Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg
Abdul Rasul Sayyaf Abdul Rasul Sayyaf Ittehad-i-Islami India-Pakistan 20060323 Link
  Abdul Rasul Sayyaf Ikhwan-e-Muslimeen Afghanistan 20020919  

Afghanistan
Islamic Emirate Reacts to Newly-Formed 'Resistance Council'
2021-10-24
[ToloNews] A number of officials of the former government along with mujahideen leaders recently announced the formation of a new political movement called the "High Council of National Resistance® of the Islamic Theocratic Republic of Afghanistan," which sparked reactions from the Islamic Emirate.

Abdulrab Rasul Sayyaf
...old Northern Alliance warlord with many versions of his name in the archives and elsewhere...
a Jihadi leader, and Atta Mohammad Noor, leader of the splinter faction of Jamaat-e-Islami
...The Islamic Society, founded in 1941 in Lahore by Maulana Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi, aka The Great Apostosizer. The Jamaat opposed the independence of Bangladesh but has operated an independent branch there since 1975. It maintains close ties with international Mohammedan groups such as the Moslem Brotherhood. the Taliban, and al-Qaeda. The Jamaat's objectives are the establishment of a pure Islamic state, governed by Sharia law. It is distinguished by its xenophobia, and its opposition to Westernization, capitalism, socialism, secularism, and liberalist social mores...
, announced on Facebook the formation of a new political movement, saying it consists of a number of political mainstream groups in the country.

The new movement in a statement insisted on reaching an agreement with the Islamic Emirate via dialogue, but it warned that if the Islamic Emirate does not talk with them, they will take up weapons.

Islamic Emirate front man Zabihullah Mujahid, reacting to the new movement, said no one can threaten the people of Afghanistan in the name of resistance or anything else.

"No longer is there a need for making fronts. Anyone who establishes a front will not gain good results," he said.

"It would be better for the Islamic Emirate to pave the way for all its political opponents to come inside the country and share their views," said Sayed Ishaq Gailani, leader of the National Solidarity Movement of Afghanistan.

The new council was formed under the leadership of Sayyaf, although it is not known in which countries the members of the council are living.
Related:
Atta Mohammad Noor: 2021-08-30 Noor, Dostum to form new front for negotiating with Taliban
Atta Mohammad Noor: 2021-08-16 Afghan Warlords Give Up to the Taliban with Surprising Ease
Atta Mohammad Noor: 2021-08-10 Taliban capture sixth Afghan provincial capital, Aibak
Related:
Abdul Rasul Sayyaf: 2015-09-11 Rassoul Sayyaf's Remarks on Taliban Widely Hailed
Abdul Rasul Sayyaf: 2012-04-16 Salahuddin Rabbani Replaces Father as Head of High Peace Council
Abdul Rasul Sayyaf: 2010-09-05 Karzai announces peace talks with Taliban
Related:
Rassoul Sayyaf: 2021-09-02 The Taliban leader who trained with the Indian Army
Rassoul Sayyaf: 2021-07-13 Turkmenistan deploying troops, heavy weapon on border with Afghanistan
Rassoul Sayyaf: 2020-08-25 Pakistan Invites Taliban, China to Discuss Afghanistan Peace
Related:
Sayed Ishaq Gailani: 2021-10-04 Cultural Ministry Says No Chinese Troops at Bagram
Sayed Ishaq Gailani: 2021-09-28 Taliban: Some Restrictions in Provinces Not Official
Sayed Ishaq Gailani: 2021-09-12 Human Cost of 'War on Terror' in Afghanistan
Link


Afghanistan
Rassoul Sayyaf's Remarks on Taliban Widely Hailed
2015-09-11
[Tolo News] In a recent statement, former Jihadi leader Abdul Rasul Sayyaf strongly criticized the Taliban for carrying out attacks against civilians, and called the group's activities totally un-Islamic and against Afghan values.

"I want them [the Taliban] to free themselves of others' slavery. If they have any objections they should come and share them with us. They should not take commands from others," he added.

"The Taliban movement is neither an Islamic movement nor an Afghan cause. As a religious student I want to announce that they {Taliban} aren't dying as deaders," Sayyaf added.

Sayyaf's remarks on Pakistain and Taliban were widely hailed amongst various Afghan social segments as many inside the country believe that Islamabad is harboring the infamous Taliban group in a bid to destabilize Afghanistan and pursue its own strategic objectives.

On Thursday, some Afghan politicians in parliament and religious scholars come out in strong support of Sayyaf and urged that the remarks were based on reality.

"Sayyaf's statements illustrate the realities of the country, Taliban's deeds are neither Islamic, nor based on Sharia," Nejrabi said.

As rumors continue on Pakistain's so-called not so honest cooperation in the war against terrorism, public opinion in Afghanistan seems that the majority of Afghans want government to adopt a clear policy toward the neighboring country.

The National Unity Government (NUG) needs to come with a clear stance toward Pakistain, chairman of parliament's internal security commission, Mirdad Khan Nejrabi said.

Announcing support to Sayyaf's statement, a number of Afghan citizens have also slammed the Taliban for their atrocities and called them slaves of Pakistain that serve the policies of Pakistain.

According to members of the public, those who deliberately kill the people cannot be called Moslems, referring to the attacks by Taliban.

"Sayyaf's assertions are based on reality, he illustrated these things from the Koran and Hadees," religious scholar Waliullah Labib said. "Government in Afghanistan should deal with Pakistain as an enemy and talk with Pakistain from the point of enemy."

In addition, the religious scholars have called on the warring factions to stop killing each other as the people of Afghanistan are the main victims of violence and cannot tolerate more bloodshed.

"Stop killing the innocent people and halt the war, get instruction from Koran and Hadith," head of the Sharia faculty of Kabul
...the capital of Afghanistan. Home to continuous fighting from 1992 to 1996 between the forces of would-be strongman and Pak ISI/Jamaat-e-Islami sock puppet Gulbuddin Hekmayar and the Northern Alliance, a period which won Hek the title Most Evil Man in the World and didn't do much for the reputations of the Northern Alliance guys either....
University Shaheedi said.

"How can they be deaders, even Allah has cursed Taliban," a Kabul resident Mohammad Nasim said.

"Those who are killing the innocent people and the children are not deaders, but deviants," another resident Sayed Nadir Amiri said.

"Those committing suicide kabooms and killing innocents aren't deaders, they are deviants, they even kill the people in the mosques," another resident Hafizullah said.

Sayyaf remains as one of the major critics of Taliban and his anti-Taliban outbursts have been welcomed largely.
Link


Afghanistan
Salahuddin Rabbani Replaces Father as Head of High Peace Council
2012-04-16
[Tolo News] Salahuddin Rabban is the new head of Afghanistan's High Peace Council, replacing his father Burhanuddin Rabbani
... the gentlemanly murdered legitimate president of Afghanistan...
who was head of the council when he was assassinated by the Taliban last year.

The appointment was confirmed by Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
... A former Baltimore restaurateur, now 12th and current President of Afghanistan, displacing the legitimate president Rabbani in December 2004. He was installed as the dominant political figure after the removal of the Taliban regime in late 2001 in a vain attempt to put a Pashtun face on the successor state to the Taliban. After the 2004 presidential election, he was declared president regardless of what the actual vote count was. He won a second, even more dubious, five-year-term after the 2009 presidential election. His grip on reality has been slipping steadily since around 2007, probably from heavy drug use...
on Saturday.

Salahuddin was Afghanistan's Ambassador to Turkey before he was appointed as acting chairman of Islamist political party Jamaat-e-Islami
...which is different from the Pak and Bangla Jamaats...
, the party his father led from 1968 to his death in 2011.

President Karzai, the first vice president Marshal Fahim, Governor of Balkh Atta Mohammed Noor, and member of Parliament Abdul Rasul Sayyaf made the new appointment, according to a statement from Karzai's press office.

Salahuddin is quoted in the statement as saying that Afghanistan would only reach stability through peace, and that for any peace to be brokered it must be an Afghan-led process or it will not have the trust of Afghans.

Salahuddin's father, Burhanuddin Rabbani, was assassinated on September 20 last year by a so-called Taliban messenger at his Kabul home in Wazir Akbar Khan.

The suicide kaboomer placed bombs in his turban and went kaboom!" while greeting Burhanuddin.

Burhanuddin was president of Afghanistan from 1992 to 1996, and then became a member of parliament.

He was appointed head of the High Peace Council in October 2010 when it was first formed by Karzai in an effort to find a political solution for the decade long war in the country.
Link


Afghanistan
Karzai announces peace talks with Taliban
2010-09-05
[Al Arabiya] Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai Saturday announced that he had set up a council to pursue peace talks with the Taliban, who have been waging an insurgency in Afghanistan for almost nine years.
Before that they ran the place, and were fighting against an insurgency made up of the non-Pashtun tribes, if I recall correctly.
The formation of the High Peace Council was "a significant step towards peace talks," a statement from Karzai's office said.

The move is one of the most significant steps Karzai has taken in his oft-stated efforts to open a dialogue with the Taliban leadership aimed at speeding an end to the long war.
It'd probably be a generation before the Afghan Army could sustain the fight against the ISI-trained and supplied Taliban on their own. But President Obama promised to pull out troops in a year. The situation is impossible, even were President Karzai and his relatives ever so incorruptible.
The establishment of such a panel was approved in June at a national peace conference in Kabul, a move welcomed by foreign governments working to stabilize the Afghan government and economy.

Although the Taliban leadership has shown no appetite for talks, Karzai hopes the reconciliation process will help split the movement between its hardcore members and those less committed to its strict Islamic ideology.

The council was mooted as a negotiating body, to be made up of representatives of a broad section of Afghan society, to talk peace with the Taliban, who have been waging war since their regime was toppled in late 2001.

Officials met Karzai at his palace on Saturday to finalize the list of members, who would include "jihadi leaders, influential figures and women," the statement said.

The complete list of members would be announced after the Eid holiday next week, it said.

Karzai's announcement had been expected some days ago, after he met last week with former mujahedeen leaders Burhanuddin Rabbani and Abdul Rasul Sayyaf,
... Arabia's man on the ground...
as well as officials, to discuss the make up of the council.

His front man Simak Herawi said last week that it would include "some (former) Taliban and Hizb-i-Islami members," a reference to a minor bad turban group led by former prime minister and mujahedeen leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.
... who used to be known as The Most Evil Man in the World but who now seems merely run-of-the-mill evil...

"This council will... certainly be effective in decreasing the level of violence in Afghanistan," Herawi said.
Or not. But while he is meeting, wheeling and dealing, Mr. Hekmatyar won't be able to do much nefarious plotting. The local villagers will appreciate the result, no doubt.
Hekmatyar's Hizb-i-Islami is currently in a tenuous alliance with the Taliban, although both sides remain suspicious of each other.

Hekmatyar's power has waned over the years and he commands far fewer fighters than the Taliban. Nevertheless, the group is active across part of Afghanistan's northern and eastern provinces.

The Taliban have repeatedly spurned peace overtures, deriding Karzai's government as a puppet of the United States and saying they will not talk peace until all foreign forces have left the country.

The announcement comes as the insurgency escalates and the number of foreign troop casualties so far this year nears the 2009 toll, at 485 with the deaths on Tuesday of five US soldiers in two separate incidents.

The United States and NATO have almost 150,000 troops in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban-led insurgency, most of them in the southern hotspots of Helmand and Kandahar provinces.
Link


Afghanistan
Afghanistan dismisses 'war criminals' report
2006-12-18
Afghan President Hamid Karzai has angrily rejected a Human Rights Watch (HRW) report that says war criminals are holding positions in his administration. The US-based HRW report released this week named in particular legislators Abdul Rasul Sayyaf and Mohammad Qasim Fahim, former president Burhanuddin Rabbani, Energy Minister Ismail Khan and Vice-President Karim Khalili. It proposed Afghan and international judges should hear cases against them relating to the 1979-1992 communist regime, the 1992-1996 civil war and the 1996-2001 Taliban regime.
I have no use for Rassoul Sayyaf, but demanding his trial - and that of Rabbani and Ismail Khan - as "war criminals" reveals either absolute ignorance about anything that's happened in Afghanistan since 1979 or a level of fatuous self-righteousness of Jimmy Carterian proportions.
A statement from his office says Mr Karzai considers the report to be stoopid incorrect and regrettable. "The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan states that a number of jihadi leaders have played a positive role in ensuring peace, system-building and strengthening our national institutions in the past five years," it said. "The Afghan Government wants Human Rights Watch to prepare its report on Afghanistan based on realities and realistic assessments."
"When you pull this stuff out of your ass we'll treat it like what it is."
Several leaders who were involved in decades of conflicts and bloodshed in Afghanistan are still holding key government positions, including some working as provincial governors. Many of these leaders, known as warlords, still maintain their own private armies, making it difficult for the US-backed leader to extend his authority beyond the capital, Kabul.
On the other hand, if they didn't have their "militias," the national army would have been smothered in its crib and Karzai wouldn't be in Kabul.
Link


Afghanistan
Traffic Accident Prompts Kabul protest
2006-05-30
I would note that we had a story some days ago that noted that some of Abdul Rasul Sayyaf's pet imams were calling for jihad in Kabul. While some of the protesters no doubt showed up for other reasons, I'd wager that if you look at the overlap between who attends those mosques and who showed up to shout "Death to the Great Satan" you'd see a fair correlation between the two.
Violent anti-foreigner protests raged across the capital yesterday after a U.S. military truck crashed into traffic, touching off the worst rioting since the Taliban's ouster in 2001. At least eight persons died and 107 were injured before Kabul's streets calmed.

Chanting "Death to America," rioters stoned the U.S. convoy involved in the accident, then headed to the center of town, ransacking offices of international aid groups and searching for foreigners in a display of rising resentment over civilian deaths in the war against insurgents.

Gunfire, at times intense, rang out across Kabul as hundreds of young men looted shops and set fire to police cars and station houses. Some people said U.S. and Afghan troops fired on the crowds.
Link


Afghanistan
Some Kabul clerics calling for jihad
2006-05-23
Clerics in Kabul mosques are urging worshippers to join the Taliban’s fight against the Afghan government and international troops.

Insurgency has spread recently, with many provinces falling under control of Islamists intent on driving out foreign forces. Encouraged by this growing militancy, some imams here believe the time is right to call for holy war.

"The only thing (people) can do is fight against the government and I am telling them they can do that. They can pick up a gun and fight against the government," said Abdullah, a 52-year-old imam wary of giving his full name for fear of reprisals.

Support for the militant Islamist Taliban traditionally comes from the conservative, Pashtun-dominated south and east. Attacks against security forces are common in provinces near the Pakistan border but had been rare elsewhere.

That changed last year, when more than 1,500 civilians were killed. In recent months, violence has spread swiftly, moving north to districts just outside Kabul.

A car bomber struck a truck near a U.S. military base yesterday, killing at least two people here.

Those additional deaths, including 20 Taliban, 12 Afghan troops and a coalition soldier, killed Saturday and identified by the Los Angeles Times as an American, brought the toll to more than 190 people since Wednesday, when a storm of violence broke out in the south.

The car accident apparently prevented the bomber from reaching his target, either a store frequented by foreigners on Kabul’s outskirts, or the U.S. or NATO forces with bases on the same road, said interior ministry spokesperson Yousuf Stanizai.

The Taliban now control many rural areas south of the capital and their increasing success is finding favour with fundamentalists here.

"It’s a reality, the fighters are getting stronger and stronger because the government is alienating the community and the people," Abdullah said.

"Real mullahs, imams and anyone with a knowledge of Islam has to say it’s time for jihad. Those people who are fighting against the Americans and the government are doing good, but the government and the Americans say they are terrorists just because they want to give them a bad name."

Christian Willach, operations co-ordinator for ANSO, the Afghanistan NGO Safety Office, said attacks in the capital region have only targeted government or NATO troops and insurgents have not yet threatened aid groups in Kabul. "(But) If people are instigating other people to pick up arms for whatever reason ... that’s always a bad sign.

"Kabul is relatively safe" for workers with the 600 to 800 aid groups working here, Willach said, but non-government organizations have stopped operations in many other districts because security is deteriorating, which fuels insurgent claims that aid groups are not in place to help Afghans.

"It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. It makes an easy recruiting ground for militia commanders, Taliban, Al Qaeda - whatever. If people are frustrated, it’s easy for them to be recruited."

Abdullah’s long beard reached the top of his shalwar kameez as he sat cross-legged on the floor of his mosque. Every Friday he preaches for 500 to 600 and says he has seen their anger grow to boiling point.

"The people don’t co-operate with the government because money came to Afghanistan and it just went into the pockets of the NGOs and people in high positions. The poor people got nothing. (Officials) spend the money on alcohol, big houses, security guards and big cars with dark windows. That is why the people are very angry with the government."

Also his worshippers want Islamic law, sharia, restored.

"Afghanistan is an Islamic country and it should be following the law of sharia," Abdullah said. "In previous regimes, there were no shops where they clearly sold alcohol. There were no houses or hotels where they had prostitutes. Now we do have those things."

At another mosque, built with money donated by a Kuwaiti businessman, Mustafa said the "time is ready for jihad." He accused foreign troops of insulting Afghan culture when they raided homes looking for militants.

"I can’t tell them directly to start jihad because then I will get into trouble," said Mustafa, 37. "But I will tell them to go away and do what they want, because it is forbidden in Islam for soldiers to search our houses."

Mustafa preaches to about 8,000 Muslims every Friday. His mosque’s exterior is decorated with posters of Abdul Rasul Sayyaf, an extremist MP and ex-warlord whose forces devastated Kabul in the 1990s civil war.

Imam Mohammed Sadiq happily gave his surname. As the gap between rich and poor grows, he said a call to jihad "is getting nearer and nearer."

At his mosque, the 35-year-old said "drinking alcohol is `harem’ (forbidden), prostitution is `harem’ and for men to have sex with boys is `harem’ ... and it is all going on in Kabul. If these conditions continue, everyone will say it’s time for jihad.

"So far I have one lot of evidence - that is, that the Americans and the foreigners are entering houses and searching women with their hands."
Link


India-Pakistan
Revolution in the Pakistani mountains
2006-03-23
EFL
Three major tribes live in North Waziristan, which has become the Taliban's prime stronghold outside of Afghanistan: the Wazirs, the Mehsuds and the Dawar. British soldiers referred to the Wazirs as wolves, and the Mehsuds as panthers of the mountains.

The Dawar have traditionally been peace-loving, preferring shopkeeping to guns and towns over mountains. The Mehsud and Wazir tribes, though, have been arch-rivals for centuries. Traditionally, the Mehsuds have been part of the Pakistani establishment, and as recently as the past few years they supported the military's actions against Wazir tribes, who are mostly Taliban.

In today's North Waziristan, though, Maulana Sadiq Noor and Maulana Abdul Khaliq are the unbending leaders of the Taliban-led resistance. They are both Dawar and, even more startling, the Wazirs and the Mehsuds are under their command. The man in charge of launching mujahideen raids into Afghanistan is Maulana Sangeen, an Afghan from neighboring Khost province.

In South Waziristan, Haji Omar, a Wazir, is the leader of the resistance against Pakistani forces, while Afghan operations run from the area are taken care of by Abdullah Mehsud, of the Mehsud tribe. "Nobody has seen such an arrangement in centuries, where the Mehsuds and Wazirs are fighting side-by-side, and more, under the command of the Dawars," said a local bureaucrat in Waziristan who spoke to Asia Times Online on the condition of anonymity.

The revolution that is sweeping across Waziristan is not confined to the region. It is on the march, with the eventual targets being Kabul and Islamabad. The overall command center is in South Waziristan, where al-Qaeda No 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri calls the shots, while Tahir Yaldevish, leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and a key figure in the Afghan resistance, moves around Paktika province in Afghanistan.

Well-placed sources in the Taliban movement who spoke to Asia Times Online claim that the Taliban communicated "final messages" to Afghan and Pakistani officials, warning of direct attacks across both countries against top army and civilian officials. As a result, according to the sources, Pakistan stopped military operations in North and South Waziristan that were aimed at rooting out Taliban and foreign forces.

In Afghanistan, the Taliban strategy is to terrorize Afghan officials and prevent them from cooperating with foreign forces. And once the allied forces are alienated, attacks on them will be intensified. At the same time, the administrations in the capitals of the two countries are becoming increasingly isolated. The US-backed ruling royalists in Kabul are now threatened by Islamists who completely dominate parliament after recent general elections. There is no doubt that radical Islamists, whether those of the Hizb-i-Islami, the Ittehad-i-Islami led by Professor Abdul Rasul Sayyaf, the alliance led by Yunus Qanooni or dozens of independent former Taliban, are now at the helm of political affairs in Kabul. And the US-backed ruling and nominally secular officers of the Pakistani army are more on their own than ever before. A silent alliance of religious elements and religious parties is keeping a sharp eye on developments in the mountains, waiting for its chance to join in the revolution as it rolls off the mountaintops.
Link


Terror Networks
Binny's mentor recalls rise and fall of the Taliban
2006-03-14
The Saudi Academic figure, Dr. Mussa al Qarni gives an important testimony on the "years of Jihad in Afghanistan", and the Arab-Afghan phenomena, as an active player throughout the era, from beginning to end. He entertained close ties with the different parties involved, whether through religious incitement or field military participation. He kept contact and was informed of the Afghani situation after the internal strife broke out in the country. Throughout the five years he spent in the Mujahideen's training camps, he was considered the legal ideologue of the Arab-Afghans and of some of the Afghani factions' leaders as well. Today, he ascertains that Bin Laden viewed him as his personal Mufti in matters of Fiqh (jurisprudence) and Sharia (Islamic Law).

In the testimony published by Al-Hayat, over three episodes, Dr. Al Qarni describes the majority of "Arab Mujahideen" against the Soviet occupation as being chaotic. He adds that they hated Ahmad Shah Massoud for many a reason, including his military discipline. He also observed that many of them were "extremely deviant" prior to their following of the Jihad path, while some "were even ignorant of the prayer and the ablution Fiqh". Al Qarni believes that Ahmad Shah Massoud was "the only one among all Mujahideen leaders to head a well-organized army, and have a clear strategy". Despite all this, Ussama bin Laden took part in his in absentia trial on charges of "servitude to the West and being an infidel". He did not eliminate the possibility of Bin Laden's participation in the plot to assassinate Massoud prior to the September 11 attacks. Given his deep knowledge of Bin Laden's character, he says that the latter "will never surrender, for he seeks death and runs to it". Al Qarni confirms that several attempts have been made to persuade Bin Laden of leaving Sudan and returning to Saudi Arabia, where he would settle down and resume his normal life, but all efforts were fruitless.

He believes that "the Egyptian Jihad" may have been responsible for the assassination of one of the most prominent Arab-Afghan leaders, "Sheikh Abdallah Yusuf Azzam", because the movement "perceived him as an obstacle to the execution of its plans in Afghanistan". He also asserts that Bin Laden is now a part of the "Egyptian Islamic Jihad's" thought, lead by Ayman al Zawahiri, and moves according to its plans.

To Al Qarni, Gulbuddine Hikmatyar is "the one who dispersed the most the gains of the Afghani Jihad ", while the Taliban's rise to power was "a calamity that befell the Afghan people, destroying the last memories of the purity of the anti-Soviet Jihad era". Al Qarni stresses that building schools and institutes was the Arab-Afghans' foremost important achievement, a fact that Afghans attest to according to him.

The legal ideologue of Al Qaeda leader recalls the stages of the rise and fall of the Islamic State dream in Afghanistan…Moussa al Qarni: I egged the Arab-Afghans on… Bin Laden took part in Massoud's trial and was unable to convict him!

Many perceive the "Afghani experience with its Mujahideen" as a long-gone period that failed to affect anything in our present era. However, the Saudi academic figure Dr. Moussa al Qarni who played a leading role in instigating Jihad on the Saudi front and went to Afghanistan during the first period of Jihad against the Soviets sees otherwise.

Not only is Al Qarni stimulating through his narration of the events related to Jihad leaders, dead or alive, and his testimonies concerning yesterday's "Mujahideen" and today's "Terrorists", but he is similarly interesting through his calm character that enabled him to live contradictory periods simultaneously, and to remove himself of every experience with rare shrewdness.

A friend to all the parties and a promoter of respect to the Islamic governments among the Takfiriyeen [those who tax others of being infidels], Al Qarni was to the Mujahideen a defender of the "Murtaddin" [apostates] like Ahmad Shah Massoud, an opponent of the Taliban state and a personal friend to Bin Laden. He is a legendary character that blended with both the incitation to Jihad and the stagnating "Tadris".

Al Hayat met with Al Qarni and asked him the following:

Al-Hayat: How did you go to Pakistan and then to Afghanistan to work alongside the Mujahideen during the 1980's?

Al Qarni: Some courses were held in Peshawar, Pakistan. I asked the president of the university while I was a lecturer to go with the Peshawar group. I told him that if I went along, I would also investigate the status of the Mujahideen. I mixed work in the training course with the discovery of the fighting fronts where I got to know the conditions and status of the Mujahideen. It was then that I met Sheikhs Abdallah Azzam and Abdul Rasul Sayyaf. At the time, Sheikh Sayyaf owned a university called "Da'wa and Jihad University" in Qaryat al Hijra (the migration village), near Peshawar. Although initially established as a home to the Afghan immigrants, the village attracted the majority of Arabs and their families. Sheikh Sayyaf was elected at the time president of the "Islamic Union among the Mujahideen". When they started their Jihad, the Mujahideen were dispersed in many factions, which made the Muslim Ulemas [clerics] and Preachers call on them to unite in one body: thus was born the Islamic Union, over which Sayyaf was elected president. His election was instigated by his studies in Al Azhar and his good knowledge of the Arabic language. This is why Arabs who went there were naturally attracted to Sayyaf's whereabouts, for he was firstly the head of the Islamic Union, which, to them, conferred legitimacy upon the Mujahideen, and secondly he was well versed in Arabic. Therefore, he had a guesthouse in this village, where I stayed for a long time. This was the beginning. Afterwards, I wished to elongate my stay with the Mujahideen and there were discussions and consultations as to how I could do so. Since Sheikh Sayyaf had the Da'wa and Jihad University, he told me: 'I could request your presence as a teacher there'. He sent a request to the Saudi State asking that professors be sent to his University. The request was referred to the Islamic University of Medina, which sent five professors, myself included, to the Da'wa and Jihad University. We stayed there for two years, but my role in there was different from that of the other brothers' who had been sent with me. They only gave classes in the University.

Al-Hayat: Who were your colleagues in the Da'wa and Jihad University?

Al Qarni: Drs. Hamdan Rajeh Al Sharif, now retired, Ibrahim al Murshid, presently a teacher in Al Kassim, Sheikh Rashid al Ruhaili, now retired from the Islamic University and over eighty years of age, Professor Dakhil Allah al Ruhaili, presently a lecturer at the Islamic University, and myself. As I mentioned earlier, the others' role was simply to teach at the university, while mine was a mixture of teaching there and entering the fronts to preach, give legal and religious lessons to the Mujahideen youth and participate in certain operations, given my knowledge of Sheikh Sayyaf and the Mujahideen.

Al-Hayat: What shape did the Da'wa [call] take then?

Al Qarni: Many of the Arab youths who joined the Jihad had not received any Islamic education. Many of them had been living a life of deviance, and some were only directed to the straight path immediately before they went to wage Jihad. I personally know young men who were deviant or even extremely so, who joined Jihad and were killed, and we ask God that they be martyrs. Some of these men were attracted to the path of Jihad. This fact was in truth very beneficial to me in my Da'wa, because I realized that many of these deviant young men are good people who have not found the right environment that can guide and foster them, and they were therefore compelled to follow the wrong path. When these men came along, they were unaware of the prayer or ablution rules. They only came to fight. My personal conditions were therefore more related to the legal aspects: the conditions of purity, prayer, Jihad, invasions, spoils and fighting; When to fight and when to abstain, etc. These courses were given to young men, naturally, and there were other military training courses from military specialists.

Al-Hayat: Were you present during the military training and what was it based on?

Al Qarni: Yes I was. They were chiefly based on endurance. You know that Afghanistan is a mountainous area with no paved roads and cars. This is why you have to be able to handle hardship, to climb a mountain and walk for 10-12 hours straight carrying your food, arms and clothes on your back and this important aspect is endurance. The second basis was training to use personal weapons. You are in a battle and you must carry a weapon (a Kalashnikov), and know how to use all personal weapons, starting with the small gun. Naturally, people vary in roles and preferences: while some only learn how to use the Kalashnikov, others want to fight with their bodies; others still wish to learn the use of the anti-aircraft cannon, or even the fabrication and dismantling of mines. Courses vary with people, but the majority trained to use the personal arms, i.e. guns and Kalashnikovs.

Al-Hayat: Was there any suicide operation training?

Al Qarni: No, there were no such missions in that period. Young men would attack tanks and planes themselves. The battle was an open field, you had the Russian bases with their tanks and planes and you were facing them alone with your weapon.

Al-Hayat: Did the university you worked in with four of your colleagues really become a place to pass intelligence operations? In other words, was the Hijra village an intelligence passage?

Al Qarni: The presence of intelligence is a must and is only natural. In this atmosphere, it would be incomprehensible that those participating in the Jihad in Afghanistan would not have intelligence agents Any country, whether the United States, Pakistan or even the Russian enemy had intelligence officers there, sometimes even in the midst of the Afghan Mujahideen. This is only normal. However, we never saw these things in truth, for the intelligence were not related to the Mujahideen but to the politicians.

Al-Hayat: Did the Mujahideen kill a group of people working with them, or execute them after they discovered that they had been leaking information to other parties?

Al Qarni: This came along in late phases only. During the first phases, Jihad was a completely open operation and as such, it did not offer the possibility of hiding. Let me give you an example, some States- maybe of the pro-communism States- would send in their intelligence sometimes. We know for a fact that some Arab States sympathized with Russia and therefore sent their intelligence. What was the officer to do then? He is first welcomed, then invited to go to battle. He had no choice then but to join the fighters. Otherwise, if he chose to be an intelligence officer that stays behind in the rear rows, among the immigrants and the civilians, he would either try and fail to move along in the front rows, or be exposed and die. He has no wish to die. You are now in a direct confrontation with the enemy, meaning that you are marching towards death.

Al-Hayat: How many stages did the Jihad in Afghanistan go through in the 1980's?

Al Qarni: I personally believe that the first period extends from the beginning of the Jihad to the fall of communism in Kabul and the entry of the Mujahideen to the city. The second stage was marked by the internal strife among the Mujahideen. During this period, we were completely isolated. Personally, after the Mujahideen entered Kabul and began to inter-fight I came back to my country and refused to participate any further.

Al-Hayat: When was the approximate date of your return?

Al Qarni: The problem is that I have a hard time remembering dates.

Al-Hayat: Was it in the beginning of the nineties?

Al Qarni: Approximately

Al-Hayat: Was it prior to the Taliban era?

Al Qarni: Yes, it was. It was when Ahmad Shah Massoud entered Kabul and Nizam Najibullah's regime fell. I believe that this was in the nineties. During that period, many of the brothers who went to Jihad, apart from myself, returned to our countries.

Al-Hayat: Did Ussama Bin Laden return with you?

Al Qarni: Ussama Bin Laden returned afterwards.

Al-Hayat: Can you recall the date?

Al Qarni: I honestly do not memorize dates.

Al-Hayat: I heard that the Mujahideen refused to memorize the Gregorian calendar.

Al Qarni: I do not belong to this kind of people. Most of those who went to Jihad, per example, were identified as "Abu Such and Such" instead of their real names, whereas I moved in all the Pakistani regions using my real name.

Al-Hayat: Bin Laden's nickname, Abu Abdallah, has not changed since, has it?

Al Qarni: That is true. Bin Laden's nickname has always been Abdullah. He is well known, by all.

Al-Hayat: Suleiman Abu Ghaith was also with you during those days. Do you know him?

Al Qarni: No, I don't.

Al-Hayat: How about Abu Suleiman Al Makki Khaled al Harbi?

Al Qarni: Yes, I got to know al Makki during that period. He was one of the first to wage Jihad, before going to Chechnya.

Al-Hayat: Shall we return to your stay?

Al Qarni: I was there during the first two years of teaching, and when they were over, I was entitled to an academic sabbatical. I took this year, because I wanted to renew my stay at the university. The Saudi University only lent us to the Afghani one for two years, but I was entitled to the academic sabbatical and so I asked for it as soon as my two years were over. Hence, I spent three years, before returning to Afghanistan one more, where I spent five years, in the end.

Al-Hayat: Who was taking care of your family during that period?

Al Qarni: I was receiving my salary from the university. Our relatives were around the family, and every six months approximately during the school year, I would take a couple of weeks to come and stay with them. During the summer vacation, I would come and take them back with me. I had built a house in the Hijra village. The first three years were continuous, then I began to visit them during the summer vacations.

Al-Hayat: Does this university still exist?

Al Qarni: No, it has closed its doors.

Al-Hayat: Did it really incite radicalism?

Al Qarni: It was not called radicalism back then. Fighting communists was the common "air du temps". Now, they call it radicalism, while then they called it Jihad. The university's architecture college was established by a Saudi architect; He is a well-known brother who clearly supported Jihad. A professor at the King Saud University, he was also the owner of an architectural bureau in Medina, and was called Ahmad Farid Mustapha.

Al-Hayat: How did the University function?

Al Qarni: Among the programs of the da'wa and Jihad University were teaching and training students to wage Jihad (…); They would enter the Afghani territories, because the distance between the Hijra village and the Afghan borders only took two hours to cross from the direction of Jalal Abad. During the Thursday and Friday weekend, groups of college students entered the front and fought with the Mujahideen.

Al-Hayat: Were intelligence officers training them?

Al Qarni: No, there were special trainers. In the Arab camps, there were Arab trainers; some of them retired military men, with a high training level. As for the Afghan camps, they had their own trainers. In addition, the Pakistani army also offered financial and moral support.

Al-Hayat: In that period, Bin Laden followed Abdallah Azzam?

Al Qarni: Yes, he did.

Al-Hayat: Was he entitled to give his opinion?

Al Qarni: His opinion was doubtless well esteemed, but he did not take decisions on his own. There was some sort of council that discussed the Mujahideen's status.

Al-Hayat: How would you describe the relationship between Ahmad Shah Massoud, Abdallah Azzam and Bin Laden?

Al Qarni: To Sheikh Abdallah Azzam, there was no bigger or more esteemed fighter than Massoud. He even called him the Hero of the North. I recall asking him about this once, because Arabs did not like Ahmad Shah Massoud (his right appellation). There were many reasons why they hated him. Most importantly, Hikmatyar influenced the Arabs; he was their host and they trained in his camps. It was a known fact all throughout the Jihad days, and up to the assassination of Massoud that the latter's sworn enemy was Hikmatyar. Arabs were therefore influenced by Hikmatyar's animosity towards Massoud, and they adopted it themselves. Some of them even became more bitter enemies to Massoud that Hikmatyar was.

Al-Hayat: You mean to say that Hikmatyar received the Arabs and egged them on?

Al Qarni: Yes, I do. This fact should be known to all. Massoud lived in northern Afghanistan and not near the border with Pakistan. Should anyone want to reach Massoud, he would need no less than twenty days to cross from the Pakistani borders to the North, where he was staying. Massoud was indeed in an area on the Russian borders, which is why he neither had an office in Peshawar, nor had an information office given his presence on the frontline with the Russians. Hikmatyar and Sayyaf on the other hand had military camps and fronts near Pakistan, in the Pashtun area. The majority of Arabs that came to the country were therefore with them. You can say that over 95% of Arabs who came to join the Jihad were distributed between Hikmatyar and Sayyaf, with a minority that headed in the direction of Sheikh Younes Khalis and Jalal eddine Haqqani. Only a handful of Arabs whom we know well went to Massoud, because of his conflict with Hikmatyar. There was a second factor for the Arabs' animosity towards Massoud, may God rest his soul: The man was organized in his thinking, strategic planning, and fighting, and was never a chaotic person. The majority of Arabs who came to join Jihad did not like military organization and discipline. They were chaotic. Some of them would come in for a week, go on an operation, shoot, fight, invade then return. Some others would come in for a month or two only, and so on. Subsequently, Sayyaf and Hikmatyar's fronts were like open fields.

Al-Hayat: Would that mean that Hikmatyar and Sayyaf's guesthouses were like open cafes?

Al Qarni: Only in the sense that they did not impose on those who joined them a specific program or period that they must abide by. Massoud, on the other hand, would not accept for anyone to come to him, unless he has decided to commit to Jihad, stay with him and obey his orders. No operation can ever be launched without an order from him. On Hikmatyar and Sayyaf's fronts, the Arabs were independent and could wage separate operations and do whatever they wished, without supervision. At the beginning of the Jihad era, a group of Arabs went to join Massoud, bearing the same thought as the one they dealt with on Sayyaf and Hikmatyar's fronts. At Massoud's they arranged for an independent operation, without the man's knowledge, attacking a Muslim convoy instead of a Russian one. When Massoud knew of this, he put them in prison, only liberating them after many a mediation. By the time they returned to Hikmatyar in Peshawar, their animosity of Massoud had reached incredible heights, stimulated by their incarceration and his displeasure with their behavior. Sheikh Abdallah Azzam then visited Massoud, prompted by all the talk- mostly negative- of this person in Peshawar. Some accused him of working for the West since his father had been an army general. The generals' sons would study in Western schools, and since he went to such a school as well, they accused him of being an agent for the West. Some others accused him of having an unethical behavior, which is why there was a big commotion around him in Peshawar, instigated by Arabs; so much so, in fact, that they began to discuss whether he should get financial support or not.

Al-Hayat: It was rumored that Massoud was Shiite…

Al Qarni: That is not true, Massoud is Sunni and not Shiite. I remember that when there was a commotion in Peshawar, a court was convened to try him in absentia. Two people were defending him and 21 were against him. One of his defenders was brother Abdallah Anas, Sheikh Abdallah Azzam's son-in-law and a British resident, while the other was an Algerian brother called Qari Abdel Rahim. Both of these men lived with Massoud and knew him intimately. They knew who the real Massoud was. The other 21 people comprised Algerians, Egyptians and Yemenis; there were no Saudis among them at the time. These people believed that Massoud was an infidel. The trial was convened, with Abdallah Azzam, Sheikh Abdel Majid al Zandani and Ussama Bin Laden as members.

Al-Hayat: How long was the trial?

Al Qarni: The trial lasted a whole week. Naturally, they requested my presence but I refused to be part of it. However, I was informed of the events through Sheikhs Abdallah Azzam, Abdel Majid, from Ussama Bin Laden, Abdallah Anas and Qari Abdel Rahim. One peculiar fact was that Qari Abdel Rahim had a brother called Qari Saeed who was a staunch enemy of Massoud's. After Qari Saeed, may God forgive him and rest his soul, returned from Afghanistan he joined the armed factions and was killed in Algeria. In the end, the 21 men could not prove any of the charges that they accused Massoud of. When the committee wanted to reach a decision after the hearings, they found that they could say neither a positive nor a negative word about him.

Al-Hayat: How do you read this result?

Al Qarni: I consider this result unfair: you either prove the charge or refute it. However, given that Ussama Bin Laden and Sheikh Abdel Majid Al Zandani were closer to Hikmatyar than to Massoud, and that the whole congregation did not wish to monopolize the Peshawar Arabs' inclination, this happened. Some said "all Arabs were against Massoud, so how could we praise him?", while Sheikh Abdallah Azzam, may God rest his soul, said "I will praise Massoud, until the last day of my life". Therefore, when he left the meeting, he put down plans in Massoud's praise and wrote a book about him, entitled "Titans of the North". But he could not print it, because the whole of Peshawar was almost Hikmatyar's and Sayyaf's. Massoud had no presence or influence in the land, and Azzam was unable to print the book. I once asked Sheikh Abdallah Azzam, may God rest his soul, "Sheikh Abdallah, do you still believe that Massoud was the Hero of Afghanistan?", he answered me:" He is the Hero of Islam". During this time, brother Abdallah Anas spoke to me of Massoud frequently (…), and this incited me to visit the latter, to get to know him closely. I also saw in his Jihad a different kind of Jihad. The South Afghanistan Mujahideen were waging a gangster war, where you can neither eliminate your enemy nor lose. That war did not follow a clear strategy, and that is why neither Sheikh Sayyaf, nor Hikmatyar, nor Haqani, nor Younes Khalis, and all the Peshawar-based factions were unable to take over a big city. These parties lived in mountains, valleys and small villages, and waged a hit-and-run war, where they would attack a place, and take spoils of war, before communists would attack in turn and kick them out, and so on. However, Massoud followed a different path. He waged an organized war, had an organized army and a clear strategy.

*Biographical note:

Dr. Mussa bin Muhammad bin Yahya al Qarni.
- Born in 1954 (1374 Hijra) in Jazan, Bish city
- Married with twelve children, six girls and six boys
- Obtained a Doctorate in Fiqh from al Qura University in Mecca
- A former co-professor in Usul al Fiqh at the Islamic University
- Former Dean of student affairs at the Islamic University
- Former head of the Usul el fiqh department in the Islamic University
- Former member of the scientific committee in the Islamic University.
- Former director of the Islamic University in Peshawar
- Founding member of the International Islamic Relief
- Former board member of the International Islamic Relief
- Member of the founding committee of the International Islamic
Teaching body
- Currently works in the legal field, and the Islamic legal consultations, after retirement.
Link


Afghanistan
Rabbani backs Qanooni for speaker of Afghan House
2005-12-21
Less than 24 hours after inauguration Afghanistan's parliament faces its first challenge with today's election of Speaker. Former president Sibgatullah Mojadeddi was yesterday elected as chairman of the Upper House, the Senate.
Sibgatullah is one of those ineffectual guys that everybody can agree on because he doesn't have a mob...
But today's contest pits former president Burhanuddin Rabbani, an ethnic Tajik, backing failed presidential candidate Younus Qanooni against dreaded Pashtun leader Abdul Rasul Sayyaf.
I'd go with Qanooni without hesitation if I was Karzai. Rasool Sayyaf is a creature of the Saudis, a slippery deal maker who'd sell out his Mom and probably give a discount. Qanooni did a right fine job as interior minister during the transition period. He was a follower of Masood, and I think he's a man of caliber in his own right. His disadvantage in politix is being a Tadjik.
In a race already marred by charges of vote buying at $600 a vote, factions have forged new alliances that shed ethnic differences for political gain. Sayyaf is accused by rights groups of human rights violations in the civil war that followed the end of the 10-year Soviet occupation in 1989.
In this case they're right...
Abdul Sayyaf's comrade is former Qanooni ally, Haji Mohammad Mohaqiq, the fierce Hazara leader who heads Hizb-e-Wahdat, with whom Abdul Sayyaf's forces once clashed. Like Sayyaf, he is accused of rights abuses during the 1992-96 civil war that killed 50,000 people in Kabul.
Mohaqiq leads a Shia faction. I can't see him getting along really well with Rasool's Salafists. But I believe Iran owns him, so maybe that accounts for it.
Qanooni won over Ahmad Shah Massood's faction and Uzbek strongman Rashid Dostum. The mujahideen hero, married to a Pashtun, hopes to woo Pashtuns, former mujahideen and first time women lawmakers. Shukria Barakzai, one of 68 women parliamentarians could eat into his vote.
She's a Pashtun, I believe, but she's a female, which makes her a Pashtun of little consequence. And she's closest thing Afghanistan has to emancipated wimmin, so I'd guess she's a place-holder...
Karzai, informed sources say, chose to back Sayyaf over Rabbani after US prodding.
My guess would be that's the Soddies, working through tame undersecretaries in our State Department. Being generous, we'll say they don't know any better. It's for sure they weren't paying any attention in the 80s, assuming they were around then.
He must find a way of circumventing Abdul Sayyaf's war crimes record, projecting the Paghman chief's Pashtun credentials. Karzai will draw on support from "Pashtuns, independents, democratic intellectuals, women, former communists and Taliban", said analyst Neik Mohammad Kabuli of the National Democratic Institute (NDI) in Kabul. Analysts say the Abdul Sayyaf versus Qanooni contest pits Pashtuns, who make up 50 per cent of the population, against a coalition of minorities.
Who make up the other, more savory, 50 percent.
Link


Afghanistan/South Asia
Afghan Vote Counting Nears Completion
2005-10-05
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) - Powerful warlords, a former Taliban commander and women's activists were among the frontrunners as vote counting drew to a close Tuesday in Afghanistan's first parliamentary elections in more than 30 years.

Preliminary results will be announced starting Wednesday or Thursday and in phases, in the event of unrest, officials said. Losing candidates are expected to bombard election authorities with complaints and accusations of cheating. Final certified results are due Oct. 22.

The election Web site, which charts progress in the count, shows that in most provinces, the top-ranking candidates for the 249 Wolesi Jirga, or National Assembly, are warlords or leaders of mujahedeen factions, many of them active in the anti-Soviet resistance of the 1980s and the ruinous 1992-96 civil war that followed.

Abdul Rasul Sayyaf, a former guerrilla leader and arch conservative suspected of having had links with al-Qaida is set to win a seat in Kabul. Hazrat Ali, a former provincial police chief accused of ties to illegal armed groups is leading in eastern Nangahar province. He and his militia were used by U.S. forces to hunt Taliban and al-Qaida.

But there are also plenty of new faces. Among the expected winners is 27-year-old Malalai Joya, a women's rights worker, who rose to prominence for daring to denounce powerful warlords at a post-Taliban constitutional convention two years ago. Women candidates are reserved a quarter of all seats.

Three former Taliban government ministers - including the minister of vice and virtue who imposed harsh Islamic restrictions on women during its rule - appear to have failed resoundingly at the ballot box, so far winning only a few hundred votes each. Yet in insurgency-plagued Zabul province, a former Taliban military commander, Abdul Salaam Rocketi, is leading. He battled against the U.S.-led ouster of the hardline militia, but has since denounced the rebels. He earned his last name for his skill in firing rockets.

In the capital, the two chief rivals to Karzai in last year's presidential election - ethnic Hazara leader Mohammed Mohaqeq and Younus Qanooni from the Northern Alliance - are leading.
It remains to be seen if they can marshal broader support within parliament to become an effective check on Karzai's dominance in Afghanistan's highly centralized political system.
Link


Afghanistan/South Asia
Pakistan says has arrested senior Taleban figure
2005-08-19
Pakistan has arrested a purported number 3 senior figure in the Taleban militia near the border with Afghanistan, officials said on Thursday. An intelligence official said Ustad Mohammed Yasir was arrested last week along with another man near the northwestern town of Nowshera. Interior Minister Aftab Khan Sherpao confirmed the arrest but did not give any details.
"We can say no more!"
Sherpao and Leslie Neilson were separated at birth, I believe...
The intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the secretive nature of his job, said Yasir had been a spokesman for fugitive Taleban supreme leader Mullah Omar after the ouster of the hardline regime in late 2001. However, Yasir was not a ranking Taleban member during its rule, although he had served on a prominent council of Islamic clerics at that time.
Ah, a number 33.
The intelligence official said that Yasir, in his 50s, was previously a close aide of an Afghan Islamist faction leader, Abdul Rasul Sayyaf, but joined the Taleban rebels after Sayyaf decided to back U.S.-supported Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/rantburg/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More