Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

-PC Follies
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Behind ‘Anti-Racist' Math Push
2021-02-19
[Free Beacon] Liberal education collective claims asking students to show work is racist.

A radical new push to purge math curricula of allegedly racist practices like showing your work and finding the correct answer is bankrolled by one of the nation's most prominent nonprofits: the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

The Gates Foundation is the only donor mentioned on the homepage of A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction, a group of 25 education organizations whose curriculum states that asking students to show their work and find the right answer is an inherently racist practice.

Over the past decade, the Gates Foundation has given upward of $140 million to some of the groups behind Pathway, whose antiracist resources are the basis for a new teacher training course offered by the Oregon Department of Education.

The Education Trust, a California-based group that promoted the September release of Pathway's antiracist "toolkit," has received $86 million from the Gates Foundation, including a $3.6 million grant awarded in June.

Teach Plus, another group dedicated to creating an antiracist culture in K-12 schools, has received more than $27 million from the Gates Foundation. The group's board members include former Democratic congressman George Miller and Obama-era secretary of education John King Jr.—who is also the president of The Education Trust.
Link


Economy
Liberals call for $10.10 minimum wage - more than Obama requested
2013-03-02
[THEHILL] The White House is coming under pressure from liberal Democrats in the House and Senate to press for a minimum wage hike as high as $10.10.
Pikers! Go ahead and make it $20!
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) argues President Obama "missed the mark" in calling to raise the minimum wage to $9 in his State of the Union address, and his staff met with White House staff last week to argue for a higher number.
Wotta cheapskate.
The veteran senator, who will retire at the end of this Congress, is working with Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) on legislation that would raise the minimum wage to $10.10 over three years and then index future increases to inflation.
That'd be the snake of cause and effect gnawing at its own tail.
"Well, we're going to introduce our own bill on it," Harkin told The Hill on Tuesday. "I'm going to be in discussions with them because I think they missed the mark, but people make mistakes."
"What's a few bucks here and there? It's only money!"
Besides Harkin and Miller -- a confidant of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) -- Democrats backing a higher minimum wage hike include Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.) and Rep. Charles Rangel (N.Y.).
Link


-Lurid Crime Tales-
Sleaze Squeeze play for Chollie
2010-07-28
More on the Troubles of Being Chollie ...
WASHINGTON -- One of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's top lieutenants demanded yesterday that Rep. Charles Rangel quickly settle the swirling ethics charges against him rather than face a trial tomorrow that could embarrass Democratic candidates across the country -- but the disgraced pol isn't going without a fight.

"I think it's best that he settle," Rep. George Miller, an influential California Democrat who helped engineer Pelosi's rise to power, told The Post.

"Because I just said so, that's why. That's my feeling," he added.

Amid mounting pressure on Rangel, Miller's blunt statement is the most direct message from any member of Pelosi's inner circle, and comes just a day after Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) -- another member of her leadership team -- met with Rangel to talk about the charges he's facing.

Van Hollen heads the campaign arm charged with getting enough House Democrats re-elected to keep their majority -- a task that grows harder as the Rangel affair draws voters' focus to scandal instead of the party's own agenda.
Sure, Mr. and Ms. Hot-Shot Donors, please contribute to the party of Chollie Rangel. You can be sure your investment will pay off!
For any plea bargain to be accepted by the bipartisan House Ethics Committee, which is bringing charges against the 80-year-old Rangel, he would have to swallow a bitter pill -- admitting to multiple, substantial ethics violations, sources said.
In the end it'll still be a 1:10 ratio of confessions to transgressions. At best.
Rangel confirmed yesterday that his high-priced team of lawyers is in talks with the committee's legal staff. "They are talking," Rangel told ABC News. "I hope people are doing what is in the best interest of justice, equity and fairness."

"I want what's the fair and right thing to do, and I have confidence in my lawyers and the lawyers of the Ethics Committee," Rangel said.

"It's lawyer to lawyer," a Rangel aide confirmed.

The chairwoman of the Ethics Committee, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), said that in past plea bargains, the panel's members have always accepted the recommendations of their lawyers.
And the lawyers always accept the recommendations of the House leadership, if you know what I mean ...
"I think he's going to go through the [trial] process," one Democratic lawmaker, who is close to Rangel and has held private conversations with him about it, told The Post. "We're all entitled to our defense."

But, the lawmaker added, "I wouldn't want to be in his shoes."

Such negotiations are common during the culmination of an investigation, and often intensify as the deadline approaches.

Rangel also has been spotted talking this week with Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), the No. 3 House Democrat and a fellow member of the Congressional Black Caucus, which is pushing for Rangel to get a fair process.
Chollie don't want fair, Chollie wants all this to go away ...
Even with a deal, the ethics panel would still have to make public the charges against Rangel along with a report on its investigation, which could contain embarrassing revelations. He's been probed for his corporate solicitations on behalf a center named after him at CCNY; having four rent-controlled apartments; failure to report $60,000 of income on required financial-disclosure reports; and skirting of income taxes on his villa in the Dominican Republic.
Don't count on the report being made public. They'll find a way to get Chollie off, and then they'll find a way to keep it all, or at least the worst of it, quiet. That's what the lawyers are discussing ...
But the exact sanctions with which Rangel might get slapped would be on the table in talks.

"I think he ought to have a chance to defend himself," said Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY). "I stand for that very strongly."
Link


Home Front: Politix
Obama letter stalls war funding
2010-06-17
As if the Gulf weren't enough, the White House now faces a spill of its own making in Congress this week, infuriating old Democratic allies and putting a hold on new war funding sought by President Barack Obama.

Talks were under way Tuesday to extricate the administration by coming up with offsets to pay for new education assistance to avert teacher layoffs this fall. At the same time, renewed efforts began to salvage a $24 billion package of state Medicaid assistance, even if it means paring back a proposed 18-month fix of Medicare reimbursements for physicians.

The backdrop in both cases is a Saturday night letter from Obama calling for action on education and Medicaid assistance but giving no direction on how to pay for them -- or how to win support in a deficit-conscious Congress. Leaked in advance to the Sunday newspapers, the letter caught party leaders by surprise, and with Obama largely absent from both fights to date, it was widely seen by Democrats as more political showmanship at their expense by the administration.

Clearly annoyed, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called White House congressional liaison Phil Schiliro to her office Monday, and House Appropriations Committee Chairman Dave Obey served notice that he would withhold action on Obama's new war funding until the dust clears on domestic spending issues.

"It was a good and constructive meeting," Schiliro said of his session with Pelosi. But the speaker's good friend, House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.) bluntly accused the White House of looking for political cover now, having come late to the fight of averting what many think will be a wave of public employee layoffs as state budget cuts hit home before November's elections.

"So what is this, 'We asked Congress to do this in June'?" Miller said to POLITICO, referring to the Obama letter. "Well, we asked them to do it in December."

Obey has been central to the fight over education aid and, in an interview, drew a direct link between war funding and progress on domestic priorities.

He said he would withhold action on the war funds until there was some resolution on a major economic relief bill extending jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed and popular tax breaks for individuals and businesses.

It's this package, now pending in the Senate, that carries the $24 billion for Medicaid. And going into test votes Wednesday, Democrats are still short of the 60 votes needed to cut off debate.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Obama's health care pitch to Democrats: Trust me
2010-03-07
WASHINGTON (AP) - In private pitches to Democrats, President Barack Obama says he will persuade Congress to pass his health care overhaul even if it kills him and even if he has to ask deeply distrustful lawmakers to trust him on a promise the White House doesn't have the power to keep.

That, in a sometimes darkly joking way, is what the president is telling Democratic House members as he begins an all-out push to coax Congress into passing his proposals despite voters' misgivings and Republicans' dire warnings.

"He made the case, 'Listen, we put in a very hard year working on health care reform and the time for action is now,'" said Rep. Ron Kind, D-Wis., one of several Democrats who met with Obama at the White House on Thursday.

Obama joked that the political battle has contributed to the recent rise in his cholesterol, Kind said, and the president noted how ironic it would be if health care drove him to his grave.
Tempting. But I'm still against it...
But Obama is anything but sickly these days, making health care pitches Monday in Philadelphia and Wednesday in St. Louis, and instructing aides to address every question or concern Democratic lawmakers possibly can raise.

Some answers, however, rely more on faith than fact. Confronting party unrest on his left and right, Obama is calling for political courage, citing historic opportunities and essentially saying "trust me" in areas inherently murky, uncertain and out of his control. The process for getting health care legislation through Congress is tough enough already, and Republicans are determined to derail it.

Obama told House liberals last week that he understands their frustration in seeing priorities _ such as allowing the government to sell insurance in competition with private companies _ dropped from the revised legislation. He promised to work with them in the future to improve health care laws, said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., who leads the Congressional Black Caucus.

"He said, `This is the first step, a foundation that we can build upon,'" she said. "He made a commitment to work with us on all the issues that are outstanding, and there are many."

It's unclear whether Obama can keep such promises, especially with Republicans expecting to gain House and Senate seats this fall.

Obama is asking his party's House moderates to have a different kind of faith. The party's strategy calls for House Democrats, despite many misgivings, to go along with a health care bill the Senate passed in December. Obama would sign it into law, but senators would promise to make numerous changes demanded by House Democrats. Because Senate Democrats no longer have the numbers to stop GOP filibusters, the changes would have to be made under rules that require only simple majority votes.

Republicans are playing on House Democrats' suspicions of their Senate colleagues, saying Senate Democrats may not keep their end of the bargain. The taunts often hit their marks.

"A big issue for the House is putting suspenders with belts on the plan to ensure we don't get left holding the bag with just the Senate bill by itself," said Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn.

Democratic leaders are considering several ways to reassure nervous House members, who felt burned last year when they voted for climate legislation _ a vote many now regret _ and the Senate never did its part. Possibilities include a letter pledging compliance, signed by 51 or more Senate Democrats, or a parliamentary move that essentially would suspend the House-passed bill until the follow-up Senate action takes place.

Congressional insiders say the likeliest path involves Obama and others convincing House members that Democrats, who control 59 of the Senate's 100 seats, have more than enough votes for a simple majority, especially when Vice President Joe Biden can break a tie.

Even if the House does its part, Republican senators promise to use every tool they can to kill the Senate's follow-up actions with delaying tactics, such as introducing unending streams of amendments. Democrats say they believe they can grind down efforts over time, leaving Republicans exhausted and perhaps vulnerable to renewed accusations of obstructionism.

A bigger worry for Democrats is that a dispute over abortion restrictions could cause as many as a dozen House Democrats to switch to "no" on health care even though they voted "yes" last year. If that happens, Obama and other party leaders will press some of the 39 House Democrats who voted "no" last year to switch sides. Such a switch can be defended politically, party leaders say, because the revised bill is less costly and excludes the contentious public insurance option

Republicans are working overtime to thwart such strategies by sowing doubts and fears among Democrats. They say Obama is marching his party toward political suicide in a year when he's not on the ballot.

GOP Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said the president and House Democratic leaders are asking their colleagues to "hold hands, jump off a cliff and hope Harry Reid catches them," a reference to the Senate Democratic leader from Nevada.

Even if the Senate keeps it promise to make changes that the House wants, Alexander said, Republicans will try to repeal the legislation and make it a campaign issue in every race this fall.

White House and Democratic leaders counter with their own warnings to nervous House Democrats who might consider switching from "yes" to "no" on health care. Why would Republicans, they ask, shout warnings if they truly believed Democrats were blundering their way to catastrophe?

They also say Republican challengers will heap even more scorn on a vote-switcher, reviving versions of the flip-flopping taunt used against 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry: "He was for it before he was against it."

It's better, these party leaders say, to pass the health care bill and spend the last few months of the 2010 campaign telling voters about the ways it will help them.

"You've got to go out and sell that product and stop worrying about the process," said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee. "And the president is a very powerful salesman for that product."
Link


Home Front: Politix
Rangel Replacement is Pelosi in Drag - Bring Back Rangel Campaign Starts Soon.
2010-03-03
California Rep. Pete Stark will temporarily seize the gavel of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, succeeding Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., who stepped aside because of an ethics probe, Fox News learned Wednesday.

House and Democratic caucus rules assert that when a chairman steps aside, the next senior lawmaker on that committee should assume the chairmanship.

Senior House sources familiar with the situation signal that Stark will take the gavel in Rangel's absence, but the House Democratic caucus could alter that decision and trump the traditional line-of-succession.

Rangel stepped aside Wednesday morning until the ethics committee finishes investigating him on a slate of probes, ranging from his failure to pay taxes to his use of rent-controlled apartments in Harlem for political purposes.

Known for a sometimes-volcanic temper, many Democrats fretted privately that Stark is too volatile to lead such an important committee.

In a famous 2007 incident on the House floor, Stark accused President Bush of sending troops to Iraq"to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement."

He also once called former Colorado Republican Rep. Scott McInnis a "fruitcake."

Rep. Mike Honda, D-Calif., represents a district that borders Stark's in northern California. Honda described his California colleague as "passionate."

"He doesn't back off from a verbal fight," said Honda. "He's a man of his word."

Even as Rangel resigns temporarily because of the ethics probe, the same panel just exonerated Stark in a smaller-scale investigation it conducted into a tax exemption he received for a piece of property in Maryland.

The Committee on Standards of Official Conduct cleared Stark of any wrongdoing in January.
Some insiders speculated that appointing Stark could pose a problem for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Not only is Pelosi from California, but four other Californians already chair major House committees. Rep. Howard Berman leads the Foreign Affairs Committee. Rep. Henry Waxman heads the Energy and Commerce Committee. Rep. George Miller chairs the Education and Labor Committee. And Rep. Zoe Lofgren sits atop the ethics committee.

With the installation of Stark on a temporary basis, Pelosi now has three Californians chairing the three committees with jurisdiction over health care reform: Waxman, Miller and Stark.

Some members of the Congressional Black Caucus were lobbying for Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., a senior Ways and Means member and a civil rights era legend, to succeed Rangel.

It's unclear if the temporary appointment of Stark in lieu of Lewis could be the source of tension between Democratic leaders and the CBC.

But Lewis downplayed those concerns.

"We have seniority," Lewis said. "I don't think it's right for people to be jumping over one another."

Another named mentioned privately for the job was Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass. Many lawmakers say that Neal is the one of the best-qualified members to lead the panel, with a granular understanding of the tax code.
Link


Economy
Class Warfare's Next Target: 401(k) Savings
2010-02-19
You did the responsible thing. You saved in your IRA or 401(k) to support your retirement, when you could have spent that money on another vacation, or an upscale car, or fancier clothes and jewelry. But now Washington is developing plans for your retirement savings.

BusinessWeek reports that the Treasury and Labor departments are asking for public comment on "the conversion of 401(k) savings and Individual Retirement Accounts into annuities or other steady payment streams."

In plain English, the idea is for the government to take your retirement savings in return for a promise to pay you some monthly benefit in your retirement years.
That would be the point at which we'd see barricades in the streets ...
They will tell you that you are "investing" your money in U.S. Treasury bonds. But they will use your money immediately to pay for their unprecedented trillion-dollar budget deficits, leaving nothing to back up their political promises, just as they have raided the Social Security trust funds.

This "conversion" may start out as an optional choice, though you are already free to buy Treasury bonds whenever you want. But as Karl Denninger of the Market Ticker Web site reports: "'Choices' have a funny way of turning into mandates, and this looks to me like a raw admission that Treasury knows it will not be able to sell its debt in the open market -- so they will effectively tax you by forcing your 'retirement' money to buy them."
Argentina did this a year back. A lot of good it did, too, though the Kirchners enjoyed spending the boodle ...
Moreover, benefits based on Treasury bond interest rates may be woefully inadequate compensation for your years of savings. As Denninger adds, "What's even worse is that the government has intentionally suppressed Treasury yields during this crisis (and will keep doing so by various means, including manipulating the CPI inflation index) so as to guarantee that you lose over time compared to actual purchasing power."

This proposal follows hearings held last fall by House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-Calif., and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Soviet Wash., of the Ways and Means Committee focusing on "redirecting (IRA and 401k) tax breaks to a new system of guaranteed retirement accounts to which all workers would be obliged to contribute," as reported by InvestmentNews.com.
Obliged as in mandated, as in the pols take your 401k ...
The hearings examined a proposal from professor Teresa Ghilarducci of the New School for Social Research in New York to give all workers "a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government" in return for requiring workers "to invest 5% of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration."
Link


Home Front: WoT
PM urges US to take steps for Dr Aafia's release
2009-11-12
[Geo News] Pakistan on Wednesday asked the United States to take it into confidence on its Afghan policy and ensure that a military buildup in Afghanistan does not have any "effect" on Balochistan and other areas. Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani, talking to a US Congressional delegation led by Johan Tierney at the PM House, also asked the US and ISAF forces to enhance intelligence sharing with Pakistan to solidify the ongoing operation against militancy on the Pak Afghan border.

Gilani asked the United States to take Pakistan into confidence on the new Afghan policy, under review by the US administration.

He said it was crucial to "sanitize" the Pak Afghan border to prevent the flow of weapons, drugs, illicit money and militants.

Gilani said Pakistan considered Afghanistan's stability vital for its own and was looking forward towards continued cooperation with the new Karzai government.

He said the United States should channelize its economic assistance through a transparent mechanism established by Pakistan.

In this regard, he mentioned the Trust Fund established for Malakand, Higher Education Commission, National Commission for Human Development and Benazir Income Support Programme for the socio economic development, education and reconstruction in the militancy affected areas of Pakistan, that can be used for this purpose.

Underlining the importance of revival of Pakistan's economy, he said the US should play leading role by providing enhanced market access to Pakistani products as well as encouraging investment in Pakistan's diverse economic sectors at this critical juncture of history.

On successful operation against terrorists in which Pakistan armed forces, Frontier Corps, Frontier Constabulary and Police made huge sacrifices, the Prime Minister emphasized that much needed equipment for capacity building should immediately be supplied to Pakistan in order to take the ongoing operation to its logical conclusion.

Prime Minister Gilani reaffirmed the government's resolve to seek resolution of all the disputes with India through resumption of composite dialogue particularly the festering Kashmir dispute and water issues.

He hoped that the US and international community would play their role to bring lasting peace to South Asia.

The Prime Minister also suggested that US should take steps like release of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, extension of Fulbright scholarship programme for Pakistani students beyond 2010 and special allocation of 500 scholarships for the children of martyred and injured in operations against the terrorists in order to create goodwill.

Congressmen John Tierney expressed his deep appreciation of the commitment of Pakistan government against terrorism by acknowledging the fact that these evil forces cannot be defeated without Pakistan's proactive role.

He lauded the sacrifices of Pakistan armed forces and law enforcement agencies and condoled with their families as well as with the families of innocent citizens who laid their lives in their country's pursuit to defeat terrorism.

John Tierney and other Congressmen assured the Prime Minister that they, through the US Congress, would fully support provision of assistance to Pakistan in education, health sectors as well as for capacity building of its armed forces and law enforcement agencies.

They appreciated the proposal for extension of Fullbright scholarship programme and provision of scholarship to the children of the effected families and promised to play a role towards this end.

They apprised the Prime Minister that US House of Representative had already passed ROZ Bill alongwith Kerry Lugar legislation and promised to move in coordination with the US Senate to provide much awaited financial support for creating employment and business opportunities in the tribal areas of Pakistan.

Other members of the delegation included George Miller, Peter Welch and Ron Kind. US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne W. Patterson attended the meeting.

Minister for Defence Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar, Minister for Interior Rehman Malik, State Minister for Finance Hina Rabbani Khar, Senator Syeda Sughra Imam and other senior government officials were also present.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Analysis of the House ACORN vote - You will be surprised, shocked and amazed
2009-09-18
The House’s 345-75 vote to defund ACORN is indeed, as my Examiner colleague Byron York put it, extraordinary. Democrats voted 172-75 to defund ACORN; Republicans voted 173-0 to do so. This would not have occurred but for http://biggovernment.com/ the Big Government videos of ACORN employees encouraging tax evasion and prostitution. "Mainstream media" studiously ignored this big, big story, because it put Obama's political allies in ACORN in a bad light--such an egregious bit of biased coverage that it aroused derision and contempt from Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. But "mainstream media" couldn't cover up this scandal, as much as it wanted to. And once it was out in the open, the House Democratic leadership obviously decided it was riskier to block a vote and to deny many of their members a chance to cast an anti-ACORN vote than it was distasteful to collude in the defunding of an important part of the coalition that did so much to elect Barack Obama and the Democratic majorities in 2008.

Which leads to the question: who were the 75 House Democrats who voted not to defund ACORN? They included Majority Whip James Clyburn but not Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as is customary for speakers did not vote, but her Bay Area consiglieri George Miller and Anna Eshoo voted to defund the group. The 75 anti-defunding Democrats included several committee chairmen—Bob Filner, Nick Joe Rahall, Charles Rangel, Louise Slaughter, Bennie Thompson, Edolphus Towns and Henry Waxman—but not others. Chairmen Howard Berman, John Conyers, Bart Gordon, George Miller, James Oberstar, David Obey, Collin Peterson, Ike Skelton and John Spratt all voted to defund ACORN; Chairman Barney Frank was one of 11 members not voting (2 others voted present). Interestingly, Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers indicated earlier this year that his committee might investigate ACORN; then he changed his mind at the behest, he said, of “the powers that be.” Perhaps he will change his mind again, now that “the powers that be” have allowed ACORN to be repudiated.

The 75 districts represented by members who voted against defunding ACORN delivered an average majority of 72%-26% for Barack Obama. Only two of those districts, represented by West Virginia Democrats Alan Mollohan and Nick Joe Rahall, voted for John McCain. By my count, 29 of those districts are represented by members of the Congressional Black Caucus and 7 districts by members of the Hispanic Caucus. The 11 districts of those not voting averaged 54%-45% for Obama and the 2 districts of those voting present averaged 77%-23% for Obama. By my calculation, that means the average vote in the districts of the 345 members who voted to defund ACORN was about 50%-48% for McCain. As indicated by members' votes, mainstream America was clearly repulsed by the facts that "mainstream media" tried to conceal.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Government care is an oxymoron
2009-06-12
by Kevin O'Brien

The team is assembled and scrubbed and the patient is on the table. If all goes well, we will witness a triumph of modern politics over modern medicine.

We really should hope that it goes very poorly, indeed. Only then will we retain both a very good health care system and the chance to make it better.

The surgery that Drs. Kennedy, Waxman, Miller, Rangel and Chief of Government-Run Medicine Barack Obama propose has been done in socialist countries all over the world. Here, though, it's considered experimental. And the experiment will "work" here only if the desired results are fairness, in the sense of a broad equality of misery, and a colossal increase in the power of government over the individual.

If the desired results are freedom of choice, timely access to care, high quality of care, flexibility, innovation -- the things the vast majority of Americans enjoy today -- plus any chance at reducing cost and bureaucracy, the proposals the Democratic surgical team is pushing are exactly the wrong things to do. And all of them -- President Barack Obama, Sen. Edward Kennedy and Reps. Henry Waxman, George Miller and Charles Rangel -- know it.

Four congressional committees are mobilizing to yank health care out of the private sector and finish the job of making medicine a government enterprise. You know, like a bank or a car company.

The "single-payer" people, who have clamored for years in favor of a straight government takeover of the entire health insurance system, are upset because Obama no longer publicly agrees with them. They needn't worry -- and the savvy ones aren't worried, because they recognize a useful smoke screen when they see one.

Obama and the framers of the House's legislation propose a "public health insurance option" to compete with (Democratic subliminal message alert) EVIL, FILTHY, NASTY, AWFUL, MEAN, GREEDY, HORRIBLE private health insurers. Kennedy favors the "government option," too, but apparently hasn't included it, yet, in the bill he is writing.

The government option is the end of the health care system we know today. It's single-payer in two easy steps, rather than one politically difficult one.

When government competes directly with the private sector, government wins -- as all auto companies that are not General Motors are about to find out -- because government is not only playing the game but making the rules.

In a letter intended to push Kennedy and a reluctant Sen. Max Baucus, head of the Senate Finance Committee, toward the government option, Obama expressed a "core belief that Americans should have better choices for health insurance, building on the principle that if they like the coverage they have now, they can keep it."

Even the most ardent single-payer advocate can afford such a core belief, knowing that the key words are "if they like the coverage they have now," and that once government is in the game, it can easily make it impossible for private companies to offer coverage that Americans and their employers like.

Read Obama's letter, which lays out the health care program he expects Congress to place on his desk for signature this fall. The numbers don't come close to adding up and elements of the program contradict one another. For example, how would covering more people and doing more preventive care -- that's treating more people more often -- cut costs? We're a lot more likely to see costs cut by denial of Jane's hip replacement or Joe's prostate cancer surgery. It will be cheaper for Jane to limp, and Joe to die.

The most tragic thing about the enormous changes the Democrats propose -- and the reason why Obama and his congressional allies are bent on rushing them through as fast as they can -- is that once private-sector health care is gone, there will be no bringing it back.

The question on the table is not whether Americans have legitimate gripes about their medical system -- we do. The question is whether we think it's in such terrible shape that even the government could do a better job with it. That's what any plan that includes a government "option" is really asking. The right answer, clearly, is a resounding "no."

Let Congress hear it, over and over.
Link


-Short Attention Span Theater-
US lab debuts super laser
2009-05-31
A US weapons lab on Friday pulled back the curtain on a super laser with the power to burn as hot as a star.
For peaceful purposes, of course.
The National Ignition Facility's main purpose is to serve as a tool for gauging the reliability and safety of the US nuclear weapons arsenal but scientists say it could deliver breakthroughs in safe fusion power.

"We have invented the world's largest laser system," actor-turned-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said during a dedication ceremony attended by thousands including state and national officials. "We can create the stars right here on earth. And I can see already my friends in Hollywood being very upset that their stuff that they show on the big screen is obsolete. We have the real stuff right here."

NIF is touted as the world's highest-energy laser system. It is located inside the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory about an hour's drive from San Francisco.

Equipment connected to a house-sized sphere can focus 192 laser beams on a small point, generating temperatures and pressures that exist at cores of stars or giant planets.
A small point? Like Kimmie's brain?
NIF will be able to create conditions and conduct experiments never before possible on Earth, according to the laboratory. A fusion reaction triggered by the super laser hitting hydrogen atoms will produce more energy than was required to prompt "ignition," according to NIF director Edward Moses.

"This is the long-sought goal of 'energy gain' that has been the goal of fusion researchers for more than half a century," Moses said. "NIF's success will be a scientific breakthrough of historic significance; the first demonstration of fusion ignition in a laboratory setting, duplicating on Earth the processes that power the stars."

Construction of the NIF began in 1997, funded by the US Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). "NIF, a cornerstone of the National Nuclear Security Administration's effort to maintain our nuclear deterrent without nuclear testing, will play a vital role in reshaping national security in the 21st century," said NNSA administrator Tom D'Agostino.
Hopefully he was referring to Iran's national security.
"This one-of-a-kind facility is the only place in the world that is capable of providing some of the most critical technical means to safely maintain the viability of the nation's nuclear stockpile."

Scientists say that NIF also promises groundbreaking discoveries in planetary science and astrophysics by recreating conditions that exist in supernovas, black holes, and in the cores of giant planets.

Electricity derived from fusion reactions similar to what takes place in the sun could help sate humanity's growing appetite for green energy, according to lab officials. "Very shortly we will engage in what many believe to be this nation's greatest challenge thus far, one that confronts not only the nation but all of mankind -- energy independence," said lab director George Miller.
Obviously they are ignoring fantastical stuff like digging the US out of its national debt or figuring out why people who otherwise look normal will vote for the likes of Obama.
The lab was founded in 1952 and describes itself as a research institution for science and technology applied to national security.

"This laser system is an incredible success not just for California, but for our country and our world," Schwarzenegger said. "NIF has the potential to revolutionize our energy system, teaching us a new way to harness the energy of the sun to power our cars and homes."
Link


Home Front: Politix
Hoyer MIA in Helping Murtha
2008-11-03
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) is turning a blind eye to his one-time rival Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), even as the veteran lawmaker appeals for help in what’s become the political fight of his career.

In recent days, Murtha has been turning to his fellow lawmakers for money, and many have answered the call — flooding his coffers with more than $130,000 in past few days.

But Hoyer, who dueled with Murtha two years ago for the Majority Leader post, has not. That makes him the only elected member of House Democratic leadership yet to contribute to the Pennsylvania Democrat’s suddenly tight re-election battle.

Hoyer and Murtha’s bitter contest in 2006 divided the Caucus and prompted then Speaker-designate Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to weigh in on behalf of Murtha, her longtime ally. Hoyer won the race by 63 votes in what Pelosi at the time acknowledged was a “stunning victory.” But tensions between Hoyer and Murtha have lingered.

Now, Murtha is facing a surprisingly tough re-election challenge from Republican candidate William Russell. The vocal Iraq War critic was expected to coast to his 19th term but complicated that task recently when he referred to his own constituents as racists and rednecks.

To fund a last-minute blitz aimed at saving his seat, Murtha’s campaign is hitting up every possible source of funds, with appeals to liberal activists, defense industry lobbyists — and fellow lawmakers.

Pelosi, Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), and Caucus Vice Chairman John Larson (Conn.) have ponied up $7,000 each — $2,000 from their respective re-election accounts and $5,000 from their political action committees. Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) cut a check for $2,000 from his re-election account.

Murtha also picked up another $9,300 combined from Reps. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.) and George Miller (Calif.), co-chairs of the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee.

Meanwhile, fellow members of the Appropriations Committee, on which Murtha chairs the Subcommittee on Defense, have kicked in more than $37,000 this week. His Keystone State colleagues contributed another $12,000. And Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), whom Murtha backed in the presidential primary, forked over $5,000 from her leadership PAC.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More