Europe |
Predictions for the German Economy Call for No Growth and Blaming Trump |
2025-04-24 |
[HotAir] Is there anything that man can't do? The forecasts are out for the moribund German economy - which suddenly and conveniently no one can remember was already in the toilet and has been circling for the past two years - and darned if they aren't downright gloomy. I mean, they're coloring it as 'down to zero' when it was only optimistically predicted to come in at around 0.3% growth at its best anyway. Shave and a haircut difference, but 'nothing, no growth, nada' is pretty dramatic when you've just sold your soul to the European Union for hundreds of billions of euros in debt service to be determined later. It's a brilliant bunch they have in charge in that country. Who might that be? Well, basically the same losers who got them in this pickle to begin with, only their precedence in a governing coalition has been shaken and stirred - that's all. The so-called 'right-wing' populist party, which came in second place and has been excluded from any say in what happens in Germany, looks more and more like Obi-Wan Kenobi with every round of polling. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) just keeps getting stronger as Friedrich Merz's Christian Democrats (CDU) and their coalition partners shiver and stumble along. Bad enough with all the broken campaign promises about immigration, debt brakes, and such things. Now there's not even a glimmer of hope on the horizon for some sort of economic resurgence to pull the Germans out of their self-induced economic coma. Did I say self-induced? Well, we can't have that, nor any accountability for the chaos and misery caused by Germany's dogged pursuit of climate cult madness. Let's simply say 'Trump did it to them' because you can bet your bippy they will. Darn Trump. ![]() But deteriorating conditions are also giving rise to fears that the CDU and fellow conspirators may be, in fact, desperate enough to try a move Merz said he wouldn't - banning the populist and very popular AfD. Blaming Trump isn't going to save them, and antsy coalition members know it. |
Link |
Europe |
German parties agree on coalition, but divisions over Israel may pull them apart |
2025-04-11 |
[IsraelTimes] While both the Christian Democrats and Social Democrats support the Jewish state, the future allies will need to find common ground on arms sales, UNRWA, an ICC warrant and more German election winner Friedrich Merz sealed a deal Wednesday to form a new government bringing together his conservative Christian Democratic Union-led bloc and the center-left Social Democrats ...every time you hear the phrase white people, white supremacy, whiteanything but paint, you're listening to a Democrat. Ask him/her/it to reimagine something for you; they do that a lot, though not well. They can hear a dog whistle a mile or two away. They invented the spoils system and Tammany Hall, and inspired the addition of the word (Thomas) Nastyto the English language. They want to stop continental drift and repeal the law of unintended side effects... , after accelerated negotiations reportedly driven by concerns over US trade tariffs and gaining far-right popularity. The deal aims to spur economic growth, ramp up defense spending, take a tougher approach to migration and catch up on long-neglected modernization, but behind the agreement lie policy divisions between the factions that could impact the future of Germany’s relationship with Israel, including military exports and funding for the UN agency for Paleostinian refugees, UNRWA. Before Merz can take the helm, the coalition deal needs approval in a ballot of the Social Democrats’ membership and by a convention on April 28 of Merz’s CDU, which ran in a joint bloc with the Christian Social Union party in Germany’s February 23 election. That election marked a significant rightward shift for the European Union ...the successor to the Holy Roman Empire, only without the Hapsburgs and the nifty uniforms and the dancing... ’s most populous country, with the far-right Alternative for Germany, or AfD, coming in second place with over 20 percent of the vote. The results left Merz with little choice but to deal with the Social Democrats, or SPD. He ruled out an alliance with the AfD, citing its ties to right-wing extremism, antisemitism, and racism. Recent polls showed the AfD gaining on CDU/CSU as talks dragged on, adding impetus for Merz to clinch an agreement quickly even if it meant papering over policy differences with SPD. Both the CDU/CSU and SPD have traditionally maintained support for Israel, though the latter has been more critical of Israeli government policies. "Historically, certain factions within the SPD have been more supportive of the Paleostinian cause and have taken a more critical stance toward Israel, particularly regarding its right-wing to far-right government," said Prof. Stephan Marschall, a senior political scientist at Heinrich Heine University. "On the other hand, [CDU/CSU] traditionally has aligned more closely with Israel’s security concerns." Experts warn that recent trends could widen that wedge, exacerbating tensions between Jerusalem and Berlin. "The fragile situation in Gazoo ...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppressionand disproportionate response... , coupled with Israel’s ongoing settlement policy, could reinforce the SPD’s critical stance toward the Israeli government and its actions," he told The Times of Israel. "This perspective challenges Germany’s traditionally strong and largely unconditional support for Israel, prompting debates over whether Berlin should adopt a more nuanced approach." GUNS AND BUTTER During negotiations, which had initially been slated to wrap up sometime after Easter, one of the most contentious issues between the parties regarded proposed reforms to Germany’s military export policy toward Israel. Currently, arms sales must be approved by the Federal Security Council, but CDU/CSU had sought to remove the hurdle as it pursues a relationship in which Israel’s security is a German "reason of state," a term used to denote Berlin’s special commitment to Israel in the wake of the Holocaust. "Lifting export restrictions on arms deliveries to Israel for self-defense could have resulted in much stronger military support," Marschall said. However, death is not the end. There remains the litigation over the estate... the SPD rejected the changes, insisting that military exports should remain subject to strict oversight, which some saw as a reflection of its reluctance to arm the Jewish state. In 2024, Merz accused Germany’s SPD-led government of halting arms exports to Israel. Though former chancellor Olaf Scholz denied any such policy, government data showed that arms exports to Israel fell by half from 2023 to 2024 and the reported halt in weapons sales fueled unease regarding SPD’s leadership among many in Germany’s Jewish community. "In terms of what we expected from Germany, there was quite a bit of disappointment, this included the UN votes, the secret embargo [on arms sales], and many other steps that disappointed people," said Jacob Horowitz, a former board member of the Jewish Student Union of Germany. The coalition agreement sealed Wednesday omits any mention of reforms to defense exports, indicating that Federal Security Council oversight will remain in place. However, death is not the end. There remains the litigation over the estate... Jeremy Issacharoff, a former Israeli ambassador to Germany, signaled confidence that defense trade between the countries would remain strong. "Agreements on major defense projects, such as the procurement of Arrow 3 from Israel and submarines from Germany, will likely continue," he said. The sides had also sparred over funding for UNRWA, which provides humanitarian aid ![]() ...Formerly inhabited by hardy Phoenecian traders, its official language is now Arabic, with the usual unpleasant side effects.... In 2023, Germany was the second largest donor to the agency behind the US, sending it over $200 million. In January 2024, Berlin joined others in suspending aid after Israel published evidence showing that several UNRWA employees had taken part in the October 7, 2023, Hamas ![]() attack, but restored the funding months later. The SPD has supported continuing funding for UNRWA and even condemned Israel’s decision to pass laws attempting to curtail the agency’s activities in the West Bank and Gaza. But the CDU/CSU has raised concerns about keeping the spigot on, citing the UN agency’s alleged antisemitism and links to the Hamas terror group. Wednesday’s agreement contains something of a compromise on the issue, conditioning future support on "comprehensive reforms," but leaving significant room for ambiguity on what those reforms may entail. Marschall predicted that Germany’s support for UNRWA would likely remain unchanged under Merz. "Germany had a strong commitment to multilateralism and the role of the United Nations ...where theory meets practice and practice loses... , which suggested that, despite the discussion, support for UNRWA was unlikely to be fully withdrawn," he said. TWO-STANCE DANCE Issacharoff emphasized that both parties are committed to Israel’s security, in official positions repeatedly voiced by their leaders. But he warned that ties could fray in response to actions by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing government, should it pursue moves that undermine a two-state solution to the Israeli-Paleostinian conflict, such as advocating for the annexation of Gaza or expanding Israeli authority in the West Bank Such tensions, he noted, "could... create significant challenges for the new German chancellor." The coalition agreement includes a commitment to continue pushing for Paleostinian statehood, which had been a central SPD demand. "The viable perspective for peaceful coexistence between Israelis and Paleostinians is a negotiated two-state solution," the text reads. Responsibility for Germany’s foreign affairs will fall to the CDU; both candidates for foreign minister are considered to have strong pro-Israel records. SPD’s Boris Pistorius, also considered a strong friend of Israel, will stay on in his role as Germany’s defense chief. The CDU’s hold on the Foreign Ministry will likely be viewed as good news for Netanyahu. On February 24, a day after coming in first place in the election, Merz sparked controversy by inviting Netanyahu to Germany, publicly stating that the prime minister would not be arrested despite a warrant issued by the International Criminal Court on war crimes charges related to the fighting in Gaza. Following the invite, SPD leaders and other politicians accused Merz of disregarding international law, another point of contention in the coalition talks. "Respect for international law is a key concern for all parties involved in the coalition talks and has been explicitly emphasized in the draft version of the coalition agreement—especially at a time when a major democratic global power such as the United States has questioned aspects of international law," Marschall said. "Regarding the Middle East, the central debate is about whether, and to what extent, the Israeli government is violating international law." What remains to be seen is to what extent the coalition agreement will actually guide German policy toward Israel, especially on particularly sticky issues like settlements and the war in Gaza. In these cases, compromise was reached by "softening the language in the final agreement while maintaining key buzzwords," said Marschall. "This allowed both sides to uphold their positions without jeopardizing the broader coalition negotiations." |
Link |
Europe |
Why Germany is ripe for revolt |
2025-02-23 |
[SpikedOnline] The German elites were wrong about everything. As Germany’s federal elections approach this weekend, chancellor Olaf Scholz and his Social Democrats (SPD) are bracing for their worst results since 1887. The SPD is battling with its equally unpopular coalition partner, the Green Party, for a humiliating third place, behind the conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) and the right-populist Alternative for Germany (AfD). ![]() The coming bloodbath for Scholz’s government speaks to far more than the haplessness of his leadership or the unpopularity of his party. Germany has just endured two years of recession — the longest economic slump in its postwar history. Industry is in freefall, shedding almost a quarter of a million manufacturing jobs since the start of the pandemic. A series of terror attacks by Islamists and asylum seekers has made many Germans wonder if the state can do its basic duty to keep them safe. Talk of German efficiency and punctuality now sounds like a sarcastic joke, as roads and bridges fall into disrepair, trains are routinely late and infrastructure projects are plagued by delays and cost overruns. One in five German children lives in poverty. Germany is not merely in an economic downtown — it faces a profound structural crisis, largely of its elites’ own making. None of these problems began in earnest in the Scholz era. The chancellor is merely the current frontman for a long-running ’consensus’ that has now become unsustainable and unsupportable. Tellingly, at the last federal elections in 2021, Scholz campaigned as the continuity candidate following the long reign of CDU chancellor Angela Merkel, under whom he served as vice-president and finance minister in a ’grand coalition’. He even aped her signature ’Merkel rhombus’ hand gesture to ram this point home. The accusation that ’politicians are all the same’ rings far truer in Germany than elsewhere. Every mainstream party is implicated in this crisis. Foreign admirers of Germany praise the ability of its politicians to form a consensus, rather than squabble or try to score partisan points. This is what makes Germany a ’grown-up country’, as John Kampfner puts it in his staggeringly poorly aged 2021 book, Why the Germans Do it Better. A less charitable interpretation of contemporary German politics would be that its leaders are gripped by groupthink. Policies, ideologies, ways of doing things become easily entrenched. The result is that when the ideas of the day are bad, they are shared not only across parties, but also by the broader elites, in business, media and culture. The main challenge to this received wisdom comes from the fringes, and so it can comfortably be ignored. Not even a change of governing party will necessarily lead to a change of course. Long read at the link... |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
The hunt for 'Russian spies' in the Baltics reaches a new level |
2025-01-22 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Victor Lavrinenko [REGNUM] Spy mania is not abating in the Baltics. In recent weeks, new information has been received related to the cases of "Russian spies" caught in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The bona fides of these cases raise serious doubts, but they fulfill their main function. This kind of news helps to keep local Russian communities in fear. In a situation where no one is sure that he or she will not be declared the next "spy", few dare to loudly protest against the policy of oppression. "Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!" EXPLOSIVES IN THE GARAGE The Riga Regional Court recently sentenced a 72-year-old Russian citizen who permanently resides in Latvia to eight years in prison. The man's name has not been released, but it is known that he once served in the Soviet Army. After Latvia left the USSR, the retired officer, like over 700,000 other Russian speakers living there, did not receive local citizenship - and then he applied for Russian citizenship. He was detained on December 20, 2023 - the Latvian State Security Service opened a criminal case on "espionage in favor of the Russian Federation", the LETA agency reported, citing the prosecutor's office. According to the prosecutor's office, the man " received publicly available information about political processes in Latvia, critical infrastructure and military facilities in the area of the Riga airport, and also inspected the area around the 17th battalion of the Zemessardze (local territorial militia. - Ed. Regnum )." It is alleged that the man passed this information on to a representative of Russian intelligence, who personally came to meet him in Kaliningrad. The Latvian prosecutor's office admits that it was "difficult for them to determine the specific volume of information transmitted," since " the espionage was carried out over a long period of time, and the defendant transmitted the information he received by personally visiting the Russian Federation." It is also claimed that explosives were found in the pensioner’s garage: a hexogen briquette weighing 975 grams and four TNT briquettes with a total weight of 759.4 grams, as well as 136 rounds of ammunition. The details voiced raise questions. Why would a Russian intelligence officer need to meet with a pensioner for the sake of “publicly available information about political processes in Latvia”? After all, this same information can be obtained from the Internet. And the stories about explosives found on the pensioner are vividly reminiscent of other similar cases that have taken place in recent years. Thus, in 2002, the Latvian secret police accused opposition activist Vladimir Linderman (an associate of Eduard Limonov ) of preparing an assassination attempt on then-President Vaira Vike-Freiberga. They presented 200 grams of TNT and two detonator caps, allegedly hidden by Linderman in his armchair at home. The activist took refuge in Russia, but in 2008 Linderman was extradited to Latvia – in the spirit of the Russian Federation’s understanding of the “good-neighborliness policy” at that time. However, the evidence presented against the opposition activist turned out to be so thin that the Latvian court acquitted Linderman in 2009. True, back then the times were much freer than now. In 2017, a case was opened in Latvia against opposition journalist Yuri Alekseyev, editor of the Imhoclub portal, who had long been an eyesore for officials. He was accused, among other things, of illegal possession of ammunition. Alekseyev himself claimed that the cartridges were planted on him - and indeed, his fingerprints and genetic material were not found on them. The Latvian court initially decided to remove these cartridges from the indictment, but pressure from above came, and they appeared there again. Alekseyev, who was also accused of writing anti-Latvian comments on the Internet and “possessing child pornography” (photos of the journalist’s children bathing were considered child pornography), recently fled to Belarus. According to Alekseyev himself, they wanted to jail him for up to ten years. The stories of Linderman and Alekseev give reason to doubt the integrity of the case opened against the still unknown pensioner - if in order to finally "drown" him, it was necessary to resort again to such a trick as the alleged explosives found on him. It is also worth noting that on January 28, a Latvian court will begin hearing the cases of two more people accused of espionage. The first of them is Riga taxi driver Sergei Sidorov, who was caught in correspondence with several political emigrants from Latvia who created the Telegram channel “Anti-Fascists of the Baltics” in Russia. Sidorov sent them photos of objects like the Riga airport or the seaport, taken from angles accessible to everyone. The second is Latvian Svetlana Nikolaeva, who brought Sidorov money for a lawyer from his sister, who lives in Russia. The seriously ill Nikolaeva is effectively deprived of access to medical care and is slowly dying in a Latvian prison. According to investigators, Sidorov and Nikolaeva illegally collected and transmitted to Russia undisclosed information about other suspected spies who are in custody in Latvia. THE MYSTERIOUS STORY OF EDUARD MANOVAS In December last year, Lithuanian special services reported the capture of a "Russian spy". The corresponding suspicion was brought against 82-year-old Eduards Manovas. Manovas, who holds dual Russian-Lithuanian citizenship, was an activist of the conservative party "Fatherland Union - Lithuanian Christian Democrats" (SO-KhDL), which lost power in the country as a result of the autumn elections. In addition, Manovas is a member of the influential Union of Political Prisoners and Exiles in the country. This is due to the fact that he was born into a family of Lithuanian residents who were deported by the Soviet government at the time - and in recent years he actively indulged in memories of his childhood in exile: he communicated with the press and wrote memoirs. Manovas was interested in artistic photography, and his native Šiauliai regularly hosted exhibitions of his works. Information about them was removed from Lithuanian websites. Apparently, Manovas was ruined by the fact that he himself lived in Russia for many years, owned an apartment in Moscow, received a Russian pension, and his adult children live here to this day. The pensioner often visited them, traveled around Russia, including to Crimea. As it turned out, Eduards Manovas was arrested back in early 2024, but the arrest was kept secret for a long time. The Šiauliai branch of the SO-KhDL, having learned about the arrest of a colleague, expelled him from the organization. The Lithuanian State Security Department (DSD) claims that some “complex equipment for receiving and transmitting information” was found in Manovas’s home in Šiauliai. But at the same time, according to the deputy director of the State Security Department, Remigijus Bridikis, the suspect was not collecting any top-secret data. According to the department, he sent to Moscow the information that could be gleaned from the Lithuanian media - about foreign and domestic policy, exercises, the activities of local political parties, and the same Union of Political Prisoners and Exiles. Bridikis claimed: "He worked for Russian military intelligence as part of the Illegals program. It is quite exceptional because it is quite expensive, complex, requires a lot of resources, work and preparation. Usually in such cases, sensitive information is collected, especially relevant for Russia." At the same time, it is completely unclear what kind of “sensitive and completely relevant” information Manovas collected, which, if desired, cannot be found in Lithuanian open sources. At the same time, the Lithuanian press was fed with a version that Manovas was not real, but an illegal immigrant abandoned in Russia who stole someone else’s identity. As evidence, they cite a questionnaire filled out by Manovas in 2011, when he ran for the Šiauliai City Council. It states that he studied to be a journalist at the Lviv Humanitarian University. However, since an educational institution with that name never existed, the whistleblowers suspected that Manovas actually graduated from the Lviv Higher Military-Political School, where Soviet military journalists were trained. And it is assumed that before returning to Lithuania in 1997, he worked in Russia in this very specialty. Additional suspicions arose because no information was found in the archives about the exile Eduard Manovas, born in 1942. However, Eduard Manovas, born in 1941, was found, who was exiled with his parents in 1945 to Tajikistan and died there. There was a suggestion that Russian intelligence could have used the deceased child’s data to construct the “legend” of their intelligence officer. The Union of Political Prisoners rebelled against these speculations. The head of this organization, Gvidas Rutkauskas, believes that Manovas, when filling out the election questionnaire, could have simply made a mistake in the name of the educational institution. In the worst case, he could have deliberately distorted the name of the Lviv Higher Military-Political School in order to get rid of the "stain" on his biography. But this is not such a big crime. Former exiles have no doubt that Manovas is the same Manovas. His family was well known in Šiauliai. In particular, Eduard had a brother who died four years ago - he never doubted his authenticity. At the same time, in the documents of exiles, errors were often found, made by the bureaucrats who compiled them: they could distort the first and last name, date of birth and other data. It was later revealed that the record of Eduard Manovas' death was made in error, but the data on his expulsion from the village of Diktarishkiai in the Šiauliai district together with his father Aleksandrs, mother Kateryna and brother Alberts was confirmed. At the same time, the State Security Department itself “gets confused in its testimony.” If earlier they promoted the version about an “illegal immigrant introduced in the 90s”, now they claim that Manovas began working for Russian intelligence in 2018, when he was 76 years old. This seems rather ridiculous: why would the intelligence services need an old man who does not have access to state secrets, whose interests are limited to artistic photography and participation in the organization of exiles? The Manovas case continues to unfold and may bring new interesting twists. "ATTACKS ON ESTONIAN TERRITORY" In Estonia, two of the most notable “espionage” cases to date involve local journalists Allan Huntsom and Svetlana Burtseva, who collaborated with Russian media. Huntsom has already received his sentence of six and a half years in prison; Burtseva’s trial is ongoing. Huntsom’s sentence in May 2024 was handed down behind closed doors, with only vague references to “intelligence activities.” Details were only made public in December. It turned out that Hantsom was credited with “planning and preparing attacks on Estonian territory” — on behalf of a certain Ilya Bocharov and Alik Khuchbarov, allegedly connected to Russian intelligence. The essence of these “attacks” was that in December 2023, someone smashed the windows of cars belonging to the head of the Estonian Ministry of Internal Affairs Lauri Läänemetsu and pro-government journalist Andrei Shumakov with stones at night. Monuments erected in honor of Estonians who fought the Red Army in 1919 and in honor of members of the Estonian Waffen SS legion created by the Nazis were also doused with paint. According to investigators, Hantsom approached former police officer Andrei Kolomainen (he has also already been convicted) with this “order,” who, in turn, recruited several other people who directly carried out the “attacks” on cars and monuments. " There were five attacks in total, but more were planned. The other attacks were not carried out because Hantsom was arrested, " said Margo Palloson, head of the Estonian Security Police (KAPO). A total of nine people are linked to this episode. Seven were found guilty by the court, and two are outside Estonia and are wanted. Moreover, according to the Estonian prosecutor's office, the perpetrators did not receive the money they were supposedly promised, meaning that "Russian intelligence" deceived them. The story told raises serious suspicions - the detained "saboteurs" did not need to receive assignments from Moscow to carry out their "sabotage". In recent years, state propaganda in Estonia has been doing everything it can to fan hatred towards Russians, but this is always a double-edged sword – hatred grows on the other side as well. Over the past two years, monuments to Soviet soldiers have been torn down in Estonia, but this was not enough for the authorities – at the same time, the process of destroying the Soviet soldiers’ cemeteries is underway; disturbed bones are dragged off and buried in little-visited places under faceless signs reading “Victims of World War II”. Russian Estonians, the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of those very soldiers whose bones are being desecrated, watch this with impotent fury. Naturally, some may want to take it out on the monuments of those “heroes” who are now raised on shields in Estonia – people who fought in the ranks of the Estonian Waffen SS division. As for the damage caused to the cars of Läänemets and Shumakov, there is no mystery here either. Läänemets is probably the most hated Estonian civil servant by Russians. In the recent past, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs coordinated the vandalism campaign to demolish monuments to Soviet soldiers, and is currently blackmailing the leadership of the Estonian Orthodox Church - they are demanding that it sever all canonical ties with the Moscow Patriarchate, threatening to outlaw the church in case of refusal. As for Shumakov, he is a classic example of the so-called Vyrusi. This propagandist runs the Russian-language version of the Delfi portal, which serves the interests of the Russophobic state, called upon to convey the "party policy" to the local Russian population. And, as is well known, former "friends" who have defected to the "foreigners" always evoke particular hatred. |
Link |
Europe |
Germany says Musk trying to influence election after he backs far-right party |
2024-12-31 |
[IsraelTimes] In opinion piece published in major newspaper over weekend, world’s richest person writes Alternative for Germany is ‘last spark of hope’ for country The German government accused US billionaire Elon Musk on Monday of trying to influence its election due in February with articles supporting the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, even though it suggested they amounted to "nonsense." Musk, who is set to serve Donald Trump ...The cad! Twice caught beating wimmin!... ’s new US administration as an outside adviser, endorsed the AfD as Germany’s last hope in a guest opinion piece for the Welt am Sonntag newspaper that prompted the commentary editor to resign in protest. "It is indeed the case that Elon Musk is trying to influence the federal election" with X posts and the opinion piece, a German government spokesperson said. Musk is free to express his opinion, the spokesperson said, adding: "After all, freedom of opinion also covers the greatest nonsense." Musk, the world’s richest person, has defended his right to weigh in on German politics because of his "significant investments," and has praised the AfD’s approach to regulation, taxes and market deregulation. His intervention has come as Germans prepare to vote in a parliamentary election on Feb. 23 after the collapse of the coalition government led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Musk also called for Scholz’s resignation after a car rammed into a crowd at a Christmas market on Dec. 20, killing five people. The AfD is currently in second place in opinion polls behind the main opposition conservatives, and might be able to thwart a center-right or center-left majority in the election. Germany’s mainstream parties have pledged not to work with the AfD at the national level. The government spokesperson said Musk’s endorsement of the AfD was "a recommendation to vote for a party that is being monitored (by domestic intelligence) on suspicion of being right-wing hard boy and which has already been recognized as partly right-wing hard boy." German politicians have excoriated Musk for his endorsement of the AfD, with the co-leader of Scholz’s Social Democrats ...every time you hear the phrase white people, white supremacy, whiteanything but paint, you're listening to a Democrat. Ask him/her/it to reimagine something for you; they do that a lot, though not well. They can hear a dog whistle a mile or two away. They invented the spoils system and Tammany Hall, and inspired the addition of the word (Thomas) Nastyto the English language. They want to stop continental drift and repeal the law of unintended side effects... (SPD) comparing him to Russian President Vladimir Putin ...President-for-Life of Russia. He gets along well with other presidents for life. He is credited with bringing political stability and re-establishing something like the rule of law, which occasionally results in somebody dropping dead from poisoning by polonium or other interesting substance. Under Putin, a new group of business magnates controlling significant swathes of Russia's economy has emerged, all of whom have close personal ties to him. The old bunch, without close personal ties to Putin, are in jail or in exile or dead from poisoning by polonium or other interesting substances... "Both want to influence our elections and specifically support the AfD’s enemies of democracy. They want Germany to be weakened and plunged into chaos," Lars Klingbeil told the Funke news group on Monday. Friedrich Merz, leader of the opposition Christian Democrats and current favorite to succeed Scholz as chancellor, told Funke that Musk’s comments were "intrusive and pretentious." Musk’s guest opinion piece for Welt am Sonntag — a sister publication of POLITICO owned by the Axel Springer Group — published in German over the weekend, was the second time this month he supported AfD. "The Alternative for Germany (AfD) is the last spark of hope for this country," Musk wrote in his translated commentary. He went on to say the far-right party "can lead the country into a future where economic prosperity, cultural integrity and technological innovation are not just wishes, but reality." The Tesla Motors CEO also wrote that his investment in Germany gave him the right to comment on the country’s condition. The AfD is polling strongly, but its candidate for the top job, Alice Weidel, has no realistic chance of becoming chancellor because other parties refuse to work with the far-right party. An ally of Trump, the technology billionaire challenged the party’s public image in his opinion piece. "The portrayal of the AfD as right-wing hard boy is clearly false, considering that Alice Weidel, the party’s leader, has a same-sex partner from Sri Lanka! Does that sound like Hitler ![]() to you? Please!" Musk’s commentary has led to a debate in German media over the boundaries of free speech, with the paper’s own opinion editor announcing her resignation, pointedly on Musk’s social media platform, X. "I always enjoyed leading the opinion section of WELT and WAMS. Today an article by Elon Musk appeared in Welt am Sonntag. I handed in my resignation yesterday after it went to print," Eva Marie Kogel wrote. The newspaper was also attacked by politicians and other media for offering Musk, an outsider, a platform to express his views in favor of the AfD. Musk’s opinion piece in the Welt am Sonntag was accompanied by a critical article by the future editor-in-chief of the Welt group, Jan Philipp Burgard. "Musk’s diagnosis is correct, but his therapeutic approach, that only the AfD can save Germany, is fatally wrong," Burgard wrote. Responding to a request for comment from the German Press Agency, dpa, the current editor-in-chief of the Welt group, Ulf Poschardt, and Burgard — who is 2xdue to take over on January 1 — said in a joint statement that the discussion over Musk’s piece was "very insightful. Democracy and journalism thrive on freedom of expression." "This will continue to determine the compass of the ’world’ in the future. We will develop ’Die Welt’ even more decisively as a forum for such debates," they wrote to dpa. German government spokeswoman Christiane Hoffmann on Monday said billionaire Elon Musk was trying to exert influence over the German election due to take place on February 23. However, she also sought to downplay the sway that Musk's interventions might have after declaring his support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. "It is indeed the case that Elon Musk is trying to influence the federal election through his statements," said Hoffmann. "He is free to express his opinion. One does not have to share this opinion. Freedom of expression also includes the greatest nonsense," she said. Hoffmann stressed that the elections were a German matter to be decided by the voters at the ballot box. "In Germany, elections are decided by voters at the ballot box," she said, adding that the country's "elections are a matter for Germans." The spokeswoman also pointed out that the AfD was under investigation by the German domestic intelligence service on suspicion of being a far-right extremist organization. At the state level, in some cases, it already has been. |
Link |
Europe | ||
Berlin Police Chief Warns Jews And LGBTQ+ To Exercise Caution In Certain Areas | ||
2024-11-19 | ||
[Jpost] 'There are areas where I would advise people who wear a kippah or are openly homosexual or lesbians to be more attentive,' says Barbara Slowik. Berlin Police Chief Barbara Slowik has issued a warning to Jews and LGBTQ+ individuals to exercise caution in certain areas of the German capital amid rising antisemitism and hate crimes. Speaking to the press, Slowik emphasized the need for vigilance in the wake of recent events, particularly following the attack by the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023. "There are no so-called no-go areas, meaning areas that are too dangerous to enter," Slowik stated, as reported by Die Zeit. "However, there are areas, and we must be honest at this stage, where I would advise people who wear a kippah or are openly homosexual or lesbians to be more attentive," she added, emphasizing the importance of caution in public spaces.
While the police chief did not specify the exact areas of concern, she linked the increase in antisemitic incidents to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. "This understandably increases the fear within the community of becoming a target of an attack," Slowik noted, adding, "That fear and concern remain, I can understand," as reported by Die Zeit. Since October 7, 2023, the Berlin police have initiated over 6,200 investigations related to antisemitism and incitement to hatred, according to Süddeutsche Zeitung. A significant portion of these cases involves hate postings on the internet, property damage, and propaganda offenses. "Of the 1,300 investigations regarding violent crimes, it is mostly about attacks or resistance against police officers at demonstrations," Slowik indicated. Despite the rise in reported incidents, direct violent crimes against Jewish individuals remain relatively low. "Fortunately, the violent crimes against Jewish people are low, but without question, every act is one too many," Slowik emphasized, as noted by Die Zeit. She acknowledged the heightened sense of insecurity within the Jewish-Israeli community, stating, "People from the Jewish-Israeli community in Berlin perceive the total number of anti-Semitic crimes, which raises their fear of becoming targets of attacks," according to Der Standard - Archäologie. In her remarks, Slowik also underscored the complexity of the situation, acknowledging the diverse backgrounds of the city's residents. "I do not want to 'defame' any particular group of people as perpetrators," she stated, emphasizing the importance of not generalizing or assigning blame to entire communities.
On the day of the Hamas massacres, men handed out sweets in celebration in the Berlin neighbourhood of Neukolln, an incident that shocked Germany and led to deep anxiety over whether the recent waves of migration had made Jewish life less safe. Neukolln, also famous for its LGBT nightlife, is the Berlin district with the highest Arab population. The two communities have coexisted for years, although there have been several incidents of gay couples being physically assaulted in recent years. Earlier this month, a large majority of lawmakers in the Bundestag, Germany’s national parliament, voted for a new resolution against anti-Semitism that mentioned migration from the Middle East as a factor. The resolution, drafted by the Greens, the Social Democrats and the Christian Democrats, warned of an “alarming extent of anti-Semitism based on migration from countries where anti-Semitism and hostility to Israel are widespread due to state indoctrination”. The resolution could lead to refugees having their asylum status taken away if they are found guilty of committing anti-Semitic crimes. The migration debate flared again in the summer amid fears of a rise in terrorism, but is likely to play second fiddle to Germany’s stagnating economy in the upcoming election. The hard-Right Alternative for Germany has cited the protection of the country’s Jewish minority as a reason to push through a much tougher policy of mass deportations of refugees back to countries such as Syria. Related: No-go area 07/23/2024 Army says it's time for nation to 'stand up against militants, digital terrorists' No-go area 06/25/2024 Azm-e-Istehkam: Govt clears the air on misconceptions about anti-terror operation No-go area 06/16/2024 Floating Pier off the Coast of Central Gaza will be Partially-Dismantled and Towed to the Port of Ashdod Related: Berlin: 2024-11-18 Armageddon is postponed. How the Americans were prevented from winning the nuclear war Berlin: 2024-11-13 Germany detains teen with ‘extremist Islamic views’ over suspected attack plot Berlin: 2024-11-13 Wilders: 'We must mass deport radical Islamists.' Related: Alternative for Germany: 2024-11-11 ‘Olaf is a Fool' – Berlin responds to Elon Musk's swipe at Chancellor Scholz amid government collapse Alternative for Germany: 2024-10-20 Alleged ISIS supporter suspected of plot to attack Israeli embassy arrested in Germany Alternative for Germany: 2024-09-23 Far-right AfD eyes new win in east German state vote | ||
Link |
Europe |
Lithuania: Holocaust Deniers Score Unprecedented Election Success |
2024-10-15 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Victor Lavrinenko [REGNUM] On October 13, the first round of parliamentary elections took place in Lithuania, the outcome of which already allows us to assess the picture of the changes awaiting the political system of this country. It would seem that there are no particular surprises: the systemic parties are simply forming a new configuration of the ruling coalition. But these elections brought one surprise - the unexpected rise of the absolutely marginal Nazi party, whose leader became infamous for his denial of Lithuanians' guilt for the Holocaust. This success became a clear proof of the process of "grassroots" fascisation of the country, which previously they preferred not to talk about much. The political system of Lithuania will undergo serious changes. FAILED "AGRARIANS" The most powerful of the local parties is the Homeland Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats (HO-LD, also known as the Conservatives). These are the ideological heirs of the "father of Lithuanian independence" Vytautas Landsbergis - he retired from active affairs due to age, but remains an extremely influential figure. His grandson Gabrielius is the head of the LC-LDC, who received the post of Minister of Foreign Affairs in 2020. The Conservatives differ from other major Lithuanian parties in their heightened level of Russophobia and special devotion to Washington, which they consider their unconditional overlord. Domestically, they pursue a distinctly neoliberal policy. In 2008–2012, the Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius, who represented the LC-LD, became the most hated person in the country because he “defeated” the economic crisis by ruthlessly cutting down the country’s social system. Kubilius's activities led to the conservatives going into opposition following the 2012 elections. At that time, a coalition led by the local Social Democratic Party came to power in Lithuania. It lasted for four years, and in 2016, it was replaced by a new coalition led by the Union of Farmers and Greens (UFG). The regular change of ruling coalitions in Lithuania is explained by the fact that the problems of this state are systemic in nature, which means that they cannot be resolved within the current order of things. The voter quickly becomes disappointed with the next political favorites, and he runs to the next ones, forgetting that he once voted for them. Therefore, there is a cycle of parties, changing places in the ruling coalition and opposition every four to eight years. Just by 2016, the country had a demand for new meanings, for the creation of a qualitatively new political system. The people entrusted the Union of Peasants and Greens with satisfying it, but it failed in this task. Firstly, the SKZ received a strong opposition in the form of conservatives. Secondly, the Lithuanian "peasants and greens" did not even try to carry out some kind of "revolution from above". In foreign policy, the SKZ continued the course of its predecessors - confrontation with Russia, attempts to "democratize" Belarus, strategic cooperation with Washington. At the same time, the Lithuanian "agrarians" were so carried away by geopolitical games that they never found any incentives for the development of their country's economy. As a result, in the fall of 2020, the voters asked them to "leave". WAR WITH CHINA AND THE COVID "CONCENTRATION CAMP" However, under the Conservatives’ return to power, Lithuania’s foreign policy games have reached a truly global scale. Immediately after winning the 2020 elections, the Homeland Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats promised to “defend democratic values, oppose human rights violations, and protect freedom fighters around the world – from Belarus to Taiwan.” The main focus of the Conservatives' foreign policy activities in the first year was Belarus. They fiercely supported the Belarusian opposition, introduced new sanctions against Minsk and called on the entire EU to do the same. They did this regardless of the economic losses. The ban on the transit of Belaruskali products through Klaipeda at the end of 2021 alone brought billions of dollars in losses to the Lithuanian economy and led to a wave of layoffs in the transport sector. Another area of activity that Lithuanian conservatives have declared is the fight against the Belarusian NPP. Through their efforts, Lithuania not only refused to purchase electricity produced at the Belarusian NPP, but also persuaded Latvia and Estonia to join this “energy boycott.” But the main result of the conservatives' four years in power was Lithuania's quarrel with China, which again resulted in significant economic losses for the Lithuanians. At first, Vilnius showered Beijing with insults, accusing it of "suppressing democracy" and of the Chinese allegedly engaging in "total espionage" and "influence-grabbing" in the EU countries. But then Lithuania committed a much more serious act: it opened an official representative office of Taiwan, thus directly violating the “one China” principle, which Vilnius supposedly recognizes in words. An enraged Beijing reduced its diplomatic representation in Lithuania to a minimum and imposed sanctions against the Baltic republic, which, again, caused it enormous damage. The authorities promised that it was not a problem, that grateful Taiwan would compensate and even cover all losses with its investments, but nothing of the sort happened. And now opposition Lithuanian politicians are increasingly openly saying that the quarrel with Beijing, which was started literally out of nowhere, was an outright stupidity. Russian-Lithuanian relations suffered even more damage during the conservatives' rule. Long before the start of the SVO, Vilnius was inventing insults against Moscow and constantly inventing all sorts of reasons to prick its neighbor. When the Western campaign to strangle Russia with sanctions began in the spring of 2022, Lithuania, like the other Baltic countries, constantly tried to get ahead of the game and proactively introduced sanctions that Brussels did not even demand of them, such as a ban on issuing visas to all Russian citizens. Lithuanian leaders, including Landsbergis Jr., are telling the population that “it is necessary to prepare for Russian aggression,” because “ if Moscow senses weakness, it will certainly attack.” This creates an atmosphere of extreme nervousness and uncertainty in the country. The conservatives' policy had already become so annoying to the Lithuanian people from the very beginning that within a month of their return to power, more than half of the population had expressed no confidence in the new government. Mass complaints and lamentations began to be heard: why did we vote for these crooks? Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė cynically advised all those dissatisfied to wait for new elections in 2024. The conservatives especially turned people against themselves by tightening the screws to the limit during the Covid pandemic. Unlike Russia, where "self-isolation" lasted only for a few months in 2020, and then the state began to gradually ease restrictions, the Baltic countries existed in the strictest quarantine regime for two years. The population of Lithuania then felt as if they were in a collective prison: residents were even forbidden to leave their municipalities. Ordinary Lithuanians repeatedly asked for these restrictions to be relaxed, and when the authorities refused, mass unrest began in Vilnius. Then the protesters blocked the parliament building, and the police used tear gas to disperse them. Taking into account all of the above, it becomes clear why many people are sick and tired of the SO-KhDL government. ELECTION RESULTS The Seimas of Lithuania is elected by universal secret ballot under a mixed system: 71 deputies in single-member constituencies under the majoritarian system, 70 in a multi-member constituency under party lists. This time, fifteen teams competed for seats in parliament - 14 party candidates and one coalition list; 699 candidates competed in single-member constituencies. And now the results of the first round of voting, which took place on October 13, have become known. In multi-mandate districts, the opposition Social Democratic Party (SDPL) received the maximum result - 20.46% of the votes and 19 mandates. The Conservatives were only in second place - 16.44% support and 15 mandates. In third place was the nationalist party "Nemunas's Dawn" led by former Seimas deputy Remigijus Žemaitaitis. Also in the first round, the three party leaders who ran in single-mandate constituencies were the most successful. Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė from the SO-KhDL received 53.55% in her constituency. The Speaker of the Seimas from the Liberal Movement (this party is the junior partner of the Conservatives in the ruling coalition) Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen received 44.9%, and the chairwoman of Nemunas Day Žemaitaitis received 46.44%. They celebrated victory in single-mandate constituencies already in the first round of elections. Others were content with more modest results: five party chairmen made it to the second round, and three lost the single-mandate elections. What does this result indicate? Fatigue with the current ruling coalition – yes, of course. But the result of the coalition parties cannot be called a rout, and in the case of Šimonytė and Čmilytė-Nilson personally, it is more than successful. This is explained by the fact that both the SO-KhDL and the Liberal Movement have managed to become parties of the Lithuanian bureaucracy, who associate their personal well-being with their success. The class of officials in Lithuania is quite large, and not only they themselves vote for “their” party, but also their entire numerous relatives. Moreover, it must be admitted that in Lithuania many people have been fooled by anti-Russian propaganda; they are impressed by the energetic activities of Šimonytė and her party in “ building a defense against aggressive Russia ”: purchasing weapons, strengthening the army, inviting a permanent Bundeswehr brigade to Lithuania, etc. However, officials, their relatives and victims of Russophobic propaganda were not enough to overcome the negative legacy of the conservatives’ rule. But the success of the Social Democrats is built on the votes of those who are mortally fed up with the government. Their candidate for prime minister is the party chairperson Vilija Blinkevičiūtė. She has one serious advantage: she is not an out-and-out Russophobic and, being a left-wing person, is more interested in the country's internal affairs than in geopolitical confrontation. One plus for Blinkevičiūtė is that she does not share the opinion about the need to liquidate Russian schools in Lithuania. She once disputed the expediency of opening a Taiwan representative office in Vilnius. In 2021, the Social Democrats objected to the crude interference in Georgia's affairs, where conservative representatives began to visit frequently to teach Georgians how to "properly confront Russia." Of course, if the Social Democrats head the new Lithuanian government, one should not expect the state's foreign policy to change in any serious way - the country will remain in the American "train". But the anti-Russian policy will be carried out by Vilnius without the previous enthusiasm and without any completely crude insults to Moscow. "DAWN" OF NEO-NAZISM But what came as a surprise was the huge success of Zarya Nemunas. Its founder, Remigijus Žemaitaitis, was kicked out of the respectable Freedom and Justice party in 2023 after he published a series of anti-Semitic posts on social media. In particular, he tried to absolve Lithuanians of responsibility for aiding the Nazis during the Holocaust (during the Nazi occupation, 200,000 Jews were killed in Lithuania with the active participation of local collaborators). Žemaitaitis accused Jews of attacking Lithuanians during the war (indeed, Jewish partisan units operated on the territory of the republic) and demanded an “apology” from them. The scandal was huge, especially since the US embassy also paid attention to these statements. Zemaitaitis had to say goodbye to both his party at the time and his seat in the Seimas. However, he did not lose his head and quickly organized a new political force, the success of which no one believed in, given the scandalous past of its founder. And suddenly - triumph, incredible success, when unknown marginal nationalists take third place in the elections. This success is the result of thirty years of nationalist propaganda hammered into the heads of the population, when Soviet soldiers were declared “occupiers” and the “forest brothers” (many of whom directly participated in the extermination of those same Jews) were proclaimed “heroes.” It turned out that over the years, a fairly large layer of people has been raised in the country who are ready to repeat the bloody "feats" of their predecessors. The malice of Lithuanian neo-Nazis is directed at the minorities living in Lithuania - Jews, Poles and Russians. And they are much more outspoken and radical than the same conservatives, whose ranks also include a ton of nationalists who are forced to restrain themselves for reasons of respectability. |
Link |
Europe |
AfD's Maximilian Krah on Europe's political quake |
2024-06-17 |
[AsiaTimes] Maximilian Krah was the Alternative for Germany’s lead candidate for European Parliament, and is one of the most controversial and charismatic personalities in German politics. The AfD (Alternative fur Deutschland) took 16% of German votes in the June 9 election, more than any party in Germany’s present governing coalition, and is expected to poll first in three state elections in September. Born in 1977, Krah left the Christian Democrats in 2016 and was first elected to the European Parliament in 2019. He spoke to Asia Times Editor Uwe Parpart and Deputy Editor David Goldman on June 13. Below is a lightly edited transcript of their discussion. Q: Maximilian Krah, that was a significant victory — an earthquake, even. It has set off and continues to set off shockwaves. How did it happen? Specifically, what did German voters, your voters, vote for and against? A: The game changer was the young people. The youngsters made the difference. We saw a 12% increase among voters younger than 24. The left allowed 16- and 17-year-olds to vote, thinking they would support leftist candidates. However, within that group, aged 16 to 24, we gained 12%. We are now the strongest political force among the under-24 demographic, with a total of 17%. This is the game changer because it shows that the future is ours, provided we don’t make mistakes again. We could have done much better if we had adopted more of Donald Trump’s style. During the campaign, I was a victim of some intelligence attacks. |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
How much do Swedish schools pay Miss Shameless for LGBT fairy tales for children? |
2024-04-23 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Viktor Lavrinenko [REGNUM] Sweden passed a law allowing teenagers to change their “legal gender”. In accordance with the norms of the prevailing ideology in the Scandinavian countries, the sexualization of a child is normal. Already in kindergartens, children begin to have it drummed into their heads that a change of sexual orientation, a change of gender, is completely acceptable and even welcomed. In the case of Sweden, which is suffering from a demographic crisis and the prevalence of ethnic crime, such a policy looks especially suicidal. But Stockholm does not intend to give it up. "LEGAL GENDER REASSIGNMENT" Sweden once became the first country to legalize gender reassignment - this happened in 1972. Swedish liberals like to refer to this example, arguing that it is impossible to stand still, that it is necessary to move further towards maximum “emancipation”. Indeed, even now, if a Swede wants to change his gender, he must undergo a thorough examination and obtain a medical diagnosis of “gender dysphoria”. And there are also individuals who want to change their gender “legally”, without medical intervention. And they demand that not only adults, but also teenagers be allowed to do this. Teenagers, they say, should also have the right to experiment with their gender self-identification. And just the other day, the Swedish Riksdag, after a six-hour debate, voted for a new “Law on Gender Equality.” During the discussion, many harsh words and objections were heard from the parliamentary rostrum, since this law seemed, to put it mildly, controversial to many people's representatives. And yet it was adopted: 234 votes for and 94 against. The adoption of the bill was not hindered by the fact that, according to a recent public opinion poll, the majority of Swedes (59%) disapprove of it to one degree or another. The new law, which comes into force on July 1 next year, makes it easier for people who “feel like they belong to the wrong gender or are experiencing gender dysphoria” to “legally change their gender.” This means changing personal data in official documents, but does not imply the physical transformation operation itself. Now in Sweden, anyone wishing to “legally” change their gender must be an adult (at least 18 years old), undergo a serious medical examination and obtain permission from the state National Board of Health and Welfare. Soon, it will be enough only for the doctor’s conclusion that he considers the person’s desire to “change his gender” and “live in a new capacity for a long time” to be confirmed. The age limit has also been shifted: a person who wants to change his “legal gender” will be able to do this upon reaching sixteen years of age. He must also be registered in Sweden or be a Swedish citizen and have a Swedish social security number. Those youth who are under eighteen years of age and wish to “change” their gender must obtain the approval of their parents or guardians. Also, changing one’s “legal gender” will no longer require a diagnosis of “gender dysphoria.” To do this, a certificate from a doctor or psychologist stating that “the legal gender does not correspond to the real one” will be sufficient. By the way, permission from the National Health Council will no longer be required for surgical gender reassignment. Supporters of the bill say its approval brings Sweden closer to other EU countries that already have systems for people to determine their “legal gender.” Indeed, similar laws have already been passed in Denmark, Norway, Finland and Spain. However, the law adopted in Sweden turned out to be not as radical as initially expected - the very first version of the bill, developed in 2021, provided for the possibility of “legal gender change” from the age of twelve! To push through the bill, the Moderate Coalition Party and the Liberals had to ally with the center-left opposition and ignore the opinions of the coalition Christian Democrats and the right-wing Sweden Democrats. Critics of the new law argue that women will be extremely uncomfortable if they have to share changing rooms with those who have undergone “legal transition”. MP Karita Bulven of the Sweden Democrats said: "We believe that this is a reprehensible proposal that could have unforeseen and serious consequences - not only for the individual, but also for society as a whole." 50,000 PER HOUR The processing of the consciousness of Swedish children in the spirit of “anarchist liberalism” has been going on for a long time. The local press reports that Swedish municipalities and preschools are hiring transvestites to read “special fairy tales” to children aged two to seven. There are examples of men in women's clothing showing children what they call "positive queer role models" in gay lingo. The nicknames given for two of these drag queens are "Busty Lady" and "Miss Shameless." Sweden's new “storytellers” (we must assume Astrid Lindgren and Selma Lagerlöf are spinning in their graves) say: “We give children positive queer role models who challenge gender norms. There are no standards or boundaries in the transvestite story." For their “works” on the “progressive” education of the younger Swedish generation, the “storytellers” take a good reward: for two thirty-minute performances they are paid the amount of 7,000 kroner (approximately 50,000 rubles). In addition, they demand that their real names on pay slips not be made public. However, journalist Joakim Lamott extracted the real names of “Busty Lady” and “Miss Shameless” from the employees of the children’s library in the city of Olofström. But before Lamott could do anything with the information received, city authorities contacted the police with a complaint against the journalist. Joachim Lamott was afraid and did not publish the names of the “enlighteners.” And in order to somehow save face, he said: “The municipality of Olofström seems to be very interested in me hiding from the public public documents where the names of these people appear. But I will act in the interests of society, and will make a decision when I study their activities in more detail." Sweden actively brings the “ideals” of LGBT (an extremist movement banned in the Russian Federation) to other countries. Sometimes this turns into misunderstanding and even scandals. Thus, on May 17, the “International Day against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia” was celebrated. In this regard, last year the Swedish Embassy in Kyiv hoisted a rainbow flag over its building. At the same time, the Swedish Ambassador to Ukraine, Tobias Tyberg, demanded on social networks that Ukrainian homosexuals “be immediately allowed to enter into partnerships.” This caused a strong negative reaction among many Ukrainians—and not only among them. Swedish mercenary Mikael Skillt said that now even Ukrainian gays have something to worry about other than raising rainbow flags. “Sweden, as always, knows how to stand out! The only rainbow flag in Kyiv hangs at the Swedish embassy,” he said. Lately, Swedish gays have expressed concern that Sweden, in their opinion, has left the ranks of the “front-line” LGBT* people. Therefore, they put forward seven demands to the country's government: among other things, gays want a new, more “progressive” law on gender identity, the introduction of a “third legal gender”, “improved care for transgender people” and a ban on conversion therapy (a set of practices aimed at treating homosexuality). Here it must be said that until 2022, Sweden was ruled by left-liberals, under whose power the corruption of children was presented as “an achievement of Western civilization.” However, most Swedes seem to be tired of their dominance. According to the results of the 2022 parliamentary elections, the previous left-liberal ruling coalition was replaced by a new, liberal-conservative one. The new rulers promised to toughen the fight against organized crime, expand electronic surveillance, and intensify the fight against illegal migration. However, the government is not very diligent in fulfilling these promises. But, as the example of the new law shows, the insane policy of imposing “gender transitions” continues. STATE MADNESS Recently, a book “How to become a transvestite” was published in Sweden, intended for children aged three to six years. It tells the story of a Swedish boy, Liam, who goes to school, plays with friends and dreams of becoming... a transvestite. Since his “retarded” parents were unable to inform him on this issue, Liam has to independently search the library for the information he is interested in. Each of the stages of these searches is described in detail and provided with pictures so that young readers can easily follow the “guide” and independently complete “tasks” at home. The 28-year-old owner of Cookies'n Dragons, Remi Livang, who wrote this “wonderful” book, says that the idea came to her after she learned about the “Busty Lady” and “Miss Shameless” reading “fairy tales” to Swedish children. Livang was sincerely outraged by the fact that, it turns out, some parents are unhappy with these “fairy tales” - and she decided to make her contribution to introduce “tolerance” into children’s brains. In fairness, it should be mentioned that Swedish parents are increasingly showing their indignation in such cases. One of the relatively recent examples of this kind is the fathers and mothers of students at a school in the Ekensberg district of Stockholm who demanded that the administration of this educational institution remove the rainbow flags hung throughout its classrooms and corridors. Parents irritably told teachers that the presence of these flags promotes things that are not very suitable for young children. “What happened to children's rights and what messages are we sending to students?” - one of them gets angry. However, school director Christina Bergström insists that the school “should be a welcoming place for everyone” - and, of course, especially for homosexuals. If she satisfies her parents’ request, she will instantly be pecked by the advocates of “tolerance,” who are now extremely influential in Sweden. As if in this case we wouldn’t have to part with the director’s chair. Sweden is currently suffering from a demographic crisis. According to the government Statistics Office for 2023, the number of newborns in the past year was the lowest in the last twenty years. The number of children born per woman has become the lowest in the entire history of Sweden. At the same time, the population increased in 95 municipalities and decreased in 193. Swedish patriots are worried that the decline in the country's population will be made up by migrants. Actually, this process has been going on for many years - 10.5 million people live in the country, of which over a million come from Asia and Africa. Many of the migrants join the ranks of organized and street crime, which is increasingly interfering in the daily lives of Swedes. Against this background, the internal policy of the state, which destroys a normal family, must be recognized as nothing less than insane. |
Link |
Europe |
German billionaire meets with AfD party; left-wing interior minister calls for boycott on his dairy empire |
2023-12-11 |
[Remix] One of the richest men in Germany is now openly meeting with the Alternative for Germany (AfD), and the move has led to calls for a boycott from left-wing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser and the country’s main establishment parties. Theo Muller — who owns some of the most popular food brands in Germany, including Mulllermilch, Weihenstephan, and Landliebe — stated that he held talks with AfD co-chairwoman Alice Weidel several times. He is considered one of the first major business figures to openly make contact with the AfD, and Germany’s establishment parties, including the Christian Democrats (CDU) and Free Democrats (FDP), are backing calls for a boycott. Muller is estimated to be worth over €4 billion, and his meeting could pave the way for other business leaders to openly back the AfD.... Faeser’s call for a boycott was backed by SPD leader Saskia Esken as well as the CDU, FDP, Greens, and CSU [forget one?] CDU’s General Secretary Martin Huber said: "It must be clear to every entrepreneur and every employee: The AfD is damaging Germany." |
Link |
Europe |
AfD's limited success |
2023-10-30 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. Text taken from a news article posted at secretra.com Commentary by Russian military journalist Boris Rozhin is in italics. [ColonelCassad] The German political palette has been significantly updated after the elections in Hesse and Bavaria. In both states, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) took an honorable second place after powerful competitors Christian Democrats (CDU) and Christian Socialists (CSU). This is an undoubted success, and the election results echo throughout Germany, causing the displeasure of politicians and federal authorities. The AfD confidently exposes to voters the failure of the current government on issues of migration, economics and green energy, recruiting supporters into its ranks. Her political opponents, on the contrary, are losing their voters. However, this is not the last election in which the AfD may surprise its competitors. According to the results of the latest elections in Bavaria and Hesse, the party will now have 70 seats, an increase of 50% compared to the previous elections in 2018. The party did better than the polls predicted. In reality, she is stronger than many people think. Those people who vote for the party are those who cannot openly express their opinion, but who will willingly cast a ballot for the AfD. There are plenty of such “gray” voters. Judging by the results, the party's support level has increased to 21-23% from 10-12% a few years ago. It is not for nothing that the idea of banning the AfD is being promoted in the German media, accusing the latter of all mortal sins. Moreover, street attacks have already begun against leading party officials and threats of physical violence have been made. It is obvious that the party is playing on the contradictory policies of the current authorities. Everything the Scholz administration does goes against the interests of Germany and the people of the country. Germans are fed up with mass migration, rising energy prices, inflation and falling living standards. They had previously been happy about helping Ukraine and were ready to endure temporary difficulties until Russia fell. However, the reality for the Germans turned out to be much harder than the rosy prospects. Most of those dissatisfied with Scholz's policies are potential AfD voters. The party's popularity is growing throughout Europe. Its goals are replicated, and its methods of work are adopted by other European opposition parties. The AfD is being talked about more and more on TV and in newspapers in various European countries. The situation in Germany is also changing. The AfD is now working to create conditions that make it increasingly difficult for ruling parties to form coalitions. In the long term, she sees the only viable path to power through a coalition with the CDU. The big question is whether this will ever happen. At the same time, the ruling parties have not yet completely lost the trust of their voters, and therefore are ready and will resist the opposition. As a result, the political sympathies of Germans will depend on the situation with migrants and the economy. However, in Germany there is no progress in either area. With a high degree of probability they will play against the AfD in the same way as against Marine Le Pen’s party in France, when any coalitions will be “friends against the AfD.” The AfD itself, like Le Pen’s party, is now trying to gain respectability and move away from greater radicalism, but here it has exactly the same problem as Le Pen - moving towards right-of-centrism, it is losing left and right radicals who demand more decisive struggle against Scholz and co. At the same time, opponents will go all out accusing the AfD of latent fascism.But what the AfD will succeed is to gain a foothold in the Landtags and strengthen its influence at the all-German level, simultaneously having a hand in the already inevitable collapse of the Scholz government, which will face several more defeats in the coming months. This will be influenced, among other things, by the ongoing recession, growing problems with migrants, declining living standards and general fatigue from the war in Ukraine. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Lithuanian Defense Minister blabbed out information about the purchase of Leopard tanks |
2023-07-30 |
Direct Translation via Googler Translate. Edited. by Viktor Lavrinenko [Regnum] The Republic of Lithuania intends to purchase at least 40 tanks for its armed forces. However, this deal, even before it was concluded, has already turned into a scandal and a quarrel between representatives of the highest echelons of power in Lithuania. President Gitanas Nauseda accused Defense Minister Arvydas Anušauskas of disclosing classified information about the upcoming purchase. But the minister refused to admit his guilt and continues to stick to his line. Nauseda and Anušauskas are representatives of opposing political clans, and their clash is due to the upcoming presidential elections. IRON LEOPARDS FOR IRON WOLVES On July 24, a meeting of the Lithuanian State Defense Council was held, at which the topic of arms purchases was discussed. The Lithuanian army is going to form a division, which will also include a unit equipped with heavy armored vehicles. On this occasion, the commander of the Lithuanian army, Valdemaras Rupshis , announced that it would be a light infantry division, consisting of three brigades. Two of them are the regular brigades Geležinis vilkas ("Iron Wolf") and Žemaitija ("Zemaitija"), plus the reserve brigade Aukštaitija ("Aukšaitija"). "And in addition to the division, we in the Geležinis vilkas brigade, in my deep conviction, must create a tank battalion in order to be able to conduct not only stationary defensive operations, but also maneuverable defense with the possibility of offensive and counterattack. As the current war shows, we must inevitably have all this," Rupshis emphasized. Previously, Lithuania did not have its own tanks, but now the state intends to buy them - at least forty units. However, since the acquisition of heavy combat vehicles will cost a huge amount, which is especially sensitive for a small and poor state, the authorities decided to get additional justification from the military that the Lithuanian army needs tanks, and not something else. “Members of the State Defense Council have requested the army to provide an additional political, economic, production and financial assessment - taking into account the fact that this will be one of the largest acquisitions of Lithuania. We are talking about two billion euros,” explained the adviser to the President of Lithuania, Kestutis Budrys. After the meeting of the State Defense Council, Budrys clarified that "this amount includes not only the cost of tanks, but also ammunition, logistics, supplies," and the final decision on which tank manufacturer Lithuania will buy has not yet been made. However, Lithuanian Defense Minister Arvydas Anushauskas has a different opinion on this matter. Anusauskas, leaving the meeting of the State Defense Council, decided that it was necessary to immediately tell the public about what was discussed there. He said that in the near future representatives of his department would sign a protocol of intent with German manufacturers regarding the purchase of Leopard tanks. The minister said that when considering the issue of acquiring tanks, his department chose between three options. “ We evaluated German Leopard tanks, American Abrams and Korean Black Panthers ,” the minister wrote on social networks. According to Anushauskas, the analysis and evaluation of the proposals submitted by the manufacturers took about six months, and in the end, comparing such factors as “cost and maintenance costs, operational environment, mobility, adaptability, security, firepower”, the Lithuanians chose the German Leopard. For a long time, Lithuania has chosen Germany among all NATO countries in terms of military cooperation - in particular, the Lithuanian authorities are actively seeking the fulfillment by Berlin of the promise given by Chancellor Olaf Scholz : to deploy a Bundeswehr brigade of up to four thousand military personnel in Lithuania. Apparently, this fact also greatly influenced the choice of the country that produced the tanks. The minister recalled that the Lithuanian armed forces already have some German weapons systems at their disposal, with which Leopard-type tanks will be well compatible. A FIND FOR A SPY Anusauskas added that the supply of tanks to Lithuania will be made within four to six years. According to his department, this could cost the state budget an average of about 200 million annually. However, these statements by the Minister of Defense barely had time to be heard, when Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda attacked him with harsh criticism, accusing him of publishing confidential information. According to the president, an agreement was reached at a meeting of the State Defense Council that such data, as Anusauskas published, " should be of limited use " and not immediately published. “I understand that it may seem very important to someone to share the latest information on the social network - but this, of course, should not be the main function of a minister or any other public official. You always need to think about the consequences of making this information public ,” the president told reporters, referring to “ enemies who listen to this information with their ears pricked up and draw their own conclusions.” The minister hastily began to make excuses - and again used social networks for this. Anusauskas assures that the information he made public was not secret: “I want to emphasize an essential point - in the field of defense, no information that has any kind of secrecy has been made public and is not being made public ,” the minister stressed. He also added that the abuse of secrecy is prohibited by law. “ If this principle had not been respected, you probably would not have known about the arrival of allied units in Lithuania, or about the exercises, or about the equipment received by the army, or about the acquisitions planned with the money of all taxpayers,” Anushauskas fights back. According to the minister, the public should know how much decisions to strengthen the army will cost the country. It is possible that the matter will not be limited to just a verbal sparring between the president and the minister. Seimas deputy Agne Shirinskienė (a member of the faction of the opposition Union of Peasants and Greens of Lithuania) appealed to the prosecutor's office with a demand to find out exactly whether the minister had really betrayed state secrets. This is not Shirinskene's first attack on Anusauskas - a few months ago, she convicted him of the fact that the minister speaks Russian much better than English, which, they say, is completely unacceptable for the holder of such a post. PRESIDENTIAL AMBITIONS “If the matter takes a serious turn, then the president’s accusations of almost treason against the head of the defense department can lead to Anusauskas not only losing his post, but also criminal prosecution,” political observer Vladimir Matveev assesses the seriousness of the incident . In order to understand the whole context of the scandal, it should be noted that Nauseda and Anušauskas belong to different political groups. Anusauskas is a member of the main coalition party "Union of the Fatherland - Christian Democrats of Lithuania" (they are also "conservatives"). For those who follow Lithuanian domestic politics, it has long been no secret that the leadership of the SO-CDL has not managed to build good relations with Nausėda, and recently they have been openly hostile, periodically exchanging critical remarks. Last spring, the "conservatives" managed to very sensitively prick Nauseda, organizing through the press the stuffing of information that the president had been hiding for more than thirty years - that in his youth he was in the ranks of the CPSU. Nausėda did not remain in debt - and is now hitting Anusauskas, who, unlike other SO-CDL leaders, has a fairly high level of voter sympathy in Lithuania. Less than a year is left before the new presidential elections. Gitanas Nauseda's rating is more than 60 percent, and only Anusauskas can compete with him from politicians in the current ruling coalition of conservative liberals. Therefore, the squabbling between the president and the minister should be regarded only as one of the episodes of the election campaign that has begun , ”explains Vladimir Matveev. So far, none of the politicians and leaders of the country has announced plans to run for the presidency, but Nauseda will nominate his candidacy for sure. The name of the CO-CDL candidate is not yet visible. It is only known that the head of this party, Gabrielius Landsbergis , really wants to run , but he is one of the most unpopular politicians in Lithuania. At the same time, both Nauseda and Anusauskas (like his entire SO-CDL party) are extremely anti-Russian. However, there are no politicians with a different opinion on the Lithuanian political Olympus now - or they carefully hide it. Therefore, no matter what the result of the next presidential election, scheduled in Lithuania for May 2024, may be, Moscow cannot count on any “thaw” in the Lithuanian direction. |
Link |