Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Outsourced and exposed: Civilian contractors are on the frontlines of the Gaza war
2025-07-02
[IsraelTimes] As sanctioned firms secure Defense Ministry contracts, questions grow about oversight, legality, and the blurred line between soldier and civilian

With Israel’s war against the Hamas
..a regional Iranian catspaw,...
terror group in Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppression and disproportionate response...
in its 21st month, a quiet but dangerous reality has taken root: Civilian contractors, hired by the Defense Ministry, are regularly carrying out demolition, engineering and logistical work deep inside the war zone. Though officially noncombatants, many now operate on or near the front lines, assuming risks normally reserved for soldiers in uniform.

Those risks became tragically clear in late May, when 19-year-old David Libi, a civilian contractor, was killed by a bomb while operating engineering equipment during IDF operations in northern Gaza.

According to the military, Libi was working in the Jabalia area when the bomb detonated. He was the third Defense Ministry contractor killed in Gaza since the war began.

Libi worked for Libi Construction and Infrastructure, a firm recently sanctioned by the United Kingdom for supporting illegal West Bank outposts, and owned by his father, Harel Libi.

The UK Foreign Office accused the company of providing "logistical and financial support" for settlement expansion that led to the forced displacement of Paleostinians.

Harel Libi, a resident of the illegal West Bank outpost of Adei Ad, was also sanctioned for "acts of aggression and violence against Paleostinian individuals," as were other far-right activists involved in similar activity.

According to watchdog group Kerem Navot, Libi Construction has operated extensively in unauthorized areas of the West Bank, including building infrastructure for illegal outposts like Coco’s Farm, which was also sanctioned. Paleostinian groups have accused Libi’s employees of harassing local herders and preventing grazing.

Despite the sanctions and allegations, Libi Construction continued to operate under Defense Ministry contracts and remained active in Gaza. The ministry declined to comment on its continued collaboration with the company or on the broader role of civilian contractors in the Strip. Libi Construction did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Defense Ministry has hired numerous civilians like David Libi to take on demolition and logistical tasks, thereby freeing up IDF units for combat roles. But the use of civilian contractors in active war zones raises serious questions about oversight, legality, and the true nature of these workers’ status.

THE RISE OF CIVILIAN CONTRACTORS IN MODERN WARFARE
Dr. Ori Swed, director of the Texas Security Center at Texas Tech University, told The Times of Israel that while outsourcing in military contexts is not new, its scope and visibility have grown significantly since the 1990s.

He pointed to "high-profile cases" like Blackwater, the American private military contractor whose controversial role in the Iraq War brought international attention to the use of civilian contractors in active combat zones.

In 2007, Blackwater contractors escorting a US diplomatic convoy opened fire in Baghdad’s Nisour Square, killing 17 Iraqi civilians. The massacre led Iraq to revoke the company’s license to operate, though the US later reinstated it temporarily.

The incident prompted criminal convictions, FBI investigations, and widespread scrutiny of legal accountability for contractors. Erik Prince, Blackwater’s founder, has long denied wrongdoing, accusing the US government of targeting the company with what he called "baseless" claims — including allegations of negligence, racial discrimination, murder, and weapons smuggling.

Swed emphasized that incidents like that of Blackwater do not reflect the private military industry as a whole, describing it as a "tragic, extreme, and deeply problematic case."

"Military operations aren’t just about the shooting part," Swed said. "They involve construction, logistics, transportation, communications, even healthcare. When a state military doesn’t have all the resources or specialization in-house — or simply needs to expand capacity — it turns to the private sector."

In Gaza, these civilian contractors have been used to construct and demolish roads, clear rubble, and modify terrain to facilitate troop movements and control territory — actions Swed describes as key to modern military engineering.

Other private actors, like the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, have also entered the field, distributing food aid under Defense Ministry coordination. Since it launched in late May, the GHF said it has provided over 46 million meals to Paleostinian civilians, though its operations have been marred by reports of near-daily deadly shootings of Paleostinians attempting to reach distribution points across IDF lines.

THE PATH TO GAZA: BUREAUCRATIC AND OPAQUE
According to CivilEng, a private organization representing construction professionals in Israel, to take part in operations, companies must first register with the government’s Construction Center under the Technology and Logistics Directorate of the IDF, as well as with the Registrar of Contractors.

Only then can they apply to become recognized providers of government work and bid on Defense Ministry tenders.

The ministry’s Department of Engineering and Construction, according to its own website, is staffed by a mix of IDF officers and civilian engineers. It oversees the planning and execution of military infrastructure, including much of the work currently being carried out in Gaza.

Still, transparency around these operations is minimal. Swed notes that security concerns often prevent disclosure of information to the public.

"This entire field is shrouded in secrecy by design," he said. "Anything related to military operations — especially in conflict zones — involves layers of security. Contractors are no exception. Disclosing identities, contracts, even logistics, can put people’s lives at risk."

RISK WITHOUT RECOGNITION
Despite operating in war zones, contractors like Libi do not receive the same public recognition or legal protection as soldiers.

"When contractors die, it doesn’t register with the public the same way a soldier’s death does," Swed said. "There’s a perception that [contractors] are there for money and that they accepted the risk voluntarily."

Unlike IDF soldiers, civilian contractors are not considered combatants under international law and therefore are not entitled to prisoner-of-war status if captured.

They also operate under private contracts rather than formal military command, leaving oversight fragmented and accountability less defined. Contractors working in conflict zones are not covered by the institutional protections soldiers receive — such as pensions, long-term benefits, or legal aid through the military justice system — and must instead rely on basic civilian labor laws.

"The actors for these security companies are not soldiers...but at the same time, they’re not non-combatants," Swed explained.

He pointed to the broader political utility of outsourcing.

"It allows the state to reduce the political pressure that comes with military casualties or unpopular drafts," he said, adding that "sometimes, it’s simply more cost-effective and flexible than deploying military personnel."

However,
by candlelight every wench is handsome...
that flexibility can come at a human cost.

"This industry has had major legal issues, mostly related to labor rights and worker protections," Swed said. "When you’re operating in dangerous areas, far from oversight, the risk of exploitation increases."

A BLURRED LINE
Though exact numbers are not publicly available, the presence of Israeli civilian contractors in Gaza appears to be growing. Many reportedly come from West Bank settlements, raising further political questions about motivation, ideology, and government hiring preferences — though Swed cautions against speculation without hard evidence.

"It’s possible that [the current] government prefers to hire companies whose bids come from individuals with a particular motivation system," he acknowledged, but he maintained that it is impossible to determine the true reasoning without more information.

What is clear, however, is that the line between civilian and soldier in Israel’s war effort is becoming increasingly blurred. For contractors like Libi, the consequences are tragically clear — operating as civilians in a combat zone and taking on the dangers of war, without an official status or protection.
Link


Caribbean-Latin America
Haitian security forces carried out drone strikes against gang members in the city of Port-au-Prince.
2025-06-01
[PUBLISH.TWITTER]

Related:
Port-au-Prince: 2025-05-30 Blackwater founder Erik Prince teams with Haitian government to fight gang violence
Port-au-Prince: 2025-05-20 Haiti Woman Poisons 40 Gang Members by Giving Them Pies
Port-au-Prince: 2025-05-03 Trump administration takes hard line on Haitian violence, labels gangs foreign terrorist organizations
Link


Caribbean-Latin America
Blackwater founder Erik Prince teams with Haitian government to fight gang violence
2025-05-30
[FOX] Private military contractor Erik Prince, the former Navy SEAL and founder of Blackwater Worldwide, is working with the Haitian government to repel the gangs terrorizing the Caribbean nation.

Prince's role will be to advise the Haitian government and its undermanned and underequipped police force on how to take on the street gangs amid record levels of violence in which thousands of people have been killed, injured and abducted.

"That goes beyond just the security question and extends to restoring essential government services, but obviously everything is founded on restoring security," the source said.

Armed groups have taken over prisons, hospitals and swaths of territory, forcing people to flee their homes. In April 2024, thousands fled the capital of Port-au-Prince for rural regions because of escalating gang violence there.

The Pentagon deferred questions by Fox News Digital to the Haitian government, which has also been contacted by Fox News Digital.

Fox News Digital also reached out to Prince. While Blackwater no longer exists, Prince owns various private military entities, the New York Times reported.

Related:
Erik Prince 05/11/2025 Ecuador leader says Israel will provide intelligence to help country’s war on cartels
Erik Prince 03/16/2025 Ecuador pitches US military base and free trade deal to Trump allies, sources say
Erik Prince 02/27/2025 Military Contractors Propose Assisting Mass Deportations

Related:
Haitian government: 2025-05-03 Trump administration takes hard line on Haitian violence, labels gangs foreign terrorist organizations
Haitian government: 2023-02-03 Jamaica Becomes First Country to Volunteer for Military Operation in Haiti
Haitian government: 2021-07-13 Haiti is 'tinderbox' foreign policy challenge for Biden
Link


Caribbean-Latin America
Ecuador leader says Israel will provide intelligence to help country’s war on cartels
2025-05-11
[IsraelTimes] Daniel Noboa says UAE has also said it will help in fight against cocaine traffickers
Here’s hoping he is able to get what his country needs.
Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa has said he’s sought assistance from Israel and the United Arab Emirates to combat the narco mobs that are terrorizing the South American country.

In an interview in Gay Paree on Thursday night, the iron-fisted 37-year-old who won reelection last month said Israel and the UAE have agreed to provide intelligence "to help" fight cocaine traffickers.

Once-peaceful Ecuador averaged a killing every hour at the start of the year, as cartels battle for control over cocaine routes that pass through the nation’s ports.

During presidential campaigning, Noboa suggested US special forces should be deployed to Ecuador to tackle the violence and floated legal reforms to allow US bases to reopen.

Over the past week, he traveled to Italia, Spain, Britannia and La Belle France — some of the European countries experiencing rocketing cocaine consumption — to develop further security alliances, as well as Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

He said he spoke to Israeli and Emirati leaders about "cooperation on security at ports and borders... since the violence is there, in the areas or on the routes to the ports."

But Noboa admitted that "there is not much interest so far" from foreign powers in establishing military bases in the Andean country.

In March, he announced a security alliance with Erik Prince, founder of the controversial American security company Blackwater, whose employees killed and maimed dozens of civilians in Iraq.

Asked about the pact, Noboa said Prince was merely acting in a "consultancy" capacity.

After a close-run race in the first round of Ecuador’s election Noboa easily defeated left-wing lawyer Luisa Gonzalez in April’s run-off.

While Gonzalez had pitched herself as a political everywoman who would improve the lot of poor Ecuadorans, Noboa — heir to a banana export empire — staked his political fortunes on his war on the cartels.

In March, he announced a preemptive amnesty for security forces fighting gangs in the violence-wracked port of Guayaquil, despite allegations of gross rights abuses by the military particularly.

His tough talk appeared to pay off, with the incumbent taking an 11-point lead over his rival.

Gonzalez rejected the results as fraudulent, without providing proof of her claim.

Noboa said his win was a "vote of confidence" in his policies.

He faces a tough task to unite a country grappling with its dramatic decline in fortunes.

Rampant bloodshed has spooked investors and tourists alike, fueling economic malaise and swelling the ranks of Ecuador’s poor to 28 percent of the population.

"More than anything, we need to attract foreign investment," Noboa said.

But in order to access bond markets, the government needs to lower its country’s risk factor.

Noboa assured that Ecuador’s economic fundamentals were "not bad," citing low inflation and record bank deposits, among other indicators.

"Our focus is job creation," he said.
Related:
Daniel Noboa 04/15/2025 Ecuador re-elects President Daniel Noboa amid nationwide unease over crime
Daniel Noboa 03/16/2025 Ecuador pitches US military base and free trade deal to Trump allies, sources say
Daniel Noboa 12/27/2024 Mozambique: 33 killed as hundreds of inmates escape from prison

Related:
Ecuador: 2025-05-07 Chinese 'Businessman' in Ecuador Allegedly Running Secret Police Station, Human Trafficking into U.S.
Ecuador: 2025-04-25 FBI Says Maduro Venezuelan Govt Helping Tren De Aragua Terrorist Group Migrate To U.S.
Ecuador: 2025-04-15 Ecuador re-elects President Daniel Noboa amid nationwide unease over crime
Link


Caribbean-Latin America
Ecuador pitches US military base and free trade deal to Trump allies, sources say
2025-03-16
Trades are President Trump’s love language.
[Reuters] Ecuadorean officials have told allies of U.S. President Donald Trump that they are interested in hosting a U.S. military base in the South American country, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter.

The officials also said they were interested in inking a free trade deal with the United States, which has eluded the Andean nation, even as neighboring Colombia and Peru have had bilateral accords with the U.S. for over a decade, said the sources, who requested anonymity to describe private conversations.

The expressions of interest were delivered in recent weeks to Republican lobbyists in Washington close to the Trump administration, the sources said. It is unclear if the administration is itself aware of or interested in the proposals, and the White House National Security Council did not respond to a request for comment.

The military base pitch is the latest unconventional plan advanced by the administration of Ecuadorean President Daniel Noboa, who is trying to tamp down on crime and strengthen ties with Trump associates heading into a competitive April election.

On Wednesday, Noboa announced a "strategic alliance" with Erik Prince - a prominent Trump supporter and founder of controversial private military firm Blackwater - to take on crime and narcoterrorism in the country of 17 million.
Noboa, the 37-year-old heir to one of the country's biggest business fortunes, has publicly argued for bringing foreign military bases to Ecuador. The Ecuadorean legislature is in the early stages of a legislative process that could eliminate a constitutional ban on such facilities instituted in 2008 with the support of leftist former President Rafael Correa.

The U.S. government had a military base on the environmentally sensitive Galapagos Islands during World War II and a separate base used largely to combat narcotics trafficking on the mainland until 2009, at which point Correa forced Washington to abandon the outpost.

Several other small and medium-sized nations have been exploring unconventional ways of building ties with Washington, some of which appear designed to take advantage of Trump's transactional foreign policy impulses and willingness to entertain unconventional policy ideas.

Officials in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, for instance, have traveled to Washington in recent weeks to pitch the Trump administration on a critical minerals deal between the two nations. Officials in El Salvador, governed by conservative President Nayib Bukele, a prominent Trump ally, have offered to host criminals deported from the U.S. in Salvadoran jails.

Ecuador's government recently selected Washington-based Mercury Public Affairs to represent its interests with the Trump administration, according to a Monday filing with a Justice Department division that oversees foreign lobbying efforts.

The filing outlining the lobbying contract does not include any reference to military bases. It does identify "migration, trade, and security issues, including anti-terrorism efforts" as potential areas of collaboration.

The Ecuadorean foreign ministry and Mercury Public Affairs did not respond to requests for comment.

TIGHT ELECTION
Ecuador is heading for a tight April 13 runoff election that will pit Noboa against leftist Luisa Gonzalez, a protege of Correa.

Noboa has campaigned on what he says has been a 15% cut in violent deaths last year, a reduction in prison violence and the capture of major gang leaders. He has vowed to keep deploying the military on the streets and in prisons to fight insecurity.

The Noboa administration is also seeking to develop strategies alongside the State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs to "fight narcoterrorism," according to the Monday filing with the Justice Department.

Gonzalez, 47, has expressed opposition to the presence of foreign troops in Ecuador while calling for more efforts to fight the drug trade-related crime that has rocked the country in recent years. She has pledged to pursue corrupt judges and prosecutors and roll out a social spending plan in the most violent areas.

One of the sources familiar with the Ecuadoreans' interactions with Republican lobbyists said they were likely asking for too many deliverables in too short a time. The State Department tends to limit bilateral engagement directly before elections so as not to appear to be supporting a particular party, the source noted.

Trump has pledged to fight narcotics trafficking in Latin America, and he has at times expressed an interest in expanding U.S. hard power. He has, for instance, threatened to invade Panama, floated acquiring Greenland and said the U.S. could effectively take over Gaza.

But his administration's engagement with Latin America has not always followed an obvious pattern.

He has repeatedly threatened to slap 25% across-the-board tariffs on Mexico - which partially took effect earlier in March - amid dissatisfaction with that country's attempts to combat fentanyl trafficking, while at the same time complimenting Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.

His administration has made a deportation deal with Venezuela, a regional foe, but also declined to renew Chevron's license to operate there, a move which has further isolated that nation economically.
Related:
Ecuador: 2025-03-08 ¡Adiós! AOC Aide, an Illegal Immigrant, Self-Deports to Colombia
Ecuador: 2025-03-06 DOGE slashes entire government agency with average salary of $131,000 a year to just ONE staff
Ecuador: 2025-02-25 ICE Nabs Notorious Smuggler of Illegal Aliens
Related:
Daniel Noboa 12/27/2024 Mozambique: 33 killed as hundreds of inmates escape from prison
Daniel Noboa 04/09/2024 You can't get away with bananas. Ecuadorian security forces seize the Mexican embassy
Daniel Noboa 03/18/2024 Russian military expert suspects provocation in a WSJ article about shell aid to Ukraine

Link


-Great Cultural Revolution
Military Contractors Propose Assisting Mass Deportations
2025-02-27
From two days ago.
[NewsMax] Military contractors have proposed helping the execution of President Donald Trump
...They hit him with slander, they impeached him twice. Nancy Pelosi tore up his State of the Union address on national TV. They stole an election and put his adherents in jail. They vilified him. They couldn't crucify him, so they shot him. Still, they can't keep him down...
's mass deportations of illegal migrants colonists, according to a report.

Before the Jan. 20 inauguration, a group of contractors gave Trump advisers a 26-page summary of a plan that would cost $25 billion, Politico reported.

The group is led by former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince and Bill Mathews, the former chief operating officer of Blackwater, which provided security, training and logistical support to U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan following the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

The contractors' proposal included the use of "processing camps" on military bases, a private fleet of 100 planes, and a "small army" of private citizens empowered to make arrests, the outlet added.

Politico reported that White House officials were in talks with military contractors, particularly as Congress works to agree on a budget and secure funding for the border and immigration.

Nearly 500,000 illegal aliens per month would need to be deported to achieve the contractors' goal of 12 million deportees before the 2026 midterms.

"To keep pace with the Trump deportations, it would require a 600% increase in activity. It is unlikely that the government could swell its internal ranks to keep pace with this demand ... in order to process this enormous number of deportations, the government should enlist outside assistance," the plan said.
Link


Home Front: Politix
The founder of the Blackwater PMC said that Ukraine will not regain lost territories
2025-02-27
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[Regnum] The creator of the Blackwater PMC, American entrepreneur Eric Prince, said on February 26 that Ukraine's chances of regaining its lost territories are slim.

The Kiev regime should have started peace talks a year and a half ago, Prince told Hillsdale College President Larry Arnn in an interview published on the college's website.

"The chances that the Ukrainians will be able to get all their territories back are zero. The Russians will never give up Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, Mariupol, the traditional Russian-speaking regions. They won't give up Crimea either," the founder of the PMC said.

Kyiv should remember that an "imperfect peace" is better than any war, Prince said. He called the current fighting a war of attrition and stressed that Russia has far more resources than Ukraine.

As reported by the Regnum news agency, US President Donald Trump previously stated that it would not be easy for Ukraine to regain its lost territories. At the same time, he admitted that the Kiev regime “maybe” will be able to “get something back.”

On February 26, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov ruled out the possibility of freezing military actions along the contact line. This contradicts the Russian Constitution, the minister emphasized. Earlier, he noted that Russia does not intend to make territorial concessions to Ukraine.

In June 2024, President Vladimir Putin noted that one of the conditions for Russia's negotiations with Ukraine would be a statement by the Kiev regime about abandoning its plans to join NATO. Also, to begin negotiations, Kiev must recognize territorial realities and withdraw troops from the territories of the regions that returned to Russia in 2022 (DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporizhia regions), the head of state said.

In September 2024, Secretary of the Russian Security Council Sergei Shoigu noted that Moscow would not conduct any negotiations with Kiev until it drove Ukrainian terrorists out of the Kursk region.

More from regnum.ru
Founder of the American PMC Blackwater Prince acknowledged the power of the Russian army

The combat capability and effectiveness of the Russian Armed Forces units have increased sharply since the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine. This was stated by the founder of the American private military company Blackwater, Erik Prince, the Hillsdale College YouTube channel.

“The Russian army is now much better and more dangerous than it was at the beginning of the conflict,” the entrepreneur noted.

He noted that Russia has significantly more people and ammunition than Ukraine. At the same time, according to Prince, the defense industry of the United States and Western European countries is lagging in development, suffers from high production costs, which limits its effectiveness.

“I think this should be a wake-up call for America,” the PMC founder added.

Prince assessed Ukraine's chances of regaining its lost territories as "near zero." He noted that Kyiv should have agreed to a peace deal a year and a half ago, since the Ukrainian Armed Forces are currently waging a war of attrition.

As reported by the Regnum news agency, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on December 19 that the Russian army's combat readiness is currently the highest in the world, and the same applies to the Russian defense industry. He noted that the country is increasing production of everything needed for the army and navy, and is doing so confidently and quickly.

In the Global Firepower military power rating, Russia remained in second place, behind only the United States. The “strength index” of the Russian army, according to the rating, is 0.0788. The American military power indicator was 0.0744. Russia is followed by China, India, South Korea and the United Kingdom — the top six has not changed since last year.

The head of the Bureau of Military-Political Analysis, Alexander Mikhailov, said in January 2024 that the Russian army is superior to all others in terms of combat capability. According to him, Russia has the greatest nuclear potential and the most powerful and fastest delivery systems.
Related:
Eric Prince 12/12/2021 Russian film Granite Trailer
Eric Prince 01/16/2019 Fighting in the Shadows

Link


Government Corruption
Senator Lee Raises a Key Question About Republicans and DOGE
2025-02-19
[Townhall] Republican Senator Mike Lee is raising a key question about how the swamp became so swampy and why the Grand Old Party went along with it for years.

"The next time you hear House or Senate Republicans complaining about federal funds being used to fund studies on how cocaine-using, gender-non-conforming crayfish perform on a treadmill, ask them how many times they’ve joined nearly all Democrats to pass spending bills that (1) they never had the chance to read, much less debate or amend, and (2) were opposed by most Republicans," Lee posted on X.

"The easy, routine passage of such bills—without any meaningful opportunity for debate or modification, and supported by just enough Republican votes to ensure passage—all but ensures the perpetuation of excessive, wasteful spending," Lee continued. "This is a habit that must come to an end if we’re ever going to get federal spending under control. It’s a habit that can’t be blamed entirely on Democrats."

Related:
Mike Lee 02/02/2025 Erik Prince: Letters of Marque Would Allow Private Organizations to Wipe Out Drug Cartels
Mike Lee 01/23/2025 Bureau of Prisons director out as Trump's Justice Department reforms take shape
Mike Lee 12/11/2024 Trump announces more picks, nominates Kimberly Guilfoyle to serve as ambassador to Greece

Link


Home Front: WoT
Military Increases Surveillance of Mexican Cartels-
2025-02-15
[NewsMax] The military is increasing its surveillance of Mexican drug cartels to collect intelligence to determine how to best counter their activities, the top general overseeing troops in North America said on Thursday.

"We have also increased some uniquely military capabilities that will get after... the cartels, which are driving the illegal migration, and that is primarily through airborne ISR to get more information on those and figure out how we can counter their actions," said Air Force General Gregory Guillot, head of U.S. Northern Command.

Asked if he would need a carrier strike group in the waters between the United States and Mexico, Guillot said: "I will need significant increased maritime presence in cooperation with the Coast Guard."
Related:
Mexican drug cartel: 2025-02-12 Feds likely eyeing 'cover-ups' to bust Mexican cartels along border: former DEA agent
Mexican drug cartel: 2025-02-06 Massive layoffs at the CIA
Mexican drug cartel: 2025-02-02 Erik Prince: Letters of Marque Would Allow Private Organizations to Wipe Out Drug Cartels
Link


Caribbean-Latin America
Erik Prince: Letters of Marque Would Allow Private Organizations to Wipe Out Drug Cartels
2025-02-02
[Breitbart] Letters of Marque would allow private organizations to operate in the “dead space” in between government bureaucracies where the Mexican drug cartels operate, Erik Prince, an American veteran and the founder of Unplugged Technologies explained during an interview with Breitbart News Saturday.

Prince spoke with Breitbart News Washington Bureau Chief Matthew Boyle about a recent post from Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), discussing what Letters of Marque and Reprisal were and how they could be used to weaken the drug cartels. Prince admitted that he had “helped put this idea in Senator Lee’s head.”

“Letters of marque and reprisal are government-issued commissions that authorize private citizens (privateers) to perform acts that would otherwise be considered piracy, like attacking enemy ships during wartime Privateers are rewarded with a cut of the loot they ‘bring home,'” Lee explained in his post.

When asked by Boyle “what the process would be for a Letter of Marque to be issued” and if it would come from the White House or Congress, Prince explained that the “last Letter of Marque” had been issued after Pearl Harbor “to a blimp operator who was authorized to hunt Japanese submarines.”

“I believe the last Letter of Marque was actually issued after Pearl Harbor in 1942, and it was actually issued to a blimp operator who was authorized to hunt Japanese submarines off the coast of California. And, I don’t know if that was a simple vote of Congress, or if that was a committee procedure, or what. But, that model — you could actually do something similar with a presidential finding today, giving an entity — a private organization a hunting license. And, then of course, when they were issued to ships, you’d have to post a bond — a performance bond of certain rules you’re going to follow, effectively rules of engagement for them to proceed,” Prince explained.

“So, that could be done in certain areas of Mexico, certain areas of Latin America, to soak up the spoils of the illegal trade and of course the cartels’ ability to operate and to terrorize local civilian populations,” Prince said.

When asked by Boyle if Prince thought this “would help solve the problem of the Mexican drug cartels” and help the United States “do certain things that maybe we aren’t doing” in order to stop the flow of drugs and human trafficking across the border, Prince explained that “one of the system problems” the U.S. has with its security apparatus “is all kinds of stove pipes.”

“One of the systemic problems we have — call it a structural problem of the U.S. security apparatus is all kinds of stove pipes. Because now you have China organizing fentanyl. So, you have a paycom area interest, pushing chemicals into Mexico, where they’re now fabricated into fentanyl and then pushed north. So, is it a northern command issue? Is it a DEA issue? Is it a border patrol issue? Is it a paycom issue?” Prince said.

“The problem is, you have so many different bureaucracies involved that no one is able to swim in between those bureaucracies in that dead space — the cartels do, but no government entity can move that quickly. So, the cartels basically operate inside of the OODA Loop of the U.S. government. And, really, only a private organization is going to be able to move that decisively with the flexibility required.”

“The cartels make enormous amounts of money that let’s them buy very good technology, very high end talent, very high end weaponry. They out gun Mexican law enforcement. I feel terrible for a state or local cop, or a federal cop in Mexico, because within days of coming on to a certain drug team, their family members are getting visited,” Prince continued.
Related:
Erik Prince 02/01/2025 Not the First Time. Why the US Is Right to War for the Panama Canal
Erik Prince 01/19/2025 Erik Prince: Chinese Influence on Panama Canal a ‘National Security Problem'
Erik Prince 01/11/2025 Marines armed with machine guns storm the streets... and then all hell breaks loose. A minute-by-terrifying-minute account of how America could invade Greenland, Russia's chilling threat... and who could be next

Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Not the First Time. Why the US Is Right to War for the Panama Canal
2025-02-01
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.

In many ways, the appearance of this article underscores Russian Federation president Vladimir Putin's adaptation of the "Zhirinovsky Doctrine", which states the US holds sway over the Americas in the western hemisphere without interference from Russia, while Russia holds away over south Asia, again without opposition from the US and NATO.

by Artemy Sharapov

[REGNUM] In his “throne speech,” US President Donald Trump repeated his frequent promise to make the Panama Canal American again—to return the main artery of the Western Hemisphere to the ownership of the United States.

Trump said that the authorities of the Republic of Panama (under whose sovereign control the canal, previously owned by the United States, has been since 1999) are not fulfilling their management responsibilities. Therefore, the United States must return what is its own, the newly elected owner of the White House is sure.

It is significant that Trump is sending his newly appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio on his first foreign trip to Panama.

"The most important thing is that China controls the canal. We didn't give the canal to China, we gave it to Panama, and we're giving it back," Trump said.

Newly appointed Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, nicknamed "The Crusader," clarified on January 30 that the United States is prepared to use force to "ensure freedom" of navigation through the canal. Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino has issued more than one "decisive response" to threats from Washington. But it is ironic that Mulino did so on the X social network owned by Elon Musk, who recently astonished the world with an ambiguous gesture. If it was a "Roman salute," then it is quite consistent with the neo-imperial sentiments of the creators of the "new golden age of the United States": with plans to absorb Canada, Greenland, and take back the Panama Canal.

However, the question of ownership of this 80-kilometer sea route has been a “sore subject” for the American administration over the past 150 years, so Trump is not original in his attempts to resolve this issue by force.

By a curious coincidence, today, January 31, marks exactly 35 years since the last (at least, for now, the last) attempt to resolve the Panama issue by armed means.

But before we recall in detail Operation Right Cause (which is what the American intervention of 1989 was called, without a hint of irony), let us recall the stage on which this action unfolded.

THE CHANNEL AND THE SCANDAL
Plans to build a canal through the narrow Isthmus of Panama, connecting the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (so that ships would not have to travel thousands of miles around Cape Horn), were first developed during the years of Spanish colonial rule in South America - but at that time such a project was practically impossible to implement.

The benefits of building a waterway were obvious to everyone in Europe and the New World. As early as 1827, none other than Johann Wolfgang von Goethe predicted, “I shall be surprised if the United States does not take up such an undertaking.”

But the French were the first to take up the matter.

Colombia, which had owned the Isthmus of Panama since the 1830s, brought the Panama Canal Company, founded in Paris, into the project in the late 1870s. Construction dragged on for a decade. And as a result, the word panama entered the French language, and then all the languages ​​of the world, meaning “a large and brazen scam.”

The company, having "given a bribe" to ministers and hundreds of deputies, received permission to collect money from citizens under a winning loan, and then... went bankrupt. It turned out that half of the 1.3 billion francs invested in the project "disappeared".

It was after this that the United States took over the initiative.

The prediction of the author of "Faust" came true in 1903, when Theodore Roosevelt (also known as Teddy and Rough Rider) was president. The United States, rapidly gaining economic and military power, was actively expanding throughout Latin America - from the Rio Grande to Cape Horn. They were quite capable of implementing a project that promised to shorten the route from New York to San Francisco from 23 thousand to 9.5 thousand km.

In 1903, a deal was made whereby the United States leased a strip of territory ten kilometers wide from Columbia for a period of 100 years.

However, the process of ratifying the deal in the Colombian parliament stalled. The country had just ended another civil war (its events formed the basis for Gabriel García Márquez's novella "Nobody Writes to the Colonel"). The winners and losers were unable to reach a compromise on the canal issue, so the US decided to move on to plan "B" - separating the department of Panama from the Republic of Colombia by force.

SEPARATION AND REVOLUTION
In the fall of 1903, unrest and demonstrations began in Panama demanding independence for the region. Attempts by the Colombian authorities to suppress the protests were stopped by direct intervention by the United States. Teddy Roosevelt called this the Big Stick Policy, that is, “resolving conflicts” with the help of American military power. Trump clearly likes this approach as well.

The Republic of Panama was proclaimed on November 3, and 10 days later the new state was recognized by the United States, after which the act of transferring the territory of the future canal to American control was ratified. After the completion of construction in 1914, the States established a de facto monopoly on its use.

The state of Panama was essentially an American protectorate. In particular, local authorities were prohibited from having their own armed forces for fear that the strategic maritime trade route would be captured. Over time, the United States decided to create the Panama National Guard, whose tasks included fighting communist rebels. This decision played a cruel joke on Washington.

In 1969, a group of National Guard soldiers, who had by then become a real force, overthrew the country's government. Colonel Omar Efraim Torrijos came to power, promoted himself to brigadier general and proclaimed himself the leader of the revolution.

The junta led by Torrijos began to put pressure on the United States, demanding that it transfer control of the canal to the Panamanian Republic.

In 1977, Líder Máximo de la Revolución - Supreme Leader of the Revolution Torrijos and US President Jimmy Carter signed an agreement on the neutrality of the canal territory and its subsequent transfer to Panama's control. However, on July 31, 1981, the Supreme Leader's plane crashed under unclear circumstances, and Torrijos himself died.

But the process of nationalization continued under his successor.

The new head of the republic was Colonel Manuel Antonio Noriega, one of the commanders of the National Guard of Panama. Coming from the lower classes, Noriega received the nickname "Pineapple Face" due to the consequences of smallpox he suffered. As an officer of the National Guard, he acted together with American intelligence services in the fight against Marxist movements. In this field, he earned the status of "Our Son of a Bitch" and could lead Panama without fear.

Some may ask why the United States even entered into negotiations with some juntas and ceded the Panama Canal, which was so important to them.

However, there is nothing surprising about this. By the early 1980s, the United States seemed to be losing ground around the world, losing its status as a superpower. The defeat in Vietnam in 1975, the anti-American revolution in Iran with the seizure of the American embassy hit the country's image very hard.

The situation is somewhat similar to the situation in the United States today: an incompetent democratic government, failures in key areas of domestic and foreign policy, and a despondent mood in the White House. It seemed that the United States was close to defeat in the Cold War.

AN EXEMPLARY FLOGGING IN THE NAME OF DEMOCRACY
In this environment, a new administration came to power, led by Republican Ronald Reagan.

The future president went to the elections with a set of slogans that were repeated in our time by another eccentric leader - Donald Trump. In fact, the slogan "Make America Great Again" was put forward specifically for Reagan's election campaign. The new president announced the beginning of a "Crusade" against communists.

In 1983, for the first time since Vietnam, the United States decided to undertake a large-scale intervention.

In late October, the United States launched a military operation in Grenada, overthrowing the country's leftist government, which was oriented toward the USSR and Cuba. "We could not allow the specter of Vietnam to hang over the country forever and prevent us from protecting our legitimate national security interests... We did not ask anyone's permission, but did what we thought was right," Reagan later wrote in his memoirs.

However, the Noriega regime in Panama seemed to be under no threat so far.

"Colonel Pineapple Face" remained in good standing in Washington and was considered an ally in the crusade against the "Reds." For a while, the United States even turned a blind eye to Panama's involvement in the Colombian drug trade, which by the mid-1980s had reached unprecedented proportions. However, Noriega committed a more "grave sin" in Washington's eyes.

He was caught collaborating with the left.

In 1988, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) accidentally discovered that Noriega's regime had colluded with the governments of Cuba and Nicaragua, which also had a stake in the Colombian drug trade. Once this became known in Washington, Panama's fate was effectively sealed.

In January 1989, Reagan was replaced as US President by another Republican, George H.W. Bush.

Bush, not distinguished by the odiousness of his predecessor, continued Reagan's policy, but used a fundamentally new strategy. In April 1989, the United States imposed tough economic sanctions against Panama. A month later, the country held presidential elections, which were won by the opposition candidate. Noriega did not recognize the election results.

After that, the CIA organized an attempted coup in the country, which, however, was suppressed. Thus, the US tried out a model for changing undesirable regimes: economic pressure, attempts at an internal coup, and if that didn’t work, a direct military invasion.

After the CIA's involvement in the coup was revealed, Noriega demanded that the US withdraw its troops from Panama. The next day, a provocative incident occurred: Panamanian National Guard soldiers killed an American soldier and raped his wife. The US government sanctioned the military operation "Operation Just Cause", which was to become a "show flogging".

It was during the preparation of military actions in Panama that the United States first conducted an information campaign, justifying its actions by the need to “protect human rights” and “restore democracy.” This model was subsequently used to justify aggression against Iraq, Yugoslavia, Somalia, and a number of other countries.

HARD ROCK FOR A DICTATOR
A contingent of 26,000 people was formed to carry out the operation — mainly special forces fighters, supported by 100 armored vehicles and more than 200 military aircraft and helicopters. At the same time, there were only 11,000 people in the ranks of the Panamanian self-defense forces. The national guard had virtually no air defense, aviation, or armored vehicles at its disposal.

On the night of December 19-20, 1989, the United States launched a massive air strike on Panama. The targets of the attacks were the bases of the self-defense forces, most of the military did not even have time to take up organized defense. After that, 84 transport aircraft dropped a large landing force of the 75th Special Forces Regiment in Panama, which captured military and civilian airfields. After that, planes landed with personnel and armored vehicles of the 82nd Airborne Division.

Security forces loyal to the Noriega regime attempted to organize pockets of resistance, taking up defensive positions in government buildings and hastily constructed firing positions. However, the forces were initially unequal. By the end of the first day of the operation, the American military had captured the headquarters of the National Defense Forces, after which any organized resistance ceased.

During the fighting, the American special forces lost 23 people killed and about 300 wounded. As a result of the aggression, 500 Panamanian citizens died, including 50 self-defense forces. Noriega tried to hide in the Vatican embassy, ​​but the American military installed powerful speakers around the building playing heavy rock music. Three days later, the former dictator left the embassy and was arrested. Noriega subsequently died in a Panamanian prison, having served time in the United States and France.

The out-of-control "son of a bitch" was punished - and this decision by Ronald Reagan, from the point of view of the current US administration, was correct. But - alas - Reagan did not reverse the decision, which Trump did not hesitate to call "stupid". The Torrijos-Carter Treaty remained in force, from 1979 to 1999 the Panama Canal Zone was under joint administration by the US and the Republic of Panama, with the prospect of being handed over to the Panamanians.

This is what happened in 2000, when the United States handed over control of the canal to the country's government, concluding an agreement on the neutrality of the waterway.

DREAMS OF REVENGE
Trump also addressed the issue of “returning Panama” during his first presidential term – even then he was concerned about the contacts of the small but strategically important Central American state with China, with which Trump was waging trade wars.

However, it is precisely now that the new president’s threats should be taken seriously. As in the late 1980s, the United States is experiencing an internal crisis associated with a loss of direction and failures in foreign policy. In this regard, the populism of Trump, who managed to win the election under the slogans of returning to “former greatness,” is becoming dangerous for its neighbors.

During Trump's last term, the slogan "Make America Great Again" was discredited because it was not backed up by real action.

So the US may well go for a small, demonstrative military operation to prove to other countries and to itself: we are still strong and ready to achieve our goals.

Related:
Panama Canal: 2025-01-26 Davos Discomfort: Globalists Nervous Ahead of West-West War
Panama Canal: 2025-01-19 Erik Prince: Chinese Influence on Panama Canal a ‘National Security Problem'
Panama Canal: 2025-01-18 Squid Game: Why Denmark Doesn't Want to Sell Greenland to Trump
Link


Caribbean-Latin America
Erik Prince: Chinese Influence on Panama Canal a ‘National Security Problem'
2025-01-19
[Breitbart] Chinese efforts on the Panama Canal are a "national security problem," Erik Prince, veteran and founder of Unplugged Technologies, said during an appearance on Breitbart News Saturday.

"The Chinese have done the soft power move and taken over management, effectively, of the Panama Canal that the United States built more than a century ago, and then it was unwisely given up by Jimmy Carter in ’78 or ’79," Prince began, describing this as a "national security problem."

"Because if you have any kind of naval conflict, you have to be able to move our fleets from the Atlantic, Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. And the way you do that is through the Panama Canal. It saves you almost a month of transit time from going around the southern tip of Chile," he continued.

Prince said it is "absolutely essential" that the United States have security overwatch of the canal for these very reasons.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More