Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Home Front: WoT
US charges Foopie with Africa bombings
2008-04-01
The Pentagon announced Monday war crimes charges carrying the death penalty against a Tanzanian inmate held in Guantanamo Bay arising from Al-Qaeda attacks on US embassies in East Africa a decade ago.

The Defense Department said Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani would face a special military tribunal on nine counts including murder related to the August 1998 bombing of the embassy in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, which killed 11 people and injured hundreds. Military prosecutors said that after the twin bombings in Tanzania and Kenya, which altogether killed more than 200, Ghailani worked as a bodyguard for Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, and forged documents and trained recruits. "Six of the nine charges carry the maximum penalty of death," Brigadier General Thomas Hartman, legal adviser to the Office of Military Commissions at Guantanamo Bay, told reporters.

Hartman said the military commission trials gave full protection to defendants, including the right to view evidence, to call witnesses and to pursue appeals against any conviction all the way up to the US Supreme Court. The legal rights "are specifically designed to ensure that every accused receives a fair trial consistent with American standards of justice," he said, adding that a unanimous jury of 12 is needed to deliver the death penalty.

But the Pentagon's announcement sparked an predictable outcry from rights campaigners, who insisted the legal front of the US "war on terror" enacted at the naval base on Cuba was a travesty of justice. "These commissions aren't fit to try anybody, still less to condemn anybody to death," Amnesty International USA lawyer Jumana Musa told AFP, noting that Ghailani still faced a federal court indictment issued in 1998.

In October 2001, just after the devastating attacks on New York and Washington, four Al-Qaeda extremists were sentenced to life without parole by the Manhattan court for their part in the African embassy bombings. "There's absolutely no reason why Ghailani's trial shouldn't proceed there instead of in a military commission," Jennifer Daskal of Human Rights Watch said. "It's a particular concern that he could be sentenced to death under a system that allows, in certain circumstances, the use of evidence obtained through highly abusive interrogations, and lacks established rules and procedures," she said.

Ghailani was arrested in Pakistan in July 2004 after a shootout with police, and transferred to US custody about five months later. He had been on the FBI's most-wanted list and had a five million dollar bounty on his head. When he was arrested, Ghailani was drawing up plans for a missile strike on an airliner at Nairobi airport in Kenya as well for attacks on London's Heathrow Airport and US financial institutions, Pakistani officials said.

Ghailani's capture was hailed as the biggest coup in the hunt for Al-Qaeda since Pakistan arrested Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in March 2003. Mohammed, the self-confessed mastermind of the September 11 attacks of 2001, was slapped with capital charges in February along with five other Guantanamo detainees. The CIA has acknowledged that waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning widely denounced as torture, was used nearly five years ago in interrogations of Mohammed. Military prosecutors accused Ghailani of playing an instrumental role in the Dar es Salaam bombing, including buying explosives and detonators, and moving the bomb components to various safe houses around Tanzania's biggest city. They alleged that he scouted the US embassy with the suicide bomb driver, met with conspirators in Nairobi shortly before the bombing, and joined them on a flight to Pakistan a day prior to the attack.

A total of 15 Guantanamo detainees have now been charged under the Military Commissions Act, which was hurriedly passed by Congress in 2006 to answer Supreme Court objections to the previous system of military justice created to try "war on terror" suspects. Only one case has been concluded through the controversial Guantanamo trial system. "Aussie Taliban" David Hicks reached a plea deal with prosecutors and completed his sentence on home soil when he returned to Australia in May.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Judge Postpones Canadian's Gitmo Hearing
2007-11-09
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba (AP) - A U.S. government official's eyewitness account of a firefight that killed a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan could derail the Bush administration's plans to put a former child soldier on military trial, defense attorneys said Thursday. The witness described a 2002 firefight in Afghanistan in which Khadr, then 15, allegedly threw a grenade that killed Sgt. 1st Class Christopher Speer, a Delta Force commando, at an al-Qaida compound, the defense attorneys said.

Omar Khadr's lead attorney, Navy Lt. Cmdr. William Kuebler, said the evidence could prove the Guantanamo detainee does not merit a designation as an "unlawful enemy combatant," which is required for him to face trial on this U.S. Navy base.

The evidence was revealed by U.S. military prosecutors to defense attorneys on Tuesday - five years after the Canadian teenager was detained. The attorneys couldn't discuss the classified evidence or identify the witness, but Kuebler was clearly angry over the limited disclosure to defense attorneys. "How much other exculpatory evidence is out there behind the black curtain that we can't see?" Kuebler told reporters.
We don't know enough to know what the firefight was about, or why Khadr would be legal or illegal on that basis. What we do know is that even Carla del Ponte could run this farce at a faster pace.
The presiding judge, Army Col. Peter Brownback, postponed a decision Thursday on whether Khadr can be tried by the military as an "unlawful enemy combatant."

Khadr, the Toronto-born son of an alleged al-Qaida financier, answered the judge's questions politely, saying "Yes, sir" and "Yeah," and did not enter a plea to charges including murder, conspiracy and spying. He appeared for the hearing with a short beard and the white prison uniform reserved for the most compliant detainees.
May well be that the smart thing to do is to repatriate him to Afghanistan and let Kharzi deal with him. Toss Khadr into an Afghan prison for a couple of years and he'll beg to go back to Gitmo.
Kuebler said the prosecutors were legally obligated to share the new evidence and criticized the government for not making the information available sooner as defense attorneys prepare for the first U.S. war-crime trials since the World War II era. Kuebler also complained that defense lawyers have been barred from interviewing an FBI agent who deposed Khadr and a U.S. Army officer who led the raid on the alleged al-Qaida compound, even though both are at Guantanamo.
Because these aren't supposed to be trials, they're supposed to be status tribunals. Is he a legal or illegal combatant? You should be able to answer that in an hour or so. This farce raises the spectre of our combat forces saying, in the field, "screw this" and just popping a prisoner. That isn't right, and we don't want that to happen. But our people in the field have to know that illegal combatants will be dealt with both harshly and quickly.
The lead prosecutor, Marine Corps. Maj. Jeffrey Groharing pleaded for an opportunity to present evidence against Khadr. He said the government had flown in witnesses and has a videotape that shows Khadr planting land mines. But Brownback stood by his postponement, and set deadlines of Dec. 7 and Jan. 11 for attorneys to file motions. No trial date was set.

Only unlawful enemy combatants can be tried by the military commissions, according to the Military Commissions Act, approved by Congress and signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush last year. The law sought to legitimize war-crime tribunals that had been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

Brownback dismissed the charges against Khadr in June because he had not been classified as an "unlawful" enemy combatant. A hastily created military appeals court then ruled that Brownback had authority to attach that label himself. But the judge said Thursday that there was no need to immediately address Khadr's status because defense lawyers have not formally requested clarification. Brownback also dismissed Kuebler's request that he remove himself for lack of impartiality.

The defense team, meanwhile, has challenged the appeals court ruling and said they were not conceding that the military court has jurisdiction.

The judge declined to answer questions about whether the tribunal system is constitutional, but acknowledged criticism from the Pentagon for dismissing Khadr's charges in June. "The DoD (Department of Defense) people, they didn't like what I wrote," said Brownback.

Critics said Thursday's events reflect flaws in a system that has yet to produce a trial. "It does question the wisdom of bringing everyone down here for a proceeding with a status and procedure that is still unknown and unknowable," said Jumana Musa, advocacy director of Amnesty International.

Khadr is one of three Guantanamo detainees facing charges under the Military Commissions Act. The military plans to prosecute as many as 80 of the 320 men at Guantanamo. But the Supreme Court may have other ideas. A challenge to the reconstituted system is pending and detainee lawyers have asked the justices to guarantee they can challenge their confinement in U.S. civilian courts.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Specter to Hold Hearings on 'Gulag'
2005-06-05
Prompted by Amnesty International's complaint that the U.S. terrorist detention facility at Guantanamo Bay is a "gulag," Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter plans to hold hearings this month to clarify the rights of terrorist suspects. Specter's investigation will focus on the detention of enemy combatants at both Guantanamo and inside the United States, according to the Associated Press. One of the key questions on the Pennsylvania Republican's agenda: whether trying accused terrorists before military tribunals provides them adequate due process.
Are they being provided with fluffy pillows?
Critics of U.S. policy have also complained that techniques such as waterboarding, which was used at Guantanamo against Osama bin Laden's top lieutenant Khalid Sheik Mohammed, constitutes torture.
Bedtime mint?
Mohammed was al Qaeda's operations chief for the 9/11 attacks.
Which means they could have slowly ground him into hamburger and I wouldn't have cared a bit...
Because of the alleged mistreatment of detainees like Mohammed, Amnesty International's 2005 human rights report labels Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld "architects of torture."
It is kind of a classic of hyperbole, isn't it?
Specter has begun drafting a bill to establish procedures for accused terrorists, which could include the creation of a process where detainees could contest their incarcerations, the AP said. Amnesty International applauded the Pennsylvania Republican for his decision to hold gulag hearings. "Any kind of sunshine would be a good antiseptic for this situation," the group's advocacy director, Jumana Musa, told the AP.
Spectar once again proves his RINO credentials.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-3 More