Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Jordan cleric Abu Qatada to stand trial from Dec 10
2013-12-04
[Pak Daily Times] Salafist holy man Abu Qatada, deported by Britannia in July after a near decade-long legal battle, is to go on trial in Jordan on December 10, judicial sources said on Tuesday.

"The state security court has set next Tuesday, December 10, as the date for the first hearing in the trial of Abu Qatada," one source said.

Defence lawyer Taysir Diab said he would meet his client on Saturday ahead of the trial opening.

After his deportation in July, Jordanian military prosecutors charged Abu Qatada with conspiracy to carry out terrorist acts. If convicted he could face a minimum of 15 years' hard labour, a judicial source told AFP last month. "The hearing, set for midday (0900 GMT), should be public and open to the media," Diab said.

Britannia's expulsion of Abu Qatada came after Amman and London ratified a treaty guaranteeing that evidence obtained by torture would not be used in his retrial and that the proceedings would be transparent.

The Paleostinian-born preacher was condemned to death in his absence in 1999 for conspiracy to carry out terror attacks, including on the American school in Amman, but this was immediately commuted to life imprisonment with hard labour.

In 2000, he was also sentenced in absentia to 15 years for plotting to attack tourists in Jordan during millennium celebrations.

However,
a woman is only as old as she admits...
he is to stand trial again for the charges, as Jordanian law gives him the right to a retrial with him present in the dock.

Born Omar Mahmud Mohammed Otman in Bethlehem in the now Israeli-occupied West Bank, Abu Qatada has Jordanian nationality because the town was part of Jordan at the time of his birth.

Videotapes of his sermons were allegedly found in the Hamburg flat of 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta.

Top Spanish judge Baltasar Garzon once branded Abu Qatada the late Osama bin Laden
... who is now sometimes referred to as Mister Bones...
's right-hand man in Europe, although he denies ever having met the late al Qaeda leader.
Link


Europe
Our Boy Baltazar To Lead Assange's Legal Team
2012-07-24
Ay-Pee. What? Ramsey Clark was unavailable?
Wikileaks says it has hired Spanish judge Baltasar Garzon to lead the legal team representing the group and its founder, Julian Assange.

Garzon won global fame for aggressively taking on international human rights cases. He is best known for indicting former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1998.
But he's got 11 years of free time
Wikileaks said Tuesday that Garzon recently met with the Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where the group's founder is holed up seeking asylum, to discuss a "new legal strategy."
"We are innocent under the Federation of Planets Rules"
Assange is currently fighting extradition to Sweden, where he is wanted for questioning about allegations of sexual misconduct.
he reeaaaaallly doesn't want to go back. Perhaps Roman Polanski could make a film about him?
Wikileaks said in a statement posted on its Twitter account that Garzon has expressed "serious concerns" about "the lack of safeguards and transparency" with which actions are being taken against Assange.
"Plus he damaged the West. I consider that a plus!"
Link


Europe
Thousands rally to support disbarred Spanish judge
2012-02-13
MADRID: Thousands of people rallied Sunday in Spain’s capital in support of the disbarred judge famous for taking on international human rights cases. Baltasar Garzon, 56, was convicted Feb. 9 by the Supreme Court, marking a spectacular fall from grace for the nation’s most prominent jurist. The seven-judge panel disbarred him for 11 years, effectively ending Garzon’s career unless he can have their decision reversed on appeal.

A large square outside the main gates of the Supreme Court filled with around 10,000 people, many carrying placards and banners calling for justice for the former judge and chanting, “Garzon, friend, Spain is with you.”

In Thursday’s verdict, the court ruled that Garzon acted unlawfully in ordering jailhouse wiretaps of detainees talking to their lawyers, the court said, adding that his actions “these days are only found in totalitarian regimes.”

The case was just one of three against Garzon, who is still awaiting a verdict in another trial on charges of initiating a probe in 2008 of rightist atrocities committed during and after the Spanish civil war of 1936-1939, even though the crimes were covered by a 1977 amnesty.

Garzon is best known internationally for indicting former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1998, and trying to put him on trial in Madrid for crimes against humanity. He also indicted Osama Bin Laden in 2003 over the Sept. 11 attacks and oversaw many rulings against Basque separatist group ETA and its political wing, Batasuna.

As a judge at Spain’s National Court, Garzon took on cases using the principle of universal jurisdiction — the idea that some crimes are so heinous they can be prosecuted anywhere. He attempted to apply this legal doctrine to abuses committed in far-flung places like Rwanda and Tibet.
Strangely, he never prosecuted the King Leopold over the Congo...
Garzon was a hero to many left-leaning human rights activists, but was viewed with suspicion by conservative sectors of Spanish society, including many senior judges who saw him as attention seeking and egotistical.

Garzon faces more legal woes over ties with a big Spanish bank that financed human rights seminars he oversaw while on sabbatical in New York in 2005 and 2006.
Link


Europe
Crusading Spanish judge ousted for using wiretaps
2012-02-10
Judge Baltasar Garzon, renowned for indicting late Chilean dictator Pinochet, may be facing the end of his career on the bench after Thursday’s ruling by the Spanish Supreme Court barring him from the judiciary for 11 years.

Garzon violated the constitutional rights of defendants in a corruption case when he ordered their communications monitored during pre-trial detention, the Spanish Supreme Court said in a unanimous ruling. By recording the jailed defendants’ telephone calls, Garzon hampered their right to a defense "without any reason that could be minimally acceptable," concluded the high court.

Garzon argued during the trial that it was necessary to monitor the defendants’ communication to ensure they did not continue to operate their purported criminal enterprise while imprisoned.

Suspended in 2010, Garzon will now be stripped of his judgeship on Spain’s National Court, established to deal with terrorism as well as major drug and corruption cases.

The magistrate who indicted Pinochet and successfully prosecuted Al Qaeda and ETA terrorists still awaits a verdict in a case brought against him for allegedly violating a 1977 amnesty law by initiating investigations of the crimes of the Franco regime. Another trial, in which Garzon is charged with accepting improper payments for speeches, is ongoing.
Link


Europe
Socialist-Internationalist Spanish judge suspended ahead of trial
2010-05-15
Spain's crusading judge Baltasar Garzon was suspended from his post Friday ahead of his trial for abuse of power linked to a probe of Franco-era crimes, a decision condemned by human rights groups.

The body that oversees the judiciary, the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), decided unanimously to suspend Garzon, a spokeswoman for the body said, two days after the Supreme Court cleared the way for his trial.

On hearing of the decision, an emotional Garzon emerged from his office at National Court to cheers and hugs from dozens of supporters who chanted "Garzon, friend, the people are with you!"

Garzon is accused of abuse of power for opening an investigation in 2008 into the disappearance of tens of thousands of people during the 1936-39 civil war and General Francisco Franco's ensuing right-wing dictatorship. The case follows a complaint by far-right groups that the probe ignored an amnesty law passed in 1977, two years after Franco's death, for crimes committed under the general's rule.

Garzon has argued that the disappearances constituted crimes against humanity and were therefore not covered by the amnesty.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday removed the last obstacle to his trial over the case, although no date been set.

If convicted he would avoid prison but could be suspended for up to 20 years, which would effectively end the career of the 54-year-old.

"It's a very sad day for Spain," said Santiago Macias, the vice president of the Association for the Recovery of Historical Memory, which campaigns for the rights of victims of Franco.

"Today, someone needs to come out and say: 'Spaniards, justice is dead,'" he said, referring to the famous line of a television presenter in 1975 who announced in tears that "Spaniards, Franco is dead."

Human Rights Watch also condemned the CGPJ's decision.

"This is a sad day for the cause of human rights. Garzon was instrumental in delivering justice for victims of atrocities abroad and now he is being punished for trying to do the same at home," Reed Brody, the rights group's legal counsel, said in a statement.

"Garzon's decision not to apply Spain's amnesty, for which he is being prosecuted, is supported by international law, which impose on states a duty to investigate the worst international crimes, including crimes against humanity."

On Tuesday, Garzon asked Spanish authorities to be allowed to work as a consultant for the International Criminal Court, following an offer from The Hague-based court.

The ICC posting, scheduled to last seven months, had been seen as an attempt by him to avoid the humiliation of a formal suspension over the charges against him.

The judge is also involved in two other cases, one regarding wiretaps he ordered as part of a probe into a corruption scandal involving members of the conservative opposition party and another over suspected bribery over payments he allegedly received for seminars in New York.

He first made world headlines in October 1998 when he ordered the arrest of former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet in London under the principle of "universal jurisdiction."


Universal jurisdiction holds that heinous crimes like torture or terrorism can be tried in Spain even if they had no link to the country.
In March 2009, Garzón considered whether Spain should allow charges to be filed against former officials from the United States government under George W. Bush for offering justifications for torture.

The six former Bush officials are: Alberto Gonzales, former Attorney General; John Yoo, of the Office of Legal Counsel; Douglas Feith, former undersecretary of defense for policy; William Haynes II, former general counsel for the Department of Defense; Jay Bybee, also at Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel; and David Addington, Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff.

On 29 April 2009, Garzon opened an investigation into an alleged "systematic programme" of torture at Guantanamo Bay, following accusations by four former prisoners. Garzón has repeatedly expressed a desire to investigate former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in connection with a plot in the 1970s known as Operation Condor.
Link


Europe
Spanish judge starts Guantanamo torture probe
2009-04-30
[Al Arabiya Latest] A Spanish judge started a criminal investigation on Wednesday into alleged torture of detainees in the U.S. base at Guantanamo.

Judge Baltasar Garzon, who once tried to extradite former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, will probe the "perpetrators, the instigators, the necessary collaborators and accomplices" to crimes of torture at the prison at the U.S. naval base in southern Cuba, he said in ruling

The judge based his decision on statements by Hamed Abderrahman Ahmed, known as the "Spanish Taliban" and three other former Guantanamo detainees -- a Moroccan, a Palestinian and a Libyan -- who alleged they had suffered torture at the camp.

"It seems that the documents declassified by the U.S. administration mentioned by the media have revealed what was previously a suspicion -- the existence of an authorized and systematic program of torture" at Guantanamo and other prisons including that in Bagram in Afghanistan, Garzon said
Link


Europe
Gaarzon rules out dropping Gitmo probe
2009-04-19
[Al Arabiya Latest] A Spanish judge considering possible criminal action against six former Bush administration officials for torture at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay defied pressure to drop the case on Friday.

However Judge Baltasar Garzon, internationally known for trying to extradite former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, accepted that he might not personally take charge of any eventual criminal investigation into officials including former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Public prosecutors at the National Audience, Spain's top criminal court earlier issued an official request to Garzon to drop the investigation. They said Garzon was unqualified to carry out such a "general inquiry into policies put in place by the previous U.S. administration."
Link


International-UN-NGOs
Spain has no right to try U.S. officials
2009-04-03
By Douglas Feith

A lawyer in Spain -- who did his legal studies while serving over seven years in prison for kidnapping and terrorism -- has engineered a complaint accusing the U.S. government of systematically torturing war-on-terrorism detainees. He filed this complaint with Baltasar Garzon, an activist magistrate famous for championing the "universal jurisdiction" of Spanish courts. That magistrate is now asking a Spanish prosecutor to bring criminal charges on this matter against former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, four other former Bush administration lawyers, and me.

The allegation is not that any of us tortured anyone. And it is not that any of us even directed anyone to commit torture. The allegation is that, when we advised President George W. Bush on the Geneva Conventions and detainee interrogations, our interpretations were wrong -- in the view of the disapproving Spaniards. According to the complaint, these wrong interpretations encouraged the president to make decisions that led to torture. The Spanish magistrate apparently believes that it can be a crime for American officials to offer the wrong kind of advice to a president of the United States and, furthermore, it can be a crime punishable by a Spanish court. This is a national insult with harmful implications.

The general sloppiness of the complaint's factual assertions is clear from its discussion of my work. The entire case against me hinges on my alleged role in arguing that the detainees in Guantanamo Bay should not receive protection under Geneva Article 3 relating to humane treatment. I never made any such argument. On the contrary, the most significant role I played in the debates about Geneva was in early 2002 when I -- together with Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff Gen. Richard Myers -- helped persuade Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to take a strongly pro-Geneva position in the first National Security Council meeting on the subject on Feb. 4.

Noting in writing that Geneva is part of U.S. law, I argued it is a good treaty and it is "important that the President appreciate DOD's interest in the Convention." I wrote that "U.S. armed forces are trained to treat captured enemy forces according to the Convention," that Geneva is "morally important, crucial to U.S. morale," and that it is also "practically important, for it makes U.S. forces the gold standard in the world, facilitating our winning cooperation from other countries." In conclusion, I urged "[h]umane treatment for all detainees" and recommended that the president explain that Geneva "does not squarely address circumstances that we are confronting in this new global war against terrorism, but while we work through the legal questions, we are upholding the principle of universal applicability of the Convention." I briefed these arguments directly to the president at that Feb. 4 NSC meeting, and his decision on Geneva's applicability to the war against the Taliban was consistent with them.

The allegation that I argued against Article 3 protection was invented by a British lawyer named Philippe Sands and published in an angry, wildly inaccurate book called "Torture Team." Mr. Sands asserts that, in our interview, I admitted making the case against Article 3. He was eventually compelled to publish the interview transcript, however, and it shows that nothing I said supports his allegation, that he grossly misquoted me on a number of points, and that he never asked me a single question about Article 3. Mr. Sands has to this day never accounted for how he could charge me with opposing Article 3 based on an interview in which the term "Article 3" was never even mentioned by me or him. I dissected Mr. Sands's misrepresentations in detail in testimony I gave to the House Judiciary Committee last summer.

As bad as the Spanish complaint is for relying expressly on Mr. Sands's discredited book for facts, it is far worse for the principle it is trying to establish -- that a foreign court should punish former U.S. officials criminally if the judge thinks their official advice to the U.S. president violated international law. Whatever advice any of us offered the president on these debatable issues, it would be an unprecedented outrage to make our participation in government policy making a subject for second-guessing in a foreign criminal court.

From the Nuremburg trials of the Nazi leadership forward, none of the cases in which former government officials have been tried for international crimes are actually precedents for what the Spanish officials are now considering. In countries run by officials who rule by force, commit aggression, perpetrate humanitarian outrages and stand above and out of reach of any domestic law, leaders are sometimes tried by international tribunals. Such countries' sovereignty is not respected because their own domestic laws -- let alone their international legal obligations -- do not bind their leaders. But ours is a country of laws, and no reasonable person doubts that the American legal system has integrity. If President Barack Obama and the prosecutors see a crime to be prosecuted, they can act. It would be hostile for a foreign official to decide that U.S. sovereignty on this matter should not be respected because the U.S. is like Nazi Germany or Serbia under Slobodan Milosevic.

What if a Spanish magistrate doesn't like the legal analyses prepared by U.S. officials on other subjects, such as nuclear weapons, or the death penalty, or atmospheric pollution, or border security with Mexico? Any of these matters could be the basis for a claim by a creative European jurist that a U.S. official is taking a position contrary to international law as interpreted by right-thinking Europeans. It seems clear that the goal of this judicial exercise is to carry a political disagreement into criminal courts and thereby to intimidate U.S. officials. If Spanish officials decide to carry the prosecution forward, then Americans who know that their views run contrary to those of various Spanish or other European activists would have to think twice about voicing those views -- or stay out of U.S. government service altogether -- if they want to avoid being threatened with arrest in Europe.

The American people can tolerate this only if they are willing to forfeit the right to make their own laws and policies. This is not a left-versus-right political issue. It is a question of preserving the American constitutional system of government in which U.S. officials are answerable for their opinions and advice to the American people -- but not to foreign criminal courts.
Link


Europe
In which Judge Baltasar Garzon breaks my heart
2009-03-29
Yeah, I know. I wuz warned.
A Spanish court has agreed to consider opening a criminal case against six former Bush administration officials, including former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, over allegations they gave legal cover for torture at Guantanamo Bay, a lawyer in the case said Saturday.

Human rights lawyers brought the case before leading anti-terror judge Baltasar Garzon, who agreed to send it on to prosecutors to decide whether it had merit, Gonzalo Boye, one of the lawyers who brought the charges, told The Associated Press.

The ex-Bush officials are Gonzales; former undersecretary of defense for policy Douglas Feith; former Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff David Addington; Justice Department officials John Yoo and Jay S. Bybee; and Pentagon lawyer William Haynes.

Yoo declined to comment. A request for comment left with Feith through his Hudson Institute e-mail address was not immediately returned.

Spanish law allows courts to reach beyond national borders in cases of torture or war crimes under a doctrine of universal justice, though the government has recently said it hopes to limit the scope of the legal process.

Garzon became famous for bringing charges against former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1998, and he and other Spanish judges have agreed to investigate alleged abuses everywhere from Tibet to Argentina's "dirty war," El Salvador and Rwanda.

Still, the country's record in prosecuting such cases has been spotty at best, with only one suspect extradited to Spain so far.

When a similar case was brought against Israeli officials earlier this year, Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos assured his Israeli counterpart that the process would be quashed.

Even if indictments are eventually handed down against the U.S. officials, it is far from clear whether arrests would ever take place. The officials would have to travel outside the United States and to a country willing to take them into custody before possible extradition to Spain.
Kinda like extraordinary rendition, without the Chloroform.
Boye said he expected the National Court to take the case forward, and dismissed concerns that it would harm bilateral relations between the two countries. He said that some of the victims of the alleged torture were Spaniards, strengthening the argument for Spanish jurisdiction. "When you bring a case like this you can't stop to make political judgments as to how it might affect bilateral relations between countries," he told the AP." It's too important for that."

Boye noted that the case was brought not against interrogators who might have committed crimes but by the lawyers and other high-placed officials who gave cover for their actions. "Our case is a denunciation of lawyers, by lawyers, because we don't believe our profession should be used to help commit such barbarities," he said.

Another lawyer with detailed knowledge of the case told the AP that Garzon's decision to consider the charges was "a significant first step." The lawyer spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media.

There was no immediate comment from Garzon or the government.

The judge's decision to send the case against the American officials to prosecutors means it will proceed, at least for now. Prosecutors must now decide whether to recommend a full-blown investigation, though Garzon is not bound by their decision.

The proceedings against the Bush Administration officials could be embarrassing for Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, who has been keen to improve ties with the United States after frosty relations during the Bush Administration Zapatero is scheduled to meet President Barack Obama for the first time on April 5 during a summit in Prague.
Time to go to the barricades, like Bashir's constituents. Anyone want to chant some "anti-Spanish court" slogans with me?
Link


Europe
Spain: Eighteen arrests during nationwide anti-terror raids
2008-10-17
(AKI) - Spanish police have arrested at least 18 terror suspects of Moroccan origin with alleged links to Al-Qaeda in the provinces of Catalonia, Andalucia and Madrid on Thursday, reported Spanish media.

The suspects helped some of the suspects in the deadly bombings of Madrid commuters in March 2004 to escape and were allegedly in charge of recruiting militants and financing Islamist activities, prosecutors allege.

The raids were carried out in the northeastern town of Santa Coloma de Gramanet where eight suspects were nabbed. The other arrests took place in the towns of Badalona near Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Valles and Villanova i la Geltru among others. The raids were ordered by top Spanish prosecutor Baltasar Garzon.

The Madrid bombings on 11 March 2004 were Europe's worst terror attack since the 1988 Lockerbie bombing in Scotland. A total of 191 people were killed and 2,000 were injured when 10 rucksack bombs exploded in four crowded commuter trains.

Twenty-one people, including a number of North Africans, were sentenced to over 40,000 years in jail for their roles in the attack. It was carried out by a loosely knit group of Al-Qaeda-inspired Muslim militants and occurred three days before the country's general election.
Link


Europe
Three small bomb explosions rock Spain
2008-05-02
Three small bombs exploded early on Thursday in Spain’s Basque city of San Sebastian and a nearby town after a warning call claiming to be from Basque separatist rebels ETA, said Spanish local officials. The caller warned of the two bombs in San Sebastian but not of another device which exploded shortly afterwards in the town of Arrigorriaga, Guipuzcoa province. There were no injuries.

Two bombs went off outside a Basque Justice and Employment Department building in San Sebastian and another blast took place near a Labour Ministry building in Arrigorriaga, coinciding with Workers’ Day, which is a national holiday in Spain.

“The damage looks quite spectacular, there were some vehicles inside the building complex and the door has been blown off,” Arrigorriaga’s Mayor, Alberto Ruiz, told state radio. “But I don’t think the damage is worth a lot,” he added. The events also came one day after Judge Baltasar Garzon denied Basque MayoressInocencia Galparsoro bail and sent her to prison, pending trial, for supporting the aims of ETA.
Link


Europe
Zapatero's Anti-Terror Push Boosts Campaign
2008-02-18
It's easier for Zappie to go after the ETA than the Islamicists, though the latter is the mortal threat to Spain. Then again, Zappie's a socialist, so he has sympathies for the Islamicists.

But pay attention: if we end up with President Barack Obama, he too will see the value of going after terrorists starting in, oh, late 2011 ...
Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Pablo Gorostiaga was cleaning out his cowshed near Orozco, in northern Spain, when 25 masked police officers with sub-machine guns and black body armor burst into the farmyard and dragged him off, cuffed and hooded. He was charged with collaborating with the Basque terror group ETA.

The December arrest of Gorostiaga, 66, a former mayor, is part of a crackdown on separatists that is fueling tensions in Spain's Basque region. It's also helping Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero maintain a lead in opinion polls over People's Party leader Mariano Rajoy before general elections March 9. ``This is the politics of revenge,'' said Gorostiaga's son Xabier, 40. ``They just do it to show they are in charge.'' Gorostiaga was already being prosecuted; the arrest after 18 months of trial was to ensure he wouldn't flee, police said.

No country on Europe's continent has suffered more terrorism violence, homegrown and international, than Spain. Zapatero came to power in 2004 after Islamic militants killed 191 in an attack on Madrid trains that tipped the vote against the ruling People's Party. In 2006, he tried to negotiate an end to 40 years of Basque violence that has cost more than 800 lives.

Those talks, which Rajoy told Zapatero consisted of ``so many errors they are burying you,'' ended when ETA bombed Madrid's Barajas airport in December 2006, killing two. Since then, Zapatero has switched from peacemaker to crusader, ramping up police pressure on the separatists.

Spanish police have arrested 98 suspected ETA operatives since the Barajas bombing, as well as at least 34 people accused of links to terrorists. Ten days after his arrest, Gorostiaga was sentenced to nine years in prison. ``Zapatero needed to show that he was tough,'' said Javier Elzo, professor of sociology at Deusto University in Bilbao. ``The PP always used terrorism as part of its bid to win elections and when Zapatero's attempt at negotiations failed, he did the same.''

The month following ETA's attack on the Madrid airport was the last time Zapatero, 47, trailed Rajoy, 52, in opinion polls. The prime minister now trails Rajoy by less than 2 percentage points on anti-terror policy while leading on almost every other issue. Zapatero led the People's Party by 5.5 percentage points, compared with 6.4 points a week earlier, according to an opinion poll of 4,008 Spaniards published on Feb. 11 in Publico newspaper.

Zapatero's terrorism initiative has also been aided by Spain's independent judiciary. National Court Magistrate Baltasar Garzon>Baltasar Garzon last week suspended two separatist parties over alleged links to ETA, provoking a Feb. 10 protest in Bilbao in which police clashed with demonstrators. ``There is much more pressure on us since the cease-fire ended,'' said Arantza Urkaregi, a spokeswoman for suspended party Basque Nationalist Action.

ETA has been using violence for more than 40 years in a bid to create a Basque region independent from France and Spain. The effort has left thousands of relatives of victims and survivors of their attacks in its wake. The country's largest such group, the Association of Terrorism Victims, has become a political force, organizing large-scale protests to oppose Zapatero's talks with ETA. About 1,000 politicians, business executives and journalists live with bodyguards, according to the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee.

``Business people, judges, politicians and some journalists have to live with this danger day in, day out,'' said Antonio Basagoiti, head of the PP in Bilbao, who has had bodyguards for 10 years. ``The tension has increased; we all realize that one day we might be dealt a bad hand.''

The end of the truce and signs that Islamic militants may also be planning new violence are stoking concerns about an electoral attack. In January, Spanish authorities arrested 14 people in Barcelona whom they said were linked to an Islamic terror cell planning an attack on the city. It was a group inspired by al-Qaeda that carried out the Madrid train bombing three days ahead of the 2004 election to punish the PP government for backing the U.S.-led war in Iraq, prosecutors in the case said. Zapatero had trailed Rajoy in polls before the attack.

``Al-Qaeda has already boasted of its ability to intervene in Spanish political life,'' while ``ETA will try for a spectacular attack with the elections approaching,'' said Fernando Reinares, head of research in international terrorism at the Elcano Institute in Madrid.
They won't do it this time: Zappie is their man, and al-Qaeda doesn't want the PP back in power.
A survey of 2,472 people by the Center for Sociological Research in December showed that 19.5 percent of respondents said terrorism was their biggest concern, compared with 11.8 percent in November. ``The government has the advantage at the moment, and if it doesn't make any mistakes, it's enough for them to win,'' said Francisco Llera, professor of political science at the University of the Basque Country in Leioa.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More