Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Government Corruption
‘Elderly Man with a Poor Memory': Devastating DOJ Report Says Biden ‘Did Not Remember When He Was Vice President' and ‘When His Son Died'
2024-02-09
[Mediaite] President Joe Biden will not be charged over his retention of government documents, Special Counsel Robert Hur announced on Thursday. In doing so, Hur stated that if Biden were charged, the president could present to a jury “as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”

Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Hur as Special Counsel last year after lawyers for Biden informed the government that the president was in possession of classified documents from his days as a senator and vice president. Hur concluded that Biden “willfully retained” the classified material.

Hur’s report describes Biden’s memory in damning terms, at one point stating that it “appeared to have significant limitations.” The report recounts a recorded 2017 conversation with Mark Zwonitzer – who helped Biden write two memoirs – in unflattering terms:

Mr. Biden’s recorded conversations with Zwonitzer from 2017 are often painfully slow, with Mr. Biden struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries.

In his interview with our office, Mr. Biden’s memory was worse. He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (“if it was 2013 – when did I stop being Vice President?”), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (“in 2009, am I still Vice President?”). He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died. And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him. Among other things, he mistakenly said he “had a real difference” of opinion with General Karl Eikenberry, when, in fact, Eikenberry was an ally whom Mr. Biden cited approvingly in his Thanksgiving memo to President Obama.

Hur’s report stated that due to the aforementioned limitations, a jury would likely see Biden as a sympathetic figure if he were criminally charged:
And there you have, a Hur decision. No actual need for a jury, he knew how they would decide.
We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory. Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him by then a former president well into his eighties of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.
Link


China-Japan-Koreas
Obama-Biden Afghan Ambassador Is Now A China-Funded Academic Tied To Influence Groups ‘Neutralizing' Beijing's Enemies.
2021-09-21
[National Pulse] Karl Eikenberry — a former Ambassador to Afghanistan under President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden — now collaborates with several Chinese Communist Party-funded influence groups seeking to "co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition" to the regime and works for a state-run university in China, The National Pulse can reveal.

The sole political appointee to fill the role in the Obama-Biden years, Eikenberry served as Ambassador to Afghanistan from 2009 to 2011. His appointment followed his service as a Lieutenant General in the U.S. Army focusing on Afghanistan, overseeing the training of the now-defunct government’s army and police forces.

Since his departure from the role, Eikenberry has affiliated with several Chinese Communist Party-run institutes and initiatives.

In addition to serving as a senior advisor to the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Defense, he doubles as a Visiting Professor at Schwartzman College housed at Tsinghua University. The alma mater of Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping, Tsinghua University has a history of launching cyberattacks against the U.S. government.

Tsinghua also has a "clear connection between them and the state administration for technology and industry in discussions on what [they] can do to help the national security," according to former Senior Intelligence Officer in the Defense Intelligence Agency and State Department Official Nicholas Eftimiades.

Similarly, Eikenberry is an International Security fellow at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC). The National Pulse has previously highlighted the center’s deep collaboration with several Chinese military and government-linked entities, including those flagged by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for espionage and blacklisted by the U.S. government.

Eikenberry is also part of a working group based at the University of California San Diego’s (UCSD) 21st Century China Center, which is predominantly funded by the co-founder of the e-commerce giant Alibaba. The China-based firm has close financial and personnel ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its military. It has been flagged as a "tool" of the Chinese Communist Party by the U.S. State Department.

Beyond academia, Eikenberry has also participated in dialogues at the East-West Institute sponsored by the China-United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF). The organization was founded by the Vice-Chairman Chinese Communist Party’s "United Front," an effort that seeks to "co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition to the policies and authority of its ruling Chinese Communist Party" and "influence foreign governments to take actions or adopt positions supportive of Beijing’s preferred policies."

Another event sponsor — the China Association for International Friendly Contact (CAIFC) — has been flagged by the U.S. government as a United Front group operating under the auspices of China’s military.
Related:
Karl Eikenberry: 2020-08-07 $15M of Kabul Bank’s Stolen Funds Recouped Last Year: Govt
Karl Eikenberry: 2014-04-14 How Obama Lost Afghanistan
Karl Eikenberry: 2013-11-11 Afghani interpreters who helped U.S. denied visas
Link


Afghanistan
$15M of Kabul Bank’s Stolen Funds Recouped Last Year: Govt
2020-08-07
[ToloNews] The Kabul Bank Recovery Department has recovered more than $15 million of the bank’s embezzled funds over the last year, much of which was from Khalilullah Frozi, the former CEO of the bank.

According to Rohullah Habib, head of the Kabul Bank Recovery Department, $987 million is the total amount lost during the scandal, of which he said "$400 million has been recovered so far." Recovery of the remaining amount is "in process."

Habib clarified that $61 million has been collected out of the $272 million owed by Sher Khan Farnood, the founder and former head of the Kabul Bank who died in prison in August 2018. He was accused of being among the top embezzlers.

According to Habib, Khalilullah Frozi owes $196 million to Kabul Bank and has paid $14 million to the department.

Frozi, however, told TOLOnews on Tuesday that he had paid $17 million to the government along with properties "worth millions."

Habib called the recovery of Kabul Bank funds a "complicated process" and time-consuming.

"He (Frozi) has not paid cash since his release from prison. From his seven properties in total, three of them are worth $8. 9 million and the four remaining properties are under review by the recovery department," Habib added.

Talking to TOLOnews on Tuesday, Frozi said: "We have paid a portion of the money--$17 million. We have handed over the Dosti township that was our property and the government has sold it for Afs600 million ($7.8 million)," Frozi said, adding that he has also given to the government properties such as "16 jeribs (7.9 acres) of land on the Airport Road, 7 jeribs (3.4 acres) of land in Makrorayan area (in Kabul), 50 jeribs (24.7 acres) of land in Karte Naw (area in Kabul), and two jeribs (0.9 acres) of land near Poland's embassy."

"The issue was political, the issue was the big controversy of the former president Karzai and the US embassy. It was a consequence of the intervention of former US ambassador Karl Eikenberry
...retired United States Army Lieutenant General who served as U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan...
. Kabul Bank paid the price for pressure that the US put on Karzai and Kabul," added Frozi.

The court recognized Sher Khan Farnood, the founder and chairman, and Khalilullah Frozi, as well as a number of other individuals and companies, as owing back large sums to Kabul Bank, but Farnood died in prison two years ago.

"The basis of the process was wrong. The former head of the Central Bank, Mr. Abdul Qadir Fitrat, has done wrong and has acted in contravention of the law. We are not saying that nothing was done in Kabul Bank, but it could be solved in simpler ways. But they [Kabul Bank Recovery Department] still has not been able to collect the debts," said Sulaiman Toofan.

Kabul Bank, the largest private bank in Afghanistan, was established in 2004 by Sherkhan Farnood; But after it went bankrupt, the government took over the bank in 2010. Watchdogs have criticized the government for failing to recoup the bank's stolen assets after nine years.
Related:
Khalilullah Frozi: 2015-12-05 Ghani Condemns Stoning And Lashing of Ghor Girls
Khalilullah Frozi: 2015-11-09 Frozi Bribed Officials For Housing Project: MP
Khalilullah Frozi: 2015-11-08 Ghani Cancels Controversial Project With Kabul Bank Criminal
Related:
Kabul Bank: 2018-08-29 Kabul Bank’s former CEO shifted from Bagram prison after Farnood’s death
Kabul Bank: 2018-05-28 Bank director and 3 workers shot dead by own guard in Uruzgan province
Kabul Bank: 2017-08-30 Suicide bomber kills 5 near US embassy in Kabul
Link


Afghanistan
How Obama Lost Afghanistan
2014-04-14
Despite the violence and uncertainty surrounding this Saturday's election for a new Afghan President, there's one positive Hamid Karzai, the sitting president and the architect of much of the country's unrest, is not on the ballot this time. But while Karzai must cede power under the rules of the Afghan constitution, the other leader whose mismanagement helped tank Afghanistan abandoned his influence in what he once called "the right war" a long time ago. That leader is President Barack Obama.

The best scenario is a May run-off between the two top candidates the opposite of the chaos of 2009 that left Karzai with a third term. Instead of a statesmanlike exit as father of a new democracy, Karzai's re-election imploded his already troubled legacy. On an election day the UN characterized as Afghanistan's worst episode of violence in fifteen years, Western diplomats accused Karzai and his cronies of at least 100,000 fictitious ballots and over 800 fake polling sites. Some level of corruption is to be expected in a post-conflict war zone, but the rancorous back and forth between Karzai and the Obama administration was a disastrous turning point. Dismissing voting irregularities as "totally fabricated," Karzai dedicated his next five years to severing his relationship with the United States. Always a pacifist a nuance neglected when drafting plans for a more aggressive war strategy Karzai went increasingly public with his anger over civilian casualties, night raids and what he saw as American rejection to take the fight to Pakistan.

Yet for all of Karzai's failings, the Obama administration's craven politics and unrealistic expectations hastened the decline. Immediately after Obama's election, administration officials stressed the need for a "credible partner" in Afghanistan, ignoring the reality that Karzai would likely win even without widespread cheating. To make good on his strong campaign condemnation of the Bush administration failures in Afghanistan, Obama ordered an additional 20,000 troops, then another 30,000, almost doubling the size of the American forces in Afghanistan to nearly 100,000. Obama actually didn't want to surge the troops he took over three months to make the decision to do so but feared political fallout for denying the request of the brass.The additional troops were supposed to "create the space for governance." The strategy depended on Karzai's potential as a leader, but Obama would not play the role of mentor and would not speak with Karzai directly. It didn't work. Already before the contested election, Obama outsourced 'the job against Al Qaida in Afghanistan' to deceased Special Envoy Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, Vice-President Joe Biden, and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry. Though the commander-in-chief should delegate as much as possible, wartime relationships matter. It was a slight from which Karzai would never recover.

Mood stabilizers were yanked for shock therapy. Instead of tolerating Karzai's bipolar mania for his occasional lucidity and cooperation, the Obama model of diplomacy became to antagonize its critical partner. Pander to the very worst of your own and Karzai's personality, to the detriment of the men and women you expect to fight a war you don't believe in (not to mention the men, women, and children who have to live in the world you've wrought in their backyards). If political elites with base similarities in wealth, power, and prestige can't find any common ground, counterinsurgency didn't have a prayer.

Obama made clear where he stood when he quickly undercut his $120 billion investment by announcing a drawdown. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates observed a preoccupation with exit over strategy. "The president doesn't trust his commander, can't stand Karzai, doesn't believe in his own strategy and doesn't consider the war to be his," wrote Gates in his memoir. "For him, it's all about getting out."

Afghanistan today is much more violent than when Obama came into office. Fewer Americans may be dying. But many more Afghan civilians are being killed, according to U.N. statistics. More guns, more warlords, more militias that's Obama's probable legacy. It's what happens when you can't deal with reality and commit one way or the other in wartime you lose.
Link


Afghanistan
Afghani interpreters who helped U.S. denied visas
2013-11-11
KABUL — A growing number of Afghan interpreters who worked alongside American troops are being denied U.S. visas allotted by Congress because the State Department says there is no serious threat against their lives.
Meanwhile we allow tens of thousands of mostly ungrateful Somalis to settle in the U.S. as refugees. Once again Barack Obama makes clear his politics: disdain and abandonment of our friends and embracement of our enemies.
But the interpreters, many of whom served in Taliban havens for years, say U.S. officials are drastically underestimating the danger they face. Immigration attorneys and Afghan interpreters say the denials are occurring just as concerns about Taliban retribution are mounting due to the withdrawal of U.S. forces.

“There are tons of Talibs in my village, and they all know that I worked with the Americans,” said one interpreter, Mohammad, who asked that his last name not be published for security reasons. “If I can’t go to the States, my life is over. I swear to God, one day the Taliban will catch me.”

Mohammad received a U.S. form letter saying he had failed to establish that there was a “serious threat” against his life. He had explained in his application that the Taliban had spotted him on the job and spread word in his village that he was a wanted man.
You'd think that would be enough...
In one particularly dangerous assignment, he was asked to mediate between U.S. soldiers and locals after an American convoy ran over and killed an Afghan child, he said.

In the initial phase of the visa process, “an applicant has to establish that he or she has experienced or is experiencing an ongoing serious threat as a consequence of employment by or on behalf of the U.S. government,” said Robert Hilton, a spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.
Who, I imagine, has never been outside the compound his entire tour...
He said the applications were examined by an embassy committee, which decided whether they should move forward to Washington. Hilton and other U.S. officials would not explain what constitutes a “serious threat” or respond to specific cases in which applicants were denied visas.

Another interpreter who was denied a visa had worked for years at a U.S. military prison, screening visitors. U.S. military officers wrote several letters stating that his job put him in particular danger because of his constant contact with the families of detained militants. But the State Department review board said those concerns didn’t amount to a “serious threat,” the man said.
And of course the embassy people wouldn't believe our military...
A third interpreter who received a similar denial, and gave only his partial name, Naseri, had survived three attacks by improvised bombs on the military units he accompanied during a five-year stint. He said he explained in a visa interview at the U.S. Embassy that he’d been called a “spy and a traitor” while on patrol with his American unit and that the Taliban knew where he and his family lived. This year, he said, someone called his father and threatened to kill members of his family.

Several U.S. military officers wrote letters to the State Department about the role Naseri played.

“Every house we went into, he went into. Every firefight we went into, he went into,” said Lt. Matt Orr, who worked with Naseri in one of the most dangerous corners of eastern Afghanistan. He said he was baffled when Naseri received his denial.

“I feel a real sense of frustration with the bureaucratic mess that would do something like this,” Orr said.

Afghan interpreters who work with the U.S. military generally wear masks and assume phony American names to disguise their identities. But they say the Taliban often hears about their association with American forces, particularly if they are from small villages where the insurgency has influence.

One former U.S. Marine interpreter named Mustafa was kidnapped and killed outside Kabul in August. His colleagues said he had completed his visa interview several days before his death. A photo of his body circulated on the page of a Facebook group interpreters use to exchange information about their visa applications.

Since the program’s inception four years ago, 1,648 interpreters have received the Special Immigrant Visas, or SIVs, out of the 8,750 allocated by Congress.

The program has been dogged by delays and other problems. The State Department was criticized this year for temporarily revoking one interpreter’s visa without explanation and for denying other applicants based on vague accusations that they were affiliated with terrorist groups.

But the most recent spate of denials could affect a broader range of interpreters. They go to the core reason the program exists — the threat facing Afghan men and women who worked for the U.S. government here.
The core reason for the program is honor: we have to take care of those who risk their lives to help us. Otherwise no one in the world will help us. I suspect there are people at Foggy Bottom -- and above -- who are fine with that...
Supporters of the program in Congress expressed anger at the latest controversy to hit the program.

“I am deeply concerned about recent reports that the threat posed to interpreters by Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan are being downplayed or disregarded,” said Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), a veteran of the Afghan war, when asked for reaction. “The current process for approving visas threatens to undermine the commitment we made to stand with them.”

“We have to keep our promise to individuals who risked their lives serving alongside our troops. Failing to act puts lives at further risk and hurts our credibility around the globe,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).

More than 6,000 Iraqis have received visas through an analogous program over the past five years. Immigration attorneys representing interpreters from both countries say the “serious threat” denials have been issued only to their Afghan clients.

“For the past few months, we have been seeing an alarming number of Afghan SIV applicants denied by Embassy Kabul for allegedly ‘not facing a threat,’ ” said Becca Heller, the director of the Iraqi Refugee Assistance Project, which represents both Iraqi and Afghan clients.

“These are people being hunted down by Taliban forces because of their work with the United States,” she said. “Many of them have been shot at or kidnapped, and others have hard evidence in the form of death letters and death lists from the Taliban.”

Some worry that the United States is denying the visas in order to prevent talented, English-speaking interpreters from leaving Afghanistan. Those men and women would be assets to any long-term American presence in the country, some U.S. officials have said in the past.
Not if they're dead...
“This act could drain this country of our very best civilian and military partners: our Afghan employees,” former ambassador Karl Eikenberry wrote in a February 2010 cable to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton that was obtained a year later by the Associated Press. He went on to warn that the program could “have a significant deleterious impact on staffing and morale, as well as undermining our overall mission in Afghanistan. Local staff are not easily replenished in a society at 28 percent literacy.”

Interpreters whose visa applications are being denied say they are puzzled by the standards being used.

“What’s a serious ongoing threat for them? Do they need someone to bring in my decapitated head?” said another interpreter, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity for security reasons. “The Taliban posted a letter on our house saying next time I come inside my house, they will kill my whole family. That’s still not good enough?”
Link


Afghanistan
Can We Say At Last There is Sanity at The Washington Post ?
2012-10-27
Look at what the WP is reporting on today Somebody must have died in the PC reporting desk
Facing Taliban threats, Afghan interpreters wait for U.S. visas

KABUL -- Of the more than 5,700 Afghans who have applied for U.S. visas under a special program tailored for those who have supported the American war effort, just 32 have been approved, the State Department says, leaving the rest in limbo as foreign forces begin their withdrawal.
Sounds like South Vietnam all over again...
The growing, protracted backlog threatens to undermine congressionally approved legislation, as well as the longstanding guarantee that the United States will protect Afghans whose contribution to the American mission has left them hunted and vulnerable.

In 2009, the Afghan Allies Protection Act allocated 7,500 visas for Afghans employed by the U.S. government, mostly as military interpreters. The legislation was intended to respond to a prospect that the interpreters knew well: Without a swift escape route, they would be high-priority targets for the Taliban after the American war effort draws down.

But the channel established by Congress has been far from swift. Some interpreters say they have waited years with hardly a word from the State Department about their applications. The U.S. embassy's visa office in Kabul has been badly understaffed, according to immigration attorneys who have worked on interpreters' cases.

The long wait has been disheartening to thousands of men and women critical to the American mission, many of whom serve on the front lines with U.S. troops. Since 2007, at least 80 interpreters have been killed in combat.

Until late 2011, the U.S. Embassy in Kabul did not process a single visa under the Afghan Allies program, according to the State Department. Before then, interpreters were asked to travel to Islamabad -- a precarious journey for Afghans working with the U.S. military -- to complete their applications. Even there, few visas were granted.

U.S. officials acknowledge that the program was not prioritized in the years after its establishment.

"We didn't plan for an increase in staffing or resources . . . and there was a pent up demand," said one U.S. embassy official who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

But after a slow start, U.S. officials say they now have the resources to handle the backlog.

"It's absolutely a top priority for us now," the U.S. official said.

When the Afghan Allies program was established, members of Congress said there was urgency behind the legislation. But some officials at the U.S. embassy in Kabul expressed concern that that program could remove from Afghanistan talented local employees at a time they were sorely needed.

"This act could drain this country of our very best civilian and military partners: our Afghan employees," former Ambassador Karl Eikenberry wrote in a February 2010 cable to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton that was obtained a year later by the Associated Press. He went on to warn that the program could "have a significant deleterious impact on staffing and morale, as well as undermining our overall mission in Afghanistan. Local staff are not easily replenished in a society at 28 percent literacy.
Link


Afghanistan
Afghan Forces Unable to Take Security Responsibility in Panjsher
2011-07-07
Afghan cops are unable to take responsibility for security in Panjsher province, one of the seven handover areas, local officials said on Wednesday.

General Mohammad Qasim Jangalbagh, Panjsher police commander said as Panjsher province is bordered by insecure provinces, after the foreign troops' withdrawal the province will face many challenges.

"Due to limited number of forces in Panjsher, we cannot take the security responsibility for this province. And because Panjsher is bordered by insecure provinces, we need a huge force," Mohammad Qasim said.

However,
some men learn by reading. A few learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves...
Panjsher governor, US ambassador in Kabul and security transition chief accepted that there could be challenges after foreign troops withdraw, but said that Afghan cops will be able to take the security responsibility for the province.

"We are facing some challenges in security of Panjsher province, and lack of police forces. But we try to solve these challenges in cooperation with Ministry of Interior Affairs," Keramuddin Karim, Panjsher governor said.

Meanwhile,
...back at the buffalo wallow, Tex and his new-found Indian friend were preparing a little surprise for the bandidos...
security transition chief, Dr Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai said that after the withdrawal, International Community's aid to Afghanistan will be decreased.

"The world will decrease its aid, because the International situation is changing and due to that our responsibility for protecting our national interests are increasing too. We should know the situation clearly," Dr Ahmadzai said.

But US ambassador in Kabul, Karl Eikenberry
...retired United States Army Lieutenant General currently serving as U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan...
, said it is important that Afghans take the responsibility for security.

"In the years ahead now, What the Afghan people I believe aspired for is now they want their own illusory sovereignty; they have the confidence of standing on their foundation and increasingly now they want to be providing for their own security. They want their own government to be in charge," Mr Eikenberry said.

US President Barack B.O. Obama has announced that in the next summer about 33,000 US troops will be withdrawn from Afghanistan. Panjsher is among 7 provinces where Afghan cops are to undertake security responsibilities.
Link


Afghanistan
Pakistan denies firing rockets into Afghanistan
2011-06-28
[Dawn] Pakistain on Monday denied accusations by Afghanistan that it fired hundreds of rockets into two eastern Afghan provinces over the past three weeks, killing 36 people, including 12 children.

Military front man Major General Athar Abbas
... who is The Very Model of a Modern Major General...
said no rounds have been intentionally fired into Afghanistan. He said it is possible that a few rounds may have accidentally fallen into Afghanistan when security forces targeted bully boyz carrying out cross-border attacks into Pakistain.

The back-and-forth accusations have further strained the troubled relationship between the two countries. The Afghan government has repeatedly criticised Pakistain for not targeting Afghan Talibs who use its territory to launch cross-border attacks.

Pakistain has recently reversed this criticism, saying Afghan and NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
forces have not done enough to target Pak Talibs who have established sanctuaries in eastern Afghanistan and are using them to attack Pakistain.

The Afghan and Pak Taliban have close links but different goals. The Afghan Taliban is focused on fighting NATO and Afghan troops in Afghanistan. The Pak Taliban's main goal is toppling the US-allied Pak government.

Abbas claimed there have been five cross-border attacks in the last month against Pak border posts that have killed 55 paramilitary soldiers and tribal coppers and injured 80 others. The attacks took place in the tribal areas of Bajaur and Mohmand
... Named for the Mohmand clan of the Sarban Pahstuns, a truculent, quarrelsome lot. In Pakistain, the Mohmands infest their eponymous Agency, metastasizing as far as the plains of Beautiful Downtown Peshawar, Charsadda, and Mardan. Mohmands are also scattered throughout Pakistan in urban areas including Bloody Karachi, Lahore, and Quetta. In Afghanistan they are mainly found in Nangarhar and Kunar...
and in the settled area of Dir, he said.

"The fleeing bully boyz were engaged by the security forces, and a few accidental rounds going across (into Afghanistan) cannot be ruled out," Abbas said.

Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
... A former Baltimore restaurateur, now 12th and current President of Afghanistan, displacing the legitimate president Rabbani in December 2004. He was installed as the dominant political figure after the removal of the Taliban regime in late 2001 in a vain attempt to put a Pashtun face on the successor state to the Taliban. After the 2004 presidential election, he was declared president regardless of what the actual vote count was. He won a second, even more dubious, five-year-term after the 2009 presidential election. His grip on reality has been slipping steadily since around 2007, probably from heavy drug use...
on Sunday accused Pakistain of firing 470 rockets into the eastern provinces of Kunar and Nangarhar
...on the main road from Lovely Peshawar. The capital is Jalalabad. The population of 1,334,000 consists mostly of Pashtuns with a few Arabs and Pashais...
and said "they should be stopped immediately."

And "if they are not being carried out by Pakistain, Pakistain should make it clear who is behind the attacks," he said in a statement issued by the presidential palace.

The Mighty Pak Army has said the recent cross-border attacks came from Kunar, an area where NATO has recently withdrawn many of its combat troops.

Karzai said he discussed the rocket barrage with President Asif Ali President Ten Percent Zardari
... sticky-fingered husband of the late Benazir Bhutto ...
during an anti-terrorism conference in Tehran on Saturday, the same day the Afghan Defence Ministry front man spoke of the attacks and warned that Afghanistan would defend itself.

"The government of Pakistain should understand that there will be a reaction for killing Afghan citizens," said front man Mohammad Zahir Azimi.

Saying it was in response to Pak fire, Afghan cops in the eastern provinces of Khost and Paktika
...which coincidentally borders South Wazoo...
launched artillery across the border at least twice on Friday, Azimi said.

Afghan security officials said NATO also fired into Pakistain on June 17. NATO and Pak military officials earlier denied any knowledge of such border fire from the Afghan side.

The Afghan president said he also discussed the border attack with Afghan NATO commander Gen. David Petraeus and US Ambassador Karl Eikenberry
...retired United States Army Lieutenant General currently serving as U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan...
during his regular national security council meeting on Sunday.

Afghan border police front man Edris Mohmand, who reported 36 Afghans killed by the rockets, including 12 children, said 2,000 families have decamped the Asmar and Nangalam districts of Kunar province
... which is right down the road from Chitral...
and the Goshta district in Nangarhar.

"All these attacks have been from Pakistain's side and for sure they are Pak weapons being used against innocent Afghans," Mohmand said. "The border police in the eastern region have been equipped with heavy artillery but we are waiting for orders from the interior minister."
Link


Afghanistan
Don't Call Us Occupiers When We're Dying for Your Country, U.S. Tells Karzai
2011-06-21
A different source than the one NYer4WOT found for us yesterday. Worth repeating.
The outgoing U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan warned Sunday that the American people are growing weary of being viewed as "occupiers" by the leaders of a country where so much American blood has been spilled.
It would have been better if Bambi had said all this at a White House presser...
Let's not ask for the impossible.
Karl Eikenberry's candid and impassioned remarks came a day after President Hamid Karzai in a televised speech accused U.S.-led foreign troops of being in the country "for their own national interests."

On Sunday, Karzai met with Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi -- on the first ever official visit by Iran's top defense official -- and the two discussed problems arising from "the presence of foreign forces" in Afghanistan, according to reports in Iranian state media. Last week Karzai held talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the sidelines of a Eurasian summit in Kazakhstan, and similar sentiments were expressed.

More than 1,500 U.S. troops have lost their lives in Afghanistan -- some 177 this year alone -- since U.S.-led forces invaded to topple the Taliban regime following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. More than 900 military personnel from other nations have been killed over that period.

There are around 100,000 American troops deployed in Afghanistan, and the first in a series of phased withdrawals is due to take place in the coming weeks.

Without mentioning Karzai by name, Eikenberry took aim Sunday at the increasingly harsh anti-coalition rhetoric emanating from the president, calling it "hurtful and inappropriate." The ambassador, who will leave his post over the summer, made the remarks at the end of a speech on the future of U.S.-Afghan relations, delivered to several hundred students at Herat University.

"When Americans, who are serving in your country at great cost in terms of lives and treasure, when they hear themselves compared with occupiers, told that they're only here to advance their own interest, and likened to the brutal enemies of the Afghan people, my people in turn are filled with confusion and they grow weary of our effort here," Eikenberry said.

"Mothers and fathers of fallen soldiers, spouses of soldiers who have lost arms and legs, children of those who've lost their lives in this country -- they ask themselves about the meaning of their loved one's sacrifice," he continued. "I have to tell you, when I hear some of your leaders call us occupiers, I cannot look at these mourning parents, these mourning spouses, these mourning children, and give them any kind of comforting reply."

Eikenberry conceded that that the "learning curve has been steep" in what is a "complex" situation. "But -- in spite of our mistakes -- we are a good people whose aim is to help improve our mutual security by strengthening your government, army and police, and economy."

He went on to list some of the accomplishments, including the building of schools, clinics, roads, power stations, investment in educational training and in the agricultural field, promoting trade and reviving culture, music and sport.

"Yet, when we hear ourselves being called occupiers and worse, our pride is offended and we begin to lose our inspiration to carry on," he told the Herat University students. "At the point your leaders believe that we are doing more harm than good, when we reach a point that we feel our soldiers and civilians are being asked to sacrifice without a just cause, and our generous aid programs dismissed as totally ineffective and the source of all corruption ... especially at a time our economy is suffering and our needs are not being met, the American people will ask for our forces to come home."
Link


Afghanistan
Ambassador Karl Eikenberry tells it like it is
2011-06-20
The U.S. ambassador to Kabul has issued a thinly veiled warning to Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
... A former Baltimore restaurateur, now 12th and current President of Afghanistan, displacing the legitimate president Rabbani in December 2004. He was installed as the dominant political figure after the removal of the Taliban regime in late 2001 in a vain attempt to put a Pashtun face on the successor state to the Taliban. After the 2004 presidential election, he was declared president regardless of what the actual vote count was. He won a second, even more dubious, five-year-term after the 2009 presidential election. His grip on reality has been slipping steadily since around 2007, probably from heavy drug use...
that harsh criticisms of the West could jeopardize the troops and funding critical to the Afghan government's survival.

Ambassador Karl Eikenberry
...retired United States Army Lieutenant General currently serving as U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan...
said he found comments from "some" Afghan leaders "hurtful and inappropriate," according to a transcript of a speech released late on Sunday.

Although he did not mention Karzai by name, the speech appeared to be a direct response to a string of verbal broadsides against Western troops serving in Afghanistan and the diplomatic and aid programs that accompany them.

In one recent fiery speech Karzai warned that foreign soldiers risked being seen as occupiers because of civilian casualties they caused. Last week he said the West was polluting the country with weapons containing toxic chemicals.

Eikenberry said those comments left him ashamed and speechless in front of the relatives of U.S. war dead.

"When I hear some of your leaders call us occupiers, I cannot look at these mourning parents, spouses, and children in the eye and give them a comforting reply," Eikenberry told an audience of students and academics at Herat University in western Afghanistan.

"When we hear ourselves being called occupiers and worse, our pride is offended and we begin to lose our inspiration to carry on," he added, in a personal addendum to a speech on education and transition.

CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM?

But Karzai's front man said some of the president's comments had been misunderstood and warned against "over-reacting" to constructive criticism, saying that Afghan people standing up for their own interests should not be dubbed offensive.

Karzai's front man said that in his controversial speech on civilian casualties the president was only warning western allies that their image in his country was at risk, and that details may have been lost in a bad translation.

"The president has never termed international forces as occupying forces ... He has said if the bombardment of civilian homes and civilians continue, there is a risk that (this view of western troops as occupiers) could become part of public opinion in Afghanistan," Waheed Omer said.

But Omer also warned against "over-reacting" to criticism, and added that although effective assistance was appreciated, the west had not come to Afghanistan for altruistic reasons.

"No one can deny that international community came to Afghanistan for the sake of their own interests in the first place. We as Afghans have every right ... to make sure that international community's presence also serves the interests of the people of Afghanistan," Omer said.

"I don't see why this should be termed as offending."

DRAWDOWN LOOMS

Eikenberry was speaking as U.S. President Barack B.O. Obama mulls how steep a U.S. troop withdrawal that starts in July should be.

That will coincide with the first phase of a gradual handover of security control to the Afghan police and army, who are due to take responsibility for all of Afghanistan by the end of 2014, though critics warn this date is premature.

At present NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
is rushing to expand and train up security forces that have long struggled with problems ranging from widespread illiteracy, drug abuse and corruption to a dearth of leaders and equipment and a damaging rate of attrition.

Although the training team say progress is impressive, it will still be years before they have a real hope of holding off disciplined and battle-hardened bully boyz across the country.

Even when they can fight alone, the size of the security forces and Afghanistan's sickly economy means they will need help paying salaries and buying equipment for years to come.

Eikenberry warned that patience to help Afghanistan seek security would not be infinite if Afghan partners were dismissive of U.S. sacrifices of lives and money.

"At the point your leaders believe that we are doing more harm than good ... especially at a time our economy is suffering and our needs are not being met, the American people will ask for our forces to come home," Eikenberry said.
Link


India-Pakistan
ISI has Urged Mullah Omar to Leave Pakistan
2011-05-18
[Tolo News] An Afghan security official on Tuesday told TOLOnews that Pakistain's spy organisation has asked Mullah Mohammad Omar to leave Pakistain for a period.

The Afghan security official who spoke on the condition of anonymity told TOLOnews that ISI has conveyed its message to the Taliban leader in Quetta through former Pak spy chief Gen. Hamid Gul.
The nutty former head of Pakistain's ISI, now Godfather to Mullah Omar's Talibs and good buddy and consultant to al-Qaeda's high command...

Mullah Omar has been asked to leave Quetta for some time and move to Afghanistan or Iran.

"The Taliban leader, in the message, has been promised that ISI will facilitate his move to Helmand in Afghanistan or somehere in Iran," the official said.

The source said Pakistain's spy organisation wants to move Mullah Omar out and then report his location to the US forces.

Then if the Taliban leader is killed on Afghan soil, Pakistain will use it as a propaganda tool to show that terrorist leaders are also hiding in Afghanistan, the source said.

Meanwhile,
...back at the secret hideout, Scarface Al sneeringly put his proposition to little Nell...
Commander of Isaf Joint Command Lt Gen. David Rodriguez said on Monday that there were still around 100 al-Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan.

"We still think that there are just less than a 100 al-Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan, but again what they do is a cadre type organisation that helps out to bring both resources as well as technical skills to the rest of the Taliban fighting here," Gen. Rodriguez said at a presser in Kabul.

US ambassador in Kabul, Karl Eikenberry, had previously said senior bully boy leaders were outside Afghanistan.

"The senior leadership of the organisations ... al-Qaeda, Taliban, Haqqani, they do not live in your country," he said. "They have sanctuary outside of Afghanistan and now that we assume that their significant leaders that are found that are in Pakistain," Mr Eikenberry had said in Kabul on May 5.

He had said the United States was determined to kill or detain anyone that threatened the US national security anywhere in the world.

Afghan political expert, Noor-ul-Haq Olumi, believes that al-Qaeda structure has not been damaged and it is still functiong even after its leader has been killed.

"ISI is the organisation that trains, funds and harbours such terrorist organisation, and I think the region will suffer until no action is taken against the real terrorist training centre in the region," Mr Olumi said.

NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
has said the late Osama bin Laden's
... who abandoned all hope when he entered there...
death will not affect the Afghan mission and that they would stay in Afghanistan until necessary.

It comes as the United States has reportedly decided to speed up direct talks with the Taliban.

A US representative has attended at least three meetings in Qatar and Germany and the most recent has taken place around nine months ago, the Washington Post reports.

State Department front man Michael A. Hammer has said on Monday that the US has been having a "broad range of contacts across Afghanistan and the region, at many levels.

The talks with the Taliban have proceeded on several tracks, including through non-governmental intermediaries and Arab and European governments, US officials have said.

The Taliban have always rebuffed Afghan government calls for peace talks and pre-conditioned withdrawal of all foreign forces from the country before any talks can be held.

There have even been reports in the past that the Taliban group was willing to engage in direct talks with the US rather than with the Afghan government.
Link


Afghanistan
Insurgent Attacks in Afghanistan Plotted in Pakistan: John F. Kerry
2011-05-15
[Tolo News] Insurgent attacks in Afghanistan are carried out by hard boyz trained in Pakistain, Senator John I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry
Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, the Senate's current foreign policy expert, filling the vacated wingtips of Joe Biden...
said on Saturday while meeting with officials in the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif.

Senator John Kerry, Chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on Saturday landed in Afghanistan's northern Balkh province.

During his visit in Mazar-e-Sharif, Mr Kerry met with senior provincial officials including Balkh governor Atta Mohammad Noor.

Mr Kerry was accompanied by US Ambassador in Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry.

During the meeting with Balkh officials, Mr John Kerry said Pakistain should act honestly in the fight against terrorism.

"It is really critical that we talk with the Paks, as friends, in the best effort to try to achieve the most cooperation possible to make all of us safer. We believe that Pakistain itself is challenged from these Death Eaters, snuffies and terrorists," Mr John Kerry told news hounds.

Senator John Kerry was expected to visit Pakistain first and then fly to Afghanistan, but a recent twist in Pakistain-US relations after the death of the late Osama bin Laden
... who abandoned all hope when he entered there...
could be the only reason for a change in his travel plan.

Recently, while chairing the third in a series of hearings on Afghanistan and Pakistain, Mr Kerry said now we are focusing on the path the B.O. regime needs to take in order to hand over security responsibility to Afghan cops by 2014.

"Osama bin Laden's death was more than a critical triumph in our fight against terrorism. It provides a potentially game-changing opportunity to build momentum for a political solution in Afghanistan that could bring greater stability to the region and bring our troops home," he had said during the hearing on Afghanistan and Pakistain.

The killing of Bin Laden in Abbottabad near Islamabad raised a lot of tough questions against Pakistain.

It was widely expected that Pakistain should explain why the al-Qaeda leader could live undetected in the garrison town of Abbottabad near Islamabad for nearly a decade.

Both the Afghanistan's Caped President and experts here believed killing of Bin Laden on Pak territory was a concrete evidence to prove terrorist sanctuaries existed in Pakistain.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More