India-Pakistan |
SC dismisses review appeal against acquittal of accused in Mukhtaran Mai gang-rape case |
2019-06-16 |
![]() A three-member bench headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed announced the decision. The court also stated that the points raised in the petition may be looked at in another case. Justice Ahmed advised that the petition should be shortened and said: "Shorten the review petition or it will drag on for 10 years." Mai’s lawyer, Aitizaz Ahsan, informed the court that the Lahore High Court (LHC) in its 2005 verdict had stated that no injuries resulting from a sexual assault were visible even though witness statements said otherwise. In June 2002, Mai was gang-raped on orders of a ’panchayat’ as punishment after her younger brother was accused of illicit relations with a girl from a rival tribe. In August 2002, an anti-terrorism court awarded death penalty ![]() In March 2005, five convicts were acquitted by a Lahore High Court bench while one’s sentence was converted into life imprisonment. The acquittal was challenged in the apex court. A three-judge bench headed by Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan and comprising former CJPs Nasirul Mulk and Mian Saqib Nisar upheld LHC decision and rejected the appeal in its April 2011 verdict. Mai filed a review petition against the judgment in May 2011. In her review petition, Mai has pleaded that the court should review and recall the judgment and grant relief as prayed in the appeal. She had also requested the court to constitute a larger bench to hear her petition, contending that she is aggrieved of and dissatisfied with the findings of the court. |
Link |
India-Pakistan | |
Military courts cannot try civilians except charges of sedition: SC | |
2009-05-15 | |
ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the Court Martial could try civilians only if they are guilty of or attempt to commit sedition and mutiny.
The appellants had signed a contract with the Pakistan Air Force officials for the carriage of jet petroleum (JP-4) from Karachi to various PAF bases. With the passage of time, it was found that the seals of the tankers were broken and the fuel was sold with the connivance of some PAF officers. The PAF officers were also tried for the theft under Section 52 of the PAF Act 1953, while the appellants were tried under Section 37 (e) of the Act for endeavouring to seduce the officers of the PAF from their duty. On September 30, 2002, Saleem was sentenced to 25 years of rigorous imprisonment, subsequently reduced to 20 years. Abbas was sentenced to 23 years of rigorous imprisonment on February 8, 2003. The SC bench consisting of Justice Sardar Raza Khan, Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan and Justice Nasirul Mulk set aside the sentence against the appellants, holding that the sentence was awarded coram non judice and a nullity. | |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Supreme Court orders school on Jamia Hafsa site |
2007-08-29 |
![]() A four-member bench of the SC comprising Justice Javed Iqbal, Justice Fakir Muhammad Khokhar, Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan and Justice M Javed Buttar heard the suo motu case of the Lal Masjid and Jamia Hafsa operation. Interior Secretary Syed Kamal, Islamabad Deputy Commissioner Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, and the Interior Ministrys National Crisis Management Cell Director General Brigadier (r) Javed Iqbal Cheema appeared in court. Why did the Capital Development Authority (CDA) turn a blind eye [to the madrassa] despite having a huge army of employees? asked Justice Javed Iqbal in response to the arguments of respondents, who contended that a sizable portion of the madrassa was built on encroached state land. The court told the authorities to address the grievances of the families of those killed in the operation. The Interior Ministry was also directed to speed up the process of DNA testing to identify the dead. Kamal told the court that all those arrested during the Lal Masjid operation had been released except for head cleric Maulana Abdul Aziz and his daughter Tayyaba Dua. He also told the court that Dua would be released as well. He said 42 bodies had so far been identified by DNA testing and 20 remained. |
Link |
India-Pakistan | |
SC dismisses former ISI chief's petition | |
2007-03-06 | |
![]() The petition, filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, also asked the court to order the government to give compensation to the family of the Pakistani soldier killed in the incident, and to halt military operations against the people of the tribal areas. However, a five-member bench comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday, Justice Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi and Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan, unanimously dismissed the petition on the grounds that the tribal areas do not come under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The bench also objected that Gen Gul had no locus standi to file the petition, as he is not a resident of the tribal areas. Advocate Muhammad Ikram Chaudhry, Gen Guls lawyer, told reporters after the hearing that former MNA from FATA Haroon Rashid would now move a similar petition on behalf of the people of the tribal areas. The counsel in his preliminary arguments submitted that the people of FATA were citizens of Pakistan and it was the governments responsibility to protect their lives and property.
| |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Petition against Qazi dismissed |
2007-01-13 |
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition against Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal President Qazi Hussain Ahmed. The petition accused Qazi of selling party tickets for the last Senate election and approving disproportional nominations, leaving room for horse-trading in the NWFP Assembly. A three-member bench of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan and Justice Saiyed Saeed Ashhad rejected the arguments of the petitioner, Shahid Orakzai, and dismissed the case. |
Link |
India-Pakistan | |||
Pak SC seeks legal avenues to ban blasphemous cartoons worldwide | |||
2006-03-14 | |||
![]()
| |||
Link |
India-Pakistan | |||
Top Pak Court Orders Blocking of Blasphemous Websites | |||
2006-03-04 | |||
![]()
| |||
Link |
India-Pakistan |
SC directs IGs to stop marriages for compensation |
2006-02-25 |
![]() The court was moved to abolish the social customs of Vani and Swara (a mode of dispute settlement in which young girls of the offenders family are wedded to the men of the victim family as compensation). The court also heard the cases of five girls from Mianwali who have appealed to President Pervez Musharraf and the chief justice to save them from Vani, and a petition by freelance anthropologist Samar Minallah against the notorious customs. Five girls Asiya, 8, Amina, 9, her sisters Abida, 7, Sajida, 5, and Fatima, 7 were given in verbal Nikah in compensation of a murder to save their elders. Amina, Sajida and Abida have reportedly threatened to commit suicide if not protected from the custom. |
Link |