Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Home Front: Politix
Marianne Williamson: I am not a 'wacky new-age nutcase'
2019-07-31
[THEHILL]

Marianne Williamson Leads A Prayer Apologizing For Being White



A Guide to Marianne Williamson, the Spiritual Guru Running for President
Williamson is a 67-year-old “thought leader” who has been a spiritual adviser to Cher, an officiant at one of Elizabeth Taylor’s weddings, and a confidant of Oprah Winfrey. She has also written four New York Times best-selling books, including A Return to Love and Illuminata. And, though she dislikes being described as a spiritual “guru,” she decidedly is.

As evidenced by her decades-long career, Williamson probably wouldn’t describe herself as a politician. However, this isn’t the first time Williamson has run for office. In 2014, she launched an unsuccessful bid for then-soon-to-retire Representative Henry Waxman’s seat in Southern California — a campaign that garnered the support of Kim Kardashian West, Eva Longoria, and Nicole Richie, among many other celebs. Hell, Alannis Morissette wrote and recorded a song for Williamson’s campaign, titled, “Today.”
What is her platform?
Williamson certainly has some slightly unusual proposals addressing some of the biggest issues plaguing America — the climate crisis, mass incarceration, our broken health-care system — but she has thrown her support behind most of the big progressive issues. Were she to become president, she vows to protect reproductive rights and LGBTQ rights. She wants universal basic income. She thinks college should be free, and that student debt should be forgiven. She supports reparations, and understands our criminal-justice system is, in actuality, “terribly unjust.” Also, Medicare-for-all: She wants that, too. (During the 2016 presidential election, she wrote an open letter to Hillary Clinton, urging her to stop “cozying up” to “the plutocracy now ruining this country”; Williamson endorsed Bernie Sanders.)


Link


Home Front: Politix
Sandra Fluke Passes on U.S. House Bid, Aims for California State Senate
2014-02-06
[MEDIAITE] Just hours after filing paperwork with the intention of seeking the Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party, Democratic Party's endorsement to replace retiring 20-term Rep. Henry Waxman
...the funny-looking Democrat Representative-for-Life from Caliphornia. First elected in 1975, his estimated retirement date is 2075 or maybe later...
(D-CA), Democratic activist Sandra Fluke announced on Tuesday that she was passing on that opportunity and aiming instead to be elected to the state Senate.

"I am extremely moved by the outpouring of local and national support I have received since I announced that I was considering running for office," Fluke said in a statement released late Tuesday night. "While I strongly considered offering my candidacy for Congress, I feel there is a better way for me to advance the causes that are important to our community."
Hidden in all the foolishness known as Sandra Fluke is that there's a model of party control and governance at work here.

The Democrats work very hard on cultivating a deep, deep bench of activists, and have done so for decades. It comes out of the machine politics from the mid 19th century on. You grab them young and develop them. Some of them flame out, some of them lose interest, some of them are so goofy that the leadership abandons them, but some of them, cultivated for a long, long time, pay off. A few pay off big.

Barack Obama: a nobody. But some folks took an interest in him (either in his early Chicago days or even before when he was at Columbia) and started grooming him. The Chicago machine helped as did the Ayers/Chicago radical machine. Obama got press time, information, tips, appointments to various boards, a shot at state senator, and so on. Did anyone think back in the early 90s that he was going to be president? No, not really, but they cultivated him.

Elizabeth Warren: a nobody, graduate of a lower tier law school, a dense and pedantic lawyer and policy advocate. But she was groomed, aided, given jobs, given opportunities, and boom -- now she's Senator Pedantic.

Sandra Fluke is a nobody. Follow her career to date and you'll see the guiding hands of the progressive Left grooming her. She's been a feminist, an 'activist' and a law student (where did she get the money for that, I wonder). She'll be prepped and prepared until the day comes when she cashes in. Ms. Fluke's "career", as you would have to call it at this point, needs more of that cultivation. She's not quite ready for the big time of 'Congresswoman Fluke', though given some of the clowns the Dems have put in those seats you have to wonder. But if she sits in the state senate for a decade or so, builds a lot of connections and chits, and waits her turn, then she can get a seat in Congress. Or run for state-wide office. Or she can get a safe, high-paying NGO job at some point to build her financial portfolio (no Reynolds revolving door tax, alas) and her Rolodex. Then back to government. Maybe a spot high in DHHS if Hillary wins.

Remember, this is how Democrats play the game. It's one of the things the Open Society, foundation, union and NGO folks do best -- find and groom people who can then be put into elected office or political appointed office. Who then do as they're, er, asked, to do.

Look for the pattern in these progressive apparatchiks. The nomenklatura has been grooming them.
Link


Government
Typhoon Scares Dems; Want Hearings on Climate Change
2013-11-15
House Democrats on Wednesday seized on the devastating typhoon that hit the Philippines to call for a hearing on extreme storms and climate change.
Maybe everybody would forget about Obamacare?
Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Bobby Rush (D-Ill.) said Typhoon Haiyan shows the need for the House Energy and Commerce Committee to explore the link between the changing climate and natural disasters.

Waxman and Rush said Republicans should abandon the efforts to stop Obama's climate change regulations and instead "hold a hearing with the world's leading experts on the relationship between extreme storms like Typhoon Haiyan and climate change."
Might be interesting, if both parties got to call their own "experts".
The letter cited a leaked Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report that said sea level rises, coastal flooding, storm surges and more are a direct result of climate change.
Link


-Land of the Free
This Week in Guns, July 20th, 2013
2013-07-20


By Chris Covert
Rantburg.com

Americans own nearly half of the privately owned firearms on the planet, says the National Journal. They say that like it's a bad thing.

California congressman Henry Waxman has written legislation to ban 80 percent (unfinished) gun receivers. Pretty funny, but not so funny if the left gains both houses in 2014.

At the moment it appears that 80 percent receivers for the popular AR-15 pattern rifles are hard to find, as production has not matched demand. Ares Armor is one supplier, but they are out. H&H Tactical is another, but has only four left in stock. According to the St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner, KT Ordnance has sold more than 10,000 80 percent receivers for AR pattern rifles, AR-10 and AR-15.

And that's just the AR pattern receivers. AKs are another matter altogether.

Is Waxman really going to ban all those rifles?


Rantburg's summary for arms and ammunition.

Pistol Ammo

.45 caliber, 230 grain, From Last Week: Unchanged
Cheapest, 50 rounds: Ammo Supply Warehouse: Wolf FMJ Steel cased .42 per round
Cheapest Brass cased, 50 rounds: PMC Bronze, .42 per round

.40 Caliber Smith & Wesson,180 grain, From Last Week: +.05 each
Cheapest, 50 rounds: Gander Mountain, Remington, .40 per round
Cheapest Bulk, 500 rounds: LAX Ammunition, reloaded, .32 per round

9mm Parabellum, 115 grain, From Last Week: Unchanged
Cheapest, 50 rounds: High Country Ammunition, Range Master, .34 per round
Cheapest Bulk, 1000 rounds: Bluecore Shooting Center, reloaded, .30 per round

.357 Magnum, 158 grain, From Last Week: -.03 each

Cheapest, 50 rounds: Cabelas, Herter's Select Grade .46 per round
Cheapest, Bulk 1000 rounds: Ammo Supply Warehouse, Sellier & Bellot, .49 per round

Rifle Ammunition

.223 Caliber/5.56mm 55 grain, From Last Week: -.02 each

Cheapest, 20 rounds: Ammunition to Go, PMC Xtac, .44 per round
Cheapest Bulk 1000 rounds: Battle Bag Ammo, reloaded, .40 per round

.308 NATO 145 grain, From Last Week: +.05 each

Cheapest, 20 rounds: Ammunition to Go, Prvi Partizan FMJ, .65 per round
Cheapest Bulk, 500 rounds: Ammoman, Prvi Partizan FMJ, .80 per round

7.62x39 AK 123 Grain, From Last Week: -.02
Cheapest, 20 rounds: Selway Armory,Wolf Ammo, steel core and case, .28 per round
Cheapest, Bulk, 1000 rounds: Ventura Munitions, Wolf Ammo, steel core and case, .27 per round
Cheapest, Brass casing: Ables, Fiocchi, .56 per round for 1000

.22 LR 40 Grain, From Last Week: -.03 each

Cheapest, 50 rounds: Gander Mountain, CCI, .10 per round
Cheapest, Bulk, 1000 rounds: Ammunition Supply Warehouse, Amscor, .15 per round

Guns for Private Sale
Rifles

.223/5.56mm (AR Pattern Semiautomatic)
California: Smith & Wesson: $925
Texas: Smith & Wesson .223: $629
New York: Smith & Wesson: $700
Maryland: Bravo Company USA: $1,100
Florida: Bushmaster XM-15E2S A2: $829

.308 NATO (AR-10 Pattern Semiautomatic)
California: Sig Sauer 716: $1,600
Texas: Smith & Wesson: $1,250
New York: DPMS Panther Arms LR-308: $900
Maryland: DPMS LRT-SASS /w scope : $2,600
Florida: DPMS Stainless Bull Barrel: $1,200

7.62x39mm (AK Pattern Semiautomatic)
California: Russian Arsenal: $1,300
Texas: Century Arms: $800
New York: None
Maryland: Saiga: $500
Florida: Saiga: $550

7.62x54mm (Dragunov Pattern Semiautomatic)
California: Romak PSL: $1,700
Texas: None
New York: None
Maryland: None
Florida: Romak PSL: $1,100 (Same Gun)

.45 caliber ACP (M1911 Pattern Semiautomatic Pistol)
California: Citadel, : $700
Texas: Federal Ordnance, Stainless Steel barrel, $550
New York: Sig Sauer Tacpac, $450
Maryland: Rock Island Armory, Citadel, $600 (Same gun)
Florida: Taurus: $589
Link


Home Front: Politix
Waxman: Obama Should Regulate Oil Refineries, Household Appliances to Stop Global Warming
2013-02-16
But I thought we all bought new appliances with government help a few years ago in order to fix that. Did we not thusly cool the sun's passion?
[CNSNEWS] Representative Henry Waxman
...the funny-looking Democrat Representative-for-Life from Caliphornia. First elected in 1975, his estimated retirement date is 2075 or maybe later...
(D-Calif.) said the B.O. regime should regulate oil refineries, household appliances, and even renegotiate climate treaties if Congress does not pass legislation dealing with global warming.

"The president will be taking action by executive order through his administration," Waxman said at a presser on Friday unveiling his Safe Climate Caucus, which will work to pressure House Republicans to take up a climate change initiative.

Waxman, who said that Obama's executive actions would also pressure the GOP, explained that there were several things the administration might do to address global warming.

"We've asked the White House to coordinate their activities throughout the various departments and the various areas within the administration," Waxman explained. "The EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] can do a lot more. They've proposed regulating new power plants to control emissions, they can go forward and complete that rule."
Link


Economy
Obama lobbying Senate Dems against Keystone XL pipeline
2012-03-08
First, Barack Obama won't make a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline, until House Republicans force his hand and he denies approval. Then Obama claims to want an "all of the above" energy policy and the White House "welcomes" the news that TransCanada would start building the pipeline anyway. Just how "welcome" was that news? According to Politico, Obama has begun to lobby Senate Democrats against an effort that would expedite approval for Keystone:

President Barack Obama is intervening in a Senate fight over the Keystone XL oil pipeline and personally lobbying Democrats to reject an amendment calling for its construction, according to several sources familiar with the talks.

The White House lobbying effort, including phone calls from the president to Democrats, signals that the vote could be close when it heads to the floor Thursday. The president is trying to defeat an amendment that would give election-year fodder to his Republican critics who have accused him of blocking a job-creating energy project at a time of high gas prices.


The pipeline would create 20,000 jobs and provide a much-needed expansion of North American oil resources to American refineries in the Gulf of Mexico. Even the NYT's Joe Nocera recognizes the ability of Keystone and the massive amounts of natural gas in the US to free us of our dependency on overseas oil resources. Obama's own State Department -- on which Obama tried to lay the blame for the permit rejection -- stated in a report that the Keystone pipeline was strategically critical for the US, and that the risk to the environment was overstated:

TransCanada Corp. (TRP)'s proposed $7 billion pipeline to Gulf Coast refiners poses "no significant impacts to most resources" along its route across six states, a U.S. State Department environmental review found. ...

The pipeline is needed to maintain supplies of heavy crude oil to Gulf Coast refineries as imports decline, according to today's State Department report. Imports from Mexico andVenezuela are falling while refining capacity in the Gulf Coast is projected to rise by 500,000 barrels a day by 2020.

Alberta oil is separated from sand and clay with intense heat in a process that releases more greenhouse gases than pumping conventional crude. Representative Henry Waxman, a California Democrat, has said the pipeline will carry "the dirtiest source of transportation fuel" available.


With gas prices spiking upward, voters will wonder why Obama seems so keen on blocking a pipeline that will create jobs, bring more supply on line, improve the US strategic position on energy, and pose little risk to the environment. That doesn't look at all like an "all of the above" solution, or a "welcoming" attitude, does it?
He was against it, before he was for it, before he was against it. But only if that is what you want.
He's against and has always been against it. But he also knows it will hurt his re-election campaign, and so has to play this game.
Link


Home Front: Culture Wars
Waxman - D (CA) likens GOP to terrorists for legislative tactics
2012-01-27
A senior Democratic congressman likened Republican lawmakers to terrorists on Thursday for their insistence on tying approval of construction of a new oil pipeline to must-pass legislation.

California Rep. Henry Waxman, the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the coauthor of the 2009 cap-and-trade climate change bill, decried efforts by the GOP to force the Obama administration into approving a permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline.

"They want to use legislation as a way to act like terrorists. They hold things as hostage," Waxman said. "We almost couldn't fund the government because Republicans wanted to hold that idea hostage, we almost couldn't pay our debts because the Republicans wanted to hold that legislation hostage to their extreme agenda, and I wouldn't be surprised if they scuttled this conference by trying to hold us hostage."
advertisement

Waxman was referring specifically to rumblings from Republicans that they might attach the provision to legislation extending a payroll tax cut through the end of 2012. Waxman is one of the 20 bipartisan negotiators who are working to reach an agreement on that extension by Feb. 29, when the current extension is set to expire.
What a whiny bitch.
As usual, it's a case of progressive projecting...
Link


Economy
EPA to Regulate Dirt
2011-10-27
[Human Events] House members of the Energy and Commerce Committee bickered about the definition of dust in a hearing about a Republican bill to stop overreaching Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations.

Democrats at the hearing on the Farm Dust Regulation Act of 2011, sponsored by Rep. Kristi Noem (R.-S.D.), fired a number of vicious shots at the the bill, calling it merely a red herring. They claimed that the EPA doesn't regulate dust at all, and that the wording of the bill was intended to strip the EPA's power to regulate other destructive particulates, such as soot from urban factories.
See, there aren't any EPA regulations about dust.
Republicans claimed that the bill would prevent future EPA dust regulation that is currently on the books
Ummm...
"Farmers and ranchers that are already subject to the standard for dust in 'nonattainment' areas like Arizona know its impact on businesses," explained Noem. In Arizona, it can cost some producers over $1,000 per day to comply with dust standards."
There aren't any EPA regulations about dust but they're on the books... I'm confused. How about you?

from strangling farmers and businesses with red tape, and that the current regulations hurt farmers and increase the headache and cost of compliance.
... even though they don't exist.
Rep. Henry Waxman
...the funny-looking Democrat Representative-for-Life from Caliphornia. First elected in 1975, his estimated retirement date is 2075 or maybe later...
(D.-Calif.) summed up the Democrat opposition with some over-the-top rhetoric: "Today's hearing considers yet another bill to allow more air pollution, more asthma and more heart attacks. And once again, it's a bait and switch."
I'll betcha it sez nothing about any of those in the text of the bill...
Waxman also said that the bill would have "sweeping environmental effects," and that stopping the regulation of dust is "pure fantasy."
Stopping any kind of hyper-regulation seems to be pure fantasy...
"EPA does not regulate farming practices to reduce dust, and has expressed no intention of doing so in the future," said Waxman.
Then his lips fell off.
Rep. Ed Markey
...U.S. Representative-for-Life from Massachusetts, serving since 1976. He is a member of the Democratic Party, naturally....
(D.-Mass.) compared HR 1633 to an Internet hoax spread to gin up anger about a fake e-mail tax increase, and then compared it to a bill regulating fairy dust.

"Just like the e-mail tax hoax, there is no plan to regulate farm dust any more than there is to regulate fairy dust. There is no attempt to accomplish that goal," said Markey.

Although Democrats insisted that the bill was just a fantasy based on trumped-up, imaginary regulation, backers of the bill said otherwise.

Rep. John Shimkus (R.-Ill.) asked Noem, who was on the panel of witnesses, "How many agricultural groups are in support of this bill?"

Noem answered, "Over 100."

Shimkus then said, "Are they just crazy? They have nothing else to worry about but just the EPA?"

"Waxman continued to say over and over that their dust is not regulated, and it is. The EPA does regulate dust, and the [EPA] staff considered tightening those standards," Noem continued. "When he says there is no concern, there is valid concern in rural America.

One of the agricultural groups that is supporting the bill, the National Association of Wheat Growers (NAWG), wrote a letter to the committee last month, saying that a slight raise in overall particulate matter standards would require the EPA to regulate farm dirt under the current standards.

"And, for what purpose? Scientific studies have never shown rural dust to be a health concern at ambient levels," said the NAWG letter.

In her written testimony, Noem explains exactly how the EPA regulates dust. "Under current law, the EPA's standards include all types of dust, including dust generated from agricultural activities and the dust that is typical of rural areas. This type of dust is naturally occurring and includes soil, windblown dust, and dust coming from dirt roads. I call it farm dust."

"Farmers and ranchers that are already subject to the standard for dust in 'nonattainment' areas like Arizona know its impact on businesses," explained Noem. In Arizona, it can cost some producers over $1,000 per day to comply with dust standards."
Link


Home Front: Politix
Waxman sees bright side to November: 'Difficult' Democrats won't be back
2010-08-06
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) believes the November elections will likely weed out some of the "most difficult Democrats" that leadership lawmakers have dealt with this Congress.

In an interview with The Hill, the Energy and Commerce Committee chairman expressed confidence that Democrats will retain the House, and suggested he won't miss some of the Democrats who won't be back next year.

"I think a lot of the House seats we're going to lose are those who have been the toughest for the Democrats to pull into line -- the Democrats that have been the most difficult," Waxman said.

Waxman, one of the Democratic Party's stalwarts, is simply voicing publicly what many in his party have said privately as the reality of the looming November elections sets in. If Democrats retain a majority, it will be smaller but more cohesive.

As Waxman sees it, the fractious coalition of Democrats that House leaders have cobbled together to pass sweeping healthcare and energy bills is not markedly different from the bipartisanship of the past, when Democrats partnered with centrist and liberal Republicans, whom Waxman says are "practically nonexistent at the moment."

"We've been trying to get the Democratic conservatives together with the rest of the Democratic Party, so in effect we've gotten bipartisan support among Democrats in the House," the chairman said with a laugh. "Now we'll have to work on genuine bipartisanship in the future."

For much of the early part of his career, the liberal Waxman battled conservative Democrats from the South on the direction of the party. Years later, Waxman is still waging that fight, but now he wields the gavel of one of the most powerful panels in Congress. Waxman became chairman after successfully challenging Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), the former chairman, in 2008.

Waxman has rewarded loyalty to the Democratic agenda through his leadership political action committee, L.A. PAC. Each of the 14 donations of $5,000 the committee made after the final healthcare vote in March went to Democrats who voted yes.

A single contribution of a lesser amount, $3,000, was sent in April to Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho), one of the party's most vulnerable members, who voted against the bill. In January, Waxman gave $10,000 to Rep. Zack Space (D-Ohio), a month after he voted for the initial House version of healthcare reform. Two months later, Space voted against the final bill.

Democratic conservatives serve little purpose for Waxman, who seemed to relish the thought that a strengthened GOP would mean that the minority party would have to play ball.
Link


Home Front: Politix
The Other National Debt
2010-06-14
About that $14 trillion national debt: Get ready to tack some zeroes onto it. Taken alone, the amount of debt issued by the federal government -- that $14 trillion figure that shows up on the national ledger -- is a terrifying, awesome, hellacious number: Fourteen trillion seconds ago, Greenland was covered by lush and verdant forests, and the Neanderthals had not yet been outwitted and driven into extinction by Homo sapiens sapiens, because we did not yet exist. Big number, 14 trillion, and yet it doesn't even begin to cover the real indebtedness of American governments at the federal, state, and local levels, because governments don't count up their liabilities the same way businesses do.

Accountants get a bad rap -- boring, green-eyeshades-wearing, nebbishy little men chained to their desks down in the fluorescent-lit basements of Corporate America -- but, in truth, accountants wield an awesome power. In the case of the federal government, they wield the power to make vast amounts of debt disappear -- from the public discourse, at least. A couple of months ago, you may recall, Rep. Henry Waxman (D., State of Bankruptcy) got his Fruit of the Looms in a full-on buntline hitch when AT&T, Caterpillar, Verizon, and a host of other blue-chip behemoths started taking plus-size writedowns in response to some of the more punitive provisions of the health-care legislation Mr. Waxman had helped to pass. His little mustache no doubt bristling in indignation, Representative Waxman sent dunning letters to the CEOs of these companies and demanded that they come before Congress to explain their accounting practices. One White House staffer told reporters that the writedowns appeared to be designed "to embarrass the president and Democrats."

A few discreet whispers from better-informed Democrats, along with a helpful explanation from The Atlantic's Megan McArdle under the headline "Henry Waxman's War on Accounting," helped to clarify the issue: The companies in question are required by law to adjust their financial statements to reflect the new liabilities: "When a company experiences what accountants call 'a material adverse impact' on its expected future earnings, and those changes affect an item that is already on the balance sheet, the company is required to record the negative impact -- 'to take the charge against earnings' -- as soon as it knows that the change is reasonably likely to occur," McArdle wrote. "The Democrats, however, seem to believe that Generally Accepted Accounting Principles are some sort of conspiracy against Obamacare, and all that is good and right in America." But don't be too hard on the gentleman from California: Government does not work that way. If governments did follow normal accounting practices, taking account of future liabilities today instead of pretending they don't exist, then the national-debt numbers we talk about would be worse -- far worse, dreadfully worse -- than that monster $14 trillion--and--ratcheting--upward figure we throw around.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Dick Morris Predicts GOP Landslide
2010-04-18
The man considered one of the premier sculptors of Bill's Clinton's re-election in 1996 predicted Friday night that Republicans would take control of the Senate and the House in mid-term elections this fall.

Noting that he keeps reading quotes from GOP leaders such as Republican National Chairman Michael Steele that they are "optimistic" about the elections this fall, Dick Morris told a packed dinner at the Pennsylvania Leadership Council: "I've got news--it's not even going to be close, guys."

Fresh from addressing a 4,000-strong Tea Party in Arkansas, Morris--best-selling author, syndicated columnist, and Fox News commentator--held the PLC audience spellbound with his bold predictions.

"Republicans will win the Senate with 52 or 53 seats," Morris said without hesitation, "and the House will go Republican by 10 to 20 seats."

The former Clinton strategist-turned-Republican pointed out that it will take a minimum of 39 seats to change from Democrat to Republican for the GOP to win a majority. Seven of those 39, he predicted, "will come from right here in Pennsylvania--the epicenter of change."

Beginning with a Republican pick-up of the Western Pennsylvania seat of the late Democratic Rep. John Murtha in the special election May 18, Morris said that the GOP's gains in the Keystone State would come from unseating Democratic Representatives Kathy Dahlkemper, Jason Altmire, Patrick Murphy, Christopher Carney, and Paul Kanjorski. (Although that ads up to only six, others at the dinner told me Morris came to his figure of a gain of seven by automatically factoring in the likely pickup by GOPer Pat Meehan of the Delaware County district vacated by Senate hopeful Joe Sestak).

As to the claims of Altmire (who voted twice against the Obama-backed healthcare bill) that he is a "moderate Democrat," Morris recalled his days as a "moderate Democrat" in the 1990's working with Bill Clinton on issues such as "tough love" welfare reform and cutting the capital gains tax.

"Today, the moderate Democrat is as extinct as a do-do," declared Morris, "I am extinct." He said that in the Democratic Party of today, "you are either an Obama-Reid-Pelosi Democrat or you are a Republican. I am a Republican." Morris also quoted Ronald Reagan that "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me."

And even if moderate Democrats weren't extinct, he added, "the first vote any of them would cast would be to make Nancy Pelosi speaker, put [California Rep.] Henry Waxman in charge of energy policy, [Mississippi Rep.] Bennie Thompson in charge of homeland security, and [Massachusetts Rep.] Barney Frank in charge of the banking and financial industry. No other vote matters after that one."

The leftward drift of the Democratic Party under Obama ("the most liberal President in history," Morris said) and its agenda of "nationalilzing healthcare, cap and trade, and card check" was the reason he felt Republicans would have a banner political year in 2010.

In suggesting that clashes between a Republican Congress and Obama could lead to a government shutdown similar to that of 1995, Morris predicted that congressional Republicans would not experience the blame they did 15 years ago. He explained that "people didn't blame President Clinton because he was not trying to raise spending. Everybody knows that Barack Obama has raised spending and will blame him. And we will win."
Link


Home Front: Politix
Health care hit didn't take long
2010-03-31
While most of the purported benefits of health-care insurance reform are years away, it took only a few days for a serious, unintended consequence to emerge.

Last week, telecommunications giant AT&T, which employs more than 280,000 people, announced it would take a $1 billion, non-cash, first-quarter loss because the bill ends an exemption on benefits for retirees.

Likewise, the largest maker of earth-moving equipment, Caterpillar, claims it will take a $100 million charge. Deere & Company, the world's largest producer of agriculture equipment, will take a $150 million charge. 3M, maker of Scotch Tape and other products, says it will take a hit of as much as $90 million.

It's all because a provision in the bill reduces the tax deductions for companies with drug coverage for their retired employees. The tax deduction and the subsequent government subsidies were designed to encourage those companies to keep their retirees covered rather than foisting them onto Medicare.

Now, it's likely those companies and others will simply shuffle those once covered under the private sector to Medicare. If not, corporations could offset the costs with layoffs or shift the cost to consumers.

Some business groups say the provision is a blow to corporate profits, and also could discourage companies from hiring more workers. Reform backers say those charges are overblown.

Verizon already has notified its employees to expect changes to their benefit plans because, it says, the new law "may have significant implications for both retirees and employers." And with more than 3,500 American companies no longer able to benefit from this tax structure, the number of employees affected is only going rise.

The tax exemption, offered as part of 2003's Medicare Part D, was a means of incentivizing companies to keep retirees on their prescription drug coverage plans. The Obama administration claimed that closing this supposed loophole would raise about $4.5 billion over 10 years to help offset the cost of the nearly $1 trillion health care reform.

Yet The Associated Press has reported that a large utility company in Michigan already has stated it would recover all losses from its customers through rate hikes.

Instead of acknowledging that top-down economic planning usually brings with it some unintended costs, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., immediately politicized the news by attacking industry. Without any authority, Waxman demanded that AT&T, Verizon, Caterpillar, and John Deere justify the "costs the companies plan to book related to the new health-care law."

Many of the hidden costs of this law will be evident soon enough, but we hope this provision doesn't end up costing the country more than it was meant to save.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More