International-UN-NGOs |
UN ordered to pay legal fees of oil-for-food chief |
2009-02-12 |
Looks like Benon will have to keep using the stairs... UNITED NATIONS -- The U.N.'s highest internal judicial body has ordered the United Nations to pay legal fees to the former chief of its oil-for-food program, who has been accused of accepting money to illegally influence the $64 billion humanitarian program in Iraq. The program was the biggest humanitarian program in U.N. history, but a U.N.-sanctioned investigation found widespread corruption, involving thousands of parties, that bilked the humanitarian program of $1.8 billion. The program chief, Benon Sevan, has been charged with bribery and conspiracy to commit wire fraud for allegedly accepting $160,000 to illegally influence the program. The Administrative Tribunal's judgment, obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, said the United Nations must pay "all reasonable legal fees" incurred by Sevan until February 2005, subject to an independent audit of the lawyers' invoices. The judgment said Sevan and his lawyers were seeking $880,300, plus interest. Under the oil-for-food program, which ran from 1996 to 2003, Iraq was allowed to sell oil provided most of the money went to buy humanitarian goods. It was aimed at easing Iraqi suffering under U.N. sanctions imposed after Saddam's 1990 invasion of Kuwait and was a lifeline for 90 percent of the country's population. But a 18-month U.N.-sanctioned investigation led by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker found massive corruption in the program. Its final report in October 2005 accused more than 2,200 companies from some 40 countries of colluding with Saddam Hussein's regime to bilk the humanitarian program of $1.8 billion. In 2004, it accused Sevan of accepting $147,184 in kickbacks for steering oil-for-food contracts to a company of his choice. At the time, the U.N. agreed to pay Sevan's legal fees. But when the investigation accused then-Secretary-General Kofi Annan of a role in the scandal, Annan reversed the payment decision. You're dead to me, Benon! Dead! Annan then rejected the ruling when the U.N. Joint Appeals Board upheld Sevan's appeal in February 2006. You took sides against the family, Benon. We can't have that. You're lucky you're not in a 55 gallon drum... Sevan took his case to the Administrative Tribunal, which ordered the U.N. to pay reasonable legal fees in its judgment dated Nov. 26, 2008. Both the appeals court and the tribunal said it had no evidence that Annan's chief-of-staff ever imposed conditions on the payment agreement. Ummmm...nope. We know that because he told us he didn't. "We abide by all the decisions of the Administrative Tribunal, which is the highest appeals body within the U.N. system," said U.N. associate spokesman Farhan Haq. Harrrrumph harrrrumph harrrrumph... Sevan resigned from the U.N. in 2005 and returned to his native Cyprus. He has not been extradited to the United Nations. Can you be extradited to the United Nations? I dunno, let's ask Carla del Ponte ... In January 2007, federal and state prosecutors charged Sevan with taking a $160,000 bribe to influence who could buy Iraqi oil under the oil-for-food program. The indictment charged Sevan with bribery and conspiracy to commit fraud. It ain't your night, Benon. We're goin for the price on Wilson... At the time, his lawyer, Eric Lewis, said Sevan was being made a political scapegoat and that he had accounted for every penny, helping to save "tens of thousands of innocent people from death by disease and starvation." It was "for the children", right, Benny? |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
US legislators want Cyprus to extradite Benon Sevan |
2007-02-14 |
Two U.S. legislators asked Cyprus on Tuesday to extradite Benon Sevan, a former U.N. official charged with accepting a bribe in connection with the oil-for-food program for Iraq. Sevan, 69, the former head of the now-defunct $64 billion program is the only U.N. official charged by U.S. federal prosecutors for wrongdoing in the oil-for-food plan. He is accused of receiving some $160,000 through an intermediary. But as recently as last week, a Cypriot government official said in Nicosia said there had been no request for Sevan's extradition and that the island had laws prohibiting extradition of its nationals to third countries. The two lawmakers were Rep. Tom Lantos, a California Democratic who chairs the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, and the committee's ranking Republican, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida. In a letter to Andreas Kakouri, the Cypriot ambassador in the United States, e-mailed to reporters, the members of Congress said Cyprus' membership in the European Union was seen as "heralding a new era of international cooperation by your country." |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs | ||
Benon Sevan indicted in oil-for-food | ||
2007-01-16 | ||
![]()
| ||
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
Ex-U.N. oil-for-food chief charged |
2007-01-16 |
Tough choice: "UN" or "Lurid Crime Tales"... NEW YORK - The former United Nations oil-for-food chief was charged Tuesday with bribery and conspiracy to commit wire fraud for his role in the scandal-tainted humanitarian program. At the UN, it's "Scandal Tainted". The charges against Benon Sevan, 69, of Nicosia, Cyprus, were contained in a rewrite of an indictment stemming from the scandal over the operation set up from 1996 to 2003 to permit the Iraqi government to sell oil primarily to buy food and medicine for suffering Iraqis. Looks like you'll have to keep using the stairs, Benon. There's probably an elevator shaft with your name on it. The program was designed to help Iraqis cope with U.N. sanctions, but authorities said it was corrupted by bureaucrats, oil tycoons and Saddam Hussein after the former Iraqi leader was allowed to choose the buyers of Iraqi oil and the sellers of humanitarian goods. Sevan, who had worked for the U.N. for 40 years, has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Federal and state prosecutors also announced the indictment of Ephraim Nadler, 79, of Manhattan, on the same charges. He helped a coconspirator obtain the right to buy Iraqi oil under the program in exchange for commissions from the oil sales and then funneled approximately $160,000 of these oil commissions to Sevan, the indictment said. Nadler is the brother-in-law of former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali. U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia said the United States has lodged warrants for the arrest of both men with Interpol and will seek their arrest and extradition to the United States. FBI Assistant Director Mark J. Mershon said the indictment brings to 14 the number of individuals charged in the case. Since 2004, Sevan has been the subject of a U.N.-backed probe of fraud and waste in the $64 billion operation. Eric Lewis, a lawyer for Sevan, did not immediately return a telephone message for comment. In August 2005, a U.N.-appointed investigating committee pursuing claims of fraud and waste in the program accused Sevan of a conflict of interest in his handling of oil-for-food contracts. Sevan resigned from the U.N. that same month and returned to his native Cyprus. The U.N. investigating committee also accused him of accepting some $147,000 in kickbacks for steering the contracts to a company of his choice. Benon, they got you for chump change, man... On Feb. 22, South Korean businessman Tongsun Park is scheduled to be sentenced for his conviction on charges he accepted at least $2 million to serve Iraq's interests in the scandal. He could face up to five years in prison. Hey, Tongsun Park. The Zelig of international corruption... Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen Miller told the jury in Park's trial last July that Park was part of a decade-long conspiracy to bring about the lifting of sanctions imposed on Iraq after it invaded Kuwait and brought about the first Gulf War. Miller said Park used his relationship with former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali to join an effort by Samir A. Vincent, an Iraqi-American, to earn the favor of Iraq and share as much as $45 million in windfall gains if the sanctions were lifted. Vincent, who testified against Park, has pleaded guilty to federal charges and is cooperating with the government. He testified that Park arranged meetings during 1993 with himself, Boutros-Ghali and Vincent. Miller told the jury that Park and Vincent arranged a 1993 meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, with Boutros-Ghali and Tariq Aziz, then Iraq's deputy foreign minister, and Barzan al-Tikriti, the half brother of Saddam who then was the Iraqi ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva. I see Boutros-Boutrous mentioned here a lot. They gonna go after him? Yeah, I didn't think so... Several others accused in the conspiracy are awaiting trial, including Texas oilman Oscar S. Wyatt Jr., who has pleaded not guilty. Be a standup guy, Benon. Don't go against the family. Take it like a man... |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
UN staff claim school fees for phantom offspring, defraud IRS |
2006-10-08 |
![]() These are just two of the scams to be revealed in a book by Edwin Nhliziyo, chief auditor of the UNs peacekeeping division until his retirement. His account aims to expose how the UN is losing hundreds of millions of pounds through corruption and fraud. From Kuwait to Cambodia and from Congo to New York, Nhliziyo says, employees were on the take. Some top officials turned a blind eye, he alleges, and conducted campaigns of dirty tricks against auditors such as himself who tried to stop the corruption. I am a believer in the UN, but like 90% of the serving staff members I think member states have allowed a handful of people to abuse the organisation. It is for this reason that I wrote my book, Nlizhiyo said. In 1996 he became one of the first auditors to examine the Iraq oil for food programme. But Nlizhiyo says he was pulled off the project before he could investigate further. In his book, he tells of two colleagues who went on a trip in 2001 to examine how funds were being spent on the programme. They uncovered incidents of mismanagement and possible fraud, he said. However, when a draft of their report was sent to Benon Sevan, then programme director, he is said to have retorted: If you had spent more time in the field auditing and not sleeping in hotel rooms, you would have found all the answers to your questions. The audit report never went out. But the auditors got their revenge when an inquiry into the scandal by Paul Volcker, the former US Federal Reserve chairman, accused Sevan of accepting cash bribes of up to $160,000. Sevan denied the charges. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
The U.N.s Day in Court |
2006-06-29 |
Oil-for-Food hits a New York courtroom. By Claudia Rosett While United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has already dismissed the Oil-for-Food scandal as over and done, within the wood-paneled walls of a Manhattan courtroom it has just come to life. The opening this week of the first federal trial linked to the U.N.s former relief program for Iraq has transformed the distant saga of sanctions busting and stolen billions into an up-close drama, with prosecutors alleging that Saddam Hussein, in his efforts to shake off U.N. sanctions, reached via a secret back channel all the way from Baghdad right into Washington, New York, and the U.N. executive suite. The defendant, South Korean businessman Tongsun Park, is charged in the Southern District of New York with acting as an unregistered agent of Saddams Iraq which tried through various means, especially the manipulation of the 1996-2003 Oil-for-Food program, to end the U.N. sanctions imposed after Saddams 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Parks lawyer, Michael Kim, says the 71-year-old Park is absolutely not guilty. Whatever the outcome for Park, his trial expected to last about three weeks looks likely to provide an unprecedented view into the workings of U.N. backroom politics. Not least, this comes as a timely warning to beware whatever might be going on today in any back channels the U.N. might have opened with nuclear-happy, sanctions-threatened, oil-rich Iran. In an opening statement Tuesday, federal prosecutor Michael Farbiarz told the jury that Iraqi agents had been working since 1991 to try to eliminate the sanctions, to try and create a major exception to them on the way to wholesale elimination. For five years, Iraq worked without success. But starting in 1996, alleged Farbiarz, The Iraqi cash began flowing to Tongsun Park. It flowed all year long. Sure enough, by the end of that year the Iraqis got their multibillion dollar exception to the UN sanctions, the so-called Oil-for-Food program. Alleging that Cash by the bagful was sent from Iraq to the United States and doled out here by an Iraqi agent to Tongsun Park, Farbiarz outlined a tale of secret swaps of messages and money in New York cafes and restaurants; night-time meetings at the Sutton Place official residence of former Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali; a close encounter with longtime U.N. eminence Maurice Strong, who served as a top adviser to both Boutros-Ghali and then to Kofi Annan; and an episode in which Park in 1997 picked up cash from Saddams number two man in Iraq, Tariq Aziz, and drove out of the Iraqi desert over the Jordanian border. (Boutros-Ghali, Strong, and Annan have all denied any wrong-doing in relation to Oil-for-Food.) Parks lawyer, Kim, waved aside the prosecutions version of events as sounding like a Tom Clancy novel. Park, he said, was simply a middleman, a facilitator, like everybody else who was involved in the Oil-for-Food program. Positing that the bigger picture was much more complicated than prosecutors would have you believe, Kim promised to map out a web of connections including prominent Republicans who hob-nobbed with the same Iraqi agent alleged to have passed envelopes and bags of cash to Park, and Texas oil companies that saw in Oil-for-Food a huge money-making opportunity. The biggest eye-opener in the trial so far is the hob-nobbing Iraqi agent, Samir Vincent, 65-years-old, with a shock of silver-gray hair, who on Tuesday took the stand. Born in Baghdad, Vincent became a naturalized U.S. citizen around 1971. Having done substantial business with Iraq over the years, including under Oil-for-Food, he was arrested in January 2005 on federal charges including engaging in prohibited financial transactions with the government of Iraq, and acting as an unregistered agent of Iraq. He pleaded guilty before the same judge now presiding over the Park trial, Denny Chin, and became a cooperating witness. Speaking in a firm voice, with only a slight accent to suggest his Iraqi origins, Vincent in his testimony on Tuesday outlined a web of connections that led him over many years, via Baghdad and Washington, to Tongsun Park. He came to the U.S. in the late 1950s to attend Boston College, and eventually went into business for himself, in Virginia, just outside Washington. In 1984, he met the then-ambassador of Iraq, Nizar Hamdoon, an alumnus of the same Jesuit high school that Vincent had attended as a young man in Baghdad. They became good friends. Vincent began doing business with Iraq, where Hamdoon by 1990 had become deputy foreign minister. Vincent was in Baghdad when Saddam invaded Kuwait and the U.N. imposed sanctions. In the aftermath, Vincent by his own account became a conduit for messages and money from Baghdad, as Saddams regime sought to slip out from under those sanctions. In the early 1990s, according to Vincent, this entailed a variety of schemes centered in Washington that simply flopped. In early 1992, he said, he hooked up with a Washington lobbyist, William E. Timmons, who had served as a congressional liaison in the Reagan administration. (Timmons did not return a call yesterday to his office at his Washington firm, Timmons and Company, where he is now listed as Chairman Emeritus). Vincent said that with the help of Timmons, he tried a number of approaches to the State Department, including a request to see John Bolton, currently the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., then assistant secretary for international organization affairs at the State Department. That resulted in meetings with deputies of Bolton, said Vincent, But I never had a chance to meet with Bolton himself. According to Vincent, Timmons also helped him approach Elizabeth Dole, then head of the American Red Cross, with a proposal that the Red Cross take part in a plan similar to, but on a smaller scale than, what later coalesced under the U.N. as Oil-for-Food. The idea was that Iraq would be allowed to sell a limited amount of oil to buy food and medicine, all coordinated with the Red Cross. Vincent said his understanding, relayed second-hand through Timmons, was that this project died when then-Secretary of State James Baker looked over the proposal and decided it was a no-no because he thought the Iraqis were trying to circumvent sanctions. Bakers view, according to Vincent, was that if this has any chance, it has to be done under the United Nations auspices. By late 1992, according to Vincent, he and Timmons concluded that the U.S. State Department would not play ball, and Iraq should look directly to the U.N. Thus, Vincent needed access to the upper reaches of the U.N., and it was at that point, he testified Tuesday, that Timmons introduced him to Tongsun Park. Within a few weeks, Park had arranged a meeting for us with the Secretary-General of the United Nations at the United Nations headquarters. On that occasion, according to Vincent, it was only Park who actually went in to speak with Boutros-Ghali; Vincent waited in the outer office. But the stage was set for a series of secret meetings and maneuverings, of which we shall no doubt be hearing more in coming days. Parks lawyer, Michael Kim, who has not yet really begun to fight, may well produce evidence at odds with the picture that the prosecutors and Samir Vincent have begun to present. For public consumption, Tongsun Park appears to have launched his own website, complete with the information that he is a unique personality known around the world, but remains humble and is always an especially gracious host. (His lawyer, in a phone interview Tuesday evening, could not confirm that this is genuinely Parks website, and Park, who is in federal custody, could not be reached for comment.) Even after this very preliminary bout, what jumps out is that, in contrast to the folks at the U.N., at least some of the private players who got caught up in the epic scandal that was Oil-for-Food have by now had to tangle with prosecutors, or at least have been required to face inquiries conducted in broad daylight. Also under federal indictment are a number of Saddams former business partners, who face trial in the Southern District of New York this November. In Australia, the Cole Commission has been delving in public hearings into misconduct under Oil-for-Food. But at the U.N. itself, which actually ran Oil-for-Food, not a single official involved in the administration of the program, from Kofi Annan on down, has been required to come forth and tell, in public, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Top U.N. officials have declined invitations to testify at congressional hearings and stonewalled questions from the press. They have tucked under the rug of diplomatic immunity and silence a great many loose ends left by Paul Volckers U.N.-authorized probe, which covered some of the material now spilling into the New York courtroom, but did all its questioning in secret and is now hiding from the public its entire archive of underlying documents. No one at Turtle Bay seems even interested that the former director of Oil-for-Food, Benon Sevan, alleged by Volcker to have taken $147,000 in payoffs on Iraqi oil deals, is protesting innocence, uncontested, receiving full U.N. pension and living on Cyprus. Watching Tongsun Park's trial begin on Tuesday, and listening to testimony that is opening one can of worms after another, I had to wonder, were the U.N. subject to a similar standard of law, what might we learn? |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
Claudia Rosett lunches with Benon Sevan |
2006-04-01 |
from the Wall Street Journal's OpinionJournal.com. Free, but registration required. Ms. Rosett calls on the man whose nemesis she is. Read the whole thing -- a nice thing to read on the weekend. If you don't like registering for sites, use BugMeNot.com. 'I Am Not Running Away' Meet Benon Sevan, the man at the center of the Oil for Food scandal. NICOSIA, Cyprus--"Medium or sweet?" asks Benon Sevan. He is inquiring how much sugar I would like in the Turkish coffee he's boiling up for us on his kitchen stove, and I am torn between thanking him for his hospitality and wondering if he might poison the refreshments. For the past three years, we have had a somewhat fraught connection, via a shared interest in the biggest corruption scandal ever to hit the United Nations--he as a star suspect, and I in writing about it. So when, together with a traveling companion, I paid a surprise visit on a recent Sunday afternoon to Mr. Sevan's current home--here in the capital of his native Cyprus--I really had little hope that he would do anything but slam the door on me. This city of old sandstone walls, street cafés and orange trees is where the former head of the U.N. Oil for Food program has been living quietly since he slipped out of New York last year, shortly before he was accused by Paul Volcker's U.N.-authorized investigation of having "corruptly benefited" from the graft-ridden U.N. aid effort for Iraq. Since then, Mr. Sevan's name has been in the news, but the man himself has been all but invisible. He has refused to talk to the press, and he turned away a group of visiting U.S. congressional investigators who knocked on his door last October. The U.N., while paying Mr. Sevan his full pension, has deflected almost all questions about him. He has not been brought before any court of law. As a citizen of Cyprus, he is safe on the island from U.S. extradition, and there is no sign the Cypriot authorities are planning to bring charges against him. Yet the questions abound. It was with trepidation that I approached the nine-story white building where Mr. Sevan now lives... knocked. The tall, bespectacled 69-year-old answered, wearing a gray-and-blue T-shirt, warm-up pants, slippers and a thin gold watch. He recognized me instantly, and protested: "I don't want to talk to you. I have nothing to say." We stared at each other, and he volunteered: "I am not ashamed to look in the mirror when I shave myself." Then: "I am closing the door now." But he didn't...After some more dickering, I finally offered the compromise that I would not ask him to answer questions on the record about Oil for Food. With that, he ushered us into his living room for what turned into a 2 1/2-hour chat. It is a strange limbo in which Mr. Sevan now lives, apparently alone and with a lot of time on his hands. Just three years ago, he was running a multibillion-dollar U.N. operation in Iraq, and together with his wife, Micheline Sevan (who also worked at the U.N.), was renting a midtown Manhattan apartment for $4,370 per month, owned a house in the Hamptons, and was jetting around the world on U.N. business. Today, if Mr. Sevan wishes to remain out of reach of various criminal investigations spawned by Oil for Food, he is basically confined to self-imposed exile on Cyprus. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
The Latest Annan Scam |
2006-03-14 |
![]() United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan has just tabled ostensibly radical proposals for reform, at a proposed cost of more than $510 million, saying he aims to bring efficiency, high ethical standards and above all, transparency to his scandal-tarnished organization. One part of the plan calls for clearing out deadwood in the U.N. Secretariat with buyouts costing about $100,000 per person part of a process that Annan calls "investing in change." Whether Annan's proposals will be adopted by the U.N. General Assembly is far from certain. But the secretary general might be able to make a more inspiring case for change if he started by casting more daylight on the workings and personnel of one of his own pet projects: the Alliance for Civilizations a new U.N. initiative with a nebulous mandate that is now providing berths for an assortment of Annan's old U.N. associates, including his disgraced former chief of staff, Iqbal Riza. What is the Alliance? On the surface, it is simply a rarefied U.N. talking shop, which pays an elite panel of globe-trotting members to meet in comfortable locations around the world and deliver opinions on world peace, especially on frictions between the Islamic world and the West. Launched with relatively little fanfare last fall, the Alliance held its first meeting in November, in the Mediterranean resort of Majorca, Spain, with Riza present to deliver an opening message on Annan's behalf. Its first widely publicized session, however, took place in February when Annan himself citing a need to "create dialogue" sped to a meeting of the Alliance in Doha, Qatar, to talk about the Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad that have been answered by riots among militant Muslims around the world. (Annan had previously issued his views on the cartoon furor during a Middle-East stopover to collect a $500,000 personal prize from the ruler of Dubai.) The resulting statement made no distinction between embassy-burning militants and media cartoonists calling for restraint from all alike, and promising "concrete suggestions" to come. Tasked by Annan to convene a series of meetings worldwide, the Alliance fields a staff of about 10, with its own director, working out of a U.N. office in New York. This office supports the part-time intellectual labors of a panel of 20 un-elected "eminent persons," all appointed by the secretary general. Annan has asked the group to come up by late 2006 just before he is due to retire with a "plan of practical action" to "bridge divides," again, apparently, as they exist between Islamic countries and the West. As it happens, however, the U.N.-appointed Alliance is much less grand than its rhetoric would lead outsiders to believe and much less representative of any international consensus. It is a venture initially generated not by the 191 member states of the U.N. General Assembly, but by just two states, Spain and Turkey, with a handful of other nations Belgium, Luxembourg, Qatar and Syria contributing to its $3.7 million in special funding. The high-profile personnel involved are equally unrepresentative. In choosing the 20 eminences of the Alliance, Annan leaned heavily toward Islamic dignitaries and U.N. has-beens. On the Islamic side, these include a former president of Iran, Mohamed Khatami, and the president of the Alexandria Library, Ismail Serageldin (whose library in 2003 as part of its rotating collection displayed the slanderous anti-Semitic "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"). Among the U.N. types are a former president of the Inter-American Development Bank, a former head of UNESCO, and a former head of the United Nations Population Fund, or UNFPA, now an adviser to Annan. Most interesting, perhaps, is the man Annan has chosen as his personal conduit to the Alliance. This person designated as a "special adviser" to Annan with the U.N.'s third-highest rank of undersecretary general is his own former chief of staff, erstwhile retiree Riza. This is not auspicious. Riza, a Pakistani who served as Annan's chief-of-staff from 1997-2004 and also worked closely with Annan when he served as head of U.N. peacekeeping during the disaster of Rwanda, has been complicit with the secretary general in some of the U.N.'s worst debacles. In the multibillion-dollar Oil-for-Food scandal, Riza was featured as the shredder-in-chief whose office destroyed three year's worth of Annan's executive-suite documents, which Paul Volcker's inquiry had ordered preserved because they were of "potential relevance" to the investigation. But that may be the least of it. During the Oil-for-Food program itself, as Volcker reported in September, 2005, "Mr. Riza played a greater role than he was willing to state." According to Volcker, Riza dealt heavily with the graft-riddled program, meeting with Iraqi officials, and routinely handling important Oil-for-Food documents, some pertaining to corruption in the program. During at least the last two years of Oil-for-Food's seven years in operation, Volcker concluded, Riza along with Annan and the now departing deputy secretary-general, Louise Frechette was aware of both the smuggling and kickback schemes of Saddam, but withheld information from the U.N. Security Council. And in 2003, both Annan and Riza were present at a meeting in which the head of Oil-for-Food, Benon Sevan, suggested falsely to the post-Saddam Iraqi Governing Council that the U.N. had only recently learned of Saddam's 10 percent Oil-for-Food kickback scheme. This falsehood, reports Volcker, "went uncorrected" by Annan and Riza, both of whom had known about the graft for at least two years, or so Volcker concluded from "clear reports" conveyed to their offices on the U.N.'s executive 38th floor. Riza, along with Annan, was also at the epicenter of the U.N.'s failure in 1994 to stop the Rwandan genocide in which more than 800,000 people were murdered. Annan was then the head of U.N. peacekeeping, and Riza was his deputy. Warned of the impending slaughter by the U.N. peacekeepers on the ground, they told the same U.N. peacekeepers in Rwanda not to raid the weapons caches of the Hutu killers who were preparing for slaughter. When the killings then took place, Annan and Riza failed to raise the alarm. Asked in a 1999 PBS interview about these horrors, Riza took the heat, saying he had sent the initial non-intervention order under his own signature before briefing his boss, Annan. Asked whether the U.N. Secretariat had withheld important information about this from the Security Council, Riza replied: "Possibly we did not give all the details." That same pattern of omitted details has been a hallmark of the current Alliance of Civilizations, which was shaped quietly last spring by Riza and another of Annan's special advisers, Giandomenico Picco, who has also been embroiled recently in controversy. A star U.N. diplomat of the 1980s and one of the U.N. negotiators during the early attempts to set up the scandal-riven Oil-for-Food program, Picco left the U.N. in 1992 and went into private business, setting up his own consulting firm, New York-based GDP Associates. Picco was brought back to the U.N. by Annan in 1999 as an undersecretary general to set up and lead the precursor of the Alliance of Civilizations, a U.N. venture called the Dialogue of Civilizations, which had been proposed in 1998 by Iran. When he began work for Annan on the Dialogue in 1999, Picco apparently neglected to disclose a potentially large conflict of interest: He was also serving as chairman of the board of a private company called IHC Services, which at the time was doing millions in business with the U.N. Procurement Division the purchasing department that spends about 85 percent of the U.N.'s core budget, plus billions more on peacekeeping. Picco appears to have resigned his IHC post in early 2000. But his role at IHC, with its potential conflict of interest, was never disclosed by the U.N. It came to light only last year, by way of a FOX News investigation that exposed IHC's close ties to a U.N. procurement officer, Alexander Yakovlev, who has since pleaded guilty in federal court to taking hundreds of thousands worth of bribes on at least scores of millions worth of U.N. contracts. As for the Dialogue project, it served in 2001 as a vehicle for Picco's high-level U.N.-credentialed meetings around the globe, and about the time of the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S., clocked in with a banal report which now resides, largely forgotten, in the U.N. library. Annan continued to retain Picco as a part-time special adviser until early this year, and last spring Picco helped Riza convert the remnants of the Dialogue into the current Alliance. Around the time FOX News broke the U.N. procurement scandal in a story last June mentioning IHC, Picco's direct involvement with the Alliance quietly faded away. But some interesting ties remain. Among the 20 eminent persons named by Annan to the Alliance is one with close business ties to Picco: former Indonesian Foreign Minister Ali Alatas. As recently as last fall, when the Alliance was being launched, Picco's consulting firm, GDP Associates, listed Alatas as one of the associates (although Alatas' biography, as provided by the U.N. Alliance, does not mention this connection). Since then, the GDP Web site has vanished from public view. GDP did not return a call from FOX News asking whether Alatas is still one of Picco's consulting associates. Meanwhile, Riza, according to Annan's office, is working not for a U.N. salary, but at the special rate of $1-per-year. (He already has his full U.N. pension.) If that sounds like a good deal for a U.N. where the secretary general is now trying to invest in change, possibly we have not yet heard all the details. For while Riza is virtually unpaid in his latest responsibilities, what he is actually doing on Annan's behalf remains deeply in the shadows. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
Mr. Sevan, I Presume |
2005-12-28 |
EFL Caludia Rosett, WSJ ![]() Mr. Sevan has not been called to account under any regime of law. Having been retained in New York by Mr. Annan after Oil for Food ended as a $1-a-year "special adviser" to assist in the inquiry into the program, Mr. Sevan skipped town in mid-2005, shortly before Mr. Volcker weighed in with his allegations on Aug. 8 of this year. Since then the U.N. has said that Mr. Sevan, despite the allegations against him, is entitled to collect his U.N. pension--which a spokesman for Mr. Annan confirmed to me again this week is "untouchable." The U.N. will not give out any information on Mr. Sevan's current location. But to such sketchy accounts, investigators for Rep. Henry Hyde's International Relations Committee are now prepared to add some illuminating details--starting with their encounter with Mr. Sevan himself, less than three months ago, in Cyprus. As it happens, they were not expecting to find Mr. Sevan in person. They went to Nicosia, the capital of Cyprus, trying to track down details of the case, including the fate of Mr. Sevan's deceased aunt, Bertouji Zeytountsian. By Mr. Sevan's account to Mr. Volcker, this aunt, while living in Nicosia as a retired government worker on a pension, had sent him funds totaling some $160,000 during the last four years in which he was running Oil for Food, 1999-2003. The day after the U.N. investigation into Oil for Food was announced, in March, 2004, Zeytountsian fell down an elevator shaft in her Cyprus apartment building. A few months later, she died. Mr. Hyde's investigators decided while in Nicosia to have a look at the elevator shaft. On Oct. 14, a Cypriot police official showed them the way to the building. There, printed plainly on a mailbox at the entrance to the apartment block, was the name not of Mr. Sevan's aunt, but of Benon Sevan himself. After shooting the picture shown nearby, the investigators went up to the eighth-floor apartment where the aunt had lived. They knocked, and the door opened. There stood Benon Sevan. As one of the investigators describes it, Mr. Sevan came to the door "in shorts, no shirt, and sandals, smoking a cigar." Apparently everyone was surprised to come thus face-to-face. Mr. Sevan was polite but did not invite them in. They chatted across the threshold. He told the congressional investigators to address all questions to his lawyers, saying, "My conscience is clear." The investigators turned to go, and, as one of them recounts, as they headed for the stairs, Mr. Sevan told them, "You can take the elevator. It's fixed now." The U.N., however, remains broken. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office opened an investigation into Mr. Sevan earlier this spring, and confirmed to me Tuesday that the investigation is continuing, but the New York prosecutor has no jurisdiction in Cyprus and cannot in any event bring charges against Mr. Sevan unless Mr. Annan lifts his diplomatic immunity--which it seems Mr. Annan has not done. A spokeswoman for the Cypriot mission to the U.N. says that "the issue" of Mr. Sevan is "on the desk of the attorney general in Cyprus, who is studying the case." That leaves Henry Hyde's investigators, one of whom tells me the attorney general of Cyprus, Petros Clerides, assured them during a meeting in Nicosia, in October, just before they came face-to-face with Mr. Sevan, that if given the evidence, Cyprus "would prosecute." But since then, says this investigator, Cypriot authorities have been "uncooperative." It seems that Mr. Volcker's committee will deliver the evidence only if asked, and there is no sign yet that Cyprus is asking. Mr. Hyde's investigators say they are "going to follow up" and "will be in touch with the Cypriot ambassador." Perhaps when Mr. Annan gets done tracking down that missing Mercedes, he could lend them a hand. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs | |
No Rush to Examine Oil-For-Food Documents | |
2005-12-22 | |
UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- In a secret and secure location, a set of computers holds the hundreds of thousands of files that document how companies and individuals from some 40 countries exploited the U.N. oil-for-food program in league with Saddam Hussein. Yet nearly two months after the $35 million U.N.-backed probe that collected all those documents exposed just how troubled the program was, there has been no rush by the authorities in question to study it. Prosecutors and investigators from just 11 countries have requested documents for prosecuting bodies since the probe's final report was released Oct. 27, said Reid Morden, executive director of the inquiry led by former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker. Last week the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a Paris-based group of 30 free-market democracies, urged governments to do more to investigate evidence of kickbacks and corruption. Morden said he was not concerned at the pace so far. "It's not surprising that things are drifting in as opposed to an avalanche at day one." Some experts suspect there are governments that don't want to investigate their own complicity, or that treat bribery as the price of doing business abroad, or simply have judicial machinery that grinds slowly. Morden would not say which prosecutors have sought information, but an official close to the investigation said they were Australia, Britain, France, Germany, India, Italy, Jordan, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, and the United States. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the names of the countries have not been released. Some of the most active prosecutors are in the United States, where 15 people have been charged; France, where judges are investigating 10 officials and business leaders; and Switzerland, where a criminal probe is focusing on at least four people. Yet in others, like Russia, home to many of the companies that participated in the oil-for-food abuses, there appears to have been little movement. "I don't think it's surprising that some of these governments may be less than assiduous in following up," said James Dobbins, a former U.S. assistant secretary of state now with the Rand Corp. "It probably depends in part on the exact facts of any given case, but I don't think in most cases they're going to prosecute it with a crusading zeal." The oil-for-food program, established in 1996 with Iraq's economy crippled by sanctions, allowed Saddam to sell oil in exchange for humanitarian goods meant for his people. But Volcker's inquiry showed that Saddam sold oil to foreign countries in hopes of getting their support for lifting sanctions, and enriched himself by $1.8 billion through a kickback scheme. Companies and politicians essentially paid him for the right to do business, circumventing the U.N. program. Even the head of the program, Benon Sevan, was accused of accepting some $147,000 in kickbacks, a charge he denies. Sevan is being investigated by the Manhattan District Attorney's office but has returned to his native Cyprus, which has no extradition treaty with the United States. In November, the Volcker committee's mandate was extended to Dec. 31 in order to preserve investigators' access to the documents, and Morden said the team would ensure that they can get them well beyond that date. Fearing the report may be ignored, some U.S. lawmakers have shared information with foreign authorities and pressed them to take action. Norm Coleman, the Minnesota Republican who chairs a permanent Senate subcommittee on investigations and has been a leading critic of both the U.N. and oil-for-food, has met with several ambassadors of countries whose companies or government personnel were said to be involved. But worldwide anti-corruption surveys show that paying bribes and kickbacks are generally seen as a necessary part of dealmaking with foreign countries. Iraq was clearly one of them, said Charles Duelfer, a former U.S. weapons inspector whose own report on Iraq's weapons capabilities, released last year, also detailed much of the wrongdoing in oil-for-food. "Certainly Iraq, even before oil-for-food and sanctions, conducted business by buying influence," Duelfer said. But anti-corruption advocates say that should be no excuse for the many reputable U.S. and European companies named in Volcker's report. "It was absolutely everyone," said Juanita Olaya of Transparency International, a Berlin-based anti-corruption watchdog. "It's easy to fall into the commonplace of saying the Iraqi regime was terrible, but the whole cauldron of things there was terrible. There was of course a lot of secrecy, but how come 2,200 companies had to bear this and you never heard someone blowing the whistle out loud?" Since Volcker's report appeared, Volvo has acknowledged paying the regime, with chief executive Leif Johansson telling the Swedish news agency TT, "This was the way to do business in Iraq." Siemens of Germany has denied wrongdoing, while German authorities are investigating a former employee of DaimlerChrysler AG over the sale of a vehicle to Iraq mentioned in the inquiry. Two leading politicians have faced public scrutiny for their involvement. India's former foreign minister, Natwar Singh, was demoted after the allegations arose, and then resigned on Tuesday, still denying wrongdoing. France is investigating Jean-Bernard Merimee, its former U.N. ambassador. "In the United States I have confidence that they will investigate and prosecute wherever it's appropriate, I just hope other member governments do the same," U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said. Megawati Sukarnoputri, former president of Indonesia and ultranationalist Russian politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky were among politicians named in the report. Both have denied wrongdoing and no investigation has been announced. The government of Jordan, whose companies were prominent among alleged violators, said more than a month ago that it has begun an inquiry. But the most prominent Jordanian mentioned in the report, Fawaz Zureikat, said he hasn't been contacted yet. Zureikat, a Jordanian businessman, was accused of funneling money from the oil-for-food program to the wife of British parliamentarian George Galloway and a political organization that Galloway established in 1998 to help a 4-year-old Iraqi girl with leukemia. Galloway insists he's the innocent victim of a "witch hunt." Zureikat, who has denied any wrongdoing, offers a widely held claim that the oil-for-food investigation is a largely U.S.-led campaign to discredit the United Nations. "The United States wants the U.N. to be disqualified as a responsible organization in international affairs," he said.
| |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
U.N.: 2,000 Cos. Gave Iraq Illicit Funds |
2005-10-27 |
By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer UNITED NATIONS - More than 2,000 companies paid about $1.8 billion in illicit kickbacks and surcharges to Saddam Hussein's government through extensive manipulation of the U.N. oil-for-food program in Iraq, according to key findings of a U.N.-backed investigation obtained by The Associated Press. The report â to be released in full Thursday by the committee probing claims of wrongdoing in the $64 billion program â indicates that about half the 4,500 companies doing business with Iraq paid illegal surcharges on oil purchases or kickbacks on contracts to supply humanitarian goods. The investigators reported that companies and individuals from 66 countries paid illegal kickbacks through a variety of devices while those paying illegal oil surcharges came from, or were registered in, 40 countries. The names will be included in Thursday's report but were not in the key findings obtained Wednesday by the AP. Thursday's final report of the investigation led by former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker strongly criticizes the U.N. Secretariat and Security Council for failing to monitor the program and allowing the emergence of front companies and international trading concerns prepared to make illegal payments. According to the findings, the Banque Nationale de Paris S.A., known as BNP, which held the U.N. oil-for-food escrow account, had a dual role and did not disclose fully to the United Nations the firsthand knowledge it acquired about the financial relationships that fostered the payment of illegal surcharges. The oil-for-food program was one of the world's largest humanitarian aid operations, running from 1996-2003. Under the program, Iraq was allowed to sell limited and then unlimited quantities of oil provided most of the money went to buy humanitarian goods. It was launched to help ordinary Iraqis cope with U.N. sanctions imposed after Saddam's 1990 invasion of Kuwait and became a lifeline for 90 percent of the country's population of 26 million. But Saddam, who could choose the buyers of Iraqi oil and the sellers of humanitarian goods, corrupted the program by awarding contracts to â and getting kickbacks from â favored buyers, mostly parties who supported his regime or opposed the sanctions. He allegedly gave former government officials, journalists and U.N. officials vouchers for Iraqi oil that could then be resold at a profit. Tracing the politicization of oil contracts, the new report said Iraqi leaders in the late 1990s decided to deny American, British and Japanese companies allocations to purchase oil because of their countries' opposition to lifting sanctions on Iraq. At the same time, it said, Iraq gave preferential treatment to France, Russia and China which were perceived to be more favorable to lifting sanctions and were also permanent members of the Security Council. Volcker's previous report, released in September, said lax U.N. oversight allowed Saddam's regime to pocket $1.8 billion in kickbacks and surcharges in the awarding of contracts during the program's operation from 1997-2003. According to the new findings, Iraq's largest source of illicit income from the oil-for-food program was the more than $1.5 billion from kickbacks on humanitarian contracts. The smuggling of Iraqi oil outside the program in violation of U.N. sanctions poured much more money â $11 billion â into Saddam's coffers during the same period, according to a finding in the new report. Volcker's Independent Inquiry Committee calculated that more than 2,200 companies worldwide paid kickbacks to Iraq in the form of "fees" for transporting goods to the interior of the country or "after-sales-service" fees, or both. The report to be released Thursday chronicles Saddam's manipulation of the program and examines in detail 23 companies that paid kickbacks on humanitarian contracts including Iraqi front companies, major food providers, major trading companies, and major industrial and manufacturing companies. According to the findings, the program was just under three years old when the Iraqi regime began openly demanding illicit payments from its customers. The report said that while U.N. officials and the Security Council were informed, little action was taken. The report is the fifth by Volcker and wraps up a year-long, $34 million investigation that has faulted Secretary-General Kofi Annan, his deputy, Canada's Louise Frechette, and the Security Council for tolerating corruption and doing little to stop Saddam's manipulations. The investigation also accused Benon Sevan, the former head of the U.N. oil-for-food program, of taking $147,000 in illegal kickbacks. |
Link |
Home Front: Economy |
Reconstruction Redux |
2005-09-19 |
![]() New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin -- he who sent people to the Superdome and Convention Center without provisioning them with food, water and security -- is at it again. Nagin is inviting French Quarter businesses to reopen, and residents of the chic Garden District and the less-than-chic Algiers neighborhood (about 180,000 people all told) to return. The city to which they may return is without a water supply that's fit for anything other than putting out fires or flushing toilets. It is without levees that can withstand another storm, even one much weaker than Katrina. It is without emergency telephone service and an evacuation plan that could work if the levees fail again. Nagin is having a panic attack. He's looking at a city from which his voting base has decamped to higher ground. He has to get those voters back, even if it means some will die from floods, cholera, or amoebic dysentery. Coast Guard VAdm. Thad Allen, who took over as senior FEMA man on site when hapless Michael Brown was sent packing, is not happy with Nagin. Allen -- scheduled to meet with Nagin today -- said that he planned to bring his concerns to the mayor's attention, which is all he can do. Louisiana continues to suffer from the constitutional right of self-determination, by which it has chosen to be governed by a collection of clowns unequalled outside the U.N. General Assembly. We mustn't tinker with the Constitution. But that doesn't mean we should leave the Louisiana banana republicans in charge of spending all that dough. At the time proceedings were delayed by Katrina, several senior officials of the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness were awaiting trial on federal indictments regarding missing funds and improper expenditures. FEMA had demanded the return of $30 million given LOHSEP whilst federal bean counters continue to search for another $60 million which no one at LOHSEP can seem to find. (One FEMA report said the LOHSEP couldn't account for more than 90% of $15 million in FEMA funds it had awarded to Louisiana contractors.) Are we crazy enough to trust this crew with billions of federal construction dollars? ![]() First, the president has to create a system of offsets to begin restoring some sanity to the federal budget. For every dollar or two we spend on the South, another dollar should be cut elsewhere. The wonderful people of Bozeman, Montana, asked their congressman to give back the couple of millions they were to receive but didn't need under the recently passed highway bill porkfest. Every American should do the same. That won't pay for the reconstruction, but it will get us off on the right foot. When House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said there was no more fat to cut from the federal budget, he proved that Republicans are as drunk on federal budget booze as the Dems ever were. (Dear Mr. DeLay: You gotta be kidding me, fella. Haven't you heard of NPR, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the United Nations? Call me, and I'll give you a long list of federal and globaloney pestilences that could be cut to save many billions.) Second, if we're going to pay for this, let's make sure we don't have to pay for it again in 20 or 50 years when the next Category 4 or 5 storm blows in. After the 1900 hurricane that destroyed the island city of Galveston, practical Texans decided to raise the level of ground above sea level before rebuilding. They piped in millions of tons of dredge spoil -- the stuff you drag up from the bottom of the river -- to raise the city above sea level. If Texas could do that a century ago, is it too much to expect from New Orleans today? Bulldoze the destroyed areas of the "soup bowl" in which New Orleans sits, pile a few billion cubic yards of dredge spoil on top, and then rebuild. It's one of those twofers that the laws of physics grant. If the dredging is done in the right places, it'll help strengthen the levee system by reducing the pressure on it. Third, put someone in charge we can trust. That's obviously not LOHSEP, at least as it stands. Part of the price of federal aid should be a requirement that LOHSEP be re-staffed at the top two or three levels with people who haven't spent their careers in Louisiana government and who have proven expertise in administering huge construction contracts. If Gov. Blanco resists, FEMA should simply cut LOHSEP out of the loop and do the contracting itself. And no, we can't yet have that much confidence in FEMA. The FEMA side should be put in the hands of someone with expertise and experience in huge construction projects, and that person should be supported by some of the hundreds of certified procurement contract managers in industry and government who could be drafted to work for FEMA and run this right. Last, and not at all least, the feds should impose time and performance limits on every contractor. Gov. Pete Wilson got a lot of California earthquake-damaged highways rebuilt years before anyone thought they could be. He did it by imposing a system of financial big rewards and harsh penalties that made sure contractors got things done in the minimum amount of time without sacrificing the quality of the work. There are a lot of contractors based in other states (such as -- brace yourself -- Halliburton) that can do massive jobs such as this very well. Let 'em all bid against each other and drive the costs down. The object of the reconstruction is not to rebuild what was destroyed on a new foundation of old defects. The object must be to help our fellow Americans rebuild their lives in a way that makes them less vulnerable to a repeat of the catastrophe they've suffered. We're going to have to do this more than once. The next natural disaster or terrorist attack may take out another American city that will have to be rebuilt. In rebuilding New Orleans we can learn how not to build one disaster on the ruins of another. Let's get it right the first time. |
Link |