Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Britain seeks to turn up heat |
2007-03-31 |
Military strikes have a poor track record as a way to rescue hostages, leaving Britain with little choice but to ratchet up diplomatic and economic pressure as it tries to free 15 sailors and marines seized by Iran last week. Prime Minister Tony Blair is under increasing pressure to act more forcefully after a leading British newspaper slammed the early response to the Iranian seizure as "pusillanimous." British diplomats pressed ahead yesterday for a U.N. statement "deploring" the seizure and calling for the immediate release of the detainees. British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett also has appealed for support from Britain's partners in the European Union and from allies in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia and Oman. "Blair's preference, indeed best hope, is probably the U.N.," said Simon Henderson, director of the Persian Gulf and energy policy program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, in an analysis of the standoff. Military analysts say history suggests that neither a surgical strike nor a massive military retaliation has a high likelihood of achieving the primary objective of freeing the hostages. A U.S. Special Forces mission to rescue the more than 50 American hostages seized in the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Iran misfired disastrously, contributing to the political downfall of President Carter. Tracy Dove, a professor of history and international relations at the University of New York in Prague, points to a more recent example: Israel's 34-day war in Lebanon last summer. For all the damage inflicted on fighters of the militant Shi'ite Hezbollah movement during the war, Israel never managed to win the freedom of two Israeli soldiers whose capture in a cross-border raid ignited the conflict. "War conducted for the sake of liberating hostages rarely achieves its objectives, so this is not an option, despite the rhetoric," Mr. Dove said. Mr. Blair told a British television interviewer yesterday that London has a "whole series of measures we can take," both at the United Nations and within the European Union, to pressure Iran. "I'm not interested in confrontation for its own sake," he added, "The most important thing is to get the 15 personnel back safe and sound." Britain, which has diplomatic relations with Tehran, has frozen bilateral contacts in the wake of the seizure, but a full rupture of formal ties is considered unlikely for the moment. Former Foreign Secretary Malcolm Rifkind, speaking in the House of Commons this week, said Britain should pressure its European allies, many with extensive energy and trade ties to Iran, to suspend or cancel export credits to Iran. The Bush administration has strongly backed Britain in the crisis, which erupted while the United States was beefing up its naval presence in the region. The United States also is pressing Tehran to suspend its suspect nuclear programs and has put out tentative diplomatic feelers to Iran over stabilizing the security situation in Iraq. Undersecretary of State R. Nicholas Burns told a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing yesterday that the captured British sailors and marines were "entirely innocent" and were not operating in Iranian waters, as Tehran charges. But, Mr. Burns added, "We are most definitely on a diplomatic track [with Iran]. We do not believe that conflict is inevitable." Despite intense press speculation, Iran has denied any link between the capture of the British servicemen and five Iranians seized by U.S. forces in the Iraqi city of Irbil in January. Iran claims the five were diplomats, but U.S. military officials say they have evidence the Iranians were actively supporting militants. A senior U.S. official, briefing reporters in London on background yesterday, said London and Washington were united in rejecting any prisoner swap. "I don't think it's ever a good thing to create exchanges of hostages," the official said, according to a Reuters news agency report. |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Iran: British sailors treated in humane manner |
2007-03-28 |
![]() "They are in complete good health. They have been treated based on humanitarian and moral values," Hosseini told the Associated Press. The spokesman, however, did not elaborate on where the Britons were being kept, saying their case is under investigation. "The case should go through legal procedures. Media hyperbole will not lead to a hasty resolution of the case," Hosseini reiterated. Tehran has said it is questioning the Britons to determine if their entry into Iranian waters was "intentional or unintentional" before making a decision on the Brits. Meanwhile, British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Tuesday expressed hope diplomacy would win their release but was prepared to move to a different phase if not. "I hope we manage to get them (the Iranian government) to realize they have to release them," Blair said in an interview with GMTV. Also on Tuesday, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett repeated her government's interest in a quick resolution to the crisis, telling reporters in Turkish city of Ankara that the matter should be settled "swiftly and peacefully." "We will continue to leave the door open for a constructive outcome of these difficulties between Iran and the United Kingdom," Margaret Beckett said. |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran | |
British sailors being interrogated: Iran | |
2007-03-26 | |
TEHERAN - Fifteen British navy personnel seized by Iran last week are currently being interrogated and will have to answer to allegations they violated Iranian waters, an Iranian official said on Monday.
Mostafavis comments came as Iraqs Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said in a statement issued in Baghdad that the Britons were detained while operating in Iraqi waters as London has already claimed. The 15 were seized on Friday in the Shatt Al Arab waterway in the northern Gulf that divides Iraq and Iran. The British sailors are currently being interrogated and must clarify whether they entered Iranian waters deliberately or by mistake, the Iranian official said. When it becomes clear, a decision will be made, he added. Mostafavi denied reports that Iran wanted to exchange the British sailors with Iranians seized by US forces in the northern Iraqi city of Arbil in January. Britains ambassador to Teheran, Geoffrey Adams, met a senior Iranian foreign ministry official on Sunday seeking a meeting with the detained service personnel, 14 men and one woman. He was seeking another meeting with Iranian officials on Monday, the British embassy said. | |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
''We want them back'', Beckett tells Iran |
2007-03-24 |
(KUNA) -- British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett tonight demanded Iran provide a "full explanation" for the detention of 15 British servicemen seized in Iraqi waters. The Foreign Secretary said in a statement "We are disturbed to learn that some 15 Royal Navy and Royal Marines personnel and their equipment have been detained by the Iranians today. We understand that they were in two boats that were operating in Iraqi waters in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1723 in support of the government of Iraq to stop smuggling. So the Iranian Ambassador was summoned to the (British) Foreign Office this afternoon and seen by our Permanent Secretary Sir Peter Ricketts. And we also raised the incident in Tehran through our ambassador there." "We have asked for a full explanation on what has happened and we are leaving them in no doubt that we want the immediate and safe return of our personnel and their equipment. I understand that the meeting with the Iranian Ambassador was brisk but polite. But he was left in no doubt that we want them back", Beckett concluded. |
Link |
Africa Horn |
Missing Britons' bullet-ridden vehicles found in Ethiopia |
2007-03-06 |
MEKELE, Ethiopia -- British investigators looking into the disappearance of a group of Britons affiliated with their country's embassy examined two abandoned, bullet-riddled embassy cars in a remote Ethiopian village Monday. An Associated Press television cameraman saw the two vehicles in Hamedali, the last staging post before the region's famous salt lakes. Bullet holes lined the doors of the vehicles, which still had luggage, shoes and mobile phones inside. No blood was visible. British investigators at the scene refused to comment. In London, the Foreign Office confirmed the cars were part of the missing Britons' convoy. The tour group, which included 13 Ethiopian drivers and translators, went missing Thursday while traveling in Ethiopia's Afar region, a barren expanse of salt mines and volcanoes 800 kilometers northeast of the capital, Addis Ababa. The Britons are employees of the British Embassy in Addis Ababa or their relatives. There was no word on who was behind the kidnapping. "If, as has been speculated, the group is being held against their will, it may be they have been victims of mistaken identity," Bob Dewar, the British ambassador to Ethiopia, said in the Ethiopian capital Monday. Teams in London and Ethiopia were doing everything possible to get the facts, he added. Two residents of Mekele, which at 100 kilometers from Hamedali is the nearest large town, said they had seen members of Britain's elite special operations forces. They spoke on condition anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue but were familiar with military matters. British media, citing unnamed defense officials in London, reported that planning was under way for a possible military rescue operation. Britain's The Guardian newspaper, citing unnamed defense sources, reported that two British special forces soldiers, described as being in a "liaison" role, were in the area. The Independent newspaper said British special forces in the region were preparing for an armed rescue should diplomatic efforts fail. The Times said the British Ministry of Defense had been asked to draw up a hostage-rescue plan soon after the five disappeared. "We can't comment on anything like that," said a Foreign Office press office in London, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with department policy. British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett refused to go into details of the investigation, saying "the safety of those people is of paramount importance to all of us." The Foreign Office also refused to comment on reports that British officials were seeking to contact Ethiopians in the group who either escaped or were released. Late Saturday, the state-run Ethiopian News Agency said five of the 13 Ethiopians in the group were found near the border with Eritrea. Communication and travel into Afar are extremely difficult. The region is not heavily traveled by foreigners -- in part because of its proximity to Ethiopia's disputed border with archrival Eritrea -- although the moonlike landscape draws adventure tourists. Travelers are required to have armed guards. Two Ethiopian government officials have said Eritrea was responsible, which Eritrea denies. On Sunday, Ethiopian officials downplayed the allegations, saying they were still investigating. |
Link |
Afghanistan | |
Bomb blast in Afghanistan kills 3, hurts 48 | |
2007-03-02 | |
A roadside bomb in western Afghanistan left three civilians dead and 48 wounded, including 10 children, officials said on Thursday. The blast targeted a passing police vehicle in the city of Farah, killing the civilians, wounding 10 children and dozens of construction workers, said Mohammad Qasem Bayan, the chief of public health department for Farah province.
In southern Helmand province on Wednesday, residents discovered the body of a doctor, who was kidnapped and killed by suspected Taliban militants earlier in the week, said Gen Mohammad Eisah, provinces deputy police chief. Meanwhile, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett visited the southern Afghan province of Helmand where thousands of British troops are deployed to fight the Taliban, a statement said. | |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Al-Qaeda: U.S. warns Pakistan on aid cut? |
2007-02-27 |
United States Vice-President Dick Cheney made an unannounced visit here for a few hours for talks with President Pervez Musharraf on Monday. The Pakistani Foreign Ministry said the talks covered "our bilateral relations, Afghanistan, and counter-terrorism co-operation". The spokesperson said she had no other details about the talks. The New York Times reported from Washington hours after the visit that Mr. Cheney delivered an "unusually tough message" to Gen. Musharraf, with the warning that the new Democratic Congress would cut aid to Pakistan unless he showed results in hunting down the Al-Qaeda from suspected safe havens on the border with Afghanistan. A day earlier, the same newspaper reported that the White House had concluded that Gen. Musharraf was not living up to earlier commitments that Pakistan's peace agreements with tribal militants in North and South Waziristan were not at the cost of the military efforts against Al-Qaeda. U.S intelligence officials now assess that terrorist infrastructure in these tribal areas on Pakistan's north-west is being rebuilt, the newspaper reported. A few hours after Mr. Cheney left here for Kabul, the Foreign Ministry said Pakistan had adopted a "comprehensive" approach to the problems in the tribal areas that covered "military action where necessary" and political and economic action, including development activities. Spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam denied Pakistan would take military action in those areas at the behest of Washington to pre-empt a Taliban spring offensive in southern Afghanistan, saying "Pakistan does not take dictation from anybody, any force". Mr. Cheney's visit coincided with that of British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett, who praised Pakistan's contributions in the "war on terror", and said she had discussed ways of strengthening this co-operation in her talks with Gen. Musharraf and Foreign Minister Khurshid Kasuri. All countries involved in the war in Afghanistan needed to more to fight Talibanisation, Ms. Beckett said at a joint press conference with Mr. Kasuri. |
Link |
Iraq |
Britain may hand over Basra in spring |
2007-01-25 |
British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett revealed Wednesday that her nation may turn over control of the Iraqi city of Basra to local authorities soon. Speaking at the first complete House of Commons debate on the situation in Iraq since 2004, Beckett said that by spring British forces could be withdrawn from Basra as a first-step maneuver, the Kuwait News Agency KUNA reported. "We remain confident that at some point this spring we will be able to recommend that Basra province too is ready for this process of transition," she said. "We have told the House (of Commons) over and over again we are not setting, never have set and never will set, because we think it would be dangerous and irresponsible, a specific date, a specific deadline or specific timeline." Following the exchange of power in Basra, Beckett said that Britain could then potentially hand over control in all 18 Iraqi provinces to area officials by November. |
Link |
Iraq |
Basra operation to be completed in weeks -Blair: Yorktown? |
2007-01-10 |
![]() "There has been an operation that the British have been conducting in Basra over the past few months which will be completed in the next few weeks," Blair said, adding he would then discuss future British policy in Iraq with parliament. "British policy in Iraq... remains as it has been in the weeks leading up to today. Once the operation in Basra is properly concluded...I think it would be appropriate for me to report back to the House and I would be happy to do that." Blair's comments suggest an earlier handover than had been previously thought. British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said in November last year that Britain could hand over control of Basra to the Iraqi government in spring 2007. |
Link |
Iraq | |
Comments on the death penalty for Saddam Hussein | |
2006-12-30 | |
------ "Saddam Hussein's execution comes at the end of a difficult year for the Iraqi people and for our troops. Bringing Saddam Hussein to justice will not end the violence in Iraq, but it is an important milestone on Iraq's course to becoming a democracy that can govern, sustain and defend itself, and be an ally in the war on terror." - President Bush. ------ "Saddam was treated with respect when he was alive and after his death. Saddam's execution was 100 percent Iraqi and the American side did not interfere." - National Security adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie. ------ "An execution is always tragic news, reason for sadness, even in the case of a person who is guilty of grave crimes." -The Rev. Federico Lombardi, spokesman for the Holy See. ------ Saddam's execution punishes "a crime with another crime. ... The death penalty is not a natural death. And no one can give death, not even the state." - Cardinal Renato Martino, Pope Benedict XVI's top prelate for justice issues. ------ "The test of a government's commitment to human rights is measured by the way it treats its worst offenders. History will judge these actions harshly." - Richard Dicker, director of Human Rights Watch's International Justice Program. ------ "Saddam is paying the price for murdering tens of thousands of Iraqis. This is an unprecedented feeling of happiness. ... Nothing matches it, no festival or marriage or birth." - Abu Sinan, a resident of Sadr City, Baghdad's impoverished Shiite slum. ------ "The country is being plunged into violence and is essentially on the edge of large-scale civil conflict. The execution of Saddam Hussein may lead to the further aggravation of the military-political atmosphere and an increase in ethnic and religious tension." - Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin. ------ "This is an unfair verdict and if Saddam is executed or not ... he will remain a symbol and no one can delete it, neither the Iraqi government nor the Americans." - Muhssin Ali Mohammed of Tikrit, Saddam's hometown. ------ "He got his last prayer. He got his last meal. I'm assuming he was probably able to talk to his family. And that's something my husband didn't get and something thousands of other soldiers didn't get." - Stephanie Dostie, whose husband, Sgt. 1st Class Shawn Christopher Dostie, was killed by an explosive device a year ago. ------ "Given the crime blamed on Saddam, it is unfair if George Bush is not also put on an international tribunal. Saddam was executed for killings 148 people, Shiite Muslims, while Bush is responsible for the killing of about 600,000 Iraqis since the March 2003 invasion." - Fauzan Al Anshori of the militant group of Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia. ------ "Saddam Hussein was a brutal tyrant and murderous dictator. Now it is time for the people of Iraq to work to reconcile their differences and to heal the wounds of the past. Only that process will end the violence that has prevented Iraq from moving forward." - Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass. ------ Saddam has "now been held to account for at least some of the appalling crimes he committed against the Iraqi people." - British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett. ------ "It will not increase our moral authority in the world. ... Saddam's heinous crimes against humanity can never be diminished, but he was our ally while he was doing it. ... Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth will make us blind and disfigured. ... Saddam as a war trophy only deepens the catastrophe to which we are indelibly linked." - the Rev. Jesse Jackson. ------ "It is not a great day for democracy and democrats. Barbarity has to be fought by other means than barbarity. There were other ways to punish the abominable acts of Saddam Hussein." - Louis Michel, European Union commissioner for development and humanitarian aid. | |
Link |
Down Under |
Australia Won't Set Iraq Troops Timeline |
2006-11-25 |
![]() Nelson spoke after British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett on Wednesday became her government's first minister to set even a vague target for handing over security in Basra to Iraqi security forces. Beckett said she was confident the transition could take place by spring but officials stressed that this was a hope, not a timetable. "We are not setting any specific timeline," Nelson told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio. "Our plan for the next year is to move for regional provincial Iraqi control for the south of Iraq. We will expect to have a continued presence through much of next year in the south of Iraq." Australia's 1,400 personnel in Iraq include 500 troops in the Overwatch Battle Group, which provide backup support for Iraqi forces responsible for security in the southern provinces of Muthanna and Dhi Qar. Nelson said he expected there would be a continuing need for coalition support in southern Iraq, particularly in training of Iraqi forces. "If for some reason we were to change our role as we have done over the last six months ... we would expect even more emphasis on training," Nelson said. "At this stage we have no intention at all of reducing our troop numbers although we may, depending on circumstances next year, alter the role." |
Link |
Iraq |
British troops can leave Iraq next year: Talabani |
2006-09-06 |
![]() "I don't think fighting will continue until then if the steps of national reconciliation go according to plan. If some groups are still fighting then, our forces will be able to take care of it," he said. "We've achieved good success in building our forces and equipping them with the neccessary arms." Beckett was cautious however. "The president (Talabani) is not setting a deadline" for a withdrawal, she said. "That is the president's personal opinion... the circumstances will be the judge of everything. If the president is right about the accelleration off the peace process no one will be more happy than us," she said. |
Link |