Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

India-Pakistan
Pakistan poll shows suspicion of leaders
2008-01-14
Nearly half of Pakistanis surveyed suspect that government agencies or government-linked politicians killed Benazir Bhutto, according to an opinion poll, highlighting popular mistrust in the country's U.S.-allied president ahead of elections next month.
The other half know for sure who dunnit.
Bhutto, an opposition leader and former prime minister, was killed in a gun and suicide bomb attack on Dec. 27 that the government of President Pervez Musharraf has blamed on Islamic extremists.

Bhutto, who had been threatened by militants before, was a secular politician popular in the United States and other Western countries for her vocal opposition to hardline Islam.

Her political party and family members have accused the government of failing to provide her with sufficient security, contributing to her death, and some have made vague allegations that elements within Musharraf's government may even have been involved. Musharraf has denied any role in the slaying and there have been no specific claims of responsibility for her death.

Separately, Islamic militants attacked a Pakistani military base near the Afghan border, sparking fighting that killed between 40 and 50 insurgents in some of the deadliest clashes in weeks in the lawless region, the army said Sunday.

The army said up to 300 militants staged the attack in Lhada on Wednesday and early Thursday, but were repelled by artillery and small-arms fire.

The border region emerged as a front line in the war on terror after Pakistan allied itself with the U.S. following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Washington has given Pakistan billions of dollars in aid to help government forces battle militants.

The opinion poll asking who "killed" Bhutto, released Saturday, indicated that 23 percent of Pakistanis suspected government agencies in the slaying, while 25 percent believed government-allied politicians were behind it. Only 17 percent suspected al-Qaida or Taliban.
Probably some unholy alliance of all three.
The poll by Gallup Pakistan, which is affiliated with the Gallup International polling group, questioned 1,300 men and women in face-to-face interviews across Pakistan soon after Bhutto's slaying. It had a margin of error of 5 percentage points.

Gallup Pakistan said the survey, one of a series of regular polls, was not commissioned by any third party outside the company. Gallup International is a respected international pollster, but has no relation with the U.S.-based Gallup group. The two companies split from each other in 1994.

Information Minister Nisar Memon questioned the poll and its findings.

"I don't think this is representative of the thought process of the people of Pakistan and neither does it reflect the realities," he said of the survey. "It is very clear that people know that it is the terrorists who are responsible."

Musharraf, who has himself survived at least three assassination attempts blamed on militants, seized power eight years ago in a military coup. His popularity was already low before the Bhutto assassination amid demands for greater democratic rule.

The parliamentary elections, which will take place on Feb. 18 after being delayed for six weeks amid rioting triggered by Bhutto's death, are seen as key to Pakistan's transition to democracy.

Bhutto's party and the other major opposition grouping are expected to do well, in part because of sympathy over her death. But most analysts expect no party will gain enough seats to form a government alone and predict the election will result in a likely unstable coalition. Others fear that vote-rigging may taint the process and trigger fresh disputes.

Allegations of state involvement in Bhutto's death have been fueled by apparent government inconsistencies over precisely how she died. Video footage shows a man firing at her from close range as she pokes her head through the sunroof of her vehicle. Seconds later, the car is struck by a large explosion.

The government initially said she died when the force of the blast propelled her head into the sunroof of her vehicle.

Her supporters say she was shot dead, as some video footage of the incident appears to support.
Link


India-Pakistan
Sharifs reach deal with Perv
2007-11-25
Former premier Nawaz Sharif has reached an understanding with the government, whereby he and possibly Shahbaz Sharif may not destabilise the Musharraf regime or boycott the elections, according to sources in government. Also, while Sharif may not personally contest the upcoming general elections, Kulsoom Nawaz and Hamza Shahbaz would be allowed to contest the elections from Lahore, sources told Daily Times on Saturday.
Given the parties to the agreement, I'd guess it will be broken substantially within a week.
Nawaz, following a meeting with Saudi King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz, met with senior Pakistani officials and close associates of President General Pervez Musharraf, and agreed that the Sharif family could return to Pakistan as long as the PML-N did not boycott the elections, PML-Q sources told Daily Times. They said the understanding also involves the restoration of some of Nawaz’s business interests in the country and his Model Town residence. ISI DG Gen Nadeem Taj and Brig (r) Niaz, a mutual “friend” of Gen Musharraf and Nawaz, mediated the negotiations in Jeddah. The sources said that Nawaz had also agreed not to destabilise Gen Musharraf’s “transition” to democracy or try to overthrow him.

Conviction: According to the understanding, as revealed by PML-Q sources, Nawaz cannot contest the election because of his conviction, as has been stated by Attorney General Qayyum Malik. Shahbaz does not face any conviction but there’s a case of a plea bargain in which he is party as director of Hudaibia Mills and according to some legal experts, this is equivalent to a conviction and hence makes him ineligible.

However, caretaker Information Minister Nisar Memon has said that everyone is free to contest the polls, which is causing confusion and all sorts of rumours are being spread about the new understanding between the Sharifs and the government.
Link


India-Pakistan
Russia criticizes Pakistan
2002-06-03
En route to a regional summit in Kazakhstan, where he arrived Monday, Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf insisted that Pakistan would not start a war with India. "Pakistan's president has clearly said ... that no country will be thinking of this kind of thing to settle the dispute," Pakistani Information Minister Nisar Memon told reporters in Almaty. However, he refused to say why Pakistan would not rule out the first use of nuclear weapons as India has.

On the eve of talks between Russian President Vladimir Putin and the leaders of India and Pakistan, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov accused Islamabad of allowing terrorists from Afghanistan to cross into India. He assailed Pakistan for conducting missile tests that further exacerbated the crisis, which has pushed nuclear-armed India and Pakistan to the brink of war. "Armed terrorists and extremists from Pakistan keep infiltrating into Indian territory," Ivanov said. "This is a fact you can't turn a blind eye to. Moreover, terrorists who are entering India previously have been ousted from Afghanistan."

Ivanov also said the recent test-firing of nuclear capable missiles by Pakistan had further escalated tension over Kashmir. "Against the background of the conflict, the nuclear missile tests conducted by Pakistan were a provocative gesture," Ivanov said. "Any nuclear weapons tests conducted in an atmosphere of extreme tension and suspicion ... is wrong and provocative," he said. "This will definitely push New Delhi to take proportionate retaliatory measures."
Since we're "allied" with the Paks, Russia might be acting as our proxy in beating them up on the diplo front. They could be doing it because they're allied with India, but I'd guess that the criticism has been vetted with the U.S.
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistan urges world to make India 'see reason'
2002-05-20
Pakistan called for increased international efforts to make India "see reason" and begin negotiations as war clouds gathered over the two countries.
Perhaps Pakland could "see reason" and stamp out the cross-border terrorism originating on its side of the border. That would go a long way toward making India "see reason" and not invade them over it.
"We hope the international community will increase further its efforts considering the hostile postures adopted by India and convince India to see reason and come to the negotiating table for discussions and dialogue," said foreign ministry spokesman Aziz Ahmed Khan.
They only negotiate with domestic lunatics.
Asked at a news conference whether he thought war was imminent between the nuclear-armed neighbours, he said he was not in the business of "fortune-telling". Khan's comments came as Indian and Pakistani troops fought a fourth day of artillery duels across the de facto border in the disputed state of Kashmir. The border skirmishes erupted after India blamed Pakistan-based guerrillas for an attack last Tuesday in Jammu, the Kashmiri winter capital, that killed 35 people, mostly wives and children of soldiers.
Not being a "fortune teller," he can't quite see the connection between the artillery duels and the dead women and kiddies.
At least 10 people have been killed and more than 50 injured on the Pakistani side of the border since Friday, while Indian officials put their own toll at two dead, 23 injured and more than 12,000 people displaced.
If war does erupt, it was a set-up by the jihadis, and the contributing factor was Pakland's own stupidity in supporting them.
President General Pervez Musharraf has called a meeting Wednesday of his cabinet and the National Security Council (NSC), a top decision-making body, to review the escalation of border tensions. Information Minister Nisar Memon said the president would also consult political leaders "to take the nation into confidence regarding the situation arising out of the recent escalation of tension on the borders".
Maybe they should be working out something to defuse the tensions? Wouldn't that make at least a little bit of sense?
A government official told AFP that United States Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage was also due to arrive here early next month.
If there's anywhere left to arrive...
Armitage's trip closely follows US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Christina Rocca's visit to Pakistan and India last week in search of ways to avert "dangerous confrontation" between rival nuclear neighbours.
Her arrival was the occasion for the attack. If hostilities haven't started by the time Armitage arrives, expect another one of at least the same magnitude.
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistan rejects India's charges of hand in Jammu attack
2002-05-15
Pakistan dismissed Indian charges that it was involved in Tuesday's terrorist attack in Jammu in which 30 Indians were killed. "Whenever there are attacks in India, it claims that it is done by Pakistan. This is wrong and we totally reject this," Pakistan Information Minister Nisar Memon said. In the past too "they resorted to all kinds of methods to malign Pakistan. Let me say India has miserably failed in this game", he added.
His lips are moving, words are coming out, but they don't make any sense. Who the hell controls the Pakistan-based terror networks? Samoa? Greenland? Six guys with false moustaches in Saskatoon?
Memon said Pakistan stood with the international community in the fight against terrorism. "Pakistan itself is a victim of terrorism."
Virtually all of it home-grown, too...
Memon's comments came a day after three militants shot dead seven passengers of a civilian bus and then stormed the residential quarters of Indian troops near Jammu city and massacred 23 people, including five soldiers, eight women and 10 children.
Making his comments sound particularly cynical...
Memon said Pakistan curbed the activities of extremist groups and arrested many of their activists. "Our policy is not to allow anybody to use our soil for terrorism against any country."
Pakland arrests them, then springs them, arrests them again, then springs them. Sometimes it shoots them dead, then has to do it again two or three years later.
Link


India-Pakistan
Pak going after second and third tier thugs
2002-05-11
Information Minister Nisar Memon has said that law enforcement agencies, in the current crackdown on the banned militant organizations, are concentrating on arresting their second and third-tier leadership after the Karachi incident. A French team had already arrived in the country to assist Pakistani agencies to track down the culprits. He said the American Federal Bureau of Investigation was also involved in the investigation. The government, he explained, had sought the international assistance in the investigation in view of lack of expertise of the local agencies to investigate such cases on scientific lines.
He means that even they noticed the apalling ineptitude of the Keystone Pak Kops. Here's hoping Inspector Camembert and Special Agent Starchedshirt can help them out. The last time they had one of these crackdowns, they held the Bad Guys for three months without charging them, then released them after a good talking to.
Link


Terror Networks
Paks say al-Qaeda might be involved in hotel attack. Duh.
2002-05-09
The government has not ruled out the possibility of Al Qaeda's involvement in Wednesday's suicide attack in Karachi. "The attack has all the markings of a well-trained international terrorist organization," Federal Interior Secretary Tasnim Noorani said, adding that "this kind of operation is not carried out by the terrorist organizations operating within the country."
Izzat so? Just a month ago, Hizbul Mujahideen was bragging about how they "know the art of becoming human bombs."
Intelligence reports, senior interior ministry officials said, had warned that some 300 suicide bombers with Al Qaeda and Taliban links would be unleashed in May in a new offensive against the US interests and its allies around the world.
And this is the start of it? Could be. Could also be part of a campaign against Pak interests that they haven't quite noticed yet...
Sources said most of the terrorist cells of the Taliban and Al Qaeda network had the capability to be activated at short notice and most of them had spread their tentacles away from the main theatre of war in Afghanistan.
Meaning they've been chased out...
The threat of Al Qaeda activists to infiltrate into target countries and conduct suicide attacks against Western targets and critical infrastructure was grave, they said, adding that Pakistan was a target country for being a partner in the US-led war against terrorism.
Now we're starting to get down to it...
Suspecting that the attack might have a Taliban or Al Qaeda link, Federal Information Minister Nisar Memon said at a news conference that the government had decided to strengthen the country's western border with Afghanistan to reinforce vigilance against any infiltrations from across the border.
But, having screwed around for the past six months, it'll be late coming. The head cheeses and lots of trained gunnies are already comfortably ensconced in Pakland. Even worse, in the coming confrontation between Perv and the fundos, they're on the fundos' side.

By this point, Binny, assuming he still lives, and the Learned Elders of Islam behind him, have probably written off Afghanistan as a do-able. But Providence has presented them with a perfectly good substitute in either all of Pakistan, with its nuclear weapons, or Greater Pashtunistan, if they can't grab the whole thing. Toilet paper consumption at the Pak general staff must be at an all-time high, as they notice that 1.)they can't depend on ISI, a significant part of which is allied with the fundos; 2.)they've allowed potential threats to grow up on both their eastern and western borders - al-Qaeda/Talibs in the west, their home-grown Harkats and Hizbs in the east, reinforced by the mercenaries in Lashkar and Jaish. The probability of civil war is probably better than 80%, and rather than being prepared for it, these single-cheeked "generals" have been aiding and abetting the other side.
Link


India-Pakistan
Paks vow "merciless" campaign against violence
2002-03-20
  • Pakistan's military government said it would create new anti-terrorist units within the national security organizations as part of a "merciless" campaign to counter growing political and religious violence. Commentators say the attack has called into question the effectiveness of Musharraf's efforts to clamp down on Islamic militants and the credibility of the Pakistani ruler as an effective partner in the U.S.-led war on terror. "These terrorists deserve no sympathy and need to be dealt with firmly and mercilessly, albeit judiciously," Information Minister Nisar Memon quoted Musharraf as saying.
    Oooh, the stench! It's overpowering. You could fertilize all the farms in Pakistan with that "program." Just think: they're going to create anti-terror squads within "the national security organizations" -- oh, God! Hand me a tissue! When I think of the ISI running an "anti-terrorist" squad and arresting itself... Oh, why, why can't I believe it?
  • Link



    Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
    -8 More