Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Irans Shifting Strategy |
2008-05-15 |
This goes with the article just below -- Pity Lebanons Shia Community By NIBRAS KAZIMI May 12, 2008 The healing in Iraq and the deterioration in Lebanon are not unrelated. In fact, Iraq will serve as both cause and effect to Lebanons misfortunes. Iran, eclipsed in Sadr City, had decided to allow its sectarian acolytes to put on a show of strength in Beirut. And the jihadists of Al Qaedas ilk, soon to be eclipsed in Mosul, will migrate to Beirut to meet Irans challenge. Five years ago, there was a hope that held Iraq as a would-be beacon for democracy throughout the Middle East, but that vision had too many determined enemies both inside and outside Iraq. Yet as the situation there darkened through the actions of these regressive forces, the spontaneous outpouring of liberty demonstrated by the Lebanese people seemed to validate the notion that democracy and liberty would take in the region, and that the hope for what Iraq may portend was not misplaced. But the Cedar Revolution, as the March 2005 events of Beirut are remembered, also had too many internal and external enemies determined to spoil the elation. Two countries that were dead-set against Iraq succeeding were Syria and Iran. These are also the two countries most responsible for fomenting political paralysis and chaos in Lebanon. In Iraq, the Iranians and the Syrians began a joint-partnership aimed at harnessing the disruptive energies of the Mahdi Army as a weapon by which to retaliate against America should either of them get attacked, as well as acting as a force keeping Iraq in a state of permanent disorder. Syrias influence on the Sadrist movement from which the Mahdi Army springs is often overlooked: Damascus was a refuge for many prominent Sadrists during the latter years of Saddam Husseins tyranny, and the Syrian Baathists brokered the initial rapprochement between the Sadrist old guard and Iran. Many of these Sadrist apparatchiks were openly hostile to the Iranians and Irans preferred acolytes in Iraq such as the Hakim family, long-standing rivals of the Muqtada al-Sadrs father, the man who founded the Sadrist movement. Actually, many of them continue secretly to believe that Saddams regime had nothing to do with their leaders murder in early 1999 and lay the blame solely on the Hakims and Iran. However, after the first major confrontation between the Sadrists and American troops in the spring of 2004, the Iranians saw potential in Sadrs thugs at around the same time as they were becoming increasingly disappointed with the Badr Corps, the Iranian-trained militia under the leadership of the Hakim family. The Hakims had become too invested in, and integrated within, the Iraqi state their revenues from contracts and trade earned inside Iraq exceeded the overall budget of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, which had funded them previously and could not be counted on to act as Irans agents of disorder. Whereas the Hakim turned independent as they didnt need Iran anymore, the Sadrists were desperate for arms and training, and Iran was more than willing to accommodate them with the Syrians acting as go-betweens. It was in this vein that the first batch of Iranian-administered training was supposed to take place in Damascus during November 2004. It was geared towards turning ten of the top Mahdi Army field commanders into the security chiefs of a parallel intelligence agency working on behalf of the Iranians. The seminar did not take place on time, and it is unclear whether it ever subsequently took place in Damascus. But other training, on security matters and terrorism, did take place in a camp near Tehran, according to captured Mahdi Army commanders in Iraq, and it was administered by instructors from Lebanese Hezbollah. It should also be noted that the political channel through which the Syrian leadership maintains its relationship with Hezbollah primarily through General Muhammad Nassif, ostensibly the Syrian prime ministers deputy on security matters is the very same channel through which the Syrians communicate with the Sadrists. Thus, the Iranians and the Syrians were hoping to turn the rag-tag elements of the Mahdi Army into an Iraqi version of Hezbollah, with both a political wing represented by Mr. Sadr and a military wing that they called the majamee alkhasa, or Special Groups, a name chosen in Tehran and not a technical term invented by American commanders as so many Iraq-watchers seem to think. And boy, was that a mistake: the Mahdi Army as a whole and the Special Groups in particular have collapsed after seven weeks of fighting against a confident and capable Iraqi Army that was bolstered by American air cover and logistical support. On Thursday, the Sadrists effectively offered their surrender to Prime Minister Maliki, who had earlier put them on notice that he would smash into their redoubts, especially Baghdads slum of Sadr City, if they continued to act as saboteurs. Mr. Maliki was prepared to go all the away, including displacing hundreds of thousands of refugees from Sadr City and arresting Sadrist parliamentarians. Iran had lost and the leaders in Tehran needed to save face fast. Iran needed to show that it could create mischief around the region for that has always been one of Tehrans strategic strengths. That is why they pushed Hezbollah to overreact when given a juicy provocation by the American-backed cabinet of Fouad al-Siniora. The Lebanese government has done and said many provocative things in the past but Hezbollah chose this particular provocation to throw a theatric and violent tantrum. The situation in Lebanon is immensely complex and there are too many factors to list as to why it had been so messy, yet it was a manageable mess that never seemed to boil over that is, until Hezbollah decided to rampage through Beirut and humiliate the Siniora government and the March 14 coalition that supports it; showing them up as weak and feckless, and in turn embarrassing America and Saudi Arabia for being unable to do anything to help their allies. This was no coup or deft move aimed at breaking the political stalemate: Iran was simply flexing its muscles in Beirut through Hezbollah because Irans other pawns were shown-up as feckless and weak in Sadr City. That too was a major mistake. The Iranians and the Syrians may have concluded that they have passed the worst of the Sunni-Shia tensions that were roiling the Middle East over the last couple of years. In particular, the ruling Alawites of Syria, a Shia-offshoot minority, were worried about internal fall-out should the majority Sunni Syrians get exposed to headlines blaring sectarians strife in Lebanon next door. However, recent polling from the Middle East seemed to indicate that being virulently anti-American and anti-Israeli was enough to offset the stigma of being a Shia or an Alawite among Sunni audiences, and this may have emboldened the Syrians to go along with Irans plan. But there was no escaping the potent imagery of armed Shia gangsters, under orders from Hezbollah and its affiliates, seemingly emasculating Beiruts Sunnis and wounding their pride, especially given the rising sectarian temperatures in Lebanon that had never abated. Suddenly, the Sunnis of Lebanon felt exposed and no longer able to trust their established communal leaders, such as the Hariri family, to protect them. That is why they may look elsewhere for muscle, and thats why jihadist internet forums have lighted up with giddy expectations of taking the jihad against the Shias from the streets of Baghdad to the streets of Beirut. Mr. Maliki has just ordered the launch of a much-anticipated military campaign to rid Mosul, Iraqs third largest city, of whatever significant vestige of Al Qaedas remaining in Iraq. The inevitable jihadist collapse there will push more and more jihadists to re-establish their efforts elsewhere, and nowhere looks more promising than Lebanon. Mr. Kazimi is a contributing editor to The New York Sun. |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Pro-Syrian Lebanese shrugs off Bush travel ban |
2007-07-01 |
A pro-Syrian Lebanese politician on Saturday shrugged off a US travel ban, referring to it sarcastically as a precious gift that showed the Lebanese government was a tool in Washingtons hand. President George W Bush on Friday banned 10 Syrian officials and Lebanese politicians, whom Washington accuses of undermining Prime Minister Fouad al-Siniora, from entering the United States. The list of Syrian officials includes Assef Shawkat, director of military intelligence and brother-in-law of President Bashar al-Assad, Hisham Ikhtiyar, an Assad adviser, Brigadier General Rustom Ghazali, former head of Syrian intelligence in Lebanon, and his assistant Brigadier General Jamaa Jamaa. The list includes six pro-Syrian Lebanese politicians five former cabinet ministers and a former member of parliament. Lebanese ex-MP Nasser Qandil, one of the six, said he would send a cable to Bush thanking him for his decision which he sees as a precious gift that shows the true nature of the political conflict in Lebanon. The Lebanese are confronting the American policies and the (Lebanese) government is nothing but a tool of the American plan, Qandils office said in a statement. Qandil said the ban also exposed Bushs calls for promoting freedom of speech and democracy as fraudulent. He said he was considering legal steps against the US president. The US move followed repeated calls for Damascus to stop fomenting instability in Lebanon, where Washington is trying to shore up the elected government of the embattled Siniora. The Lebanese opposition, led by the pro-Syrian Hezbollah group, has been demanding a national unity government since all its ministers quit Sinioras cabinet nearly eight months ago. Siniora, backed by the United States, France and Saudi Arabia, has refused the opposition demand, which ultimately gives Syrias allies veto power in his government. |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Rocket-firing at Israel poses challenge to Lebanon army, UNIFIL |
2007-06-18 |
![]() Two Katyusha rockets exploded near the northern Israeli border town of Kiryat Shmona. There were no casualties, but roads and vehicles were damaged. They were fired from al-Edesa which is controlled by the Lebanese army and UNIFIL. The rocket-firing has raised fears over the UN resolution, which ended 34 days of military operations between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah fighters on August 14, 2006. Israeli security sources said they believed a Palestinian group had fired the rockets. Israel said it would not "succumb to provocation". The Lebanese group Hezbollah has denied any involvement in the attack. No-one has yet claimed responsibility for it. A Hezbollah spokesman in Beirut said his group was not involved in the attack, saying: "We had nothing to do with this." It is the first time Israel has come under such an attack from Lebanon since last year's conflict with Hezbollah. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) said it had nothing to do with the rocket attack at north Israel. The Lebanese army said in a release, "Unknown elements fired three 107-mm rockets at occupied Palestinian territories at 5:10 pm." Immediately, a Lebanese military force combed an area which might be the source of firing and where it found a rocket that was ready to fire, it said. For its part, the UNIFIL said the firing of Katyusha rockets was a serious breach of the UN Resolution 1701. Joint forces of the UNIFIL and Lebanese army have been deployed at the area in a bid to hunt the attackers and to thwart more potential rocket attacks, the UNIFIL added. Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad al-Siniora condemned the attack as aiming to cast doubts on the ability of the Lebanese army and the UNIFIL to protect south Lebanon, labeling it as "just attempts doomed to failure". Siniora vowed that all state security agencies would spare no effort to maintain security and stability in Lebanon. The incident came while the Lebanese army was still engaged in a violent gunfight with Fatah al-Islam militants at the Nahar al-Bared Palestinian Refugee Camp in north Lebanon, which claimed the lives of at least 65 soldiers and scores of militants. The incident also came as Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert arrived in New York for a three-day visit to the US. He had been informed of the attack. An Israeli official travelling with Olmert said: "It seems that it was Palestinians, not Hezbollah." Israel believed Palestinians were trying to trigger a military response but it would "not be drawn in", the official said. |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Lebanon battles a new demon |
2007-05-23 |
The last thing Lebanon needed was an internal war between its armed forces and clandestine cells with links to al-Qaeda. The last thing Syria needed was to be blamed for the violence. The Lebanese are already worried - too worried - about what the future holds for them. The standoff between the March 14 Coalition and the Hezbollah-backed opposition continues, headed by US-backed Saad al-Hariri on one front and Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah and his Christian ally Michel Aoun on the other. Prime Minister Fouad al-Siniora refuses to step down, and Parliament is still in recess as presidential elections approach, with no consensus on who the new president will be. The Lebanese public has barely recovered from the Israeli war on Hezbollah last summer to be confronted with internal political bickering and, now, radical military-political Islam. The fighting in the refugee camp is some of the bloodiest internal feuding since the 1975-90 civil war and threatens Lebanon's delicate political fabric with disintegration. Clearly a radical group like Fatah al-Islam makes the situation more complicated in the overall political situation in Lebanon, which is already on the verge of explosion. It will strain security for the Siniora cabinet and give it an additional thing to blame on the Syrians. Yet it makes no sense for Syria to support a radical political and military Islamic group in Lebanon. Abssi's record in Syrian jails is enough proof of how illogical it would be to accuse him of being on the payroll of the Syrians. Radical political Islam has been a threat to Syria ever since the republic was created in 1932. It always has been a secular regime in Damascus - at times without the Syrians even knowing it. The Syrians will not and cannot ally themselves with political Islam. Simply put, such an alliance would backfire and result in violence within Syria, something that President Bashar al-Assad will not tolerate. That explains why the Syrians have closed their border with Lebanon over the fighting, fearing the worst. Some want to use Fatah al-Islam's outburst as further ammunition against Damascus. Some equally want to use the incident to justify a clampdown on Islamic groups in Lebanon, either Sunni or Shi'ite. It is always easy for the Lebanese to blame Syria. But the Lebanese government and, particularly, its army and security forces are too weak to crack down on a bunch of terrorists on their own territory. If anybody is to blame for Fatah al-Islam, it is the Siniora government, which has tolerated it for six months, knowing perfectly well that it has existed since last November. Sami Moubayed is a |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Seniora to ask UN Security Council to consider Tueni murder |
2005-12-12 |
![]() For his part, MP Saad Al-Hariri, son of the slain former premier, denounced the murder of Tueni and called for trying the perpetrators before an international court. He made the statement from Paris, where he is currently. He said those who killed his father were also responsible for killing MP Tueni. In the meantime, Minister of Education and Higher Education, Khalid Kabbani, said all public and private schools, universities and institutes across the nation will remain closed throughout Tuesday in protest to the assassination of Tueni. Tueni's father, Ghassan Tueni, arrived here coming from Paris aboard a private jet today. A Lebanese cabinet session is currently in progress to consider the terror attack which claimed Tueni's life Monday morning. |
Link |