Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The story behind Israel's secret strike on Syria's nuclear reactor
2018-03-23
[Al Monitor] Sometime in late 2006, US Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte visited Israel. According to a security source speaking on condition of anonymity, at a meeting with the heads of Israeli intelligence at Mossad headquarters in Tel Aviv, intelligence branch officers presented a small time bomb. On the margins of the discussion, dealing with various security analyses of Israel’s neighbors, Col. Eli Ben-Meir, head of the technological branch of army intelligence, said that according to his assessments the Syrians were working on an "unconventional weapons project."

Amnon Sofrin, head of Mossad's intelligence branch, fumed. He had not authorized army intelligence officials to bring up the topic, because Mossad had concluded that there was no nuclear activity in Syria. Regardless, Ben-Meir had opened his presentation to Negroponte with three slides on nuclear activity in Syria. His assertions were explosive and controversial. Not only Mossad, but the Americans as well, headed by Negroponte, rejected the army intelligence assessment as unrealistic.

Ben-Meir had illustrated his presentation with dark clouds and called the situation "a nuclear cloud." Negroponte expressed his disagreement with him: I’m an expert on everything involving North Korea, he said, and it can’t be that the North Koreans are creating a nuclear reactor in Syria under our radar. That’s not possible.

At that stage, Ben-Meir was viewed as foolish, as hallucinating. Hard and unequivocal evidence for his extraordinary assertion that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was secretly building a plutogenic nuclear reactor in the heart of the Syrian Desert was yet to be found. Ben-Meir knew that he was right, but he was unable to prove it. He also knew that North Korea was behind the secret project, which threatened to change the face of the Middle East within a year.

Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistani PM vows to punish anyone proved to blame for Mumbai attacks
2009-01-06
Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said Monday his government remained committed to punishing Pakistani nationals accused of taking part in the Mumbai attacks if "credible" evidence is given against them. Gilani made the comments during talks with Richard Boucher, the US assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asia, who arrived in Islamabad early Monday in a bid to defuse simmering tensions between Pakistan and India.

Gilani spoke of "Pakistan's persistent efforts to defuse the current tensions with India, and his government's commitment to take action against any Pakistani national in case credible evidence is provided," his office said.

Earlier Monday, Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee said that New Delhi had handed over to Islamabad what it said was evidence linking the Islamic militants who carried out the late November attacks to "elements in Pakistan."

Pakistan said it had received the dossier and was reviewing it. New Delhi has blamed the attacks - which left 172 people dead, including nine of the gunmen - on the banned Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, which is fighting Indian rule in divided Kashmir.

Islamabad had repeatedly said that India had not provided any evidence linking the Mumbai attackers with Pakistan.

Mukherjee said the Indian dossier included details of the interrogation of Mohammad Ajmal Amir Iman - also known as Mohammad Ajmal Kasab - who is the lone surviving gunman and whom India says is a Pakistani national.

It also details the militants' communications with "elements" in Pakistan during the attack, recovered weapons and other equipment, retrieved global positioning system data and satellite phones.

A number of US officials have visited both Pakistan and India, including US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and her deputy John Negroponte, following the attacks in a bid to defuse tensions between the nuclear-armed rivals.

Boucher, who arrived in Pakistan early Monday, also met with Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and President Asif Ali Zardari, who gave him an award for his "service to Pakistan." Zardari said Boucher had been "instrumental in promoting a stable, broad-based and long-term Pakistan-US relationship," the Associated Press of Pakistan news agency reported.
Link


Iraq
US Opens Its News Embassy In Baghdad
2009-01-05
Faltering slightly at first, a lone voice sang The Star-Spangled Banner as a large American flag was hoisted to mark the opening of the new US Embassy inside Baghdad's green zone today.

Ryan Crocker, the US Ambassador to Iraq, told a ceremony in the grounds of the sprawling compound, the biggest American embassy in the world, that this was the start of a new era in relations between the two countries. The move followed the similarly symbolic handover on New Year's Day of Saddam Hussein's old presidential palace, which had served as the US Embassy since the invasion, to the Iraqi Government.

"Today is about more than raising a flag and dedicating an embassy. It is about new directions and a new future," Mr Crocker told an audience of diplomats, officials and military personnel.

As he spoke, the sound of helicopters buzzed overhead, a reminder of the ongoing US military presence in Iraq despite the shift in power. All US forces in the country came under the authority of the Iraqi Government on January 1 after a UN Security Council resolution authorising their presence expired.

Under a new agreement between Baghdad and Washington, US troops will pull out of towns and cities by mid-2009 and out of the country within three years.

Raffie al-Issawi, one of Iraq's two Deputy Prime Ministers, said that the establishment of a fully-fledged American embassy in a sovereign Iraq "means really a new era of excellent relations".

Speaking to The Times after the ceremony, he added: "I feel that now everything is done an Iraqi way with the assistance of the Americans and others. I hope that it will be a prosperous and excellent future for my country and my people."

The upbeat statements contrast with the violent reality on the ground. Attacks are down significantly from a year ago, but bombings still occur on a near-daily basis.
You didn't expect a Times reporter to be upbeat, did you ...
Four people were killed today and another 19 were injured in four bombs across Baghdad. The attacks came 24 hours after at least 35 people died and scores more were wounded when a female suicide bomber targeted Shia pilgrims at a revered shrine in the northeast of the capital.

Security at the Embassy was typically tight for the ceremony. Also speaking was John Negroponte, Deputy Secretary of State, on a visit from Washington. He served as the first US ambassador to Iraq after the 2003 invasion.

In addition Jalal Talabani, Iraq's Kurdish President, said a few words to the several hundred assembled guests, who included Christopher Prentice, the British Ambassador to Iraq and Lieutenant-General John Cooper, the most senior British military commander in the country. After the speeches, people filed under a large, white marquee for a finger buffet and coffee.

Spread across 104 acres, the embassy compound of orange-y buildings cost more than $700 million to build. Surrounded by high walls of reinforced concrete, some people joke that it looks more like a prison from the outside.
Link


Iraq
Iran: Iraqis entitled to decide their fate
2008-10-20
The Head of Iran's Expediency Council, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, says the Iraqi people are seeking the right to determine their own fate.
He says the words but he means something different ...
In a Sunday meeting with Iraq's former prime minister Ebrahim Jafari, Ayatollah Rafsanjani urged Iraq's political and religious figures to safeguard the country's independence and security. "There is no doubt that Washington's claims of 'war on terror' and 'democracy in Iraq' were threadbare excuses to invade the country. Such claims are proven to be all but lies and fallacy," said Rafsanjani.

Jafari, for his part, asserted that the Iraqi people are fully capable of deciding the future of their country and stressed that a US-proposed security fact, namely Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), would be detrimental to the Iraqi nation.

Washington has pushed hard for an Iraq-US security pact, which would provide it with a legal basis for the presence of US troops in Iraq after their mandate under the United Nations expires later this year. The deal has faced severe criticism from prominent Iraqi political and religious figures, who say it would undermine the country's national sovereignty.

Nearly a million Iraqis staged massive rallies in Baghdad on Saturday to protest the controversial deal.

The latest draft of a security deal currently under negotiation between the US and Baghdad still envisages immunity from legal prosecution for US nationals inside Iraq.

In an exclusive interview with Press TV in October, Iraqi lawmaker Mohammed Kamid al-Humedawi said the United States is using the country's debts as leverage to force Baghdad into signing the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). "Baghdad is under pressure by Washington to accept the security deal in exchange for clearing all of Iraq's debts," said al-Humedawi.

This is while the Iraqi web site al-Morsad reported on Oct. 10 that US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte had threatened to oust the Iraqi Premier Nouri al-Maliki unless he signed the controversial deal.
Link


Iraq
Iraq pronounces itself ready to take over security in Baghdad
2008-10-09
Iraq's government said on Wednesday it was ready to take over security responsibilities from US security forces in Baghdad as both countries say they are nearing a deal on a contested military pact. Interior Ministry spokesman Major General Abdel-Karim Khalaf said Iraqi police are capable of handling security duties across the capital, a responsibility now held by US troops. "We have the ability to take over the internal security responsibility in Baghdad if American forces pull out of the city," he said in a statement. "The Interior Ministry is able to take responsibility for protecting Baghdad."

His remarks came a day after Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Washington and Baghdad are now "very close" to an agreement on the presence of American troops in the country beyond this year. Zebari was speaking at a news conference with visiting US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte shortly after two bombs went off just outside the capital's heavily fortified Green Zone, leaving at least seven people, including an Iraqi soldier, wounded.

At a news conference in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad commander General Jeffery Hammond, who commands 28,700 US-led foreign troops, said the improvement in security in the city of 6 million was dramatic but dangers remained. "Security has improved, let there be no doubt," said Hammond, noting that Baghdad is now averaging four attacks a day, which according to US statistics was 89 percent less than in 2006 and 83 percent lower than in 2007.
Khalaf said Iraqi security services lacked explosive detectors to prevent car bombs but otherwise had been effective in reducing the overall level of violence in the country, which is said to be at a four-year low.
"We have been successful in creating the conditions for sustainable security for the eventual transfer to Iraq security forces but let there be no doubt that challenges remain."

The Interior Ministry said there had been an increase in the number of car bombs and roadside blasts in Baghdad since the start of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan but said this did not mean a breakdown of security. "An increase in car bomb attacks and IED [improvised explosive device] attacks, particularly since Ramadan [last month] does not mean that security forces failed," the statement said.

Khalaf said Iraqi security services lacked explosive detectors to prevent car bombs but otherwise had been effective in reducing the overall level of violence in the country, which is said to be at a four-year low. The ministry "is seeking [financial help from] some provincial councils to import such devices and technologies to cover all areas of Baghdad and other provinces," he said.

The US military has handed over security responsibility in 11 of the 18 provinces in Iraq since June 2006. The process started with the Shiite southern province of Muthanna, which borders Saudi Arabia.
Link


Iraq
Iraq ready to replace US troops in Baghdad
2008-10-08
IRAQ said today it was ready to take over security responsibilities from US security forces in Baghdad as both countries say they are nearing a deal on a contested military pact.

Interior ministry spokesman Major General Abdel Karim Khalaf said Iraqi police are capable of handling security duties across the capital, a responsibility now held by US troops. "We have the ability to take over the internal security responsibility in Baghdad if American forces pull out of the city," he said. "The interior ministry is able to take responsibility for protecting Baghdad."
You're welcome to do so whenever you're ready ...
His remarks came a day after Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Washington and Baghdad are now "very close" to an agreement on the presence of American troops in the country beyond this year. "There have been new ideas and new language that could be acceptable, but no final decision has been made. This needs some bold political decisions now," Mr Zebari said on Tuesday.

Mr Zebari was speaking at a press conference with visiting US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte shortly after two bombs went off just outside the Green Zone, leaving at least seven people, including an Iraqi soldier, injured.

In Baghdad commander General Jeffery Hammond, who leads 28,700 US-led foreign troops said the improvement in security in the city of six million was dramatic but dangers remained. "Security has improved, let there be no doubt," said Gen Hammond, noting that Baghdad is now averaging four attacks a day, which according to US statistics was 89 per cent less than in 2006 and 83 per cent lower than in 2007. "We have been successful in creating the conditions for sustainable security for the eventual transfer to Iraq security forces but let there be no doubt that challenges remain."

The interior ministry said there had been an increase in the number of car bombs and roadside blasts in Baghdad since the start of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan but said this did not mean a breakdown of security. "An increase in car bomb attacks and IED (improvised explosive device) attacks, particularly since Ramadan (last month) does not mean that security forces failed."

Mr Khalaf said Iraqi security services lacked explosive detectors to prevent car bombs but otherwise had been effective in reducing the overall level of violence in the country, which is said to be at a four-year low. The ministry "is seeking (financial help from) some provincial councils to import such devices and technologies to cover all areas of Baghdad and other provinces", he said.

The US military has handed over security responsibility in 11 of the 18 provinces in Iraq since June 2006. The process started with the Shiite southern province of Muthanna, which borders Saudi Arabia.

Much of Iraq's improved security has been credited to the recruitment of Sunni tribesmen and former rebels by the US military to fight against al-Qaeda. Some 54,000 are deployed in Baghdad out of a force of 100,000 across the country.

Gen Hammond highlighted the importance of the Iraqi government ensuring that the Sons of Iraq fighters, as the Americans refer to them, are properly integrated into the mainstream security forces in the city. Only 3400 of the fighters have been integrated into the national police force in Baghdad while another 7000 are currently awaiting approval from the interior ministry, he said.

"The Iraqi government has committed to accepting responsibility for the Sons of Iraq. We are going to be there to assist the transfer. I'm confident this is going to go well," he said. "We will not abandon the Sons of Iraq."
Link


Iraq
Sadrists reject Negroponte's visit to Iraq
2008-10-05
Aswat al-Iraq: A lawmaker from Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militias rejected on Saturday a visit by U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte to Iraq, adding the visit only aims to press Iraqis into signing a security agreement with Washington.

"The U.S. administration, through Negroponte, is trying to add certain items that impinge upon Iraq's sovereignty," Aqeel Abdelhussein told Aswat al-Iraq. "We reject these visits altogether and urge the Iraqi side to maintain the country's sovereignty and also to negotiate the occupation forces' withdrawal from Iraq," he said.

Abdelhussein, whose Sadrist bloc occupies 30 out of a total 275 seats in the Iraqi parliament, said that Iraq would be in no need of such agreement, particularly after the Iraqi army succeeded to fine-tune security conditions. "The agreement would lead Iraq to a dark tunnel," he said, ruling out that this agreement would be signed this year due to many outstanding problems in its items.

The U.S. embassy in Baghdad had announced on Friday evening that Negroponte arrived on an unannounced visit to Iraq for talks with Iraqi officials on political, security and economic progress in Iraq.
Link


India-Pakistan
This is why they hate you
2008-08-17
By Abbas Zaidi

Since 9/11, General Musharraf has systematically destroyed every institution in Pakistan. Thanks to the economic policies of Shaukat Aziz, the Citibank executive that Musharraf imported from New York to run PakistanŽs economy first as finance minister and then prime minister, there has been so much poverty and frustration in the country that few economists are confident that things can improve even marginally in the foreseeable future. Men have been killing their families and then committing suicide because they cannot feed them. Widows and divorcees have been putting up their children for sale, jumping into rivers or in front of trains because they cannot afford a meal.

There is one man that the people of Pakistan (85 percent, according opinion polls) believe is responsible for their plight: General Musharraf. It is, however, not just poverty that Musharraf has wreaked on Pakistani masses. He has given another gift to the country and its people: on 3 November 2007 he sacked and imprisoned 60 judges of the Supreme and High Courts of Pakistan. In the words of Aitzaz Ahsen, President of the Pakistan Supreme Court Bar Association, sacking and imprisoning 60 judges (along with their families) is unprecedented in the legal history of the world. Since 3 November 2007, the lawyers and the people of Pakistan have been campaigning hard to have the judges restored, but Musharraf has shown no respect for the law of the land. People by and large strongly believe that he has had a hand in the assassination of Benazir Bhutto too. This is borne out from the fact that only days before her assassination, Benazir in her e-mail to Mark Siegel wrote that if she was assassinated, Musharraf would be connected to it.

Musharraf is so much hated in Pakistan that no one can praise him in public and not be manhandled. This is why, the Musharraf-backed Muslim League (Q) was thrashed in the national elections held on 18 February. For the success of his party, Musharraf had been campaigning like a man possessed. He declared that peopleŽs vote on 18 February would be a vote for or against him. The result on 18 February brought Pakistan PeopleŽs Party and Muslims League (N) in power, the two parties that Musharraf had demonized for years.

The vote on 18 February gave the people of Pakistan hope. They believed that after years of MusharrafŽs misrule, their own representatives would do something for them—in whatever measure. But they also believed that Musharraf was the hurdle which must be removed before any good could come their way. All and sundry demanded that he resign. But then the government of the United States of America jumped onto the Pakistan stage like a Hollywood macho. From John Negroponte and Mark Boucher down to State DepartmentŽs junior officers plus a pack of high ranking military officers began to "meet" (actually bully, as Pakistanis think) the elected representatives of Pakistan even before they had formed the government. Soon Bush and Rice weighed in and the new government of Pakistan was told that Musharraf would stay at all costs. By the first week of June 2008, there was so much pressure on the parliament that it appeared that Musharraf would be impeached. PakistanŽs leaders and ministers gave clear indications—even a date—to this effect. But then suddenly George Bush phoned Musharraf and assured him of his personal support. Next day Musharraf was howling like a wolf amidst a herd of sheep. He held a press conference and not only bragged about his "constitutional powers" (as if he had ever respected PakistanŽs constitution!), but also he insulted the people of Pakistan in a manner that even the heartless Nero would not have even imagined: To a question that the people of Pakistan could no longer afford to eat even pulses (the cheapest commodity in Pakistan), Musharraf responded with an extremely malicious sneer: "They should eat chicken!"

On 12 June 2008, half a million lawyers and general public gathered in Islamabad after a two-day Long March in order to force the government to restore the judges. From every city, town, and village people walked more than a thousand miles with their little kids shouting "Hang Musharraf!" Thousands of them had brought the dictatorŽs posters which they spat on and beat with shoes: In Pakistan, these are the most hateful expressions one can make. The huge gathering in Islamabad was addressed by a number of lawyers and politicians, and all of them demanded that Musharraf be tried for high treason, a crime whose penalty is death. Musharraf has been a serial committer of this crime. One can imagine the hatred the people of Pakistan have for the United States for unabashedly supporting Musharraf. People are angry that the sole superpower in the world has undermined democracy even before it could start functioning. It is very convenient for the likes of the CNN and Fox to put innocent-looking American kids on TV with "Why do they hate us?" question. American networks, however, have never asked, say, a Pakistani to answer this question. Instead they have George Bush answering the question: "They hate our freedoms!" Pakistanis do not hate the United States. You will find millions of Pakistanis who have their relations living happily in the United States. Pakistanis are very appreciative of American educational institutions: You will find few Pakistanis who do not want their children to study in America. Many Pakistani parents sell their properties to send their children to the United States to study. American scientific and technological advances awe and astound Pakistanis. They have no reason to hate America or the Americans, but they always say: "We have no inclination even to think ill of your freedoms. DonŽt rob us of our own. Period."



Since its establishment in 1947 Pakistan has been a frontline state for the United States. Till the 1980s it played a pivotal role in containing, undermining, and ultimately destroying the Soviet Union. The American-backed Afghanistan jihad against the Soviet Union in the 1980s was launched from Pakistan. And now Pakistan is the "most allied ally" in the American War against Terrorism. As a result, Pakistani society has become the most violent society in the world. Having done so much for the United States, the people of Pakistan deserve support and understanding. The United States can at least rid Pakistan of the Taliban who have turned Pakistan into a sectarian battlefield of great bloodshed. The United States has had an indirect hand in the creation of the Taliban in the first place. Now it can destroy this evil once for all. But it is very clear that the United States is not interested in wiping off the Taliban, but control and use them in places like Iran and South Lebanon. Given the TalibanŽs hatred of Iran (because the Iranians are Shias, and the Taliban Wahabis/Deobandis like the Saudis), and American malevolence towards the Islamic Republic (one of the few democracies in the Islamic world), making of a US-Taliban brotherhood may not be too far.

But sadly, the United States has never done anything that can benefit Pakistan. The billions of dollars of loans (wrongly called "aid") that it has been giving to Pakistan have landed in the generalŽs hands. But it is the people who have been repaying the loans with high interest on them. Instead of helping the people of Pakistan, the United States has strangled PakistanŽs democracy every time it was brought to life by the people of Pakistan. Dictators like Generals Ayub (in the 1950s and the 1960s), Yahya (in the late 1960s), Zia (1980s), and Musharraf (since 2001) were (and are) whole-heartedly backed by the United States despite the fact that their crimes against humanity were blatant, glaring, and persistent. Pakistanis are a very talented people, but years of corrupt rule of the corrupt army have deprived them of most of their civic, constitutional, and natural rights.

It appears that the American Empire does no more than invent and reinvent all kinds of slogans about democracy and freedom, and show off the First Amendment and "We, the People" drivel to gain moral superiority. But the people of Pakistan—besieged by depraved generals and bloodthirsty Taliban—will always say: "the Emperor wears no clothes!"
Link


Home Front Economy
U.S. official appeals for biotechnology to cope with food crisis
2008-06-14
(Xinhua) -- U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte said Friday that biotechnology tools should be used to help cope with the food crisis. "In the long term, we believe sustainable food security will come from advances in science and technology and the creation of an efficient global market for both agriculture products and food production technologies," Negroponte said during a speech at the World Food Price Laureate Announcement Ceremony.

"We therefore are strongly encouraging countries to remove barriers to the use of innovative plant and animal production technologies, including biotechnology," he said. "Biotechnology tools can help speed the development of crops with higher yields, higher nutrition value, better resistance to pests and diseases, and stronger food system resilience in the face of climate change," he added.

The international community has been grappling with soaring prices of corn, wheat, rice, soybeans and other agriculture products and price hikes have set off riots and protests from Africa to Asia.
Link


India-Pakistan
US outraged by Mehsud's impunity
2008-06-03
Baitullah Mehsud’s “jaunty appearance” at a press conference in South Waziristan underscores the wide latitude Pakistan’s government has granted the militants under a new series of peace deals, and its impact in Afghanistan, where and American commanders say cross-border attacks have surged since March, says a report published in the New York Times on Monday.

The report claimed that the “impunity” of Mehsud’s behaviour has “outraged” the Bush administration, which is pressing the Pakistani government to arrest and prosecute him.

Reluctant: “Bringing Baitullah Mehsud, the head of this extremist group in South Waziristan – capturing him and bringing him to justice, which is what should happen to him,” is what the United States wants from Pakistan, John Negroponte, the US deputy secretary of State, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last month. But the Pakistani government, which at times has considered Mehsud an ally and is now fearful of his power, appears reluctant to hunt him down.

Days before his news conference, Pakistani forces pulled back from South Waziristan as part of the peace deals. American and Pakistani officials accuse Mehsud of masterminding the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, a former prime minister, in December and sending scores of suicide bombers in Pakistan and in Afghanistan, while forging a symbiotic relationship with Al Qaeda on Pakistan’s frontier, the report pointed out.
Link


India-Pakistan
US urges Pakistan to nab Baitullah, in test of anti-terror zeal
2008-05-22
The United States asked Pakistan to arrest and bring to justice a Taliban militant commander Islamabad was negotiating with to underline its commitment to the "war on terror."

The commander, Baitullah Mehsud, who has been accused by the CIA of masterminding the assassination in December of ex-premier Benazir Bhutto, has been negotiating with the new Pakistan coalition government.

The government, led by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, has pledged to completely overhaul Islamabad's counter terrorism pursuit after defeating US-backed President Pervez Musharraf's political allies in February elections.

US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte told a congressional hearing Tuesday that Washington was concerned over the negotiations with the Taliban, whom US and NATO troops are fighting in neighboring Afghanistan.

He said Washington had repeatedly cautioned Islamabad about the talks despite a pledge from Gilani's government not to give "free space" to the extremist group using remote tribal areas as safe haven to attack Afghanistan.

Asked by a lawmaker how Washington would gauge any counter terrorism success notched by Pakistan, Negroponte said "one of the metrics" was a lessening of cross border attacks into Afghanistan.

"Another would be if you saw the government operating effectively against some of these militant extremists, like for example bringing Baitullah Mehsud, the head of this extremist group in South Waziristan, capturing him and bringing him to justice, which is what should happen to him," Negroponte said.

The United States, he said, was concerned there were "elements" in the Pakistan government pushing for a negotiated settlement with the Taliban, ousted from power in Afghanistan by US-led forces after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

"We hope that they proceed cautiously and not accept an outcome that will give extremist elements the ability to use the FATA (Federally Administered Tribal Areas) area with impunity to carry out attacks on Pakistan, on Afghanistan or the United States or the rest of the world," he said.

"There is a lot at stake here and we have made that point repeatedly," Negroponte said.

Citing a previously failed deal with militants in the FATA region, he said: "We have some skepticism about their ability to enforce any such arrangement."

Negroponte's concerns came despite an assurance by Pakistan Prime Minister Gilani, after talks with US President George W. Bush in Egypt at the weekend, that his government would not negotiate with militants unless they laid down their arms.

The Bush administration has warned that Al-Qaeda was rebuilding itself in Pakistan's FATA and North West Frontier Province, both on the border with Afghanistan.

Negroponte, a former US intelligence czar, also said that tripartite border coordination arrangements had been established to closely coordinate counterrorism operations among the United States, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

This three-way border coordination nexus "can focus exclusively on these common border issues between Afghanistan and Pakistan," he said.

He said there was also an effort underway under the auspices of the US National Security Council "to look at the border region in its entirety" as part of the counter terrorism drive. "The aim of course is to try and find ways to deal most effectively and support our friends in dealing as effectively as possible with this terrorist threat," he told reporters, without elaborating.
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistain signs peace deal with pro-Taliban militants
2008-05-22
Pakistan's new government signed a peace deal with pro-Taliban militants in a northwestern valley Wednesday, despite calls from the United States to clamp down on Islamist rebels.
They're the TNSM, the most inept "militants" in Pakistain. They were pretty much beaten until the gummint found an excuse to surrender to them.
The agreement will see the gradual withdrawal of troops from the devastated former tourist region of Swat and the imposition of Islamic Sharia law in line with the rebels' demands, provincial ministers said. In return the militants will close training camps, hand over foreign fighters and halt suicide attacks on government installations and security forces under the 15-point pact, they said.
Yep. They're gonna do that real soon now. Honest.
The United States took the gaspipe reacted cautiously to the deal, saying it would monitor whether such attacks stopped. "Those people are crazy! We'll reserve judgement on these things," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters, adding that fighting militancy required the "right mix" of security, political and economic measures.

The Pakistan army launched a major offensive in October to clear Swat of militants loyal to Maulana Fazlullah, a radical pro-Taliban cleric who led an uprising to enforce Sharia law in the valley.

US, NATO and Afghan officials have criticised previous peace deals in Pakistan, saying that they have led to an increase in suicide attacks on international and Afghan forces across the border in Afghanistan.

"The agreement was signed today between the government committee and representatives of local Taliban. We are very positive that this agreement will end violence and ensure lasting peace in the region," committee member and North West Frontier Province minister Wajid Ali Khan told AFP. "We have agreed on a gradual withdrawal of the troops as the situation improves. The Taliban will close down all training centres for suicide bombers and militant activities. They will not attack security forces," Khan said.

The militants had also agreed not to target girls' schools, music shops and barbers, all targets of the hardline militants who follow an interpretation of Islam echoing the 1996-2001 Taliban regime in Afghanistan, he said. "We have agreed to enforce the Sharia laws in the area," Khan added.

Officials said there was no agreement on the fate of Fazlullah, for whom the militants were demanding a general amnesty. The army has been hunting for him in the region's forests and mountains for months.

Afghanistan foreign ministry spokesman Sultan Ahmad Baheen criticised the the Swat agreement. "We believe any exclusive deal with the Taliban would result in worsening of the situation," Baheen told AFP. "We believe any sort of agreement with the terrorists would harm both countries."

US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte urged Pakistan on Tuesday to arrest a leading Taliban commander based in the tribal area of South Waziristan, with whom Islamabad is also negotiating. The commander, Baitullah Mehsud, has been accused by the CIA and the previous Pakistani government of masterminding the assassination in December of ex-premier Benazir Bhutto.

The new government, led by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, has pledged to completely overhaul Islamabad's counter-terrorism pursuit after defeating US-backed President Pervez Musharraf's political allies in February elections.

Negroponte said he would be encouraged to see Pakistan "operating effectively against some of these militant extremists, like for example bringing Baitullah Mehsud... capturing him and bringing him to justice, which is what should happen to him."
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More