Europe | ||||
Motassadeq guilty (again) | ||||
2005-08-20 | ||||
HAMBURG, Germany, Aug. 19 - A Moroccan man brought to trial in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks was convicted Friday, when a German court found him guilty of belonging to a terrorist organization and sentenced him to seven years in prison. But the man, Mounir el-Motassadeq, 31, was found guilty only of belonging to Al Qaeda, specifically to a cell in Hamburg, whose other members included ringleaders in the Sept. 11 attacks. Mr. Motassadeq was acquitted of a more serious charge, of complicity in the attacks, with the presiding judge in the trial criticizing the United States for refusing to release information that the court regarded as central to the case and necessary for a conviction on the complicity charge. "This was a difficult case," the judge, Ernst-Rainer Schudt, said as he announced the verdict. "It didn't make it easier that the United States would not allow its intelligence services to give testimony here." Mr. Motassadeq was among the first to be charged in connection with the attacks and is also among the first to be convicted, albeit for a different crime. In April, Zacarias Moussaoui pleaded guilty to participating in a Qaeda conspiracy to fly planes into American buildings, but he said the plan was to fly a plane into the White House, unrelated to the Sept. 11 plot. Mr. Motassadeq's conviction and sentencing on Friday were the latest developments in a case that has dragged on for three years, through two long trials and one appeal. A lawyer for Mr. Motassadeq, Udo Jacob, said Friday he would appeal the new verdict. "My client is not a terrorist," he said. "It's important for him that the whole world knows that."
The verdict seemed to surprise Mr. Motassadeq, who entered court dressed casually in jeans and a plaid shirt, smiling and chatting with his lawyer and interpreter.
Mr. Motassadeq also had power of attorney over a bank account of one of the hijackers, Marwan al-Shehhi, and transferred money from the account to one of Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who is believed to have been an organizer of the plot along with its architect, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. Both are in American custody. All along, Mr. Motassadeq has denied knowing of the plot and of intentionally providing it with support.
This information was provided to the court in a letter from the German authorities, who had been given summaries of the interrogations by American intelligence services. During the yearlong second trial, which ended Friday, the United States provided some additional information from the interrogations but apparently not enough to lead the seven judges in the case to find Mr. Motassadeq guilty of involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks. "The point is we would have liked to have questioned them ourselves," Judge Schudt said in court, referring specifically to Mr. bin al-Shibh and Mr. Mohammed. "If they had been here, probably they would have availed themselves of their right not to testify, but at least it would have been helpful to have them here," the judge said. He added that summaries of their statements provided to the court did not constitute "sufficient proof in either direction," and that there was no way for the court to check their veracity. The United States government does not officially acknowledge it has custody of suspects like Mr. bin al-Shibh and Mr. Mohammed, although it is widely known that it does. The government has never agreed to make them available for any reason in any legal case, not even in the federal prosecution of Mr. Moussaoui. The 9/11 commission was allowed to review portions of reports based on interrogations of the detainees, but even then the commission had no direct access to any of them. Mr. Motassadeq's lawyers had argued that whatever the Qaeda detainees told interrogators, they might have made the statements Judge Schudt said on Friday, "When we asked the Americans under what circumstances the questioning of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al-Shibh took place, the answer was 'no comment.' " The judge also referred to Matthew Walsh, an F.B.I. agent who came to Hamburg to testify in the Motassadeq trial, but who, Judge Schudt said, answered most questions with the phrases "not available" or "not authorized to answer such questions." While the court rejected the prosecution's claim that Mr. Motassadeq was a knowing member of the Sept. 11 conspiracy, Judge Schudt said there was little doubt that he was a member of Al Qaeda and shared its goal of carrying out jihad against Americans and Jews. "Nine-eleven was carried out by fanatics, and you, Mr. Motassadeq, had the same way of thinking as these men," the judge said. "It is not important what exactly you did in Afghanistan, but what is important is that you were there in a training camp of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan." | ||||
Link |
Europe | |||
Moroccan jailed in 9/11 retrial | |||
2005-08-19 | |||
![]()
| |||
Link |
Europe |
9/11 commission findings strain German case |
2005-03-09 |
An attorney for the Sept. 11 commission testified Tuesday that the conspiracy to fly hijacked airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was conceived and planned outside Germany, complicating prosecutors' efforts to convict a Moroccan man for aiding the Hamburg cell that carried out the attacks. Dietrich Snell, who headed the commission's team that investigated the origins and role of the Hamburg cell, told a panel of five German judges hearing the case that the ringleader, Mohamed Atta, and the other Sept. 11 hijackers did not develop the idea for the plot on their own. Rather, Snell testified, they were recruited by al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden during a visit to militant training camps in Afghanistan. "This is a subject that we spent considerable time investigating," Snell said. "Ultimately, we did not arrive at the conclusion that there was solid evidence of any contact" between Hamburg cell members and al Qaeda leaders about the plot before the Hamburg group's trip to Afghanistan. The commission's findings contradict the heart of Germany's case against the Moroccan defendant, Mounir Motassadeq, who is accused of more than 3,000 counts of accessory to murder and membership in a terrorist organization. Prosecutors must prove that important elements of the conspiracy took place in Germany. Before Sept. 11, 2001, it was legal in Germany to belong to a foreign terrorist organization such as al Qaeda as long as it was not active in the country. Motassadeq, a college student in Hamburg before the attacks, was a close friend of Atta's and others involved in the operation. Prosecutors say he traveled with them to Afghanistan, gave them financial assistance and helped cover for their absence when they left for the United States to prepare for the hijackings. But prosecutors have been unable to produce direct evidence that Motassadeq knew about the plot, another crucial point necessary for a conviction. German authorities and the judges had pressed the Sept. 11 commission since last summer to send an emissary to Hamburg to testify about the commission's landmark report released last summer. But after the first of Snell's two days of scheduled testimony, it was the defense that seemed most pleased with what he had to say. "Today's statements have been very good for us," said Udo Jacob, an attorney for Motassadeq. "Everything so far has been nice." Motassadeq, 31, was convicted on the charges in 2003 and sentenced to 15 years in prison, the maximum under German law. But an appeals court overturned the verdict, ruling that the evidence did not justify the result. The appeals court also said Motassadeq deserved access to statements made by al Qaeda leaders in U.S. custody, reasoning that they could be used to help his defense. In response, the U.S. Justice Department provided the German court with summaries of interrogations of Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Ramzi Binalshibh, two al Qaeda figures deeply involved in the hijacking plot. The statements were made public in August at the start of Motassadeq's retrial and largely supported the defendant's alibi -- that he was unaware of the plot and had been intentionally kept in the dark. The judicial panel hearing the case has expressed frustration with what it considers a lack of cooperation from the United States. Requests to interview Binalshibh and Mohammed have been denied, as have petitions for more detailed investigative reports from the FBI and CIA. On Tuesday, Ernst-Rainer Schudt, the presiding judge, repeatedly prodded Snell to provide background information about the commission's sources and findings. Snell declined for the most part, replying that such information was classified and that he was largely restricted to testifying about details in the commission's published report. |
Link |