Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Lebanon: Tensions between Hezbollah and Future Movement Escalate
2010-09-23
[Asharq al-Aswat] The situation in Lebanon continues to be a source of concern, domestically, regionally, and internationally, particularly in light of the escalation between Hezbollah and some of its allies on one side, and the Future Movement and some of its allies, on the other. Despite efforts to dispel the climate of tension that has existed between the two sides since the events of 7 May 2008 [resulting in Hezbollah seizing control of section of West Beirut from Future Movement militia], the political discourse from both parties' remains inflammatory, and a campaign of escalation continues.

Following a meeting with Lebanese Foreign Minister Ali al-Shami in which the discussion touched upon the recent deterioration and the ongoing tension in Lebanon, the United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Michael Williams, expressed concerns about stability in Lebanon. Williams said that "this issue has generated some concern for Lebanon's stability. The United Nations continues to believe that any differences should be resolved through calm and rational dialogue between all sides, and through the work of Lebanon's state institutions." Williams also said that President Michel Suleiman Foreign Minister Ali al-Shami's upcoming trip to the UN General Assembly presents an important opportunity for Lebanon, as this will be "an opportunity to discuss the implementation of [UN] Security Council Resolution 1701."

Future Movement MP Ahmed Fatfat told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Future Movement "is not responsible for the political storm that is being witnessed by Lebanon, but was only responding to the attacks being made against it." Fatfat also confirmed that "the Future Movement has principles that it will never give up, most importantly is the international tribunal for Lebanon."

MP Ahmed Fatfat also clarified to Asharq Al-Awsat that "Prime Minister Saad Hariri -- in a statement he made during a meeting of the Future Movement the day before yesterday [Monday], pledged not to withdraw his support for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, even if this costs him the premiership or puts his security at risk...at the same time he [also] pledged his support towards good bilateral relations with Syria, and the Lebanese state project." Fatfat added that "the issue of calm is to do with the other party [Hezbollah] as that is where the escalation is coming from."

Answering a question about Syria's position towards what is happening in Lebanon, especially as one of the party's involved in this escalation is a Syrian ally, Fatfat told Asharq Al-Awsat "Let's be clear, the Syrian regime does what is in its interests and the interests of its country, while we as Lebanese, must work for the interests of our country. It is certain that some in Lebanon are upset about opening a new page with Damascus, but we will not allow them to disturb this relationship." He added that "Lebanese parties affiliated to Syria are not in favor of what is happening, and there is a picture printed in the mind, that Jamil Sayyed began an attack (on Hariri and the Future Movement) after his meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, and that Aoun opened fire after his son-in-law Minister Gibran Bassil also met with al-Assad, and that in effect Syria is doing what it wants, [however] we have not felt anything negative from Syria."

Fatfat also told Asharq Al-Awsat that "the message that Prime Minister Saad Hariri will send to the people of Lebanon...will involve a number of issues, and this includes sticking to his fundamental principles, and at the forefront of this is the international tribunal, as well as committing to his allies, the [Lebanese] state, and to the bilateral relations between Lebanon and Syria."

For his part, Future Movement MP Ammar Houri welcomed "the return to calm discourse" adding that "we are advocates of calm...and democratic discourse." Following Hezbollah's enthusiastic reception of General Jamil Sayyed at Beirut airport, and the press conference that Sayyed conducted from there, MP Ammar Houri said that the Future Movement "hoped that Hezbollah would have commented on what Sayyed said about the Prime Minister, but [Hezbollah] avoided any discussions of what happened at the airport."

As for the Ministerial Statement that was put forward by Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, Future Movement MP Ammar Houri said that "the Future Movement has never reversed its commitment towards the Ministerial Statement...and we are committed to the full terms of the Ministerial Statement from the Special Tribunal for Lebanon to [the principles of] co-existence, peace, and calm." Houri also stressed that "the Ministerial Statement must avoid any political tensions." Houri also said that Prime Minister Hariri is committed to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, strong relations with Syria, and the statements he previously made to Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper in this regard.

Following his meeting with Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Boutros Sfeir, leader of the National Liberal Party MP Dory Chamoun announced that he regretted "the state's absence from the airport...which allowed for the holding of such a reception for somebody who is an outlaw." Chamoun also said that "we were hoping that the people who received Sayyed would have reached a degree of understanding to know that such behavior would have negative repercussions on the country as a whole." He added that "I am not afraid with regards to the issue of arms, because they used this in the past and they understood that this is unacceptable internally, and that the more they use force and flex their muscles whilst hiding behind their weapons, the more they expose the resistance."
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Chamoun hopes Berri will not be reelected
2009-03-17
National Liberal Party (NLP) leader Dory Chamoun said in an interview with Ash-Sharq newspaper published on Monday he hoped Speaker Nabih Berri would not be reelected, because "those who allow themselves to put the Parliament's key in their pocket for over a year should not be reelected."
But he will be, because that's the way things happen in an oligarchy. If he keels over dead tomorrow morning, there'll be another one just like him ready to take his place by the afternoon.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Feb. 14 Rally: A Show of Force Ahead of June Elections
2009-02-15
Until the Hezbies beat everyone up ...
Hundreds of thousands of Lebanese flocked to Beirut's Martyrs' Square on Saturday to mark the fourth anniversary of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri's assassination as Lebanon gears up for parliamentary elections. Demonstrators carried Lebanon's flag as well as party flags of Hariri's al-Mustaqbal Movement and political allies. Some held pictures of Hariri and his son and political heir, Saad Hariri.

Others had stickers reading "We won't forget you" on their shoulders. Giant screens showed pictures of the slain leader and a choir sang patriotic and Arab national songs.

The crowds fell silent around 1:00 p.m. to mark the time when Hariri was killed. The silence was interrupted only by the sound of church bells and the call for prayers from mosques in a show of Christian-Muslim unity. The slain leader was buried at al-Amin mosque that oversees Martyrs' Square, popularly renamed Freedom Square after Hariri's death.

Endless bus convoys poured into the capital coming from all around Lebanon to take part in the commemorative event. Entrances to the square were clogged with a sea of marchers.

The rally took place as final preparations are underway in The Hague for the launch of the international tribunal set up to bring Hariri's killers to justice.

It also came as the country prepares for legislative elections in June. Politicians of the March 14 alliance dedicated their speeches to Hariri and other figures killed in a series of blasts. The March 14 officials also promised victory in the June 7 elections and vowed "not to kneel."

"We move forward with the Lebanese towards the 7th of June -- Our date with free choice," Saad Hariri addressed the crowd from behind bullet-proof glass. "Parliamentary elections are fateful because they provide an opportunity to build a free state," he said.

"Today we stand at the threshold of the international tribunal," Hariri told the cheering crowd. "The hour of truth and justice has come and your voice will overcome that of the oppressors and we will know the truth."

Phalange Party leader Amin Gemayel said the elections will mark a "choice between our camp which wants freedom, sovereignty and independence and the other camp which wants a return to hegemony and foreign tutelage."

"We promise victory in the upcoming legislative elections," Gemayel told the rally.

"We shall never kneel," vowed Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea. "We shall achieve that last scene of the March 14 dream."

At Saturday's rally, there was also hope that Hariri's killers could eventually be brought to trial, as the international tribunal prepares to begin its work in The Netherlands on March 1.

In his speech, Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat vowed there will be "no compromise on the international tribunal."

Mustaqbal MP Bassem Sabaa and National Liberal Party leader Dory Chamoun also addressed the crowds. "Our hopes are pinned on you to continue the march. All martyrs are looking up to you … June 7 is coming up so don't put Cedars' martyrs down," Chamoun said.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The NLP Predicts Uprising Against Weapons
2008-08-02
The National Liberal Party on Friday criticized Iran's vice president for offering to swap Lebanon's stability for western approval of Tehran's nuclear program. "This exposes involvement by his revolution and its guards in Lebanon's affairs and changing it into an arena and a hostage subject to blackmail," the NLP said in a statement after the weekly meeting of its leadership under chairman Dory Chamoun.

It also criticized Hizbullah for breaching commitments made in line with the Doha Accord and for threatening to use its weapons to force other factions adopt decisions accepted by it. Such threats are "enough to condemn the weapons, be they divine or not, and are enough to spark a Lebanese uprising against your threats," the statement concluded.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Report: Syria to barter Hezbollah for Golan
2008-04-15
By Claude Salhani
This is originally from a UPI piece. I haven't found them particularly reliable, so salt to taste.
There are changes in the cards for the Middle East, predicts a Lebanese politician. Dory Chamoun, leader of the National Liberal Party, told this reporter that before there could be peace, there would be a new war between Israel and Syria; that Bashar al-Assad had a hand in former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri's assassination; and that Hezbollah's power in Lebanon -- already reduced to inducing traffic jams in downtown Beirut -- would suffer a new assault from Israel.

"The situation in the Middle East is not going to remain as it is," Chamoun said last week. "There is a peace process going on between Syria and Israel, which is on track. How to achieve it remains the question? It is a fact that the Golan Heights is to be divided. Israel wants part of the Golan Heights. This is something the old (former President Hafez) Assad refused."

Therefore, according to Chamoun, there will be a "mock-up war" between Syria and Israel. What exactly does he mean by a "mock-up war"? Chamoun explains: Syria will be allowed to reclaim, through this war, part of the Golan, while Israel continues to hold other parts. For the Syrians, it will be a great victory even though they would have to settle on less than the entire Golan.

And at the same time Israel will take advantage of the situation to hit Hezbollah once again; this time the Israelis will choose to fight in the Bekaa Valley, believes Chamoun. Israel hopes any peace deal with Syria includes a clause relating to Hezbollah and Hamas. "Israel might like to make peace with Syria, but with a promise from Syria to put an end to Hezbollah," he said.

He added that Hezbollah is getting weaker by the day. All it has achieved is to congest Beirut city center with its tents. At Hezbollah's instigation, thousands of Shiites have been camping in the refurbished city, an area of town badly damaged during the civil war and that was rebuilt thanks to Hariri. A billionaire who made his fortune in Saudi Arabia, Hariri was assassinated Feb. 14, 2005.

Speaking of Hariri, when asked if he knew who might be responsible for killing the former prime minister, Chamoun replied without hesitation, "Definitely the Syrians." He added that given the way regime works in Syria, the order had to come from the president, or at least he would know. "I don't think that anything of that magnitude could take place without Bashar knowing," said Chamoun.

Dory Chamoun, the son of former Lebanese President Camille Chamoun, said that dominating Lebanon is "a dream Syria has always had. All their regimes had an appetite to swallow up Lebanon. We are not going to allow it."

Syria, he said, tried making a deal during the first Gulf War, in 1990, when Hafez Assad, the father of the current Syrian president, saw an opportunity to conclude a deal with the Americans. "The old fox," said Chamoun, referring to Hafez Assad, "found an opportunity to make a deal with the Americans. He told them, 'I will be your ally against Saddam Hussein but in return I want Lebanon. I want to be able to use my air force and my navy in order to beat the (Christian Lebanese) resistance."

Chamoun, one of a half-dozen top Lebanese political figures to have had talks with administration officials, says that this time the White House appears "serious" regarding Lebanon. "The feedback is positive. Lebanon is on their agenda. They are earnest about wanting to help," said Chamoun. "For once, the United States is not going to trade Lebanon against something else to achieve some sort of peace with Syria," said Chamoun.

So what happens next January if the Democrats are in the White House? "I'm not worried because the policy on Lebanon is not guided by diplomacy; it is guided by security needs," Chamoun said.

And if the people in charge of the security of the United States decide that Lebanon must continue to be what it is today, then Lebanon must be safe and not fall into the hands of the Syrians. "Remember what happened when it was in the hands of the Syrians? All the worldwide terrorist organizations mushroomed in Lebanon. Again, I don't think they (the U.S.) can take the risk after 9/11," he said. "I think the whole strategy of the United States vis-a-vis our part of the world has changed 180 degrees. At one time the security frontiers of the United States used to be the oceans. Today the frontier goes all the way to Pakistan and Afghanistan. That sort of security policy, which the U.S. is following today, is going to be the guideline, whether they are Democrats or Republicans."
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Syria's price : Abolish Hariri tribunal & keep Hezbollah arms
2008-01-21
Huda al Husseini
Beirut - In Lebanon, there is a foundation called ‘Umm al Nour’; its main aim is to rehabilitate drug addicts. In today’s Lebanon, most politicians are addicted to destroying the country as long as their names remain in the “limelight”. What we need to do is admit all of these politicians to the Umm al Nour rehabilitation centre to treat them for this addiction. Their need for stronger doses of medication will increase simply because “Lebanon” is a somewhat rare drug that will soon run out. Therefore, they should either be treated or totally eliminated.

The Lebanese people, or at least some of them, are fed up of the exchanges of accusations and theories as well as the fact that their level of intelligence is insulted. Some say that they hope that Lebanon does not join the US-Saudi-Egyptian axis that some argue includes Israel. Others say that they do not want Lebanon to join the Iranian-Syrian axis. As a result of the numerous non-Lebanese affiliations, Lebanon has withered; President Hosni Mubarak was incorrect when he warned against the potential loss of Lebanon simply because Lebanon has already been lost and torn apart by political rivals. In fact, the strings of politicians are being pulled by foreign parties to the extent that it is difficult to patch up the major rift and it is from this rift that the Lebanese run away; whilst the competent Lebanese nation is running away from the future and stability.

When Iraq invaded Kuwait, the late Iraqi former president Saddam Hussein looked for a Kuwaiti with whom he could deal. Despite the fact that it is impossible that all Kuwaitis would be satisfied with their ruling regime, none of them were willing to greet the occupier. In Lebanon, few citizens refused to deal with Syria during its occupation of the country. Those few Lebanese citizens were persecuted by fellow Lebanese who supported the Syrian regime. Syria withdrew [from Lebanon] yet it kept within reach to ensure that Lebanon would not be able to rise without its help. When the Secretary General of the Arab League [Amr Moussa] visited Lebanon, he was asked about the role of Syria and answered saying, “I believe that it has a positive role.”

It is funny that the Secretary General would describe such role as positive. Let us summarize the issue: The solution to the Lebanese problem is present in Damascus and Damascus demands two conditions to solve the problem.
  • The first condition is to abolish the International Tribunal to prosecute the assassins of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

  • The second condition is to hold onto Hezbollah as a weapon and increase its accumulation [of arms].
If these conditions are met then Syria would be willing to allow even the Lebanese Forces leader Samir Gaegae or Dory Chamoun, head of the National Liberal Party to be nominated for the presidential post and will allow the supporting party to form the government. However, if this objective is not reached then Damascus will cause more problems for its Lebanese advocates to solve. Nowadays, there is talk about conducting new parliamentary elections or electing the president by popular vote.

Lebanese politicians know exactly what Damascus wants and seek to find a way around it however Damascus is much smarter. Arabs know what Damascus wants. Qatar knows this quite well and its foreign minister Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim heard these statements and wanted to report what he had heard to the military commander Michel Suleiman who will remain only a candidate for the presidential post.

Lebanese politicians know somewhat well, and so should the Arab League Secretary General that those who visit Damascus return with the impression that the Lebanese presidential election will not happen anytime soon and that Damascus is setting plans in place to face what it will be subjected to regarding the International Tribunal for a period of two months at least. It had also informed its Lebanese allies that it would not allow the International Tribunal to encroach upon its regime.

It is for this reason that General Michel Suleiman should adopt a decisive and open decision before his name withers away along with the last legitimate institution in Lebanon. Syria is no longer enthusiastic about his nomination; and if General Suleiman had his own informers amongst Lebanese politicians, they must have informed him of this and told him that the opposition is no longer comfortable with his selection.

From Beirut to Damascus there is news that the military commander had secretly visited Riyadh and covertly met with Samir Gaegae twice as well as the Druze leader Walid Jumblatt three times in secret and that he frequently meets with the Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and head of the Future bloc MP Saad Hariri behind closed doors. Perhaps none of this is true, however rumours will intensify and continue to spread to the extent that news is fabricated and his nomination will be used as a tool to exert pressure whilst in fact the truth is something else. The truth is that Syria wishes to abolish the International Tribunal and hold onto Hezbollah.

Therefore, in order to protect the military institution, the military commander should demand that his name be withdrawn from the political marketplace; these are dreams that do not deserve a man to have to lose his dignity. Let the politicians decide what comes first in the Lebanese constitution: the egg or the chicken. If they agree on the military commander then they can only go back to him after getting the green light from Damascus. The Lebanese politicians, oppositionists and supporters, hailed the “Arab initiative” as though it entailed an immediate “remedy” with the arrival of Amr Moussa despite the fact that his assistant Hesham Youssef clearly stated that Moussa will submit a report on the results of his mission at the meeting of Arab foreign ministers due to be held on January 27. As for Moussa, he appeared as somebody calling for the Lebanese to help him draft a positive report thus his status would be consolidated and this was clear as he said, “Solving the Lebanese crisis will have a positive impact upon the Arab status.”

The real irony lies in the limited role played by the Lebanese parliament speaker Nabih Berri who keeps setting dates for a session to be convened to elect a Lebanese president and then cancelling them. He said, “22 Arab and Muslim foreign ministers in the presence of the acting Lebanese Christian Foreign Minister Tariq Metri stated that they openly and unanimously wanted a strong Christian president in Lebanon (…). Arab unanimity in support of the president is a good sign and I support this decision. Perhaps the decision has surpassed the Taif Accords; however I support it as a way to end the Lebanese crisis,” (Radwan Aqeel - Annahar Newspaper -13 January 2008).

Has the parliament speaker forgotten that Lebanon was established as a homeland for Christians, namely Maronites. Arab foreign ministers should be aware of this fact; there was no need for sectarian incitement. No matter how Iran tried to prevent the eruption of the Shia-Sunni conflict, Syrian control of the Lebanese public is no longer guaranteed simply because public congestion has reached its peak. Another question: where is the president? The post has been vacant since November 24, 2007. The Syrians had informed the French of their “good will” as they prevented former President Emile Lahoud from forming an alternative government.

It is as though the problem in Lebanon focuses entirely on ministerial composition. Nabih Berri told his guests that he had seriously adopted the 10-10-10 idea in support of the “Maronite” president. On January 13, 2008, Annahar newspaper quoted Berri’s assertion of his statement to Moussa: “I swear to you Mr. Amr, I was going to start the parliament session in this case and over 95 MPs would have voted with me.”

When “honor” is involved in the Lebanese issue, there are no surprises; however Berri swore with all his honour that he could convene parliament whenever he wishes.

And because the decision does not lie in Lebanon, Amr Moussa is asked to spare himself the time and effort and should travel directly to Damascus and tell Syria that it cannot achieve everything [it wants]. Lebanon and its people are trying to free themselves from it and Damascus must adapt to that fact and reconsider the suggestions made by the Jordanian King Abdullah II when he met with the Syrian President Bashar Assad. King Abdullah II suggested that Syria cut ties with Iran despite that Iran had paid off Syria’s debts to Russia. The suggestions included benefits for Syria such as the retrieval of the Golan Heights, receiving international aid and slowing down the procedures of the International Tribunal. In return, Syria must sign a peace treaty with Israel (Syrian-Israeli meetings are running smoothly) and end its interference in Lebanon and its ties with Iran as well to stop supporting “Hamas” and “Hezbollah”. Amr Moussa should know that Syria is betting on the existing “conflict” between Washington and Tel Aviv. Whilst Washington is more in favour of establishing a dialogue with Tehran and isolating Damascus, Tel Aviv prefers negotiation with Damascus and continuing the state of animosity and pressuring Tehran. All that is left lies in one question: What exactly do Arabs want other than the Arab initiative?

Just as God protects the holy Kaaba, we pray that God protects Lebanon from its politicians and all foreign parties that are contending for the egotism of these politicians.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Sfeir uncommitted to ousting Lahoud from office
2005-11-02
Patriarch Nasrallah Butros Sfeir remained neutral about the presidency issue on Tuesday, during a busy day of meetings with numerous Christian politicians. Sfeir will preside Wednesday over the monthly meeting of the Maronite Bishops Council.

Dory Chamoun, the head of the National Liberal Party, said he was opposed to any nomination of a military figure to the presidency, adding that "[President Emile] Lahoud's extended presidency is not constitutional because he altered the Constitution to remain in power." Chamoun said Lahoud should resign before things get worse for the post of the presidency, and for the Maronite community that controls it. "The president is currently very isolated with no visitors coming to Baabda," he added. "This worsening situation will hamper the presidency and make it ineffective." According to Chamoun, Lahoud must learn from the history of his predecessors. "Former President Bshara Khoury, who was stronger and more popular than Lahoud, put the country's interest above his personal concerns and resigned," he said.

Metn MP Michel Murr said that he discussed the presidency and Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun's candidacy with Sfeir, but stressed that a presidential race will not be launched while Lahoud remains in office. "We always consult with the patriarch on all national issues and we believe he can act as a national reference because of his balanced and neutral positions regarding major issues," he said.

Murr supports Free Patriotic Movement Michel Aoun for the post, as "Aoun left the military a long time ago and has proven to be a popular politician. "Being a member of the Change and Reform bloc," he added, "I support Michel Aoun's stance that the president is neither ousted in the street nor by the Constitution. He can only resign if he wishes to do so." According to Murr, the patriarch will not nominate any specific candidate. "He stands at the same distance from all Christian leaders and figures," he said.

Asked about his family's ties to the president, Murr said his personal relations with Lahoud were stronger than his political bond. "Despite our close ties, which we value and respect highly, we might disagree on many political issues. Moreover, my son's views as a defense minister have nothing to do with being [Lahoud's] son-in-law." Murr also slammed the campaign to oust Lahoud from office as being "all wrong because those who launched it resorted to personal name-calling that made the president more stubborn in refusing to leave until the last day." However, he lauded the decision to let Christian leaders handle the presidency, despite "our strong belief the presidency belongs to all sects and religious groups." Murr also did not see any good coming from a Christian meeting with Sfeir to discuss the presidency, noting that not all Christians are Maronites.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Chamoun blames Syria for his brother
2005-04-26
The president of the National Liberal Party, Dory Chamoun, accused the Syrians of killing his brother Dany in 1990, not the jailed leader of the disbanded Lebanese Forces, saying: "I believe the Syrian brothers played the main role in the assassination," according to reports on Monday. Speaking during a rally on Sunday in the Southern town of Jezzine, Chamoun said: "The evidence upon which Samir Geagea was convicted was insufficient and impractical. My brother Dany and his family were murdered after the Syrians entered the eastern region."
Took you that long to notice, huh?... Oh. They're gone now. Makes things look different, doesn't it?
He added: "I demand a new investigation to reveal the real identity of the assassins." A Beirut supreme court had convicted Geagea of having masterminded Danny's assassination and gave him a death sentence that was commuted to life imprisonment.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
NLP reiterates demand for Syrian withdrawal
2004-06-12
National Liberal Party President Dory Chamoun said Friday that Syria has not yet delivered on its promises to withdraw from this country.
"I mean, it's been 30 years now..."
Commenting on Syrian President Bashar Assad's recent remarks saying that Syria would go along with whoever the Lebanese people choose as their president, the party accused Syria of saying something and doing another with regard to the withdrawal issue. "By linking the Syrian Army's presence in Lebanon with ... peace in the Middle East, Assad has made Lebanon, which is basically the only remaining Arab military front, a hostage by suffering alone the consequences of the confrontation with Israel," the NLP said. The NLP statement said that Assad's statements about Lebanon's presidential race and his need to see Lebanon on an equal footing with Syria amounted to an interference in Lebanon's internal affairs. "Syrian hegemony and patronage have created dependent and subordinate institutions in a way that Lebanon has been masquerading as an independent state while in reality its political and economic sectors are under the control of Syria," it said.
Hey! We've noticed that!
The party said that it was unacceptable to demand international legitimacy to be applied to Iraq and Palestine, while at the same timlutions [sic!] regarding the Blue Line and Shebaa Farms. "It is equally unacceptable to protest against foreign intervention in Iraq while overlooking open foreign (Syrian) intervention in Lebanon's domestic issues. In light of Assad's statements, we reiterate our demand for a Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon that has been footing the bill on behalf of all Arabs and is no more capable of continuing on the same path. ... We also stress the need for a healthy relation with Syria," the statement said.
Link


Syria-Lebanon
NLP urges Iraqis to unite and choose new government
2003-04-12
The National Liberal Party (NLP) said that it hoped the war in Iraq would be over soon, adding that Iraq should remain united no matter what the form of government selected for that country. In a statement issued by the party, after holding a meeting of its higher council headed by party president Dory Chamoun, the NLP said that it deplored the attacks that targeted journalists and civilians in Iraq. The NLP condemned last weekend’s attack against the McDonald’s restaurant in Dora and praised the authorities’ efforts in finding the network behind the bombing. The NLP called for “halting the random arrests that the authorities have been carrying out, with the aim of terrorizing, intimidating members of opposition groups and frustrating them enough to leave the country.”
Tough, being a western-style liberal in Syrian-occupied Lebanon, isn't it?
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-10 More