Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

India-Pakistan
Musharraf’s N-technology disclosure embarrassed Pakistan: Foreign Office
2017-08-15
[DAWN] The disclosure made by retired General Pervez Perv Musharraf
... former dictator of Pakistain, who was less dictatorial and corrupt than any Pak civilian government to date ...
in his 2006 autobiography that Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan transferred sensitive nucl­ear material to North Korea had come as a big embarrassment to the country, an official of the Foreign Office said on Friday at a meeting of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee.

The disclosure had forced the Foreign Office on the defensive and left it with no choice but to regurgitate the standard response that Pakistain was firmly against nuclear proliferation, the additional secretary said.

Foreign diplomats viewed the statement with scepticism and disbelief, he added.

The Foreign Office reply came in response to a question by Senator Farhatullah Babar as to what was North Korea’s official reaction to Pervez Musharraf’s revelation in his memoir, In the Line of Fire, that a clandestine proliferation network operating from Pakistain had transferred nearly two dozen centrifuge machines, a flow meter and some special oils to North Korea.
Link


Europe
Swiss magistrate recommends nuke smuggling charges
2010-12-24
[Pak Daily Times] Smuggling charges should be brought against three Swiss engineers suspected of giving nuclear weapons technology to a rogue network in Pakistain, a magistrate said on Thursday, in a case involving Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) ties, shredded documents and national security implications.

Investigating magistrate Andreas Mueller said his recommendation that the trio -- two brothers and a father -- face trial is based on an exhaustive probe into an alleged nuclear smuggling ring. Mueller submitted his confidential report to federal prosecutors, who will decide whether to bring charges on violating Swiss non-proliferation laws.

Mueller oversaw the last three years of a six-year federal probe against Urs Tinner, his brother Marco and their father Friedrich.

The politically sensitive case was slowed down after the Swiss government repeatedly ordered evidence destroyed in the case, allegedly under pressure from senior US officials. The Tinners are suspected of links to the nuclear smuggling network of nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan. They allegedly supplied Khan's black market nuclear network with the technical expertise and equipment used to make gas centrifuges. Khan sold the centrifuges for secret nuclear weapons programmes in countries that included Libya and Iran before his operation was disrupted in 2003.

Mueller, who said he is relieved to be done with the investigation, harshly criticised the Swiss government for having "massively interfered in the wheels of justice by destroying almost all the evidence". He said the government also ordered the federal criminal police not to cooperate with him.

"There are many parts. It is like a puzzle and if you put the puzzle together you get the whole picture," Mueller said at a news conference. "There is not (just) one piece of evidence, there are many pieces of evidence."

US officials in Bern had no immediate comment. Mueller said he recommended the three face charges for "supporting the development of atomic weapons" in violation of non-proliferation laws, while Marco Tinner should face additional charges of money laundering.

Mueller's 174-page report "is now being studied in detail" by the Swiss attorney general's office, which "will inform the public in due course" on whether charges will be filed against the Tinners, Federal Prosecutors Office spokeswoman Jeannette Balmer said.

He said the Tinners did not deny working for the AQ Khan network, but claimed they did not know his aim was to produce nuclear weapons. He also said the Tinners had worked for the CIA since June 2003.

"The findings are that the Tinners might be part of the Khan network," Mueller said after the news conference.

"And beginning where they should have known that Khan produced atomic weapons, in May 1998, until they started to collaborate with the secret services, in June 2003, they in their specific roles were part of this network, and delivered parts to the network that the network then itself delivered to other countries, (such) as Libya," Mueller said.
Link


India-Pakistan
Kazmi terms removal a conspiracy
2010-12-15
Is there anything in Pakistain that's not a conspiracy? They conspire over their corn flakes, fergawdsake!
[Dawn] The sacked Minister for Religious Affairs, Hamid Saeed Kazmi, on Tuesday maintained that his removal had come becuase of the slanging match between him and another minister, and not on corruption charges.

Speaking at an urs ceremony on the outskirts of Lahore, he termed his removal a conspiracy by a "particular lobby which was after me from the outset".

"All my defence, which came from respected people like Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan, fell on the deaf ears. Had there been any truth in the corruption charges, I would have resigned myself. I feel relaxed after the removal as a big load has been lifted," Mr Kazmi said.

"Rumors were preferred over facts, but everything will become clear soon," Mr Kazmi said, terming the 'campaign' against him a "trial by media".

The former federal minister, who belongs to the Barelvi school of thought, gave a call to Ulema and Mashaikh to unite to lend support to the people of their sect who attain high positions.
Link


India-Pakistan
'Fatwa' justifies Musharraf's murder
2010-10-24
Political leaders and religious scholars made a unanimous declaration justifying the murder of former president Gen (r) Pervez Perv Musharraf in Dire Revenge™ for killing Akbar Bugti and other innocent people, including students of Jamia Hafsa in Islamabad during his government.

The Jamhoori Watan Party of Talal Akbar Bugti sponsored the conference on Saturday in which prominent religious scholars and politicians participated and signed a joint declaration against Musharraf justifying his killing. The Jamaat-e-Islami, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, Majlis Wahdat Muslimeen Pakistain, Shia Ulema Council Balochistan, Tanzeem-e-Islam Pakistain, JUI-S and religious scholars participated in the conference. The theme of the conference was 'If Salman Rushdi deserved to be killed, why not Musharraf, who was responsible for killing innocent people and also of desecration of the holy Koran at Jamia Hafsa'.

The speakers criticised Musharraf for his unpardonable crimes against humanity and held him solely responsible for killing thousands of Balochs in a military operation, students of Jamia Hafsa, violation of the constitution, making changes in the Hudood Ordinance, insulting Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan, handing over Dr Aafia Siddiqui and Abdul Salam Asif to the US, violating the sanctity of mosques, and other unpardonable crimes against society and the state.
Link


India-Pakistan
Musharraf wanted to hand over Qadeer to US
2010-09-20
[Bangla Daily Star] Former Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf had all intentions of handing over nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan to the United States, former Prime Minister Mir Zafar Ullah Khan Jamali has disclosed.

Jamali said that he had summoned a cabinet meeting over the issue of the nuclear scientist and clearly told Musharraf that though he might be the president, but the government would not hand over Khan to the US, The Nation reports.

Upon the Cabinet's refusal, Musharraf over-turned his government, he added. Meanwhile, Qadeer Khan has endorsed Jamali's statement, calling him gentle, honest and sombre.

He added that he knew the former prime minister as a patriotic and loyal person, and had never seen him cheating anyone. Jamali's disclosure was absolutely correct and Pervez Musharraf was a traitor who has sold out his own country, Dr Khan claimed.
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistan pushes US for nuclear technology deal
2010-03-23
Pakistan wants the US to provide it with nuclear technology for a civilian energy programme and is to push the Obama administration this week for a deal.

Islamabad seeks a civilian nuclear deal to mirror the package granted to India by George Bush, a proposal that would prove contentious in Washington, given Pakistan's uneven record on combating extremist groups and its sale of nuclear technology to states hostile to the west, led by the former head of its programme, Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan.

A spokesman for Pakistan's ministry of foreign affairs, Abdul Basit, said today: "Pakistan is an energy-deficit country and we're looking for all sources, including nuclear, to meeting our requirements."

A team led by Pakistan's foreign minister that includes the country's army commander and spy chief is due to arrive in Washington on Wednesday for meetings with their US counterparts, including Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state, in an effort to relaunch dialogue between the two allies. Afghanistan and help for Pakistan's near-bankrupt economy will also be on the agenda.

Many experts believe Pakistan holds the key to stabilising Afghanistan and it is trying to position itself as a sole conduit to talk to the Taliban.

The US meetings, are designed to restart talks that were last held in 2008.

Pakistan believes it has suffered from the violent fallout of US-led intervention in neighbouring Afghanistan and requires further assistance, despite a recent $7.5bn (£5bn) US aid injection.

A civilian nuclear deal, which would provide technology and fuel for power plants, could be the carrot required for Pakistan to finally cut its ties to jihad groups. A variety of incentives since 2001, including military equipment and civilian aid, have not worked, say experts.

Christine Fair, an assistant professor at Georgetown University in Washington, said: "We need a big idea for Pakistan, to transform it from a source of insecurity for the region to a country committed to eliminating terrorism and ensuring that nuclear proliferation doesn't happen again.

"We're trying to get Pakistan to do things that are in our strategic interests but not in theirs."

Pakistan craves a nuclear deal because it aspires to parity with India, say analysts.

It bristles with indignation over the perceived special treatment accorded to India, which it believes has upset the regional balance of power in South Asia.

Prof Shaun Gregory, director of the Pakistan security research unit at Bradford University, said: "Through the deal, India became a de facto member of the nuclear club and Pakistan doesn't understand why it wasn't offered the same thing. Pakistan has to position itself as an equal to India."

While Pakistan and India used to be bracketed together, Pakistan is now lumped in with Afghanistan under "Af-Pak", a diplomatic relegation, while India is lauded as a growing power.

Pakistan's past record of nuclear proliferation hangs over it, especially as its renegade scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan, continues to make revelations about his secret arms sales. Khan was placed under house arrest in 2004 but has since been released.

David Albright, a former UN weapons inspector who is president of Institute for Science and International Security, an independent thinktank in Washington, said: "Pakistan has a chance (for a civil nuclear deal) but it has to overcome some pretty serious roads. If there was a trial of AQ Khan and he was jailed, that would help."

A US-Pakistan deal could take several years to hammer out. The US-India agreement has not been not finalised, more than five years after negotiations began.
Link


India-Pakistan
LHC restores ban on AQ Khan's movement
2010-01-26
[The News (Pak) Top Stories] Justice Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry of the Lahore High Court adjourned hearing on Monday of the federal government's petition, praying to restrain nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan from media interaction and meeting people without security clearance, till February 3.

The judge deferred the hearing, as Barrister Syed Ali Zafar, counsel for the scientist, was not available. The court was informed that the counsel was out of the country so the matter should be adjourned. High Court, now defunct, which restricted the scientist from moving without security clearance and giving statements to the media.

In this petition, Dr Khan had already filed his reply negating the government's plea that he had been giving interviews to local or foreign media. He said it was merely an allegation that he had been in direct or indirect communication with any foreign journalist. The federation had taken a plea that different foreign journalists in their articles had written that they were in communication with Dr AQ Khan. It said that Dr Khan should either deny or admit the claims made by foreign journalists. Soofi pleaded that the matter being of utmost importance and relating to the national security deserved to be investigated thoroughly.

Link


India-Pakistan
Remembering Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
2009-04-05
By Major (retd) Muhammad Arif Thaheem

Thirty years ago on April 4, 1979, the brightest star of Pakistan died a cruel death at the hands of the state, but decades later, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s presence is still unquestionably lingers around us.

Despite being hanged for murdering Ahmed Raza Kasuri, a political opponent, Bhutto is widely hailed as the most loved leader of Pakistan after Mohammad Ali Jinnah. Had it not been for his outstanding vision, Pakistan would be without any political standing in the world. Today, few can remember who passed the order for Bhutto’s death, but no one has forgotten the monumental changes Bhutto brought to the country while he was alive.

The order condemning Bhutto to death was a controversial one at the time, with judges and lawyers from all over the world condemning the courts of Pakistan. Finally, after all these years, the court officials who sentenced him to death have started to admit they were wrong. The question people should have been asking at the time was, why would Bhutto want Ahmed Raza Qusuri killed in the first place? If Bhutto had wanted anyone dead, surely he would have targeted better known leaders such as Mufti Mehmood, Wali Khan, Asghar Khan, Maulana Maududi or Ghaus Baksh, rather than Qusuri, a relatively unknown entity.

But 30 years on, there is little to be gained by mulling over what could have been. Bhutto’s achievements deserve far more importance than his tragic, untimely death. It was Bhutto who gave the poorer class their rights, and Bhutto who gave the nation courage to fight against cruelty and injustice. Any welfare work being done in the country today can trace its roots back to the Bhutto administration.

As Foreign Minister under Ayub Khan, Bhutto’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s defeat in the 1965 war against India marked the end of his association with the government. If Bhutto had second thoughts about his resignation, they were all wiped away when he saw how ecstatic the people of the country were at the stand he had taken against dictatorship. It became clear to him that he should remain in the world of politics.

The years following the 1965 war were a depressing time for Pakistan, but before long, Bhutto began boosting the morale of the entire nation with his passionate speeches. Here was a man the people could relate to, a fact that became clear when he won the 1970 elections.

It must be said that he did not come in to power at the best of times. When Bhutto took over, the country had just been split into two and was deeply insecure. While any other leader may have quailed under the pressure, Bhutto used the situation to his advantage. His presence in the government marked the time when the poor finally felt secure and so-called spiritual leaders and feudal lords lost their standing. In 1974, he formed and chaired the first Islamic Conference, which all the Islamic countries of the world were invited to attend. Such a move did not appeal to imperialist forces, whose biggest fear was that those countries that were economically and politically dependent on them would no longer be under their control. Nevertheless, Bhutto’s vision united third world countries and opened up opportunities for them in the world of trade.

Back in his own country, Bhutto finalised the constitution, which is followed to date despite the efforts of various subsequent dictators to change it. His many other achievements include signing the Steel Mill agreement with the USSR and about bringing educational reforms. With his vision, the Allama Iqbal Open University and the Quaid-e-Azam Univeristy in Islamabad came into being, and all at once, higher education became a possibility for many who could not have afforded it otherwise.

The fate of the Pakistanis who sacrificed themselves during the 1965 war clearly played on Bhutto’s mind, for soon after coming into power, Bhutto signed the Simla Agreement with India, reclaiming all the areas that had been captured and bringing home 90,000 Pakistani prisoners of war.

At the same time, he strove to put Pakistan on the map by acquiring atomic weapons. The seeds of such ambitions had been formed back when he was Foreign Minister after Pakistan had been defeated in the 1965 war and later in an official meeting with the country’s atomic scientists, he voiced his dream to make Pakistan a ‘nuclear power’.

“Even if we have to starve, we will have atomic power,” he famously boasted in 1965 as foreign minister.

Bhutto did not forget his vow. To that end, he established the Pakistan Energy Commission and inaugurated the Karachi Nuclear Power Plant in 1972. Charged with electric enthusiasm, he recalled atomic scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan back into the country from Holland, who in turn personally informed the Prime Minister that he would remain in Pakistan and not leave until he had set up a uranium plant.

But Bhutto’s lofty ambitions proved to be his undoing. His plans to purchase nuclear technology from France were thwarted by US President Jimmy Carter, and in August 1977, as soon as he learnt of Pakistan’s escalating plans for nuclear power, US Foreign Minister Henry Kissinger threatened Bhutto to halt his all work on atomic weapons. As Ata-ul-Haq Qasmi wrote in his column, “Bhutto is being punished not for his crimes but for his deeds.”

Bhutto’s life started unraveling rapidly soon afterwards when he was arrested for the murder of Ahmed Raza Kasuri. Even though it is unclear whether those charges were ever proven, he paid the price for it and was hanged almost a decade after he began to heal Pakistan after everything the country had suffered.

No one can deny that Bhutto made mistakes, but no one should forget the lengths he went to for his country. Bhutto’s achievements far outweigh his blunders, and had he lived, he may well have ensured Pakistan a prosperous future it sorely lacks today.

The writer is a reciepient of Tamgha-e-Imtiaz (Military)
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistan wants no-strings aid from US
2009-02-08
LONDON: The Obama administration should provide aid to Pakistan without any strings attached, Pakistan's ambassador to the US said in a newspaper interview published on Saturday.

Husain Haqqani told the Financial Times (FT) "assistance that is conditional is never good". His comments came after US Vice President Joe Biden said on Friday the Obama administration would revive a plan to send $1.5 billion of military aid to Pakistan, its key ally in the fight against Taliban forces in Afghanistan.

The US reportedly wants to triple civilian aid but impose conditions to ensure military assistance to Pakistan goes towards fighting insurgents in Afghanistan, not building up defences against India.

Biden was expected to give the first fully-fledged picture of Obama-era US foreign policy at a security conference in Munich, Germany later on.

"Our advice has been that while we can always discuss what the Americans would prefer... (conditional aid) is not going to serve US or Pakistani interests."

Haqqani pledged Pakistan would focus on fighting its "primary threat", which he said currently comes from "terrorism and not from our eastern neighbour". But he warned: "There is no bullet that has been invented that Pakistan can be given to shoot at the terrorists that cannot be used in case there is a war with India."

Following the release of nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan on Friday, Haqqani said his freedom "may cause a short-term perception problem" though added: "Pakistan now has a genuinely independent judiciary and we have dismantled the AQ Khan network
Link


Africa North
'Libya got N-technology from Dr AQ Khan'
2008-09-12
Libya did not get nuclear warhead documents from China but from Pakistani nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan's supplier network, Washington Times reported on Thursday, quoting a United States State Department official on condition of anonymity.

China gave Pakistan nuclear weapons technology and equipment in the 1980s as part of a strategic effort to counter India's nuclear weapons. Dr Khan then took the Chinese documents and supplied them to Libya as part of a package provided by his private nuclear supplier network. Iran and North Korea, also Dr Khan's customers, the official was quoted as saying.

The documents are now stored in a secret vault at the Energy Department's Oak Ridge, Tennessee, facility along with other nuclear equipment given up by the Libyans.

The documents were described as large blueprints that technically are considered primitive and are incomplete but explain how to develop a nuclear device small enough to fit on the tip of a missile. If the Libyans had tried to detonate a nuclear device based on the design, they likely would have caused a serious accident, US officials told Washington Times.

Chinese embassy spokesman Wang Baodong said the issue of the documents was "delicate" but that he had no knowledge of whether the matter was investigated by the Chinese government.

A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said in 2004 that the government was concerned about reports of the documents found in Libya and was trying to learn more.
Link


India-Pakistan
No country can intervene in Pak nuclear plan: FO
2008-07-29
Pakistan is not a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and as such, the group has no say in Pakistan's nuclear programme or its assets, Foreign Office spokesman Muhammad Sadiq said on Monday.

He told a weekly media briefing that the country had no relationship with the group. He said Pakistan's nuclear assets were fully secure and "followed the best international practices". Referring to the investigation into Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan's alleged role in nuclear proliferation, he said the issue's relevance to foreign policy had been resolved several years ago. Recent statements in the media were only important in a domestic context, he added.

The spokesman said the country needed energy and civilian nuclear power plants would help in that regard. "Pakistan is interested in co-operating with other countries to produce nuclear power under the proper safeguards," he said. Referring to the nuclear deal between India and the United States, the spokesman said that Pakistan's stance on the matter was clear. The country's national security interests were supreme and the government would do whatever was necessary to protect them, APP reported him as saying.
Link


India-Pakistan
Breaking the silence on Pakistan and terrorism
2008-07-20
By Con Coughlin

The biggest threat to the West is not al-Qa'eda, Afghanistan or Iran, but the country that, thanks to its laxity, has become the terrorists' chief hideout and breeding ground
It is not laxity. It is state policy. In 1947, the year it was created, Pakistan raised a jihadi militia and invaded Kashmir. The Pashtun tribals were so busy looting, even pausing to rape some Catholic nuns, that the Indians had time to send their own troops and take Srinagar. In 1965, there was Operation Gibralter, where Pakistan trained a jihadi militia and infiltrated them across the LOC along with regular Pak troops in disguise. They were supposed to provoke a rebellion. The locals reported them to the Indian army which sent its tanks across the international border deep into Pakistan proper. In 1999, they sent another group of jihadis, along with SSG commandos and the Northern Light Infantry across of the LOC to seize the Kargil heights. They were supposed to cut off the highway, allowing Pakistan to seize the region. A local shepherd reported the intrusion and the Indian army blasted them with hundreds of 155mm artillery guns, then sending in mountain warfare troops to remove them from the mountain peaks.
It's the threat to world peace that dares not speak its name.
In the early 80s the Pakistanis funded, trained and infiltrated Sikh terrorists in their Khalastani campaign. They blew up a 747 over the Irish sea. After the 1993 bombing of the Mumbai stock exchange, India recovered an unexploded bomb. The timer was US military issue - from a batch given to the Pakistan Army. In 1989, as the Afghan jihad was being wound down, Pakistan began training jihadis for war in Indian Kashmir. The Indian army has seized enough ordinance from dead jihadis to equip two complete army divisions.
We hear plenty about the dangers posed to our security by al-Qa'eda, Afghanistan and Iran. But when it comes to talking about the country that arguably constitutes the greatest threat to our everyday wellbeing, Pakistan hardly ever seems to merit a mention.

This is rather surprising, given that if you talk to any of the military commanders or politicians responsible for prosecuting the war against Islamist terrorism, Pakistan is the country that is almost universally identified as constituting the most serious active threat to our national security.

And it is also seen as the greatest obstacle to our efforts to combat the pernicious threat of jihad by terrorism.

Last week, the subject came up in conversations I had with one of our leading military commanders and a senior politician who is personally involved in the defence of the realm. About the only response I could evoke from my military acquaintance when I raised the thorny issue of Pakistan was a deep sigh and a shrug of the shoulders. "Ah yes, Pakistan," he said with a world-weary sigh. "A multitude of problems with no obvious solutions."

As for the politician, I was curious as to why the Government seems to have imposed a news blackout on making any statement that might be deemed critical of the Pakistani government. "The fact is, the country is teetering on the precipice of total collapse, and we don't want to be the ones to push it over the edge."

Indeed, the idea of Pakistan replicating the near-anarchy that prevails across the border in Afghanistan is almost too terrifying to contemplate.

While coalition forces have enjoyed much success in eradicating the operational infrastructure of the Taliban and al-Qa'eda in southern Afghanistan, they are deeply frustrated by the fact that the terrorists have simply been allowed to regroup and rebuild across the border in Pakistan's lawless tribal areas.

British military commanders last week told The Sunday Telegraph that the five-fold increase in roadside bomb attacks in southern Afghanistan was the result of the training that Taliban fighters were receiving at religious schools in Pakistan, where they are being taught to make explosives and build improvised explosive devices.

And while al-Qa'eda is not the force it was when it carried out the September 11 attacks, Western intelligence experts believe the core of al-Qa'eda's leadership - possibly including Osama bin Laden himself - is based in the inhospitable mountain ranges of Waziristan in Pakistan, where they continue to plot their diabolical schemes to attack the West.

To this potent Taliban/al-Qa'eda terrorist mix has now been added the new ingredient of Pakistan's home-grown Islamist radicals, which Western security experts call the Pakistani Taliban to distinguish them from their Afghan neighbours.

The Pakistani Taliban is made up of indigenous Muslims who have been radicalised in one of the hundreds of Saudi-funded madrassahs, which openly preach that young Muslims have an obligation to wage Jihad against the infidels of the West.

Nearly all the major terror plots against Britain - both those that succeeded, such as the July 7 bombings, and those that have been foiled by the vigilance of our security services - have been linked in some way to Pakistan.
We've noticed that, as have some smart Brits, but the gummint there seems to be going out of its way not to notice ...
The emergence of a new, home-grown terrorist organisation in Pakistan has dramatically increased the threat the country poses to Britain.

As if this wasn't enough to give us all sleepless nights, Pakistan is the only Muslim country known to possess a nuclear weapons arsenal.

So long as President Pervez Musharraf remains the country's titular head, the West has some degree of assurance that Pakistan's nukes remain secure for, in his former capacity as the head of Pakistan's armed forces, Musharraf allowed US officials to make sure the necessary safeguards were in place to ensure the nukes did not fall into the wrong hands.

Al-Qa'eda's training manuals make no secret of the fact that the organisation would love to get its hands on a nuclear device, and the only two likely places it could do this are Pakistan and Iran.

Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan, the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear weapons arsenal, spent the Nineties making a tidy profit from hawking his nuclear-bomb blueprints to some of the world's less stable regimes, and North Korea, Libya and Iran were among some of the more notorious beneficiaries.

Although Dr Khan was placed under house arrest after his activities were exposed by Western intelligence agencies in 2002, Pakistan's new coalition government, bowing to nationalist pressure, has indicated it is prepared to rehabilitate the disgraced nuclear scientist, even though the West is still struggling to come to terms with the consequences of his clandestine nuclear proliferation network.

This is just one of several disturbing developments to emerge from Pakistan since the new coalition government took power earlier this year, in reaction to the West putting pressure on Mr Musharraf to return the country to democratic rule. At the time, both London and Washington believed that Pakistan having a democratic government would increase its co-operation in fighting terrorism. In fact, the opposite appears to have happened.
Since most Paks, whatever their affiliation, agree with the terrorists: Pakistain is the land of the pure, there are infidels everywhere, and it's necessary to have jihad. The Paks won't allow themselves to be 'surrounded', won't allow Tajiks and Uzbeks to run Afghanistan, and won't allow Kashmir to go its own way. Doesn't matter who's in charge in Islamabad.
Pakistan was created by Indian Muslims who did not want to live in a democratic state where there would be one man, one vote. When they didn't get their way, they created their own country and built a new capital - Islamabad - The city of Islam, complete with its Mughal-Stalanist architecture. Even then there was the hope that India would soon break up and Pakistan, and its share of the British Indian Army, would dominate the weaker states of the subcontinent. For Pakistan to live in peace with its neighbors, especially India, requires Pakistanis to accept that they will not rule the subcontinent, that they will be dominated militarily, culturally, economically by non-Muslims. It requires Pakistanis to give up all hope of being the equal or better of India. That violates their concept of Islam. For Allah promised that the Muslims would conquer, that all would fall under the sway of Islam. If this is not the case, then what the Koran promised is incorrect. Pakistan might as well not exist. They might as well not be Muslims. Such a thing is far too traumatic. Hence we have perpetual jihad.
The West might have been frustrated by what it perceived as Mr Musharraf's lack of commitment to rooting out terror groups in Waziristan, but at least while he was directly running the country there were sporadic bouts of activity. But talk to any of the military commanders involved with prosecuting the war against the Taliban and al-Qa'eda, and they will tell you that Pakistani co-operation has virtually ground to a halt since the coalition government took control.

Until now, the West has maintained a discreet silence about its concerns regarding Pakistan's lack of commitment to rooting out Islamist terror cells, hoping that the new government in Islamabad can be persuaded to mend its ways. But the West's mounting frustration is unlikely to be contained for much longer.

Barack Obama, the Democrat presidential nominee, last week became the first leading Western politician to voice his frustration with Islamabad when he declared that he would have no hesitation in ordering American troops to pursue terror suspects across the Pakistani border "if Pakistan cannot or will not act".

The Pakistanis ignore this shot across their bows at their peril.
The Paks are going to bet on the fact that Barack Obama is an empty suit, and they may be right. Obama can talk tough about a country that's far away, but if he's willing to back down in Iraq, why would the Paks believe he'll be tough on them?
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More