Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Government Corruption
John Brennan's Checkered Past Comes Back to Haunt Him Amid DOJ Investigation
2025-07-12
[Self Reliance Central] Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. Recently, Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Trump Department of Justice have said they are running an investigation into James Comey’s and John Brennan’s careers as the respective FBI director and the CIA head during the Obama administration and, in the case of Comey, the first year of the Trump administration.

They are very angry about this, but let’s just review why there might be some culpability.

Take John Brennan. He was a big proponent of waterboarding and enhanced interrogation under President George W. Bush’s administration and the things that went on in Guantanamo. I’m not gonna comment on whether they were right or wrong. But he flipped to condition himself to go into the Obama administration, and then he attacked the very president that he had served, George Bush.

Then he began sounding off about Islam—"Religion of Peace"; "Jihadism is not a violent act"—to condition himself further to be appointed by President Barack Obama, which he was, eventually, a CIA director. But then he started lying. I mean, he always probably lied, but I mean, flagrantly so.

He said before Congress and the media there wasn’t one civilian killed by Obama’s targeted assassination program via Predators on the Afghan or Pakistan border. Actually, there were 50 or 75 innocent people we killed. He was caught in that lie.

Three years later, he went before the Congress and there was information that he had been tapping, his CIA, the staffers for the Senate to get into their computers. He not only lied about it, he did so emphatically—"Oh, we would never do that. That’s horrible." Then he was forced to say, "Yes, I lied." In both cases, there were no perjury charges, nothing.

The pièce de résistance for John Brennan was in October 2020, on the eve of the second and critical presidential debate, Joe Biden was in trouble. People were furious about this laptop. There was pornography on it. There was drug use. There were references to Joe Biden as "Mr. Big Guy." Ten percent that he’d been giving money. He was crooked. People wanted to hear, he had no excuse.

So, what happened? Antony Blinken, his future secretary of state, campaign aid, called Michael Morell, interim CIA director at one point, said, "Round them up."

So, 51 "intelligence authorities" swore the laptop had all the hallmarks of Russian information. Notice the words: All the hallmarks, escape clause, of Russian information. Not disinformation, but that’s what they meant.

So, what happened in the debate? Donald Trump went right after Biden and said, "That laptop is real. It shows that you’re a crook. It shows your son is a miscreant."

And Joe Biden’s, "How dare you? Fifty-one Intelligence authorities swear that it’s a product of Russian espionage. Only you and Rudy Giuliani believe that." And it was effective.
Link


Home Front: Politix
By Halting The Federal Judiciary's Left Turn, Trump Has Saved America
2025-07-10
[AMERICANTHINKER] What Donald Trump
...The Hero of Butler, Pennsylvania...
has achieved in the first six months of his non-sequential second term borders on the unprecedented. The most lasting and impactful accomplishment will be Trump's ongoing victories in permanently reining in a rogue and increasingly radicalized federal judiciary. His electoral victory in 2024 and uncompromising battles with the judiciary have rescued the United States from an irreversible decline and fall.

Over the past 70 years, the federal judiciary has increasingly assumed the extra-constitutional role of arbitrarily setting the boundaries of congressional and presidential authority. This has been an evolutionary process that reflected the American left's long-term strategy of appointing collectivist judges to the federal judiciary.

All Marxist-inspired despots of the twentieth century understood that party or state control over the judiciary is a key factor in successfully transforming a nation into a one-party socialist or communist state. This process was dramatically accelerated in the United States after Barack Obama
I am the change that you seek...
became president. During his two terms in office, he and the Democrat party, per the Marxist blueprint, were singularly focused on radicalizing the federal judiciary.

This single-minded determination culminated in Obama and his minion, Joe The Big Guy Biden
...46th president of the U.S. Sleazy Dem machine politician, paterfamilias of the Biden Crime Family...
, appointing vast numbers of radical left-wing judges during their combined twelve years in office. The unabashed and unconstitutional lawfare directed at Donald Trump and the January 6th protestors was a manifestation of their success.

Since the beginning of Trump's second term, dozens of Obama-Biden district court judges have unconstitutionally interjected themselves in Trump's lawful exercise of executive power, issuing an unheard 45-plus national injunctions in less than six months.

From the Constitution's ratification until the dawn of the Twentieth Century, courts did not issue any nationwide injunctions. Beginning in 1900 and spanning 21 presidencies, courts issued 170 nationwide injunctions. Of those, 112—or 65% of all national injunctions over 249 years—came during the four years of Trump's first term and six months of his second. By comparison, per the Harvard Law Review, the last Republican president, George W. Bush, experienced just six nationwide injunctions over eight years.

It is not a coincidence that this avalanche of injunctions began after the Obama presidency, during which he appointed hundreds of radical district judges. There are currently 631 serving District Court judges in 94 districts, and Obama and Biden appointed over 60% of them. This makes it easy to find a judge sympathetic to the Marxist-inspired Democrat party and willing to issue unconstitutional nationwide injunctions or conduct rigged trials against political adversaries.

After experiencing a record 64 nationwide injunctions during his first term, surviving the egregious travesty that was unconstitutional lawfare directed at him, and observing the appalling and blatant political persecution of the January 6th protestors, Trump came into office in 2025 single-mindedly determined to take on this Marxist monolith.

Trump knew that the Democrats
...every time you hear the phrase white people, white supremacy, white anything but paint, you're listening to a Democrat. Ask him/her/it to reimagine something for you; they do that a lot, though not well. They can hear a dog whistle a mile or two away. They invented the spoils system and Tammany Hall, and inspired the addition of the word (Thomas) Nasty to the English language. They want to stop continental drift and repeal the law of unintended side effects...
' strategy was to derail his agenda. During the four years of his second term, they intended to file lawsuits continuously with their dependable sycophants in the judiciary. These judges would then issue an unending avalanche of judgments, restraining orders, and national injunctions that would freeze the Trump agenda.

They theorized that Trump would either openly defy lower court orders, thus alienating the Supreme Court and becoming susceptible to accusations that he was a fascist
...anybody you disagree with, damn them...
-inspired dictator, or he would not be able to aggressively marshal the legal team and strategy to fight continuous battles in innumerable district courts, the circuit courts, and ultimately the Supreme Court.

Trump, however, knew what was coming. Before his inauguration, he assembled an experienced and loyal legal team that was later installed in the Justice Department and the White House Counsel's office, expressly to contest the anticipated lawsuits.

Upon assuming office on January 20, 2025, Trump turned the tables on his feckless and fatuous adversaries by immediately issuing a massive number of executive orders. The Democrat party strategy was immediately exposed to the public as they and their fellow travelers predictably filed 328 lawsuits in the first 100 days of his presidency, stretching their credibility and resources to the limit.

Most importantly, Trump wisely allowed the processes to play out and did not traffic in unhinged accusations or hyperbole when reacting to the inane (and insane) lower court rulings and injunctions. However,
some men learn by reading. A few learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves...
he made clear he would never back off in contesting every judgment, restraining order, and injunction. Lastly, he never threatened to ignore any court order, regardless of its merits or constitutionality.

These overall tactics caught the Democrat machine by surprise as they assumed Trump was incapable of restraint. Trump's willingness to respect the separation of powers was not lost on the Supreme Court Justices, who would be the final arbiters of the validity of many rulings, especially the constitutionality of nationwide injunctions.

As a result, Trump has amassed an unexpected winning streak, not only before the Supreme Court but in many lower courts, too. This streak included the monumental win in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which saw the Supreme Court permanently and dramatically limit district courts' power to issue nationwide injunctions. This effectively eliminates a major tool Democrats use to thwart their political opposition and abet their transforming America.
Link


Britain
Former UK Labour leader Corbyn, ousted over antisemitism, to found new party
2025-07-05
Welcome to Britains’s New Left party — all Jew-hate all the time. And socialism, gooder and harder.
[IsraelTimes] Jeremy Corbyn says Starmer’s government has ‘refused to deliver the change’; lawmaker who supported Palestinian violence says she’ll join him in new left-wing party

Former UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn announced on Friday he was in talks to start a new political party because Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government had "refused to deliver the change" that voters expected during its first year in office.

Labour suspended Corbyn in 2020 and then kicked him out of the party following a report into how antisemitism complaints were handled under his leadership, which he refused to fully accept.

"The democratic foundation of a new kind of political party will take shape soon," Corbyn said on X. "Discussions are ongoing — and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve."

The announcement that Labour could face a new threat from a left-wing party came after a bruising week for the government when it was forced to abandon key planks of planned welfare reform, which blew a hole in its budget plans.

Since winning the general election last year, Starmer has seen his personal popularity slump, and Labour now consistently trails the hard boy, right-wing Reform UK party, which is led by Nigel Farage, the pro-Brexit campaigner.

Corbyn, who was elected an independent member of parliament last year, said the "Labour government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved."

"Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable," he said. "Our country needs to change direction, now."

On Thursday evening, politician Zarah Sultana said she was leaving Labour and planned to launch the new party with Corbyn.

In since-deleted social media posts from 2015, Sultana said she would celebrate the deaths of former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, former US President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. She also wrote that she supports "violent mostly peaceful resistance" by Paleostinians and that Zionism is a racist ideology.

A landmark October 2020 report by the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission ruled that Labour under Corbyn had broken the law in its "inexcusable" handling of complaints about antisemitism.

The period saw Jewish members and politicians leave the party in droves as criticism of Israel and Zionism veered into toxic antisemitism from Corbyn supporters.

The party suspended Corbyn in 2020 after he claimed opponents had "dramatically overstated" the scale of antisemitism in Labour for "political reasons." He had represented Labour in parliament since 1983 and now sits as an independent politician.
Related:
Jeremy Corbyn 06/01/2025 UK trade envoy visits Israel despite freeze in talks on free trade agreement
Jeremy Corbyn 02/16/2025 Thousands in London protest Trump’s Gaza proposal, demand arms embargo on Israel
Jeremy Corbyn 01/21/2025 UK police question Labour ex-chief Corbyn over anti-Israel march; 77 arrested, 9 charged

Related:
Zarah Sultana 09/29/2023 Mohamad al Bared guilty of terror offence after designing 'kamikaze' drone for ISIS
Zarah Sultana 03/23/2021 'Racism Is a Feature of Capitalism' Claims Labour MP Zarah Sultana

Link


Home Front: Politix
Obama and Bush Unite in Rare Move Against Trump
2025-07-02
How unstatesmanlike. President Bush, at least, was trained in good manners, and knows better. Poor President Obama was brought up by Communist spies, and so all he understands is power plays. Not that anyone cares what either of them think on the subject, as President Bush never mastered the Deep State and President Obama co-opted it, inasmuch as they were not his enthusiastic fellow travellers.
[Daily Beast] Former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush have joined forces to shoot down President Trump’s "colossal mistake" to shutter the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The Trump administration cut around 90 percent of USAID’s foreign aid contracts during Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) rampage back in February. Musk oversaw the depletion of the workforce from 10,000 to less than 300.

The agency will be absorbed by the state department, where it will be replaced by a new organization called America First.

In a farewell video message to staffers on Monday, USAID’s last day before it is folded into the state department, the two former presidents decried its treatment by Trump.
Link


Economy
Biden Admin Accelerated White-Collar Job Transfers to Migrants Via Student Visa Programs
2025-06-08
[Breitbart] President Joe Biden’s deputies massively accelerated the transfer of U.S. white-collar jobs to foreign graduates, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

The bad news was revealed in a June 5 report by the Department of Homeland Security which showed massive jumps in job transfers via the two Optional Practical Training [OPT] work-permit programs:

In 2024, a total of 194,554 foreign [graduates] obtained [new] work authorization through OPT, while a separate population of 95,384 foreign [graduates] obtained work authorization through STEM OPT [sub-program], and 130,586 foreign [undergraduate] students obtained work authorization through CPT [for undergraduates].

Compared to 2023, this was an increase of 21 percent for OPT, an increase of 54 percent for STEM OPT [emphasis added].

“In 2024, the total number of unique foreign student SEVIS records with work authorization … [was] 381,140 [emphasis added],” the report added. That number included 165,524 foreign graduates in the two-year STEM OPT program.

A chart posted at a DHS website showed that Biden’s deputies raised the population of college-migrants with “Employment Start Dates” by 98,425 from 2020 up to 399,909 in 2024.

Total Number Annual OPT STEM CPT Authorizations
Total Number of Annual OPT, STEM-OPT, and CPT Authorizations
The chart may understate the number of OPT college-migrants in U.S. jobs because it seems to exclude many of the 62,306 STEM-OPT migrants who may have started using their two-year work permits in the prior year.

The 400,000 work permits issued to foreign college-migrants in 2024 likely have a huge career impact on the roughly 800,000 Americans who graduate with technology-intensive, four-year degrees in business, science, computer, math, architecture, and healthcare. Census data from 2021 showed that many Americans are pushed out of the technology careers and salaries they studied to achieve.

By subscribing, you agree to our terms of use & privacy policy. You will receive email marketing messages from Breitbart News Network to the email you provide. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Nationwide, companies use multiple visa programs — such as the H-1B visa — to cut salary costs by keeping at least 1.5 million foreign white-collar visa workers in jobs sought by Americans.

Biden’s pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas, expanded the OPT programs by allowing universities to relabel many non-technology degrees as high-tech STEM degrees. For example, in January 2022, Mayorkas added 22 new courses to the STEM-OPT category, including forestry, data visualization, environmental studies, and organizational psychology.

Many of the university migrants are hired via ethnic and family networks that discriminate against Americans. Those programs are also a springboard for migrants to win H-1B visas, U.S. careers, and U.S. citizenship.

Overall, foreign students can use university payments to get four years of work permits, regardless of the quality of the education. The dangled promises of U.S. work permits raise at least $40 billion in extra revenues for the universities and colleges each year.

The expanded foreign-worker programs were quietly created by President George W. Bush deputies without approval by Congress. Biden’s deputies also allowed employers to get a 15 percent tax break for hiring the college migrants in place of Americans.

But Trump recently announced he would prefer to halve the number of foreign students. “We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can’t get in because we have foreign students there,” Trump said as he suggested the universities should lower the population share of foreign students from 27 percent to 15 percent.

The agency’s 2024 data showed that almost 2,366 Harvard students held OPT work permits. Another 2,218 held J-1 visas, often for federally funded work in universities’ laboratories.

Trump is also using his control over the student visas to force universities to comply with federal civil rights laws, end their illegal diversity policies, and reduce their cooperation with China. “Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,” a Harvard lawsuit insists.

In 2024, Indians comprised the largest national group in the work permit programs. India sent 422,235 students or college-workers, while China’s resident population dropped slightly to 329,541.

India’s college-migrant population has more than doubled since 2020, when 207,460 Indians were enrolled in U.S. colleges. In 2019, 63,744 Indians were enrolled in the STEM-OPT program.

The Indian population in the United States is rising because India’s industrial policy seeks to transfer its huge population of mixed-skill graduates into white-collar jobs across the developed world and especially into the United States. The resident population of Indian students or workers rose by 12 percent in 2024, the report noted:

Most foreign students participating in the post-completion science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) OPT extension were from India (48.0%) or China (20.4%).

The CPT and OPT programs are a subset of the many mixed-skill visa programs that keep at least 1.5 million foreign graduates in white-collar jobs that would otherwise go to U.S. graduates and professionals. The imported workers have little power or inclination to argue with the C-Suite, ensuring massive damage to American careers, salaries, productivity, and innovation.

The work permit programs are rarely mentioned by establishment media outlets. When they are mentioned, it is usually in a favorable tone that ignores the damage to Americans. For example, the Associated Press reported on May 30:

Many international students come to the U.S. with hopes of gaining work experience and returning to their home countries or pursuing a career in the U.S. But the administration’s intensifying scrutiny of international students — and signs that formal career pathways for them may be closed — are leading some to reconsider their plans.



Like many international students, Marko, 29, finds himself glued to the news with a growing sense of alarm. His Optional Practical Training expires in a month, and he has applied for an extension but hasn’t heard back, leaving him in limbo. Lawyers for the tech company where he works in New York City advised him to carry proof of his legal status in his wallet, which he finds “dehumanizing.”

The AP article was headlined: “Career pathways in the US dim for international students as Trump cracks down on visas.”

Reporters rarely, or never, report the damage to Americans.

Computer professional Jim from Herndon recently told Breitbart News that he has a nephew who graduated last year with a degree in engineering and computers, and a nephew who is about to graduate with a degree in Geographic Information Systems: “They found nothing, so they think they’ll be doing lifeguarding in the summer.”

STEM graduates “only have two years after they graduate to get a pipeline [career-starting job], and then [recruiters] move on to the next new grads,” he said. In contrast, his two nieces with degrees in sociology and film studies landed administration and marketing jobs for roughly $100,000, he added.

This semi-official media silence helps to minimize Americans’ understanding of the white-collar outsourcing that threatens their livelihoods and their children’s careers.

The white-collar inflow has deeply damaged career prospects for many American graduates who are locked out of career-starting jobs by foreign graduates. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently reported:

The labor market for recent college graduates deteriorated noticeably in the first quarter of 2025. The unemployment rate jumped to 5.8 percent — the highest reading since 2021 — and the underemployment rate rose sharply to 41.2 percent.

The unemployment rate for high-tech graduates was higher than average, according to the report. For example, the unemployment rate for “computer engineering” graduates was 7.5 percent, and for “computer science” graduates was 6.1 percent.

“Something strange, and potentially alarming, is happening to the job market for young, educated workers,” the Atlantic magazine reported in April. “Even newly minted M.B.A.s from elite programs are struggling to find work.”
Link


-Land of the Free
Trump names nominees to take over commands in Middle East and Africa
2025-06-06
[AnNahar] President Donald Trump
...The cad! Twice caught beating wimmin!...
is nominating Vice Adm. Brad Cooper to take over as the top U.S. military commander in the Middle East, the Pentagon said Wednesday. If he is confirmed, it would mark just the second time that a Navy admiral has held the job.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a statement that Trump also is nominating Air Force Lt. Gen. Dagvin Anderson to head U.S. Africa Command. Anderson would be the first Air Force general to lead the command, which was created in 2007.

Cooper is currently deputy commander of U.S. Central Command and has extensive experience serving and leading troops in the Middle East. The current head of the command, Army Gen. Erik Kurilla, is slated to retire after more than three years in the post.

It is a crucial role as the region has been shaken by conflict, with the Trump administration pushing to broker a ceasefire deal after 20 months of war in Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppression and disproportionate response...
and pressing for an agreement with Iran
...a theocratic Shiite state divided among the Medes, the Persians, and the (Arab) Elamites. Formerly a fairly civilized nation ruled by a Shah, it became a victim of Islamic revolution in 1979. The nation is today noted for spontaneously taking over other countries' embassies, maintaining whorehouses run by clergymen, involvement in international drug trafficking, and financing sock puppet militias to extend the regime's influence. The word Iran is a cognate form of Aryan. The abbreviation IRGC is the same idea as Stürmabteilung (or SA). The term Supreme Guide is a the modern version form of either Duce or Führer or maybe both. They hate Jews Zionists Jews. Their economy is based on the production of oil and vitriol...
in negotiations over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program.

A 1989 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, Cooper commanded naval forces in the Middle East for close to three years as the head of the Navy's 5th Fleet in Bahrain. He left in February 2024 to take over as deputy at Central Command, which oversees U.S. military operations in the Middle East and is based in Tampa.

Army and Marine generals have largely held the Middle East job since it was created in 1983. And two of the recent leaders — former Army Gen. Lloyd Austin and former Marine Gen. Jim Mattis, went on to serve as defense secretary. Central Command covers 21 countries across central and south Asia and northeast Africa and has overseen the conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, Syria and Yemen
...an area of the Arabian Peninsula sometimes mistaken for a country. It is populated by more antagonistic tribes and factions than you can keep track of...
The only Navy officer to ever lead Central Command was Adm. William Fallon, who resigned after a year and retired. At the time, Fallon said he was stepping down due to press reports that suggested he was opposed to then-President George W. Bush's Iran policies. He said the reports were wrong but the perception had become a distraction.

Cooper is a surface warfare officer and served on guided-missile cruisers, destroyers, aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships. He commanded a destroyer and a cruiser.

During his time leading the 5th Fleet, Cooper set up the Navy's first unmanned and artificial intelligence task force, and he led naval operations against the Iran-backed Iran's Houthi sock puppets
...a Zaidi Shia insurgent group operating in Yemen. They have also been referred to as the Believing Youth. Hussein Badreddin al-Houthi is said to be the spiritual leader of the group and most of the military leaders are his relatives. The legitimate Yemeni government has accused the them of having ties to the Iranian government. Honest they did. The group has managed to gain control over all of Saada Governorate and parts of Amran, Al Jawf and Hajjah Governorates. Its slogan is God is Great, Death to America™, Death to Israel, a curse on the Jews They like shooting off... ummm... missiles that they would have us believe they make at home in their basements. On the plus side, they did murder Ali Abdullah Saleh, which was the only way the country was ever going to be rid of him...
rebels in Yemen. He also oversaw the Navy's role in Operation Prosperity Guardian, the U.S.-led coalition created in late 2023 to counter Houthi attacks on fat merchantmen in the Red Sea.

He previously served as commander of Naval Surface Force Atlantic and commander of U.S. Naval Forces Korea. Cooper is the son of a career Army officer and got his master's degree in strategic intelligence from the National Intelligence University.

Anderson, nominated to lead operations in Africa, is a pilot who has flown the KC-135 tanker, the C-130 transport aircraft and the U-28A surveillance aircraft used largely by special operations forces. He has flown more than 3,400 flight hours, including 738 in combat.

He is currently serving as the director of joint force development on the Joint Staff.

According to the Air Force, he commanded a special operations squadron, an expeditionary squadron, an operations group and a special operations wing. He also led the task force that coordinated the repositioning of U.S. forces from Somalia and headed Special Operations Command, Africa, from 2019 to 2021.

Africa Command is the newest of the Pentagon's geographic commands and covers the bulk of the African continent. Much of the U.S. military's efforts there have focused on combatting holy warrior groups and training local forces.

Anderson would be the seventh general to head Africa Command. To date, four of the previous leaders were Army generals and two were Marines.

Anderson is from Ypsilanti, Michigan, and graduated from the ROTC program at Washington University in St. Louis.
Related:
Dagvin Anderson 02/27/2020 Isis and al-Qaeda join forces in West Africa

Related:
Brad Cooper 01/09/2025 Sana'a attacked by US-British aggressors again - CENTCOM pounds Houthi tunnelbase
Brad Cooper 05/24/2024 US service member critically injured during work on Gaza pier
Brad Cooper 05/24/2024 $320 Million Mistake-Pentagon says none of the aid unloaded from US pier off coast of Gaza has been delivered to broader Palestinian population

Related:
Erik Kurilla 04/13/2025 RUMINT: Yemeni gov't reportedly preparing 80,000 man assault on Houthi-controlled Hodeidah port
Erik Kurilla 04/04/2025 Top US general in Israel for talks amid massive American military buildup in region
Erik Kurilla 03/02/2025 US kills senior Hurras al-Din leader in northwest Syria

Related:
Lloyd Austin 03/23/2025 US beefs up warship presence in Mideast, will have 2 aircraft carriers in region
Lloyd Austin 01/27/2025 Trump to reinstate service members discharged for not getting COVID-19 vaccine
Lloyd Austin 01/23/2025 Pentagon sending additional 1,500 troops to southern border: US official

Related:
Jim Mattis 01/30/2025 Trump says he'll send 30,000 illegal migrants to Guantanamo Bay
Jim Mattis 10/21/2021 Trump Organization under tax investigation — report
Jim Mattis 08/22/2021 Afghanistan Proves Our Failed Generals No Longer Care About Winning

Link


Arabia
Trump, UAE leaders agree to $200 billion in new deals amid historic visit: 'Enhancing market access'
2025-05-16
[FoxBusiness] First US presidential visit to UAE in 17 years yields major investments in American manufacturing and technology

President Donald Trump facilitated over $200 billion in commercial deals between the U.S. and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) during his historic visit to the Middle Eastern country, according to the White House.

Several deals were made, including securing a $14.5 billion commitment from Etihad Airways to invest in 28 American-manufactured aircraft from Boeing and GE Aerospace.

Emirates Global Aluminum is also investing $4 billion to develop a primary aluminum smelter project in Oklahoma, and Holtec International and IHC Industrial Holding Company plan to build a fleet of small modular reactors in Michigan.

Qualcomm is also investing in a global engineering center in Abu Dhabi which will "focus on AI, data centers, and industrial [internet of things]," according to the White House.

"RTX is [also] partnering with Emirates Global Aluminum and the UAE’s Tawazun Council on a pioneering Gallium project that will help secure and stabilize the United States' critical mineral supply chain," the statement added.

"By diversifying sources of this essential input for semiconductors and defense technologies, the partnership strengthens America's supply security, supports high-tech manufacturing, and creates jobs across the U.S. critical minerals and defense industrial base."

In a statement, the White House said that Trump "continues to advance the interests of the American people, enhancing market access for American exporters to strengthen our economic and national security."

"These deals will significantly expand investment in the United States and U.S. market access in the United Arab Emirates," the statement added.

The deals came after the UAE pledged a $1.4 trillion investment in the U.S. economy over the next ten years. The investment money would go to AI infrastructure, semiconductor, energy and American manufacturing initiatives.

Trump is the first U.S. president to visit the UAE in 17 years, following President George W. Bush's trip in 2008. On Thursday, the president told reporters that it was "an honor to be here."

"The last four days have been really amazing, and they have been amazing," Trump said. "But it shows you where a country can go."
Related:
Commercial deals 05/14/2025 U.S. Inks Massive $142 Billion Arms Deal with Saudi Arabia
Commercial deals 09/15/2020 New evidence makes Hunter Biden's ‘business' deals reek worse than ever
Commercial deals 02/09/2016 Pay to play: Peugeot to pay $475m in Iran sanctions compensation

Related:
United Arab Emirates: 2025-05-14 Trump says he’ll lift sanctions on Syria, restore ties with new president Sharaa
United Arab Emirates: 2025-05-13 Trump Tower Damascus? Syria seeks to charm US president for sanctions relief
United Arab Emirates: 2025-05-12 Hamas set to free US-Israeli hostage Edan Alexander Monday in goodwill gesture to Trump
Link


-Lurid Crime Tales-
MAGA demands immediate arrest of former FBI director James Comey after he 'called for assassination'
2025-05-16
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] Former FBI director James Comey is under investigation for implying President Donald Trump 'should be assassinated.'

Comey uploaded a cryptic picture on his Instagram account on Thursday afternoon, which featured an assortment of shells arranged to spell out: '86 47.'

That specific combination of numbers has been linked to the assassination of Trump and a 'quiet resistance.'

The number 86 is considered slang for 'to kill or murder' within some circles, in an apparent reference to a standard sized grave being eight feet long and six feet deep.

Trump is the 47th president, so some anti-Trump groups use the two numbers together to indicate that Trump should be assassinated.

Department of Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem exploded at Comey on X within hours of the post, amid mounting fury from MAGA loyalists.

'Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just called for the assassination of President Trump,' she wrote.

'DHS and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately.'

Comey swiftly deleted the Instagram photo, but not before it was seized upon and shared widely among right-wing X accounts.

Trump's son Don Jr. weighed in on Thursday, expressing shock over the post.

He wrote: Just James Comey causally [sic] calling for my dad to be murdered. This is who the Dem-Media worships. Demented!'

Trump ally and newly appointed FBI chief Kash Patel also addressed the scandal, writing: 'We are aware of the recent social media post by former FBI Director James Comey, directed at President Trump.

'We are in communication with the Secret Service and Director Curran. Primary jurisdiction is with SS on these matters and we, the FBI, will provide all necessary support.'

Comey issued a statement on Thursday night insisting it was an honest mistake and he did not understand the connotations of the message.

'I posted a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message,' he wrote.

'I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.'
If he were serious instead of lying through his teeth, he’d be dumber than a box of hair. Instead he’s trying to gaslight more than half the country while winking in solidarity at the other half. But it’s been that way for a while — remember when that rodeo cowboy in the Obama mask was arrested, while plays and books about successful plots to assassinate Republican presidents starting with George W. Bush have been applauded and awarded industry prizes?
Link


Home Front: Politix
Supreme Court allows Trump's ban on transgender troops to take effect
2025-05-07
[10News] The U.S. Supreme Court will allow the Trump administration to enforce its ban on transgender individuals serving in the military.

The White House had asked the high court to lift a lower court’s injunction — a request the justices granted. Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson said they would have denied the application.

President Donald Trump issued an executive order banning transgender people from serving in the military. The order argued that the presence of transgender service members "conflicts with the soldier’s commitment" and harms military readiness.

In March, U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle — a George W. Bush appointee — ruled in favor of transgender service members challenging the policy. He said that discharging them would damage their careers and reputations.

An Obama-era policy implemented in 2016 allowed transgender individuals to serve openly. But during Trump’s first term, he reversed that policy, issuing a ban that allowed exceptions for active-duty service members who had already begun the transitioning process.

When President Joe Biden took office, the ban was rescinded.

Courtesy of Besoeker, a different angle on the story:
SCOTUS Lets Trump Pentagon Trans Ban Take Effect, for Now

[FOX] The Supreme Court has sided with the Trump administration in lifting a lower court's order that paused the Pentagon's transgender military ban.

In a short order on Tuesday, the high court handed the White House win as Trump seeks to unmake the Biden-era diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) agenda. The court stayed a lower court order, allowing the Pentagon policy to take effect. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson would have denied the administration's appeal and kept the lower court injunction in place.

At issue in the suit, Shilling v. United States, is President Donald Trump's January executive order banning transgender military members. The order required the Department of Defense to update its guidance regarding "trans-identifying medical standards for military service" and to "rescind guidance inconsistent with military readiness."

And from Skidmark, this necessary background: Social Media Reacts To HHS Review On Trans Treatments That Debunks Nike Study: ‘Just Don’t Do It’
Related:
U.S. Supreme Court: 2025-04-27 SCOTUS's Refusal To End Leftists' Judicial Coup Is Damaging Its Credibility More Than The Media Ever Could
U.S. Supreme Court: 2025-04-22 Magnificent Stephen Miller Blows Up the Left's Birthright Citizenship Fallacy
U.S. Supreme Court: 2025-04-19 Sanctuary Supreme Court Halts Trump Deportations Under Alien Enemies Act
Related:
Ban on transgender 02/28/2025 Trump moves to bar trans people from US military unless they obtain waiver
Ban on transgender 02/05/2025 LGBTQ+ advocates, families sue Trump admin for ending funding of transgender healthcare under 19
Ban on transgender 01/23/2025 Trump revokes Biden order allowing transgender troops in bid to rid DEI from military

Link


Government Corruption
100 Days Off-Plan: Why Trump Fired National Security Advisor
2025-05-02
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Malek Dudakov

[REGNUM] Washington lasted exactly one hundred days before the first major reshuffle in the White House began. Right on that date, the disgraced US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz was dismissed.

Rumors of his dismissal have been circulating for a long time. After all, it was Waltz who managed to find himself in the epicenter of the drama with secret chats in the Signal messenger. He “accidentally” added journalists there, who revealed the inner workings of Donald Trump’s team.

However, the Signal scandal is more of a pretext for Waltz's dismissal. The real reasons lie somewhat deeper.

The figure of the now-retired adviser initially provoked a less than positive response from many MAGA activists and Trump supporters.

Waltz looked to them like a typical hawkish neocon of the 2000s. Incidentally, he had even managed to work for a time in the George W. Bush administration.

Waltz's choice in forming the team was made for several reasons.

First, he was part of a club of Florida politicians who have serious influence in Mar-a-Lago. Waltz has been a congressman from Florida since 2019 and was involved specifically in the international and military agenda. His previous military service experience was evident.

His military background is the second reason why he was chosen. He was a colonel in the US Army Special Forces. The current Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is also from there.

Trump wants to bet on these special forces in the context of his major reform of the US military machine. In his first term, he paid more attention to the Marines, but now the priorities have changed.

Waltz tried his best to adapt to the president's agenda and hide his hawkish views, but he did not always succeed.

Waltz's wife, Julia Nesheiwat, was also criticized. She worked as a military intelligence officer in several American administrations, specializing in the Middle East region. She also collaborated with the Davos Forum and the Council on Foreign Relations, although they were ideologically closer to the Democrats.

In recent times, Waltz has been the most vocal proponent of escalation in the Middle East among Trump's apparatchiks.

He proposed not only waging war against the Houthis, but even launching a missile strike on nuclear facilities in Iran.

At the last moment, these intentions were stopped by the realists in the White House - J.D. Vance and Tulsi Gabbard. After all, the consequences of such radical militarism could be catastrophic - with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and chaos on the world oil market.

After the Signal chat scandal, Waltz was asked to step back for a while. Trump promised to give him a talk but not fire him.

But then the situation began to change. The first hundred days of the presidency were approaching, and there were not many successes to brag about to voters.

The trade wars have ended in complete chaos and attempts to quickly negotiate with individual countries to remove tariffs. Dialogue with Russia and Iran is ongoing, but it will clearly take longer to achieve any significant deals.

The White House's standoff with European hawks continues. However, in the end, they managed to force Kyiv to sign the forced "rare earth" deal.

Ukraine ultimately received neither security guarantees nor promises of new investments. For Trump, this is now a reason to announce the possibility of earning $350 billion from the development of Ukrainian mineral resources. Regardless of how many minerals will actually be extracted on the territory of this country.

They tried to sign the deal on Ukraine just in time for the 100th day of the presidency, so that the White House could be told of some success. But this is clearly not enough.

And now Waltz has simply been made the scapegoat for all the mistakes and failures of Trump's first three months in office.

It is the president's prerogative to fire his advisers, and this can be done by simple executive orders. There is no need to wait for Senate approval and confirmation, as is the case with ministerial appointments.

The positions of the other two hawks in the White House, Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, are also quite shaky.

The first one also managed to get into trouble due to leaks of secret data. For some reason, he took his wife to closed meetings of NATO defense ministers.

Rubio, like Waltz, simply cannot boast of any successes in his first hundred days.

However, replacing them is a much more difficult process. It will take too long to push new candidates through the Senate.

Waltz could be replaced by Steve Witkoff, the current special envoy for contacts with Russia and Iran. He is now literally carrying the entire US foreign policy on his shoulders.

Witkoff, unlike Waltz, is a realist and does not want to allow a major escalation - be it in Ukraine or the Middle East. This may mean that, for example, the Trump team is now abandoning the concept of a direct military attack on Iran.

However, for now, Rubio will serve as acting national security adviser.

Whitkoff will certainly be under pressure to achieve progress in Russian-American negotiations.

The White House has already set itself the next deadline - the second hundred days, which expire closer to mid-August. During this time, it is necessary to show results both in contacts with Russia and in dialogue with Iran.

After today's reshuffle, Waltz received a consolation prize: the job of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Trump's team had originally wanted to appoint New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, but that idea was ultimately abandoned.

The reason is that the Republican majority in the House of Representatives is very fragile: every vote is worth its weight in gold. So the retired Waltz is sent to the UN, where he can criticize China, Iran and other opponents of the United States with a clear conscience.

The White House shakeup could be seen as an admission by his team that their first 100 days have not gone according to plan, although Trump's second term has been far less chaotic than his first.

But if serious progress is not achieved in the second hundred days, there will be a reshuffle with ministers.

Recently, news appeared about Rubio's possible presence at the Victory Day celebrations on May 9 in Moscow. Washington has not confirmed the information, but the White House may well send some emissary to Russia.

The US administration needs to intensify negotiations on Ukraine, sanctions, Iran and other important topics. For Trump's foreign policy team, this is now an obvious priority.

She wants to act again using the carrot and stick method. Offer Russia her own version of a deal on the Ukrainian crisis and at the same time threaten to introduce 500% secondary tariffs on oil if the negotiation process drags on.

Rubio could very well play the role of the bad cop in this dialogue.

However, in any case, the apparatus positions of the hawks in the White House will gradually weaken after Waltz’s resignation.

In the future, much will depend on the current international situation and the ability of the American administration to influence it.

Overall, the intra-apparatus confrontation between hawks and realists in Trump’s team will likely be long-lasting and will determine the White House policy for the next four years.

Link


Government Corruption
Regarding Trump’s many “due process” controversies
2025-04-28

Continued
I believe people are mixing the legal standards up or are unaware of them. I also believe the legacy media is demonstrating double standards in pretending these presidential powers aren’t (for the most part) lawful.

Take, for instance, the IIRIRA.

In 1996, congress specifically authorized the executive branch to conduct non-judicial deportations NOT SUBJECT TO DUE PROCESS. [a] While one might argue against this on ethical grounds, one cannot argue that the president lacks the authority. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) was passed by Bill Clinton [a], enforced by George W. Bush, and expanded by Barack Obama, with support from both political parties.

PER CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS:
“The expedited removal process, created by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, is codified in INA § 235(b)(1).

The statute permits the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to summarily remove aliens arriving at a designated U.S. port of entry (arriving aliens) WITHOUT FURTHER HEARING OR REVIEW if they are inadmissible either because they (1) lack valid entry documents, or (2) tried to procure their admission into the United States through fraud or misrepresentation. INA § 235(b)(1) also authorizes—but does not require—DHS to extend application of expedited removal to "certain other aliens" inadmissible on the same grounds if they (1) were not admitted or paroled into the United States by immigration authorities and (2) cannot establish at least two years' continuous physical presence in the United States at the time of apprehension.” [a]

To be clear, this wasn’t always the case. As the ACLU wrote back in the Obama administration:

“The deportation system has dramatically changed over the past 19 years – moving from a judicial system prior to 1996, where the vast majority of people facing deportation had immigration court hearings, to a system today of nonjudicial removals, where 75 percent of people removed do not see a judge before being expelled from the U.S. The numbers are staggering: in 1995, 1,400 immigrants were subject to nonjudicial removals, representing 3 percent of total deportations. By FY 2012 that number had sharply increased to 313,000 nonjudicial removals.” [b] So to reiterate, all the way back in 2014, the ACLU specifically cited that 75% of Obama’s deportees had NO DUE PROCESS.

[b] I’m outlining these complaints from the ACLU not necessarily to agree with them nor to disagree with them, but to demonstrate that this presidential power was well established prior to Trump. Unless you were deeply involved in following the ACLU’s advocacy, you likely weren’t aware anyone took issue with it. This - yet again - exposes the legacy media’s double standards. They were silent regarding Obama’s use of non-judicial removals, going so far as to let him classify his administration as “scandal free”[c], yet when Trump’s in office, non-judicial removals become a scandal.

Per the American Immigration Council:

“Individuals placed in expedited removal generally have no right to challenge their deportation in federal court, thanks to jurisdiction-stripping provisions in the 1996 law which created the process. …Individuals may only bring a lawsuit challenging their expedited removal order if they are a lawful permanent resident, or someone already determined to be a refugee or granted asylum, who has been wrongfully subject to expedited removal. In 2020, the Supreme Court upheld this law, finding that it did not violate the right to habeas corpus or due process. Expedited removal has become a bedrock of the United States’ processing of noncitizens, particularly at our southern border.” [d]

The law also made deportation eligibility retroactive and introduced penalties for overstaying visas, including bars on reentry for certain periods. It also made it more difficult for undocumented immigrants to adjust their status, even if they had family members who were US citizens. [e] I’m again pointing this out not to argue for or against it, but merely to demonstrate that these expanded authorities existed prior to Trump. This is not a power grab. His office was granted this authority by democratically elected legislators.

Up until now, I’ve been discussing the 1996 law which allowed expedited removal under Section 235 of the INA. That pivoted away from the usual removal proceedings which were governed under Section 240 of the INA. It’s Section 240 (the usual process) where suspected illegal aliens are afforded a hearing (due process) in front of an immigration judge. [f] If someone doesn’t qualify for expedited removal, only THEN are they entitled to that formal hearing.

That was the case until Trump named some groups “terrorist organizations” while invoking the Alien Enemies Act, however.

When Trump entered office the 2nd time, he designated several globally powerful gangs as terrorist organizations. These massive organized crime networks had been competing with governments around the world for control, often by forcing businesses to pay them “taxes”. They were guilty of human trafficking, drug trafficking, murder, rape, extortion, and racketeering.

This is worth pointing out since the Anti-Terrorist and Effective Death Penalty Act,” also passed in 1996, criminalized the act of providing material support or resources to terrorist organizations [g] and has been argued by the New York Law Review to have encroached on due process. Again, as is the theme of this editorial, I’m not noting this to agree or disagree, only to demonstrate that the power existed before Trump. It was a 1996 law, and formally designating someone as a terrorist means they legally have different entitlements.

As for the Alien Enemies Act? Here, too, exists an authority granted to the presidency by congress in 1798. “It allows the president to detain or deport the natives and citizens of an enemy nation. The law permits the president to target these immigrants WITHOUT A HEARING and based only on their country of birth or citizenship. Although the law was enacted to prevent foreign espionage and sabotage in wartime, it can be — and has been — wielded against immigrants.” [h]

CONCLUSION:
Whether violating the concept of due process concerns you or not, these ARE legal pathways toward deportation. Each case is different, where some were deported under the expedited removal standard, others deported under Section 240, and others deported under the Alien Enemies Act, but these legal pathways were all created by Congress. I won’t deny that the efficacy and morality of all laws are worth debating, but that’s different from legality.

Also, why wasn’t there a national debate on these laws while Biden, Obama, Bush, or Clinton were president? Why now? That they are becoming scandalous NOW despite being barely noticed in prior administrations is a testament to the legacy media’s political bias. It's argued that a rogue President is engaging in an unlawful power grab, but that’s simply false.

These laws existed prior to Trump. These laws were enforced prior to Trump. These powers were democratically granted to the executive branch by Congress. If you don’t like them, fine, petition Congress to change the law, but don’t falsely claim the President is acting unlawfully.


Link


Home Front: Politix
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Cleans House: Fires All Pentagon Advisory Committees, Including Seat Held by Obama Crony Susan Rice
2025-04-26
[GatewayPundit] Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has formally terminated the service of every member sitting on the Department of Defense’s advisory committees.

Based on the information available on the website as of Thursday, the now-defunct panels included several well-known Democrats and Bush-era Republicans.

  • Janine Davidson (Chair) – Former Under Secretary of the Navy under Obama. A staunch Democrat and longtime proponent of Obama-era military reforms, now steering Pentagon policy advice.

  • Michèle Flournoy – Held major Pentagon roles under Clinton and Obama; often discussed as a potential Secretary of Defense under Hillary Clinton or Biden.

  • Colin Kahl – National Security Advisor to then-VP Biden, later Under Secretary of Defense for Policy under Biden. Key Biden ally and architect of many failed Middle East strategies during the Obama years.

  • Susan Rice – National Security Advisor under Obama; Domestic Policy Advisor under Biden. Central to Obama’s foreign policy blunders and later helped craft Biden’s radical domestic agenda.

  • Dana Shell Smith – Career diplomat; served as U.S. Ambassador to Qatar under Obama.

  • Eric Edelman – Undersecretary of Defense for Policy under George W. Bush; strong neoconservative background.

  • Jon Huntsman Jr. – Served under George W. Bush (Ambassador to Singapore) and Obama (Ambassador to China); briefly served under Trump (Ambassador to Russia).

  • Kori Schake – Held roles under Bush; associated with AEI and other think tanks; known for hawkish, internationalist views.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More