) the actions taken in Brussels yesterday on sanctions by the European Union we in Australia will undertake precisely the same parallel action for Australia," he told reporters during a visit to London. Rudd said a message needed to be sent to the Iranian government that its behavior was "globally unacceptable." He said Australian exports to Iran had "declined massively" because of previous rounds of sanctions. "So this is not a piece of idle philanthropy on the part of Australian foreign policy. This costs, but it is a cost worth paying," he told a news conference after talks between the British and Australian defence and foreign ministers. |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Australia Says ICC Must Try Assad for 'Atrocities' |
2012-01-20 |
[An Nahar] Australia urged Syrian Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneckal-Assad Light of the Alawites... to step down on Thursday and said he should be tried before the ![]() ... where Milosevich died of old age before being convicted ... for "atrocities" against his people. "Our view in Australia is that Assad must go," Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd told news hounds at the French foreign ministry in Gay Paree, at a joint appearance with his counterpart Alain Juppe. "Our view in Australia is in fact his case is worthy of referral to the International Criminal Court, given the level of atrocities we have seen. As we speak, further atrocities are being committed," he said. Juppe said that an Arab League ...an organization of Arabic-speaking states with 22 member countries and four observers. The League tries to achieve Arab consensus on issues, which usually leaves them doing nothing but a bit of grimacing and mustache cursing... observer mission to Syria, where Assad's forces are putting down a pro-democracy street revolt and clashing with armed rebels, was "in difficulty" and not being allowed to work. "Syria is not respecting the undertaking it gave to the vaporous Arab League to withdraw its troops to barracks," he said, saying a report from the observers should be submitted to the U.N. Security Council for further action. A popular revolt against Assad's authoritarian rule erupted in Syria in March in the wake of similar uprisings across the Arab world. It has descended into violence as the regime cracks down and rebel groups emerge. |
Link |
Down Under |
Diplomatic Foul Up Between Australia-India-US |
2011-12-01 |
India is not aware of a proposal to enter into a security pact with the United States and Australia, the foreign ministry said on Thursday, pouring cold water on statements made by Australia's foreign minister. Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd said in an interview with the Australian Financial Review newspaper on Wednesday that he backed the creation of a trilateral security deal and that the response from the Indian government had been "positive. "We have seen media reports about the comments attributed to the Australian Foreign Minister Mr. Kevin Rudd on a possible three-way economic and security pact with the U.S. and India. We are not aware of any such proposal," India's foreign ministry spokesman said in a statement on its website. Talk of such a pact could fuel China's worries of being fenced in by wary neighbors. It was unclear why Rudd, a Mandarin-speaking Sinophile, would risk irritating Australia's top trade partner China which is already nervous that U.S. President Barack Obama's latest diplomatic push into the Asia-Pacific is part of broader U.S. policy to encircle it. But Rudd earlier this month said Australia's security arrangements with the United States were not "snap-frozen in time," and while China wanted to see the elimination of U.S. alliances in East Asia, Australia disagreed. Indian defense analyst Uday Bhaskar has said India was unlikely to enter into such a pact, partly out of reluctance to risk riling China, and partly because of its long history of keeping out of such arrangements. |
Link |