Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Home Front: WoT
Gitmo hunger strike worsens
2013-06-01
That's one way of looking at it...
A long-running hunger strike by detainees at Guantanamo has worsened since Barack Obama promised action to close the controversial prison camp in a landmark speech last Thursday.

On the eve of Obama's address, there were 103 prisoners on hunger strike, with 31 being force-fed by military authorities and one in hospital. Since then, not a single prisoner has stopped their strike, and now 36 of the detainees are being force-fed to keep them alive, with five of them being hospitalised.
The point of a hunger strike is to get ordinary people to care about the 'noble courage' of a person who starves himself to death, and to make the authorities look inhumane by not meeting the demands of the prisoner.

The solution is simple: put the onus back on the prisoner.

Serve three meals a day: fresh, properly prepared, and meeting the requirements of the prisoner's religious faith. Indeed, I'd ensure that the food was mouth-watering, flavorful and aromatic. If they eat, fine. If they don't, retrieve the tray after an hour. Make clear that under no circumstances will we acquiesce to their political demands, and also make clear that under no circumstances will we save them from themselves. If they wish to starve to death they may do so without interference.

Cynical? Yes. Cold? Yes. Effective? You bet. It would take a brave prisoner indeed to be the second one to starve to death after seeing how little the death of the first one moved me.
In telephones calls and letters to their legal representatives, detainees have also described a regime of intimidating body searches and other restrictions they say are designed to prevent them from talking to their lawyers and also to break their resolve.
Ah, the tricks of the prison guards. They should compare and contrast to, say, a Turkish prison...
However, it seems that the hunger strike is showing no signs of ending, despite several promises made by Obama to shutter the camp and release many of those who have been held there without charge for more than a decade. "The numbers of strikers are not moving downwards. Nothing has changed," said Carlos Warner, a lawyer for several detainees.
Of course not. They think they're winning.
Others who work with the detainees said they feared the media spotlight would move on from the issue, despite the fact that nothing concrete has yet emerged from Obama's speech.
The usual state of affairs, as it turns out...
"The hunger strike is the only reason we are talking about Guantanamo. It would be a terrible mistake by the administration to think that they have dealt with this with one speech," said Omar Farah, a lawyer at the Centre for Constitutional Rights
...a communist front organization...
which works with numerous prisoners who are striking.

Obama has now promised a series of measures at Guantanamo, including the lifting of a moratorium on releasing detainees to Yemen, a plan to appoint a senior official to the task of overseeing transfers, the trying those to be charged in the future within the civilian justice system, and the moving of military tribunals to US soil.

In his speech, the president also referenced the strike and portrayed Guantanamo as a moral wrong that needed to be corrected, in accord with American values and to stop harming the country's image abroad.
The only people who think ill of us because of Gitmo are the people who already think ill of us. Closing Gitmo won't fix any of that, it will just demonstrate that we are weak and callow.
There are 166 prisoners currently at the base and 86 of them have been cleared for release, though US security concerns have meant there has been little recent movement to send any prisoners to their home countries or other states willing to take them. Of those 86, 56 are from Yemen, who will now theoretically benefit from the lifting of restrictions on transfers to that country.
How many of the 56 will refrain from being hard boyz once on the ground in Yemen? And how many will get whacked by the security forces there in the first three months? This assumes that none of them are Houthis and go to Syria to fight and be whacked...
But lawyers and human rights activists have said that they need to see firm steps taken after the speech. They point out that Obama first promised to close the base in 2008 and has repeated his desire to do so with the help of the Republican-controlled House of Representatives -- something that many leading figures in the GOP have vowed to stop.

If this latest push fails, some observers say, the impact on the hunger striking prisoners' morale could be catastrophic.
The heart [urp] bleeds...
"In many ways, the most dangerous thing for these prisoners is to offer them hope," said Clive Stafford Smith, a British lawyer at the group Reprieve who works with numerous inmates, including the sole Briton in the camp, Shaker Aamer.

Smith and other lawyers also described harsh regime in the base, including intense body searches of prisoners seeking to make phone calls. Smith said that this appeared designed to intimidate inmates from communicating with the outside world. He reported that of the last six phone calls he had tried to place to clients, four of them had been rejected because detainees had not wanted to go through the process. Warner also said he had had recent difficulty communicating with his clients.

In a statement, Smith reported Aamer as telling him last Friday: "To describe you the humiliation ... they tossed me around like a burger. Flat on my back. They started dressing me with small-size underwear."
Did he talk in a high, squeaky voice? I'll bet it wasn't quite that tight...
Other detainees have made allegations that their genitals are touched during the searches and even that they have been subject to body cavity searches.
Ah, so we've hired the TSA to guard them!
"Our private parts are checked and they know is a sensitive matter for us and our religion," said Syrian detainee Abu Wael in a statement passed to the Guardian.

Wael has now filed legal papers alleging a deliberate policy of using the searches as a method of intimidation. In documents sent to a Washington DC court, he stated: "The primary manner in which this has been done has been by instituting a new search protocol that exploits the prisoners' well-known phobia when it comes to anything that might be construed as sexual contact."
The prisoners' well-known phobia? Isn't that a phobia for most of us?
That has been denied by the US military, who say searches are routinely carried out any time a prisoner moves within the camp. "We conduct detention operations in a safe, humane, legal and transparent manner. Any allegations that we are conducting strip searches and cavity searches as a condition of legal phone calls are nonsense," said spokesman Colonel Samuel House.

However, there is little doubt that the strike has been a PR disaster for the Obama administration -- highlighting both its failure to fulfil campaign promises and the conditions at the camp, where scores of men are held indefinitely without charge or prospect of release.
Far better to take the Bush approach: we're jugging them until we're sure they'll behave, and it's up to them to convince us.
That has been heightened by harrowing accounts of the reality of the mass force-feeding that is now being carried out on dozens of the protesters by a military medical team rushed to Cuba to deal with the crisis.

"Sometimes the person on hunger strike vomits as a result of this, which is painful. This happened to me several times when the [feeding] tube goes down from the nose to the throat and strikes the tongue," said Yemeni detainee Samir Mukbel in another statement obtained by Stafford Smith.
Yep. A nasogastric tube is no fun. You could always eat, Samir...
Others have talked of the impact that a prolonged hunger strike has on their health.
Outstanding command of the obvious, these lads...
Pakistani detainee Ahmed Rabbani claimed he weighed just 107lbs -- down from 167lbs before the strike. "I vomit and cough blood ... I have often thought of smashing my head against the wall and cracking it because of [severe pain]," he said.
We're not stopping you...
Link


Home Front: WoT
US-Pakistani gets 15 years for aiding al Qaeda
2010-06-11
A Pakistani-born American man accused of providing support for al Qaeda's efforts to combat US forces in Afghanistan was sentenced to 15 years in prison on Wednesday, officials said.

A Justice Department statement said Syed Hashmi, who pleaded guilty on April 27 to a charge of conspiracy to provide material support or resources to the terror network, received the maximum sentence under law from US District Chief Judge Loretta Preska.

US Attorney Preet Bharara said, "Hashmi was held accountable for his conduct, and his sentence makes clear that individuals who provide support to such terror networks will be brought to justice."

"Terrorist organisations such as al Qaeda depend upon a wide array of individuals across the world to accomplish their violent objectives. This support network includes individuals like Syed Hashmi who embrace al Qaeda's violent ideology and stand ready to translate ideology into action," the prosecutor added.

Hashmi, also known as Fahad," was arrested on June 6, 2006, form the Heathrow Airport in London, shortly before boarding a flight to Pakistan. He was later transferred to theUS, becoming the first person extradited from Britain to the United States on terrorism charges."

Hashmi, born in Pakistan and educated in New York, was accused of letting a terrorism suspect stay in his student apartment in London and allowing the man to use his cell phone to call other suspects.

The guest also had a supply of rain gear, such as ponchos and waterproof socks that was allegedly being delivered to al Qaeda in Pakistan.

Human rights groups including Amnesty International and the Centre for Constitutional Rights, alleged Hashmi had been subjected to harsh pre-trial detention.
Link


Home Front: WoT
US press ignores Gitmo protesters
2007-01-11
The attempt of a peace group to highlight the plight of Guantanamo prisoners by protesting outside the notorious US detention facility has been ignored by the mainstream American press.

The 12-person delegation, organised by a group called Code Pink, includes US “peace mom” Cindy Sheehan whose son was killed in the war in Iraq, Adele Welty whose firefighter son was killed on 9/11, former diplomat Ann Wright who resigned over the invasion of Iraq, and Bill Goodman of the US Centre for Constitutional Rights who has taken the cases of Guantanamo detainees to the US Supreme Court. On Thursday, according to the online site Common Dreams, the group will walk to the gates of the Guantanamo prison from the Cuban side. A petition for access to the prison itself has been denied.
Okay. Lemme get this straight: The story here is that there's no story? The press produces a report that the press isn't producing a report?

I think I'll go lie down. It's just too subtle for me.
Link


Home Front: WoT
US 'neglects mental health of Guantanamo inmates'
2006-06-14
I may need the real big violin...
Campaigners have accused the Bush administration of deliberately ignoring mounting evidence of psychological and mental health problems among prisoners at Guantanamo Bay despite more than 40 previous suicide attempts.
Yeah, it oughta be like Boys Town down there...
Lawyers who represent some of the 460 men at the prison said no one should be surprised by the suicides of three inmates at the weekend - one of whom was 17 years old when he was incarcerated and another who was earmarked for transfer.
So one was young and one was stupid?
Bill Goodman, legal director of the Centre for Constitutional Rights (CCR), said:"The Bush administration has systematically and deliberately denied these men their most basic rights through a policy of choking off all contact, communication, information and hope.[It has] consistently fought to keep these men from lawyers, doctors and others who were willing to help them."
My, my. I can't see through my tears...
His comments came after a senior US official dismissed the deaths as nothing more than a "good PR stunt". The Bush administration sought to retreat from that position yesterday with Cully Stimson, deputy assistant secretary of defence for detainee affairs, telling the BBC: "We are always concerned when someone takes his own life. Because, as Americans, we value life, even the lives of violent terrorists who are captured waging war against our country."
Be advised, Cully doesn't speak for me.
The CCR provided a precise timetable detailing the efforts of campaigners to raise the issue of suicide risk among inmates as well as the government's tacit acknowledgement of the problem, stretching back to 2002.There have reportedly been 41 suicide attempts made by a total of 25 prisoners. One man, Jumah al-Dossari, has tried to take his life 12 times.
See, Jumah. Your buddies proved that dreams can come true. So you keep trying...
In 2003, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the only independent organisation granted access to the prisoners, warned of the severe mental health issues facing many and said the nature of their incarceration and interrogation - including humiliating acts, solitary confinement, temperature extremes, use of forced positions - was "a form of torture".
If you twist the definition of 'torture' sufficiently, that is ...
Another CCR lawyer, Gitanjali Gutierrez, said: "The deaths come as absolutely no surprise to the attorneys who have been involved in this litigation. Indeed, they do not even come as a surprise to the military, which has acknowledged they were hoping aware some of the men at Guantanamo may try to kill themselves."
That's a feature, not a bug ...
The three men - Manei al-Otaibi, 30 and Yasser al-Zahrani, 21, both from Saudi Arabia, and Ali Abdullah Ahmed 33, from Yemen - were found dead in their cells on Saturday morning. It emerged they had tried to conceal themselves from the guards by hanging laundry from the ceiling of their cells and that at least one had arranged his bed to make it appear he was asleep.
He's asleep now...
The Pentagon described the men as having links to al-Qa'ida, the Taliban and an Islamist organisation that it claims is a terrorist group, but none of the three had been charged. Indeed, the authorities confirmed Mr Otaibi had been slated for transfer to a third country but a lawyer said the prisoner had not been informed.
Ooooops...
The Labour MEP Arlene McCarthy co-signed a European Parliament resolution calling on the US to set a timetable for closure of the prison. Ms McCarthy, who visited the prison last month, said: "There is a complete failure by the US administration to see why this is not the right way to deal with suspected terrorists."
I think a lot of us here know how we should deal with them, but I've got a feeling Arlene wouldn't be too crazy about our suggestions either.
Link


Terror Networks
US reveals names of Guantánamo detainees
2006-04-20
The US government has released its first official list of detainees at the Guantánamo Bay prison camp.

The list of 558 people comprises three-quarters of the total number of detainees who have passed through the camp, which was set up in 2002 after the end of the war in Afghanistan.

Secrecy surrounding the camp, and persistent reports of human rights violations, have attracted notoriety for the prison, in the US naval base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba

The people named on the detainee list come from 41 countries, although nearly two-thirds are from Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen.

Former officials of Afghanistan's Taliban regime are particularly prominent on the tally. The Taliban's former defence ministry chief of staff Mullah Mohammed Fazil is still in custody along with intelligence officials Abdul Haq Wasiq and Gholam Ruhani.

Kabul's former ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef, is also included, although he was released from the prison camp late last year.

Also included on the list is David Hicks, an Australian for whom lawyers are currently fighting to establish British citizenship via his mother, who was born in south London.

The court of appeal last week rejected a home office claim that he was not entitled to register his citizenship on account of his previous alleged membership of al-Qaida.

The Guardian today reported that foreign secretary Jack Straw had written to US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice demanding the release from Guantánamo Bay of UK resident Bisher al-Rawi.

Mr Rawi, an Iraqi citizen, took the British government to court last month claiming he had been hired by MI5 to track an alleged Muslim extremist and was only arrested after British intelligence passed false information to the US.

Another detainee named on the list is Muhammed al-Qahtani, accused of being the 20th hijacker in the September 11 attacks. The Saudi citizen was stopped as he tried to enter the US in Orlando, Florida, shortly before the attacks.

Details of Qahtani's interrogation caused outrage and shed fresh light on the techniques used in Guantánamo Bay when a logbook was leaked to Time magazine last year.

He was frequently awoken at 4am and interrogated until after midnight, with requests for toilet breaks refused until he wet himself, while Christina Aguilera music was played at him if he dozed off.

The list has previously been seen by members of the Red Cross, but was only publicly released after the Associated Press news agency sued US authorities under the freedom of information act.

It numbers all the detainees who have appeared at hearings in Guantánamo Bay to determine their combatant status.

The hearings took place between July 2004 and January 2005. All detainees at the prison between those dates received a hearing, but only 38 of them were determined to be "no longer enemy combatants" by the military tribunals, and only 29 of those were released.

A total of around 750 people are believed to have passed through the camp, and 490 are currently believed to be in custody there.

Groups working for the release of detainees welcomed the release of the list. Sayeed Sharif Youssefi, an official from Afghanistan's independent peace and reconciliation commission, said it would help in his efforts to obtain the release of Afghan detainees.

"This is very good news and it helps us because now it is easy for us to identify the Afghans in Guantánamo, learn how many there are and from which provinces they come from," he said.

Bill Goodman, legal director of the Centre for Constitutional Rights said: "This is information that should have been released a long time ago, and it's a scandal that it hasn't been."


Link


Home Front: WoT
Guantanamo detainees in protest fast
2005-09-01
Dozens of Guantanamo Bay detainees have started a new hunger strike at the US detention centre and at least one has written a will in anticipation of starving to death, human rights lawyers say.
G'bye. Let us know if there's barbecue in Hell...
The New York-based Centre for Constitutional Rights said the hunger strike began because the US Department of Defence reneged on promises to negotiate with prisoners after a June-July hunger strike that involved up to 200 of the 500-plus men detained at the remote base. The military said only 52 prisoners were involved in the first strike, after a released prisoner and lawyers who spoke to detained clients published the news. "The DOD is practising dangerous deception," an attorney with the centre, Gitanjali Gutierrez, said in a statement. "It hid evidence of the hunger strike and prisoner abuse from visiting senators and the public." Spokesmen for the detention mission at Guantanamo could not immediately be reached for comment.
Link


Home Front: Culture Wars
Sikhs go to court over turban logo
2005-07-16
A NUMBER of Sikh transit employees in New York have filed discrimination charges over a policy requiring them to display company logos on their turbans.

One case involved a federal lawsuit filed on behalf of Kevin Harrington, a Sikh subway train operator who has been forced to wear an Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) logo on his turban since January.
Five Sikh station agents, meanwhile, filed formal complaints on the same issue with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The employees charge that the headware logo policy - introduced after the September 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Centre - amounts to discrimination.

"The MTA honoured me for driving my train in reverse away from the towers on 9/11 and leading passengers to safety. They called me a 'hero of 9/11'," Mr Harrington said.

"I didn't have a corporate logo on my turban then. Why am I being threatened with reassignment in a rail yard unless I wear one now?"

A spokeswoman for New York City Transit declined to comment on the pending lawsuit, but confirmed that policy allowed for only MTA-approved headware.

"Sikhs are allowed to wear their turbans, but they must have the logo," she said.

The Harrington lawsuit was filed on his behalf by the Centre for Constitutional Rights and the Sikh Coalition, an organisation founded in the wake of the September 11 attacks to educate Americans about Sikhism.

A number of New York Sikhs were badly beaten after the attacks, after being mistaken for Arabs.

Two years ago, a Sikh man filed a lawsuit against the New York Police Department and its chief Raymond Kelly after being dismissed from the force for refusing to remove his turban or beard.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Dawn (Yawn) Guantanamo: the level of hell Dante forgot
2004-12-18
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde

In Camp X-Ray, my cage was right next to a kennel housing an Alsatian dog. He had a wooden house with air conditioning and green grass to exercise on. I said to the guards, 'I want his rights,' and they replied, 'That dog is member of the US army'." This is Jamal al-Harith 's painful recollection of his time at Guantanamo Bay, as narrated by him to the Daily Mirror. Released in March this year, al-Harith is one of four British men, former inmates at Guantanamo, currently suing the US government for torture and human rights violations. The other three are Shafiq Rasul, Asif Iqbal and Rhuhel Ahmed. They filed the suit in Washington DC. It names American Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Richard Myers, among others, as defendants. The suit is backed by the New York based Centre for Constitutional Rights and it is filed under the Alien Tort Claims Act, Geneva Conventions and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
AKA "The Usual Suspects"...
The plaintiffs allege that they were arbitrarily detained and underwent harrowing torture and abuse; indeed the treatment meted out to them by the American forces was in contravention of all conventions on military conduct, the treatment of prisoners of war and universal human rights in general to which the US has been a very enthusiastic signatory.
"Somebody tol' us they wuz gonna cut our heads off! That's, like, barbaric!"
This leaves the Americans in no position to speak of Geneva Conventions, or any other convention for that matter, when speaking of the rights that are due to their servicemen taken prisoner.
Sure it does. Even if there were violations, one side's violations don't justify violations on the other side — except under certain circumstances.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Eight US soldiers sue own army
2004-12-06
EIGHT US soldiers have sued the Pentagon, claiming the military extended their tours of duty in Iraq although their contracts had expired, their attorneys said. It is the only known court challenge by active-duty soldiers against the US Defence Department's so-called stop-loss policy, said attorney Staughton Lynd. About 7000 soldiers are affected at any given time by the policy, which bars them from leaving the military or moving to other units for an 18-month period if they are in units deployed or about to deploy to Iraq and Afghanistan, said Lieutenant Colonel Pamela Hart, an army spokeswoman. "It stops movement of soldiers so units can maintain integrity of strength," Lt Col Hart said. "So, units that deploy together come home together."

Seven of the soldiers in the lawsuit have asked to remain anonymous, but one of them, David Qualls, said at a news conference in Washington that the court challenge is over "a question of fairness." I enlisted in July 2003. I completed and served that one year," Mr Qualls said. "I feel it is time to let me go back to my wife." Mr Qualls signed a "Try One" contract on July 7, 2003, which allows a soldier to serve for one year before deciding whether to extend service. Qualls says no one told him about the stop-loss policy. The other soldiers asked to remain anonymous "because they fear one or another kind of retaliation if their names became known," Lt Col Lynd said. Six of the soldiers are stationed in Iraq, while the two others are in Kuwait and on their way to the embattled country, he said. "Our government has not been honest with Mr Qualls and the other seven plaintiffs in this action," said Jules Lobel, an attorney at the Centre for Constitutional Rights (CCR). "The government must tell them the key facts that may affect his enlistment. One key fact is how long" they are supposed to be enlisted, Lobel said. Qualls has been stationed at Camp Taji, north of Baghdad, since March 2004. It has been the target of suicide bombings and mortar attacks.
Link


Home Front: WoT
US argues Guantanamo detainees have no constitutional rights
2004-12-04
A group of 10 Guantanamo Bay prisoners who are waging a legal battle over their detention have no constitutional right to do so, US Government lawyers said and urged a judge to dismiss their cases. Lawyers for the men being held as enemy combatants at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, argued that their clients have the right to a fair trial and should be given the proper opportunity to defend themselves. They urged US District Court Judge Joyce Hens Green to deny the Government's motion to dismiss the cases and to declare invalid the current military tribunal process at Guantanamo because it fails to provide due process of law.

Government lawyers told Judge Green the prisoners - who have all been deemed "enemy combatants" by a US military tribunal, which means they are not entitled to the protections normally given to prisoners of war - did not have the right to be heard in court. "We think that the enemy petitioners... have no constitutional rights," said Brian Boyle, principal deputy associate attorney-general at the Justice Department. "They are enemy combatants."

Human rights groups and lawyers for the prisoners say the tribunals are unfair because they do not permit the prisoners to see the evidence against them or allow them access to legal counsel. The International Committee of the Red Cross has accused the US military of using tactics "tantamount to torture" on prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, a claim the Pentagon rejects. Judge Green focused on the concept of "enemy combatants," and she posed a series of hypothetical scenarios to Mr Boyle over who could be considered an enemy combatant. In one answer, Mr Boyle said an old woman in Switzerland who unknowingly gave money to an Afghan charity that passed the money to Al Qaeda could be viewed as an enemy combatant and therefore could be jailed and subject to a military tribunal. "The Government showed its true colours today," said Barbara Olshansky of the Centre for Constitutional Rights, one of the attorneys who argued for the prisoners. "If under this definition of enemy combatant a Swiss granny who gave money to charity can be detained indefinitely at Guantanamo, then anyone who unintentionally acts in a way the Government finds suspicious is in danger of losing their freedom," she said.

More than 500 people are being held at Guantanamo Bay, after being detained during the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan and in other operations in the US "war against terrorism". Most of the suspected Al Qaeda members and Taliban fighters being held at the facility have not been charged or named as eligible for trial in a military tribunal. The tribunals, formally called military commissions, were authorised by President George W Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. Thomas Wilner, one of the detainees' lawyers, cited a Supreme Court ruling in June that terror suspects had the right to use the US judicial system to contest their confinement. "The world is waiting to see if American justice can work," Mr Wilner said.

Joe Margulies, an attorney representing another prisoner, said the current military system to determine whether or how to charge the prisoners was inadequate. "The (tribunals) are the perfect storm of procedural inadequacy," he said. "The evidence against most prisoners consists largely of uncorroborated statements made to their interrogators."
Link


Terror Networks & Islam
US allows use of evidence gained by torture
2004-12-04
Evidence gained by torture can be used by the US military review panels deciding the fate of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, the US Government has conceded. Lawyers acting for Australian detainees in Cuba have called on the Australian Government to renounce the practice. About 70 years ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled evidence gained through torture was inadmissible. Deputy associate Attorney-General, Brian Boyle, has told the District Court in Washington DC, that the Guantanamo review panels are allowing such evidence. Michael Ratner, a human right lawyer with the Centre for Constitutional Rights, says he was shocked with the Bush administration's admission. "Never in my 30 years of being a human rights lawyer would I ever expected to be in the state that we've arrived at," he said.

Mr Ratner says the Howard Government must condemn torture and the use of evidence produced from it. Two Australians, Mamdouh Habib and David Hicks, are being held at Guantanamo Bay. The US military lawyer appointed to defend Hicks, says the Australian Government should do more to ensure his client gets a fair trial. He says Mr Hicks will not get a fair trial before the Commission and the Australian Government is not doing anything about it. He says there must be rules of evidence. "This Military Commission system is designed to allow evidence that could have been obtained under torture to be used as evidence against people," he said. "Rules of evidence and procedures have been designed to keep uncredible evidence out and credible evidence in". Maj Mori says Australia should protest against the Commission process like Britain has and hold an inquiry into its legal standards. Major Michael Mori is in Melbourne for a seminar on legal tactics.
Link


Europe
Muslim group wants Cadbury boycott
2004-06-27
British Muslims are calling for a boycott of chocolate giant Cadbury because of alleged links with the American firm accused of torturing prisoners in Iraq. The UK Islamic Mission made the shock plea as the Bournville-based company has previously employed business advisers CACI Ltd. The firm, which has offices in Coventry, is a subsidiary of US firm CACI International, which was hired by the CIA and coordinated interrogations at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. Iraqi inmates at the prison were stripped, chained, sexually humiliated and threatened with electrocution by US guards.There have also been allegations of rape and murder. Last night, Haq Ghani, of the UK Islamic Mission, called for a boycott of up to 40 UK firms, including Cadbury, who have links with CACI Ltd. “It is very concerning that a notorious organisation such as CACI is involved in any way with household names and companies which the Muslim community use,”he said. “Many Muslims will boycott these organisations and take peaceful action to protest, such as picketing their headquarters. There should be a boycott of any organisation which works with a company involved in state terrorism. I would call on people who oppose the war on Iraq to boycott these firms.”

But a spokesman for Cadbury said the company was no longer using the services of CACI Ltd. He said:“I believe that the firm did offer us some advice to assist the process of integrating our retail sales force with that of Trebor Bassett. But that was three or four years ago and we have not used their services since.” But the Sunday Mercury discovered more recent links between Cadbury and the firm. On March 4, Rafik Chafekar, sales operations Manager at Cadbury, was a guest speaker at a CACI conference in Buckinghamshire. The seminar was also attended by other company clients including Honda, Renault, Barclays, Scottish Widows, AXA Direct, Friends Provident, House of Fraser, The Woolwich, Unilever, Danone, WH Smith, the Royal Mail, Peugeot, 02 and British Gas. A class action lawsuit was filed earlier this month in the US by the New York based Centre for Constitutional Rights, who are accusing CACI International of conspiring to ‘direct and conduct a scheme of torture, rape, and in some instances, summarily execute plaintiffs’. Approximately 1,000 Iraqis are involved in the action.

In an earlier interview, Dr Jack London, the president of CACI International, said he found ‘the erroneous information that has been circulating regarding CACI’s involvement in the Abu Ghraib prison deeply offensive’. He claimed the company was “working diligently to uncover the truth and fully cooperating with all government investigations as well as conducting our own internal analysis.” He added: “The company has never, and never will, condone or tolerate illegal or inappropriate behaviour by any employee when conducting CACI business.” In Britain, CACI Ltd mainly provides strategic business advice to its high-profile clients. Renault has retained the services of CACI in the UK since last July. It refused to comment about the boycott calls last night.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More